PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Pediatrics. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 May 24.
Published in final edited form as:
Pediatrics. 1996 March; 97(3): 375–379.
PMCID: PMC3100715
NIHMSID: NIHMS290018

High-dose Corticotropin (ACTH) Versus Prednisone for Infantile Spasms: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Study

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of corticotropin (ACTH) (150 U/m2/day) and prednisone (2 mg/kg/day), given for 2 weeks, in suppressing clinical spasms and hypsarrhythmic electroencephalogram (EEG) in infantile spasms (IS). ACTH and prednisone are standard treatments for IS. ACTH at high doses causes severe dose- and duration-dependent side effects, but may be superior to prednisone, based on retrospective or uncontrolled studies. Blinded prospective studies have shown equal efficacy of prednisone and low-dose ACTH, and low versus high-dose ACTH.

Design

A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study.

Subjects and Methods

Patient population consisted of consecutive infants fulfilling entry criteria, including the presence of clinical spasms, hypsarrhythmia (or variants) during a full sleep cycle video-EEG, and no prior steroid/ACTH treatment. Response required both cessation of spasms and elimination of hypsarrhythmia by the end of the 2-week treatment period, as determined by an investigator “blinded” to treatment. Treatment of re-sponders was tapered off over 12 days; those failing one hormone were crossed-over to the other.

Results

Of 34 eligible infants, 29 were enrolled. Median age of patients was 6 months. Twenty-two infants were “symptomatic” with known or suspected cause, and seven were cryptogenic (two normal). Of 15 infants randomized to ACTH, 13 responded by both EEG and clinical criteria (86.6%); seizures stopped in an additional infant, but EEG remained hypsarrhythmic (considered a failure). Four of 14 patients given prednisone responded (28.6%, with complete clinical-EEG correlation), significantly less than with ACTH, (χ2 test).

Conclusions

Using a prospective, randomized approach, a 2-week course of high-dose ACTH is superior to 2 weeks of prednisone for treatment of IS, as assessed by both clinical and EEG criteria.

Infantile spasms (IS) is an age-specific seizure disorder of infants.16 It is relatively common (1:2000–4000 births),7 and has distinctive clinical and electro-graphic features.16 The syndrome of IS consists of myoclonic seizures accompanied by an hypsarrhythmic electroenephalogram (EEG) pattern.8 Symptomatic IS occurs in infants with a variety of antecedent central nervous system insults (eg, malformations, infections); the cryptogenic form is found in otherwise normal infants or those with no predisposing factors.1,6 The EEG pattern, response to hormonal therapy, and poor outcome distinguish IS from a variety of other myoclonic epilepsies of infancy.1,2 The intellectual outcome of the great majority of affected infants is poor regardless of treatment, and over half develop other seizure types.15,7 Therefore, IS continues to attract research concerning both pathogenesis and therapy.

IS is generally resistant to conventional anticonvulsants. However, in 1958, Sorel9 reported on the efficacy of corticotropin (ACTH) for the seizures, and ACTH and a synthetic glucocorticoid (GC), prednisone, have become the standard therapy for IS. On a theoretical basis, ACTH, especially in high doses, may be expected to be more effective than prednisone.5,1012 However, a double-blinded series13 demonstrated equal efficacy of short courses of 20 to 30 U ACTH and prednisone in the treatment of IS.

Further issues of ACTH dose and duration of treatment have not been resolved. High doses of ACTH (150 U/m2 body surface/day) have been advocated, based on a response rate of >80% in uncontrolled trials.10,14 Low-dose ACTH (<40 U/day) has been found effective in retrospective studies.15,16 A recent controlled study comparing high-dose long duration ACTH to low-dose (20–30 U/day) short treatment found equal efficacy of both regimens.17 Overall response rate (50%), however, was quite low.

We compared the efficacy of 2-week courses of high-dose ACTH and prednisone for the treatment of IS. The study was a single-blinded comparison of response, using video-EEG as the objective measure of response to treatment.

Methods

Definitions

  1. IS was defined according to Jeavons.6 Because an outcome of mental retardation could not be assessed on presentation, the criterion was not used.
  2. Cryptogenic IS was defined as the absence of etiology despite a battery of tests described below. An abnormal developmental status did not preclude defining an infant as having cryptogenic IS, because drug effects or deterioration with the onset of IS could not be excluded.

Study Population

Infants with clinical IS and no previous steroid or ACTH treatment were considered for the study if parents were willing to consent to randomized treatment. All subjects underwent a 24-hour video-EEG to ascertain the presence of hypsarrhythmia or its variants,8,18 and the presence and frequency of epileptic myoclonic events. Thirty-six consecutive infants met clinical and EEG criteria for entry. Two were ineligible for ACTH/GC treatment due to severe hypertension (1), and resolution of spasms after shunt placement (1). The remaining 34 patients were eligible for the study. Twenty-nine were entered into the study, and five were not, due to parental refusal (2), unavailability of legal guardian (2), and other issues (1).

Study Design

The study was approved by the Childrens Hospital Los Angeles Institutional Review Board.

Patients who met clinical and electrographic criteria were entered into the study subsequent to an informed consent signing by parents or legal guardians. A computer-generated random-number list determined treatment. No stratification was employed.

An evaluation for the etiology of IS was undertaken in all infants. This consisted, at a minimum, of the prenatal and postnatal history, physical and neurological exams, neuroimaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), blood amino acids, lactate and pyruvate, and urine organic acids. Additional studies were obtained guided by clinical observations. Before beginning treatment, serum electrolytes, glucose, and blood pressure were measured.

Treatment lasted for 2 weeks (Table 1). ACTH (ACTHARGEL, Rhône-Poulenc-Rorer, Collegeville, PA; 150 U/m2/day) was given intramuscularly in two divided doses. Prednisone (2 mg/kg/day) was given orally in two divided doses. Seizure frequency was monitored by parents who maintained seizure diaries. Side effects such as hypertension and hyperglycemia were monitored: glycosuria was checked on each specimen for the duration of treatment, and blood pressure was measured bi-weekly. Irritability and voracious appetite were the most frequent side effects, but no infant required stopping or modifying treatment.

TABLE 1
Study Treatment Regimen for Infantile Spasms

After 2 weeks, a repeat video-EEG was performed, and clinical and EEG response assessed. Video-EEG lasted 4 to 24 hours, always including a full sleep-wake cycle. For a patient to be considered a responder to treatment, both video-EEG and clinical responses were necessary: clinical response consisted of a complete cessation of IS events. Electrographic response consisted of resolution of the hypsarrhythmic pattern on both sleep and wake EEG. The emergence of background slowing or other epileptiform patterns was considered a positive response. Video-EEG studies were interpreted by an investigator (E.J.H.) who was not informed of treatment assignment.

Infants with persistent IS or hypsarrhythmia were offered the alternative treatment. Responders were tapered off ACTH or prednisone as described in Table 1.

Statistical Considerations

Treatment groups were compared using the χ2 test. The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine potential differences (eg, age) between treatment groups, and the effect of discrepancy in mean age among treatment groups was analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel test.

Results

Patient characteristics are summarized in Tables 2 and and3.3. Ethnic background was representative of the Childrens Hospital Los Angeles patient population. There were twelve infants with Hispanic surnames (six in each treatment group). Eleven infants were white non-Hispanic (five in the ACTH group), three were Asian, and three African-American.

TABLE 2
Characteristics of Infants Treated With ACTH
TABLE 3
Characterisitcs of Infants Treated With Prednisone

Twenty-two infants had “symptomatic” IS, with known or suspected cause, and seven had cryptogenic IS, but only two were entirely developmentally and neurologically normal at the time of diagnosis. Of 29 subjects, 15 were randomized to ACTH and 14 to prednisone. Mean age of the prednisone group was higher than that of the ACTH group (7.5 vs 5.1 months), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .06 Mann-Whitney test). Cryptogenic etiology, male sex, other seizures, or duration of IS did not differ significantly between treatment groups.

Of 15 infants randomized to ACTH, 13 responded by both EEG and clinical criteria (86.6%); seizures stopped in an additional infant, but EEG remained hypsarrhythmic (considered a failure). Four of 14 patients (28.6%) given prednisone responded by both EEG and clinical criteria. No patient had clinical response only. The different response rate between treatment groups was significant: P = .002 χ2 test). The difference between ACTH and prednisone remained significant even after accounting for the potential confounding effect of age. Weighted relative response adjusted for age (Mantel-Haenszel test) was 3.94 (confidence interval 1.44 – 10.77; P = .0026).

The two infants who failed ACTH received prednisone for 2 weeks, and one responded by both clinical and EEG criteria. Of the 10 infants who failed prednisone, nine received ACTH (for 2 weeks), and eight responded (88%). Two of the five infants who were ineligible for the study received ACTH and responded. The remaining infants received prednisone, valproate, or clonazepam, which did not control the IS within a 2-week period.

Length of follow-up period was insufficient for comparing cognitive outcome and development of other seizures in the ACTH and prednisone-treated infants. This type of comparison was further confounded by the fact that nine infants initially randomized to prednisone went on to receive ACTH. IS recurred by clinical and EEG criteria in two infants in the ACTH group, and seven infants in each group eventually developed other seizure types (Tables 2 and and33).

Two ACTH-treated infants and one prednisone-treated infant have normal neurologic and cognitive development as of last contact (Tables 2 and and3).3). These include the two who were considered normal on presentation. The third is an infant with cryptogenic IS and abnormal exam on presentation who was treated with ACTH.

Discussion

In this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study, high-dose19 ACTH was significantly superior to prednisone in terminating IS and normalizing the EEC No demographic or etiologic differences between treatment groups confounded this effect. The prednisone group was slightly older, but, when age was accounted for, the efficacy of ACTH remained significantly higher than that of prednisone (weighted relative response 3.94, Mantel-Haenszel test P = .0026). Moreover, younger age at onset has been associated with a worse prognosis, so that somewhat older infants (the prednisone group) would be expected to have a more favorable response.

The protocol design utilized a short-term (2-week) treatment. The rationale for this duration was based on two lines of observation: first, IS has a significant spontaneous remission rate.20 In untreated infants, IS often evolves into a variety of other seizure types.1-5,7,20 Thus, prolonged (3 to 10 months) therapy with a large number of agents has been reported as “effective” (reviewed in Reference 5). Further, in the majority of studies describing the time-course of treatment responses, patients who benefitted from therapy did so within the first week or two.9,13 In the current study, median response time for ACTH was 2 days, and for prednisone, 3.5 days. No patient responded clinically more than I week after treatment began. Follow-up EEGs were obtained only at the end of treatment, precluding evaluation of the time-course of elimination of hypsarrhythmia. In a single case, ACTH treatment abolished clinical spasms in 2 days, yet video-EEG continued to show a modified hypsarrhythmia pattern on the 15th day of treatment (the patient was considered a failure). These results suggest that the short length of treatment did not bias outcome: both ACTH and prednisone exerted their therapeutic effects within days.

In a recent report, Hrachovy et al20 compared ACTH in a regimen comparable to ours, to a low-dose (20 or 30 U/day) regimen. They found comparable efficacy of both ACTH dosage schedules, but had a low response rate (50%) overall. In a previous controlled, blinded, randomized study, the same authors described the equivalence of short-term low-dose ACTH and prednisone.13 The response rate (33% to 42% before cross-over) was substantially lower that obtained in other studies using high-dose ACTH, and was comparable to that obtained with prednisone in the current study.

The reasons for the different response rates are obscure. Hrachovy et al emphasized that clinical outcome measures were unreliable.9,13,17,20 They advocated EEG response criteria, ie, the elimination of hypsarrhythmia and its variants.9,18 The current study employed both EEG and clinical measures. Posttreatment EEGs, encompassing a minimum of a complete sleep cycle revealed persistent hypsarrhythmia during slow-wave sleep in only one patient who was free of clinical spasms.

Whether the response rate to ACTH or prednisone differs in infants with the “cryptogenic” versus the “symptomatic” form of IS is a complex issue. The definition of cryptogenic is inconsistent among investigators: some consider as cryptogenic infants with no known cause for their IS, even with an abnormal neurodevelopmental status.15 With the advent of contemporary diagnostic tools, the number of infants with apparently cryptogenic IS has drastically declined. This has made comparison of results of older and more recent studies difficult. Conversely, previously normal infants may lose developmental milestones at the onset of continuous abnormal neuronal activity (hypsarrhythmia) with resulting abnormal neurological examination. In the current study, seven infants (24%) had no definite etiology for their IS. Only two (7% of total) were neurologically normal, and responded to ACTH and prednisone. Five infants had abnormal neurologic examinations (cognitive, motor, or both) in the absence of etiology for their IS. The three infants randomized to prednisone failed to respond; of the two such infants assigned to ACTH, one responded. This response pattern was not significantly different from that of infants with “symptomatic” IS.

The mechanisms by which glucocorticoids and ACTH control IS and improve or normalize the EEG remain speculative.5,11,12,2225 ACTH may function as a promoter of adrenal glucocorticoid secretion: high-dose ACTH may result in higher or more sustained plasma Cortisol.10 Alternatively, ACTH may exert therapeutic effects directly on the central nervous system, in addition to or independent of Cortisol release.11,12,22 ACTH analogues devoid of steroidogenic effects, however, are not effective for IS.26,27 Both agents, acting via a negative feedback loop, suppress the synthesis and secretion of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) (reviewed in 5). CRH is a potent convulsant in the rodent, with age-specific potency during infancy.23,24 ACTH is more effective than prednisone in suppression of CRH gene expression, and affects cortical as well as hypothalamic CRH levels.28 CRH excess, secondary to antecedent activation of the CRH-ACTH-cortisol stress-transduction pathway, may play a mechanistic role in IS.5,2325 Seizures may be “triggered” by subsequent stress-induced plasma glucocorticoid secretion, eg, with immunization.2930

The minimal effective dose of ACTH remains un-clear. Ito et al16 reported the results of retrospective analysis of patient response to graded ACTH doses. Based on nine patients, they concluded that 0.6 U/kg/day (6 units for a 10-kg infant) resulted in seizure cessation (8/9), and 0.8 U/kg/day eliminated hypsarrhythmia. Beyond that “threshold” dose, no dose effect was seen.16 Authors in this country10,19,21 and abroad14 strongly advocate high-dose ACTH, based on both response and plasma hormone data.10

IS is a form of epilepsy that is age-specific to infancy.31 It is triggered at a vulnerable developmental stage in the setting of a previously stressed or injured central nervous system.5 Whether the spasms per se or the ongoing hypsarrhythmic epileptiform neuronal activity further contribute to the poor cognitive outcome is not clear.15,9,11,14,21 Recently, prolonged duration of IS before treatment was correlated with graver intellectual prognosis.32 In the current study, IS duration before treatment did not predict short-term response rate. Further studies on the relative efficacy of ACTH and prednisone on long-term cognitive outcome of infants are needed. These require a population of neurologically normal (“cryptogenic”) infants. Given the small number of such infants in clinical series, a prospective multi-center collaborative effort is indicated.

In conclusion, using a 2-week regimen, high-dose ACTH is superior to prednisone for suppression of clinical spasms and hypsarrhythmia in IS. Further studies of the mechanisms by which ACTH acts are needed.5,31 These may point the way to the development of novel, more direct therapies for age-specific epilepsies such as IS.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Linda Chan of the Childrens Hospital Los Angeles Biostatistics Core for expert help.

Abbreviations

IS
infantile spasms
EEG
electroencephalogram
ACTH
corticotropin
GC
glucocorticoid
CRH
corticotrop-in-releasing hormone

References

1. Aicardi J. Infantile spasms and related syndromes. In: Aicardi J, editor. Epilepsy in Children. New York: Raven Press; 1986. pp. 17–38.
2. Jeavons PM, Bower BD. Infantile spasms. Clin Devel Med. 1964;15:1–82.
3. Holmes GL. Diagnosis and Management of Seizures in Children. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1987. pp. 212–225.
4. Dreifuss FE. Pediatric epilepsy syndromes, an overview. Cleveland Clin J Med. 1989;56(Suppl):166–171. [PubMed]
5. Baram TZ. Pathophysiology of massive infantile spasms (MIS): perspective on the role of the brain adrenal axis. Ann Neurol. 1993;33:231–237. [PubMed]
6. Jeavons PM. West syndrome: proposal for a definition of epileptic syndromes in infancy, childhood and adolescence. In: Roger J, Dravet C, Bureau M, Dreifuss FE, Wolf P, editors. Epileptic Syndromes in Infancy, Childhood and Adolescence. John Libbey Eurotext; 1985. pp. 313–317.
7. Cowan LD, Hudson LS. The epidemiology and natural history of infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 1991;6:355–364. [PubMed]
8. Gibbs FA, Gibbs EL. Atlas of Electroencephalography. II. Epilepsy. Reading, MA: 1952.
9. Hrachovy RA, Frost JD., Jr . Infantile spasms: a disorder of the developing nervous system. In: Kellaway P, Noebels JL, editors. Problems and Concepts in Developmental Neurophysiology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1989. pp. 131–147.
10. Snead OC, Benton JW, Hosey LC, et al. Treatment of infantile spasms with high-dose ACTH: efficacy and plasma levels of ACTH and prednisone. Neurology. 1989;39:1027–1031. [PubMed]
11. Riikonen R. Infantile spasms: some new theoretical aspects. Epilepsia. 1983;24:159–168. [PubMed]
12. Pranzatelli MR. On the molecular mechanism of adrenocorticotrophic hormone in the CNS: neurotransmitters and receptors. Exp Neurol. 1994;125:142–161. [PubMed]
13. Hrachovy RA, Frost JD, Kellaway R, Zion TE. Double blind study of ACTH vs prednisone therapy in infantile spasms. J Pediatr. 1983;103:641–645. [PubMed]
14. Lerman P, Kivity S. The efficacy of corticotropin in primary infantile spasms. J Pediatr. 1982;101:294–296. [PubMed]
15. Willowby JA, Thurston DL, Holowach J. Infantile myoclonic seizures: an evaluation of ACTH and corticosteroid therapy. J Pediatr. 1966;69:1136–1138. [PubMed]
16. Ito M, Okuno T, Fujii T, et al. ACTH therapy in infantile spasms: relationship between dose of ACTH and initial effect or long-term prognosis. Pediatr Neurol. 1990;6:240–244. [PubMed]
17. Hrachovy RA, Frost JD, Glaze DG. High-dose long-duration versus low-dose short-duration corticotropin therapy for infantile spasms. J Pediatr. 1994;124:803–806. [PubMed]
18. Hrachovy RA, Frost JD, Kellaway P. Hypsarrhythmia: variations on the theme. Epilepsia. 1984;25:317–325. [PubMed]
19. Snead OC., III Treatment of infantile spasms. Pediatr Neurol. 1990;6:147–150. [PubMed]
20. Hrachovy RA, Glaze DG, Jr, Frost JD. A retrospective study of spontaneous remission and long-term outcome in patients with infantile spasms. Epilepsia. 1991;32:212–214. [PubMed]
21. Lombroso CT. A prospective study of infantile spasms: clinical and therapeutic considerations. Epilepsia. 1983;24:135–158. [PubMed]
22. Holmes GL. Effect of non-sex hormones on neuronal excitability, seizures, and the EEG. Epilepsia. 1991;32(Suppl 6):S11–S18. [PubMed]
23. Baram TZ, Schultz L. CRH is a rapid and potent convulsant in the infant rat. Brain Res. 1991;61:97–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Baram TZ, Hirsch E, Snead OC, III, Schultz L. CRH induced seizures in the infant brain originate in the amygdala. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:488–494. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Baram TZ, Mitchell WG, Snead OC, III, et al. Brain-adrenal axis hormones are altered in the cerebrospinal fluid of infants with massive infantile spasms. Neurology. 1992;42:1171–1175. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Willig RP. Lagenstein use of ACTH fragments in children with infantile spasms. Neuropediatrics. 1982;13:55–58. [PubMed]
27. Pentella K, Bachman DS, Sandman CA. Trial of an ACTH 4-9 analogue in children with intractable seizures. Neuropediatrics. 1982;13:59–62. [PubMed]
28. Frim DM, Robinson BG, Pasieka KB, Majzoub JA. Differential regulation of corticotropin releasing hormone mRNA in rat brain. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:E686–E692. [PubMed]
29. Rosen JB, Pishevar SK, Weiss SRB, Smith MA, et al. Glucocorticoid treatment increases the ability of CRH to induce seizures. Neurosci Lett. 1994;174:113–116. [PubMed]
30. Child Neurology Society Ad Hoc Committee. Consensus statement: pertussis immunization and the central nervous system. Ann Neurol. 1991;29:458–460. [PubMed]
31. Shinnar S, Moshe SL. Age specificity of seizure expression in genetic epilepsies. In: Anderson EE, Hauser WA, Leppik IE, Noebels JL, Rich SS, editors. Genetic Strategies in Epilepsy Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1991. pp. 69–85.
32. Koo B, Hwang PA, Logan WJ. Infantile spasms: outcome and prognostic factors of cryptogenic and symptomatic groups. Neurology. 1992;43:2322–2327. [PubMed]