Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of neurologyNeurologyAmerican Academy of Neurology
Neurology. 2011 May 24; 76(21): 1811–1816.
PMCID: PMC3100120

Adenosine 2A receptor availability in dyskinetic and nondyskinetic patients with Parkinson disease

A.F. Ramlackhansingh, MRCP,corresponding author S.K. Bose, PhD, I. Ahmed, MRCP, F.E. Turkheimer, PhD, N. Pavese, MD, and D.J. Brooks, MD, DSc



To investigate striatal adenosine A2A receptor availability in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) with and without levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs). While providing effective relief from the motor symptoms of PD, chronic levodopa use is associated with development of LIDs. A2A receptors are expressed on the bodies of indirect pathway medium spiny striatal neurons and on dopamine terminals and play a role in modulating dopamine transmission. A2A antagonists have antiparkinsonian activity by boosting levodopa efficacy. We aimed to study A2A receptor availability in patients with PD with and without LIDs using PET and [11C]SCH442416, an A2A antagonist.


Six patients with PD with and 6 without LIDs were studied withdrawn 12 hours from medication. Their PET findings were compared with 6 age-matched healthy controls. Using spectral analysis, [11C]SCH442416 regional volumes of distribution (VT) were computed for the caudate, putamen, and thalamus and binding potentials (BPND) reflecting the ratio of specific:nonspecific uptake were compared between groups.


A2A binding in the caudate and putamen of subjects with PD with LIDs was far higher (p = 0.026 and p = 0.036, respectively) than that of subjects with PD without LIDs, which lay within the control range. Thalamic A2A availability was similar for all 3 groups.


Patients with PD with LIDs show increased A2A receptor availability in the striatum. This finding is compatible with altered adenosine transmission playing a role in LIDs and provides a rationale for a trial of A2A receptor agents in the treatment of these motor complications.

Parkinson disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide.1 The prodrug levodopa remains the most effective oral therapy and is eventually offered to most patients with PD. Oral levodopa, however, is not without complications. Chronic exposure in PD is associated with the development of involuntary movements known as levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs) in around 50% of patients after 5 years and 90% after 10 years.2,3 LIDs complicate management and have been linked to increased mortality and weight loss.4

The pathogenesis of LIDs is thought to be linked to changes in the output of the striatum to the internal pallidum via direct and indirect pathways.57 Indirect pathway neurons express adenosine A2A receptors. Cynomolgus monkeys, lesioned with the nigral toxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), that subsequently develop dyskinesia after exposure to levodopa, showed significantly higher striatal A2A mRNA levels when compared to nondyskinetic monkeys and a normal control group.8 Human postmortem studies also demonstrate increased striatal A2A mRNA expression in patients with PD with dyskinesias.5

We hypothesize that dyskinetic patients with PD would have higher striatal A2A receptor availability compared to nondyskinetic subjects. We used [11C]SCH442416 PET as an in vivo marker of A2A availability. This nonxanthine radioligand binds selectively and reversibly to striatal A2A receptors with nanomolar affinity.9 Preclinical studies suggest that it is suitable for the in vivo imaging of adenosine A2A receptors with PET because of its high affinity and selectivity, good signal-to-noise ratio, and low levels of radioactive metabolites in the brains of rats and nonhuman primates.9,10



The size of the PD cohorts and control group was determined by power calculations based on the previously established low variance of the striatal binding potential for [11C]SCH442416 (SD of BPND ~0.2 in controls). Six subjects with PD with and 6 without dyskinesias were calculated to provide 80% power at a 5% error rate to detect an effect size of ΔBPND = 0.4.

Twelve patients with PD were recruited from local Movement Disorders clinics. All patients fulfilled UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria for idiopathic PD. Patients with significant comorbidities, including a previous history of any other neurologic condition, dementia, or depression, were excluded. The patient group consisted of 2 separate cohorts: 6 subjects had peak dose levodopa–induced choreic dyskinesias and a further 6 subjects were dyskinesia-free on this medication. The levodopa effective dose (LED) for each subject with PD was calculated as follows: 100 mg levodopa = 2 mg cabergoline = 1 mg pramipexole or 1 mg pergolide = 5 mg ropinirole = 4 mg rotigotine patch = 0.5 mg rasagiline. The conversion factors below were used for controlled release levodopa and levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone combination: modified release cocareldopa 25/100 (carbidopa 25 mg, levodopa 100 mg) = 65 mg levodopa; 50 mg levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone combination = 65 mg levodopa. Six age-matched healthy controls were also recruited. Table 1 summarizes the clinical features of all patients with PD and healthy controls.

Table 1
Study population

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents.

Approval for this study was obtained from the Research and Ethics Committee of the Hammersmith, Queen Charlotte, and Chelsea and Acton Hospitals Trust, London, UK, reference number 05/Q0406/69. Permission to administer [11C]SCH442416 was obtained from the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee (ARSAC), UK, reference number 262-336-22789. Signed informed consent was obtained from all participants, according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Funding was provided from the Parkinson's Disease Society.

Clinical assessment.

Disease duration, Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) staging, LED, and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were recorded as part of the clinical assessment of all subjects with PD. Examinations were performed when the patients were in an “off” condition after temporary withdrawal of their medication.

PET procedure.

PET scanning was performed at the Cyclotron Building, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK, using a Siemens ECAT EXACT HR+ scanner. This scanner has an axial view of 15.5 cm. Sixty-three transaxial image planes were acquired at 2.46-mm slices with a reconstruction axial resolution of 5.4 mm and a transaxial resolution of 5.6 mm.11 A 10-minute transmission scan was acquired before the emission study using a single rotating photon point source of 137Cs for subsequent attenuation and scatter correction. This was followed by the injection of an average of 612 MBq of [11C]SCH442416 over 10 seconds, 30 seconds after the start of a 90-minute dynamic emission scan (34 frames). All PET data were acquired in 3-dimensional mode, corrected for attenuation, detector efficiency, random events, and scatter, and reconstructed into tomographic images using filtered back-projection.

Prior to scanning, all subjects had radial arterial cannulation under local anesthesia. Continuous online sampling was performed for the first 15 minutes, with discrete blood samples taken at baseline, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 75, and 90 minutes. An aliquot of each discrete sample was rapidly centrifuged to obtain corresponding plasma and radioactivity concentrations that were measured in an NaI(TI) well counter for blood and plasma separately. The continuous blood counts were corrected using the plasma/blood ratio to derive a plasma input function. The plasma was further analyzed for radiolabeled metabolites using high-performance liquid chromatography and the plasma input function was corrected accordingly to produce a final parent radioligand input function to be used for quantification. A post hoc frame-by-frame realignment procedure was applied to compensate for head movement in the scanner. To reduce the influence of redistribution of radiotracer producing erroneous realignments,12 nonattenuation-corrected images were used. Nonattenuation-corrected images are considered to be more useful for the realignment algorithm because these images include a significant scalp and skull bone marrow signal compared with attenuation-corrected images. Frames were realigned to a single, reference frame acquired 40 minutes postinjection, which had a high signal-to-noise ratio, using a mutual information algorithm,13 and the transformation parameters were then applied to the corresponding attenuation-corrected dynamic images. The nonattenuation-corrected images were denoised using a level 2, order 64 Battle Lemarie wavelet filter.14

[11C]SCH442416 was manufactured and supplied by Hammersmith Immanet, GE Healthcare.

MRI procedure.

Each subject had a volumetric T1-weighted MRI performed with a Philips 1.5 T Eclipse system for the purpose of defining the cerebellum, caudate, putamen, and thalamus for sampling. The individual MRIs were coregistered to the PET-summed images using an automated multiresolution optimization procedure.15 The anatomic segmentations obtained were used to define the above regions of interest (ROIs). ROIs were then applied onto the dynamic PET image to obtain the average time-activity curves of radioactivity concentrations. These were then used for quantification.

PET quantification.

Spectral analysis together with the metabolite-corrected plasma input function was used to analyze the kinetic components of the regional time-activity curves.16,17 In brief, spectral analysis decomposes the regional time-activity course of the radioactivity concentration into separate kinetic components that are functions of the input function and of the tissue compartments with different residence times. It makes no a priori assumptions about the number and nature of kinetic compartments present. The regional total volume of distribution (VT) can be obtained by adding the spectral analysis components detected into a suitable kinetic range that encompasses the free tracer in tissue plus its binding, both nonspecific or specific to the A2A receptors.16,17 Finally, the measure of interest, which is the binding potential of the specifically bound radioligand relative to the nondisplaceable radioligand in tissue (BPND),18 is calculated from the volumes of distribution as follows:

equation image

The cerebellum (which is devoid of A2A receptors in humans) was used as a reference region and therefore VT cerebellum was used as an estimate of the free and nonspecific binding of [11C]SCH442416 throughout the brain. All preprocessing and quantification steps were performed using in-house routines written in Matlab 6.5 (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA).

Statistical analysis.

Clinical features of the PD groups (age, disease duration, LED, H&Y staging, and UPDRS score) were interrogated using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U testing. Regional group differences in BPND were also tested with the Mann-Whitney U statistic. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p = 0.05.

In order to investigate the possible confounding effects of between-group differences in disease severity, disease duration, and dose of dopaminergic treatment on regional BPND, we performed repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using age at scanning, disease duration, levodopa equivalent unit (LEU), UPDRS scores, and H&Y staging as covariates. Additionally, we checked the relationship between each of these parameters and [11C]SCH442416 BPND values by Spearman rho correlation studies. Spearman rho correlations were also performed to determine the relationship between dyskinesia severity, rated with the UPDRS, and regional [11C]SCH442416 BPND.

All statistical tests were performed using SPSS (v 16, SPSS Inc., IBM, Chicago, IL).


Subjects with LIDs had longer disease duration (p = 0.036), higher LED (p = 0.006), and higher H&Y staging (p = 0.005) than non-LID subjects. Mean UPDRS scores, however, did not differ between PD groups (p = 0.172) (table 1).

The regional cerebral [11C]SCH442416 BPND of all groups are detailed in table 2. The data revealed large increases in caudate and putamen mean BPND of the dyskinetic patients with PD compared with the nondyskinetic patients with PD and the control group (p < 0.05). Thalamic A2A binding was equivalent across all 3 groups. The figure shows [11C]SCH442416 summed images from a healthy subject, a patient with PD without dyskinesias, and a patient with PD with dyskinesias.

Table 2
11C]SCH442416 binding potential of the 3 groups investigated
Integrated images of [11C]SCH442416 binding

Repeated-measures ANCOVA using age at scanning, disease duration, LEU, UPDRS scores, and H&Y staging as covariates showed no contributions of these factors to the between-group differences in mean striatal BPND (p > 0.05).

Spearman rho nonparametric statistic found no correlation between striatal [11C]SCH442416 uptake and age (r = 0.081, p = 0.802), disease duration (r = 0.176, p = 0.584), LED (r = 0.350, p = 0.265), and UPDRS score (r = 0.158, p = 0.624). Additionally, we found no correlation between striatal [11C]SCH442416 uptake and dyskinesia severity as measured by UPDRS subscale IV (r = 0.081, p = 1).


In this study we demonstrated higher uptake of [11C]SCH442416 in the caudate and putamen of patients with more advanced PD with LIDs compared to earlier cases without LIDs and to healthy controls. No difference in striatal A2A binding was found between patients with PD without LIDs and healthy controls. In the human brain, the striatum contains one of the highest concentrations of A2A receptors.6,19,20 The increase in A2A receptor availability that we have detected in vivo mirrors the results of histopathologic studies where A2A receptor mRNA expression was shown to be elevated in brains of dyskinetic patients with PD5 and in dyskinetic animal lesion models of PD.19 The increased striatal [11C]SCH442416 binding observed in our dyskinetic patients is most likely to reflect adaptive changes to long-term exposure to levodopa, as observed in animal models of PD; however, we cannot exclude other possible explanations including low striatal adenosine levels resulting in increased A2A availability or a compensatory receptor upregulation.

Increased striatal A2A expression could result in the production of dyskinesias by inhibiting traffic through the indirect pathway to the external pallidum (GPe). The indirect pathway links the striatum with the globus pallidus interna (GPi)/substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNpr) complex via the external pallidum and subthalamic nucleus. The GPi then projects directly to the ventral thalamus with GABAergic output and has a final inhibitory effect on motor activity. Indirect striatal neurons projecting to GPe are GABAergic, as are the neurons projecting from the GPe to the subthalamic nucleus, while the STN to GPi projections are glutamatergic. The net effect of the indirect striatal output is, therefore, facilitatory on GPi and inhibitory on thalamocortical projections. Dopamine (D2) receptors are expressed by neurons in the indirect pathway, their stimulation being necessary for the activity of this system. In contrast, the direct pathway GABAergic connecting striatum to GPi inhibits this nucleus and so facilitates thalamocortical activity.

A2A receptors are found on the cell bodies of striatal indirect pathway neurons projecting to the GPe. They are found in conjunction with D2 receptors forming heteromers. Adenosine binding to heteromerized A2A receptors results in adenylyl-cyclase activation and an intramembrane receptor interaction with D2 receptors, antagonizing their activity.6,21 The overall effect of increased A2A agonism is thus thought to be an increase in striatal-GPe pathway activity and its inhibitory effect on thalamocortical pathways. This would be reversed by administration of A2A blockers. If our PET finding of increased striatal A2A availability in dyskinetic PD represents a reduction in endogenous adenosine levels occupying these sites then underactivity of the indirect pathway would follow, leading in turn to increased and potentially disorganized thalamocortical traffic.

A2A activation is also thought to be a requirement for dyskinesia priming mechanisms.22 In MPTP primate models of PD, animals that did not develop dyskinesias had lower levels of A2A receptor binding and gene expression compared to those animals that developed dyskinesias.

In our small cohort of dyskinetic patients, we did not find a correlation between striatal [11C]SCH442416 uptake and dyskinesia severity. However, we had limited power to detect such a correlation and confounds such as varying individual levodopa dosages and presynaptic dopamine storage capacities could have obscured such a relationship. Other neurotransmitter systems could also influence onset of dyskinesias. Preproenkephalin (PPE) is one such neuromodulator and increased PPE expression has been associated with the development of dyskinesia in MPTP monkeys.23 Interestingly, PPE mRNA expression in rat striatum is facilitated by A2A activation.5

Our dyskinetic subjects had a longer duration of PD, had more severe H&Y stage, and were taking higher doses of levodopa than the nondyskinetic cases. It could be argued that the clinical differences observed between PD groups rather than the presence of dyskinesias were responsible for the higher striatal [11C]SCH442416 uptake in the LIDs group. Analysis was thus done in an attempt to control for these confounding variables. Nonparametric statistics were used for univariate testing because of the small sample size, not for non-normality, as the sample size did not allow meaningful normality testing. To test for the effect of confounding, we sought the most powerful approach, the repeated-measures ANCOVA, where regions of interest are the repeated factor. The repeated-measures ANCOVA, similarly to the analysis of variance, is generally robust to non-normality and was preferred to the nonparametric alternative (Friedman 2-way analysis of variance) as the latter cannot handle covariates.

Repeated-measures ANCOVA using age at scanning, disease duration, LEU, and H&Y staging as covariates showed no effect of any of these factors on regional group differences in BPND. Additionally, no correlations between any of these clinical features and [11C]SCH442416-BDND were found. Finally, thalamic [11C]SCH442416 BDND was similar between all groups despite the differences in levodopa exposure. Taken together, these findings support, but do not prove, that the increase in striatal [11C]SCH442416 BDND observed in our dyskinetic patients is related to the presence of involuntary movements.

The study indicates that adenosine A2A sites are a potential pharmacologic target for the management of LIDs. Istradefylline and preladenant, 2 selective adenosine A2A antagonists, are currently being tested as potential symptomatic agents in PD. The results of the first clinical trials with istradefylline have recently become available.2428 While the drug has shown to improve “off” time in patients with advanced PD, it has not shown an antidyskinetic effect. In fact, when istradefylline was administered as an adjunct therapy to levodopa, it caused an increase in LIDs, which required a reduction of the levodopa dose, though this was not evident in MPTP-treated nonhuman primates.29,30 An increase in dyskinesias following adjunct istradefylline usage would fit with our hypothesis that raised striatal A2A binding reflects reduced adenosine agonism in our dyskinetic PD cases. If we are correct, adenosine agonists rather than antagonists would exhibit antidyskinetic activity.

Preladenant at the dose of 1 mg/kg inhibited levodopa-induced behavioral sensitization after repeated daily administration in rodent models of PD, suggesting a reduced risk of the development of dyskinesias.31 Long-term clinical trials are required to ascertain whether this antidyskinetic effect of preladenant is also present in patients with PD.

In this study, we demonstrated that patients with PD with LIDs have raised striatal A2A receptor availability, which did not correlate with age, disease duration, LEU, or H&Y staging. This suggests that A2A antagonists might have value for the management of LIDs along with reductions of levodopa dosage. [11C]SCH442416 PET provides a robust and reliable method for in vivo investigations of A2A availability. PET should enable dose-occupancy profiles of other A2A antagonists to be determined.


analysis of covariance
external pallidum
globus pallidus interna
Hoehn &Yahr
levodopa effective dose
levodopa equivalent unit
levodopa-induced dyskinesia
Parkinson disease
region of interest
substantia nigra pars reticulata
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.


Statistical analysis was conducted by Dr. Subrata Bose.


Dr. Ramlackhansingh and Dr. Bose report no disclosures. Dr. Ahmed has received research support from the Parkinsons UK. Dr. Pavese serves as a consultant for GE Healthcare. Dr. Turkheimer receives research support from The European Commission, 7th Framework Programme, Medical Research Council UK, The Royal Society, and EPSRC. Dr. Brooks has received funding for travel from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.; serves on the editorial boards of the Journal of Neural Transmission, Brain, and Synapse; is employed part-time by GE Healthcare; and receives research support from Medical Research Council UK.


1. Lo RY, Tanner CM, Alber KB, et al. Clinical features in early Parkinson disease and survival. Arch Neurol 2009;66:1353–1358 [PubMed]
2. Ahlskog EA, Muenter MD. Frequency of levodopa-related dyskinesias and motor fluctuations as estimated from the cumulative literature. Mov Disord 2001;16:448–458 [PubMed]
3. Marin C, Aguilar E, Mengod G, Cortés R, Obeso JA. Effects of early vs. late initiation of levodopa treatment in hemiparkinsonian rats. Eur J Neurosci 2009;30:823–832 [PubMed]
4. Sharma JC, Macnamara L, Hasoon M, Ross I. Cascade of levodopa dose and weight-related dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (LD-WD-PD cascade). Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2006;12:499–505 [PubMed]
5. Calon F, Dridi M, Hornykiewicz O, Bédard PJ, Rajput AH, DiPaolo T. Increased adenosine A2A receptors in the brain of Parkinson's disease patients with dyskinesias. Brain 2004;127:1075–1084 [PubMed]
6. Svenningsson P, LeMoine C, Fisone G, Fredholm BB. Distribution, biochemistry and function of striatal adenosine A2A receptors. Prog Neurobiol 1999;59:355–396 [PubMed]
7. Ding Y, Restrepo J, Won L, Hwang D-Y, Kim K-S, Kang UJ. Chronic 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine treatment induces dyskinesia in aphakia mice, a novel genetic model of Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis 2007;27:11–23 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Zeng B-Y, Pearce RKP, MacKenzie GM, Jenner P. Alterations in preproenkephalin and adenosine-2a receptor mRNA, but not preprotachykinin mRNA correlate with occurrence of dyskinesia in normal monkeys treated with L-DOPA. Eur J Neurosci 2000;12:1096–1104 [PubMed]
9. Moresco RM, Todde S, Belloli S, et al. In vivo imaging of adenosine A2A receptors in rat primate using [11C]SCH442416. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:405–413 [PubMed]
10. Todde S, Moresco RM, Simonelli P, et al. Design, radiosynthesis, and biodistribution of a new potent and selective ligand for in vivo imaging of the adenosine A2A receptor system using positron emission tomography. J Med Chem 2000;43:4359–4362 [PubMed]
11. Brix G, Zaers J, Adam LE, et al. Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol: National Electrical Manufacturers Association. J Nucl Med 1997;38:1614–1623 [PubMed]
12. Dagher A, Gunn R, Lockwood G, Cunningham V, Grasby P, Brooks DJ. Measuring neurotransmitter release with PET: methodological issues. In: Carson P, Daube-Witherspoon M, editors. eds. Quantitative Functional Brain Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998:449–454
13. Studholme C, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ. Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. Med Phys 1997;24:25–35 [PubMed]
14. Turkheimer FE, Brett M, Visvikis D, Cunningham VJ. Multiresolution analysis of emission tomography images in the wavelet domain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:1189–1208 [PubMed]
15. Heckemann RA, Hajnal JV, Aljabar P, Rueckert D, Hammers A. Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage 2006;33:115–126 [PubMed]
16. Cunningham VJ, Jones T. Spectral analysis of dynamic PET studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993;13:15–23 [PubMed]
17. Turkheimer FE, Moresco RM, Lucignani G, Sokoloff L, Fazio F, Schmidt K. The use of spectral analysis to determine regional cerebral glucose utilization with positron emission tomography and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose: theory, implementation, and optimization procedures. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994;14:406–422 [PubMed]
18. Innis RB, Cunningham V, Delforge J, et al. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007;27:533–539
19. Jenner P, Mori A, Hauser R, Morelli M, Fredholm BB, Chen JF. Adenosine, adenosine A2A antagonists, and Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2009;15:406–413 [PubMed]
20. Svenningsson P, Hall H, Sedvall G, Fredholm BB. Distribution of adenosine receptors in the post mortem human brain: an extended autoradiographic study. Synapse 1997;27:322–335 [PubMed]
21. Ferre S, Quiroz C, Woods AS, et al. An update on adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor interactions: implications for the function of G protein-coupled receptors. Curr Pharm Des 2008;14:1468–1474 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Brotchie J. Nondopaminergic mechanisms in levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Mov Disord 2005;20:919–931 [PubMed]
23. Calon F, Birdi S, Rajput AH, Hornykiewicz O, Bedard PJ, DiPaolo T. Increase of preproenkephalin mRNA levels in the putamen of Parkinson disease patients with levo-dopa induced dyskinesia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002;61:186–196 [PubMed]
24. LeWitt PA, Guttman M, Tetrud JW, et al. Adenosine A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline (KW-6002) reduces “off” time in Parkinson's disease: a double-bind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial (6002-US-005). Ann Neurol 2008;63:295–302 [PubMed]
25. Hauser RA, Hubble JP, Truong DD. Randomized trial of the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist istradefylline in advanced PD. Neurology 2003;61:297–303 [PubMed]
26. Mizuno Y, Hasegawa K, Kondo T, Kuno S, Yamamoto M. Clinical efficacy of istradefylline (KW-6002) in Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled study. Mov Disord 2010;25:1437–1443 [PubMed]
27. Factor S, Mark MH, Watts R, et al. A long-term study of istradefylline in subjects with fluctuating Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disorder 2010;16:423–426
28. Fernandez HH, Greeley DR, Zweig RM, et al. Istradefylline as monotherapy for Parkinson disease: results of the 6002-US-051 trial. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2010;16:16–20 [PubMed]
29. Kanda T, Tashiro T, Kuwana Y, Jenner P. Adenosine A2A receptors modify motor function in MPTP-treated common marmosets. Neuroreport 1998;9:2857–2860 [PubMed]
30. Jenner P. Istradefylline, a novel adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2005;14:729–738
31. Hodgson RA, Bertorelli R, Varty GB, et al. Characterization of the potent and highly selective A2A receptor antagonists preladenant and SCH 412348 [7-[2-[4-2, 4-difluorophenyl]-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-2-(2-furanyl)-7H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-5-amine] in rodent models of movement disorders and depression. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2009;330:294–303 [PubMed]

Articles from Neurology are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Neurology