Microorganisms in the environment are capable of synthesizing, taking up and using Phns (
Kononova and Nesmeyanova, 2002;
Quinn et al., 2007;
White and Metcalf, 2007;
Metcalf and van der Donk, 2009;
Singh, 2009). Pathways for Phn biosynthesis are less well-studied than those for its degradation (
Quinn et al., 2007) and analysis of genomic and metagenome data available from the hot springs (
Bhaya et al., 2007) did not provide compelling evidence that Phn biosynthetic pathways are present in the microbial mat community. However, we did demonstrate that
Syn OS-B′ can grow well in medium in which the only source of P is MePhn, EtPhn or AePhn, contingent on an acclimation period of approximately 3 weeks in the presence of Phn compounds (
Adams et al., 2008). Over the initial period of acclimation, the presence of Phn in the medium suppressed the growth of the cells on Pi, suggesting that Phns may function as an antimetabolites and block certain cellular activities (
Kononova and Nesmeyanova, 2002).
Syn OS-B′ can use MePhn or EtPhn as a sole P source in the light, and as a consequence cells release either methane or ethane. These results suggest that in the light,
Syn OS-B′ cells take up Phns, which is then further metabolized by the cytoplasmic C–P lyase. Under these conditions, released Pi is assimilated whereas some of the reduced carbon moiety of the Phn is released into the atmosphere as methane or ethane. However, in the dark, the reduced C moiety of the Phn is integrated into the metabolic circuitry of the cell, may be through conversion to acetyl CoA. In other systems that have been studied, biodegradation appears to involve ribosylated organophosphonate intermediates (
Avila et al., 1991;
Hove-Jensen et al., 2010) and possibly result in the generation of more than one reduced C species. Transcripts encoding Phn transporter/C–P lyase subunits increase when
Syn OS-B′ cells are starved for P (in the absence or presence of MePhn, EtPhn or AePhn), whereas the Phnase transcripts are not. Therefore, it is most likely that the Phn transporter/C–P lyase system is important for Phn use in
Syn OS-B′ under the conditions used in this study (although we cannot eliminate the possibility that some Phn use is a consequence of Phnases). The finding that little, if any, of the organic C is released as a volatile compound in the dark, and that cells grow in the dark when the only reduced C is in the form of Phn, strongly indicates that
Syn OS-B′ can exploit the energetic component of Phn at a time when it is limited in its ability to generate chemical bond energy through either photosynthesis or respiratory metabolism. Indeed, the Phn transport/C–P lyase system would allow
Syn OS-B′ cells to transport the entire Phn molecule into the cytoplasm, where the C–P bond would be cleaved. The C backbones released could be integrated into assimilation pathways through the activities of enzymes such as acetyl-CoA synthetase (CYB_0240, CYA_0472) and ATP citrate lyase (CYB_1908, CYA_1739).
In contrast to
Syn OS-B′,
Syn OS-A maintained in medium containing MePhn, EtPhn or AePhn did not emit methane or ethane either in the light or dark and was unable to use any of these Phn compounds as a sole C source for growth in the dark. Apparently,
Syn OS-A can access the P moiety of Phn, but cannot metabolize the reduced C moiety of the molecule.
Syn OS-A appears to use various Phnases and two genes encoding putative Phnases are induced during exposure of
Syn OS-A to specific Phn substrates. In
Salmonella sp. Phnase is induced under P starvation (
Jiang et al., 1995) but in
Rhizobium huakuii PMY1, Phnase are not under control of the Pho regulon. The ability of
Syn OS-A to induce specific Phnases, in the presence of P, might indicate that Phns are available in these environments. However, information regarding the source, levels and use of P sources, including Phns, in many environments, including hot springs is limited and suffers from technical challenges (
Stauffer and Thompson, 1978;
Stauffer, 1982;
Papke et al., 2003).
Some Phnases may be membrane associated potentially accessing the extracellular environment (
Mendz et al., 2005), as a consequence, Pi may be generated in the extracellular space and then rapidly taken up and assimilated by the cells. If so,
Syn OS-A might be unable to use EtPhn or AePhn as a sole source of C because it cannot take up the extracellular C compound released during Phn catalysis. Phnase transcripts from CYA_1475 and CYA_2058 accumulate in the presence of EtPhn and AePhn, but not MePhn, and yet
Syn OS-A can use all of these compounds as P sources. These results suggest that other as yet unidentified Phnases may be involved in the use of MePhn by
Syn OS-A, and that substrate specificity may be associated with each of the putative Phnases (
Kononova and Nesmeyanova, 2002;
White and Metcalf, 2007). There may be other novel mechanisms by which Phns are degraded by microorganisms (
Fox and Mendz, 2006;
Quinn et al., 2007).
Recently,
Karl et al. (2008) have shown that microbial Phn degradation results in methane generation in aerobic marine environments, providing evidence for ‘unconventional' methanogenesis. This bacterial catabolism of Phns might explain why oceanic methane concentrations vastly exceed the levels predicted by basic biological and chemical principles (
Ingall, 2008). The ability of
Trichodesmium sp. to metabolize as well as produce Phn compounds may explain why this cyanobacterium is so successful in low-P environments (
Dyhrman and Haley, 2006;
Dyhrman et al., 2007,
2009). Marine unicellular cyanobacteria contain putative Phn transporters and Phnases (
Tetu et al., 2009). Marine bacteria including
Vibro sp. and
Planctomyces sp. have the ability to grow on Phns (
Dyhrman et al., 2007). Moreover, the widespread distribution of the
phnA gene, which encodes a phosphonoacetate hydrolase, underscores the potential importance of phosphonates in marine ecosystems, including corals (
Gilbert et al., 2009;
Martinez et al., 2009;
Thomas et al., 2010).
Methane production in low-sulfate, hot-spring algal–bacterial mats has been ascribed to methanogenic bacteria as well as eukaryotic organisms (
Ward, 1978). Here we show that the Phn transporter/C–P lyase genes and putative Phnase genes are expressed
in situ, so cyanobacteria could produce methane as a by-product of Phn metabolism (levels of Phns in these environments have not been measured). Transcript profiles suggest that the Phn transporter/C–P lyase genes are expressed when the mat is anoxic, suggesting that the level of the Phn transporter/C–P lyase is higher at night. In contrast, Phnase genes are expressed in mid afternoon when the cells are photosynthesizing and are not likely to require additional fixed C. Hence, Phn cleavage, possibly in the extracellular environment during the day, would allow cells to capture the P in the molecule whereas the fixed C moiety would be released into the environment where it could be exploited by heterotrophs in the mat. These results highlight the ability of terrestrial cyanobacteria to use multiple systems to acquire and metabolize Phns from the environment, but investigations to elucidate the precise role of these specific activities in shaping population dynamics and micro-niche habitation are only just beginning.