PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cancer. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 April 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Published online 2010 November 8. doi:  10.1002/cncr.25630
PMCID: PMC3092033
NIHMSID: NIHMS263779

Phosphorylated AKT Expression is Associated with PIK3CA Mutation, Low Stage and Favorable Outcome in 717 Colorectal Cancers

Abstract

Background

AKT (AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3) is a downstream effector of phosphatidylinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) and plays crucial roles in protein synthesis, cellular metabolism, survival, and proliferation. The PI3K/AKT pathway is commonly activated in human cancers and recognized as a potential target for anticancer therapy. Nonetheless, clinical, molecular or prognostic features of AKT-activated colon cancer remain uncertain.

Methods

Utilizing a database of 717 colorectal cancers in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, Ser473 phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) expression was detected in 448 (62%) tumors by immunohistochemistry. Cox proportional hazard model was used to compute mortality hazard ratio (HR), adjusting for clinical and tumoral features, including PIK3CA, KRAS, BRAF, microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), LINE-1 methylation, TP53 (p53) and FASN (fatty acid synthase).

Results

Tumor p-AKT expression was associated with PIK3CA mutation [odds ratio (OR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-2.80; p=0.015]. p-AKT expression was significantly associated with longer colorectal cancer-specific survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank p=0.0005), univariate Cox regression [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.82; p=0.0006] and multivariate analysis (adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-0.99; p=0.048) adjusting for clinical and molecular variables including PIK3CA, MSI, CIMP and LINE-1 hypomethylation. p-AKT expression was inversely associated with high stage (III-IV) (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.88, p=0.0071).

Conclusions

p-AKT expression in colorectal cancer is associated with low stage and good prognosis. p-AKT may serve as a tissue biomarker to identify patients with superior prognosis and a possible therapeutic target (analogous to estrogen receptor ESR1 in breast cancer).

Keywords: pAKT, PI3K, clinical outcome, personalized medicine, colorectal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

AKT, a serine/threonine protein kinase, is a major downstream effector of phosphatidylinositide-3-kinase (PI3K).1-3 AKT has three isoforms including AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3, and plays crucial roles in regulating a wide range of cellular processes including protein synthesis, cell survival, proliferation, and metabolism.1-3 In human cancer, the PI3K/AKT pathway is aberrantly activated by growth factor stimulation and subsequent activation of receptor tyrosine kinases, as well as by a mutation, deletion, or amplification of a key pathway component (e.g., PIK3CA, PTEN, or AKT1).1-3 Therefore, this pathway has been recognized as an attractive target for anticancer therapy.4-6 Thus, better understanding of the role of AKT activation in human cancer is increasingly important. However, prognostic significance of AKT activation in human cancers remains inconclusive; phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) expression (i.e., AKT activation) has been associated with poor prognosis in some types of cancers,7-9 but with favorable prognosis in other types of cancers.10-14 Studies have shown that p-AKT expression in colorectal cancer is not associated with patient survival;15-18 however, they are all limited by lack of PIK3CA mutation data and/or low statistical power [N<160 in all16-18 but one study15]. Given accumulating evidence on vital roles of AKT in cellular metabolism, we hypothesized that AKT-activated cancers and AKT-inactive cancers might behave differently.

To test this hypothesis, we utilized a database of 717 stage I-IV colorectal cancers in two prospective cohort studies, and examined the prognostic role of p-AKT expression. Microsatellite instability (MSI), the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status and LINE-1 hypomethylation (i.e., global DNA hypomethylation) reflect global genomic and epigenomic aberrations in tumor cells and determine clinical, pathologic, molecular and prognostic characteristics of colorectal cancer.19 It is widely accepted that activating mutations in PIK3CA, KRAS, and BRAF play vital roles in colorectal carcinogenesis. TP53 is a crucial tumor suppressor gene in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. FASN (fatty acid synthase) is physiologically regulated by energy balance and may interact with the PI3K/AKT pathway.20 Prognostic effect of FASN expression in colon cancer differs according to body mass index.21 Since we concurrently assessed these important molecular variables, we could evaluate the independent effect of p-AKT on patient survival after controlling for these molecular events. Our findings of the relationship between p-AKT expression and good outcome suggest that p-AKT may serve as a tissue biomarker to identify patients with better prognosis and a possible therapeutic target (analogous to estrogen receptor ESR1 in breast cancer).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study group

We utilized the database of two prospective cohort studies; the Nurses' Health Study (N=121,701 women followed since 1976),22 and the Health Professional Follow-up Study (N=51,529 men followed since 1986).22 We collected paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from hospitals where patients underwent colorectal cancer resections. Tissue sections from all colorectal cancers were reviewed by a pathologist (S.O.). Based on availability of adequate tissue specimens and follow-up data, a total of 717 colorectal cancers (diagnosed up to 2004) were included. Patients were observed until death or June 30, 2009, whichever came first. Tissue collection and analyses were approved by the Harvard School of Public Health and Brigham and Women's Hospital Institutional Review Boards.

Sequencing of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis

DNA was extracted from tumor. PCR and Pyrosequencing targeted for KRAS,23 BRAF,24 and PIK3CA were performed.25 MSI-high was defined as ≥30% unstable microsatellite markers, and MSI-low/microsatellite stable (MSS) as 0-29% unstable markers.26

Methylation analyses for CpG islands and LINE-1

Bisulfite DNA treatment and real-time PCR (MethyLight) were validated.27 We quantified DNA methylation in 8 CIMP-specific promoters [CACNA1G, CDKN2A (p16), CRABP1, IGF2, MLH1, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1].28-30 CIMP-high was defined as the presence of ≥6/8 methylated promoters, CIMP-low as 1/8-5/8 methylated promoters, and CIMP-0 as the absence (0/8) of methylated promoters.30, 31 To accurately quantify LINE-1 methylation, we utilized Pyrosequencing.32, 33

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed.22 Two 0.6-mm tissue cores each from tumor and normal colonic mucosa were placed in each TMA block. Methods of immunohistochemistry were previously described for TP53 (p53) and FASN.21, 26 AKT1 is partially activated through phosphorylation of Thr308 and reaches its maximum activity after phosphorylation of Ser473 in tandem with that of Thr308. Similar phosphorylation sites are present in AKT2 and AKT3. To date, the most successful biomarker for evaluating the status of AKT activation is Ser473 phosphorylated form of AKT.34 In our current study, we utilized the pan-AKT antibody [Rabbit monoclonal anti-Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (736E11), Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA], which detects AKT1 only when phosphorylated at Ser 473, and AKT2 and AKT3 only when phosphorylated at equivalent sites, according to previous studies.8-10, 15, 17 For phosphorylated-AKT (p-AKT) staining, deparaffinized tissue sections in Antigen Retrieval Citra Solution (Biogenex Laboratories, San Ramon, CA) were treated with microwave in a pressure cooker (25 min). Tissue sections were incubated with 5% normal goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) in phosphate-buffered saline (30 min). Primary antibody against p-AKT (1:100 dilution) was applied, and the slides were maintained at 4°C for overnight, followed by rabbit secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories) (60 min), an avidin–biotin complex conjugate (Vector Laboratories) (60 min), diaminobenzidine (5 min) and methyl-green counterstain. Appropriate positive and negative controls were included in each run of immunohistochemistry. In each case, we recorded cytoplasmic p-AKT expression as no expression, weak expression, moderate expression, or strong expression compared to normal colonic epithelial cells (Figure 1). Considering that AKT is downstream of the PI3K pathway,1-3 we used PIK3CA mutation frequency data to determine a cutoff for p-AKT positivity. We randomly selected 364 tumors as a training set, leaving the remaining 353 as a validation set. Using the training set, the frequency of PIK3CA mutation was as follows: 13% (16/119) in tumors with no expression; 20% (19/94) in tumors with weak expression; 19% (21/110) in tumors with moderate/strong expression. Thus, p-AKT positivity was defined as the presence of weak to strong expression. In the remaining validation set, p-AKT positivity was associated with PIK3CA mutation [odds ratio (OR) 2.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-3.94; p=0.040], confirming the validity of the cutoff for p-AKT positivity, although it might not be the best cutoff. There was no perfect correlation between PIK3CA mutation and p-AKT, in part because there were other mechanisms of AKT activation (i.e., PTEN loss and/or methylation, PIK3CA amplification, and PIK3R1 mutation). p-AKT expression might serve as a surrogate of AKT activation by any of these causes.

Figure 1
Immunohistochemistry for p-AKT expression in colorectal cancer

Each immunohistochemical maker was visually interpreted by one of the investigators (p-AKT by Y.B.; TP53 and FASN by S.O.) unaware of other data. For agreement studies, a random selection of 108-246 cases was examined for each marker by a second pathologist (p-AKT by K.S., TP53 and FASN by K.N.) unaware of other data. The concordance between the two pathologists (all p<0.0001) was 0.81 (κ=0.59, N=132) for p-AKT, 0.87 (κ=0.75, N=108) for TP53, and 0.93 (κ=0.57, N=246) for FASN, indicating good agreement.

Statistical analysis

We used SAS program (Version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All p values were two-sided. When we performed multiple hypothesis testing, a p value for significance was adjusted by Bonferroni correction to p=0.0031. For categorical data, the chi-square test was performed. To assess independent relationship between p-AKT and disease stage (an outcome variable), a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, initially including sex, age at diagnosis (continuous), body mass index (BMI, <30 vs. ≥30 kg/m2), family history of colorectal cancer in any first degree relative (present vs. absent), tumor location (rectum vs. colon), tumor grade (high vs. low), CIMP (high vs. low/0), MSI (high vs. low/MSS), LINE-1 methylation (continuous), BRAF, KRAS, PIK3CA, TP53, FASN, and p-AKT expression. A backward stepwise elimination with a threshold of p=0.20 was used to select variables in the final model. For cases with missing information in any of categorical variables [BMI (0.1%), tumor grade (0.4%), TP53 (0.6%), FASN (0.8%), CIMP (1.7%), MSI (2.0%), BRAF (1.5%), KRAS (1.1%), and PIK3CA (10%)], we included those cases in a majority category of that missing variable in the initial model. After the selection was done, we assigned separate missing indicator variables to those cases with missing information in any of the categorical covariates in the final model.

For survival analysis, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used. For analyses of colorectal cancer-specific mortality, deaths as a result of causes other than colorectal cancer were censored. To assess independent effect of p-AKT on mortality, tumor stage (I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, IV, unknown) was used as a stratifying variable in Cox models using the “strata” option in the SAS “proc phreg” command to avoid residual confounding and overfitting. We constructed a multivariate proportional hazards model to compute a hazard ratio (HR) according to p-AKT status, initially containing sex, age, BMI, family history of colorectal cancer, year of diagnosis, tumor location, tumor grade, TP53, FASN, CIMP, MSI, BRAF, KRAS, PIK3CA, and LINE-1 methylation. A backward stepwise elimination with a threshold of p=0.20 was used to select variables in the final model. The proportionality of hazard assumption was satisfied by evaluating time-dependent variables, which were the cross-product of the p-AKT variable and survival time (p>0.31). An interaction was assessed by including the cross product of p-AKT variable and another variable of interest (without data-missing cases) in a multivariate Cox model, and the Wald test was performed.

RESULTS

p-AKT expression in colorectal cancer

Among 717 colorectal cancers, we observed phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) expression in 448 tumors (62%) by immunohistochemistry (Figure 1). Although variability of p-AKT staining between tissue cores in a given case was not substantial, we obtained four tissue cores from each case to overcome within-tumor heterogeneity. Table 1 shows p-AKT status in relation to clinical, pathologic and molecular features. Notably, there was no difference in frequencies of p-AKT positivity between cases prior to 1995 and those in 1995 or after (p=0.85), suggesting that the age of tissue block might not substantially influence our results. Consistent with a possible causal link between PIK3CA mutation and p-AKT expression, p-AKT expression was significantly associated with PIK3CA mutation [odds ratio (OR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-2.80; p=0.015]. In addition, p-AKT expression was associated positively with FASN expression (p=0.0025), and inversely with stage III-IV disease (p=0.0022) and high tumor grade (p<0.0001).

Table 1
p-AKT expression in colorectal cancer

In multivariate logistic regression analysis assessing the independent relationship between p-AKT expression and disease stage, p-AKT expression was inversely associated with high disease stage (stage III-IV) (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.88; p=0.0071) (Table 2).

Table 2
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the relationship between p-AKT expression and colorectal cancer stage (as an outcome variable)

p-AKT expression and patient survival

During follow-up of 717 patients with survival data (median follow-up time 11.6 years for censored cases), there were 341 deaths, including 210 deaths due to colorectal cancer. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, p-AKT expression was associated with longer colorectal cancer-specific survival (log-rank p=0.0005) and overall survival (log-rank p=0.014) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves for colorectal cancer-specific survival (upper panel) and for overall survival (lower panel) according to p-AKT status in colorectal cancer. The bottom table indicates the number of patients who were alive and at risk of death at each ...

Compared to p-AKT-negative cases, p-AKT-positive cases experienced a significantly lower colorectal cancer-specific mortality in univariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47-0.82; p=0.0006] and multivariate analysis (adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-0.99; p=0.048) (Table 3). The attenuation in the effect of p-AKT expression in the multivariate analysis was principally the result of adjusting for disease stage; when we simply adjusted for disease stage, p-AKT overexpression was associated with HR of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.94). Similar results, although somewhat attenuated, were observed in analysis for overall mortality (Table 3). Our data suggest that, despite the role of AKT activation in carcinogenesis, p-AKT expression marks a subtype of colorectal cancers with indolent behavior, which is analogous to estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer.

Table 3
p-AKT expression in colorectal cancer and patient mortality

Interaction between p-AKT expression and another variable in survival analyses

We examined the influence of p-AKT positivity on cancer-specific mortality across strata of other potential predictors of survival, including age, sex, year of diagnosis, body mass index, family history of colorectal cancer, tumor location, stage, MSI, CIMP, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, LINE-1 methylation, TP53, and FASN. There was no evidence for significant effect modification by any of the variables examined (all Pinteraction≥0.10). Notably, the effect of p-AKT did not significantly differ between the two independent cohort studies (Pinteraction=0.53), or between tumors prior to 1995 and those in 1995 or after (Pinteraction=0.15).

DISCUSSION

We conducted this study to examine the relationship between phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) expression and patient survival in a large cohort of stage I-IV colorectal cancers. AKT has emerged as a central node in cell signaling pathways, downstream of growth factors, cytokines, and other cellular stimuli.1-3 AKT is aberrantly activated in a wide variety of human cancers and is increasingly important as a promising target for cancer therapy.4-6 We have found that p-AKT expression in colorectal cancer is associated with early stage and favorable prognosis, suggesting that p-AKT may be a biomarker to identify patients with superior outcome and a possible therapeutic target (analogous to estrogen receptor in breast cancer).

Examining tumor factors and clinical outcome is important in cancer research.35-39 Studies examining the relation between p-AKT expression and prognosis in human cancers have yielded variable results.7-12 Previous studies on colorectal cancer have suggested no prognostic role of p-AKT expression.15-18 Notably, in the study with over 1000 colorectal cancers,15 tumoral p-AKT expression was associated with early nodal stage, but not independently with patient survival. However, that study15 lacked PIK3CA mutation data. A difference in the prognostic data by that study15 and our current study might be due to a difference in the patient cohorts or the methods to assess p-AKT expression, or simply due to a chance variation between independent studies. In addition, all but one15 studies16-18 were limited by small sample sizes (N<160). Our current study (N=717) has shown that p-AKT expression is associated with PIK3CA mutation as expected from their causal link, and that our method and cutoff for p-AKT positivity are reasonable for evaluating AKT activation levels in paraffin-embedded tissues. Furthermore, in contrast to the prior studies,15-18 we assessed the prognostic effect of p-AKT expression independent of PIK3CA mutation and other molecular events that have been documented to be critical in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Considering experimental data suggesting that AKT plays critical roles in tumor proliferation, survival, invasion, and angiogenesis,1-3, 40 one would expect that p-AKT expression would imply poor prognosis. It is very common to conceive that the presence of oncogene activation (or tumor suppressor inactivation) should imply aggressive tumor behavior. However, this preconception does not always hold true. Colon cancers develop through accumulation of multiple genetic and epigenetic events, and each tumor has its own unique combination of molecular aberrations. Some tumors activate AKT, while others do not. In order to acquire malignant characteristics, those AKT-inactive tumors need to have aberrations which can be an alternative to AKT activation; those aberrations may lead to more aggressive behavior than AKT activation actually does. This is well exemplified by the association between estrogen receptor (ESR1, or ER-alpha) expression in breast cancer and good prognosis. ESR1 is known to contribute to breast cancer development; yet ESR1 expression marks tumors with favorable outcome.41 This is probably because breast cancer without ESR1 expression might have developed through more detrimental events than ESR1 expression. Another example is MSI in colorectal cancer. MSI is known to cause inactivation of a number of tumor suppressors; yet MSI marks tumors with good prognosis.42 The aforementioned preconception that oncogene activation (or tumor suppressor inactivation) should be associated with poor outcome can cause serious publication bias, because reports consistent with this preconception have been regarded favorably during journal's decision process, whereas reports inconsistent with the preconception have been treated unfavorably.43

Another possible explanation for the relationship between AKT activation and good prognosis may be due to “tumor suppressive” roles of AKT.44 AKT has blocked cancer cell mortality and invasion through the transcription factor NFAT 45 or down-regulation of RHO activity.46 Another study has reported that AKT1 activation can promote tumorigenesis but suppresses tumor invasion.47 The inhibitory effect of AKT activation on cancer cell cycle has been reported.48 In addition, it is possible that each AKT isoform may have different functions.49, 50 Future studies are necessary to confirm our observations as well as to elucidate biological mechanisms by which AKT activation affects colorectal tumor behavior.

Interestingly, we found that p-AKT expression was independently associated with FASN expression and low tumor grade; the latter association is consistent with a previous study.15 Inhibition of FASN has resulted in the down-regulation of AKT pathway.20 The PI3K/AKT pathway activation has modulated the expression and/or nuclear maturation of the transcription factor SREBF1, stimulating FASN expression.20 Our finding of the relationship between p-AKT and FASN expression may be consistent with these experimental data.

There are limitations in this study. For example, data on cancer treatment were unavailable. Nonetheless, it is unlikely that chemotherapy use substantially differed according to AKT status in tumor, since such data were unavailable for treatment decision making. In addition, our multivariate survival analysis adjusted for disease stage as finely as possible (I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, IV, unknown) on which treatment decision making was mostly based. As another limitation, beyond cause of mortality, data on cancer recurrences were unavailable in these cohort studies. Nonetheless, colorectal cancer-specific survival might be a reasonable surrogate of colorectal cancer-specific outcome.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of p-AKT expression in cancer tissue has been a challenge, and there is no standardized method. Pre-analytical variables such as tissue processing may have considerable impact on antigenicity of p-AKT, which may be substantially influenced by a slight difference in conditions of immunohistochemical procedure. We tried to minimize such an external source of noise in a number of ways. We constructed tissue microarray (TMA) and performed the immunohistochemical procedure in a very similar condition for all specimens. The quality of tissue sections, which depends on age of tissue and time after cutting the TMA blocks, should be considered. In our current study, p-AKT expression was not associated with age of tissue (i.e., year of diagnosis), supporting that p-AKT antigen might not substantially be deteriorated over time. With regard to time after block cutting, as we cut all TMA blocks into sections around the same time, time after block cutting was uniform from case to case. In addition, we obtained four tissue cores from each case to overcome within-tumor heterogeneity. Interpretation of protein expression took into account background noise if any, and we calibrated against such background noise in each case. Furthermore, any pre-analytical variability was largely non-differential (i.e., random) in nature, and thus, might have conservatively biased our results towards the null hypothesis. Because of a large sample size, we were still able to detect the biologically-reasonable relationship between PIK3CA mutation and p-AKT expression as well as the relations of p-AKT expression with disease stage and prognosis. The cutoff for p-AKT used in this current study needs to be validated in an independent dataset.

There are advantages in utilizing the database of the two prospective cohort studies, the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, to examine prognostic significance of tumor biomarkers. Anthropometric measurements, family history, cancer staging, and other clinical, pathologic, and tumoral molecular data were prospectively collected, blinded to patient outcome. Cohort participants who developed cancer were treated at hospitals throughout the U.S. (in 48 States except for North Dakota and Alaska), and thus more representative colorectal cancers in the general U.S. population than patients in one to a few academic hospitals. There were no demographic difference between cases with tumor tissue analyzed and those without tumor tissue analyzed 22. Finally, our rich tumor database enabled us to simultaneously assess pathologic and tumoral molecular correlates and control for confounding by a number of tumoral molecular alterations.

In summary, our large cohort study has shown that p-AKT expression in colorectal cancer is associated with PIK3CA mutation, early disease stage and favorable prognosis. The high percentage of p-AKT positive patients in this study certainly supports a vital role of AKT activation in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Our findings suggest a possibility that AKT activation may have a predictive role in a manner analogous to estrogen receptor (ESR1) in breast cancer, identifying a subgroup of patients with better prognosis and serving as a therapeutic target at the same time.

Figure 3
Schematic representation of possible relations between AKT activation, disease stage, and patient prognosis.

Acknowledgments

Funding: U.S. National Institute of Health (NIH) grants P01 CA87969 (to S. Hankinson), P01 CA55075 (to W. Willett), P50 CA127003 (to C.S.F.), K07 CA122826 (to S.O.), and R01 CA151993 (to S.O.); the Bennett Family Fund; and the Entertainment Industry Foundation through National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance. Y.B. was supported by a fellowship grant from the Uehara Memorial Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NCI or NIH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

YB, KN and KS contributed equally.

No conflict of interest exists.

References

1. Engelman JA. Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(8):550–62. [PubMed]
2. Manning BD, Cantley LC. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell. 2007;129(7):1261–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Franke TF. PI3K/Akt: getting it right matters. Oncogene. 2008;27(50):6473–88. [PubMed]
4. Courtney KD, Corcoran RB, Engelman JA. The PI3K pathway as drug target in human cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(6):1075–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Ma WW, Adjei AA. Novel agents on the horizon for cancer therapy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(2):111–37. [PubMed]
6. Grant S. Cotargeting survival signaling pathways in cancer. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(9):3003–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Li R, Dai H, Wheeler TM, et al. Prognostic value of Akt-1 in human prostate cancer: a computerized quantitative assessment with quantum dot technology. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(10):3568–73. [PubMed]
8. Tomita Y, Morooka T, Hoshida Y, et al. Prognostic significance of activated AKT expression in soft-tissue sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(10):3070–7. [PubMed]
9. Dai DL, Martinka M, Li G. Prognostic significance of activated Akt expression in melanoma: a clinicopathologic study of 292 cases. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(7):1473–82. [PubMed]
10. Cappuzzo F, Magrini E, Ceresoli GL, et al. Akt phosphorylation and gefitinib efficacy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(15):1133–41. [PubMed]
11. Nam SY, Lee HS, Jung GA, et al. Akt/PKB activation in gastric carcinomas correlates with clinicopathologic variables and prognosis. Apmis. 2003;111(12):1105–13. [PubMed]
12. Shah A, Swain WA, Richardson D, et al. Phospho-akt expression is associated with a favorable outcome in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(8):2930–6. [PubMed]
13. Javle MM, Yu J, Khoury T, et al. Akt expression may predict favorable prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21(11):1744–51. [PubMed]
14. Chadha KS, Khoury T, Yu J, et al. Activated Akt and Erk expression and survival after surgery in pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(7):933–9. [PubMed]
15. Lugli A, Zlobec I, Minoo P, et al. Role of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathways downstream molecules, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and phosphorylated AKT in colorectal cancer-a tissue microarray-based approach. Hum Pathol. 2006;37(8):1022–31. [PubMed]
16. Kato S, Iida S, Higuchi T, et al. PIK3CA mutation is predictive of poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007;121(8):1771–8. [PubMed]
17. Schmitz KJ, Wohlschlaeger J, Alakus H, et al. Activation of extracellular regulated kinases (ERK1/2) but not AKT predicts poor prognosis in colorectal carcinoma and is associated with k-ras mutations. Virchows Arch. 2007;450(2):151–9. [PubMed]
18. Colakoglu T, Yildirim S, Kayaselcuk F, et al. Clinicopathological significance of PTEN loss and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway in sporadic colorectal neoplasms: is PTEN loss predictor of local recurrence? Am J Surg. 2008;195(6):719–25. [PubMed]
19. Ogino S, Goel A. Molecular classification and correlates in colorectal cancer. J Mol Diagn. 2008;10(1):13–27. [PubMed]
20. Menendez JA, Lupu R. Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(10):763–77. [PubMed]
21. Ogino S, Nosho K, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Cohort study of fatty acid synthase expression and patient survival in colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5713–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Chan AT, Ogino S, Fuchs CS. Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in relation to the expression of COX-2. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2131–42. [PubMed]
23. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Brahmandam M, et al. Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by Pyrosequencing. J Mol Diagn. 2005;7(3):413–21. [PubMed]
24. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, Loda M, Fuchs CS. CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low) in colorectal cancer: possible associations with male sex and KRAS mutations. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8(5):582–8. [PubMed]
25. Nosho K, Kawasaki T, Ohnishi M, et al. PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: relationship with genetic and epigenetic alterations. Neoplasia. 2008;10(6):534–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Ogino S, Brahmandam M, Cantor M, et al. Distinct molecular features of colorectal carcinoma with signet ring cell component and colorectal carcinoma with mucinous component. Mod Pathol. 2006;19(1):59–68. [PubMed]
27. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Brahmandam M, et al. Precision and performance characteristics of bisulfite conversion and real-time PCR (MethyLight) for quantitative DNA methylation analysis. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8(2):209–17. [PubMed]
28. Ogino S, Cantor M, Kawasaki T, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studies. Gut. 2006;55(7):1000–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Weisenberger DJ, Siegmund KD, Campan M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2006;38(7):787–93. [PubMed]
30. Nosho K, Irahara N, Shima K, et al. Comprehensive biostatistical analysis of CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer using a large population-based sample. PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3698. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, Kraft P, Loda M, Fuchs CS. Evaluation of markers for CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer by a large population-based sample. J Mol Diagn. 2007;9(3):305–14. [PubMed]
32. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Nosho K, et al. LINE-1 hypomethylation is inversely associated with microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(12):2767–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Irahara N, Nosho K, Baba Y, et al. Precision of pyrosequencing assay to measure LINE-1 methylation in colon cancer, normal colonic mucosa, and peripheral blood cells. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12(2):177–83. [PubMed]
34. Cicenas J. The potential role of Akt phosphorylation in human cancers. Int J Biol Markers. 2008;23(1):1–9. [PubMed]
35. Horst D, Reu S, Kriegl L, Engel J, Kirchner T, Jung A. The intratumoral distribution of nuclear beta-catenin is a prognostic marker in colon cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(10):2063–70. [PubMed]
36. Zlobec I, Minoo P, Baumhoer D, et al. Multimarker phenotype predicts adverse survival in patients with lymph node-negative colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(3):495–502. [PubMed]
37. Buergy D, Fuchs T, Kambakamba P, et al. Prognostic impact of extracellular matrix metalloprotease inducer: immunohistochemical analyses of colorectal tumors and immunocytochemical screening of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow from patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer. 2009;115(20):4667–78. [PubMed]
38. Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Sakamoto E, et al. Gene expression signature for recurrence in stage III colorectal cancers. Cancer. 2009;115(2):283–92. [PubMed]
39. Vilkin A, Niv Y, Nagasaka T, et al. Microsatellite instability, MLH1 promoter methylation, and BRAF mutation analysis in sporadic colorectal cancers of different ethnic groups in Israel. Cancer. 2009;115(4):760–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Itoh N, Semba S, Ito M, Takeda H, Kawata S, Yamakawa M. Phosphorylation of Akt/PKB is required for suppression of cancer cell apoptosis and tumor progression in human colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94(12):3127–34. [PubMed]
41. Payne SJ, Bowen RL, Jones JL, Wells CA. Predictive markers in breast cancer--the present. Histopathology. 2008;52(1):82–90. [PubMed]
42. Popat S, Hubner R, Houlston RS. Systematic review of microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(3):609–18. [PubMed]
43. Fanelli D. Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10271. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Wyszomierski SL, Yu D. A knotty turnabout?: Akt1 as a metastasis suppressor. Cancer Cell. 2005;8(6):437–9. [PubMed]
45. Yoeli-Lerner M, Yiu GK, Rabinovitz I, Erhardt P, Jauliac S, Toker A. Akt blocks breast cancer cell motility and invasion through the transcription factor NFAT. Mol Cell. 2005;20(4):539–50. [PubMed]
46. Liu H, Radisky DC, Nelson CM, et al. Mechanism of Akt1 inhibition of breast cancer cell invasion reveals a protumorigenic role for TSC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(11):4134–9. [PubMed]
47. Hutchinson JN, Jin J, Cardiff RD, Woodgett JR, Muller WJ. Activation of Akt-1 (PKB-alpha) can accelerate ErbB-2-mediated mammary tumorigenesis but suppresses tumor invasion. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):3171–8. [PubMed]
48. Kodama Y, Baxter RC, Martin JL. Insulin-like growth factor-I inhibits cell growth in the a549 non-small lung cancer cell line. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002;27(3):336–44. [PubMed]
49. Irie HY, Pearline RV, Grueneberg D, et al. Distinct roles of Akt1 and Akt2 in regulating cell migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Biol. 2005;171(6):1023–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Samuels Y, Diaz LA, Jr., Schmidt-Kittler O, et al. Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2005;7(6):561–73. [PubMed]