Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosgenPLoS GeneticsSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Genet. 2011 May; 7(5): e1002054.
Published online 2011 May 5. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.1002054
PMCID: PMC3088722

A Latent Pro-Survival Function for the Mir-290-295 Cluster in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Grace X. Y. Zheng,# 1 , 2 , 3 , ¤a Arvind Ravi,# 1 , 3 , 4 J. Mauro Calabrese, 1 , 3 , ¤b Lea A. Medeiros, 3 , 5 Oktay Kirak, 5 Lucas M. Dennis, 3 , 5 , ¤c Rudolf Jaenisch, 3 , 5 Christopher B. Burge, 2 , 3 and Phillip A. Sharp 1 , 3 , *
Michael T. McManus, Editor


MicroRNAs (miRNAs) post-transcriptionally regulate the expression of thousands of distinct mRNAs. While some regulatory interactions help to maintain basal cellular functions, others are likely relevant in more specific settings, such as response to stress. Here we describe such a role for the mir-290-295 cluster, the dominant miRNA cluster in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Examination of a target list generated from bioinformatic prediction, as well as expression data following miRNA loss, revealed strong enrichment for apoptotic regulators, two of which we validated directly: Caspase 2, the most highly conserved mammalian caspase, and Ei24, a p53 transcriptional target. Consistent with these predictions, mESCs lacking miRNAs were more likely to initiate apoptosis following genotoxic exposure to gamma irradiation or doxorubicin. Knockdown of either candidate partially rescued this pro-apoptotic phenotype, as did transfection of members of the mir-290-295 cluster. These findings were recapitulated in a specific mir-290-295 deletion line, confirming that they reflect miRNA functions at physiological levels. In contrast to the basal regulatory roles previously identified, the pro-survival phenotype shown here may be most relevant to stressful gestations, where pro-oxidant metabolic states induce DNA damage. Similarly, this cluster may mediate chemotherapeutic resistance in a neoplastic context, making it a useful clinical target.

Author Summary

In this study, we were interested in learning more about the roles of microRNAs—small segments of RNA that help turn off genes—during early development. By studying mouse embryonic stem cells, a unique cell type that can give rise to all adult tissues, we found that a number of genes related to cell survival appeared to be affected by global microRNA loss. Interestingly, these changes in gene expression did not lead to large increases in cell death during normal cell growth, but rather became apparent when cells were treated with agents that cause DNA damage, like the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin and gamma irradiation. Our results suggest that these microRNAs may provide robustness for mammalian development, ensuring proper development despite variations in blood flow and oxygen tension, known to cause DNA damage. Given that certain cancers share features of the embryonic state, including rapid proliferation and lack of differentiation, our results also suggest that the re-expression of these microRNAs in tumors may confer resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs.


MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous ~22 nt RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. In animals, the ability of miRNAs to accomplish this regulation depends on complementarity between mature miRNA sequences and their mRNA targets. Most commonly, partial binding of miRNAs leads to destabilization of mRNA transcripts and/or inhibition of productive translation, and in rare cases perfect complementarity instead causes target cleavage. Both in vitro experiments and bioinformatics have shown that matches to positions 2–7 of the miRNA, referred to as the miRNA “seed,” are generally required for effective miRNA-directed mRNA downregulation [1], [2].

The roles of miRNAs in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) have been of particular interest, as this knowledge may shed light on key aspects of mammalian development and generate useful insights into reprogramming and cancer, both of which recapitulate aspects of an ESC expression state [3], [4]. In addition, the survival of mESCs in the absence of Dicer (Dcr), the key RNase III enzyme that generates mature miRNAs, makes them a unique model system for dissecting miRNA function [5], [6]. Several large-scale sequencing datasets [7], [8], [9] have revealed that the mir-290-295 cluster constitutes the dominant miRNA population in mESCs, giving rise to about 50% of all reads in these cells (Table S1). Many of the miRNAs in this cluster share the hexamer seed ‘AAGUGC,’ which is also expressed at much lower levels by the mir-302 and mir-467 clusters, contributing less than 5% of total reads (Table S2). A similar percent contribution to total miRNA levels comes from the miR-17-92 family, which contains the shifted seed ‘AAAGUG,’ and therefore may share some common targets (Table S2) [7], [8], [9]. Given the abundance of the mir-290-295 cluster and these related sequences, much of mESC miRNA physiology is likely to be a function of this dominant seed sequence.

Within the mir-290-295 cluster, the ‘AAGUGC’ seed is found in miR-290-3p, miR-291a-3p, miR-291b-3p, miR-292-3p, miR-294, and miR-295. Consistent with their high expression, these miRNAs (which we shall refer to as the mir-295 cluster) have been linked to a number of functions in ES cells including maintenance of pluripotency and proliferation. For instance, miR-290-295 miRNAs have been shown to target Rbl2, which controls the expression of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b [10], [11], suggesting a role for this miRNA cluster in regulating de novo DNA methylation. In addition, miR-290-295 miRNAs have been found to accelerate cell proliferation by promoting the G1 to S phase transition through targets such as p21 and Lats2 [12]. However, additional roles for this cluster remain to be elucidated.

Using a combination of target prediction data with microarrays of mESCs before (Dcr WT) and after (Dcr KO) miRNA loss, as well as before (295 WT) and after (295 KO) specific deletion of the mir-295 cluster (Medeiros et al., manuscript in preparation), we have identified novel targets of the mir-295 cluster in ES cells. Initial analysis suggested strong enrichment of targets involved in apoptosis, a function that to date has not been linked to ES-cell specific miRNAs. Through gain and loss of function studies, we show that miR-290-295 miRNAs indeed serve a protective function in preventing mESC apoptosis during exposure to genotoxic stress. This protective effect appears to be mediated in part by direct repression of two novel targets, Caspase 2 and Ei24. As activation of these targets is dependent on DNA damage, we propose that their regulation may be particularly relevant during physiological stress in embryonic development. In addition, given prior indications that these two genes act as tumor suppressors, misexpression of this cluster in the context of cancer may promote resistance to standard genotoxic therapeutics.


Predicted targets of the mir-295 cluster are enriched in pathways regulating apoptosis

In order to identify additional endogenous targets of mESC miRNAs, we performed expression profiling of mESCs following Cre recombinase-mediated Dcr deletion using a previously characterized floxed Dcr mESC line [13], [14], [15]. As Dcr deletion leads to slower proliferation [6], [12], acute loss was examined in a polyclonal population, averaging over potential clonal variants and enriching for initial miRNA-mediated derepression rather than subsequent compensatory changes. Indeed, expression profiling from 3 biological replicates taken 5 days following deletion, a time point by which cells were predominantly Dcr null and a majority of miRNAs were lost (Figure 1A and 1B), showed better clustering than 3 chronic deletion cell lines, as indicated by higher Pearson correlation coefficients (Figure S1). To confirm that targets of the mir-295 cluster show a transcriptome-wide signature in this dataset, we calculated a cumulative density function (cdf) plot comparing expression differences for the set of all mir-295 cluster targets as determined by Targetscan 5.1 [16]. Relative to a control set of genes (control) matched for 3' UTR length, dinucleotide composition, and expression level, the mir-295 cluster target set (targets) was more derepressed upon Dcr loss (Figure 1C). An even larger derepression was seen for conserved mir-295 cluster targets (conserved targets), suggesting further enrichment of genuine targets in this set (Figure 1C). This observation supports the utility of these expression data for target discovery.

Figure 1
Acute Dicer deletion and specific mir-295 cluster deletion show global target derepression signatures.

To better understand the global effects of miRNA loss in ESCs, we next performed Gene Ontology (GO) analysis on an initial candidate set. Enrichment in specific GO categories was tested for all genes that increased on Dcr loss (defined as ≥1.2 fold up-regulation). The top statistically significant categories included “Regulators of Apoptosis” and “Cell Cycle” (p = 2.1e−8 and p = 5.6e−5, respectively). We further refined our candidate list using available array data from the 295 KO line, which also showed cdf plot signature changes for mir-295 cluster targets (Figure 1C) (Medeiros et. al., manuscript in preparation). In all, 807 candidates were identified as Targetscan-predicted targets of the cluster that showed at least a 1.2 fold up-regulation in knockout populations from both datasets (Figure 2A, Table S3). Over 40% of upregulated transcripts were shared between the Dcr KO and 295 KO lines, consistent with the finding that the mir-295 cluster contributes around half of all miRNAs in ES cells. The fact that this overlap is not even greater may be due to direct and indirect effects of non-AAGUGC seeds, as there is significantly more overlap – in fact, closer to 70% – between the two data sets when considering only those genes that are Targetscan-predicted AAGUGC targets (p<0.001, Fischer’s exact test).

Figure 2
Microarray data and Targetscan predictions identify candidate miR-295 targets in mESCs.

Several candidate target genes were selected for further examination based on their degree of upregulation in Dcr KO and 295 KO cells, as well as their functional annotations. The tested targets span a range of biological functions and processes, from cell cycle regulators Lats2 and p21 to immunological signal transduction components Irf9 and Irak3. Their 3' UTRs were cloned into luciferase constructs, and expression levels between Dcr WT and Dcr KO cells were evaluated (Figure 2B). All candidates tested displayed at least mild repression relative to a control construct lacking miRNA target sites, ranging from strong (~5-fold) to modest (~30%) down-regulation. The magnitude of repression for the previously identified miR-295 targets Lats2 and p21 was comparable to that observed previously [12]. Additional transfection studies confirmed that repression could be conferred specifically by miR-295 in a Dcr KO background (Figure S2). These in vitro results support the enrichment of our candidate list for true miR-295 targets.

Caspase 2 and Ei24, key apoptotic mediators, are direct targets of the mir-295 cluster

We chose to more closely examine one of the most strongly down-regulated reporter targets, Caspase 2 (Casp2), along with Ei24, as these targets could provide a novel link between ESC-specific microRNAs and cell survival. Casp2, an initiator of apoptosis in response to genotoxic stress [17], has four AAGUGC binding sites in its 3' UTR. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis demonstrated an approximately 5-fold increase in Casp2 transcript levels in Dcr KO cells, consistent with the degree of derepression observed with the luciferase reporter assay (Figure 3A). This observation indicates that the majority of miRNA repression likely occurs at the level of transcript stability. In support of the reporter assay, Dcr KO cells showed a comparable increase in Casp2 at the protein level, which could be partially rescued by transfection of either miR-295, miR-467a (which shares the same hexamer seed), or a Casp2 siRNA, but not by siRNAs against other unrelated targets (Figure 3B). Transfection of miR-295 also strongly repressed an intact Casp2 reporter in these cells, but not a reporter in which the four target sites were mutated (Figure 3C). Combinatorial mutagenesis revealed that repression was not conferred equally by these four sites, as much of the repression was lost by mutation of the first two sites alone (Figure 3D). Taken together, these data suggest that direct miRNA-mediated repression of Casp2 leads to approximately 5-fold repression, making it one of the most potently repressed mir-295 cluster targets identified to date.

Figure 3
The pro-apoptotic genes Caspase 2 (Casp2) and Ei24 are direct targets of the mir-295 cluster.

We additionally characterized the novel target Ei24, which has also been implicated in apoptosis. Originally identified as a direct p53 transcriptional target that binds Bcl2 [18], [19], the Ei24 3' UTR contains one 7mer miR-295 site. The 3' UTR of Ei24 fused to a luciferase reporter conferred approximately 2-fold repression in Dcr WT cells relative to Dcr KO cells, an effect that could be restored following transfection of miR-295 (Figure 3C). Notably, repression was lost upon mutation of the seed site, confirming that Ei24 is a direct target.

Mir-295 cluster miRNAs promote survival of ES cells during genotoxic stress

Based on these repression data as well as the earlier informatic predictions, we tested whether mir-295 cluster miRNAs could modulate apoptosis in mESCs. The basal apoptosis rates of Dcr WT and KO ES cells in a 24 h period were compared by staining them with antibodies against cleaved Caspase 3 (Casp3) and then analyzing cells by flow cytometry. Under these conditions, only modest basal apoptotic rates were observed, with Dcr KO ES cells showing a slightly higher apoptosis rate than Dcr WT cells (Figure 4A, Figure S3A). Given that ESCs are highly sensitive to DNA damage [20] and both validated targets have been implicated in the DNA damage response, we hypothesized that the mir-295 cluster may be specifically protective in the context of genotoxic stress. To test this, we first examined the effect of exposing WT and Dcr KO cells to gamma irradiation or doxorubicin. Gamma irradiation induces DNA damage and activates ATM and p53, as does doxorubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor [21]. These signals lead to activation of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway and result in the cleavage of Casp3 [22]. We were able to confirm this cleavage product by Western blot in our cell culture system, as well as cleavage of Nanog, a previously reported Casp3 target [23] (Figure S5A). We also observed a decrease in Casp2 levels and the appearance of the previously described 35kD cleavage product [24], confirming its activation in our system (Figure S5B). Because this band was specific to DNA damage induction, the upregulation of Casp2 in Dcr KO cells appears to be insufficient to generate autocleavage. Both Dcr WT and KO ES cells showed minimal Casp3 activation immediately after 5-Gy gamma-irradiation, in line with previous descriptions of a 1–2 h lag phase in its activation (Figure 4A) [25]. However, there was a notable difference in their responses 24 h after the treatment (and to a lesser extent 10 h after treatment, Figure S4A); while 10% of WT cells became apoptotic, more than 30% of the Dcr KO cells exhibited Casp3 activity (Figure 4A). Similar results were seen using Annexin V staining, a complementary assay for detecting early apoptosis (Figure S3C). Importantly, mature miRNA levels from the mir-295 cluster were unchanged by these stressors (Figure S3D). Therefore, it appears that loss of mature miRNAs leads to an enhancement of apoptosis in the presence of DNA damage.

Figure 4
Downregulation of Casp2 and Ei24 partially rescues the increased apoptotic rate of Dcr KO cells following genotoxic stress.

To examine whether the miR-295 targets modulated apoptosis, we transfected a series of siRNAs into Dcr KO cells and evaluated cell death following irradiation. The difference in Casp3 activation between 0 and 24 h timepoints was calculated in order to account for differences in transfection-specific toxicity (Figure S6A and S6B). Relative to control siRNAs, transfection of miR-290-3p or miR-295 drastically decreased the apoptosis response of Dcr KO cells to gamma irradiation (Figure 4B, Figure S6A and S6B). The reduction in apoptosis is specific to the AAGUGC seed, as seed mutants failed to rescue Dcr KO ES cells from apoptosis. When we applied siRNAs specific to each validated target, or to Bim, a well-characterized proapoptotic factor, cells exhibited a decrease of 5–10% in Casp3 activation 24 h after irradiation, a level similar to mir-295 cluster miRNA overexpression (Figure 4B, Figure S6A and S6B). Similar findings were obtained when cells were treated with 100 nM –300 nM doxorubicin, suggesting that the identified pathways are relevant to DNA damage in general (Figure 4C and 4D, Figure S4B, Figure S6C and S6D).

Specific deletion of the mir-295 cluster enhances susceptibility to apoptosis upon DNA damage

Because deletion of Dcr involves global miRNA loss, and three additional clusters containing the same or similar hexamer seed, mir-302, mir-467, and mir-17-92, are expressed in ESCs (Table S2), we examined the 295 KO line to determine the specific contribution of the mir-295 cluster to cell survival. Genetic deletion offers the best insight into physiological function as it avoids overexpression artifacts of exogenous miRNAs or toxicity effects of miRNA inhibitors. This system also avoids confounding by alternative miRNA-independent roles for Dcr itself in cell survival, as have been recently reported in C. elegans [26]. We first re-examined the reporter constructs for Casp2 and Ei24 in the 295 KO ESC line relative to its wild-type counterpart. In this context, the Casp2 reporter was derepressed approximately half as strongly as it was in Dcr KO cells, suggesting that the miR-302 and miR-467a families of miRNAs incompletely compensate for loss of the mir-295 cluster (Figure 5A). This partial derepression in the mir-295 cluster deletion probably reflects the quantitative change in the total level of AAGUGC seed miRNAs, as exogenous miR-295 could further repress Casp2 protein levels (Figure 5B). We next exploited 295 KO ES cells to determine whether these cells had an increase in apoptosis upon exposure to DNA damaging agents. 295 WT and KO ES cells were irradiated and the level of cleaved Casp3 activity was measured 0 and 24 h after treatment (Figure 5C, Figure S3B). As expected, 295 KO cells were much more sensitive to irradiation than their WT counterparts (Figure 5C). Again, overexpression of two miRNAs in the cluster, miR-290-3p and miR-295, reduced the rate of apoptosis (Figure 5D, Figure S7A and S7B). In addition, knockdown of the validated targets Casp2 or Ei24, or the pathway component Bim, partially rescued cells from apoptosis caused by irradiation (Figure 5D, Figure S7A and S7B). We repeated these experiments with 100 nM doxorubicin as before, obtaining similar results (Figure 5E and 5F, Figure S7C and S7D). Therefore, deletion and restoration of mir-295 cluster miRNAs recapitulate the modulation of apoptosis rates seen in a Dcr null context.

Figure 5
Loss of the mir-295 cluster derepresses Casp 2 and Ei24 3' UTRs and enhances sensitivity to DNA damaging agents.


Here, we provide the first demonstration that the mir-295 cluster can suppress apoptosis in mESCs following exposure to the genotoxic stressors ionizing irradiation and doxorubicin. Initially suggested by an informatic comparison of global expression data following Dicer loss, the link between ESC miRNAs and cell death may act in part through the novel targets Casp2 and Ei24. In the case of Casp2, this appears to occur through multiple seed match sites in the 3' UTR leading to a roughly 5 fold reduction in expression, while for Ei24, targeting is achieved through just a single complementary site conferring approximately a 2 fold repression.

Although the exact functions of these two mediators are still emerging, multiple lines of evidence suggest that they are important in cell survival. Initial studies of Casp2 knockout mice showed increased numbers of oocytes suggesting resistance to cell death, which was confirmed by their decreased sensitivity to doxorubicin [27]. Subsequent studies have extended this pro-survival phenotype of Casp2 loss to include a number of tissues and DNA damaging agents [28]. Ei24, which was originally identified in a screen for etoposide-induced transcripts, has been shown to promote cell death by binding and sequestering Bcl2 [19].

Interestingly, these genes as well as several previously identified miR-295 family targets are known to be directly or indirectly associated with p53. Indeed, Pathway Analysis of well-characterized miR-295 targets brought up a single significant network (p = 10−14), “Cell Death, Cell Cycle, Cellular Function and Maintenance,” which prominently featured p53 (Figure 6). Activation of Casp2 can occur through a protein complex in which it associates with the p53 target PIDD [28]. Ei24 itself is a p53 transcriptional target, identified as one of 14 genes induced by adenoviral transfection of p53 into a p53-null colon cancer cell line [19]. We additionally confirmed two previously identified miR-295 targets, p21 (also known as Cdkn1a) and Lats2 [29]. In the case of p21, direct activation by p53 promotes cell cycle arrest at the G1/S phase [30]. Lats2, while also induced by p53, exists in a positive feedback loop with p53 in which it binds and inhibits Mdm2, thereby activating p53 [31]. Thus, miR-295 family miRNAs target a number of p53 associated genes and in all cases antagonizing p53 activation, consistent with the protective effect we have identified here.

Figure 6
Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of miR-295 targets.

Like p53, the mir-295 cluster affects both arms of cellular proliferation, namely cell death and cell cycle progression [12], [29]. Unlike cell cycle progression, however, the anti-apoptotic role is likely to have the greatest developmental consequences following DNA damage, induced physiologically by oxidative stress or metabolites. Interestingly, even simply ex vivo cell passage may be sufficient to induce a low level of stress, as evidenced by the slightly higher apoptotic rate of Dicer null cells under basal culture. In their pro-survival capacity, these miRNAs may confer robustness during embryonic development, as has been demonstrated in Drosophila. For instance, miR-7 has been shown to participate in a complex network of feedback loops to ensure proper photoreceptor cell development despite temperature fluctuations in development [32]. Similarly, miR-263a/b appear to prevent patterning defects in bristle formation, again consistent with the notion that they promote the fidelity of developmental trajectories [32], [33]. Early phenotypic data from mir-290-295 KO mice suggests an incompletely penetrant gestational phenotype (Medeiros et. al., manuscript in preparation), supporting the model that loss of this cluster is tolerated in certain developmental scenarios, perhaps including those with limited stressors during gestation.

Beyond regulating development, the miRNAs described here may also have important consequences for cancer, as both Casp2 and Ei24 are considered tumor suppressors. In the case of Casp2, this has been best demonstrated in the Eu-myc lymphoma model, where loss of even a single copy of Casp2 can accelerate malignant transformation [34]. Similarly, Ei24 is found in a region that shows frequent loss-of-heterozygosity in solid tumors, and its loss has been associated with increased breast cancer invasiveness [19]. In addition, knockdown of Ei24 in mouse fibroblasts or human breast cancer cell lines leads to increased resistance against etoposide-induced apoptosis [19], [35]. Consistent with these findings, the mir-295 cluster itself has been speculated to be an “oncomir” cluster, as overexpression of its human homolog, the mir-371-373 cluster, has been found in various human tumors [36], [37], [38] and may promote malignant transformation [39]. Given our findings, we hypothesize that these miRNAs may have a survival promoting function with dual effects, helping cells navigate physiological stresses during development, and helping cancer cells maintain viability in the face of genotoxic chemotherapeutic agents.

In conclusion, these data expand our understanding of ESC miRNA function, linking the ES cell specific miR-295 family to key players in cell death. Further, this analysis reveals a complex relationship between embryonic stem cell miRNA regulation and p53 activation.

Materials and Methods

ES cell culture

Feeder-free Dicer1flox/flox and Dicer1−/− mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) were generated and maintained on gelatin as described previously [40]. mESCs cells containing a floxed and excised mir-295 cluster were generated in a similar manner and will be described in an upcoming publication (Medeiros et. al., manuscript in preparation).

Oligos and siRNAs used in all the experiments

See Table S4.

Generation of luciferase constructs, mESC transfection, and luciferase assays

MicroRNA mediated repression of each candidate gene was tested by cloning PCR amplified products corresponding to the entire 3' UTR downstream of a pRL-CMV Renilla luciferase reporter as described previously [41]. Nucleotides 5–7 of Casp2, Bim, and Ei24 binding sites were mutated by Quickchange site-directed mutagenesis. Digests were performed using either XhoI or SalI to give the 5' site and ApaI or NotI to give the 3' site. Firefly luciferase (pGL3) was used as a transfection control. Data shown are summaries of three or more independent trials. 24 hours before transfection 1e5 mESC cells were plated/well of gelatinized 24-well plate. Cells were transfected with 2 µl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), 0.1 µg of CMV-GFP plasmid (Invitrogen), 0.7 µg of pWS (carrier plasmid), and 50 nM siRNAs in 300 µl of Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). 4 hours after transfection, transfection mix was removed from cells and replaced with ESC media. 24 hours after transfection, cells were lysed with 1X Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega) and Dual luciferase was measured using Dual Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Northern Blot analysis

Total RNA was isolated from ES cells with or without acute Dicer deletion using Trizol (Invitrogen), following the standard protocol. Approximately 50 µg of each RNA was loaded onto a 15% denaturing MOPS gel, according to the Northern Blot protocol outlined previously [42]. Membranes were probed for miR-292 and exposed to a phosphoimager before scanning. Prior to hybridizing with a different probe, membranes were stripped by incubating the membrane in boiling 0.1% SDS for 30 minutes and loss of signal was confirmed prior to rehybridization.

Western Blot analysis

24 hours after transfection with short RNAs, Dicer1−/−, Dicerflox/flox, miR-290-295−/−, or miR-290-295flox/flox cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, in pH 7.4 PBS) containing protease inhibitors. 30–50 µg lysate was loaded onto 8–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) and wet-transferred at 4°C to Westran PVDF membranes for 2 h at 70V. After 1 h blocking at room temperature in 5% milk-TBST, membranes were probed overnight at 4°C with 1[ratio]2000 mouse anti-vinculin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or 1[ratio]200 rat anti-Caspase 2 (Millipore, 10C6). After 2×10 min. TBST washes, membranes were probed for 1 h at room temperature with 1[ratio]2000 corresponding hRP-conjugated secondary, washed an additional 2×10 min. in TBST, and visualized using Western Lightning Plus ECL (PerkinElmer).


Trizol (Qiagen) was used to extract RNA from Dicer1flox/flox and Dicer1−/− cells. A Superscript III kit (Invitrogen) was used to reverse transcribe 1 µg RNA following DNAse treatment with the Turbo-DNA free kit (Ambion), and real time PCR was performed with the primer sequences listed, using beta actin for normalization.

Transfection and Casp3 assays

24 hours before transfection 2e5 mESC cells were plated/well of gelatinized 12-well plates. Cells were transfected with 4 µl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), 0.2 µg pCAGGS-mCherry plasmid, 1.4 µg of pWS, and 50 nM of siRNA in 600 µl of Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). 4 hours after transfection, transfection mix was removed from cells and replaced with ESC media. 24 hours after transfection, cells were exposed to 5-Gy gamma radiation or 100 nM doxorubicin. Immediately after exposure, one plate of cells were trypsinized and fixed with 1× BD Perm buffer. Cells were stained with Rabbit Anti-Casp3 antibody (BD Biosciences) at 1[ratio]100 for 20 min. at room temperature. Following washing, cells were incubated with Alexa-488-conjugated secondary antibody (diluted 1[ratio]250) (Invitrogen) for 60 min. at room temperature, washed, and resuspended in BD FACS buffer containing 1[ratio]5000 Hoechst stain. 24 hours after the treatment, another plate of cells was trypsinized and treated with the same protocol for FACS analysis.

Casp3 assays were also performed on Dcr KO and WT mESCs without transfection. 24 hours before collecting cells for the 0 h time point for Casp3 assay, 2e5 mESC were plated/well of gelatinized 6-well plates. In the context of genotoxic stress, 4e5 mESCs were plated/well of gelatinized 6-well plates. 24 hours after plating, cells were treated with 5-Gy radiation or 100 nM doxorubicin. Casp3 assays were performed at 0 h and 24 h after the treatment following the same protocol described above.

Annexin V assays

4e5 mESCs were plated/well of gelatinized 6-well plates. 24 h after plating, cells were exposed to 100 nM doxorubicin. Cells were trypsinized 0 h and 24 h after the treatment for Annexin V detection, following Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (BD Biosciences).

Microarray analysis

Microarray analysis was performed 5 days following transfection of Dicerflox/flox wild-type cells with either GFP alone or GFP and Cre recombinase, and data were analyzed using biological triplicates. Microarrays for the mir-295 cluster deletion were performed on two deletion and two wild-type lines independently derived. Spot replicates were condensed using geometric means.

The log fold change (LFC) value for Dcr WT/Dcr KO was defined as the difference between the mean log expression in Dcr WT cells and the mean log expression in Dcr KO cells. The conserved set of targets were downloaded from TargetScanMouse5.1 website ( To identify targets predicted for the AAGUGC seed family, we looked at all miRNAs that contain AAGUGC in their seed region. More specifically, they include “miR-291b-3p/519a/519b-3p/519c-3p”, “miR-290-3p/292-3p/467a”, “miR-467cd”, “miR-106/302”, and “miR-467b”. We excluded all the targets of “miR-302ac/520f”, as well as T1A 7mer targets of “miR-467b”, as they do not contain the 6-mer match to AAGUGC. Targets with top 10% of branch length scores were considered “conserved”.

Gene Ontology and Pathway analysis

Gene Set Analysis Toolkit ( was used to perform GO analysis. Targets and controls were generated as described in the text. Network data were analyzed through the use of Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (Ingenuity Systems, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was performed on the set of validated miR-295 targets to identify the most strongly associated canonical pathways.

Statistical analyses

All test statistics were calculated using R ( The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used because it does not assume normality of the underlying distributions. T-tests and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test using these data gave generally similar results.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Microarray data from polyclonal acute dicer deletion samples show better inter-sample correlation than data from clonal chronic dicer deletion lines. Biological triplicates were obtained for both 5 days post Dicer deletion (Acute 1-3) and over 1 month following Dicer deletion (Chronic 1-3), after which samples were normalized together. Pearson correlations for all pairwise comparisons within the two conditions are shown here.


Figure S2

Repression of predicted targets of the miR-295 cluster in Dcr WT and Dcr KO ES cells. Activity of luciferase reporters of predicted targets were assayed in WT, Dcr KO ES cells, as well as in Dcr KO ES cells after over expression of 20 nM miR-295. n≥2, and results are shown as mean ± S.E.M.


Figure S3

Comparison of WT and KO cells’ apoptosis response to stress. A. The percentage of cells expressing cleaved Caspase 3 (Casp3) in WT and Dcr KO ES cells under normal culturing conditions (0 and 24 hours after plating). B. The percentage of cells expressing cleaved Caspase 3 (Casp3) in 295 WT and 295 KO ES cells under normal culturing conditions (0 and 24 hours after plating). Cleaved Casp3 was assayed by flow cytometry, and was used to estimate apoptosis response. Apoptosis of KO cells is shown in black bars, and that of WT cells is shown in white bars. C. Annexin V positive cells were assayed by flow cytometry immediately or 24 h after exposure to 100 nM doxorubicin. n = 2, and results are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (standard error of the mean). D. Northern analysis for miR-295 in Dcr KO ES cells, WT ES cells, and WT ES cells 6 hours after 2 μM doxorubicin treatment.


Figure S4

Time course of WT and KO cells’ apoptosis response to stress. A. WT and Dcr KO ES cells were treated with 5-Gy radiation. Casp3 activity was assayed 0 h, 10 h, and 24 h after the treatment, and the differences in apoptosis rate (between 10 h and 0 h, and between 24 h and 0 h) are shown. Cleaved Casp3 was assayed by flow cytometry, and was used to estimate apoptosis response. Apoptosis rate of Dcr KO cells is shown in black bars, and that of WT cells is shown in white bars. n = 2, and results are shown as mean ± S.E.M. B. WT and Dcr KO cells were treated with 2 doses of doxorubicin (200 nM and 300 nM). Casp3 activity was assayed 0 h, 10 h, and 24 h after the treatment, and the differences in apoptosis rate (between 10 h and 0 h, and between 24 h and 0 h) are shown. n = 1 with 3 technical replicates, and results are shown as mean ± standard deviation.


Figure S5

Analysis of Caspase 2 and Caspase 3 cleavage upon DNA damage induction. A. Dcr KO cells treated with 2 μM doxorubicin for 6 hours. Blot was probed with an antibody specific for cleaved Caspase 3 and for its target, Nanog, before and after treatment. B. Dcr KO and Dcr WT cells following 2 μM doxorubicin treatment for 6 hours. Intact Caspase 2 (49 kD) and cleaved Caspase 2 (35 kD) are both shown.


Figure S6

Raw data of Dcr KO and WT cells’ apoptosis response after treatment of 5-Gy radiation or 100 nM doxorubicin. A. Dcr KO cells were treated with 5-Gy radiation 24 hours after transfection of 50 nM miR-295 or miR-290-3p. Caspase 3 activity was assayed 0 and 24 h after the treatment. Transfection of seed mutants and control siRNAs (50 nM) into Dcr KO cells, and overexpression of control siRNAs (50 nM) into WT cells served as controls. B. Dcr KO cells were treated with 5-Gy radiation 24 hours after transfection of 50 nM siRNAs against Bim, Casp2, and Ei24. Caspase-3 activity was assayed 0 and 24 h after the treatment. C,D. A similar series of experiments was performed in Dcr WT and Dcr KO cells using 100 nM doxorubicin. n ≥ 3 for all experiments. Results are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (standard error of the mean).


Figure S7

Raw data of 295 KO and 295 WT cells’ apoptosis response after treatment of 5-Gy radiation or 100 nM doxorubicin. A. 295 KO cells were treated with 5-Gy radiation 24 hours after transfection of 50 nM of miR-295 or miR-290-3p. Caspase 3 activity was assayed 0 and 24 h after the treatment. Transfection of seed mutants and control siRNAs (50 nM) into 295 KO cells, and overexpression of control siRNAs (50 nM) into 295 WT cells served as controls. B. 295 KO cells were treated with 5-Gy radiation 24 hours after transfection of 50 nM siRNAs against Bim, Casp2, and Ei24. Caspase-3 activity was assayed 0 and 24 h after the treatment. C,D. A similar series of experiments was performed in 295 WT and 295 KO cells using 100 nM doxorubicin. n ≥3 for all experiments. Results are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (standard error of the mean).


Table S1

Sequences and expression level of the mir-295 cluster in ES cells. The 6-mer seed is highlighted in bold. The cloning statistics were taken from previously published studies [7], [8], [9].


Table S2

Sequences and expression level of the mir-302, mir-467, and mir-17-92 clusters in ES cells. The 6-mer seed is highlighted in bold. The cloning statistics were taken from previously published studies [7], [8], [9].


Table S3

Predicted targets of the mir-295 cluster.


Table S4

Oligos and siRNAs used in all experiments.



We thank J. R. Neilson and A. Seila for experimental assistance and reagents, and members of the Jaenisch, Burge, and Sharp laboratories for helpful discussions.


The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

AR was funded by a Fannie and John Hertz Foundation Fellowship. This work was supported by NIH grant RO1-GM34277, NCI grant PO1-CA42063, and the NCI Cancer Center Support (core) grant P30-CA14051. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Grimson A, Farh KK, Johnston WK, Garrett-Engele P, Lim LP, et al. MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol Cell. 2007;27:91–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Nielsen CB, Shomron N, Sandberg R, Hornstein E, Kitzman J, et al. Determinants of targeting by endogenous and exogenous microRNAs and siRNAs. RNA. 2007;13:1894–1910. [PubMed]
3. Ben-Porath I, Thomson MW, Carey VJ, Ge R, Bell GW, et al. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat Genet. 2008;40:499–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R, Brambrink T, Ku M, et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature. 2007;448:318–324. [PubMed]
5. Kanellopoulou C, Muljo SA, Kung AL, Ganesan S, Drapkin R, et al. Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev. 2005;19:489–501. [PubMed]
6. Murchison EP, Partridge JF, Tam OH, Cheloufi S, Hannon GJ. Characterization of Dicer-deficient murine embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12135–12140. [PubMed]
7. Leung AGY, Bhutkar Arjun, Zheng GraceX, Bosson AndrewD, Nielsen CydneyB, Sharp PhillipA. Nat Struct Mol Bio; 2010. Genome-wide identification of Ago2 binding sites from mouse embryonic stem cells with and without mature microRNAs. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Ciaudo C, Servant N, Cognat V, Sarazin A, Kieffer E, et al. Highly dynamic and sex-specific expression of microRNAs during early ES cell differentiation. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000620. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Babiarz JE, Ruby JG, Wang Y, Bartel DP, Blelloch R. Mouse ES cells express endogenous shRNAs, siRNAs, and other Microprocessor-independent, Dicer-dependent small RNAs. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2773–2785. [PubMed]
10. Benetti R, Gonzalo S, Jaco I, Munoz P, Gonzalez S, et al. A mammalian microRNA cluster controls DNA methylation and telomere recombination via Rbl2-dependent regulation of DNA methyltransferases. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:268–279. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Sinkkonen L, Hugenschmidt T, Berninger P, Gaidatzis D, Mohn F, et al. MicroRNAs control de novo DNA methylation through regulation of transcriptional repressors in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:259–267. [PubMed]
12. Wang Y, Baskerville S, Shenoy A, Babiarz JE, Baehner L, et al. Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs regulate the G1-S transition and promote rapid proliferation. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1478–1483. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Harfe BD, McManus MT, Mansfield JH, Hornstein E, Tabin CJ. The RNaseIII enzyme Dicer is required for morphogenesis but not patterning of the vertebrate limb. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:10898–10903. [PubMed]
14. Calabrese JM, Sharp PA. Characterization of the short RNAs bound by the P19 suppressor of RNA silencing in mouse embryonic stem cells. RNA. 2006;12:2092–2102. [PubMed]
15. Leung AK, Calabrese JM, Sharp PA. Quantitative analysis of Argonaute protein reveals microRNA-dependent localization to stress granules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18125–18130. [PubMed]
16. Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 2009;19:92–105. [PubMed]
17. Li J, Yuan J. Caspases in apoptosis and beyond. Oncogene. 2008;27:6194–6206. [PubMed]
18. Gu Z, Flemington C, Chittenden T, Zambetti GP. ei24, a p53 response gene involved in growth suppression and apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:233–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Zhao X, Ayer RE, Davis SL, Ames SJ, Florence B, et al. Apoptosis factor EI24/PIG8 is a novel endoplasmic reticulum-localized Bcl-2-binding protein which is associated with suppression of breast cancer invasiveness. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2125–2129. [PubMed]
20. Tichy ED, Stambrook PJ. DNA repair in murine embryonic stem cells and differentiated cells. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:1929–1936. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Nitiss JL. Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:338–350. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Fulda S, Debatin KM. Extrinsic versus intrinsic apoptosis pathways in anticancer chemotherapy. Oncogene. 2006;25:4798–4811. [PubMed]
23. Fujita J, Crane AM, Souza MK, Dejosez M, Kyba M, et al. Caspase activity mediates the differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:595–601. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Upton JP, Austgen K, Nishino M, Coakley KM, Hagen A, et al. Caspase-2 cleavage of BID is a critical apoptotic signal downstream of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:3943–3951. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Tyas L, Brophy VA, Pope A, Rivett AJ, Tavare JM. Rapid caspase-3 activation during apoptosis revealed using fluorescence-resonance energy transfer. EMBO Rep. 2000;1:266–270. [PubMed]
26. Nakagawa A, Shi Y, Kage-Nakadai E, Mitani S, Xue D. Caspase-dependent conversion of Dicer ribonuclease into a death-promoting deoxyribonuclease. Science. 2010;328:327–334. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Bergeron L, Perez GI, Macdonald G, Shi L, Sun Y, et al. Defects in regulation of apoptosis in caspase-2-deficient mice. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1304–1314. [PubMed]
28. Kumar S. Caspase 2 in apoptosis, the DNA damage response and tumour suppression: enigma no more? Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:897–903. [PubMed]
29. Wang Y, Blelloch R. Cell cycle regulation by MicroRNAs in embryonic stem cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4093–4096. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Abbas T, Dutta A. p21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:400–414. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Aylon Y, Michael D, Shmueli A, Yabuta N, Nojima H, et al. A positive feedback loop between the p53 and Lats2 tumor suppressors prevents tetraploidization. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2687–2700. [PubMed]
32. Li X, Cassidy JJ, Reinke CA, Fischboeck S, Carthew RW. A microRNA imparts robustness against environmental fluctuation during development. Cell. 2009;137:273–282. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Hilgers V, Bushati N, Cohen SM. Drosophila microRNAs 263a/b confer robustness during development by protecting nascent sense organs from apoptosis. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000396. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Ho LH, Taylor R, Dorstyn L, Cakouros D, Bouillet P, et al. A tumor suppressor function for caspase-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:5336–5341. [PubMed]
35. Mork CN, Faller DV, Spanjaard RA. Loss of putative tumor suppressor EI24/PIG8 confers resistance to etoposide. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:5440–5444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Rippe V, Dittberner L, Lorenz VN, Drieschner N, Nimzyk R, et al. The two stem cell microRNA gene clusters C19MC and miR-371-3 are activated by specific chromosomal rearrangements in a subgroup of thyroid adenomas. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Lee KH, Goan YG, Hsiao M, Lee CH, Jian SH, et al. MicroRNA-373 (miR-373) post-transcriptionally regulates large tumor suppressor, homolog 2 (LATS2) and stimulates proliferation in human esophageal cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:2529–2538. [PubMed]
38. Palmer RD, Murray MJ, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Abreu-Goodger C, et al. Malignant germ cell tumors display common microRNA profiles resulting in global changes in expression of messenger RNA targets. Cancer Res. 2010;70:2911–2923. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Voorhoeve PM, le Sage C, Schrier M, Gillis AJ, Stoop H, et al. A genetic screen implicates miRNA-372 and miRNA-373 as oncogenes in testicular germ cell tumors. Cell. 2006;124:1169–1181. [PubMed]
40. Calabrese JM, Seila AC, Yeo GW, Sharp PA. RNA sequence analysis defines Dicer's role in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:18097–18102. [PubMed]
41. Doench JG, Sharp PA. Specificity of microRNA target selection in translational repression. Genes Dev. 2004;18:504–511. [PubMed]
42. Seila AC, Calabrese JM, Levine SS, Yeo GW, Rahl PB, et al. Divergent transcription from active promoters. Science. 2008;322:1849–1851. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science