PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
 
Nat Commun. Feb 8, 2011; 2: 187.
PMCID: PMC3096875
NIHMSID: NIHMS291533
Chromatin remodelling complex dosage modulates transcription factor function in heart development
Jun K. Takeuchi,1,2,15 Xin Lou,3,15 Jeffrey M. Alexander,1,4 Hiroe Sugizaki,2 Paul Delgado-Olguín,1 Alisha K. Holloway,1 Alessandro D. Mori,1 John N. Wylie,1 Chantilly Munson,5,6 Yonghong Zhu,3 Yu-Qing Zhou,7 Ru-Fang Yeh,8 R. Mark Henkelman,7,9 Richard P. Harvey,10,11 Daniel Metzger,12 Pierre Chambon,12 Didier Y. R. Stainier,4,5,6 Katherine S. Pollard,1,8 Ian C. Scott,3,13 and Benoit G. Bruneaua1,4,5,14
1Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
2Cardiovascular Regeneration, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, and Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Sciences, The University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, JST PRESTO, Japan.
3Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada.
4Programs in Biomedical Sciences and Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
5Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
6Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
7The Mouse Imaging Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada.
8Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94107, USA.
9Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
10Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Sydney 2010, Australia.
11Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2052, Australia.
12Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Université de Strasbourg, 1 rue Laurent Fries, Illkirch 67404, France.
13Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
14Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
15These authors contributed equally to this work.
abbruneau/at/gladstone.ucsf.edu
Received August 5, 2010; Accepted January 11, 2011.
Dominant mutations in cardiac transcription factor genes cause human inherited congenital heart defects (CHDs); however, their molecular basis is not understood. Interactions between transcription factors and the Brg1/Brm-associated factor (BAF) chromatin remodelling complex suggest potential mechanisms; however, the role of BAF complexes in cardiogenesis is not known. In this study, we show that dosage of Brg1 is critical for mouse and zebrafish cardiogenesis. Disrupting the balance between Brg1 and disease-causing cardiac transcription factors, including Tbx5, Tbx20 and Nkx2–5, causes severe cardiac anomalies, revealing an essential allelic balance between Brg1 and these cardiac transcription factor genes. This suggests that the relative levels of transcription factors and BAF complexes are important for heart development, which is supported by reduced occupancy of Brg1 at cardiac gene promoters in Tbx5 haploinsufficient hearts. Our results reveal complex dosage-sensitive interdependence between transcription factors and BAF complexes, providing a potential mechanism underlying transcription factor haploinsufficiency, with implications for multigenic inheritance of CHDs.
The transcriptional regulation of organogenesis has been well studied, and in the developing heart, combinatorial interactions between transcription factors are key to robust gene regulation1,2. Importantly, disease-causing mutations in several cardiac transcription factors are the underlying cause of human congenital heart defects (CHDs)2,3. Most of these mutations are predicted to cause haploinsufficiency; however, the mechanistic basis for the aberrant gene expression that results from reduced transcription factor dosage is not known.
Mutations in cardiac transcription factor genes, such as TBX5, NKX2–5 and GATA4, all cause dominant inherited human CHD. These factors physically interact with each other, providing an effective mechanism for specific target activation and a potential explanation for their common disease-related haploinsufficiency4,5,6. Tbx5, Nkx2–5 and Gata4 also interact with the Swi/Snf-like Brg1/Brm-associated factors (BAF) chromatin remodelling complexes, in part via Baf60c, a cardiac-enriched subunit of the BAF complexes7. This interaction is key for the de novo induction of cardiac differentiation from embryonic mesoderm8, and depletion of Baf60c function leads to impaired heart development7.
Identification of Baf60c and other BAF complex subunits that co-assemble to form cell-type-specific complexes has revealed the importance of BAF complexes as instructive factors in differentiation, rather than simply as chromatin-unwinding machines7,9,10,11. These specific BAF complexes perform discrete functions related to lineage specification and precursor differentiation. However, little is known about dosage sensitivity of tissue-specific BAF complexes or their links to DNA-binding transcription factors that are involved in similar processes.
Mammalian BAF complexes include one of the two ATPases, Brm or Brg1 (ref. 10). Brm is dispensible for development, whereas Brg1 (also known as Smarca4) is absolutely essential for broad aspects of development in early mouse embryogenesis12,13. Thus, disrupting the function of Brg1 provides insights into the global function of BAF complexes during development. In the present study, we examined the role of Brg1 in heart development in mouse and zebrafish and tested its potential role in modulating the function of disease-related cardiac transcription factors. Our results reveal a dosage-sensitive interdependence between transcription factors and BAF complexes that modulates several aspects of heart formation. We conclude that the disruption of a delicate balance between CHD-causing transcription factors and BAF complexes is likely to be a mechanistic cause of CHDs because of transcription factor haploinsufficiency.
Brg1 is critical for mouse heart development
To assess the importance of Brg1 in the developing mammalian heart, we deleted Brg1 in developing ventricular myocytes, with a loxP-flanked Brg1 allele (referred to here as Brg1f)14 and Nkx2.5::Cre, which is expressed mainly in ventricular myocytes from E8.5 onwards, with rare sporadic activity in endocardial cells15,16 (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1). This Brg1 deletion led to highly variable defects in heart formation (Fig. 1b,c), perhaps partly because of variable and incomplete activity of the Cre-expressing transgene (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1). Most embryos did not survive past E10.5; however, a few (two pups from over ten litters) Nkx2.5::Cre;Brg1f/f mice were born alive. Severely affected embryos had a loss of normal ventricular chamber morphology (Fig. 1b), whereas the least severely affected, which survived to birth, had dilated disorganized ventricles, ventricular septation defects and a double outlet right ventricle (Fig. 1c). Most embryos had reduced chamber size and impaired looping (Fig. 1d). Expression of several cardiac genes was defective in Nkx2.5::Cre;Brg1f/f embryos (Fig. 1d), including Nppa (a marker of chamber myocardium), Tbx5 (a transcription factor that regulates Nppa) and the trabecular growth factor Bmp10. Reduced Bmp10 expression has also been shown in the deletion of Brg1 using Sm22a::Cre, and has been determined to be a critical downstream effector of Brg1-dependent gene regulation17. Our deletion using Nkx2.5::Cre, although variable in its effect, uncovers a broader Brg1-dependent programme of gene expression than that observed with Sm22a::Cre, most likely because of the earlier expression of Nkx2.5::Cre. Other cardiac genes, such as Nkx2–5 and Actc1, were expressed normally (Fig. 1d), indicating deregulation of a specific programme in Nkx2–5::Cre;Brg1f/f hearts.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Brg1 is required for early mouse heart formation.
We conclude that Brg1 regulates specific programmes of gene expression in the developing heart that are critical for differentiation of cardiac myocytes and cardiac morphogenesis.
Brg1 is critical for zebrafish heart development
The BAF complex is conserved throughout evolution10. Zebrafishes have a single BAF complex ATPase, brg1. young, a loss-of-function mutation of brg1 (refs 18, 19), results in defects in retinal neurogenesis and pericardial oedema, which often indicates a defective heart function. We isolated a new mutation in brg1, brg1s481, which is predicted to be a null allele (Supplementary Fig. S2); this mutation creates a premature stop codon, predicting a truncation at amino-acid residue 252 (of 1,627), deleting all functional domains including the ATPase/SNF2 domain and the bromodomains. This mutation fails to complement the published yng allele18,19 and is phenocopied by morpholino oligonucleotide (MO) treatment (see below), consistent with a null allele. These mutants formed a heart; however, after 48 h of development, the heart became hypoplastic and had severe arrhythmias with sporadic arrests in contraction (Fig. 2a,b; Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). The survival of brg1 mutant embryos to a late stage is likely related to the presence of maternal brg1 transcripts19. To knock down brg1 in other transgenic lines, translation-inhibiting MOs20 were injected. Knockdown of brg1 by MO does not alter endocardial differentiation, and vascular development occurred normally (Supplementary Fig. S3). However, the heart chamber displayed severe stenosis (Fig. 2c,d). Co-injection of an MO targeting p53 was used to investigate a role for cell death in the brg1 cardiac phenotype21. Injection of p53 MO into brg1 mutant embryos resulted in an identical cardiac phenotype to that observed in uninjected mutant siblings (Supplementary Fig. S3). Gene expression analysis (Fig. 2e) demonstrated that, although differentiation of both heart chambers occurred properly, brg1s481 zebrafish had lost the regionalization of nppa expression, which marks 'working' myocardium in fish and mice22; this is reminiscent of the loss of Brg1 in the mouse. Expression of atrioventricular canal-specific genes, including bmp4, tbx2b and notch1b, was abnormal in brg1s481 embryos, suggesting patterning abnormalities in brg1 mutant zebrafish embryos. Expression of the Na+/Ca++ exchanger (Ncx) was elevated in brg1s481 embryos, which could explain contractility defects in brg1s481 embryos23,24. We conclude that, in zebrafish, as in the mouse, brg1 is required for a specific programme essential for cardiac morphogenesis and patterning.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Loss of Brg1 leads to heart development defects in the zebrafish embryos.
To uncover the cellular mechanisms underlying loss of brg1 in zebrafish, cardiomyocyte migration, proliferation and shape were analysed. During cardiac cone tilting, an early event in the formation of the zebrafish heart tube, atrial myocardium undergoes left-directed anterior migration25 (Fig. 3a–c; Supplementary Movie 2). In brg1 morphants, anterior cardiomyocytes, especially those on the right side of the heart, displayed randomized trajectories (Fig. 3d–f; Supplementary Movie 3), resulting in the failure of proper heart jogging, which is indispensable for subsequent heart looping and chamber formation. We monitored the growth of the heart by counting the number of cardiomyocytes at different time points (Fig. 3g–n). At early stages, cell numbers between control and brg1 morphants were comparable (at 28 hpf, 166±12 (n=4) cardiomyocytes in wild type (WT) hearts versus 145±14 in brg1 morphants (n=5)). As development proceeded, however, growth in myocardial cell number obviously lagged in brg1 morphants and appeared to halt by 48 hpf (251±13 (n=6) in WT hearts versus 173±14 in brg1 morphants (n=4); Fig. 3o; Supplementary Movies 4 and 5).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Defective cardiomyocyte migration and cell shape in zebrafish brg1 mutants.
During zebrafish heart development, confined myocardial cell-shape changes are a key parameter in cardiac morphogenesis22. In WT embryos, outer curvature cardiomyocytes became flattened and elongated and were aligned relative to each other (Fig. 3p; Supplementary Movie 6). In brg1s481 embryos, cardiomyocytes had a cuboidal shape throughout the heart (Fig. 3q; Supplementary Movie 7). Because of the altered and variable cell shape, it is difficult to assess cell size, and thus we have not quantified this parameter; however, cell size did not appear to be grossly altered. As the changes in cell shape require a balance between extrinsic (blood flow) and intrinsic (contractility) biomechanical forces22, we examined the circulation in brg1s481 embryo (Supplementary Movie 8). The circulation in mutant embryos was slower than that in WT embryos at 36 hpf, but still robust, suggesting that reduced circulation did not cause the abnormal myocyte shapes. Rather, the cell-shape changes in brg1 mutants may reflect either an intrinsic defect in myocardial morphogenesis and/or be secondary to abnormal heart contractility.
CHDs in Brg1 haploinsufficient mice
The defects upon cardiac-specific deletion of Brg1 and the phenotype of brg1 zebrafish show that Brg1 is critical for specific aspects of cardiac gene expression. As Brg1+/− mice are underrepresented after birth13, we hypothesized that the partially penetrant lethality in Brg1+/− mice might be due to CHDs. We found that 50% of Brg1+/− mice died before 3 weeks of age (compared with 0% in WT controls), and in neonatal mice (n=10) we found CHDs such as dilated hearts (5/10), muscular ventricular septal defects (2/10) and incomplete closure of the atrial septum (4/10), a condition known as patent foramen ovale (Fig. 4a). Specific heterozygous deletion of Brg1 in ventricular myocytes (with Nkx2.5::Cre) and cardiac precursors (with Mef2cAHF::Cre26) also led to CHDs, indicating that these are not due to nonspecific effects of loss of Brg1 outside the heart (Supplementary Fig. S4). The lack of severe defects in Nkx2.5::Cre;Brg1fl/+ mice (in which heterozygous loss of Brg1 is only in ventricular myocytes) indicate that the defects in Brg1+/− mice are likely to result from combined defects in multiple cardiac cell types. Brg1+/− mice that survived the neonatal period had structurally normal hearts, but we also identified specific abnormalities in heart function in adult Brg1+/− mice, as determined by high-frequency ultrasound and electrical function (Fig. 4b–d). Haemodynamic anomalies consisted of predominantly impaired cardiac relaxation, as determined primarily by a decrease in E-wave amplitude (Fig. 4b,d). Defects in cardiac electrical function were also found in surviving Brg1+/− mice by telemetry electrocardiogram (ECG), which included atrioventricular block, mild prolongation of the QRS complex (indicative of slowed conduction) and occasional sinus node dysfunction (resulting in an irregular heart beat; Fig. 4b–d). We conclude that Brg1 haploinsufficiency predisposes mice to CHDs and abnormal heart function. This important result identifies a dosage requirement for BAF complexes in specific aspects of cardiac morphogenesis and functional maturation, and suggests a potential mechanistic link to disease-causing mutations in human CHD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CHDs in Brg1 heterozygous null mice.
Brg1 genetically interacts with transcription factor genes
The morphological and physiological heart defects in Brg1+/− mice are reminiscent of those in Tbx5 haploinsufficient mice4,27,28. We hypothesized that Brg1 might be a critical determinant of the dosage sensitivity of Tbx5. To look for a genetic interaction between Tbx5 and Brg1, we generated mice heterozygous for both Tbx5 and Brg1 (Brg1+/−;Tbx5del/+ mice). Compared with Brg1+/− or Tbx5del/+ mice, which had normal heart morphologies at E12.5, all Brg1+/−;Tbx5del/+ mice (n=6) had severe defects in heart formation at this stage, including hypoplastic left ventricle and dilated atria (Fig. 5a,b). Although Brg1+/−;Tbx5del/+ hearts appeared relatively normal at E11.5, this genetic interaction was evident at the level of Nppa gene expression at E9.5, which was expressed at normal levels in Brg1+/− mice, at slightly reduced levels in Tbx5del/+ mice, but was undetectable in Brg1+/−;Tbx5del/+ mice (Fig. 5a). Trivial explanations might be that, in Brg1+/−;Tbx5del/+ mice, the expression of Tbx5 is much lower than in Tbx5del/+ or Brg1+/− mice or that expression of its interacting partners (Nkx2–5, Gata4) is lower, predisposing the mice to more severe CHDs; this mechanism was discounted by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and microarray analysis that showed similar levels of Tbx5, Nkx2–5 and Gata4 messenger RNA (mRNA) in Brg1+/− and Brg1+/−;Tbx5del/+ hearts at E11.5 (Supplementary Fig. S5 and Supplementary Data 1).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Genetic interactions between Brg1 and cardiac transcription factor genes.
In zebrafish, mutation of tbx5 in the heartstrings mutant29 leads to defects in heart looping and progressive deterioration of the heart. The similarity between tbx5 and brg1 mutants in the fish raised the possibility that genetic interactions between these two genes may exist also in zebrafish. We performed double knockdown of brg1 and tbx5 via MOs. When 1 ng brg1 or tbx5 morpholino was injected, the heart developed normally in all cases (Fig. 5c). In contrast, co-injection of brg1 and tbx5 morpholino (1 ng each) resulted in 52% of embryos displaying a severe heartstrings-like phenotype and 44% of embryos having a milder unlooped, tube-like heart phenotype (n=120; Fig. 5c), demonstrating a clear and conserved genetic interaction between brg1 and tbx5.
We utilized the variable dose dependency of other critical cardiac transcription factors in the mouse to test further genetic interactions with Brg1. Although Tbx5 haploinsuffiency in the mouse mimics CHDs in humans4, Nkx2–5 heterozygous mice display only very mild aspects of CHDs caused by human NKX2–5 mutations30,31, and Tbx20 haploinsufficiency does not result in any detectable heart defects32. We generated compound heterozygous mice for Brg1 and for either Tbx5, Nkx2–5 or Tbx20; all mouse mutations are loss-of-function alleles with no known dominant activity. In all three cases, dramatic and specific defects in heart formation were observed in all compound heterozygous mice (n=4–8) at E12.5 (Fig. 5d), and no compound heterozygous mice survived past E14.5. Defects included severe loss of cardiac cushion formation (Tbx5+/−;Brg1+/− and Brg1+/−;Nkx2–5+/−), thinned atrial walls (Tbx5+/−;Brg1+/−, Tbx20+/−;Brg1+/−), hypoplastic ventricles (Tbx5+/−;Brg1+/−, Nkx2–5+/−;Brg1+/−) and thinned ventricular walls (Nkx2–5+/−;Brg1+/−, Tbx20+/−;Brg1+/−). gata5 mutant fishes also have heart defects33, and mouse Gata4, the functional homologue of zebrafish gata5, interacts with BAF complexes7,8; we also observed an interaction of brg1 and gata5 low-dose MOs, supporting a more general importance of dose-dependent interactions between Brg1 and cardiac transcription factors (Supplementary Fig. S2).
These strong genetic interactions between Brg1 and cardiac transcription factor genes in mouse and zebrafish demonstrate a finely regulated interdependency between cardiac DNA-binding transcription factors and BAF chromatin remodelling complexes.
Programmes regulated by Brg1 and cardiac transcription factors
The genetic interaction between Brg1 and cardiac transcription factor genes could be a result of a genetic programme common to all transcription factors that is sensitive to Brg1 levels or, alternatively, Brg1 may potentiate each transcription factor's specific genetic programme. To address this question, we performed transcriptional profiling of E11.5 hearts from mice heterozygous for deletions of Brg1, Tbx5 or Nkx2–5, and mice that were compound heterozygotes for Brg1 and each transcription factor gene. We observed varying degrees of overlap between the sets of genes that were altered by decreased dosages of Brg1, Tbx5 and Nkx2–5, indicating some specificity to the programmes that are regulated by these factors (Fig. 5e and Supplemental Data 1, and quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) validation in Supplementary Fig. S5). Clustering analysis defined specific groups of genetic interactions (Fig. 6a,b), indicating considerable complexity to the genetic interactions between Nkx2–5 or Tbx5 and Brg1. For example, some genes were altered mostly in compound heterozygous hearts (clusters a, m, g, t). These genes are more resistant to an imbalance between Brg1 and the DNA-binding factors, but still rely on the balance of Brg1 and Tbx5 or Nkx2–5 for their normal regulation. Imbalance in the expression of these sets of genes is likely to be key for the compound heterozygous phenotype observed between Brg1 and Tbx5 or Nkx2–5.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Clustering analysis of altered gene expression.
Perhaps more surprisingly, many genes that were altered in single heterozygous (Nkx2–5lacZ/+, Brg1+/− or Tbx5del/+) hearts compared with WT hearts were not significantly altered in compound heterozygous (Nkx2–5lacZ/+;Brg1+/− or Tbx5del/+;Brg1+/−) hearts (clusters d, e, l, n, o and u in Fig. 6a,b). One possible interpretation of this striking interaction is that the relative levels of Nkx2–5 (or Tbx5) and Brg1 need to be maintained for normal expression of this set of genes, and that loss of one allele of either Nkx2–5 or Brg1 in single heterozygotes upsets this balance, leading to an allelic ratio of 2:1 or 1:2; however, in Nkx2–5lacZ/+;Brg1+/− hearts the balance is restored (a 1:1 allelic ratio). This implies that the relative levels between the DNA-binding factors (Tbx5 and Nkx2–5) and Brg1 is critical for a large set of genes.
The types of genes identified in the transcriptional profiling assays were from a wide range of functional classes, as exemplified from statistical exploration of Gene Ontology classifications that revealed broad classes of transcripts enriched in specific clusters (Fig. 6). Several genes important for heart development were identified in the different clusters of differentially regulated genes, including several previously identified as altered in Nkx2–5- or Tbx5-deficient hearts31,34,35. One particular novel set of transcripts was of interest: in Nkx2–5lacZ/+ and Brg1+/− hearts, we measured a clear increase in expression of several genes associated with the haematopoietic programme, including key regulators of this programme such as Gata1, Klf1 and Tal1. This implies that Nkx2–5/Brg1 suppresses haematopoietic differentiation in the embryonic heart.
It is difficult to precisely link the contribution of the different genetic programmes regulated by individual factor dosage and combinatorial dosage to the heart defects in each genetic modification, especially with only one snapshot in developmental time. Furthermore, many of the affected transcripts are likely to be due to indirect effects. However, it is clear that overlapping programmes are sensitive to the dosage of Brg1 and the cardiac transcription factor genes.
Reduced promoter occupancy by Brg1 in mutant hearts
Genetic interactions between Brg1 and cardiac transcription factors may reflect a direct physical interaction that is sensitive to the dosage of each factor, in one or multiple cell types, as well as interactions between various cell types in which one factor is haploinsufficient, and another cell type in which the interacting factor is haploinsufficient. To address the former possibility, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) for Brg1 on E9.5 hearts from WT, Tbx5del/+, Brg1+/− and Tbx5del/+;Brg1+/− embryos at the cardiomyocyte-specific Nppa and Gja5 promoters (Fig. 7a). We found that at the Nppa gene, Brg1 occupancy was reduced in Brg1+/− hearts, consistent with a limiting amount of Brg1, and that at both Nppa and Gja5, Brg1 occupancy was reduced in Tbx5del/+ hearts, indicating that reduced levels of Tbx5 directly result in reduced occupancy of Brg1 (Fig. 7b). Brg1 occupancy on both promoters was further reduced in Tbx5del/+;Brg1+/− embryos, suggesting that the interdependency of Tbx5 and Brg1 is partly compensated by interactions with other factors, perhaps other transcription factors that can interact with BAF complexes. These results provide a mechanism for some of the dosage-related relationships between Tbx5 and Brg1 on Tbx5 target genes, and support the notion that at least some of the effects of the genetic interaction between Tbx5 and Brg1 reflect cell-autonomous direct interactions.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Direct interactions between Brg1 and cardiac transcription factors.
Brg1-dependent transcriptional activation in vitro
We investigated whether transcriptional activation of cardiac genes directly requires the function of Brg1. We previously showed that Tbx5, Nkx2–5, Gata4 and the BAF complex subunit Baf60c can activate cardiac gene expression in non-cardiac mesoderm8. We found that co-transfection of NIH3T3 fibroblasts with Tbx5, Nkx2–5 and Gata4 expression constructs could robustly induce de novo the cardiac-specific gene Nppa, a marker of differentiated cardiomyocytes, the promoter of which is well characterized as a target of these transcription factors (Fig. 7c) (refs 4, 36). As Baf60c is expressed in NIH3T3 fibroblasts, exogenous Baf60c did not enhance the effect (data not shown). Other cardiac genes examined were not induced by this combination of factors. To determine the requirement for Brg1 in the de novo activation of Nppa, we depleted Brg1 with endoribonuclease prepared small interfering RNAs (esiRNAs)37. esiRNAs directed against Brg1 resulted in an ~50% decrease in Brg1 protein level (Fig. 7d). Decreased levels of Brg1 completely prevented Nppa activation by cardiac transcription factors (Fig. 7e,f), suggesting that this transcriptional activation is dependent on limiting amounts of functional Brg1-containing BAF complexes.
We demonstrated a critical, conserved and dosage-sensitive role for the BAF chromatin remodelling complex ATPase Brg1 in vertebrate heart development. Our results further show an important interdependency between BAF complexes and disease-related cardiac transcription factors, which suggests a mechanism for CHDs caused by mutations in these transcription factor genes and implications for multigenic inheritance of CHDs.
In mouse and zebrafish, Brg1 is required for important and specific aspects of heart development. In particular, chamber morphogenesis is disrupted in both mice and fish lacking Brg1, and proliferation of cardiac progenitors is reduced. A key subset of cardiac genes was affected by the loss of Brg1, consistent with specific roles for BAF complexes in differentiation of other cell types9,14,19,38,39,40,41,42. In many of these cases, Brg1 is required for differentiation after specification. Our results support a clear role for Brg1 in cardiac differentiation. As the function of Gata4, Nkx2–5 and Tbx5 relies on BAF complexes, in part via Baf60c7,8, loss of Brg1 likely affects target genes primarily by reducing the activation potential of cardiac transcription factors. Loss of brg1 in zebrafish demonstrates a strikingly conserved role for BAF complexes in vertebrate cardiac development. The morphogenetic and gene expression defects in brg1 mutant fish closely resemble that seen in mice lacking Brg1, suggesting that the gene networks regulated by BAF complexes are well conserved in vertebrate evolution.
Notably, mice heterozygous for a deletion of Brg1 have heart defects. This important finding indicates that Brg1 is haploinsufficient in the heart. Haploinsufficiency of Brg1 has been reported in the brain13 and immune system43, indicating that certain cell types are sensitive to the dosage of Brg1. The important dose dependency of Brg1 function in cardiogenesis shows that, as for DNA-binding transcription factors, normal formation of the heart relies on precise levels of functional BAF complexes. Furthermore, the genetic interaction between Brg1 and several cardiac transcription factor genes shows that transcription factor function is intimately linked to levels of Brg1. The resulting CHDs are likely to reflect these interactions in multiple cell types. Our promoter occupancy data indicate that, for at least a portion of co-regulated genes, a direct cell-autonomous dosage-related interaction exists. Specific genetic programmes are sensitive to the dosage of each transcription factor, and there is considerable complexity in the genomic regulation of gene expression by Brg1 and cardiac transcription factors. In some cases, a clear interrelationship exists between the dosage effects of either factor, resulting in a more profound effect in embryos haploinsufficient for Brg1 and Nkx2–5 or Tbx5. In other words, diminution of levels of one factor will reduce that factor's chance of interaction with BAF complexes, and this can be accentuated when Brg1 levels are also lower. Our molecular data support a model (Fig. 8, model a) for direct interactions between Brg1 and cardiac transcription factors, and imply that reduced recruitment of BAF complexes may be a significant molecular mechanism underlying transcription factor haploinsufficiency in congenital heart disease.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Models for the interaction between DNA-binding transcription factors and Brg1.
The observation that expression levels of several transcripts that are altered in heart heterozygous for a null allele of Nkx2–5, Tbx5 or Brg1 are restored to normal or near-normal levels in Nkx2–5lacz/+;Brg1+/− or Tbx5lacz/+;Brg1+/− compound heterozygous hearts indicates that for some genes, the relative allelic balance of Nkx2–5 (or Tbx5) and Brg1 may be more important than their absolute levels. The mechanism underlying this dosage interdependence is not known, but may include increased potential for interaction with other proteins that would alter the functional output on target genes (Fig. 8, model b). Thus, haploinsufficiency of cardiac transcription factors in CHDs is predicted to result in an imbalance between transcription factors and BAF complexes, likely resulting in impaired transcriptional activation at loci sensitive to this balance. The reason for distinct dosage-sensitive responses from one group of genes to the next is not known, but perhaps the chromatin status of some genes requires different dosage-related interactions between BAF complexes and DNA-binding transcription factors.
We cannot discern which specific group of genes, between those that respond more in the compound heterozygotes, those that return to WT levels in compound versus single heterozygotes, or combinations thereof, is responsible for the phenotypic output of transcription factor or Brg1 haploinsufficiency. It is likely that deregulation of many different genes in various functional classes would be responsible for the complex altered morphology and function that we observe.
In conclusion, we demonstrated a critical requirement for Brg1 in the development of the vertebrate heart, and importantly showed that there exists a fine balance between Brg1 levels and those of cardiac transcription factors that have been implicated in human CHD. The genetic interactions between Brg1 and cardiac transcription factor genes predict that, in the developing heart, maintaining relative levels of BAF complexes and transcription factors is critical for the timely and precise activation of groups of genes during development. In human congenital heart disease, disruption of these dosage-sensitive interactions would predict the impaired activation of specific gene networks that are essential for specific aspects of cardiac morphogenesis and function. We propose that an imbalance in this relationship is a molecular basis underlying CHDs caused by mutations in cardiac transcription factors. Although such a finely regulated interrelationship is perhaps more prone to disruption, it confers significant advantages in the fine quantitative regulation of transcript levels, which is an essential component of complex morphogenesis. These results further underscore the potential for multigenic effects on dominant mutations, and suggest that polymorphisms in BAF complex subunit genes, including but not restricted to Brg1, may modulate the penetration and phenotypic consequence of disease-causing mutations in transcription factor genes in human populations.
Mouse strains and embryology
The following mouse strains were used: Brg1L2/+,14, Nkx2–5::Cre15, Mef2cAHF::Cre26, Tbx5del/+,4, Nkx2–5lacZ/+,35, Tbx20+/−32, Z/EG44 and RYR45. Brg1+/− mice were generated by crossing Brg1L2/− mice with EIIa-Cre mice46. For all experimental analyses, at least three embryos per genotype were examined. All animal experiments were conducted following guidelines established and approved by the UCSF Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and in accordance with best practices outlined by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and licensed by Lab Animal Services at the Hospital for Sick Children.
Analysis of protein and mRNA expression
Immunostaining and in situ hybridization procedures were carried out by standard protocols. For immunostaining, cryosections were incubated with primary antisera against enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP; Abcam ab13970, 1:300) and with alpha-tropomyosin (CH1 monoclonal, Hybridoma bank, 1:50), followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488-coupled goat-anti-chicken immunoglobulin (Ig) G (Invitrogen A11039, 1:200) and Alexa Fluor 594-coupled goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen A110320), and were mounted with Prolong gold with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Invitrogen), to stain nuclei. In situ hybridization by whole mount or on 10 μm paraffin sections was performed using previously described protocols47. RNA probes were labelled with digoxigenin-labelled UTP, hybridized to samples and after washes were incubated with alkaline phosphatase-coupled anti-digoxigenin antisera (Roche); colorimetric detection was carried out by incubation with BM purple (Roche). Optical projection tomography (OPT) was performed as described7 using embryos labelled for alpha-cardiac actin (Actc) by fluorescent in situ hybrization (using the TSA amplification system, Amersham). OPT images were acquired in the GFP channel for tissue autofluorescence, and in the red channel for Actc fluorescence. Three-dimensional reconstructions were analysed and rendered in Amira 4.0 (Visage Imaging). QRT-PCR was performed with Taqman probe sets (Supplementary Table S1).
Cardiac physiology
Cardiac function was assessed by high-frequency ultrasound and telemetry ECG4,27. For ultrasound assessment of cardiac function, a high-frequency ultrasound imaging system (Vevo 660, VisualSonics) with a 30 MHz transducer was used for in vivo evaluation of cardiac morphology and function as previously described in detail27 Mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane at 1.5% by face mask, and body temperature was maintained at ~37 °C. An M-mode recording of the left ventricle was made in long-axis view and analysed for wall thickness and chamber dimension. Fractional shortening was also calculated as a measure of left ventricular systolic function. Mitral Doppler flow spectrum was recorded in apical four-chamber view, with the Doppler sample volume placed at the centre of mitral orifice and at the tip level of the valves for the highest velocities. The peak velocities of the early ventricular filling wave (E wave) and the late ventricular filling wave caused by atrial contraction (A wave) were measured, and their ratio was calculated. The left ventricular systolic and diastolic time intervals were also measured, including the isovolumic relaxation time, ventricular diastolic filling time, isovolumic contraction time and ventricular ejection time. All parameters were averaged for three cardiac cycles.
For ECG telemetry, telemetry devices (DSI) were implanted subcutaneously dorsally under anaesthesia (sodium pentobarbital, 0.033 mg g−1 i.p.), and the leads were placed in lead II conformation. Following a 72 h recovery period, mice housed in individual cages were placed on telemetry detection platforms and continuous ECG tracings were acquired for 24 h. ECGs were manually examined for arrhythmias. Ultrasound measurements and ECG intervals were calculated during periods of regular sinus rhythm.
Zebrafish embryology and genetics
The brg1s481 allele was identified in a diploid ENU mutagenesis screen for mutations affecting endodermal organ morphogenesis48. A C-to-T base-pair change at position 754 in the brg1 (smarca4) coding sequence creates a premature STOP codon at amino acid 252. MOs targeting brg1 and p53 have been previously published and validated20,21. RNA in situ hybridization probes for myl7/cmlc2, nppa, bmp4, tbx2b and notch1b have been characterized49,50. For the ncx1h (slc8a1a) probe, a 560 bp PCR product amplified from cDNA was used as a template.
For mosaic labelling of cardiomyocytes, embryos from Tg(cmlc2:eGFPtwu34)+/+ in-crosses were injected at the one-cell stage with 10 pg of pBISceI-cmlc2:dsRed plasmid DNA with I SceI enzyme (NEB) in I SceI buffer.
For time-lapse analysis, Tg(cmlc2:eGFP) control embryos or morphants were mounted in agarose, and imaged at 28.5 °C using a 25× water objective. To count cardiomyocytes at various stages, we used the Tg(cmlc2:dsRedExp-nuchsc4) line. Mounted embryos were imaged with a 40× water immersion lens. Sequential confocal images were taken with a standardized step size of 0.65 ìm in the z-direction. Quantification of myocardial cells, cell migration tracking and three-dimensional reconstructions of confocal stacks were carried out using Volocity (Improvision).
Microarrays and statistical analysis
Affymetrix mouse Gene ST 1.0 arrays were hybridized and scanned according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Raw intensities from CEL files were analysed using Affymetrix Power Tools (APT, version 1.10.1) to generate robust multiarray average51 expression intensities on a log-2 scale for each probe set and various quality metrics. The probe intensities were background-corrected, quantile-normalized and summarized for each probe set using a robust fit of linear models. Linear models were fitted for each gene to estimate genotype effects and associated significance using the limma package52 in R/Bioconductor. Because sample sizes are often small in microarray experiments, the eBayes function in limma computes s.e. that are moderated across all genes on the array. The interpretation of the moderated t-statistics is the same as an ordinary t-statistics. Nkx2–5/Brg1 and Tbx5/Brg1 experiments were analysed separately using 2×2 factorial models. Linear contrasts were used to extract comparisons of interest. P-values were adjusted for multiple testing by controlling for false-discovery rate using the Benjamini–Hochberg method53. Genes differentially expressed >1.3-fold with adjusted P<0.01 were considered significantly different between groups. QRT-PCR and ChIP data were analysed by analysis of variance, followed by post hoc Tukey's test; P<0.05 was considered significant. Pairwise comparisons were made using t-test; P<0.05 was considered significant.
Clustering and pathway analysis
Genes that were declared to be differently expressed were subjected to unsupervized cluster analysis with the R package HOPACH54. All biological replicates within groups were included in cluster analyses. Pearson's correlations between genes were used as the distance metric, and default settings were used for other parameters. Clusters with similar expression patterns between genotypes were collapsed for further analysis. GOElite (www.genmapp.org/go_elite/go_elite.html/) was used to identify overrepresented gene ontology terms and pathways among the sets of differentially expressed genes. All genes that were subjected to expression analysis were used as the 'denominator' gene list for detecting overrepresentation. Null distributions were derived by permutation (n=2000). Significance was assessed using false-discovery rate-adjusted P-values.
Cell culture and ChIP
NIH/3T3 mouse embryonic fibroblasts were seeded in a 24-well format at 40,000 cells per well; 2 days after seeding, cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) with a combination of HA-Tbx5, myc-GATA4 and FLAG-Nkx2–5 overexpression plasmids (200 ng) or empty pcDNA3.1 (600 ng total). esiRNAs were generated as described37; briefly, regions of EGFP or Brg1 were amplified by PCR (using the following primers: eGFP_esi1 (forward): 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGTAAACGGCCACAAGTTCA-3′; eGFP_esi2 (reverse): 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGATGGGGGTGTTCTGCTGGTA-3′; Brg1 esiRNA (forward): 5′-GGGCGGGTGTGTCCCTGTACAACAACAACC-3′; Brg1 esiRNA (reverse): 5′-GGGCGGGTCTGCAGCTCTTGAAGATAGTGG-3′. Brg1 PCR products were further amplified with an adaptor primer containing T7 sequences (5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGACCACGGGCGGGT-3′). EGFP and Brg1 products were then purified using a Qiagen PCR Clean Up kit and were in vitro transcribed using T7 RNA polymerase (Roche). Transcribed RNA was annealed to yield double stranded RNA. After purification (Roche; Quick Spin Columns), 10 μg of double stranded RNA was subjected to digestion using purified glutathione S-transferase (GST)-RNAse III fusion protein and purified by ethanol precipitation to generate pools of 21 bp esiRNAs.
In knockdown experiments, 450 ng of either esiGFP or esiBrg1 was transfected. Relative expression was determined by quantitative PCR using TaqMan probes against Nppa and Brg1; expression was normalized to β-actin (probe-set details in Supplementary Table S1). Each reaction was performed in technical triplicate.
ChIP was performed as previously described8, using chromatin isolated from E12.5 embryonic hearts, with anti-Brg1 antiserum (Upstate 07-478) or normal rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz 2027), using 1 μg of antiserum. PCR was performed using the following primers: Nppa-595F: 5′-TCTTTCACCTGACTGCTAACA-3′, Nppa-12R: 5′-AGCATCTCCCGTTTTTATAG-3′; Gja5-F1: 5′-ACGACTGTGGCAGCAGGTGTTCTGC-3′, Gja5-R1: 5′-AGAACCAGCAGGTGCCCTTTCCCCT-3′. Amplicons were 573 bp long for Nppa and 583 bp long for Gja5. Quantification was performed using the same primers and SYBR green quantification.
J.K.T. and B.G.B. designed the study. J.K.T. performed most of the work on mice. X.L. carried out most of the work on zebrafish, under the direction of I.C.S. C.M. isolated the zebrafish brg1 mutation under the direction of D.Y.R.S. J.M.A. and P.D.-O. performed cell culture assays. H.S. performed chromatin immunoprecipitation under the direction of J.K.T. A.K.H., R.-F.Y. and K.S.P. designed and performed bioinformatics analysis of array data. RNA isolation and preparation were performed by A.D.M. and J.N.W. R.P.H., D.M. and P.C. provided genetically modified mouse strains. Y.Z. and Y.-Q.Z. performed mouse physiological measurements under the direction of B.G.B. and R.M.H., respectively. B.G.B. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.
Additional information
Accession codes: Microarray data have been deposited in GEO under the accession number GSE26191.
How to cite this article: Takeuchi, J. K. et al. Chromatin remodelling complex dosage modulates transcription factor function in heart development. Nat. Commun. 2:187 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1187 (2011).
Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Table
Supplementary Figures S1-S5 and Supplementary Table S1
Supplementary Movie 1
Arrhythmias in brg1 mutant embryo. At 48hpf, the heartbeat in yngs481 embryos (left) is arrhythmic and slow compared to wildtype siblings (right).
Supplementary Movie 2
Brg1 morphant myocardium migration. Cardiomyocytes are marked with GFP expression in Tg(cmlc2:eGFPs843), dorsal view and anterior to top, left side on right since imaging with inverted microscope.
Supplementary Movie 3
Wildtype myocardium migration
Supplementary Movie 4
3D reconstruction of cardiomyocyte nuclei in 48hpf control embryo
Supplementary Movie 5
3D reconstruction of cardiomyocyte nuclei in 48hpf brg1 morphant
Supplementary Movie 6
Cell shape change in wildtype embryo
Supplementary Movie 7
Cardiomyocyte shape in brg1 mutant embryo
Supplementary Movie 8
Circulation in brg1 mutant embryo. At 36hpf, the circulation in yngs481 embryo (lower) is reduced compared to wildtype sibling (upper), but still fairly robust.
Supplementary Data 1
Embryonic day 11.5 heart microarray data for heterozygote and compound heterozygote mutants.
Acknowledgments
We thank T. Sukonnik for immunostaining, D. Miguel-Perez for mouse husbandry, S. Izumo and E.N. Olson for providing mice, B. Panning for esiRNA primers and protocols, B.L. Black and D. Srivastava for critical comments on the manuscript, the Gladstone Genomics Core (Y. Hao and L. Ta) and the Gladstone Histology Core (C. Miller and J.-D. Fish) for excellent services, and G. Howard and S. Ordway for editorial assistance. The CH1 monoclonal antibody developed by J.J.C. Lin was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, The University of Iowa. This work was supported by a California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Fellowship (P.D-O.); a Heart and Stroke Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence in Cardiovascular Research fellowship (X.L.); grants from the NIH/NHLBI (R01 HL54737 to D.Y.R.S., R01 HL085860 to B.G.B.), Human Frontiers Science Program CDA (J.K.T.), Japan Circulation Foundation (J.K.T.), TORAY Foundation (J.K.T. and H.S.) and CIHR Institute of Genetics (Operating Grant 86663 to I.C.S.). B.G.B. is the recipient of the Lawrence J. and Florence A. DeGeorge Charitable Trust/American Heart Association Established Investigator Award. This work was also supported by an NIH/NCRR grant (C06 RR018928) to the J. David Gladstone Institutes and by William H. Younger, Jr (B.G.B.).
  • Olson E. N. Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart. Science 313, 1922–1927 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Srivastava D. Making or breaking the heart: from lineage determination to morphogenesis. Cell 126, 1037–1048 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Bruneau B. G. The developmental genetics of congenital heart disease. Nature 451, 943–948 (2008). [PubMed]
  • Bruneau B. G. et al. . A murine model of Holt-Oram syndrome defines roles of the T-box transcription factor Tbx5 in cardiogenesis and disease. Cell 106, 709–721 (2001). [PubMed]
  • Garg V. et al. . GATA4 mutations cause human congenital heart defects and reveal an interaction with TBX5. Nature 424, 443–447 (2003). [PubMed]
  • Hiroi Y. et al. . Tbx5 associates with Nkx2-5 and synergistically promotes cardiomyocyte differentiation. Nat. Genet. 28, 276–280 (2001). [PubMed]
  • Lickert H. et al. . Baf60c is essential for function of BAF chromatin remodelling complexes in heart development. Nature 432, 107–112 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Takeuchi J. K. & Bruneau B. G. Directed transdifferentiation of mouse mesoderm to heart tissue by defined factors. Nature 459, 708–711 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lessard J. et al. . An essential switch in subunit composition of a chromatin remodeling complex during neural development. Neuron 55, 201–215 (2007). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ho L. & Crabtree G. R. Chromatin remodelling during development. Nature 463, 474–484 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bruneau B. G. Chromatin remodeling in heart development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 505–511 (2010). [PubMed]
  • Reyes J. C. et al. . Altered control of cellular proliferation in the absence of mammalian brahma (SNF2alpha). EMBO J. 17, 6979–6991 (1998). [PubMed]
  • Bultman S. et al. . A Brg1 null mutation in the mouse reveals functional differences among mammalian SWI/SNF complexes. Mol. Cell 6, 1287–1295 (2000). [PubMed]
  • Indra A. K. et al. . Temporally controlled targeted somatic mutagenesis in embryonic surface ectoderm and fetal epidermal keratinocytes unveils two distinct developmental functions of BRG1 in limb morphogenesis and skin barrier formation. Development 132, 4533–4544 (2005). [PubMed]
  • McFadden D. G. et al. . The Hand1 and Hand2 transcription factors regulate expansion of the embryonic cardiac ventricles in a gene dosage-dependent manner. Development 132, 189–201 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Ieda M. et al. . Cardiac fibroblasts regulate myocardial proliferation through beta1 integrin signaling. Dev. Cell 16, 233–244 (2009). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hang C. T. et al. . Chromatin regulation by Brg1 underlies heart muscle development and disease. Nature 466, 62–67 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Link B. A., Fadool J. M., Malicki J. & Dowling J. E. The zebrafish young mutation acts non-cell-autonomously to uncouple differentiation from specification for all retinal cells. Development 127, 2177–2188 (2000). [PubMed]
  • Gregg R. G., Willer G. B., Fadool J. M., Dowling J. E. & Link B. A. Positional cloning of the young mutation identifies an essential role for the Brahma chromatin remodeling complex in mediating retinal cell differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6535–6540 (2003). [PubMed]
  • Eroglu B., Wang G., Tu N., Sun X. & Mivechi N. F. Critical role of Brg1 member of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex during neurogenesis and neural crest induction in zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 235, 2722–2735 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Plaster N., Sonntag C., Busse C. E. & Hammerschmidt M. p53 deficiency rescues apoptosis and differentiation of multiple cell types in zebrafish flathead mutants deficient for zygotic DNA polymerase delta1. Cell Death Differ. 13, 223–235 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Auman H. J. et al. . Functional modulation of cardiac form through regionally confined cell shape changes. PLoS Biol. 5, e53 (2007). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bolck B. et al. . Na+/Ca2+ exchanger overexpression impairs frequency- and ouabain-dependent cell shortening in adult rat cardiomyocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 287, H1435–1445 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Reuter H., Han T., Motter C., Philipson K. D. & Goldhaber J. I. Mice overexpressing the cardiac sodium-calcium exchanger: defects in excitation-contraction coupling. J. Physiol. 554, 779–789 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Baker K., Holtzman N. G. & Burdine R. D. Direct and indirect roles for nodal signaling in two axis conversions during asymmetric morphogenesis of the zebrafish heart. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13924–13929 (2008). [PubMed]
  • Verzi M. P., McCulley D. J., De Val S., Dodou E. & Black B. L. The right ventricle, outflow tract, and ventricular septum comprise a restricted expression domain within the secondary/anterior heart field. Dev. Biol. 287, 437–449 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Zhou Y. Q. et al. . Abnormal cardiac inflow patterns during postnatal development in a mouse model of Holt-Oram syndrome. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 289, H992–H1001 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Zhu Y. H. et al. . Tbx5-dependent pathway regulating diastolic function in congenital heart disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5519–5524 (2008). [PubMed]
  • Garrity D. M., Childs S. & Fishman M. C. The heartstrings mutation in zebrafish causes heart/fin Tbx5 deficiency syndrome. Development 129, 4635–4645 (2002). [PubMed]
  • Biben C. et al. . Cardiac septal and valvular dysmorphogenesis in mice heterozygous for mutations in the homeobox gene Nkx2-5. Circ. Res. 87, 888–895 (2000). [PubMed]
  • Jay P. Y. et al. . Nkx2-5 mutation causes anatomic hypoplasia of the cardiac conduction system. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1130–1137 (2004). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stennard F. A. et al. . Murine T-box transcription factor Tbx20 acts as a repressor during heart development, and is essential for adult heart integrity, function and adaptation. Development 132, 2451–2462 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Reiter J. F. et al. . Gata5 is required for the development of the heart and endoderm in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 13, 2983–2995 (1999). [PubMed]
  • Mori A. D. et al. . Tbx5-dependent rheostatic control of cardiac gene expression and morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 297, 566–586 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Tanaka M., Chen Z., Bartunkova M., Yamazaki N. & Izumo S. The cardiac homeobox gene Csx/Nkx2.5 lies genetically upstream of multiple genes essential for heart development. Development 126, 1269–1280 (1999). [PubMed]
  • Durocher D., Charron F., Warren R., Schwartz R. J. & Nemer M. The cardiac transcription factors Nkx2-5 and GATA-4 are mutual cofactors. EMBO J. 16, 5687–5696 (1997). [PubMed]
  • Yang D. et al. . Short RNA duplexes produced by hydrolysis with Escherichia coli RNase III mediate effective RNA interference in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9942–9947 (2002). [PubMed]
  • Chi T. H. et al. . Sequential roles of Brg, the ATPase subunit of BAF chromatin remodeling complexes, in thymocyte development. Immunity 19, 169–182 (2003). [PubMed]
  • Gebuhr T. C. et al. . The role of Brg1, a catalytic subunit of mammalian chromatin-remodeling complexes, in T cell development. J. Exp. Med. 198, 1937–1949 (2003). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Seo S., Richardson G. A. & Kroll K. L. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling protein Brg1 is required for vertebrate neurogenesis and mediates transactivation of Ngn and NeuroD. Development 132, 105–115 (2005). [PubMed]
  • Griffin C. T., Brennan J. & Magnuson T. The chromatin-remodeling enzyme BRG1 plays an essential role in primitive erythropoiesis and vascular development. Development 135, 493–500 (2008). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stankunas K. et al. . Endocardial Brg1 represses ADAMTS1 to maintain the microenvironment for myocardial morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 14, 298–311 (2008). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chi T. H. et al. . Reciprocal regulation of CD4/CD8 expression by SWI/SNF-like BAF complexes. Nature 418, 195–199 (2002). [PubMed]
  • Novak A., Guo C., Yang W., Nagy A. & Lobe C. G. Z/EG, a double reporter mouse line that expresses enhanced green fluorescent protein upon Cre-mediated excision. Genesis 28, 147–155 (2000). [PubMed]
  • Srinivas S. et al. . Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev. Biol. 1, 4 (2001). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lakso M. et al. . Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 93, 5860–5865 (1996). [PubMed]
  • Riddle R. D., Johnson R. L., Laufer E. & Tabin C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75, 1401–1416 (1993). [PubMed]
  • Ober E. A., Verkade H., Field H. A. & Stainier D. Y. Mesodermal Wnt2b signalling positively regulates liver specification. Nature 442, 688–691 (2006). [PubMed]
  • Berdougo E., Coleman H., Lee D. H., Stainier D. Y. & Yelon D. Mutation of weak atrium/atrial myosin heavy chain disrupts atrial function and influences ventricular morphogenesis in zebrafish. Development 130, 6121–6129 (2003). [PubMed]
  • Yelon D., Horne S. A. & Stainier D. Y. Restricted expression of cardiac myosin genes reveals regulated aspects of heart tube assembly in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 214, 23–37 (1999). [PubMed]
  • Irizarry R. A. et al. . Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4, 249–264 (2003). [PubMed]
  • Smyth G. K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3, Article3 (2004). [PubMed]
  • Benjamini Y. & Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).
  • Pollard K. S. & M. J. van der Laan. in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Using R and Bioconductor (eds Gentleman, R. et al. .) Ch. 13 Springer, 2005).
Articles from NPG Open Access are provided here courtesy of
Nature Publishing Group