In 1989, Shimizu et al.
3 described 32 elderly patients with isolated, whitish papules over the back of the neck, and he termed this as "white fibrous papulosis of the neck". The lesions were characterized histologically by fibrosis of the papillary dermis and in some cases, mild alterations of the elastic fiber network. A few years later, a similar entity was reported by Rongioletti and Rebora
2, who described two cases of acquired elastolysis of the papillary dermis that simulated PXE without fibrotic change. This condition consisted of confluent, yellowish papules that formed cobblestone plaques on the necks of the two elderly women. Yet many previously published studies support the theory that WFPN and PXE-PDE are variants of a single disorder
1,4,5. The latter is different from PXE histologically by the diffuse changes of wavy, irregularly shaped and granular elastic fibers with calcium deposition in the reticular dermis. Balus et al.
1 first proposed the name "fibroelastic papulosis of the neck" in 1997 because the two entities are similar for the pathological presentation, which is characterized by focal fibrosis and loss of elastic fibers in the upper reticular and papillary dermis. But there are several clinical differences between WFPN and PXE-PDE. WFPN is characterized by isolated, whitish papules in patients who are 39~80 years of age, this is mainly found in Japanese males and rarely in European females, while those papules of PDE are yellowish and they often coalesce to form cobblestone plaque in females who are 63~80 years of age. The major histological feature of WFPN is a papillary dermal fibrosis with few elastic fibers, while PXE-PDE shows papillary dermal electrolysis without dermal fibrosis. However, there is considerable overlap between the clinical and histological features of these two entities
1. Our case was a Korean young man with multiple yellowish to skin colored papules with a cobble stone appearance, the histology was similar to that of WFPN and it showed dermal fibrosis and decreased elastic fibers.
The pathogenesis of FEPN has been suggested to be a manifestation of intrinsic aging
5 because FEPN develops in older persons with no inflammatory process
6,7. The immunohistochemical study of the neck skin from 4 Japanese patients with PXE-PDE, along with both aged and young healthy control subjects, showed the absence of elastin and fibrillin-1 in the papillary dermis of the affected individuals, the absence of fibrillin-1, but normal elastin in the aged control subjects, and intact staining for both elastin and fibrillin-1 in the younger control subjects
8. Fibrillin-1 is absent and elastin is decreased in the papillary dermis of photoaged skin with solar elastosis
9, suggesting that a photoaging mechanism is related in some cases.
We think that the intrinsic aging mechanism is not a sufficient explanation for FEPN in this case. We suggest that mild folliculitis or adnexal inflammation might be related to the pathogenesis of FEPN on the basis of the following clinicopathological findings. This case developed on the neck of a 28-year-old young man with history of mild folliculitis for many years. Decreased numbers of oxytalan and elastic fibers were noted at the same location as the dermal fibrosis, suggesting that the local elastolysis was associated with dermal fibrosis. Fibrosis surrounding the sebaceous glands was noted in the deeper sequential sections. Incidentally noted was the infiltration of a few lymphocytes and plasma cells in the deep dermis, which might be related with folliculitis or sweat gland inflammation.
Immunohistochemical study for elastin and tropoelastin showed decreased amounts in the nodular fibrotic area in the upper dermis, as well as in the dermal-epidermal junction. These histological findings suggested, although not conclusively, that the FEPN in this case might be related with the inflammatory process of skin adnexa, followed by dermal fibrosis and the loss of elastic fibers.
Many differential diagnoses exist for FEPN and they can be differentiated according to the clinicopathological findings. The most common differential diagnosis of FEPN is PXE1. PXE presents with skin lesions that may be similar in appearance to that of FEPN. The onset of PXE is usually evident by the second decade of life. In addition to skin papules, a major differentiating factor between the two is that the patients with PXE can have gastrointestinal, ocular and cardiovascular involvement, with angioid streaks being found almost universally in adults with PXE. In the lesional skin from patients with PXE, there is typical granular degeneration of the dermal elastic fibers on the elastic stains, and the ultrastructural appearance of the elastic fibers is strikingly different from that of FEPN
10. Other differential diagnoses include late-onset focal dermal elastosis
11, acquired middermal elastolysis
12, eruptive connective tissue nevi, dermatofibrosis lenticularis disseminata, eruptive xanthoma, trichodiscomas, juxtaclavicular beaded lines
13, amyloid elastosis
14 and lichen myxedematosus. The histological hallmark of FEPN is the absence or marked decrease of elastic tissue in the papillary dermis with or without dermal fibrosis. But not all the lesional skin demonstrates the characteristic absence of elastic fibers in the papillary dermis
15. Therefore, in some instances, multiple biopsy specimens may be necessary to make a diagnosis because of the lack of uniformity in the histology. Ultrastructural studies can be also helpful to understand the histopathological mechanisms of FEPN. The broad term 'fibroelastic papulosis' (FEP) is more appropriate than FEPN because FEP can occur in other sites as well.
To date, no successful treatments have been reported for FEPN, PXE-PDE or WFPN. One hypothetic therapeutic approach could be to administer topical antioxidant to inhibit the intrinsic free-radical induced aging.
Yong Beom Choe, M.D., Kyu Joong Ahn, M.D., and Kyae Yong Song, M.D.1
