Macrophages and dendritic cells (DC) are important sentinels of the immune system detecting infectious agents by highly conserved microbial motifs, so-called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs; Janeway Jr.,
1992). Pattern recognition is mediated by a set of invariant pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) of which four families have been identified: toll-like receptors (TLRs), retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I) like receptors (RLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), and nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs; Takeuchi and Akira,
2010). NLRs comprise a large family of cytoplasmic PRRs of which only a few members have been characterized in detail. Some NLRs form multiprotein complexes called inflammasomes (Schroder and Tschopp,
2010) and activation of these complexes leads to the cleavage of the central effector molecule cysteine protease caspase-1, inducing a form of cell death known as pyroptosis which is accompanied by the release of pyrogenic IL-1ß, IL-18, and IL-33 (Davis et al.,
2011).
The flagellin sensing Nlrc4 inflammasome plays a central role in the detection of
L. pneumophila, which is the reason most inbred strains of mice are resistant to
L. pneumophila infection. The discovery of the Nlrc4 inflammasome began with the observation that macrophages derived from most mouse strains restrict bacterial replication with the notable exception of the A strain (often called A/J, although this terminology refers only to mice derived directly from the Jackson or Janvier laboratories; Yamamoto et al.,
1988). Crosses between A mice and non-permissive C57BL/6 mice showed that the susceptibility of the A strain is controlled by a single locus on mouse chromosome 13, designated Lgn1 (Beckers et al.,
1995; Dietrich et al.,
1995). Genetic studies then identified the new NLR gene,
Naip5, within this locus as responsible for the increased susceptibility of A mice to infection (Diez et al.,
2003; Wright et al.,
2003). Subsequent work showed that
Naip5-dependent restriction of
L. pneumophila relies on a functional copy of
Naip5 as well as
Nlrc4 and activation of caspase-1 (Zamboni et al.,
2006). Restriction results from the presence of bacterial flagellin in the host cytosol, and recognition of the C-terminus of flagellin is sufficient for activation of the Nlrc4 inflammasome (Molofsky et al.,
2006; Ren et al.,
2006; Lightfield et al.,
2008). Interestingly, the cytosolic localization of flagellin and/or restriction of replication depends on a functional Dot/Icm type 4 secretion system (Amer et al.,
2006; Molofsky et al.,
2006; Ren et al.,
2006; Zamboni et al.,
2006; Lamkanfi et al.,
2007). However, it is not known how the Dot/Icm system contributes to the translocation of flagellin into the host cytosol and whether the detection of flagellin by the inflammasome occurs directly or indirectly with the help of cofactors.
While formation of the inflammasome leads to the activation of caspase-1, as well as maturation and secretion of IL-1ß and IL-18, neither cytokine makes a major contribution to the restriction of
L. pneumophila in vitro or
in vivo (Amer et al.,
2006; Zamboni et al.,
2006; Coers et al.,
2007; Akhter et al.,
2009; Miao et al.,
2010). Nevertheless, caspase-1 knockout macrophages are more permissive for
L. pneumophila replication and
caspase1-deficient mice are more susceptible to
L. pneumophila infection (Amer et al.,
2006; Zamboni et al.,
2006). Caspase-1 activation upon bacterial infection may also result from an alternative Nlrc4-independent pathway which requires the apoptosis associated speck-like protein (Asc), yet Asc is dispensable for restriction (Zamboni et al.,
2006; Case et al.,
2009). Although depletion or inhibition of caspase-1 activity leads to decreased targeting of bacteria to lysosomes (Amer et al.,
2006; Zamboni et al.,
2006), the mechanism of caspase-1-dependent restriction of
L. pneumophila replication in macrophages and
in vivo is yet to be fully resolved. Activation of the Nlrc4 inflammasome can lead to macrophage cell death through caspase-1 dependent pore formation, which may account for reduced bacterial numbers through macrophage cell lysis (Case et al.,
2009; Silveira and Zamboni,
2010). Downstream molecules such as caspase-7, interferon regulatory factor (IRF) 1 and IRF8 also play a significant role in caspase-1 signaling and in the case of caspase-7, this activation leads to increased macrophage apoptosis (Akhter et al.,
2009; Fortier et al.,
2009).
caspase7-deficient mice are also more susceptible to
L. pneumophila infection (Akhter et al.,
2009). However, the ability of
L. pneumophila to replicate within macrophages
in vitro does not necessarily equate with virulence in whole animals. For example, type I interferon (IFN-I) receptor-deficient macrophages, support enhanced replication of
L. pneumophila yet IFN-I receptor-deficient mice are no more susceptible to infection
in vivo (Monroe et al.,
2009; Ang et al.,
2010).
In contrast to macrophages derived from restrictive mouse strains, human macrophages or monocytes allow robust replication of
L. pneumophila despite the presence of
Naip and
Nlrc4 orthologues. Human Nlrc4 and Naip are functional but only delay
L. pneumophila replication when overexpressed (Vinzing et al.,
2008) suggesting that the level of inflammasome activity may restrict
L. pneumophila replication in humans cells, similar to mice. A recent report also showed that human Asc is able to restrict bacterial growth in a caspase-1-dependent and independent manner but is downregulated during
L. pneumophila infection of monocytic THP-1 cells (Abdelaziz et al.,
2011). More studies in human cells, ideally in primary macrophages, will provide a useful comparison to the results derived from using mouse infection models.
Immune effector molecules produced by infected macrophages are likely to play an important role in generating a protective immune response and warrant further analysis. In mouse and human macrophages, infection with live
L. pneumophila induces the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF), interleukin (IL)-10, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-18, CXCL1 and MCP-1 as well as IFN-I (Shin et al.,
2008; Case et al.,
2009; Monroe et al.,
2009; Plumlee et al.,
2009; McCoy-Simandle et al.,
2011), whereas other cytokines such as IL-12 and IFN-γ appear to be produced at only very low levels, if at all (Matsunaga et al.,
2001,
2003). In whole animals, increased susceptibility to pulmonary
L. pneumophila results from cytokine and/or cytokine receptor deficiencies in IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF (Brieland et al.,
1998; Shinozawa et al.,
2002; Fujita et al.,
2008). This suggests that cytokine production by cell types other than macrophages is important for controlling infection. At this stage a thorough understanding of the role of distinct cytokines and immune cells in combating
L. pneumophila lung infection is lacking.