|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Class IA phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) are heterodimeric enzymes composed of a p85 regulatory and a p110 catalytic subunit that induce the formation of 3-polyphosphoinositides, which mediate cell survival, division, and migration. There are two ubiquitous PI3K isoforms p110α and p110β that have nonredundant functions in embryonic development and cell division. However, whereas p110α concentrates in the cytoplasm, p110β localizes to the nucleus and modulates nuclear processes such as DNA replication and repair. At present, the structural features that determine p110β nuclear localization remain unknown. We describe here that association with the p85β regulatory subunit controls p110β nuclear localization. We identified a nuclear localization signal (NLS) in p110β C2 domain that mediates its nuclear entry, as well as a nuclear export sequence (NES) in p85β. Deletion of p110β induced apoptosis, and complementation with the cytoplasmic C2-NLS p110β mutant was unable to restore cell survival. These studies show that p110β NLS and p85β NES regulate p85β/p110β nuclear localization, supporting the idea that nuclear, but not cytoplasmic, p110β controls cell survival.
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) family is divided into four groups (IA, IB, II, and III) according to structural features and substrate specificity. Of these, only class I enzymes catalyze the production of PI(3,4,5)P3 and PI(3,4)P2 in vivo. Class IA PI3Ks are heterodimeric proteins consisting of a p110 catalytic subunit (p110α, p110β, and p110δ) and an associated p85 regulatory subunit (p85α, p85β, and p55γ) (14, 18, 21, 22, 53). p110γ (class IB PI3K) is structurally similar but associates with a distinct class of regulatory subunits. The catalytic subunits p110α and p110β are expressed ubiquitously, whereas p110δ and p110γ are more abundant in hematopoietic cells (14, 44, 53).
Despite the similarity in sequence, expression patterns, and regulatory subunits, p110α and p110β have distinct functions in cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and development (5, 6, 12, 26, 32–35, 47). p110α has a key role in insulin action and cell cycle entry (12, 13), whereas p110β is reported to play a pivotal role in DNA replication, S phase progression, and DNA repair (32, 34, 35). Activating mutations of p110α, but not of p110β, have been found in human cancer; nonetheless, p110β drives tumorigenesis in PTEN-defective cells and induces focus formation in fibroblasts (8, 9, 26, 29). Moreover, overexpression of p110β is found in specific tumor types (7, 54, 58). Previous studies showed that part of the specific functions of p110α and p110β result from their distinct subcellular localization and activation requirements (34, 35), highlighting the emergence of subcellular localization as a major mechanism to govern cell responses (30). Previous reports showed that p85/p110 complex can translocate to the nucleus regulating cell survival, particularly in neuronal cell lines (37). In addition, p110β, but not p110α, localizes to the nucleus in several cell types. The mechanisms controlling p110β intracellular localization nonetheless remain elusive. We studied here the mechanism by which p110β localizes to the nucleus. p110β is unable to enter the nucleus as a monomer and requires association with the p85β regulatory subunit. We identified a nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the p110β C2 domain that controls the translocation of p85β/p110β complexes to the nucleus. Conversely, the export of the p85β/p110β heterodimer from the nucleus is regulated by a nuclear export sequence (NES) in p85β. We show that nuclear, but not cytoplasmic, p110β regulates cell viability.
Murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were prepared as reported elsewhere (15). The cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (Gibco-BRL, Auckland, New Zealand) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, 100 U of penicillin/ml, and 100 μg of streptomycin/ml. PC12, U2OS, NIH 3T3, SAOS-2, and HeLa cell lines were maintained as described previously (35).
Untagged wild-type (WT) p110β was donated by B. Vanhaesebroeck (Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom). pSG5-myc-p110α, pSG5-myc-p110β, and mutant myc-K805R-hp110β have been described in another study (34). NLS-myc-p110β-mutant1, -mutant2, and -mutant3, as well as NESmut rp85β, were generated by using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with appropriate oligonucleotides. pSG5-p85α and -HA-p85β are described elsewhere (2). The p85β-α chimera was prepared by replacing p85β residues 77 to 351 with the corresponding p85α sequence. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against murine PI3K subunits and control-scrambled shRNA were custom-made (Origene Technologies, Rockville, MD). shRNA-resistant WT and mutant p110β were human cDNA.
Blots were probed with the following antibodies (Abs): anti-Myc tag (9B11), anti-p-PKB Ser473, and anti-p-PKB Thr308 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA); anti-pan-p85, anti-p85α, and anti-histones (Upstate Biotechnology; Millipore, Billerica, MA); and anti-tubulin (GTU-88; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). anti-p110α was donated by A. Klippel (Merck, Boston, MA). Anti-cytochrome c was purchased from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA), anti-HA was from Covance (Emeryville, CA), and anti-p85β is described elsewhere (I. Cortés and A. C. Carrera, unpublished data). Alexa 488- and Cy3-labeled Abs were from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary Abs were from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark), and ECL was from GE Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Leptomycin B and cycloheximide were from Sigma. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and nerve growth factor (NGF) were purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ).
Western blotting (WB) and immunoprecipitation were performed as described previously (39). For immunofluorescence (IF), cells were plated on coverslips and fixed with 4% formaldehyde (10 min, room temperature [RT]), permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) staining buffer (10 min), and incubated with blocking buffer (0.1% Triton X-100-3% bovine serum albumin in PBS; 30 min), followed by incubation with primary antibody (1 h, RT, with end-to-end rocking). Cells were washed three times with blocking buffer to remove unbound antibody and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (1:500, 1 h, RT). Samples were washed three times with blocking buffer, followed by incubation with the mounting medium Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA). DAPI (4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole) was used to stain the DNA. Images were captured in a Leica Leitz DMRB microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) using an Olympus DP70 charge-coupled device camera or by using a confocal fluorescence microscope with an Olympus FluoView (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Human myc-p110β WT or mutant 1 (C2 domain) and mouse HA-p85β cDNA were transcribed and translated in vitro in the presence of [35S]methionine using the TNT T7-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega, Southampton, United Kingdom). In vitro binding of proteins was analyzed by immunoprecipitation of hemagglutinin (HA) or myc tags. The kinase assays were performed as described previously (27).
Transfection assays were performed by using JetPei-NaCl according to the manufacturer's protocols (Qbiogene, Irvine, CA). Transfected cells were cultured 48 h prior to analysis. For subcellular fractionation (see Fig. 1 and and4),4), cells were cultured in exponential growth and then collected. Cytoplasmic, nuclear, and chromatin fractions were isolated as described previously (40). Buffer A, used for cytoplasmic extraction, consisted of 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.34 M sucrose, 10% glycerol, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). The nonsalt buffer for nuclear extraction was composed of 3 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM EGTA, and 1 mM DTT; for chromatin, proteins were extracted after boiling and sonicating samples in Laemmli buffer. In all chases, samples were quantified with a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and the same amount of protein was analyzed by WB. For apoptosis and cytochrome c release, we transfected cells with different shRNAs in combination with rp85β and either WT p110β or NLS-p110β-mutant1 (24 h). Cells were gamma-irradiated (MARK 1; Shephard, Louisville, KY) using a 137Cs probe, collected after 24 h, and analyzed by flow cytometry in a Cytomics FC500 (Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA) using annexin V and propidium iodide. Cytochrome c release was examined by using WB.
Models of the full-length p110β associated with the p85β fragment containing nSH2 and iSH2 domains were independently created by using I-TASSER (60), and their qualities were evaluated with the Swiss-MODEL server (3). The two models were structurally aligned to the corresponding chains in the crystal structure of the p85α(nSH2-iSH2)/p110α complex (PDB 3hhm ) in order to generate a draft model of the complex. This structural alignment was generated with the Dali system (19). Finally, the model of the complex was refined by molecular dynamics to remove clashes between chains, etc. Molecular dynamics analysis was performed using GROMACS (52).
The fluorescence intensity was quantitated using ImageJ software; to determine the nuclear signal, we selected the area and calculate the pixels referred to those found in the entire cell. Error bars represent the standard deviations of the mean values compared. Statistical significance was evaluated with a Student t test and the chi-square test calculated using Prism5V.5.0 software. For NES and NLS sequence identification, we used online databases (one at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/databases/NESbase, CBS [Technical University of Denmark], and one at http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/db/NLSdb, Columbia University, respectively).
Most of the research on inositide-dependent signal transduction pathways has focused on events that take place at the plasma membrane. Nonetheless, PI3K is also found in the nucleus (36, 38, 43); we previously reported that p110β, but not p110α, localizes at the cell nucleus concentrating at this site in S phase in NIH 3T3 cells (35). HeLa cells, primary MEFs, and SAOS-2 cells also contained nuclear p110β, as determined by IF analysis (Fig. 1A).
We also analyzed the localization of the other endogenous ubiquitous PI3K subunits in NIH 3T3 cells. Whereas p110β was predominantly nuclear, p110α localized mainly in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1B), as reported previously (35). The Abs used were shown to be specific, since the p110α or p110β IF signal decreased following depletion of the corresponding isoform (35). As for the p85 ubiquitous regulatory subunits, the majority of the p85α localized in the cytoplasm but p85β was more abundant in the nuclear compartment (Fig. 1B). To control antibody specificity, we cotransfected NIH 3T3 cells with shRNA for p85α or p85β and a green fluorescent protein (GFP) transfection reporter; cells transfected with p85α shRNA showed reduction of the p85α signal, whereas p85β-specific shRNA reduced the p85β signal (Fig. 1C).
In a complementary experiment, we confirmed intracellular localization for p85 and p110 subunits by cell fractionation and WB. We tested whether the distinct ubiquitous class IA PI3K subunits appeared in cytoplasmic, nuclear, or chromatin fractions (MEFs, HeLa cells, and NIH 3T3 cells) (Fig. 1D). Although a proportion of the different subunits appeared in the nucleus and the cytoplasm (visible in long exposures [data not shown]), p110β and p85β concentrated in the nucleus, in contrast to the cytoplasmic localization of p110α and p85α (Fig. 1D).
To determine the contribution of cell activation for p110β translocation to the nucleus, we examined various cell types (PC12, U2OS, and NIH 3T3) upon serum deprivation or after stimulation with growth factors (NGF, serum, and PDGF, respectively). Whereas p110α localization showed minor changes after cell stimulation in the three cell types, p110β was mainly nuclear even in quiescence and stimulation of PC12 and NIH 3T3 cells increased p110β fraction bound to chromatin (Fig. 2A).
To elucidate the structural features that determine p110β nuclear localization, we transfected full-length p110β into NIH 3T3 cells. Recombinant (r)p110β overexpression resulted in cytoplasmic accumulation of this protein (Fig. 2B). Transfection of Myc-tagged-rp110β yielded a similar result using anti-tag Ab for IF (data not shown). We confirmed that the entire sequence of the rp110β cDNA clones was correct. We also examined the localization of recombinant p110α, p85α, and p85β (rp110α, rp85α, and rp85β) in NIH 3T3 cells; rp110α and rp85α concentrated in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2C), similar to their endogenous counterparts (Fig. 1B). Overexpressed p85β showed diffuse cytoplasmic and nuclear staining (Fig. 2C), with a larger proportion of cytoplasmic protein compared to the endogenous protein (Fig. 1).
The ectopic cytoplasmic localization of recombinant p110β in cells could result from the accumulation of newly translated protein in the endoplasmic reticulum prior to translocation to the nuclei. To exclude this possibility, we transfected the rp110β and tested whether inhibition of de novo protein synthesis by cycloheximide treatment (5 h prior to IF analysis) facilitated the accumulation of rp110β to the nucleus. This was not the case; rp110β remained cytoplasmic after cycloheximide treatment, excluding that this fraction represents newly translated protein (Fig. 2C).
Class IA catalytic and regulatory subunits normally form heterodimers (16). We confirmed biochemically that p85α and p85β form complexes with either p110α or p110β (data not shown), as reported earlier (16). We examined the possibility that cytoplasmic accumulation of rp110β might result from the lack of sufficient associated regulatory subunit. To determine whether the ubiquitous regulatory subunits (p85α or p85β) were necessary for p110β nuclear localization, we cotransfected combinations of the ubiquitous catalytic and regulatory subunits.
Cotransfection of rp110α with rp85α or rp85β did not alter the cytoplasmic localization of rp110α, although rp85α was cytoplasmic and rp85β was cytoplasmic and nuclear (Fig. 3A). In contrast, cotransfection of rp110β with rp85β, but not with rp85α, yielded a significant proportion of nuclear rp110β (Fig. 3A). To analyze the contribution of endogenous p85 regulatory subunits in the nuclear localization of p110β, we analyzed its localization in WT or p85β-deficient MEFs. A moderate reduction in nuclear p110β was seen in p85β−/− MEFs (Fig. 3B), suggesting that other p110β-associated nuclear proteins (such as PCNA or Nbs1 [32, 35]) might facilitate p110β translocation to the nucleus in p85β-deficient cells. In contrast, acute reduction of p85β levels with shRNA (as in Fig. 1C) induced a significant decrease in p110β nuclear levels (Fig. 3C). Endogenous p85β thus regulates the nuclear entry of p110β.
The finding that p85β expression, but not that of p85α, induced p110β nuclear localization led us to examine the primary sequence of p85α and p85β to search for potential nuclear localization sequences (NLSs). We found a polybasic region between the BCR (Bcr homologous region) and the N-SH2 region of p85β (residues 77 to 351); this sequence was not present in p85α. To establish the contribution of this p85β region in the nuclear localization of p85β/p110β complexes, we constructed a p85β-α chimera, replacing p85β amino acids 77 to 351 with the corresponding residues in the p85α sequence (amino acids 77 to 363; see Fig. 3D). We cotransfected the rp85β-α chimera with rp110β and examined rp110β subcellular distribution. No difference was observed in rp110β nuclear localization when cotransfected with the p85β-α chimera or WT p85β; the p85β-α chimera continued to localize with p110β in the nucleus (Fig. 3D), similar to WT-rp85β (Fig. 3A). Quantification of the proportion of p110α and p110β nuclear signal (Fig. 3E) confirmed that rp110β can transit to the nucleus when cotransfected with rp85β; nonetheless, the polybasic sequence located between BCR and N-SH2 domains in p85β is not a NLS.
We sought potential NLSs in p110β that could explain the nuclear localization of p85β/p110β complexes and identified three putative NLS polybasic motifs in p110β, one in the C2 domain (residues 310 to 318; KVKTKKSTK), one in the Ras-binding domain (RBD; residues 149 to 154; RRKMRK), and one at the C terminus (residues 994 to 996; RRH) (Fig. 4A). To establish which of these motifs might be functional, we generated a structural model of the p85β(nSH2iSH2)/p110β complex (Fig. 4B) based on the p85α (nSH2iSH2)/p110α structure (33). This model showed that the basic motif in the C2 domain is located in a loop in close proximity to p85β; only the residues at the beginning and the end of the NLS are resolved in this structure (Fig. 4B). Alignment of this region in p110β and p110α primary structure (Fig. 4C), as well as examination of p85α/p110α structure (24, 33, 42), showed that most of this motif is lost in p110α. The other candidate motifs are not found near p85β and seem less likely to be affected by interaction with this protein (Fig. 4B).
We replaced several basic residues in each of the three motifs with nonbasic residues to generate the C2 domain NLS-p110β-mutant1 (KVNTTKSTK), RBD NLS-p110β-mutant2, and C-terminal NLS-p110β-mutant3 (RGH) (Fig. 4A). The expression levels of these constructs were similar (Fig. 4D). We tested whether any of these mutants, in combination with rp85β, was excluded from the nucleus. NIH 3T3 cells transfected with rp85β and the rp110βNLS mutants in the RBD and C-terminal domain showed minor differences compared to WT-rp110β; in contrast, the C2 domain NLS-p110β-mutant1 was cytoplasmic (Fig. 4E and F). This suggested that the KVKTKRSTK motif in the C2 domain acts as an NLS for p110β. Separation of cells expressing the NLS-p110β-mutant1 plus rp85β into cytoplasmic, nuclear, and chromatin fractions showed that WT-rp110β localized in nuclear and chromatin fractions and confirmed that mutation of the NLS-p110β-mutant1 is mainly cytoplasmic, similar to p110α (Fig. 4G).
We confirmed that mutation in the C2 domain does not affect association of in vitro-transcribed translated purified p110β to purified p85β (Fig. 4H). A similar association of rp110β or NLS-p110β-mutant1 with rp85β was confirmed in transfected NIH 3T3 cells (not shown). Moreover, there was no difference in kinase activity between WT or mutant1-rp110β (Fig. 4I). Thus, the C2 mutant associates with p85β similarly to WT-p110β and shows kinase activity but does not translocate to the nucleus.
We previously observed changes in the relative amount of nuclear p110β during cell cycle progression, suggesting that this molecule shuttles in and out of the nucleus (35). We studied the mechanism that controls p110β nuclear export. Various means of nuclear export have been documented (28); the most common mechanism is a conserved leucine-rich NES that binds the nuclear export protein Crm1 (11, 31). We used leptomycin B to inhibit Crm1 binding to the cargo proteins; this treatment results in retention of NES-containing proteins in the nucleus (11). NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with rp110α, rp110β, rp85α, or rp85β constructs and, after 24 h, the cells were treated with leptomycin B (5 ng/ml, 2 h). After leptomycin B treatment, only rp85β showed a notable increase in the amount of nuclear protein (Fig. 5A). This suggests that nuclear exit of p85β/p110β complex is mediated by an NES located in p85β via Crm1. The moderate enhancement of p110β nuclear localization after leptomycin B treatment might result from association to endogenous p85β.
To define the putative region containing the NES in p85β, we transfected the rp85β-α chimera described above and tested whether leptomycin B treatment affected its intracellular localization. Overexpressed p85β-α chimera localized to the cytoplasm and nucleus and responded to leptomycin B treatment by increasing its nuclear localization (Fig. 5B), similar to rp85β (Fig. 5A). A C-terminal deletion mutant in p85α (p65α) behaves as an oncogene (27); a similar deletion in p85β was reported in a tumor cell line (25). We prepared a similar C-terminal deletion mutant in p85β (p65β) lacking residues 562 to 723 of the C terminus and tested the effect of leptomycin B treatment on its subcellular localization; p65β behaved as did WT p85β (Fig. 5A and B). Indeed, transfection of rp110β plus rp85β, the p85β-α chimera, or rp65β, followed by leptomycin B treatment of cells, led to a comparable increase in p110β nuclear localization (Fig. 5A and C).
Thus, p85β regulates p110β nuclear import and export; however, neither p85β residues 77 to 351 nor the p85β C-terminal region (amino acids 562 to 723) control p85β/p110β nuclear exit.
To determine the p85β region involved in nuclear export, we used specific NES databases to search for conserved leucine-rich regions; this search rendered three potential NES motifs (Fig. 6A). One of these was found at residues 683 to 688, although these residues are absent in rp65β, a mutant that behaves like WT p85β after leptomycin B treatment. An alternative high score region was found at residues 214 to 229, which are absent in the rp85β-α chimera; since this chimera remains sensitive to leptomycin B treatment (Fig. 5), this motif is not a functional NES for p85β. Finally, a potential motif was indicated at residues 25 to 32. We generated a 100-amino-acid N-terminal deletion mutant of p85β (Δ100Np85β), as well as a double point mutation in this Leu-rich motif (L25 and L30; NESmut-p85β). Deletion or mutation of this region rendered p85β predominantly at the nucleus and unaffected by leptomycin B treatment (Fig. 6B), confirming that this region contains a functional Crm1-regulated NES sequence.
We examined the role of this region in p110β nuclear export. NIH 3T3 cells transfected with rp110β in combination with Δ100NT-p85β or with NESmut-p85β showed an increase in rp110β nuclear localization (Fig. 6C), confirming a contribution of p85β residues 25 to 32 in the regulation of p85β/p110β nuclear export.
Mice deficient in p110β die at embryonic days 2 to 3 (5). We previously showed that p110β is mainly nuclear and controls DNA replication and repair (32, 34, 35); in the course of these studies, we observed that efficient p110β knockdown reduced cell survival (34). To test whether p110β nuclear localization influences cell survival, we depleted NIH 3T3 cells of p110β using shRNA and reconstituted p110β expression with WT-rp110β or cytoplasmic NLS-p110β-mutant1. WB was used to confirm p110β silencing with specific shRNA, as well as the expression of WT or mutant rp110β (Fig. 7A). We cotransfected cells with p110β-specific shRNA and shRNA-resistant humanWT-p110β or shRNA-resistant human NLS-p110β-mutant1; the second combination was more sensitive to spontaneous and gamma-irradiation-induced apoptosis than untransfected cells or rp110β WT-expressing cells (Fig. 7B).
As an alternative method to examine apoptosis, we monitored cytochrome c release in WB. Cytochrome c was present in the cytoplasmic fractions of apoptotic positive control cells (H2O2 treated), as well as in cells lacking p110β expression, but not in controls (Fig. 7C). Expression of shRNA-resistant WT-p110β nonetheless rescued cell death, since it decreased cytochrome c release; in contrast, expression of the shRNA-resistant cytoplasmic C2-domain NLS-p110β-mutant1 did not reduce cytochrome c release (Fig. 7C). The results indicate that nuclear localization of p110β is necessary for cell viability and that its expression in the cytoplasm does not prevent apoptotic events.
We examined the structural features that determine p110β nuclear localization. Whereas overexpressed recombinant p110β remains mainly cytoplasmic, transfected rp110β in combination with rp85β, but not rp85α, localizes to the nucleus. Although the ubiquitous catalytic and regulatory subunits form all possible heterodimeric combinations (16), only p85β/p110β complexes localize efficiently in the nucleus. The search for nuclear localization motifs in p85β and p110β yielded several candidate sequences, but only mutation of the NLS located within the p110β C2 domain significantly reduced p110β nuclear localization. The fact that p110β alone does not enter the nucleus suggests that p110β must associate with p85β for its NLS motif to be functional; the predicted quaternary structure of p85β/p110β reported here supports this possibility (see below). p110β nuclear PI3K activity is maximal in S phase (35), suggesting that p85β/p110β complexes shuttle in and out of the nucleus. We identify here a functional NES in p85β which, when deleted, increases p85β/p110β nuclear localization.
Proteins enter the nucleus through nuclear pores, large macromolecular complexes composed of nucleoporins. Understanding of macromolecular transport processes across the nuclear envelope has increased in recent years, and many transport receptors have been identified. Most of these receptors are similar to the import receptor importin β (karyopherin β). Members of this family have been classified as importins or exportins, and both types are regulated by the GTPase Ran. Importins recognize their substrates in cytoplasm and transport them to the nucleus; once in the nucleus, RanGTP binds to importins, inducing the release of import cargoes. In contrast, exportins interact with their substrates only in the nucleus in the presence of RanGTP and release them after GTP hydrolysis in the cytoplasm (reviewed in reference 49). Nuclear import and export are multistep processes initiated by the recognition of NLSs or NESs. The most thoroughly examined import signal (“classical” and bipartite NLS) contains multiple basic residues. Their transport is mediated by importin β, which directly associates these NLS via the adaptor protein importin α (49). The functional NLS in p110β is homologous to that found in class II PI3KC2α, which also transits to the nucleus (10), suggesting potential conservation of structural features for nuclear import between PI3K classes.
The best-studied exportins are Crm1/Xpo1, which recognizes leucine-rich NES. Crm1 forms a stable ternary complex with Ran-GTP and with NES cargoes that can exit the nucleus. Studies of Crm1-mediated export were aided by the discovery of the antifungal agent leptomycin B, a highly specific and potent inhibitor of Crm1 function (11). Of the three potential NES sequences in p85β, only the one located at the N terminus regulated the nuclear localization of p85β/p110β. In the p85β/p110β complex, p110β therefore contributes by providing the NLS, whereas p85β supplies a functional NES, showing that this complex acts as a single entity for nuclear transport. Indeed, the predicted structure of p85β/p110β described here (based on that in reference 33) shows that the NLS sequence in the C2 domain is in close proximity to p85β, supporting the possibility that p110β association to p85β alters p110β structure in this region to yield a functional NLS.
Neither p110β nor p85β is exclusively nuclear; the cytoplasmic forms might represent complexes with p85α and p110α, respectively, or p85β/p110β complexes in transit from both compartments. In the case of p85β, its overexpression renders a fraction of this protein nuclear, suggesting that it associates with other NLS-containing proteins. In support of this possibility, p85α and, to a greater extent, p85β, associates with X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), modulating the nuclear localization of this transcription factor (which contains an NLS) (46, 59). Similarly, in the case of p110β, association with p85β is critical for its translocation to the nucleus; however, other p110β-associated nuclear proteins (such as PCNA or Nbs1 [32, 35]) might facilitate the translocation of p110β to the nucleus in p85β-deficient cells.
We focused on a comparison of the class IA PI3K isoforms p110α and p110β; there is nonetheless an additional class IA isoform, p110δ, as well as the closely related class IB p110γ isoform, which associates with p101 and p84 regulatory subunits (50). When overexpressed in HepG2 cells, p110γ localizes to the nucleus after serum treatment; in this case, interference of p110γ association with p101 increases p110γ nuclear localization (41). There is no region homologous to that of the p110β C2 domain in p110γ (45), although we found polybasic motifs in the N terminus, in the helical domain, and at the beginning of the C2 domain (data not shown). Alignment of the NLS region in p110β and p110α (Fig. 4) shows that most of this basic motif in p110β is lost in p110α. Comparison of the p85α/p110α structure (24, 33, 42) to the p85β/p110β structural prediction described here (Fig. 4) also shows that the loop in which p110β NLS localizes is much shorter in p110α. These observations might explain why a large proportion of p110β, but not of p110α, localizes to the nucleus. An in silico search for p110β NLS homologues in p110δ, as well as p110δ structure (4), showed a similar polybasic region in p110β and p110δ C2 domains; further study is needed to define whether the p110δ motif is a functional NLS.
The first report of nuclear PIP3 showed rapid translocation of a PIP3-binding protein (PIP3BP), which is abundant in brain, to the nuclei of the rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cell line after NGF treatment, as well as in PDGF-treated NIH 3T3 cells (51). In human promyelocytic HL60 cells, both retinol and vitamin D3 induced differentiation to granulocytes or monocytes, respectively, and triggered an increase in nuclear p85 staining (reviewed in references 36 and 37). In all of these cases, the authors defined the specific isoform localizing to the nucleus. The negative regulator of PI3K, PTEN, is also reported to transit to the nucleus and regulate cell survival (17). In the case of nuclear PI3K in PC12 cells, a nucleus-specific phospholipase C activates a neuron-specific GTPase, PIKE (phosphoinositide 3-kinase enhancer), which is able to increase nuclear PI3K activity (56, 57). Isolated nuclei from PC12 cells treated with NGF or transfected with active PI3K were resistant to DNA fragmentation factor caspase-activated DNase (DFF40/CAD); interference with p110α diminished NGF protection from apoptosis, supporting p110α control of nuclear PIP3 in PC12 cells (1).
The antiapoptotic function of nuclear PIP3 in PC12 cells is proposed to result from PIP3 binding to B23 nucleophosmin, a protein that inhibits DFF40/CAD (20, 55). Other authors have suggested that nuclear PKB function in NGF-treated PC12 cells is mediated by PKB phosphorylation of acinus, resulting in acinus inhibition of apoptotic chromatin condensation (23). A third mechanism has been reported for the function of nuclear PI3K in NGF-treated PC12 cells, PCKζ-PI3K-dependent nuclear translocation, which mediates phosphorylation of nucleolin, a stabilizing agent for the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 (48). These results indicate that in some cell types (PC12 cells), the neurotrophin NGF activates nuclear PI3K, which in turn induces cell survival.
We report here that the p85β/p110β complex localizes to the nucleus in several cell types. This translocation is regulated by an NLS sequence in the p110β C2 domain and by an NES in the p85β N-terminal domain. Our results demonstrate that the p85β/p110β complex regulates cell viability only when it is correctly localized at the cell nucleus.
We thank M. White for the myc-p110α plasmid, B. Vanhaesebroeck for the p110β plasmid, A. Klippel for anti-p110 Ab, F. Pazos for support in p85β/p110β structure prediction, and C. Mark for editorial assistance.
A.K. held a predoctoral fellowship associated with a project financed by the Fundación Ramón Areces. J.R.-M. has a JAE postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). V.P.-G received a predoctoral FPI fellowship associated with a project financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN). This study was financed by grants from the Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC), the MICINN (SAF2007-63624 and SAF2010-21019 and Network of Cooperative Research in Cancer RD07/0020/2020), the Madrid regional government (S-BIO-0189/06), the Sandra Ibarra Foundation, and Genoma España.
Published ahead of print on 7 March 2011.