Recent biochemical evidence has implicated AIM2 in the recognition of, and innate immune response to cytosolic DNA
3–6. Recognition of cytosolic DNA by AIM2 activates the non-transcriptional inflammatory caspase-1 pathway in macrophages, leading to production of the potent inflammatory cytokines, IL-1β and IL-18, and cell death. We now provide genetic evidence that AIM2 is a critical PRR uniquely involved in the recognition and innate immune defense against infection with the potentially lethal intracellular pathogen
Francisella tularensis.
Several proteins of the NLR family are involved in the activation of the inflammatory caspase-1 pathway in macrophages in response to pathogenic infection or products
26–28. For example, NLRC4 (also called Ipaf) is a PRR involved in detection of intracellular infection with
Salmonella and activation of the caspase-1 pathway in response to this pathogen
18.
Salmonella flagellin is the suggested molecular component responsible for activation of NLRC4
29, 30. Another PRR, Nlrp1, is involved in activation of caspase-1 in response to stimulation with anthrax lethal toxin
15. In contrast, the NLR protein Nlrp3 (also called Nlrp3/cryopyrin) is involved in caspase-1 activation following infection with a broad range of bacterial, viral, or fungal pathogens, and in response to different stress stimuli
28, 31. Nevertheless, the mechanism by which Nlrp3 recognizes such a broad range of pathogens and stimuli is still unclear.
None of the above mentioned NLRs or other known NLRs, however, are involved in sensing
Francisella infection. Although macrophages from AIM2-deficient mice are not defective in sensing NLRC4, Nlrp1 and Nlrp3 stimuli, as evidenced by their normal caspase-1 activation response to
Salmonella, anthrax lethal toxin, or LPS plus ATP or nigericin, or MSU, they are clearly unable to activate caspase-1 in response to
Francisella infection. This suggests that
Francisella may have developed mechanisms to evade detection of their non-nucleic acid PAMPs by the host cell inflammasome components such as NLRC4, Nlrp1 or Nlrp3 and probably by other as yet uncharactarized inflammasomes. Nevertheless, several studies suggest that
Francisella infection activates TLR2 signaling via MyD88 leading to NF-κB-dependent transcriptional induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines
32–34. However, this response does not appear to be sufficient for activation of the Nlrp3 inflammasome because
Aim2−/− macrophages are completely defective in caspase-1 activation in response to infection with
Francisella.
Phagosomal disruption occurs during the escape of
Francisella from the phagosome into the cytosol
35–37. This may be necessary for activation of caspase-1 and type I interferon production by
Francisella because mutant strains that cannot disrupt the phagosome and escape into the cytosol are unable to induce type I interferons or activate caspase-1
10, 38. Despite previous observations of Nlrp3 inflammasome activation by phagosomal disruption
26, 39, 40, it is intriguing that phagosomal disruption during
Francisella escape does not lead to Nlrp3 inflammasome activation as evidenced by the absence of caspase-1 activation in
Francisella-infected AIM2-deficient macrophages. This defect in caspase-1 activation cannot be attributed to a defect in Nlrp3 signaling because these macrophages have normal amounts of caspase-1 activation in response to specific Nlrp3 stimuli such as LPS plus ATP or the pore forming toxin nigericin. Additionally, this defect is not likely due to a specific defect in
Francisella-induced phagosomal disruption since infection of the AIM2-deficient macrophages with
Francisella leads to even higher type I interferon production than that seen in wild-type macrophages, indicating normal phagosomal disruption and escape. Altogether, these observations suggest that phagosomal disruption generally does not induce Nlrp3 inflammasome activation and it is likely that a more specific stimulus or additional stimuli are required. Alternatively,
Francisella might possess means to inhibit Nlrp3 inflammasome activation during its escape from the phagosome.
AIM2 inflammasome activation requires direct interaction of AIM2 with DNA
3. This interaction leads to oligomerization of AIM2 and the formation of a large AIM2-DNA complex visible by confocal microscopy
3. Our results show that infection of macrophages with
Francisella also induces formation of a large AIM2-DNA complex, indicating that
Francisella infection delivers DNA into the cytosol that is then recognized by AIM2. The exact mechanism by which
Francisella delivers its DNA into the cytosol is currently unclear. Nevertheless, our results suggest that the DNA which activates AIM2, and likely type I interferon signaling, is produced by breakdown and digestion of killed
Francisella by phagosomal enzymes. Supporting this conclusion, bafilomycin which can prevent killing and degradation of bacteria in the phagosome by inhibiting the activity of vacuolar-type ATPases that mediate lumen acidification
25, 41, completely inhibited AIM2 inflammasome activation and IFN-β production in wild-type macrophages by
Francisella infection. Considering that bafilomycin does not prevent
Francisella phagosomal permeabilization and escape into the cytosol
35, phagosomal escape by live
Francisella and its replication in the cytosol is likely not the signal that activates AIM2 or type I interferon response. Rather killing and degradation of
Francisella and the subsequent phagosomal disruption triggered by live
Francisella escape is probably responsible for delivering
Francisella DNA into the cytosol for recognition by AIM2 and type I interferon-signaling pathways. As a consequence we expect that more virulent strains of
Francisella such as
F. tularensis subsp.
tularensis, which infects humans must have evolved mechanisms that protect them from phagosomal lysis, perhaps by altering the rate of acidification and maturation of their phagosomes
36. Therefore, these strains will be less efficiently detected by AIM2 due to decreased phagosomal release of killed bacterial DNA into the cytosol, and thereby would have a better chance of intracellular replication and an increased ability to cause a systemic infection.
IFN-β signaling through its IFNAR1 receptor is required for efficient caspase-1 activation by
Francisella
10, 26. IFNAR1- or IRF3-deficient macrophages, which exhibit impaired IFN-β production, showed less efficient caspase-1 activation by
Francisella compared to wild-type macrophages
10, 26. Our data show that the reduced caspase-1 activation by
Francisella in
Irf3−/− or
ifnar1−/− macrophages is not due to decreased AIM2 expression because these macrophages express comparable amounts of AIM2 as wild-type macrophages. Additionally,
Irf3−/− and
ifnar1−/−
42 macrophages exhibit normal caspase-1 activation in response to transfected DNA, ruling out the possibility that IFN-β signaling is required for transcriptional induction of a host factor critical for caspase-1 activation by the AIM2 inflammasome. Although both
Francisella and transfected DNA both activate the AIM2 inflammasome IFN-β signaling might be required for efficient killing of
Francisella in the phagosome and/or phagosomal permeablization and release of
Francisella DNA into the cytosol. Indeed,
ifnar1−/− macrophages harbor more bacteria 5–24h post-infection compared to wild-type macrophages, likely due to defective phagosomal bactericidal activity of the
ifnar1−/− macrophages. Consequently, these macrophages might produce less cytosolic DNA, which could provide a rationale for the observed defective AIM2 inflammasome activation in these macrophages.
Based on current information on the life cycle of
Francisella in macrophages
10, 26, 43, and our own data, we propose a two step mechanism by which
Francisella infection of macrophages activates the AIM2 inflammasome. Shortly after
Francisella enters the phagosome, the phagosome is rapidly acidified
17. Acidification causes lysis of some of the ingested bacteria and release of bacterial DNA into the lumen of the phagosome. During phagosomal escape of live
Francisella, which occurs as early as 1 h post-infection
16, 17, the phagosome is ruptured releasing both live
Francisella and undigested DNA of killed
Francisella into the cytosol. This amount of cytosolic DNA might not be sufficient for AIM2 activation, but is likely sufficient for activation of an as yet unknown DNA sensor, which in turn activates IRF3 leading to production of type I interferons such as IFN-β. Bafilomycin treatment completely inhibited
Francisella-induced IFN-β production, supporting this scenario. IFN-β binds to IFNAR1 resulting in the activation of this signaling pathway. This initial IFN-β signaling process acts like a positive feedback loop perhaps to increase phagosomal acidification and/or the bactericidal activity of the phagosomal enzymes thereby enhancing the release of more killed
Francisella DNA into the cytosol. This is supported by the observations that prior priming of wild-type or
Irf3−/− macrophages before infection with
Francisella, or infection of these macrophages with
Francisella together with IFN-β co-treatment accelerates and enhances AIM2 inflammasome activation, whereas inhibiting phagosomal acidification markedly reduces AIM2 inflammasome activation. In the second step of this process, the increased concentration of cytosolic DNA, as a result of IFN-β-induced phagosomal disruption, leads to full AIM2 activation by inducing its oligomerization. The oligomerized AIM2-DNA complex serves as a molecular platform to recruit ASC and facilitate its oligomerization into the large “ASC pyroptosome”
8. Consistently,
Francisella infection or transfection with cytosolic DNA induces ASC pyroptosome formation in wild-type but not
Aim2−/− macrophages, and can be completely blocked by ~120–180 mM extracellular KCl. It is likely that the ASC pyroptosome then activates procaspase-1 as described before
8, leading to pyroptotic cell death and production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18.
The phenotype of
Francisella-challenged
Aim2−/− provides further support that AIM2 is critical for sensing
Francisella infection and activation of the ASC-caspase-1 pathway, not only in isolated macrophages, but also in a whole animal model. Indeed this phenotype is reminiscent of the phenotype seen in
Francisella-challenged
Casp-1−/− or
Asc
−/− (
Pycard−/−) mice
9. In these mice strains as well as in
Aim2−/− mice,
Francisella infection is associated with increased lethality due to increased bacterial burden and systemic infection
9. The increased in bacterial burden in these mice is most likely due to decreased cell death of
Francisella-infected macrophage, and decreased pro-inflammatory cytokine production.
Francisella-induced macrophage cell death shares features of pyroptotic cell death induced by other pathogenic bacteria
9. However,
Francisella-induced macrophage cell death is clearly dependent on AIM2, as well as on caspase-1 and ASC
9 providing further proof that AIM2, ASC and caspase-1 function in the same signaling pathway that recognizes
Francisella infection.
In conclusion our data provides clear genetic and biochemical evidence that activation of the AIM2 inflammasome represents a crucial innate immune defense against Francisella infection. Future studies with the AIM2-deficient mice should clarify its role in the innate immune response to other intracellular microbial and viral pathogens as well as its involvement in nucleic acid-dependant autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus.