PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
WormBook. Author manuscript; available in PMC May 10, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3091011
NIHMSID: NIHMS288034
Strongyloides spp.*
Mark E. Viney1§ and James B. Lok2
1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
2 Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6008, USA
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel ++ 44 117 928 7469, Fax ++ 44 117 925 7374. Mark.Viney/at/bristol.ac.uk
Abstract
Strongyloides is a genus of parasitic nematodes, which, unusually, has a free-living adult generation. Here we introduce the biology of this genus, especially the fascinating, but complex, life-cycle together with an overview of the taxonomy, morphology, genetics and genomics of this genus.
Strongyloides is a genus containing some 50 species of obligate gastrointestinal parasites of vertebrates (Speare, 1989). Strongyloides infects mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians. Where investigated, most species appear to be able to infect one, or at most a very few, host species. Indeed, in many cases the specific designation may have been attributed largely by the host species in which the parasite was found. This degree of host-species specificity is not unusual among animal parasitic nematodes.
For most nematodes that parasitise the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract, male and female worms live in the host gut and the females lay eggs which pass out of the host in faeces. Depending on the species, these eggs, or infective larvae that develop from them, are eaten (eggs or larvae) or penetrate host skin (larvae) to achieve transmission to a new host. There is then a period of larval migration within the new host before new adults establish in the gut. Strongyloides follows this basic plan, but with significant differences. Female-only adult worms form the parasitic stages of Strongyloides. In addition, there is a dioecious adult generation that occurs outside of the host (Schad, 1989). This free-living adult generation is almost unique among nematode parasites of vertebrates. Originally the parasitic and free-living adult generations of Strongyloides were described as distinct species of Anguillula (Bavay, 1876; Bavay, 1877) until they were discovered to be separate stages of one life-cycle when they were brought together as Strongyloides (Grassi, 1879).
Two species of Strongyloides infect humans, S. stercoralis and S. fuelleborni. S. stercoralis has a cosmopolitan distribution in tropical and subtropical regions (Schad, 1989). S. fuelleborni occurs in African primates where infection can be shared with humans (Pampiglione and Ricciardi, 1972; Hira and Patel, 1980). S. fuelleborni kellyi occurs exclusively in humans in New Guinea (Ashford and Barnish 1989; Ashford et al., 1992). It is estimated that some 100–200 million individuals are infected worldwide with Strongyloides, however these infections can be difficult to detect, so these may be underestimates (Crompton, 1987; Albonico et al., 1999). For comparison, global human infection with the gastro-intestinal nematodes Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworms (Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus) are 1.4, 1.0 and 1.4 billion, respectively (Albonico et al., 1999).
In normal healthy individuals, infection with Strongyloides causes rather little overt pathology (Genta and Caymmi Gomes, 1989; Grove, 1989a), but may compromise an individual’s nutritional status (Stephenson et al., 2000). However, Strongyloides infection in immunocompromised individuals (particularly following the administration of steroids, for example following transplant surgery) can result in disseminated strongyloidiasis, in which worms move beyond the confines of the gut into other organs (see section 5, below; Grove 1989a). This is fatal unless anti-Strongyloides therapy is given. S. fuelleborni kellyi is also the aetiological agent of swollen baby (or belly) syndrome in New Guinea, in which neo-natal infants acquire overwhelming intestinal infections which can also disseminate (Ashford and Barnish, 1989). This is also fatal in the absence of anti-Strongyloides therapy.
Strongyloides is a relatively common infection of wild and domestic animals. Although it is difficult to generalise, the prevalence (i.e., the proportion of a population that is infected) of S. stercoralis infections of humans is often up to 5% in endemic areas with this typically concentrated in younger individuals (which is common for many soil transmitted helminths), with the occasional occurrence of higher prevalence. In a study of rats in the UK the prevalence of S. ratti was 62% (Fisher and Viney, 1998). The relative difficulty of detection of Strongyloides infections, affects the accuracy of reported estimates of prevalence.
Strongyloides infections can be detected by examination of host faeces for Strongyloides eggs or larvae or by examination of the small intestine of a host for parasitic females.
Faeces. In freshly isolated faeces direct examination of a thick smear will reveal eggs and, or L1 stages. The eggs are ellipsoid, 40–85μm in length, with a thin wall containing a larva (see Figure 1). This morphology identifies the eggs as Strongyloides; the presence of larvae in fresh faeces is also diagnostic of Strongyloides infection. The stage (eggs or larvae) present in faeces is a species-specific character (see Figure 1). In this way, for example, S. stercoralis and S. fuelleborni infections can be differentiated by the presence of larvae or eggs, respectively.
Figure 1
Figure 1
An egg and a first stage larva (left and right, respectively) of S. ratti in fresh faeces
Faeces can be sampled by collection of fresh faeces from the ground, by collection directly from the rectum (of large domestic animals) or, for humans, from volunteered stool samples. Direct examination of faeces can diagnose relatively high intensity (i.e., a large number of worms per host) Strongyloides infections. For lower intensity infections, larvae can be collected from a greater faecal mass by the use of a Baermann funnel (see Strongyloides stercoralis: a model for translational research on parasitic nematode biology) or by nematode egg concentration techniques on formalin preserved stool samples. Faecal samples can also be grown in faecal cultures, from which infective L3s can be obtained (see section 8, below and see Strongyloides stercoralis: a model for translational research on parasitic nematode biology). The infective L3 morphology (see section 4, below) will identify Strongyloides larvae.
It is important to examine fresh faeces for two reasons (Ashford and Barnish, 1989). Firstly, Strongyloides eggs rapidly hatch to release larvae, and so examination of fresh faeces allows proper determination of the stage passed in faeces. Secondly, faeces collected from the ground can be rapidly contaminated by free-living nematodes, making the subsequent identification and collection of Strongyloides larvae more difficult.
Strongyloides parasitic females can be observed in the small intestine of infected hosts. This, obviously, requires the sacrifice of the host. Strongyloides parasitic females are, in general, concentrated in the upper half-to-third of the small intestine. Direct microscopical examination can reveal parasitic females or, more usually, the trails of dark eggs left behind the female as she migrates through the intestinal mucosa (see Figure 2). To do this the intestine is opened longitudinally and the luminal contents removed; more easy viewing can be achieved by squashing the open small intestine between two glass plates, which are then examined microscopically (Wilkes et al., 2004). Live parasitic females can be obtained by vertically suspending longitudinally opened intestines in media (Wilkes et al., 2004).
Figure 2
Figure 2
A S. ratti parasitic female (W) and her trail of eggs (E) in situ in the small intestine of a rat
Nematode phylogenetic reconstruction based on rRNA SSU places Strongyloides (Rhabditida, Strongyloididae; Anderson, 2000) in clade IVa, which is a sister clade to plant parasitic and invertebrate parasitic nematodes (clade IVb; Blaxter et al., 1998). C. elegans (Rhabditida, Rhabditidae) is in clade V together with other parasitic nematodes (order Strongyloida). Therefore the taxonomic arrangement of Caenorhabditis and Strongyloides is not consistent with the reconstructed phylogeny. Note the difference between the taxonomic order Strongyloida and the family Strongyloidea (order Rhabditida), which contains Strongyloides spp.; a potential source of great confusion.
Parastrongyloides is the sister genus to Strongyloides (Dorris et al., 2002). Parastrongyloides has a similar life-cycle to Strongyloides except that there are parasitic males as well as females, and the free-living forms are able to go through multiple, sequential generations outside of the host, apparently indefinitely (see section 5, below; Grant et al., 2006a). Parastrongyloides was first described from moles but is more widely known from Australasian marsupials (Morgan, 1928; Mackerras, 1959).
Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Strongyloides has suggested the existence of two clades within the genus (Dorris et al., 2002). This analysis has not been able to separate morphologically defined species, including S. stercoralis and S. fuelleborni.
The morphology of the parasitic and free-living phases of the life-cycle differs. The parasitic females are approximately 2mm in length, with blunt-ended tails, and an elongated, straight-sided (filariform) oesophagus, occupying approximately one third of the body length (see Figure 3; Speare, 1989). The ovary is didelphic and opens at the vulva which is positioned approximately two thirds along the body length. The free-living adults stages are approximately 1mm in length, with the female slightly larger than the male (see Figure 4). Both sexes have a rhabditiform oesophagus; the free-living female has a didelphic ovary and a vulva at the mid-point of the body (Speare, 1989). The general structure, organisation and appearance of Strongyloides free-living females and C. elegans hermaphrodites are similar. Infective L3s, the hypothesised analogue of dauer larvae of free-living nematodes (Hotez et al., 1993), are, like C. elegans dauer larvae, radially constricted, with a filariform oesophagus approximately half the length of the larva (see Figure 5). These larvae have a tripartite pointed tail which when viewed with a dissecting microscope appears like a simple fork (see Figure 5); these larvae are highly active in liquid following gentle agitation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A parasitic female of S. ratti
Figure 4
Figure 4
A free-living adult female and male (left and right, respectively) of S. ratti
Figure 5
Figure 5
An infective L3 of S. ratti (left, scale bar = 100μm) and showing the forked tail (right, scale bar = 10μm).
There are a number of characters used for species identification. For the parasitic females these are the disposition of the ovaries (parallel to or spiralled around the intestine); the en face view of the stoma (Little, 1966); the stage passed in host faeces (i.e., eggs, larvae, or eggs and larvae) and more recently, the morphology of the peri-vulval lateral cuticle (Speare,1989; Viney and Ashford, 1990). Morphometric comparison of body size and the relative position of various structures is also used extensively. The means of recovery of these parasitic stages (e.g., collection from intestine or from faeces following host anthelminthic therapy) as well as the effects of the host immune response on the morphology of S. ratti parasitic females (e.g., Kimura et al., 1999), will reduce the utility of these morphometric approaches.
For the free-living adult males and females, morphometrics are also important, as too is the arrangement of the peri-cloacal papillae of the male (Speare, 1989). The forked tail of the infective L3s is a particularly clear diagnostic character for Strongyloides (see Figure 5), which allows easy allows differentiation from other nematodes that may contaminate faecal samples.
The life-cycle of Strongyloides is both complicated and somewhat tricky to understand, but also one part of the fascination of the genus. This description is primarily based on the life-cycle of S. ratti (a parasite of the rat), which has been extensively studied; some of these details are likely to vary in other species.
Hosts become infected when free-living infective L3s penetrate the skin. Naturally this occurs by the chance coming together of host skin and larvae, though this is facilitated by dispersal and nictation behaviours of the larvae. In the laboratory this comes about by the deliberate application of infective L3s to host skin or by subcutaneous injection (Tindall and Wilson, 1988). These larvae migrate through the host body, such that from 24 hours post infection (p.i.) they are found in the naso-frontal region of the host, from where they are, presumably, swallowed to reach the small intestine (Tindall and Wilson, 1988). This naso-frontal route of migration has been most thoroughly determined in S. ratti; in other species of Strongyloides (and other genera of skin-penetrating nematodes) migration through the lungs is also thought to be important. During this migration they moult via an L4 stage so that there are adult parasitic female worms present in the gut from approximately 4 days p.i., with reproduction commencing shortly thereafter, detected by the presence of eggs and, or larvae in the faeces (Kimura et al., 1999).
In the host faeces the eggs hatch to release first-stage larvae (L1; see Figure 6). These L1s have alternative potential developmental fates. In one fate they develop via L2 – L4 stages into rhabditiform male and female worms; this is the free-living adult generation. This type of development is known as indirect, sexual or heterogonic development. The free-living adults mate and the female lays eggs which hatch to release L1s which moult via an L2 into infective filariform L3 stages. These infective L3 stages are long lived and can persist in the environment until they encounter a suitable host. Their behaviour is to move away from the host faeces in which they have developed, a behaviour which is likely to enhance their probability of finding a host.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The life-cycle of Strongyloides ratti
The alternative fate of the L1s that hatch from eggs passed in faeces is that they moult via an L2 into infective L3s. This type of development is known as direct, asexual or homogonic development. Infective L3s that have developed via the direct or indirect route are, apparently, the same.
For most Strongyloides species only one free-living adult generation occurs. However, up to nine (decreasingly fecund) free-living generations have been observed for S. planiceps, though in the same study S. stercoralis had only one free-living adult generation (Yamada et al., 1991). Strongyloides therefore differs from its relative Parastrongyloides which has apparently unlimited successive free-living generations (Grant et al., 2006a).
The free-living adult generation of Strongyloides (and Parastrongyloides) is therefore rather similar to the life-cycle of C. elegans, i.e., L1 – L4 stages that develop into free-living adults, which mate to produce eggs and L1 progeny. However, the major difference is that the progeny of Strongyloides spp. free-living adults develop into infective L3s, the hypothesised analogue of dauer larvae (Hotez et al., 1993).
S. stercoralis can undergo autoinfection, that is, repeated generations of development in the same host individual. Autoinfection appears to be unique to S. stercoralis within the genus (and also essentially unique among other genera of gastrointestinal parasites of vertebrates) and largely accounts for it being a serious pathogen of humans. Autoinfection involves accelerated development by larval progeny of parasitic females such that they develop into infective L3s within the gut, which then penetrate directly into the tissues of the primary host. Thus here, the entire life-cycle is completed within a host and there are no stages external to the host. Autoinfection may result in dissemination of L3 through many organs and tissues of the host, as well as the establishment of new parasitic females in the gut. In the absence of treatment, subsequent rounds of autoinfection are possible, resulting in fulminant expansion of parasite populations and multi-organ involvement with potentially fatal consequences for the host (Igra-Siegman et al., 1981). Groups at risk of such so-called disseminated S. stercoralis infections, include patients who are immunocompromised as a result of corticosteroid therapy, various neoplasms or infection with the human T lymphotropic virus-1 (Carvalho and Da Fonseca Porta, 2004; Lim et al., 2004).
A prominent and intriguing subgroup of disseminated strongyloidiasis cases are of former far-east prisoners of war (World War II) who now reside in Europe, Australasian or North America and present with the disease as much as 50 years after leaving the endemic area. Corticosteroid therapy and, or concurrent cancer treatment are common features of these cases (Gill et al., 2004; Gill and Bell, 1979). The onset of disseminated strongyloidiasis decades after the last possible exposure to the parasite is extremely serious for elderly patients. But, this also makes clear a salient feature of the infection biology of S. stercoralis, namely the capacity to maintain exceedingly chronic infections in hosts. Such hyperchronic infections usually go undiagnosed due to the paucity or absence of larvae in the faeces. Alternative hypotheses for the chronicity of these infections are that either there are dormant larvae in the tissues or senescent, non-reproductive female worms in the intestine, with immunosuppression triggering either reactivation of dormant larvae or resumption of egg laying by barren parasitic females. Data from studies conducted over a relatively short time frame (77 days) in experimentally infected dogs favour the latter mechanism involving resumed oviposition by barren female worms (Mansfield et al., 1996).
Hypobiosis or dormancy of Strongyloides L3s may or may not be central to the maintenance of chronic infections, but it is key to another mode of transmission: transmammary transmission. There is evidence of transmammary transmission in S. ratti and S. venezuelensis in rats (Nolan and Katz, 1981; Kawanabe et al., 1988), S. stercoralis in dogs (Shoop et al., 2002), S. fuelleborni kellyi in humans (Ashford et al., 1992) and several species affecting livestock including S. ransomi in swine (Stewart et al., 1976), S. westeri in horses (Lyons, 1994) and S. papillosus in ruminants (Moncol and Grice, 1974). Infective L3s transmitted by the transmammary route presumably arrest their development and migration in the mammary glands, and then re-activate at lactation. Transmammary transmission also occurs in other parasitic nematodes that have a phase of within-host tissue migration during their life cycles, including ascarid roundworms and hookworms (Shoop and Corkum, 1987; Stone and Smith, 1973).
Sex determination in S. ratti is an XX/X0, female/male system. XX parasitic females produce XX female and X0 male larvae (Harvey and Viney, 2001). It is not known whether this system of sex determination relies on the ratio of X chromosomes to autosomes, as occurs in C. elegans, or whether it relies simply on the absolute number of X chromosomes. The male larvae develop into free-living males only. The XX female larvae have an environmentally determined choice, between developing into free living adult females or into infective L3s. These XX infective L3s develop into parasitic females directly. XX free-living females and X0 free-living males mate, and produce XX, female-only infective L3 progeny, which can develop into parasitic females (Harvey and Viney, 2001). Therefore, as a consequence of some process acting either during male gametogenesis or at fertilisation, all progeny inherit the paternal X chromosome (see Figure 6).
The sex ratio of S. ratti is highly variable between different isolates, ranging from apparently nearly all female to 20 - 50 % male and this can change over time (see section 7, below; Viney et al., 1992; Harvey et al., 2000). This is in contrast to the generally highly female biased sex ratio of C. elegans, which perhaps suggests that the mechanisms that control the sex ratio in these two genera are different (Harvey and Viney, 2001).
The parasitic females of S. ratti reproduce parthenogenetically (Viney, 1994). This parthenogenesis is genetically mitotic, as shown by the absence of allelic segregation. Thus, the female progeny of a parasitic female are identical to each and to their mother. Formally, this parthenogenesis may occur either by mitotic parthenogenesis or by types of meiotic parthenogenesis (in which meiosis is modified to restore the diploid state) in which allelic segregation does not occur (Hughes, 1989). Single parasitic female infections can therefore give rise to isofemale lines (Viney et al., 1992). The free-living adult generation of S. ratti and S. papillosus reproduces by conventional sexual reproduction (Viney et al., 1993; Eberhardt et al., 2007). The maximum life-time fecundity of S. ratti free-living females is less than 40 (Gardner et al., 2004).
There has been extensive cytological investigation of Strongyloides, investigating both sex determination and means of reproduction of the parasitic and free-living adult generations (e.g., Triantaphyllou and Moncol, 1977; Albertson et al., 1979). The genetic analysis of S. ratti and S. papillosus and the cytological analyses of many species do not agree. This suggests that the carefully observed and recorded cytology may not reliably reveal the genetics of Strongyloides.
The extent to which indirect (or heterogonic) and direct (or homogonic) development occur in the free-living phases of the Strongyloides life-cycle depends on the sex ratio of the free-living generation and on a range of environmental conditions. Again, these phenomena are most thoroughly understood for S. ratti. For S. ratti, the developmental choice of XX female larvae is affected by environmental conditions. For example, the temperature at which faeces containing developing larvae is held external to the host affects development, such that female larvae preferentially develop into free-living adult females (indirect development) at higher temperatures (Viney, 1996). It is probable that many other environmental factors (e.g., food quantity and quality) may have similar effects. There has been extensive investigation of a wide range of factors for a number of species (Arizono, 1976; Moncol and Triantaphyllou, 1978; Minematsu et al., 1989; see Figure 6).
For S. ratti, the immune status of the host from which developing larvae are passed also affects the development of the free-living larvae. This occurs in two ways. Firstly, XX female larvae preferentially develop into adult free-living females (indirect development) when passed from hosts mounting an anti-S. ratti immune response (Gemmill et al., 1997; Harvey et al., 2000). In addition, the sex ratio of larvae passed from hosts mounting such an immune response becomes more male biased (Harvey et al., 2000). The combined effect of the host immune response is therefore that comparatively more free-living adult males and females develop.
There is yet further complexity. XX female larvae are comparatively more sensitive to environmental temperature (measured as their developmental response) when passed from hosts mounting an anti-S. ratti response. The effect of the host immune response and its interaction with environmental conditions, is that indirect development is favoured by larvae passed from hosts mounting an anti-S. ratti immune response (Harvey et al., 2000).
There are some interesting implications of this sophisticated control of these developmental choices. Firstly, the mechanism by which an apparently environmental feature (the host immune response) affects the sex ratio of the progeny is not known. It is also not clear how developing larvae measure the host immune response and, or how this measurement is ‘remembered’ through time, since the host immune response is, presumably, measured within the host, yet the developmental consequences occur later, and outside of the host (Viney, 2002; Crook and Viney, 2005).
For S. ratti, there is extensive inter-isolate variation in the predominant nature of the development of the free-living generation. For example, isolates of S. ratti from the UK show an almost 100% homogonic development (Viney et al., 1992). Such inter-isolate variation implies that there is extensive variation in the sex ratio of the progeny of the parasitic female generation and, or in the sensitivity of larvae to environmental conditions. The degree of direct and indirect development can be artificially selected (Viney, 1996).
The hypothesised analogy between the dauer larvae of free-living nematodes and infective L3 stages of parasitic nematodes has been noted before (Riddle and Albert, 1997; Hotez et al., 1993). The analogy is particularly attractive with Strongyloides, because of the similarity between the free-living life-cycle of Strongyloides and that of C. elegans. This analogy has been investigated. For S. stercoralis, laser ablation of amphidial neurons has identified the two that are necessary to control the female developmental decision. These amphidial neurons were identified by analogy with C. elegans (Ashton et al., 1995; Ashton et al., 1998; Ashton and Schad, 1996).
The central role of daf-7 in controlling the dauer-formation decision of C. elegans (Ren et al., 1996), has promoted investigation of putative homologous genes in parasitic nematodes, including S. ratti and S. stercoralis. However, based on comparison of the life-cycle stage expression pattern, this has not supported the parasitic nematode infective L3 - free-living nematode dauer larvae analogy (Crook et al., 2005; Massey et al., 2005; Viney et al., 2005).
Strongyloides is surprisingly easy to maintain in the laboratory. To grow the free-living generation, faeces (collected from an infected laboratory animal) simply need to be maintained damp and at a slightly elevated temperature. For some host species (carnivores, primates, or anything with particularly smelly faeces) the faecal material should be mixed with wetted activated charcoal. There are many different ways in which the faeces can be cultured, with the ‘sophistication’ of these different methods simply seeking to allow the larval and adult stages to separate themselves from faecal material. The methods for S. stercoralis are given in detail in Strongyloides stercoralis: a model for translational research on parasitic nematode biology. Larvae recovered from faecal cultures can also be maintained on modified NGM agar plates (Gardner et al., 2004; Li et al., 2006).
Infective L3s recovered from faecal cultures can be used to infect host animals. This can be done ‘naturally’ by applying larvae to dampened skin or fur (Tindall and Wilson, 1988). More routinely, infective L3s can be inoculated subcutaneously by injection (e.g., Wilkes et al., 2004). The eggs and larvae of Strongyloides passed in faeces are susceptible to desiccation. This has two consequences. Firstly, if infected hosts are maintained in dry conditions, then between-animal transmission within an animal house will not occur. Secondly, when collecting faeces with which to initiate faecal cultures, either freshly deposited faeces must be collected or cages must be arranged so that faeces collect onto a damp surface.
The biology of the parasitic phase, principally the parasitic females, is the least well known, largely because of the relative difficulty of working with these stages. The females are embedded in the mucosa of the small intestine, often close to the crypts of Lieberkühn (Dawkins et al., 1983). The females migrate through the mucosa, leaving trails of eggs (see Figure 2; Grove et al., 1987). These eggs then, presumably passively, make their way to the gut lumen, before being passed out of the host in faeces either before and, or shortly after hatching depending on the species. Parasitic females are usually concentrated in the proximal part of the small intestine.
Infected hosts make an anti-Strongyloides immune response against both larvae migrating from the site of infection to the intestine, and against intestinal parasitic females. The nature of this response differs between these sites and stages of Strongyloides (Bell et al., 1981; Korenaga et al., 1983). The host immune response has deleterious effects on the parasitic females. Parasitic females become shorter, their fecundity is reduced and they become more posteriorly positioned in the host intestine as an anti-Strongyloides immune response develops (Kimura et al., 1999; Wilkes et al., 2004). These effects either do not occur in immunodeficient hosts (e.g., in nude rats which are athymic and, hence, have no T-cell arm of the immune system) or are reversible if the host is immunosuppressed (Gemmill et al., 1997; Viney et al., 2006). Ultimately these effects of the host immune response result in most experimental animals losing their infections after a period of time. For S. ratti in rats, readily detectable patent infections last for approximately a month, though some worms persist for up to about 10 weeks (Kimura et al., 1999; Wilkes et al., 2004). S. ratti infections of nude rats last for approximately a year (403 days), with the parasitic females dying of senescence (Gardner et al., 2006). The maximum lifespan of S. ratti free-living females is five days (Gardner et al., 2004); thus, the two female forms of the S. ratti life-cycle have an 80-fold difference in their maximum lifespan (Gardner et al., 2006).
For S. stercoralis, host immunosuppression is used both to enhance the longevity and intensity of infection, and to facilitate experimental autoinfection (Grove et al., 1983; see Strongyloides stercoralis: a model for translational research on parasitic nematode biology).
Strongyloides infections can readily be treated with anthelminthic drugs both therapeutically and experimentally. The drug of choice is thiabendazole, though ivermectin is also effective, especially for disseminated infection (Grove, 1989b; Conway et al., 1995; Turner et al., 2005).
There have been expressed sequence tag (EST) analyses of S. stercoralis (free-living L1 and infective L3s) and S. ratti (free-living L1, L2, mixed free-living adults and infective L3s, parasitic females; Mitreva et al., 2004; Thompson et al., 2005).
For S. stercoralis, c. 11,000 ESTs were obtained, which grouped into 3,311 clusters (the majority of which are likely to be single genes), of which 85% had significant BLAST alignments. Comparison of S. stercoralis L1- and infective L3-biased or -specific clusters with C. elegans nutrient-rich- or dauer-specific genes, showed significant matches between S. stercoralis L1 and C. elegans nutrient-rich-specific transcripts only; thus the conservation of the S. stercoralis infective L3 - C. elegans dauer transcriptional profiles was not supported by this analysis (Mitreva et al., 2004).
For S. ratti, c. 15,000 ESTs were obtained, which grouped into 4,152 clusters, with these distributed equally between the free-living and parasitic cDNA libraries (Thompson et al., 2005). 75% of these clusters had significant BLAST alignments; 25% had no significant alignment. This high level of non-alignment is a feature of nematode EST analyses, which probably reflects both the large evolutionary distance between taxa as well as the diversity of life histories (Parkinson et al., 2004). There was substantial free-living and parasitic stage-specificity in detected ESTs (Thompson et al., 2006). The S. ratti ESTs have been used to construct microarrays, which have been used for expression analysis of the free-living and parasitic stages (Thompson et al., 2006). Overall, using Strongyloides EST representation and microarray data, there was rather little evidence for the conservation of transcriptional profiles between S. ratti and S. stercoralis or C. elegans (Thompson et al., 2006).
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is now in the process of sequencing the S. ratti genome (together with four other helminth species) as a reference genome, with subsequent whole genome shotgun sequencing of the S. stercoralis genome planned (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Helminths/). This gene discovery will facilitate research on these species. However, in view of the substantial diversity among the nematodes and the relative lack of tools for investigating gene function in parasitic species, a very substantial amount of work remains to be done.
Transgenic methods have very recently been developed for S. stercoralis, and for the related nematode P. trichosuri (Li et al., 2006; Grant et al., 2006b; see Strongyloides stercoralis: a model for translational research on parasitic nematode biology).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Simon Harvey, Gerhard Schad and Fiona Thompson for their comments on earlier versions of this chapter and for the help of David Tricker with the figures. MEV would like to thank the Medical Research Council, The Wellcome Trust and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council for financial support. JBL gratefully acknowledges financial support from the US National Institutes of Health (grants AI50688, AI22662 and RR02512) and the Ellison Medical Foundation (ID-IA-0037-02).
Footnotes
*Edited by Jonathan Hodgkin and Philip Anderson.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
  • Albonico M, Crompton DWT, Savioli L. Control strategies for human intestinal nematode infections. Adv Parasitol. 1999;42:277–341. [PubMed]
  • Albertson DG, Nwaorgu OC, Sulston JE. Chromatin diminution and a chromosomal mechanism of sexual differentiation in Strongyloides papillosus. Chromosoma. 1979;75:75–87. [PubMed]
  • Anderson RC. Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission. Oxford: CABI Publishing; 2000.
  • Arizono N. Studies on the free-living generations of Strongyloides planiceps Rogers 1943. 1. Effects of quantity of food on population density on the developmental types. Jap J Parasitol. 1976;25:274–282.
  • Ashford RW, Barnish GB. Strongyloides fuelleborni and similar parasites in animals. In: Grove DI, editor. Strongyloidiasis a major roundworm infection of man. London: Taylor and Francis; 1989. pp. 271–286.
  • Ashford RW, Barnish G, Viney ME. Strongyloides fuelleborni kellyi: Infection and disease in Papua New Guinea. Trends Parasitol. 1992;8:314–318. [PubMed]
  • Ashton FT, Schad GA. Amphids in Strongyloides stercoralis and other parasitic nematodes. Trends Parasitol. 1996;12:187–194. [PubMed]
  • Ashton FT, Bhopale VM, Fine AE, Schad GA. Sensory neuroanatomy of a skin-penetrating nematode parasite Strongyloides stercoralis. I. Amphidial neurons. J Comp Neurol. 1995;357:281–295. [PubMed]
  • Ashton FT, Bhopale VM, Holt D, Smith G, Schad GA. Developmental switching in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides stercoralis is controlled by the ASF and ASI amphidial neurons. J Parasitol. 1998;84:691–695. [PubMed]
  • Bavay A. Sur l’Anguillule stercorale. (Presentée par M.P Gervias) C.R Hebd Séances. Acad Sci. 1876;83:694–696.
  • Bavay A. Sur l’Anguillule intestinale (Anguillula intestinalis), nouveau ver nématoïde, trouvé par le Dr. Normand chez les malades atteints de diarrhée de Cochinchine (Presentée par M.P Gervias) C.R Hebd Séances. Acad Sci. 1877;84:266–268.
  • Bell RG, Adams LS, Gerb J. Strongyloides ratti: Dissociation of the rat’s protective immunity into systemic and intestinal components. Exp Parasitol. 1981;52:386–395. [PubMed]
  • Blaxter ML, De Ley P, Garey JR, Liu LW, Scheldeman P, Vierstraete A, Vanfleteren JR, Mackey LY, Dorris M, Frisse LM, Vida JT, Thomas WK. A molecular evolutionary framework for the phylum Nematoda. Nature. 1998;392:71–75. [PubMed]
  • Carvalho EM, Da Fonseca Porto A. Epidemiological and clinical interaction between HTLV-1 and Strongyloides stercoralis. Parasite Immunol. 2004;26:487–497. [PubMed]
  • Conway DJ, Lindo JF, Robinson RD, Bundy DAP. Towards effective control of Strongyloides stercoralis. Trends Parasitol. 1995;11:420–424.
  • Crompton DWT. Human helminthic populations. In: Pawlowski ZS, editor. Bailliere’s Clinical Tropical Medicine and Communicable Diseases. London: Academic Press; 1987. pp. 489–510.
  • Crook M, Viney ME. The effect of non-immune stresses on the development of Strongyloides ratti. Parasitology. 2005;131:383–392. [PubMed]
  • Crook M, Thompson FJ, Grant WN, Viney ME. The role of daf-7 in the development of Strongyloides ratti and Parastrongyloides trichosuri. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;139:213–223. [PubMed]
  • Dawkins HJS, Robertson TA, Papadimitriou JM, Grove DI. Light and electron microscopical studies of the location of Strongyloides ratti in the mouse intestine. Parasitol Res. 1983;69:357–370. [PubMed]
  • Dorris M, Viney ME, Blaxter ML. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the genus Strongyloides and related nematodes. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1507–1517. [PubMed]
  • Eberhardt AG, Mayer WE, Streit A. The free-living generation of the nematode Strongyloides papillosus undergoes sexual reproduction. Int J Parasitol. 2007;37:989–1000. [PubMed]
  • Fisher MC, Viney ME. The population genetic structure of the facultative sexual parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti in wild rats. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 1998;265:703–709. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gardner MP, Gems D, Viney ME. Aging in a very short-lived nematode. Exp Gerontol. 2004;39:1267–1276. [PubMed]
  • Gardner MP, Gems D, Viney ME. Extraordinary plasticity in aging in Strongyloides ratti implies a gene-regulatory mechanism of lifespan evolution. Aging Cell. 2006;5:315–323. [PubMed]
  • Gemmill AW, Viney ME, Read AF. Host immune status determines sexuality in a parasitic nematode. Evolution. 1997;51:393–401.
  • Genta RM, Caymmi Gomes MC. Strongyloidiasis a major roundworm infection of man. In: Grove DI, editor. Pathology. London: Taylor and Francis; 1989. pp. 105–132.
  • Gill GV, Bell DR. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in former Far East prisoners of war. BMJ. 1979;2:572–574. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gill GV, Beeching NJ, Khoo S, Bailey JW, Partridge S, Blundell JW, Luksza AR. A British Second World War veteran with disseminated strongyloidiasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004;98:382–386. [PubMed]
  • Grant WN, Stasiuk S, Newton Howes J, Ralston M, Bisset SA, Heath DD, Shoemaker Parastrongyloides trichosuri, a nematode of mammals that is uniquely suited to genetic analysis. Int J Parasitol. 2006a;35:453–466. [PubMed]
  • Grant WN, Skinner SJM, Newton Howes J, Grant K, Shuttleworth G, Heath DD, Shoemaker CB. Heritable transgenesis of Parastrongyloides trichosuri: a nematode parasite of mammals. Int J Parasitol. 2006b;36:475–483. [PubMed]
  • Grassi GB. Sovra l’Anguillula intestinale. Rendiconti del Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, Milano, second series. 1879;12:228–233.
  • Grove DI. Clinical manifestations. In: Grove DI, editor. Strongyloidiasis a major roundworm infection of man. London: Taylor and Francis; 1989a. pp. 155–174.
  • Grove DI. Strongyloidiasis a major roundworm infection of man. In: Grove DI, editor. Treatment. London: Taylor and Francis; 1989b. pp. 199–231.
  • Grove DI, Heenan PJ, Northern C. Persistent and disseminated infections with Strongyloides stercoralis in immunosuppressed dogs. Int J Parasitol. 1983;13:483–490. [PubMed]
  • Grove DI, Warton A, Yu LL, Northern C, Papadimitriou JM. Light and electron microscopical studies of the location of Strongyloides stercoralis in the jejunum of the dog. Int J Parasitol. 1987;17:1257–1265. [PubMed]
  • Harvey SC, Gemmill AW, Read AF, Viney ME. The control of morph development in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 2000;267:2057–2063. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Harvey SC, Viney ME. Sex determination in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Genetics. 2001;158:1527–1533. [PubMed]
  • Hira PR, Patel BG. Human strongyloidiasis due to the primate species Strongyloides fuelleborni. Trop Geogr Med. 1980;32:23–29. [PubMed]
  • Hotez P, Hawdon J, Schad GA. Hookworm larval infectivity, arrest and amphiparatenesis: The Caenorhabditis elegans Daf-c paradigm. Trends Parasitol. 1993;9:23–26. [PubMed]
  • Hughes RN. A functional biology of clonal animals. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.
  • Igra-Siegman Y, Kapila R, Sen P, Kaminski ZC, Louria DB. Syndrome of hyperinfection with Strongyloides stercoralis. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:397–407. [PubMed]
  • Kawanabe M, Nojima H, Uchikawa R. Transmammary transmission of Strongyloides ratti. Parasitol Res. 1988;75:50–56. [PubMed]
  • Kimura E, Shinotoku Y, Kadosaka T, Fujiwara M, Kondo S, Itoh M. A second peak of egg excretion in Strongyloides ratti-infected rats: its origin and biological meaning. Parasitology. 1999;119:221–226. [PubMed]
  • Korenaga M, Nawa Y, Mimori T, Tada I. Effects of preintestinal larval antigenic stimuli on the generation of intestinal immunity in Strongyloides ratti infection in rats. J Parasitol. 1983;69:78–82. [PubMed]
  • Li X, Massey HC, Nolan TJ, Schad GA, Kraus K, Sundaram M, Lok JB. Successful transgenesis of the parasitic nematode Strongyloides stercoralis requires endogenous non-coding control elements. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:671–679. [PubMed]
  • Lim S, Katz K, Krajden S, Fuksa M, Keystone JS, Kain KC. Complicated and fatal Strongyloides infection in Canadians: risk factors, diagnosis and management. CMAJ. 2004;171:479–484. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Little MD. Comparative morphology of six species of Strongyloides (Nematoda) and redefinition of the genus. J Parasitol. 1966;52:69–84. [PubMed]
  • Lyons ET. Vertical transmission of nematodes: Emphasis on Uncinaria lucasi in northern fur seals and Strongyloides westeri in equids. J Helmin Soc Wash. 1994;61:169–178.
  • Mackerras MJ. Strongyloides and Parastrongyloides (Nematoda: Rhabdiasoidea) in Australian marsupials. Aust J Zool. 1959;7:87–104.
  • Mansfield LS, Niamatali S, Bhopale V, Volk S, Smith G, Lok JB, Genta RM, Schad GA. Strongyloides stercoralis: maintenance of exceedingly chronic infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996;55:617–624. [PubMed]
  • Massey HC, Castelletto ML, Bhopale VM, Schad GA, Lok JB. Sst-tgh-1 from Strongyloides stercoralis encodes a proposed ortholog of daf-7 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;142:116–120. [PubMed]
  • Minematsu T, Mimori T, Tanaka M, Tada I. The effect of fatty-acids on the developmental direction of Strongyloides ratti first stage larvae. J Helminthol. 1989;63:13–17. [PubMed]
  • Mitreva M, McCarter JP, Martin J, Dante M, Wylie T, Chiapelli B, Pape D, Clifton SW, Nutman TB, Waterson RH. Comparative genomics of gene expression in the parasitic and free-living nematodes Strongyloides stercoralis and Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res. 2004;14:209–220. [PubMed]
  • Moncol DJ, Grice MJ. Transmammary passage of Strongyloides papillosus in the goat and sheep. Proc Helmin Soc Wash. 1974;41:1–4.
  • Moncol DJ, Triantaphyllou AC. Strongyloides ransomi: Factors influencing the in vitro development of the free-living generation. J Parasitol. 1978;64:220–225. [PubMed]
  • Morgan DO. Parastrongyloides winchesi gen. et sp nov A remarkable new nematode parasite of the mole and the shrew. J Helminthol. 1928;6:79–86.
  • Nolan TJ, Katz FF. Transmammary transmission of Strongyloides venezuelensis (Nematoda) in rats. Proc Helmin Soc Wash. 1981;48:8–12.
  • Pampiglione S, Ricciardi ML. Geographic distribution of Strongyloides fuelleborni in humans in tropical Africa. Parasitologia. 1972;14:329–338.
  • Parkinson J, Mitreva M, Whitton C, Thompson M, Daub J, Martin J, Schmid R, Hall N, Waterson RH, McCarter JP, Blaxter ML. A transcriptomic analysis of the phylum Nematoda. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1259–1267. [PubMed]
  • Ren P, Lim C-S, Johnsen R, Albert PS, Pilgrim D, Riddle DL. Control of C. elegans larval development by neuronal expression of a TGF-β homolog. Science. 1996;274:1389–1391. [PubMed]
  • Riddle DL, Albert PS. In: Genetic and environmental regulation of dauer larva developmentC. elegans. Riddle DL II, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR, editors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997.
  • Schad GA. Morphology and life history of Strongyloides stercoralis. In: Grove DI, editor. Strongyloidiasis a major roundworm infection of man. London: Taylor and Francis; 1989. pp. 85–104.
  • Shoop WL, Corkum KC. Maternal transmission by Alaria marcianae (Trematoda) and the concept of amphiparatenesis. J Parasitol. 1987;73:110–115. [PubMed]
  • Shoop WL, Michael BF, Eary CH, Haines HW. Transmammary transmission of Strongyloides stercoralis in dogs. J Parasitol. 2002;88:536–539. [PubMed]
  • Speare R. Identification of species of Strongyloides. In: Grove DI, editor. Strongyloidiasis a major roundworm infection of man. London: Taylor and Francis; 1989. pp. 11–84.
  • Stephenson LS, Latham MC, Ottesen EA. Malnutrition and parasitic helminth infections. Parasitology. 2000;121:S23–S38. [PubMed]
  • Stewart TB, Stone WM, Marti OG. Strongyloides ransomi: prenatal and transmammary infection of pigs of sequential litters from dams experimentally exposed as weanlings. Am J Vet Res. 1976;37:541–544. [PubMed]
  • Stone W, Smith FW. Infection of mammalian hosts by milk-borne nematode larvae: a review. Exp Parasitol. 1973;34:306–312. [PubMed]
  • Thompson FJ, Mitreva M, Barker GLA, Martin J, Waterston RH, McCarter JP, Viney ME. An expressed sequence tag analysis of the life-cycle of the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;142:32–46. [PubMed]
  • Thompson FJ, Barker GLA, Hughes L, Wilkes CP, Coghill J, Viney ME. A microarray analysis of gene expression in the free-living stages of the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:157–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tindall NR, Wilson PAG. Criteria for a proof of migration routes of immature parasites inside hosts exemplified by studies of Strongyloides ratti in the rat. Parasitology. 1988;96:551–563. [PubMed]
  • Triantaphyllou AC, Moncol DJ. Cytology, reproduction, and sex determination of Strongyloides ransomi and S.papillosus. J Parasitol. 1977;63:961–973. [PubMed]
  • Turner SA, Maclean JD, Fleckenstein L, Greenaway C. Parenteral administration of ivermectin in a patient with disseminated strongyloidiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:911–914. [PubMed]
  • Viney ME. A genetic analysis of reproduction in Strongyloides ratti. Parasitology. 1994;109:511–515. [PubMed]
  • Viney ME. Developmental switching in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 1996;263:201–208. [PubMed]
  • Viney ME, Ashford RW. The ultrastructure of the peri-vulval region of Strongyloides cebus. J Helminthol. 1990;64:23–28. [PubMed]
  • Viney ME, Matthews BE, Walliker D. On the biological and biochemical nature of cloned populations of Strongyloides ratti. J Helminthol. 1992;66:45–52. [PubMed]
  • Viney ME, Matthews BE, Walliker D. Mating in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti: Proof of genetic exchange. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 1993;254:213–219. [PubMed]
  • Viney ME. Environmental control of nematode life cycles. In: Lewis EE, Campbell JF, Sukhdeo MVK, editors. The Behavioural Ecology of Parasites. Oxford: CABI Publishing; 2002. pp. 111–128.
  • Viney ME, Thompson FJ, Crook M. TGF-β and the evolution of nematode parasitism. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:1473–1475. [PubMed]
  • Viney ME, Steer MD, Wilkes CP. The reversibility of constraints on size and fecundity in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Parasitology. 2006;133:477–483. [PubMed]
  • Wilkes CP, Thompson FJ, Gardner MP, Paterson S, Viney ME. The effect of the host immune response on the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Parasitology. 2004;128:661–669. [PubMed]
  • Yamada M, Matsuda S, Nakazawa M, Arizono N. Species-specific differences in heterogonic development of serially transferred free-living generations of Strongyloides planiceps and Strongyloides stercoralis. J Parasitol. 1991;77:592–594. [PubMed]