Inflammation is associated with many diseases of the lung including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), silicosis, and lung cancer [
1–
4]. Aside from glucocorticoids, there are few effective anti-inflammatory therapies; therefore, the development of novel therapies that have the potential to alleviate pulmonary diseases associated with inflammatory etiologies is a priority.
PPAR
γ ligands are receiving increasing attention as potential anti-inflammatory therapeutics because of their anti-inflammatory properties in a variety of tissues in vivo and cells in vitro [
42]. The anti-inflammatory effects of PPAR
γ ligands have not previously been reported in human lung fibroblasts, a sentinel cell of inflammatory cascades in the lung [
31,
34,
43,
44]. Here, we report that PPAR
γ ligands have potent anti-inflammatory effects in human lung fibroblasts exposed to divergent inflammatory stimuli, and that the mechanism is largely PPAR
γ-independent.
To induce a pro-inflammatory response in human lung fibroblasts, we used two different inflammatory stimuli. IL-1
β is an acute phase inflammatory cytokine, while silica is a particulate that has potent proinflammatory effects when inhaled and is capable of causing both acute and chronic inflammatory lung disease [
32,
33]. Both IL-1
β and silica induced the inflammatory mediators IL-6 and MCP-1, which were inhibited by CDDO, rosiglitazone, and 15d-PGJ
2 (). Interestingly, rosiglitazone was much less effective at inhibiting IL-6 and MCP-1, with an EC
50 5–10-fold higher than 15d-PGJ
2 and at least 30-fold higher than CDDO. CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2, but not rosiglitazone, also blocked upregulation of COX-2 and PGE
2 (Figures and ). This is in agreement with our previous finding that rosiglitazone is less effective than CDDO or 15d-PGJ
2 at inhibiting the pro-fibrotic effects of TGF-
β in lung fibroblasts [
26], and suggests that there are significant differences in the mechanism of action between rosiglitazone and CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2.
Rosiglitazone, CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 all tightly bind the PPAR
γ receptor [
12,
20,
21], activate PPAR
γ-dependent transcription [
22,
23], and promote adipogenesis via a solely PPAR
γ-dependent mechanism [
12,
25]. However, in addition to stimulating PPAR
γ-dependent transcriptional changes, CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 are reported to have effects that are mediated through PPAR
γ-independent pathways [
26,
28,
45]. To determine whether CDDO, and 15d-PGJ
2 might be acting via a PPAR
γ-independent mechanism, we used a pharmacological approach to block PPAR
γ. GW9662 is an irreversible competitive PPAR
γ antagonist that covalently binds to a cysteine residue in the ligand binding domain of PPAR
γ [
46]. GW9662 is a highly effective inhibitor of PPAR
γ-dependent processes including differentiation of osteoclasts and activation of hepatic stellate cells [
47,
48]. We have previously reported that rosiglitazone, CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 drive the differentiation of fibroblasts to adipocytes. GW9662 at 1
μM completely inhibits this effect, demonstrating that this compound is effective at blocking the PPAR
γ-dependent actions of these PPAR
γ ligands [
24]. Here, GW9662 did not reverse the anti-inflammatory effects of CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 (), indicating that the anti-inflammatory effects of CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 on human lung fibroblasts are largely independent of the PPAR
γ-dependent transcriptional pathway. Rosiglitazone was such a poor inhibitor of the inflammatory effects of IL-1
β that it was not possible to show a reversal of inhibition by GW9662, which would be expected if rosiglitazone acted by a purely PPAR
γ-dependent mechanism.
Comparing the chemical structures of rosiglitazone, CDDO, and 15d-PGJ
2, it is notable that CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 have strong electrophilic carbons, whereas rosiglitazone does not. 15d-PGJ
2 has one
α/
β-unsaturated ketone ring with an electrophilic carbon capable of forming covalent bonds through Michael addition reactions [
49], whereas CDDO has two [
18,
30]. We have recently demonstrated the importance of these electrophilic carbons in preventing TGF-
β-inducedmyofibroblast differentiation [
26,
50]. We hypothesize that the electrophilic carbons of CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 are also important for their anti-inflammatory effects. To test this hypothesis, we used CAY10410, a structural analog of 15d-PGJ
2 that lacks the
α/
β-unsaturated ketone, and PGA
1, another electrophilic prostaglandin. In lung fibroblasts stimulated with IL-1
β, CAY10410 did not inhibit COX-2 upregulation or IL-6 production and was half as effective as 15d-PGJ
2 at blocking MCP-1 production (Figures and ). On the other hand, PGA
1 significantly attenuated IL-6 and completely blocked production of MCP-1 (). Because CAY10410 has an identical structure to 15d-PGJ
2 except for the electrophilic carbon, the fact that CAY10410 lacks the effects of 15d-PGJ
2 strongly suggests that the electrophilic centers present in CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 are critical for mediating their maximal anti-inflammatory therapeutic potential. CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2, but not rosiglitazone or CAY10410, significantly inhibited IL-1
β-induced NF-
κB activity ().
The molecular targets of CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 in inflammation are not completely known. 15d-PGJ
2 can bind to the NF-
κB components I
κB and p65 [
50]. Another candidate is the transcription factor Nrf2, which regulates anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory pathways. CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2 activate Nrf2 in mouse cells and human cancer cells [
51,
52]. However, these compounds do not activate Nrf2 in human lung fibroblasts [
27,
53]. We have previously reported that CDDO activates AP-1 transcriptional activity in human lung fibroblasts [
27]. However, AP-1 is a promoter, rather than an inhibitor of inflammation, and AP-1 activation leads to upregulation of IL-6 via NF-
κB [
54]. We hypothesize that these electrophilic compounds suppress inflammation and activate AP-1 via different pathways, and that the anti-inflammatory effects are stronger and override the potentially proinflammatory effects of AP-1 activation.
In addition to PPAR
γ-independent effects, PPAR
γ ligands have anti-inflammatory effects that are moderated via a PPAR
γ-dependent mechanism. This PPAR
γ-dependent mechanism can be accessed by TZDs such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone [
9,
55–
57], and indeed, rosiglitazone has limited anti-inflammatory properties in this report. However, while TZDs are currently used clinically as insulin sensitizers in type 2 diabetes, they have a complex sideeffect profile including edema, weight gain, bone weakness, and potentially an increased risk of cardiovascular disease [
58–
60], that may limit their widespread use as anti-inflammatory therapies. Although TZDs have high binding affinity for PPAR
γ they lack electrophilic centers and are thus unable to access PPAR
γ-independent anti-inflammatory pathways that use this mechanism [
27,
49,
61,
62]. We suggest that additional research on the PPAR
γ-independent anti-inflammatory activities of CDDO and 15d-PGJ
2, including identification of additional targets beyond NF-
κB, should lead to development of novel compounds with greater specificity for the anti-inflammatory targets of PPAR
γ ligands but decreased binding of PPAR
γ itself, with fewer resulting side-effects. As CDDO is orally active, has a long half-life, and is currently in clinical trials as an anticancer therapy, it may be a useful platform for derivatization and further study. Further development of small compounds with strong electrophilic centers is warranted as these drugs may be effective anti-inflammatory treatments for human lung diseases.