PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
From:
Eur J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Eur J Neurosci. 2011 June; 33(11): 1961–1972.
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07696.x

Figure 8

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms284646f8.jpg

Functional properties of neurons in the barn owl Ipc. A) Switch-like suppression of unit responses by a distant, competing stimulus. The stimulus inside the receptive field (RF) was a looming dot (4°/s at 50% contrast). The stimulus outside the RF (Sout), presented simultaneously at a location 30° to the side of the RF center, was either a second 50% contrast looming dot of various speeds (red), a 4°/s looming dot of various contrasts (blue), or a broadband noise burst of various sound levels (green). B) Periodic burst responses of an Ipc unit to a looming dot centered in the RF. Gray zone: duration of the visual stimulus; dashed lines: analysis window for response periodicity. C) Distribution of the peaks in the response power spectrum for 57 Ipc units. Dashed line: mean frequency of response periodicity = 36 Hz. Data from Asadollahi et al., 2010.

Images in this article

  • Figure 1
  • Figure 2
  • Figure 3
  • Figure 4
  • Figure 5
  • Figure 6
  • Figure 7
  • Figure 8
  • Figure 9
Click on the image to see a larger version.