|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The Western world appears to be in the midst of the third great gout epidemic of all time. In this century, gout is increasing in prevalence despite an increased understanding of its risk factors and pathophysiology, and the availability of reasonably effective treatment. The main cultural factors responsible for this appear to be diet, obesity, ethanol use and medications. Excess fructose consumption is a newly recognized modifiable risk factor. The debate has been renewed concerning hyperuricemia as an independent risk factor for renal insufficiency and cardiovascular disease. Prevention is still rooted in lifestyle choices. Existing treatments have proven to be unsatisfactory in many patients with comorbidities. New treatments are available today and on the horizon for tomorrow, which offer a better quality of life for gout sufferers. These include febuxostat, a nonpurine inhibitor of xanthine oxidase with a potentially better combination of efficacy and safety than allopurinol, and investigational inhibitors of URAT-1, an anion exchanger in the proximal tubule that is critical for uric acid homeostasis. New abortive treatments include interleukin-1 antagonists that can cut short the acute attack in 1 to 2 days in persons who cannot take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine or corticosteroids. Lastly, newer formulations of uricase have the ability to dissolve destructive tophi over weeks or months in patients who cannot use currently available hypouricemic agents. Diagnostically, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging offer advanced ways to diagnose gout noninvasively, and just as importantly, a way to follow the progress of tophus dissolution. The close association of hyperuricemia with metabolic syndrome, hypertension and renal insufficiency ensures that nephrologists will see increasing numbers of gout-afflicted patients.
“Be temperate in wine, in eating, girls, and cloth, or the Gout will seize you and plague you …”Benjamin Franklin 1706–1790
Studies on the prevalence of gout suggest that we are in the midst of the third great gout epidemic of the Western world.1,2 Some of the reasons for this are of particular concern to nephrologists who so commonly must treat gout in persons with renal disease. Reasons for the increase in the prevalence of gout in the past 50 years include first and foremost an increase in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, which in turn reflects the increase in the average weight of the Western population. Whereas during the golden age of both the Roman and British empires gout was associated with drinking and to a lesser extent lead poisoning,3–5 in the present age gout is largely associated with obesity.6–9 Other factors are iatrogenic, such as an increase in the use of low-dose aspirin (but not high-dose aspirin),10 diuretics (very useful medicines in their own right)9 and other medications such as cyclosporine, and an increase in the number of organ transplants.
The purposes of this review are several-fold: 1) We will review the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved hypouricemic agent in 40 years, one that seems to be particularly useful in patients with renal insufficiency. 2) We will review the current data on uricase, a potential treatment for gout that (as the time of writing) has been resubmitted to the FDA for possible approval, and is a treatment that could be particularly useful for those with renal insufficiency. 3) We will review advances in the understanding of both crystal-induced inflammation and renal handling of uric acid. 4) We will review recent additions to the body of knowledge that suggests that hyperuricemia itself contributes independently to the development of hypertension, renal insufficiency and cardiovascular disease. 5) We will review evidence that the two currently available interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitors are effective for treatment/prophylaxis of gout attacks. 6) We will review musculoskeletal ultrasound as a useful imaging technique for both the diagnosis of gout and to follow the effects of hypouricemic therapy. 7) We will review evidence suggesting that fructose overconsumption contributes disproportionately to the development of hyperuricemia.
Several factors make the treatment of gout worth reviewing for nephrologists. As mentioned, the prevalence is increasing. Secondly, for the first time in 40 years a new, oral hypouricemic agent (febuxostat; Uloric®, Takeda Pharmaceuticals) has been approved in the United States (US), and it seems to be particularly useful in those with renal insufficiency, although data are still limited in this population.11 Thirdly, the goal of safely and effectively administering uricase to humans may finally be within reach.12,13 Fourthly, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (never popular among nephrologists, yet a mainstay of treatment for gout among other physicians) are now even less popular because of their recently discovered cardiovascular risks.14 Fifthly, the debate as to whether asymptomatic hyperuricemia contributes directly to kidney disease and to cardiovascular risk is again coming to the forefront.15,16 Lastly, misconceptions about the treatment of gout unfortunately still abound even among physicians.17 Long-term management of gout with lifestyle changes and 3 different classes of medications (those for treatment of the acute attack, those for prophylaxis of attacks and those that reduce body burden of uric acid) can be something of an art. Diagnostically, ultrasound has emerged as a useful tool both to diagnose gout and to follow the effects of hypouricemic treatment.18,19
The marked increase in the prevalence of gout in recent years has sparked a number of studies on the quality of life of gouty patients. How do we do at treating gout?
Several studies have documented a lower quality of life among gouty patients. A recent study of gouty patients found that the PCS (Physical Component Summary of the SF-36) was approximately 10 points lower than for the general population. This is twice the threshold of what is considered clinically meaningful. One conclusion of the study was that the current treatment of gout appears to be suboptimal in that nearly half of the patients in the study were experiencing three or more gout flares per year, despite >80% of the patients chronically receiving allopurinol. It was hypothesized that physicians may not view the impact of gout nearly as severely as do patients.20 It is not entirely clear that this is due to gout alone. Gouty patients have on average a larger number of comorbidities. This was documented recently among veterans21,22 but in other studies lower quality persists after adjustment for comorbidities.23
A recent review of 2 systematic reviews performed by the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group highlighted the lack of randomized controlled trials regarding treatment options for acute gout. One conclusion was that colchicine provided a lower quality of life because it almost always causes diarrhea at effective doses, and has a slower onset of action at doses that avoid gastrointestinal distress.24
As pointed out by Kim and Choi, recent studies suggest that the majority of gouty patients are not adequately managed with currently available gout treatments.25 Shulten found that physicians do not recommend adequate dietary changes to many persons with gout.26
It has been further pointed out that serum uric acid is the usual endpoint used in gout treatment trials,25 whereas the FDA is now recommending use of patient-reported outcome instruments as effectiveness endpoints in clinical trials. Patients are more interested in the number and severity of gout attacks rather than keeping their uric acid level low. This helps to explain the often poor patient compliance with hypouricemic therapy. It is worth noting in this regard that (despite our efforts at education) patients often perceive hypouricemic therapy as causing more gout instead of less, adding to noncompliance.
In summary, there continue to be abundant opportunities to improve the outcomes of this disease.
The prevalence of gout increases approximately four-fold to 4.1% by the age of 75 years.27 The risk of developing gout is closely related to the serum uric acid (sUA) level,28 yet most persons with hyperuricemia never develop clinically evident gout. In one large study, the 5-year risk of gout varied from 0.6% for those with a serum uric acid level < 7 mg/dL to 30.5% for those with a level ≥10 mg/dL. The prevalence of hyperuricemia varies with factors such as age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure and renal function. Women are relatively protected until menopause, at which time the incidence of gout increases, a phenomenon that is attributed to loss of estrogen effect (with resulting increase in serum uric acid level), but the exact pathophysiology is unclear.29,30
Gout is closely associated with metabolic syndrome consisting of insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia.1 The magnitude of this association bears emphasis. In one cohort study, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 43.6% in those with gout versus 5.2% in the general population.31 Both hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome are associated with abdominal girth as an independent risk factor.32 Hypertriglyceridemia (but not isolated hypercholesterolemia) has been reported in 75% to 80% of gouty patients,33 and is only partially explained by obesity and ethanol consumption. Hypertension may also be a risk factor for hyperuricemia. Hyperuricemia occurs in 22% to 38% of hypertensive patients before treatment and the prevalence is further increased by diuretic use.
While type 2 diabetes is a known risk factor for metabolic syndrome and for gout, it appears that those with a higher degree of insulin resistance are more at risk.34 Some of the recognized risk factors for hyperuricemia are given in Tables 1 and and22.
One of the most recent and fascinating developments in the understanding of risk factors for gout is the hypothesis that there is a strong correlation between consumption of fructose and development of both metabolic syndrome and hyperuricemia.50,54 Rats fed a high-fructose diet develop hyperuricemia, hypertension and afferent arteriopathy that are ameliorated (including improvement in histomorphology) by allopurinol, febuxostat or benzbromarone, and there is accumulating evidence in humans.55,56 On the other hand, the view that current levels of fructose intake are reasonably safe is eloquently argued by White.57,58
The safety of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was never seriously questioned until recently because the composition is very similar to that of sucrose, except for the presence of the disaccharide bond in sucrose.58 HFCS contains sugars mainly in the form of monosaccharides. The most commonly used high fructose products are HFCS-42 and HFCS-55, which contain 42% and 55% fructose, respectively, with the balance of the carbohydrates consisting mainly of glucose. Sucrose is a disaccharide consisting of equal parts (50% each) of fructose and glucose. The term “high fructose corn syrup” is used to distinguish it from simple corn syrup which contains carbohydrate almost exclusively in the form of glucose.
How would excessive fructose intake cause hypertension? As intriguingly detailed by Soleimani,59 increased dietary fructose stimulates both salt and fructose absorption from the small intestine, but also reabsorption of sodium in the kidney proximal tubule. This is thought to be due to the presence of the same fructose-stimulated transporter mechanisms in both locations. In animal experiments, fructose-induced hypertension could be abrogated by feeding a low-salt diet. Soleimani argues that increased dietary fructose and salt are additive in their effects, and optimal blood pressure control for the hypertensive population would require reduction of both nutrients.
Does fructose cause hyperuricemia in humans as it does in animals? Prospective data are difficult to find. Akhavan and colleagues administered 300 kcal sugar loads to normal subjects. The sugar loads consisted of different ratios of glucose to fructose (G/F). Sucrose was also used. A sugar load consisting of 20% glucose and 80% fructose is designated as G20/F80. Uric acid levels began to rise within 15 minutes after the sugar loads. By 45 minutes, uric acid level rose by ~61 μmol/L (~1.02 mg/dL) in the G20/F80 group, but only approximately half that in the sucrose group and in the G50/F50 group, although the difference was not statistically significant, perhaps because of the small sample size (n = 7). Baseline mean uric acid level in this study was 295.9 μmol/L (~5.0 mg/dL).60 Nevertheless, definitive prospective data indicating that long-term fructose overconsumption contributes to long-term hyperuricemia in human populations are still lacking.
Is renal insufficiency of any cause a risk factor for gout? This has been a controversial question. Because of the complex handling of uric acid by the kidney (see Pathophysiology below), it seems to depend on the cause of the renal insufficiency. The incidence of kidney stones is markedly reduced in many cases of renal insufficiency.61 Diseases that are primarily glomerular do not seem to increase the incidence of gout until glomerular filtration rate (GFR) falls to ~15 mL/min because of a compensatory increase in tubular secretion resulting in a markedly increased fractional excretion of uric acid.61,62 Tubular diseases, on the other hand, can either increase or decrease the incidence of gout depending on which part of the tubule is affected. Other factors that may contribute to the relatively low rate of hyperuricemia and gout in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) include lower protein intake and increased intestinal clearance of uric acid. As with gouty patients with normal renal function, most patients with CKD and gout are “underexcretors” of uric acid for their level of serum creatinine.62 The question as to whether CKD is a risk factor for hyperuricemia was recently reviewed by Feig who looked at 11 studies published in the past several years. He noted that 7 studies supported such an association while 4 did not.63
In addition to epidemiologic studies that have consistently indicated that hyperuricemia itself is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease rather than an innocent bystander, additional lines of experimental evidence now support this notion. There is evidence that uric acid itself may contribute to vascular endothelial dysfunction and plays a “pro-oxidant” role. While the exact mechanisms are not known, experimental hyperuricemia in rats produced hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, interstitial disease and vascular smooth muscle proliferation.64–67
In 1982, Gibson and colleagues demonstrated that allopurinol treatment of a group of gouty patients with CKD resulted in preservation of GFR, in contrast to a control group.68 Avram and Krishnan recently reviewed clinical studies of hyperuricemia and CKD, and concluded that most studies show hyperuricemia to be an independent risk factor for the future development of CKD.69 Siu and colleagues published a small controlled trial that showed a trend toward preservation of GFR using allopurinol in hyperuricemic patients with mild to moderate CKD.56 A recently presented abstract found that long-term febuxostat improved or preserved GFR in gouty patients.70
There have been several critical reviews of the evidence linking hyperuricemia in a causative role with cardiovascular disease, with the conclusion being that the association seems reasonably strong, but is not yet definitive.71,72
Does hyperuricemia directly cause hypertension? Perhaps the most compelling evidence comes from animal studies in which induced hyperuricemia causes hypertension that is reversible with hypouricemic agents including febuxostat, allopurinol and benzbromarone.73 In one such study, experimental hyperuricemia using oxonic acid (an inhibitor of uricase) also caused glomerular hypertrophy, afferent arteriolar sclerosis and macrophage infiltration.74
Prospective data in humans that definitively establish causality between hyperuricemia and hypertension are lacking. Nevertheless, a number of such studies suggest a causal relationship without another likely explanation.75–78 One large epidemiologic study using a subset of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) database followed for 6 years men who had hyperuricemia (serum uric acid >7.0 mg/dL) but without either hypertension or metabolic syndrome. The presence of hyperuricemia alone increased the risk of developing hypertension by 80% after control for other known risk factors.79 Epidemiological studies in children and adolescents have strongly associated hyperuricemia with the later development of hypertension, but perhaps most interesting is a prospective study that used allopurinol in adolescents to successfully treat hypertension.80 Results have been inconsistent in adults. It has therefore been hypothesized that the pathophysiology of essential hypertension is still reversible in adolescents but becomes fixed by adulthood.
If hyperuricemia causes hypertension and cardiovascular disease, what is the mechanism? There may be several. The role of fructose has recently been highlighted as discussed above. Vascular reactivity (itself a part of the metabolic syndrome) has also been reported as a direct effect of hyperuricemia. For instance, using isolated rat aorta rings, Nakagawa and colleagues demonstrated a striking relationship between uric acid level and impaired vasorelaxation in response to acetylcholine perfusion.50 This effect was apparent even at physiologic concentrations of uric acid for the rat (~1.5 mg/dL). Data are less direct in humans. One study found serum uric acid to be an independent risk factor for forearm blood flow in patients on stable peritoneal dialysis.81
Gout has long been associated with congestive heart failure, with the presumed association simply being hyperuricemia due to diuretic use, but recent research suggests that uric acid level in itself is associated with diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular hypertrophy (independent of any effect on blood pressure), and is an independent risk factor for congestive heart failure.82,83
Pre-eclampsia is associated with hyperuricemia, higher serum levels being associated with worse intrauterine growth retardation. Recent research suggests that elevated uric acid plays a role in impaired amino acid transport through the placenta, and may thus play a causative role.84
There have been a number of advances in the understanding of the renal handling of uric acid in recent years.85 First, it is important to realize that the upper limit of normal for serum uric acid (approximately 8.0 mg/dL for men in most labs) is not at all related to the solubility of uric acid in serum, but is derived purely from population-based studies of “normal” persons. The upper limit of uric acid solubility in serum at physiologic pH and temperature is approximately 6.8 mg/dL. This level is much more relevant for gout. The normal body urate pool in men ranges from about 800 to 1500 mg with a daily turnover of approximately two-thirds.86 The body pool of urate is expanded in gouty patients, both because of hyperuricemia and also because of deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) in tissues (which may be asymptomatic for many years).
Most (85% to 90%) of gouty patients are defined as “underexcretors”.87 In this group, measurements of endogenous uric acid production is normal, so it is assumed that the kidney is not excreting enough uric acid to maintain serum levels in the normal range (<6.8 mg/dL). It could also be said that the kidney excretes normal amounts of uric acid only when the serum level is elevated.
Uric acid is freely filterable at the glomerulus. Almost all of the filtered uric acid is then reabsorbed in the S1 segment of the proximal tubule. Of the reabsorbed urate, 45% to 50% is then secreted in the S1 and S2 segments of the proximal tubule. Much of the secreted urate is again reabsorbed in the S3 segment of the proximal tubule.85 Most persons who are hyperuricemic never get gout, but the risk of gout goes up dramatically with higher serum uric acid levels. In one large study, the 5-year risk of gout varied from 0.6% for those with a serum uric acid level of <7 mg/dL to 30.5% for those with a level of 10 mg/dL or higher.28
In recent years a family of organic anion transporter proteins has been discovered. Enomoto and colleagues cloned one called urate transporter 1 (URAT-1) which is highly specific for urate transport.88 URAT-1 is present in the proximal tubular epithelial cells89 and exchanges urate with other endogenous organic anions as well as drug anions. Most uricosuric drugs are thought to act by suppressing the activity of URAT-1, including probenecid, benzbromarone, sulfinpyrazone and losartan. In the case of probenecid at least, there may also be an ATP-inhibiting effect via pannexin-1.90 Aspirin may also affect uric acid excretion in part through a mechanism involving URAT-1. URAT-1 is thought to be critically important in maintaining serum uric acid levels. Individuals with nonfunctional mutations of URAT-1 have very low uric acid levels.89,91 The clinically relevant biology of URAT-1 has recently been reviewed.92
UAT-1 is another renal urate transporter that has subsequently been identified as galectin-9.93 Its role in intestinal and renal secretion of urate anion has yet to be established. A number of other urate transporters have been discovered, and seem especially important in hereditary gout.94–97
Patients with familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy (FJHN) have early onset of hyperuricemia, hypertension, progressive renal failure and variable degrees of gout. Most cases are due to a mutation in the UMOD gene which encodes uromodulin (Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein).85,98 Uromodulin is hypothesized to be important for the structural integrity of the ascending loop of Henle. Although phenotypically distinct from FJHN, some forms of medullary cystic kidney disease, type 2 and glomerulocystic kidney disease are also thought to be attributable to mutations in UMOD and have hyperuricemia associated with them.85,99
The discovery of elevated serum uric acid levels in gouty patients is normally credited to Garrod in 1859.100 It was not until 1962 that the inflammatory nature of MSU, the insoluble, crystalline salt of uric acid that typically forms tophi, was proven. In that year Faires and McCarty injected their own knees (and those of their fellows) with MSU, proving that minute quantities of crystals can cause severe inflammation.101 Yet, it is well known that between attacks in up to 70% of gouty patients, MSU crystals can be found floating free in synovial fluid without inciting inflammation.102 Clearly other factors besides the simple presence of crystals are at work to turn on/off the inflammatory cascade.
The predilection of gout for the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) has been hypothesized to represent the result of a number of factors.103 It is hypothesized that a small joint effusion forms during daytime activities, particularly activities that are more strenuous or traumatic to the joint (the first MTP is a frequent site of minor trauma and hence, osteoarthritis). At night (when most gout attacks occur) tissue edema fluid (more abundant more distally in the lower extremity) is gradually reabsorbed into the circulation. The concentration of urate rises in the joint because urate is reabsorbed more slowly than water. The lower temperature of the distal foot is thought to also contribute to precipitation of MSU crystals. The net result is the classic but unwelcome nocturnal visitor that so rudely awakens the victim from a sound sleep.
For a gout attack to occur, there must be deposition of MSU in the tissues and there must also be the triggering of inflammation. Crystals alone are not enough, as evidenced by the fact that tophi only occasionally become inflamed, and also that MSU crystals can often be found floating freely in synovial fluid from uninflamed joints. A number of factors have been discovered in recent years that control the inflammatory process, and there are several eloquent reviews.1,85,104–108
Liberation of free crystals is one factor that can trigger the acute gout attack. Free crystals can be newly deposited, or may form through dissolution of tophi (as when instituting treatment with a hypouricemic agent) or may be dislodged from otherwise stable deposits by trauma.109 It is estimated that only approximately 20% of persons with sustained hyperuricemia actually develop gout.28 A rapid decline in serum uric acid level can precipitate an attack. This often occurs at the start of hypouricemic therapy or more characteristically when an alcoholic suddenly ceases to imbibe ethanol for any reason.
Although not as novel as the developments reported in the following, protein-coating of crystals has been shown in the past to affect inflammation. Coating with IgG, complement fragments or fibronectin are pro-inflammatory in this regard, while coating with lipoproteins B and E reduces the inflammatory reaction to the crystals.108,110,111
Much remains to be learned about the process of crystal-induced inflammation, but there have been some advances in recent years, and there are several recent reviews.108,112 Crystals of MSU or calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) trigger intense neutrophilic influx into joints in just 1 to 2 hours.101,113 In addition to neutrophils, other cell types are also capable of phagocytizing crystals including monocytes and endothelial cells.114–116 Recent studies by Martin and colleagues suggest that resident macrophages (rather than recruited neutrophils and monocytes) actually initiate and drive the inflammatory response,117,118 while eventual differentiation of monocytes into macrophages results in resolution of crystal-induced inflammation.
Research over the past 20 years has demonstrated central roles for the cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and IL-8.118 IL-1 seems to be particularly important since IL-1 inhibitors can abort crystal-induced inflammation both in vitro and in the clinic.
As reviewed by Liu-Bryan and Rose,108 neutrophils move into joints by the actions of IL-1 and TNF-α.104,119 This stimulates upregulation of E-selectin and chemotactic factors CXCL8 and CXCR2. Phagocytosis of crystals by neutrophils then causes release of cytoplasmic mediators such as calgranulins.120
MSU crystals can activate several inflammatory pathways directly. MSU crystals are rapidly phagocytized by neutrophils in vitro and in vivo. They stimulate monocytes to express large quantities of IL-1β (via formation of the NALP-3 inflammasome complexes).104,121,122 Uric acid has been included among the “endogenous alarmins”.123
One of the primary mediators of urate-induced inflammation is IL-1β.124,125 Interestingly, IL-1β production by mononuclear cells is triggered by MSU but not by CPPD or hydroxyapatite,124,126 suggesting that crystal-induced inflammation can be triggered by other pathways as well. Nevertheless, the formation of IL-1 is a clinically important process that can be blocked by IL-1 inhibitors to great therapeutic advantage.
The term “inflammasome” first appeared in the medical literature in 2002.127 Martinon and colleagues described it as a caspase-activating complex that includes caspase-1, caspase-5, Pycard/Asc, and NALP1, a pyrin domain-containing protein sharing structural homology with NODs (NALP = NACHT domain, leucine-rich repeat domain, and pyrin domain).
Inflammasomes are large intracellular assemblies of several types of proteins that trigger or facilitate the inflammatory process.122,128,129 Inflammasomes are an important intracellular mediator in the production of IL-1β and IL-18 and may also induce cellular pyroptosis, a type of programmed cell death distinct from apoptosis.130 IL-1β is activated by intracellular cleavage of Pro-IL-1 by caspase-1. Caspase-1 in turn is thought to be activated by the NALP-3 inflammasome. Mutations in the NALP-3 inflammasome may lead to IL-1β overproduction, as in familial Mediterranean fever. There have been several thorough reviews on the role of inflammasomes in gout and in other auto-inflammatory conditions, particularly the cryopyrinopathies such as familial cold-induced urticaria, Muckle–Wells syndrome and CINCA syndrome (chronic infantile neurologic, cutaneous, articular syndrome).122,131–134
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are membrane-bound extracellular receptors that constitute an important part of the innate immune system. Their primary function is to recognize microbial invaders.122 NOD-like receptors are intracellular complexes that sense microbial and nonmicrobial danger signals (such as crystals) and then form inflammasomes.
There is some understanding of how IL-1 production is triggered. The innate immune system in the form of TLRs appears to be involved,119,135–137 especially TLR-2 and TLR-4 which have been shown to be activated by MSU crystals.104,135 Using a mouse model and protein-free, endotoxin-free MSU crystals, it was found that deficiency of TLR-2 and/or TLR-4 resulted in blunted production IL-1β, TNF-α and other cytokines.119 While TLRs appear to have a role in the amplification of the inflammatory response, there is also some evidence from murine models that they are not actually required.118
CD14 is a pattern recognition receptor on the surface of phagocytic cells that seems to be important for crystal-induced IL-1 production. Scott and colleagues found that MSU crystals but not latex beads, diamond crystals or aluminum triggered CD14 activation. CD14 deficient cells were still able to phagocytize crystals but expressed approximately 90% less IL-1.137 There is some evidence from murine models that TLRs do not bind MSU directly, but rather that CD14 binds to the crystals, making the crystals recognizable by TLRs.118,137
Gout attacks eventually resolve, even without specific treatment. If little is known about how crystals initiate inflammation, less is known about the mechanisms leading to spontaneous resolution of gout. As monocytes differentiate into macrophages they appear to lose the ability to secrete inflammatory cytokines in response to MSU crystals. Yagnik and colleagues recently showed that such differentiated macrophages also secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines, particularly TGF-β1.138 Other anti-inflammatory mediators such as IL-10, PGD2 and 15deoxy-PGJ2 (ligand of PPARγ) are also secreted mainly by macrophages.108,138,139
Resolution of gout follows the normal 3-phase pattern found in the body, including removal and/or neutralization of crystals, clearance of apoptotic cells and debris, and a switch of cytokine patterns from the pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory.108 Superoxide seems to help break down MSU crystals but not CPPD crystals.140
Although it is often said that crystals (mostly extracellular but occasionally intracellular as well) may be found in joints between attacks, it is important to realize that low-level inflammation persists along with the potential for ongoing joint damage.141
Nearly every physician is familiar with the acute, nocturnal, monoarticular presentation of gout in the first MTP joint that awakens the sufferer from sound sleep. Some notes on the less common clinical features of gout may be helpful. There are 4 stages in the development of clinical gout:142 asymptomatic hyperuricemia, the gouty attack (usually monoarticular, at least at first), the intercritical period and chronic gouty arthritis. In most persons, hyperuricemia exists for many years before the first clinical attack of gout. While the first clinical attack is usually monoarticular, it could also be polyarticular. The first MTP joint is the first joint attacked in roughly 50% of individuals. Some persons never have clinical attacks of gout, but rather they slowly build tophaceous deposits in and around joints. One characteristic presentation is acute inflammation of 1 or more finger joints, particularly Heberden’s nodes in elderly females with osteoarthritis who are using diuretics.143,144
Attacks before the age of 25 to 30 years in men (or at any time any premenopausal woman) should raise the suspicion of an inborn enzyme defect or one of several hereditary kidney diseases. The latter include familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy, autosomal dominant medullary cystic kidney disease and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.46
Pain is the last symptom to appear and the first to disappear. A corollary of this is that relatively painless swelling of a joint or a digit may persist for weeks. This often gives rise to a fear of osteomyelitis, occasionally resulting in unnecessary surgery to debride an “infected” digit. Gout is a common cause of dactylitis in adults. Other common causes include psoriatic arthritis, sarcoidosis, osteomyelitis and, in children, sickle-cell disease. The affected digit may even take on a dusky, reddish purple hue as the inflammation becomes chronic. If the attack persists untreated, and if inflammation has been severe, desquamation tends to occur. Dactylitis can take 1 or 2 months to resolve.142
Unfortunately, attacks tend to become more frequent and more severe with time with a tendency to involve more joints.
The intercritical period begins after resolution of the first gout attack. During this stage, joints appear to return to normal. During this stage, ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may still show tophaceous deposits around affected joints. Untreated, such deposits tend to worsen with time.
The stage of chronic tophaceous gout occurs when monosodium urate builds up around tissues so as to be clinically obvious between attacks. The word “tophus” is derived from the Greek word for chalk. Tophi may be quite firm and may be confused with tumors. Tophi mimic rheumatoid nodules, particularly in men where they tend to occur along the olecranon aspect of the forearm. Tophi can form over an interval of only a few days in persons with severe hyperuricemia, such as occurs with critical illness hyperuricemia.142,145 Occasionally, spontaneous rupture occurs. The white, pasty material that exudes is almost pure MSU, sometimes with ultramicroscopic calcium crystals, but only rarely white cells. Untreated, draining tophi can take months or years to close. Detailed descriptions of the osseous and the dermatologic manifestations of gout have been published.142
Tophaceous material is a white pasty substance that is easily identified microscopically as sheets of needle-shaped crystals. MSU crystals are somewhat soluble in water and formaldehyde. Pure alcohol fixation is necessary to preserve the crystals in tissue samples.146,147
Definitive diagnosis of gout (including differentiation from pseudogout and the ever-lurking specter of septic arthritis) has traditionally required arthrocentesis. Until recently, imaging has not been particularly helpful. The subject of imaging has been recently reviewed.148,149
Traditional radiographs are largely unhelpful in the diagnosis of gout since the crystals are relatively radiolucent, and bony changes do not occur until late in the course of the disease. Radiographs are helpful to look for chondrocalcinosis which would lead to a diagnosis of pseudogout instead. Late destructive changes of gout that may be apparent on radiographs include overhanging edges, erosions and cysts within bone. The presence of overhanging edges helps distinguish gout from rheumatoid arthritis. Also helpful is the tendency of bony erosions and cysts in gout to have sclerotic margins, and there is usually absence of joint space narrowing and there is lack of periarticular demineralization.
Imaging of gout in the US took a leap forward in the past 10 years with the popularization of musculoskeletal ultrasound, which has been used for many years in Europe.150 Ultrasound offers the ability to diagnose gout between attacks (when there is little or no aspiratable fluid in joints) or in patients who may have asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Ultrasound may also allow diagnosis of palpable tophaceous deposits without needle aspiration, and may allow differentiation between gout and pseudogout based on the location and characteristics of the crystal deposits.151 Gouty joints often show the characteristic “double contour sign” on ultrasonographic imaging.152 We find ultrasound to be particularly helpful in the long-term management of gout by following the dissolution of tophaceous deposits over time and using this information to adjust the intensity of hypouricemic treatment.
The main drawback of ultrasound is the need for somewhat extensive training and practice. It is also not yet universally available in the US. Most radiologists and rheumatologists in the US do not receive significant training in the musculoskeletal application of ultrasound.
Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography have also been used to diagnose gout, particularly tophaceous deposits. MRI is particularly helpful in detecting bony changes that are not visible on plain radiographs.153,154 One caveat is that the magnetic resonance appearance may mimic osteomyelitis particularly during the acute attack when there may be intraosseous edema and also soft tissue inflammation. We have seen 2 patients operated for lumbar osteomyelitis who in reality had acute gout of the facet joints that improved rapidly with corticosteroid treatment.
The treatment of gout is traditionally divided into 3 phases: 1) treatment of the acute attack; 2) prevention of future attacks; and 3) hypouricemic therapy. We will consider each separately.
Inappropriate treatment of acute gout seems to persist. One recent study found that of 159 patients who consulted a physician for their gout, 10 received definitely inappropriate treatment and 43 received potentially inappropriate treatment for their recurrent attacks. Inappropriate treatment was defined as use of a hypouricemic agent to treat an acute attack, without having used it prophylactically previously.155
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the drugs of choice for the average patient with gout without comorbidities. They are usually not an option in persons with chronic renal disease as they can worsen renal function temporarily or permanently, cause fluid retention and increase blood pressure, occasionally dramatically. This holds true to both traditional NSAIDS such as indomethacin as well as COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib, although the latter seems to be much more benign in this regard than the related drug rofecoxib, which was withdrawn from the market in the US.
Colchicine is perceived as safer than NSAIDs in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency, as long as the maintenance dose is adjusted. Colchicine is an alkaloid derived from Colchicum autumnale, the autumn crocus, a species that is more properly placed in the lily family. Plant extracts containing colchicine have been used to treat gout for more than 2000 years. The oral form of colchicine has been available for gout treatment for 70 years. However there has been no FDA-approved preparation until recently and the branded product is being marketed under the name of Colcrys®; URL Pharma, Inc.).
The Colcrys® trial showed that a low-dose regimen of colchicine (1.8 mg total over 1 hour) and a high-dose regimen (4.8 mg total over 6 hours) were equivalent in aborting the acute gout attack at 24 hours, with many fewer adverse events in the low-dose group. Additionally, formal recommendations for using colchicine in patients with renal insufficiency and hepatic insufficiency were made, and the many drug interactions of colchicine were formalized.156
Colchicine is a drug with both a narrow therapeutic-toxicity window and a marked variability between individuals in drug disposition. Often, the cumulative dose that relieves the gout attack is close to the dose that causes diarrhea, abdominal cramping and nausea. Dose reduction is commonly recommended in patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 50 mL/min. Because the Colcrys® regimen is itself low-dose, dosage adjustment is not necessary in the presence of mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency, according to the official prescribing information.157 In severe renal insufficiency, the dosing for acute flares is unchanged (1.8 mg/24 hours) but it should not be repeated more frequently than every 2 weeks. The prophylactic dose should be reduced to 0.3 mg/day. In patients receiving dialysis, the dose for gout flares is reduced to 0.6 mg × 1 dose only, to be repeated in not less than 2 weeks. The prophylactic dose is reduced to 0.3 mg twice a week “with close monitoring”.157 Colchicine is not removed by dialysis or exchange transfusion.158 The manufacturer does state that Colcrys® is contraindicated in patients with severe renal impairment who are also receiving drugs that inhibit permeability glycoprotein (P-glycoprotein, P-gp; also known as ABCB1) or that inhibit CYP3A4. P-gp is an important transporter protein in the elimination of colchicine.
Colchicine undergoes metabolism by the liver primarily through deacetylation. Approximately 20% of the parent drug is excreted unchanged in the urine; in the face of hepatic dysfunction, this percentage increases.
Serious colchicine toxicity includes severe diarrhea leading to dehydration and metabolic acidosis, bone marrow failure, polyneuropathy, chronic myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Risk factors for toxicity include older age, concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors (such as cimetidine, erythromycin, clarithromycin, diltiazem, verapamil, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors), inhibitors of P-gp (such as cyclosporine), and most consistently, renal impairment.
Cyclosporine potentiates colchicine neuromyopathy as does renal insufficiency which itself may be induced by cyclosporine, compounding the problem. Neuromyopathy may occur within weeks of starting the combination. Notably, cyclosporine delayed colchicine-induced diarrhea in an animal model system, likely due to modulation of intestinal P-gp.159 Hence, it is suspected that cyclosporine could mask the gastrointestinal side effects of colchicine that customarily signal the onset of acute toxicity. Myopathy and neuropathy are often reversible upon discontinuation of the medication within 2 to 12 weeks.160,161
In 2008 the FDA withdrew marketing approval for all existing intravenous preparations of colchicine secondary to inappropriate use and high mortality associated with its use.
Intra-articular corticosteroids are particularly helpful in acute gout. Injected joints are usually markedly improved in 24 hours. In our experience, intra-articular corticosteroids provide the fastest resolution of the acute gouty flare. Intra-articular steroids are also very safe in patients with renal insufficiency and should perhaps be a treatment of first choice unless there is polyarticular gout. When properly performed, arthrocentesis should not be particularly uncomfortable, even with an inflamed joint. Lack of operator experience is probably the main impediment to more widespread use of intra-articular corticosteroids.
Intra-articular corticosteroids may not be feasible when many joints are affected. Systemic corticosteroids are a better option in such cases. Prednisone in a dose of 30 mg twice daily is effective in most cases. Because of the short half-life of prednisone, once daily dosing is often ineffective. Oral corticosteroids are well absorbed and are generally as effective as intravenous steroids. Corticosteroids are tapered over 7 to 10 days. It is important to begin a prophylactic agent such as colchicine when tapering corticosteroids to avoid a rebound flare of gout activity.
There is some anecdotal evidence for the effectiveness of TNF-α blocking agents for the management of severe gout.162,163 Conceptually this makes some sense, since crystals are a potent stimulus for TNF-α production by mononuclear cells.164,165 Controlled trials in gouty subjects are lacking to date.
In one report the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra (Kineret®; Biovitrum AB) was reported to be rapidly effective in suppressing flares in 10 patients with difficult-to-treat acute gout.166 Anecdotally, inhibition of IL-1 may be a more effective strategy for treating acute gout than inhibition of TNF-α.167,168 There are some patients with severe gouty flares who cannot or should not receive NSAIDs, colchicine or high-dose corticosteroids, or who are refractory to such treatments. In such cases, anakinra is sometimes an alternative although it is not FDA-approved for treatment of gout. While expensive if used chronically for rheumatoid arthritis (for which the drug is approved), at a cost of US$75 per day it is actually quite cost-effective when given for 3 to 5 days to hospitalized patients who otherwise might require high-dose intravenous corticosteroids with treatment of resulting steroid complications.
Rilonacept (Arcalyst®; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) is a dimeric fusion protein that acts as an IL-1 inhibitor that is FDA-approved for treatment of cryopyrin-associated periodic fever syndromes. Its effectiveness in chronic tophaceous gout was assessed in a pilot study. While it did not reduce the number of affected joints, it did decrease the severity of symptoms in affected joints. It also decreased C-reactive protein (CRP) levels initially but CRP trended upward as treatment continued beyond 6 weeks.169
Canakinumab is an investigational fully humanized monoclonal antibody directed against IL-1β. In a Phase II study involving 191 subjects with acute, difficult-to-treat gout, single doses of canakinumab were more effective beginning at 24 hours than triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg intramuscularly. It also effectively prevented recurrences for up to 8 weeks.170 Canakinumab (Ilaris®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals) is currently FDA-approved and available on the US market for treatment of cryopyrin-associated periodic fever syndromes including familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome and Muckle–Wells syndrome.
Biological treatment/prophylaxis of gout attacks is still in its infancy. There are many questions to be addressed before biological treatment can be generally recommended. Among the issues to be resolved are the very high cost, as yet unproven efficacy and unclear safety profile compared with traditional agents.
Tranilast is an interesting investigational compound (it is on the market in parts of Asia) with anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic and uricosuric effects. It is currently in trials for gout, hyperuricemia and other conditions. It has the potential to act as both a suppressor of acute attacks and possibly a hypouricemic therapy as well.171
Apremilast is a novel phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE 4) inhibitor with potent anti-inflammatory properties which is currently being studied as a treatment for acute gout attacks.172,173 As with tranilast, it has the potential to prevent acute flares in those who may not be able to use NSAIDs.
Once the acute attack has subsided, the next goal is prevention of future attacks.142 This is particularly important in the first few weeks after an acute attack. Generally, either an NSAID or colchicine is used for this purpose. NSAIDs are the treatment of choice in persons with concomitant osteoarthritis. For prophylaxis, lower doses usually suffice, such as celecoxib 200 mg daily or naproxen 375 mg/day. Indomethacin is not recommended for this use, particularly in persons who are taking triamterene, in whom it can cause acute renal failure.174,175 Colchicine prophylaxis is used in persons who cannot or should not take NSAIDs. As described above, the dose of colchicine must be reduced in the presence of renal or hepatic insufficiency. Chronic colchicine toxicity takes the form not of diarrhea, but rather of myoneuropathy which combines symptoms of peripheral neuropathy with muscle weakness and usually mildly elevated creatine kinase.161,176–178 Unfortunately, a few individuals cannot take even 0.3 mg/day of colchicine without severe diarrhea. This appears to be idiosyncratic. Prophylaxis remains a major problem in these individuals. Rarely, we have used low-dose daily corticosteroid treatment as a preventive when there has been no other choice, but our impression is that tachyphylaxis develops fairly rapidly to the preventive effect and dosage escalation is required, with all of the attendant side effects and risks that accompany chronic corticosteroid use. IL-1 inhibitors offer an effective if expensive alternative. As noted above, 2 such agents are currently available on the US market but are not FDA-approved for use in gout.
The duration of prophylaxis varies. In a person without obvious tophaceous deposits who has only occasional attacks, prophylaxis may be necessary for only 2 or 3 weeks. Prophylaxis is generally used for several months in those who are also beginning a hypouricemic agent, because more frequent attacks may accompany sudden lowering of uric acid levels.142,179 Generally, the more potent the hypouricemic effect, the more frequent and the more severe are the gout flares during the initial months of hypouricemic treatment. In persons with tophi, prophylaxis should be continued until all tophaceous deposits have been dissolved. Perhaps the best way to follow the need for gout attack prophylaxis is with the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound to determine when all tophaceous material has been dissolved away.151–154,180,181
Moderation of alcohol consumption, diets tailored to control portion sizes, maintenance of ideal body weight and reducing insulin resistance34 are lifestyle changes that are recommended in contrast to use of an unpalatable low purine diet. Specific foods that seem to decrease uric acid levels include dairy products, coffee and vitamin C. Increased levels are associated with red meat, fructose (sweetened beverages) and beer. Unfortunately, the maximum serum urate reduction achieved by diet alone is typically only ~1 mg/dL or up to 15% (unless accompanied by significant weight reduction), which makes pharmacologic options necessary for most patients with gout. The role of diet has recently been reviewed.182,183
Over the past 20 years, the average weight of American men has increased from 168 pounds (76 kg) to approximately 180 pounds (82 kg), and women from 142 pounds (64 kg) to 152 pounds (69 kg).184 According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), about two-thirds of Americans are overweight (BMI ≥ 25) and nearly one-third are obese (BMI ≥ 30).185 The proportion of obese persons increased from 13.3% to 32.1% since 1960. In addition to gout, overweight and obesity are associated with type II diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension, stroke, hyperlipidemia, gallbladder disease, degenerative joint disease, sleep apnea and several types of cancer (including breast, colorectal, endometrial and kidney). Choi and colleagues found that the relative risk of gout was 1.95 for men with a BMI of 25 to 29.3 and 2.33 for men whose BMI was 30 to 34.9 and 2.97 for a BMI of ≥35, compared with men whose BMI was 21 to 22.9.186 In summary, the major contribution of food to gout, at least in the current world epidemic, appears to be simply too much.
Perhaps surprisingly, there is a strong correlation between intake of sugar-containing soft drinks and serum uric acid levels. After adjusting for other variables such as body weight, Choi and colleagues found that those consuming four or more servings per day had uric acid levels on average 0.42 mg/dL higher than those with no intake of sweetened soft drinks, and the risk of hyperuricemia was increased 1.8-fold.187 In another study looking at males alone, the association was even stronger.188 Unfortunately there was also an association with consumption of fructose-containing fruits such as apples and oranges. (One could be forgiven for thinking that consumption of an apple a day is somehow healthier than drinking a pint of fruit juice.) Interestingly, consumption of cherries and vegetable protein has been associated with decreased risk.189 Schlesinger notes that an acute purine load can raise serum uric acid level by 1 to 2 mg/dL within 24 hours, sufficient to account for gout attacks occurring after dietary indiscretions on holidays.189
Patients often ask what they can do to improve their gout, although enthusiasm is often dampened by the recommendation to lose weight and to reduce alcohol consumption. Furthermore, although weight loss ultimately helps, fasting or near fasting can actually provoke gout attacks, presumably due to ketosis.190
When it comes to gout (in contrast to the situation with driving under the influence) all alcohol may not be equivalent. Beer (which has high purine content) seems to raise uric acid levels more per ounce of alcohol ingested and seems to be associated with a higher risk of gout than distilled spirits.191 Modest intake of wine (1 or 2 glasses per day) was not significantly associated with increased risk of gout.
Many patients have heard that cherry juice is good for gout. But is it? A number of websites that offer cherry products for sale assure us that it is. A PubMed search combining gout with permutations of the word cherry turned up exactly 2 interventional trials. In one study, plasma urate levels declined 14.5% 5 hours following ingestion of 280 g of red Bing cherries following an overnight fast. Other fruits were not effective. The subjects of the study were 10 healthy premenopausal women of normal weight with a normal mean plasma urate level.192 A trial of cherry juice in marathon runners showed a 2 to 3 mg/dL lower uric acid level post-race compared with placebo, but in that particular trial it was unclear if cherry juice enhanced uric acid excretion or decreased uric acid production.193 The baseline uric acid level was also slightly lower in the cherry juice group. Both a hypouricemic effect and an anti-inflammatory effect have been attributed to cherry juice.193,194
The hypouricemic effect of cherries may not be attributable to the vitamin C content. While acerola cherries are very high in vitamin C (4700 mg/280 g), most American varieties contain much less (19.6 mg/280 g for sweet cherries, 28 mg/280 g for tart cherries).195 One cup of raw cherries (with pits) weighs 140 g (sweet) or 155 g (tart).195 A study done in 1950 of 12 gout patients suggested that 0.5 pound (0.2 kg) of cherries (several varieties were effective) or an equivalent amount of cherry juice prevented gout attacks.196 The mechanism of action is unclear. It is unfortunate that there is a dearth of data about such a wholesome and good-tasting potential remedy for gout.
Does vitamin C reduce uric acid levels? In one small study, 4 g caused a uricosuric effect within a few hours. A few subjects took 8 g/day and were noted to have reduced serum uric acid by 1.2 to 3.1 g/dL.197 A later prospective cohort study found that each 500 mg increase in vitamin C intake was associated with a multivariate relative risk of 0.83 for gout compared with those who took no supplement.198 This subject was also reviewed by Gao and colleagues.199
Hypourecemic therapy should be considered for most gouty patients, including those with end stage renal disease and nephrolithiasis. The main reason to use hypourecemic treatment is to prevent long-term complications of gout such as urate nephropathy, urate kidney stones, development of tophi and joint damage. Once the patient has suffered 1 attack of acute gout, the likelihood of recurrent attacks is extremely high. In patients not treated with urate-lowering drugs, 62% will experience a recurrence within 1 year of the initial attack, 78% by 2 years, and 89% by 5 years.200 For patient comfort, it is important to reduce or eliminate gouty flares. Thus, once urate-lowering medication is begun, the treatment is not intermittent; it is continuous and lifelong.
Uric acid level should be maintained below the solubility concentration of 6.8 mg/dL, preferably below 6.0 mg/dL. Still, some patients may continue to have clinically important deposits of MSU and/or attacks. Hypourecemic agents should not be started during the acute attack as that can exacerbate a flare. We recommend that patients who experience acute attacks while taking a hypourecemic agent do not discontinue the agent because the subsequent increase in serum uric acid level may worsen the attack.
On the other hand, hypourecemic therapy may not be necessary for patients with a frequency of gout attacks less then 2 or 3 times per year, who have no tophaceous deposits, and who have mildly elevated uric acid levels that may be amenable to lifestyle changes and nonpharmacological treatment (see above). Hypouricemic treatment may not be indicated in very elderly patients who may not require long-term prophylaxis against renal or joint damage. Such patients may do very well simply with colchicine prophylaxis against acute attacks.
Allopurinol and febuxostat (but not probenecid) both provide effective prophylaxis against nephrolithiasis in most gouty patients.
Allopurinol has been the cornerstone of urate-lowering treatment in the US since 1966, but despite potent xanthine oxidase inhibition and urate-lowering properties, allopurinol is commonly underdosed or poorly adhered to in long-term treatment.201–203
In patients with normal renal and liver function, allopurinol is generally started in a dose of 100 mg/day and increased by 100 mg/day weekly until 300 mg/day is being taken. The goal is to maintain a serum uric acid level <6.0 mg/dL. The dose may be gradually increased to 800 mg/day in patients with normal renal function, but the risk of serious idiosyncratic toxicity increases at higher doses, and with renal insufficiency (see below). Despite the wide dose range over which allopurinol is approved in the US, only a single randomized controlled trial has evaluated the efficacy and safety of allopurinol in doses exceeding 300 mg/day.204
The most common adverse effects are gastrointestinal upset and rash. The incidence of rash is estimated at ~2%.205,206 Unfortunately, serious toxicity is completely unpredictable and is considered to be allergic in nature. Allopurinol-induced rash usually resolves upon discontinuation of the drug, but rechallenge may lead to life-threatening toxic epidermal necrolysis. In the past, persons who required allopurinol could sometimes successfully undergo desensitization,207 but this is less commonly done since febuxostat has provided an alternative for allopurinol-allergic patients. The occurrence of xanthine urinary calculi is a theoretical possibility under low urinary flow conditions.
One rare but exceedingly important reaction to allopurinol is the allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS), which consists of rash (sometimes severe as in toxic epidermal necrolysis or exfoliative dermatitis), eosinophilia, leukocytosis, fever, hepatitis and progressive renal failure (usually due to interstitial nephritis).206 One particularly alarming feature of the syndrome is that it often is relentlessly progressive (and fatal) despite discontinuation of allopurinol and institution of corticosteroid therapy.208,209 There are no published trials or case reports that examined immunosuppressive treatments. The incidence of AHS is estimated at ~0.1%.205 Allopurinol is one of the more commonly used drugs that can cause severe hypersensitivity reactions.210 Risk factors for AHS include higher dose, renal insufficiency, diuretic use and higher oxypurinol concentrations.211 There may also be a genetic predisposition. HLA-B*501 was found in 100% of 51 Taiwanese patients with severe cutaneous reactions to allopurinol, but in only 20% of the general population.212
According to the allopurinol prescribing information,213 the frequency of hypersensitivity reactions may be increased in patients with decreased renal function who are receiving thiazides concurrently. It is also stated in the package insert that patients with decreased renal function require lower doses. “Therefore, a dose of 100 mg/day or 300 mg twice a week or perhaps less may be sufficient ...” With a creatinine clearance of 10 to 20 mL/min, a dose of 200 mg “is suitable”, and for creatinine clearance between 3 and 10 mL/min, the dose “should not exceed 100 mg”.
Allopurinol dosing in the presence of renal insufficiency has recently been reviewed.205,214,215 The main concern has been accumulation of the major metabolite oxypurinol which has a half-life of 18 to 30 hours in the presence of normal renal function, increasing up to a week in those with severely impaired renal function.205,216 Unfortunately reductions in serum uric acid level do not correlate well with oxypurinol concentrations, hence some persons are resistant to the urate-lowering effects even at very high serum levels of oxypurinol.
Recommendations for lower doses of allopurinol in the presence of renal insufficiency stem mainly from reports that most patients with AHS had pre-existing renal insufficiency and were receiving full doses of allopurinol.209,217,218 Critics point out that the relationship between oxypurinol concentrations and AHS remains unproven,219,220 and that no study has systematically demonstrated that dosage reduction in renal insufficiency reduces the risk of severe AHS. Some studies have found no relationship of AHS with dose in renal insufficiency.212,219,220 In other words, it is suggested that the renal insufficiency itself confers the risk, not the dose of allopurinol.219 Lastly, the increased risk of AHS (if any) must be balanced against the risk of inadequate control of gout that often follows from using the lower recommended doses.
The frequency of gouty attacks seems to decline once CKD patients are placed on dialysis.221,222 Nevertheless, when allopurinol is required by patients undergoing dialysis, it may be started at 100 mg every other day, to be administered post-dialysis. If dialysis is performed daily, then an additional 50% may be required post-dialysis.205 Interestingly, the package insert makes no mention of dialysis.213 It is noteworthy that the phosphate binder sevelamer has been reported to have a modest urate-lowering effect and may be useful as an adjunct.205,223
Unfortunately gout becomes more frequent in transplant recipients. Minimizing diuretic use and calcineurin dose seems to be important in renal transplant recipients. The management of gout in transplant patients can be difficult and has been reviewed.224,225
Although allopurinol and uricosuric agents may be used together, it is worth noting that uricosuric agents also tend to increase the excretion of oxypurinol, resulting in either a reduction of efficacy or a need for additional allopurinol.
The prescribing information Dosage and Administration section notes that the average dose is 400 to 600 mg/day for patients with moderately severe tophaceous gout (and presumably with normal renal function). Doses above 400 mg/day should be administered in divided doses. It is best to begin with 100 mg/day to minimize the risk of acute gout attacks and increase by 100 mg/day per week. The effect of any given dose adjustment upon serum uric acid level will generally be apparent by 1 week, occasionally longer if many tophaceous deposits are present. The maximum recommended dose is 800 mg/day.
Allopurinol has life-threatening interactions with azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine because metabolism of these immunosuppressive agents is inhibited by allopurinol, but they may be used together with proper dosage adjustment. Allopurinol may prolong anticoagulation times in those taking warfarin and may elevate theophylline levels by inhibiting metabolism of this purine derivative.
Neither allopurinol nor febuxostat is indicated for asymptomatic hyperuricemia, although this was fairly common practice in years past.226,227 Given the emerging risks of sustained hyperuricemia,16,64,228 debate on this question may be renewed, but the benefits of lowering uric acid must be balanced against the risk of serious reactions.
Febuxostat was approved in the US in 2008, the first FDA-approved hypouricemic agent in more than 40 years. It is a nonpurine inhibitor of xanthine oxidase. It has several potential advantages over allopurinol including tolerability in those who are allopurinol-hypersensitive, better retention of efficacy in renal insufficiency (without an increased incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, based on limited data), better efficacy than allopurinol in many persons and possibly more rapid dissolution of tophi. Potential problems include liver enzyme elevation, possibly more gastrointestinal symptomatology than with allopurinol and a small increase in the risk of vascular events compared with allopurinol. Questions that are still unanswered include dose and efficacy in patients with advanced renal failure or on dialysis, and whether there are special hazards in this population. Clinical trials are ongoing in this population.
Information on efficacy in persons with normal renal function comes from a short-term, randomized controlled trial.229 The primary endpoint for the trial was the proportion of patients with a serum uric acid level <6.0 mg/dL. This endpoint was achieved by 56%, 76% and 94% of those taking 40 mg, 80 mg and 120 mg/day of febuxostat, respectively, and by 0% in the placebo group. Perhaps surprisingly, the rate of gout flares in the 40 mg group (35%) was similar to that in the placebo group (37%). The rate of gout flares increased to 55% in those taking 120 mg. Concomitant colchicine provided effective prophylaxis against flares, reducing the rate to 8% to 13%. Doses of febuxostat approved in the US are 40 mg and 80 mg/day.
A subsequent 1-year trial compared doses of 80 mg and 120 mg with allopurinol 300 mg.230 Entry criteria included a serum uric acid >8.0 mg/dL and a serum creatinine <1.50 mg/dL. (This study has been criticized because the dose of allopurinol could not be increased, as it typically would in real life). By the final visit, a serum uric acid level <6.0 mg/dL was achieved by 81%, 82% and 39%, respectively. In subjects with a baseline serum uric acid level >10.0 mg/dL, the primary endpoint was achieved by 47%, 44% and 8% respectively. There was a trend toward more rapid dissolution of tophi in the febuxostat groups (83% reduction in tophus surface area in the 40 mg febuxostat group versus 50% reduction in the allopurinol group), although this difference did not achieve statistical significance, perhaps because a relatively small percentage of subjects had tophi at baseline. (Our observations in clinical practice suggest that febuxostat dissolves tophi significantly faster than allopurinol.) There were more rashes in the allopurinol group. The incidence of liver enzyme elevation was similar in all 3 groups. It is difficult to know if febuxostat is superior to allopurinol in dissolving tophi since the dose of allopurinol was not increased beyond 300 mg/day, as it would be in real life.
Doses above 120 mg/day did not significantly reduce uric acid further.231
According to the package insert, there are insufficient data to make a recommendation in patients with severe renal insufficiency (<30 mL/min), and “caution is advised,” but it is not considered a contraindication.179 The Cmax and area under the plasma concentration time curve for febuxostat and for 3 active metabolites are increased in severe renal insufficiency. There are no published data in patients receiving dialysis.179
Febuxostat works fairly quickly; treatment begins with 40 mg/day. If serum uric acid is not less than 6.0 mg/dL by 2 weeks, the dose may be increased to 80 mg/day. Mean reduction in serum uric acid level is 40% and 56% at 40 mg/day and 80 mg/day respectively and is similar in those with and without renal insufficiency, in contrast to allopurinol. Half-life of the parent compound and of major metabolites is significantly prolonged in persons with renal insufficiency, but this does not appear to be clinically important. Elimination is partially hepatic, allowing greater dosage flexibility in those with renal impairment. Transaminase elevation greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal occurs in 2% to 3% of patients and is similar in this regard to allopurinol. It is recommended to follow liver enzymes periodically, certainly by 2 months after beginning treatment.
The association of cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke) with allopurinol treatment remains unsettled. In Phase 3 studies, rates of events per 100 patient-years of exposure were: placebo 0, febuxostat 40 mg 0, febuxostat 80 mg 1.09 and allopurinol 0.60.179 In long-term extension studies, the rates were 0.97 for febuxostat 80 mg and 0.58 for allopurinol (there was no placebo group). In all these cases the confidence intervals overlapped, but there seems to be a trend. As noted in the package insert,179 a causal relationship has not been established. Cardiovascular disease is not a contraindication to the use of febuxostat or allopurinol, but the febuxostat package insert further recommends that the practitioner “monitor for signs and symptoms of MI and stroke”.179 Given the ability of both febuxostat and allopurinol to dissolve tophi, it is hypothesized that these agents may destabilize plaque (which may contain urate) in the walls of blood vessels.
Febuxostat is expected to be at least as effective as allopurinol for prophylaxis of nephrolithiasis, based on its mechanism of action.
Because febuxostat is a xanthine oxidase inhibitor, it prolongs the half-life of purine analogs such as azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine and theophylline, similar to the case with allopurinol. This is a potentially life-threatening interaction, and according to the package insert, febuxostat is contraindicated with the above 3 drugs. Hypersensitivity to allopurinol is not a contraindication to use of febuxostat.
Febuxostat is more expensive than generic allopurinol, costing approximately US$166 for 30 tablets.
In clinical trials, adverse effects associated with febuxostat included rash (<2% incidence), but without reported severe cutaneous reactions. Incidence of rash with febuxostat 80 mg/day was similar to that with allopurinol 300 mg/day. Diarrhea and elevated hepatic transaminases occurred in small proportions of patients. In current clinical practice, to contain drug costs, the primary use of febuxostat is reserved for patients with allopurinol hypersensitivity, intolerance, or treatment failure, including those in whom uricosuric therapy is not indicated or has failed.
Hyperuricemia in the vast majority (85% to 90%) of gouty patients results from impaired renal uric acid excretion rather than from overproduction.232 In these individuals, renal uric acid clearance is subnormal (<6 mL/min), so that maintenance of the balance between urate production and disposal can be achieved only at a saturating serum urate level, a circumstance predisposing to urate crystal formation and deposition. Although uricosuric agents provide a rational and even preferable means to lower serum uric acid in these patients, this class of urate-lowering agents is prescribed infrequently in the US.201 In general, the ideal candidate for a uricosuric agent is the gouty patient who is younger than 60 years of age, has a creatinine clearance greater than 80 mL/min, a 24-hour urinary uric acid excretion of less than 800 mg on a general diet and no history of renal calculi.
Probenecid is the only potent uricosuric agent available in the US. It acts by interfering with renal urate or anion exchange, thus inhibiting proximal tubular uric acid reabsorption.88 The infrequent use of probenecid (<5% of treated gout patients) likely reflects several circumstances: the availability of allopurinol and febuxostat; the requirement for multiple daily dosing; diminished or complete loss of urate-lowering efficacy in gout patients with moderate or more advanced CKD; relative contraindication in patients with prior urolithiasis or uric acid overproduction; a perception that it is less effective than allopurinol; many drug–drug interactions. The maintenance dosage of probenecid ranges from 500 mg/day to 3.0 g/day and must be taken in divided doses. Rash, gastrointestinal complaints and hypersensitivity occur in approximately 5% of patients. Although serious toxicity is rarely reported (it is perceived as safer than allopurinol in that regard), approximately one-third of patients become intolerant and discontinue it.
Alkalinization of the urine has been recommended when using a uricosuric agent to decrease the risk of forming uric acid calculi. Some authors believe that adequate hydration may be sufficient to avoid this complication.
Benzbromarone, a uricosuric drug not commercially available in the US and many other countries, is a potent but potentially hepatotoxic agent. The drug is metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 system and is effective in patients with moderate renal impairment. “Standard doses” of benzbromarone (100 mg/day) produce greater hypouricemic effects than ‘standard doses’ of allopurinol (300 mg/day) or probenecid (1000 mg/day).233,234 In a recently published study of “allopurinol-intolerant” patients, 92% of patients given benzbromarone were successfully treated to sUA <5 mg/dL compared with 65% of patients given probenecid.234
Sulfinpyrazone, another uricosuric agent, is no longer available in the US, mainly because of the potential for serious gastrointestinal toxicity.
Losartan and fenofibrate are drugs developed for indications other than urate-lowering but have modest uricosuric effects. They are thus useful urate-lowering adjuncts in selected patients. Urate-lowering effects of fenofibrate or losartan are generally in the range of 12% to 20%, respectively.235
Aspirin has a urate-retaining effect on the kidney at low doses (<3 g/day), but a marked uricosuric effect at high doses (>3 g/day). Even mini-dose aspirin can affect serum uric acid. In one study of elderly patients, aspirin in a dose of 75 mg/day raised sUA by 0.27 mg/dL, 150 mg/day raised it less and 325 mg/day did not raise sUA.10 Creatinine clearance declined 12% to 13% regardless of dose, corresponding to a serum creatinine rise of ~0.04 mg/dL. Interestingly, significant effects on creatinine clearance were largely confined to subjects with lower serum albumin levels, presumably because of higher free salicylate levels in that group. Concomitant diuretic use seemed to increase the aspirin effect.
Uricase could enable accelerated dissolution of tophi over intervals of weeks or months instead of years. Uricase has the potential to dramatically improve the chronic crippling effects of tophaceous gout in those who are intolerant or unresponsive to current therapies.
Pegylation of uricase helps to suppress its immunogenicity and to increase its half-life. In one pivotal, Phase 3 study in patients with particularly severe gout, ~70% of whom had visible tophi, treatment with recombinant, pegylated intravenous uricase (pegloticase) 8 mg every 2 weeks achieved the target serum uric acid level of <6 mg/dL at 6 months in ~42%.12 This regimen also achieved complete resolution of tophi in 20% of patients by 13 weeks and ~40% by 25 weeks. The immunogenicity of uricases, including pegloticase, has limited their tolerability and efficacy. Antibodies to these drugs develop in most patients, despite the use of pegylation, and infusion reactions are common. Such reactions were observed in more than a quarter of patients. High titers of antipegloticase antibodies were linked with infusion reactions and were often associated with loss of efficacy. An important point to note is that in the first few months of pegloticase therapy, acute gout flares are frequent, up to 80% of patients in one study12 but taper off with continued therapy in responders.
Uricase treatment has the capability to induce oxidative stress mediated by generation of hydrogen peroxide.236 The presence of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency is an exclusion criterion for uricase treatment, to prevent drug-induced methemoglobinemia and hemolysis. Short-term and long-term safety are not yet clearly defined for uricase therapy. It has been proposed that uricase therapy should be reserved for selected patients who could potentially benefit from accelerated tophus debulking, for example, to resolve incapacitating tophi linked with active synovitis, or under circumstances where patients have failed to respond to appropriate doses of oral urate-lowering therapies. At the time of writing (August, 2010) pegloticase (Krystexxa™; Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) has been resubmitted to the FDA for approval for selected gout indications.
The critical importance of URAT-1 to uric acid homeostasis has made it a prime target for therapeutic manipulation. RDEA594 is a novel inhibitor of URAT-1 that was recently found in a Phase 2a trial to perform about as well as the allopurinol comparator, and was well tolerated.237 Studies are ongoing. RDEA594 is a major metabolite of RDEA806, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor currently in trials for treatment of HIV.238
Treatment of the acute gout attack in patients with renal insufficiency has been recently reviewed.215 NSAIDs are frequently not an option in such cases. Colchicine may be used, but the maintenance dose must be reduced. There is a real long-term risk of myopathy and/or neuropathy in renal insufficiency with maintenance doses as low as 1.2 mg/day, even with relatively short courses. Cyclosporine also interacts with colchicine to increase colchicine levels. Corticosteroids frequently become the agents of choice. While local joint injections result in the least systemic exposure, systemic steroids are frequently necessary. Systemic corticosteroids must be administered in divided doses 2 or even 3 times per day to achieve rapid control.
Whereas most gouty dialysis patients enjoy a marked reduction in the frequency of gout attacks, the opposite occurs post-kidney transplant. Patients receiving cyclosporine have been reported to have an incidence between 3.5% and 28%; without cyclosporine the incidence is between 0% and 8%. Several mechanisms of action have been proposed.215,225
Tacrolimus is slightly less offensive in its effect on uric acid handling.215 There are no published data on the use of febuxostat in transplant patients. Allopurinol remains the hypouricemic agent of choice as a rule, but there is a potentially life-threatening interaction with azathioprine, as noted above.
The authors have no financial disclosures and no conflicts of interest with this work.