PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Expert Opin Drug Discov. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3124776
NIHMSID: NIHMS280230

Green Tea Polyphenols in drug discovery - a success or failure?

Abstract

Green tea is made from unfermented dried leaves from Camellia sinensis and has been consumed by humans for thousands of years. For nearly as long, it has been used as a folk remedy for a wide array of diseases. More recently, a large number of in-vitro and in-vivo scientific studies have supported this ancient contention that the polyphenols from green tea can provide a number of health benefits. Since these compounds are clearly safe for human consumption and ubiquitous in the food supply, they are highly attractive as lead compounds for drug discovery programs. However, as drugs, they are far from optimum. They are relatively unstable, poorly absorbed, and readily undergo a number of metabolic transformations by intestinal microbiota and human enzymes. Further, since these compounds target a wide array of biological systems, in-vivo testing is rather difficult since effects on alternative pathways need to be carefully eliminated. The purpose of this review is to discuss some of the challenges and benefits of pursuing this family of compounds for drug discovery.

1. Introduction

Green tea is a significant source of a type of flavonoids called catechins (Figure 1): including epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), epigallocatechin (EGC), epicatechin gallate (ECG), and epicatechin (EC). One 200 ml cup of green tea supplies 140, 65, 28, and 17 mg of these polyphenols, respectively 1. There has been growing interest in EGCG since it has been suggested to decrease cholesterol levels 2, act as an antibiotic (e.g. 3, 4 ) and anticarcinogen (e.g. 5, 6, repress hepatic glucose production 7, and may enhance insulin action 8, 9. The exact mechanism of action of EGCG with regard to a number of these effects is not entirely clear. There continues to be a strong interest in clinical applications for these compounds as demonstrated by the fact that there are currently over 37 active clinical trials involving EGCG.

Figure 1
Structure of the four major polyphenols found in green tea. Also noted are the EC50 values for inhibition of purified GDH.

1.1 EGCG undergoes rapid auto-oxidation in solution

One significant problem with the tea catechins is their reactivity and instability under physiological and experimental conditions. Polyphenols such as the tea catechins are effective scavengers for superoxide anion radicals ( equation M1) and hydroxyl radicals (OH). However, catechins themselves are easily oxidized by dioxygen that can produce active oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and equation M2. Cupric ions (Cu2+) exacerbate autoxidation and can also yield some potentially cytotoxic quinones as side products. Previous studies have shown that the first step of this autoxidation is the one-electron oxidation of the catechins to generate an equation M3 and a semiquinone that effectively quenched by H+ and superoxide dismutatase 10. However, the scavenging of the H2O2 in-vivo would require peroxidase or catalase since it reacts poorly with the catechins.

This reactivity can complicate in-vitro studies since EGCG has a half-life of less than 30 minutes in common cell culture media 11. EGCG forms dimers with a maximum at 30–60 min but then all monomeric and dimeric species disappear within six hours 12. Polymerization is superoxide-mediated and since superoxide dismutase (SOD) stabilizes EGCG. However, when SOD is added, an appreciable amount of epimerized EGCG, GCG, is formed. Some of these reactions may occur more slowly in tissue since the partial pressure of oxygen is ~1/4 that of cell culture and animal tissue has high levels of SOD, glutathione, and ascorbic acid 12. It is important to also note that during EGCG oxidation, phenolic radicals, superoxide radicals, and hydrogen peroxide can be formed. These oxidation side products can themselves trigger a number of cellular responses. For example, the effects of EGCG on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation was abrogated by the addition of SOD, suggesting that in this case it was the side products of EGCG oxidation rather than EGCG itself that was inducing the cellular effect 13.

1.2 EGCG is rapidly metabolized in-vivo

One major problem with the polyphenols is that they are poorly absorbed when administered orally. Their high solubility makes for poor membrane permeability and their reactive nature makes them unstable in the gut. Gut microbes also cause extensive degradation. Finally, there is significant efflux from of these polyphenolic compounds from cells 14. For a detailed review, see Feng, 2006 15. Once absorbed, EGCG, like other polyphenols, is modified by sulfation, glucuronidation, and methylation before catabolism and excretion. Rats have the shortest serum half-life for EGCG while mice and humans are essentially the same. However, it has been suggested that EGCG in the serum is mostly unconjugated in humans 16 while it is mostly in the conjugated form in mice 17. Glucuronidation greatly increases the clearance rate from the serum. There have been numerous studies examining the pharmokinetics of EGCG in mice, rats, and humans (For a review see 18). In mice, more than a third of the administered EGCG is excreted in feces in the first 24 hours 19. The level of EGCG found in the major organs was found to be ~1/10 that found in the serum. Most interestingly, this includes the brain, suggesting that EGCG passes through the blood-brain barrier. There have been a number of studies on the pharmacokinetics of these polyphenols in humans (e.g. 16, 2023). In general, EGCG and EGC are absorbed at levels of 0.2–2.0% and 0.2–1.3%, respectively. This absorption efficacy is essentially the same whether administered as purified compounds or as a mixture (i.e. Polyphenon E) 24. EGCG is methylated in-vivo by human liver cytosolic catechol-O-methyltransferease (COMT) 25 that can negate at least some of its activity (e.g. 26). Interestingly, it has been reported that lower COMT activity in individuals correlates with more efficacious protection against breast cancer afforded by green tea extracts 27.

With regard to both the auto-oxidation and the in-vivo modifications, acetylation of the phenolic alcohol groups may be very useful in the pharmacological application of the tea catechins. Perhaps the most famous example of this is the acetylation of salicylic acid with acetic anhydride to form aspirin. This modification makes the compounds more hydrophobic and helps to block phase II biotransformation or oxidative degradation 28. Acetylated EGCG is deactylated once taken up by various cell lines and studies on intragastic administration of acetylated EGCG showed that modification increased serum levels of EGCG 2.8–4.3 fold with an increased the half-life in the intestinal tract by 4–6 fold 29.

1.3 Tea polyphenols target a wide array of biological systems

There have been numerous potential therapeutic targets identified for the tea polyphenols. For brevity, only some of those with IC50’s in the submicromolar range will be noted here. Tea polyphenols inhibit several proteases including matrix metalloproteinases (2, 9 and 12; 30) and the 20S proteasome 31. The former has implications in tumor invasion and metastasis and the latter in tumor apoptosis. Tea catechins have been shown to inhibit dihydrofolate reductase much like the antineoplastic drug methotrexate 32. With possible implications for the control of serum cholesterol, EGCG has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of squalene epoxidase 33. EGCG is not only modified in-vivo by human liver cytosolic catechol-O-methyltransferease, but is also a potent inhibitor of the enzyme 25. Relatively few structures of enzymes complexed with tea catechins have been determined (e.g. 1JNQ, 3NG5, and 2KDH). In the case of troponin C 34 and transthyretin 35, EGCG binds at protein-protein interfaces. All of these studies clearly demonstrate that, even though EGCG is a strong anti-oxidant, and can affect such a wide array of cellular systems, its interactions with a particular enzyme can be highly specific and independent of its inherent chemical activity. It should be noted, however, that sometimes the diverse activity of green tea polyphenols can be deleterious. For example, the polyphenols have been shown to block the anticancer effects of several chemotherapy agent 36. In spite of this, tea catechins, are often ignored in high throughput screens since the dogma is that they act by aggregating or denaturating target proteins.

1.4 EGCG as an inhibitor for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)

Our work has shown that EGCG has potential as an inhibitor of glutamate dehydrogenase activity. Hyperinsulinemia/hyperammonemia (HHS) is a genetic hypoglycemic disorder caused by loss of GTP inhibition 37. This loss of GTP regulation results in profound effects on several major organs. In the pancreas, afflicted children have increased β-cell responsiveness to leucine and susceptibility to hypoglycemia following high protein meals 38. This is likely due to uncontrolled catabolism of amino acids yielding high ATP levels that stimulate insulin secretion, causing severe hypoglycemia. In the liver and/or the kidneys, the hyperactive GDH catabolyzes glutamate, producing excessive ammonium. This hyperammonemia is further exacerbated by low glutamate concentrations that decrease N-acetyl-glutamate production that is a necessary activator for carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPS) for ureagenesis. While the hypoglycemia and hyperammonemia in HHS are sufficient to cause CNS damage, afflicted children have higher incidence of childhood-onset epilepsy, learning disabilities, and seizures independent of the hyperammonemia and hypoglycemia 39. This is likely due to the importance of glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid as neurotransmitters. HHS is currently treated by pharmaceutically controlling insulin secretion but this does not address the liver and CNS problems. Therefore, there is a significant need for a new inhibitor to directly block hyperactive HHS GDH.

Of the four major catechins found in green tea, only ECG and EGCG showed inhibitory activity against GDH (Figure 1). EGCG and ECG allosterically inhibit purified animal GDH in-vitro with an ED50 ~500nM. Since EC or EGC were not active against GDH, the anti-oxidant property of these catechins cannot be relevant to GDH inhibition. Further, none of these compounds aggregated or irreversibly denature the enzyme 40. Interestingly, ECG/EGCG inhibition complements the normal regulation of GDH. We have proposed that GDH is normally held in a ‘tonic’ state 41 where the preferred metabolism of carbohydrates and fats maintains a high GTP concentration in the mitochondria, thereby keeping GDH activity at a low level. GTP inhibition is released as the energy level drops and ADP concentrations rise. Similarly, ECG/EGCG inhibition is also abrogated by ADP 40. Therefore, the green tea polyphenols are likely not toxic to a normal individual since the ‘pressure release valve’, ADP, can overcome EGCG/ECG inhibition if the energy of the mitochondria drops to very low levels. Finally, with regard to application for HHS, EGCG inhibits HHS GDH mutants as effectively as wild type 40.

The next step was to ascertain EGCG activity in tissue (Figure 2). Mirroring what was found with purified enzyme, EGCG, but not EGC, blocked the GDH-mediated stimulation of insulin secretion by the β-cells. EGCG does not affect insulin secretion, glucose oxidation, or cellular respiration during glucose stimulation where GDH is known to not play a major role in the regulation of insulin secretion 40. In unpublished results, we have determined the structure of GDH complexed with EGCG and ongoing in-vivo studies on transgenic HHS mice are showing promise.

Figure 2
Effects of EGCG and EGC on GDH-mediated secretion of insulin from pancreatic β-cells in a perifusion assay. EGCG clearly blocks GDH-mediated, BCH stimulation of insulin secretion in a dose-dependent manner. Importantly, EGC, which was shown to ...

More recent studies have confirmed our observation that EGCG inhibits GDH in-situ and it may be useful in treating other diseases as well. The phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase/Akt pathway is enhanced in many human tumors and up-regulates glucose uptake and utilization. c-Myc, on the other hand, up-regulates glutamine utilization by increasing cell surface transporters and enzymes. At least in-vitro, the enhanced utilization of one of these carbon sources also makes the cells sensitive to its withdrawal. Using our results, DeBerardinis laboratory tested the effects of EGCG on glioblastoma cells. They demonstrated that EGCG sensitizes glioblastoma cells to glucose withdrawal and to inhibitors of Akt signaling and glycolysis 42. Indeed, EGCG addition mirrored the effects of knocking out GDH in the tissue.

Work from the Blenis group 43 also demonstrated EGCG inhibition of GDH activity may be useful in treating the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) disorder. The TSC disorder is characterized by benign tumors due to the loss of either TSC1 or TSC2 and the subsequent hyperactivation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Inhibitors of mTOR can decrease the size of TSC associated tumors, but only in a cytostatic manner. The TSC1/2 −/− cells are hypersensitive to glucose deprivation and highly dependent on GDH mediated catabolism of glutamine. Nearly all of the TSC1/2 −/− cells that were deprived of glucose and given rapamycin died upon administration of EGCG. As expected, EGCG effects was reversed if GDH mediated oxidation of glutamate was circumvented by the addition of 2-oxoglutarate, pyruvate, or aminooxyacetate. This is an exciting result since attempts to make glutamine analogs have only yielded toxic compounds.

2. Expert Opinion

It is clear that there are a number of interesting possible pharmaceutical applications for green tea catechins. However, there are a number of practical and scientific issues that are yet to be resolved. What is particularly attractive about these compounds is that are safe at very high doses. Once shown to be active against a particular target, it is logical to hope that one might expect to be able to move to clinical trials relatively quickly. Certainly, the low toxicity is highly advantageous in being able to rapidly test in-situ and in animal models. However, there are a number issues that impede using the catechins as pharmaceuticals. These highly soluble and reactive compounds are poorly absorbed in the gut and quickly eliminated by the liver. This can only be partially compensated by administering larger doses of material. On the more practical side, the wide array of targets makes it difficult to demonstrate a specific mode of action and to obtain approval for a particular use. In addition, the large number of false starts in their application has jaded the community. Pharmaceutical companies are similarly skeptical, with the added problem in that it is nearly impossible to protect the application of such freely available compounds from patent challenges. These issues have certainly plagued our work on using EGCG to treat HHS. Since HHS is an orphan disease, we had hoped that such a non-toxic compound could be rapidly used in the clinic to help treat this multi-organ disease. However, for all of these reasons, being able to get support for this application has been difficult. Nevertheless, in unpublished results, we have the atomic structure of the GDH/EGCG complex and evidence that they are working in-vivo in HHS transgenic mouse models. Therefore, we still are hopeful that either these compounds or their mimics might still be applicable for a number of diseases.

Whether the green tea polyphenols can be considered to be a success or failure is dependent upon whether the end application is a nutritional additive or a traditional pharmaceutical with a specific target and dosing regime. With regard to their use as a nutraceutical, a number of studies have suggested that they may be effective as prophylactics or as synergistic compounds with other treatment regimes. Used in this manner, these compounds have offered modest benefits with a number of different disorders. As pharmaceutical agents, these compounds have been highly successful in controlled experiments but have not resulted in clinical application. Tea polyphenols hold such great promise with regard to safety and ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. However, even with modifications to make them more stable pro-drugs, it seems unlikely that the stability and bioavailability issues can be sufficiently overcome. Therefore, as use as targeted pharmaceutical agents, these polyphenols cannot be considered a success at this time. However, they have been extremely useful in identifying new ligand binding sites on target proteins and their low toxicity allows for rapid confirmation of activity in-situ and in-vivo. In the end, perhaps this is how these catechins have lived up to expectations; by providing scaffolds for further drug design.

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest

TJ Smith is supported by NIH grant DK072171

References

1. Yang CS, Wang ZY. Tea and cancer. J National Cancer Inst. 1993;85:1038–49. [PubMed]
2. Maron DJ, Lu GP, Cai NS, et al. Cholesterol-lowering effect of a theaflavin-enriched green tea extract: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1448–53. [PubMed]
3. Hamilton-Miller JM. Antimicrobial properties of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2375–77. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Stolcov C, Saffari R, Houghton JM. Green tea inhibits Helicobacter growth in vivo and in vitro. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;33:473–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Katiyar SK, Mukhtar H. Tea in chemoprevention of cancer: epidemiologic and experimental studies. Int J Oncol. 1996;8:221–38. [PubMed]
6. Shanafelt TD, Call TG, Zent CS, et al. Phase I trial of daily oral polyphenon E in patients with asymptomatic Rai stage 0 to II chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncology. 2009;27:3808–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Waltner-Law ME, Wang XL, Law BK, et al. Epigallocatechin gallate, a constituent of green tea, represses hepatic glucose production. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:34933–40. [PubMed]
8. Anderson RA, Polansky MM. Tea enhances insulin activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:7182–86. [PubMed]
9. Baer DJ, Novotny JA, Harris GK, et al. Oolong tea does not improve glucose metabolism in non-diabetic adults. Eur J Clin Nutrition. 2011;65:87–93. [PubMed]
10. Mochizuki M, Yamazaki S, Kano K, et al. Kinetic analysis and mechanistic aspects of autoxidation of catechins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1569:35–44. [PubMed]
11. Hong J, Lu H, Meng X, et al. Stability, cellular uptake, biotransformation, and efflux of tea polyphenol (−) epigallocatechin-3-gallate in HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2002;62:7241–46. [PubMed]
12. Sang S, Lee M-J, Hou Z, et al. Stability of tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and formation of dimers and epimers under common experimental conditions. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:9478–84. [PubMed]
13. Hou Z, Sang S, You H, et al. Mechanism of action of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate: Auto-oxidation dependent inactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor and direct effects on growth inhibition in human esophageal cancer KYSE 150 cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:8049–56. [PubMed]
14. Chan KY, Zhang L, Zou Z. Intestinal efflux transport kinetics of green tea catechins in Caco-2 monolayer model. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2007;59:395–400. [PubMed]
15. Feng WY. Metabolism of green tea catechins: an overview. Curr Drug Met. 2006;7:755–809. [PubMed]
16. Lee MJ, Maliakal P, Chen L, et al. Pharmocokinetics of tea catechins after ingestion ofgreen tea an (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate by humans: formation of different metabolites and individual variabilty. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2002;11:1025–32. [PubMed]
17. Lambert JD, Lee M-J, Lu H, et al. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate is absorbed but extensively glucuronidated following oral administration to mice. Nutrient Metabolism. 2003;133:4172–77. [PubMed]
18. Manach C, Williamson G, Morand C, et al. Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:230S–42S. [PubMed]
19. Lee H, Bae JH, Lee S-R. Protective effect of green tea polyphenol EGCG against neuronal damage and brain edema after unilateral cerebral ischemia in gerbils. J Neuroscience Research. 2004;77:892–900. [PubMed]
20. Nakagawa K, Okuda S, Miyazawa T. Dose-dependent incorporation of tea catechins, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and (−)-epigallocatechin, into human plasma. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1997;61:1981–85. [PubMed]
21. Unno T, Kondo K, Itakura H, et al. Analysis of (−)-epigallocatechin gallate in human serum obtained after ingesting green tea. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1996;60:2066–68. [PubMed]
22. Pietta P, Simonetti P, Gardana C, et al. Relationship between rate and extent of catechin absorption and plasma antioxidant status. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1998;46:895–903. [PubMed]
23. Lee MJ, WANG Z-Y, LI H, et al. Analysis of plasma and urinary tea polyphenols in human subjects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995;4:393–99. [PubMed]
24. Chow H-HS, Cai Y, Alberts DS, et al. Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of Tea Polyphenols following Single-dose Administration of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Polyphenon E. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:53–58. [PubMed]
25. Chen D, Wang CY, Lambert JD, et al. Inhibition of human liver catechol-O-methyltransferase by tea catechins and their metabolites: structure-activity relationship and molecular-modeling studies. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005;69:1523–31. [PubMed]
26. Landis-Piwowar KR, Wan SB, Weigand RA, et al. Methylation suppresses the proteasome-inhibitory function of green tea polyphenols. J Cell Phys. 2007;213:252–60. [PubMed]
27. Wu AH, Yu MC, Tseng CC, et al. Green tea and risk of breast cancer in Asian Americans. Int J Cancer. 2003;106:574–79. [PubMed]
28. Liederer BM, Borchardt RT. Enzymes involved in the bioconversion of ester-based prodrugs. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95:1177–95. [PubMed]
29. Lambert JD, Sang S, Hong JJJ, et al. Peracetylation as a means of enhancing in-vitro bioactvity and bioavailability of epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Drug Metab & Dispos. 2006;34:2111–16. [PubMed]
30. Demeule M, Brossard M, Page M, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition by green tea catechins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1478:51–60. [PubMed]
31. Nam S, Smith DM, Dou QP. Ester bond-containing tea polyphenols potently inhibit proteasome activity in-vitro and in-vivo. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:13322–30. [PubMed]
32. Navarro-Peran E, Cabezas-Herrera J, Hiner ANP, et al. Kinetics of the inhibition of bovine liver dihydrofolate reductase by tea catechins: origin of slow-binding inhibition and pH studies. Biochemistry. 2005;44:7512–25. [PubMed]
33. Abe T, Seki T, Umehara K, et al. Green tea polyphenols: novel and potent inhibitors of squalene epoxidase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;268:767–71. [PubMed]
34. Robertson IM, Li MX, Sykes BD. Solution structure of human cardiac troponin C in complex with green tea polyphenol, (−)-epigallocatechin 3-gallate. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:23012–23. [PubMed]
35. Miyata M, Sato T, Kugimiya M, et al. The crystal structure of the green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin gallate-transthyretin complex reveals a novel binding site distinct from the thyroxine binding site. Biochemistry. 2010;49:6104–14. [PubMed]
36. Golden EB, YLP, Kardosh A, et al. Green tea polyphenols block the anticancer effects of bortezomib and other boronic acid-based proteasome inhibitors. Blood. 2009;113:5927–37. [PubMed]
37. Stanley CA, Lieu YK, Hsu BY, et al. Hyperinsulinism and hyperammonemia in infants with regulatory mutations of the glutamate dehydrogenase gene. New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338:1352–57. [PubMed]
38. Hsu BY, Kelly A, Thornton PS, et al. Protein-sensitive and fasting hypoglycemia in children with the hyperinsulinism/hyperammonemia syndrome. J Pediatr. 2001;138(3):383–89. [PubMed]
39. Bahi-Buisson N, Roze E, Dionisi C, et al. Neurological aspects of hyperinsulinism-hyperammonaemia syndrome. Dev Med & Child Neurol. 2008;50:945–49. [PubMed]
40. Li C, Allen A, Kwagh K, et al. Green Tea Polyphenols Modulate Insulin Secretion by Inhibiting Glutamate Dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:10214–21. [PubMed]
41. Smith TJ, Stanley CA. Untangling the glutamate dehydrogenase allosteric nightmare. Trends in Biological Chemistry. 2008;33:557–64. [PubMed]
42. Yang C, Sudderth J, Dang T, et al. Glioblastoma cells require glutamate dehydrogenase to survive impairments of glucose metabolism or Akt signaling. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7986–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Choo AY, Kim SG, Vander Heiden MG, et al. Glucose addiction of TSC null cells Is caused by failed mTORC1-dependent balancing of metabolic demand with supply. Molecular Cell. 2010;38:487–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]