RSV-Induced Bronchial Epithelial Cell PD-L1 Expression Inhibits CD8+ T Cell Nonspecific Antiviral Activity

doi:10.1093/infdis/jiq020

J Infect Dis. 2011 January 1; 203(1): 85–94.

PMCID: PMC3086441

Copyright © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

RSV-Induced Bronchial Epithelial Cell PD-L1 Expression Inhibits CD8⁺ T Cell Nonspecific Antiviral Activity

Aurica G. Telcian,¹ Vasile Laza-Stanca,¹^a Michael R. Edwards,¹ James A. Harker,¹^b Hongwei Wang,¹^c Nathan W. Bartlett,¹ Patrick Mallia,^1,² Mihnea T. Zdrenghea,¹^d Tatiana Kebadze,¹ Anthony J. Coyle,³ Peter J.M. Openshaw,^1,² Luminita A. Stanciu,^1,¹ and Sebastian L. Johnston^1,^2,¹

¹Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, MRC and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma and Centre for Respiratory Infection, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, United Kingdom

²Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

³Department of Autoimmunity and Inflammation, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland

Current affiliations: ^aDepartment of Microbiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

^bDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California

^cMedical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

^dDepartment of Haematology, Oncologic Institute, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Corresponding author.

Reprints or correspondence: Dr Sebastian L Johnston, Professor of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK (Email: s.johnston/at/imperial.ac.uk).

^*LAS and SLJ contributed equally to this article.

Potential conflicts of interests: none reported, except: SLJ has received research grants from and consulted for AstraZeneca, Centocor, GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Synairgen and has share options in Synairgen.

AJC has received reimbursement for attending a symposium and fees for speaking as an employee of MedImmune.

Presented abstracts: “Effector memory CD8⁺T cell responses to RSV infected respiratory epithelial cells”

AG Telcian, LA Stanciu, and SL Johnston, Department of Respiratory Medicine, NHLI, Imperial College London, London, UK

European Respiratory Society Annual Congress, Vienna, Austria, 12-16 September 2009; abstract 4059

“Functional effect of RSV-induced PD-L1 on epithelial cell activation of CD8⁺T cells”

AG Telcian, V Laza-Stanca, LA Stanciu, and SL Johnston, Imperial College London, London, UK

American Thoracic Society Congress, San Francisco, USA, 18-23 May 2007; abstract A308

“CD8⁺T cell responses to RSV infected respiratory epithelial cells”

AG Telcian, V Laza-Stanca, LA Stanciu, and SL Johnston, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK

XXVI Congress of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Goteborg, Sweden, 9–13 June 2007; abstract A333

“Functional effect of RSV-induced PD-L1 on epithelial cell activation of CD8⁺T cells”

AG Telcian, V Laza-Stanca, LA Stanciu, and SL Johnston, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK

5th EAACI-GA2LEN-DAVOS Meeting, Basic Immunology on Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Davos, Switzerland, 1-4 February 2007; abstract A55

“Expression of PD-L1 on primary human bronchial epithelial cells and its regulation by respiratory syncytial virus, IFN-γ and IL-4”

AG Telcian, V Laza-Stanca, LA Stanciu, and SL Johnston, Department of Respiratory Medicine,Imperial College London, London, UK

XXV Congress of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Vienna, Austria, 10-14 June 2006; abstract A244

Received June 17, 2010; Accepted October 1, 2010.

This article has been corrected. See J Infect Dis. 2012 April 01; 205(7): 1180.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of bronchiolitis in infants. It is also responsible for high morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Programmed death ligands (PD-Ls) on antigen-presenting cells interact with receptors on T cells to regulate immune responses. The programmed death receptor-ligand 1/programmed death receptor 1 (PD-L1-PD-1) pathway is inhibitory in chronic viral infections, but its role in acute viral infections is unclear. We hypothesized that bronchial epithelial cell (BEC) expression of PD-Ls would inhibit local effector CD8⁺ T cell function. We report that RSV infection of primary human BECs strongly induces PD-L1 expression. In a co-culture system of BECs with purified CD8⁺ T cells, we demonstrated that RSV-infected BECs increased CD8⁺ T cell activation, proliferation, and antiviral function. Blocking PD-L1 on RSV-infected BECs co-cultured with CD8⁺ T cells enhanced CD8⁺ T cell IFN-γ, IL-2, and granzyme B production. It also decreased the virus load of the BECs. Based on our findings, we believe therapeutic strategies that target the PD-L1-PD-1 pathway might increase antiviral immune responses to RSV and other acute virus infections.

The programmed death ligand (PD-L)-PD-1 receptor pathway consists of the 2 ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 and their common receptor PD-1. PD-Ls on antigen-presenting cells interact with PD-1 on T cells to regulate T cell responses [1]. In chronic viral infections, blocking PD-1 engagement to PD-L1 revived the ex vivo function of exhausted virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells [2–4] and in vivo, restored CD8⁺ T cell ability to proliferate, secrete cytokines, and kill infected cells [5].

The role of PD-L1-PD-1 interactions in acute viral infections is not yet well understood. When PD-1 KO mice were infected with adenovirus, there was hepatic T cell expansion and more rapid viral clearance [6]. Furthermore, during acute rabies virus infection, PD-L1 absence led to better virus control as well as greater local accumulation of CD8⁺ T cells [7].

The role of the PD-1-PD-L1 pathway in acute respiratory viral infections is unknown.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major cause of respiratory morbidity in infants, children [8], and the elderly [9]. Immunity to RSV is incomplete, and re-infections may occur throughout life. RSV persistence has been reported in mice [10], guinea pigs [11], and rats [12]. Most importantly, it has been reported in humans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [13]. The mechanisms of deficient-memory immune response to RSV infection remain un-elucidated and demand further research.

Following recovery from a respiratory virus infection, an estimated ~50% of memory CD8⁺ T cells established are effector-memory T cells that persist in non-lymphoid tissues [14, 15]. These local effector-memory CD8⁺ T cells are involved in the initial response to re-infection, assisted by additional effector-memory CD8⁺ T cells recruited from the circulation [16].

Bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) are the primary site of RSV infection and express molecules associated with antigen presentation [17], including the PD-Ls [18, 19]. The PD-L–PD-1 pathway is believed to be important in host defense as many viruses exploit the inhibitory PD-L1-PD-1 pathway to down-regulate T cell responses and promote pathogen persistence [1].

We reasoned that by expressing PD-L molecules BECs may directly influence antiviral activity of effector-memory CD8⁺ T cells. The aim of our study, therefore, was to assess PD-L expression in primary human BECs and their modulation by RSV. Also, in a BEC/T cell co-culture system, we determined the influence of PD-1-PD-L pathways on CD8⁺ T cell antiviral functions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture and virus infection

RSV A2 strain was grown in Hep-2 cells, and virus titer determined by plaque assay. Human primary BECs (Clonetics, Cambrex) and the BEAS-2B bronchial epithelial cell line (European Collection of Animal and Cell Cultures) were cultured with RSV, UV-inactivated RSV, and filtered RSV, as described elsewhere [19, 20].

BEC/CD8⁺ T cell co-cultures

BEAS-2B cells were co-cultured with human CD8⁺ T cells (ratio, BEC:CD8

1:1). CD8⁺ T cells were isolated from peripheral blood of healthy donors by negative selection (Miltenyi Biotec). The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and we obtained informed consent.

BEAS-2B cells were seeded in 24-well plates and infected with RSV (multiplicity of infection [MOI], 1). Medium was removed 24 hrs after infection. Blocking antibodies to PD-L1, PD-L2, or isotype control (eBioscience, 10 μg/2.5

10⁵ BECs) were added 3 hrs before our addition of CD8⁺ T cells (purity, >95%). The moment when CD8⁺ T cells were added to BECs was considered time 0.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and TaqMan real-time PCR

RNA was extracted (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen), and 1 μg was used for cDNA synthesis (Omniscript RT Kit, Qiagen). Quantitative PCR was performed using primers and probes for PD-L1 (forward, 5′-GAATTGGTCATCCCAGAACTACCT-3′; reverse, 5′-GCATAATAAGATGGCTCCCAGAAT-3′; probe, FAM 5′-TGGCACATCCTCCAAATGAAAGGACTCA-3′ TAMRA), PD-L2 (forward, 5′-GCTGTGGCAAGTCCTCATATCA-3′; reverse, 5′-GCTGCAATTCCAGGCTCAAC-3′; probe, FAM 5′-ATACAGAACATGATCTTCCTCCTGCTAA-3′ TAMRA), RSV-L gene and 18S rRNA [20, 21].

Data were analyzed using Prism 7500 SDS software (version 1.4, ABI), normalized to 18S rRNA and presented as 45-δCT for PD-L1 and PD-L2 or converted to copy number using a standard curve for a plasmid of known concentration containing the amplified region of the RSV genome.

Flow cytometry

Epithelial cells were trypsinized to obtain a cell suspension and processed as described elsewhere [19]. Surface expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 was detected on BECs by direct staining using mouse anti-human antibodies from BD Pharmingen: PD-L1 (PE) and PD-L2 (FITC or APC). Results were expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) after subtracting the MFI of control cells stained with the appropriate isotype control antibodies (BD Pharmingen). We acquired at least 10,000 events using a BD LSR flow cytometer with CellQuest software (BD Bioscience) or a CyAN with Summit software (version 4.3, DakoCytomation).

FITC-carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester-(CFSE)-labeled CD8⁺ T cells [22] were stained for surface markers only (CD45RA [APC] and CCR7 [PECy7], as well as CD69, CD25, or PD-1 [all PE]) or combined surface and intracellular staining for cytokines/cytotoxic proteins: IFN-γ, IL-2, perforin (BD Pharmingen), and granzyme B (eBioscience) (all PE)] [23]. Analysis was performed on a CyAN 7 or 9 with Summit software (version 4.3, DakoCytomation) after we acquired at least 20,000 events. Appropriate isotype controls were included to assess the background fluorescence. Results were expressed as the percentage of all CD8⁺ T cells expressing a certain marker and as the distribution of these readouts in CD8⁺ T cell–specific subpopulations.

To assess cell proliferation, we added PHA (1 μg/mL, Sigma) to medium when we added CD8⁺ T cells to the co-culture. In different experiments we incubated CD8⁺ T cells overnight in plates coated with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (10 μg/mL, BD Pharmigen) in the presence of IL-2 (50 U/mL, Biosource). After 4–6 days of co-culture with BECs, we removed the lymphocytes along with supernatants and analyzed them by flow cytometry.

ELISA for IFN-γ, IL-2, and granzyme B

Supernatants from the co-cultures were used to measure IFN-γ and IL-2 levels using paired Abs and standards (CytoSet-s from Biosource). Assay sensitivities were 8 pg/mL (IFN-γ) and 15 pg/mL (IL-2). Granzyme B was tested by direct ELISA using an anti-human granzyme B antibody, followed by a biotinylated antibody (R&D Systems) with a sensitivity of 2 ng/mL.

Statistical analysis

Results were analyzed using Prism (version 4.00, GraphPad). Results of at least 3 separate experiments were expressed as means

standard errors of the means (SEM). When analyzing multiple groups, we used a 1-way ANOVA of all pairs and columns, followed, if significant, by a paired t test for paired comparisons. We considered P

.05 to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

PD-L1 is constitutively expressed by human primary BECs and is up-regulated by RSV infection

We previously reported the effect of RSV infection on PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression on cultured respiratory epithelial cell lines [19]. Here, we confirm that human primary BECs constitutively express PD-L1 (Figure 1A) but not PD-L2 (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Constitutive expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in human primary BECs and response to RSV infection. A-B: Cells cultured in medium alone were stained with isotype control (gray filled) or specific antibody (black line) to PD-L1 and PD-L2. C-F: Cells cultured (more ...)

Exposure of human primary BECs to increasing doses of RSV up-regulated PD-L1 mRNA expression and surface protein levels in a dose-responsive manner (Figure 1C and 1E). RSV up-regulation of PD-L1 was replication-dependent (UV-inactivated RSV had no effect on PD-L1 expression) (Figure 1C and 1E). PD-L2 mRNA expression was up-regulated by RSV, but surface protein was not found at 24 hrs after infection (Figure 1D and 1F).

RSV infection of BECs activates and increases proliferation of CD8⁺ T cells

Having demonstrated that RSV up-regulates PD-L1 expression on human primary BECs, we next investigated whether this molecule is functional in interacting with human CD8⁺ T cells in an in vitro co-culture system in which RSV-infected BEAS-2B cells directly interact with CD8⁺ T cells.

We initially confirmed our previous findings [19] that BEAS-2B cells express PD-L1/PD-L2 and that RSV up-regulated them (Figure S1A-D). We also confirmed the specificities of blocking antibodies to PD-L1 and PD-L2 (Figure S2E-F). As RSV-induced PD-L1/PD-L2 expression in these cells was present from 24 hrs until 96 hrs, BECs were infected with RSV alone for 24 hrs and then co-cultured for 72 hrs, so that induced PD-L expression would occur during BEC/CD8⁺ T cell co-cultures.

We first determined whether RSV infection of BECs results in CD8⁺ T cell activation in co-culture by determining CD69, CD25, and PD-1 levels. CD8⁺ T cells expressed activation markers CD69 and CD25 (Figure 2A-B) significantly more when co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs compared to co-culture with uninfected BECs. We detected no significant difference in PD-1-positive CD8⁺ T cells (Figure 2C). CD8⁺ T cell activation was not a result of direct stimulation by RSV, as CD69 positivity on CD8⁺ T cells exposed to RSV alone was 2.4

.8%, similar to CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with uninfected BECs (2.1

.3%) or CD8⁺ T cells in media alone (1.9

.8%, P

ns between groups).

Figure 2.

RSV infection of BECs induces activation of co-cultured CD8⁺ T cells. A-F: CD8⁺ T cells (CFSE labeled) were harvested at 48 hrs from the co-culture system and stained for CD69, CD25, and PD-1. CD69, CD25, and PD-1 expression on CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured (more ...)

According to CD45RA and CCR7 expression, CD8⁺ T cells are classified into the following subsets: effector memory (EM), terminally differentiated (TD), central memory (CM), and naïve [24]. Because CD8⁺ T cells present in the respiratory epithelium are likely to be either EM or TD cells, we investigated the ability of RSV-infected BECs to activate these 2 specific subpopulations. Significantly more EM and TD CD8⁺ T cells expressed CD69 when co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs compared to EM or TD CD8⁺ T cells in co-culture with uninfected BECs (Figure 2D). We observed no significant difference in CD25⁺ cells (Figure 2E), but we saw frequencies of PD-1-positive cells that were higher in both CD8⁺ T cell subpopulations during exposure to RSV-infected BECs (Figure 2F).

We next compared proliferation of CFSE-labeled CD8⁺ T cells in co-culture with uninfected or RSV-infected BECs. The percentage of non-proliferating PHA-stimulated cells was higher in CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with uninfected BECs (94.8

1.2%) compared to co-cultures with RSV-infected BECs (21.09

4.9%, n

4, P

.001), where cells underwent proliferation of 2–8 generations. We obtained similar results when we pre-stimulated CD8⁺ T cells with anti-CD3/IL-2 before adding them to the co-culture (Figure 2G).

RSV infection of BECs increases antiviral cytokine production and cytotoxic capacity in CD8⁺ T cells

IFN-γ and IL-2 production are key elements of CD8⁺ T cell antiviral function. We determined the frequencies of IFN-γ⁺CD8⁺ and IL-2⁺CD8⁺ cells in co-culture by intracellular staining (plots of IFN-γ and IL-2 staining in CD8⁺ T cells are shown in Figure 3A). The percentage of CD8⁺ T cells positive for IFN-γ or IL-2 was significantly higher when cells were co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs compared with uninfected BECs (Figure 3B-C).

Figure 3.

RSV infection of BECs induces antiviral cytokine production in CD8⁺ T cells. CD8⁺ T cells (CFSE labeled) were harvested at 48 hrs from the co-culture system and stained for intracellular IFN-γ or IL-2 (PMA and ionomycin in the presence of brefeldin (more ...)

Among the effector subpopulations, both EM and TD CD8⁺ T cells showed significantly increased frequencies of IFN-γ⁺ cells, but not of IL-2⁺ cells, when co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs compared with uninfected BECs (Figure 3D-E).

To further investigate the subpopulations of CD8⁺ T cells producing each cytokine, we back-gated CD8⁺ T cells producing each cytokine and plotted these positive cells with markers for CD8⁺ T cell subpopulations (Figure 3F-G, Table 1). The majority of IFN⁺CD8⁺ T cells were EM and TD, whereas very few were naïve or central memory. The majority of IL-2-producing cells were naïve, although substantial numbers of cells were EM and smaller numbers were TD or central memory.

Table 1.

Distribution of cytokine- and cytotoxic protein–positive CD8⁺ T cells within CD8⁺ T cell subpopulations. CD8⁺ T cells were co-cultured with uninfected or RSV-infected BECs, harvested at 48 hrs from the co-culture system, and stained for intracellular (more ...)

We also assessed IFN-γ and IL-2 release into supernatants from the co-cultures and found a significant increase in IFN-γ and IL-2 levels when CD8⁺ T cells were co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs compared with uninfected BECs (Figure 5A-B, left 2 columns). Peak levels were at 48 hrs after co-culture (Figure S1G-H). Therefore we used this time point to determine most outcomes.

Figure 5.

Blocking PD-L1 in co-culture enhances CD8⁺ T cell antiviral cytokine production and reduces viral load in BECs. A-C: Effect of PD-L blockage on the levels of cytokines and cytotoxic proteins released by CD8⁺ T cells in CD8/BEC co-culture. CD8⁺ T cells (more ...)

Because cytotoxic activity is also an important antiviral function of CD8⁺ T cells, we next investigated how RSV-infected BECs influence CD8⁺ T cell cytotoxic activity. Representative plots of granzyme B and perforin-staining gated on CD8⁺ T cells are shown in Figure 4A. Frequencies of granzyme B- and perforin-positive CD8⁺ T cells were marginally—and this is significantly—greater in co-culture with RSV-infected BECs compared with uninfected BECs (Figure 4B-C).

Figure 4.

RSV infection of BECs induces antiviral cytotoxic granule protein production in CD8⁺ T cells. CD8⁺ T cells (CFSE labeled) were harvested at 48 hrs from the co-culture system and stained for intracellular granzyme B or perforin (brefeldin was used for (more ...)

When we examined effector subpopulations, we observed similar small, but significant, increases in granzyme B- and perforin-positive cells among TD CD8⁺ T cells when co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs. However, we observed no significant differences in the EM populations (Figure 4D-E). After back-gating the CD8⁺ T cells that produced each cytotoxic protein from uninfected and RSV-infected BEC co-cultures, we confirmed that the majority of granzyme B- and perforin-producing cells were EM and TD CD8⁺ T cells (Figure 4F-G, Table 1).

Granzyme B protein release into supernatants of co-cultured CD8⁺ T cells and RSV-infected BECs also showed an increase compared with co-cultures CD8⁺ T cells and uninfected BECs (Figure 5C, left 2 columns).

PD-L1 blockade increases antiviral cytokine and cytotoxic protein levels in CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs

To investigate the functional roles of PD-L1/PD-L2-PD-1 pathways in BEC/CD8⁺ T cell interactions, we co-cultured CD8⁺ T cells with RSV-infected BECs in the presence of blocking antibodies to PD-L1. These co-cultures released increased IFN-γ, IL-2, and granzyme B levels into supernatants, compared with co-cultures in the absence of anti-PD-L1 antibodies (Figure 5A-C, middle 2 panels). In contrast, anti-PD-L2 antibodies had no influence on IFN-γ, IL-2, or granzyme B released in CD8⁺ T cell/RSV-infected BEC co-cultures (Figure 5A-C, second and fourth columns). The isotype controls showed no effect on released cytokines compared with CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs with no blocking antibodies (IFN-γ, 139.5

28.3 vs 129.6

22.5 pg/mL; IL-2, 43.7

5.5 vs 35.1

4.5 pg/mL; granzyme B, 15.7

3.8 vs 16.8

2.9 ng/mL; P

ns in all cases).

PD-L1 blockade decreases RSV gene expression in BECs

Finally, we assessed RSV replication by quantifying RSV polymerase L gene expression in BECs in the co-culture system (Figure 5D) and observed a significant reduction (Figure 5D, left 2 columns) in RSV L gene expression when RSV-infected BECs were co-cultured with CD8⁺ T cells, compared with RSV-infected BECs alone ([17.6

2.7]×10⁶ vs [31.9 ± 8.3]×10⁶ copy numbers, 40% reduction, P

.05). This assessment confirms that CD8⁺ T cells have an antiviral effect in this co-culture system. RSV L gene expression was further decreased in the presence of PD-L1 blocking antibodies in co-cultures compared with RSV-infected BECs/CD8⁺ T cells without blocking antibody ([11.1

2.7]×10⁶ vs [17.6

2.7]×10⁶ copy numbers, P < .05) (Figure 5D, middle 2 columns), whereas the isotype control antibody had no effect ([14

3.4]×10⁶ vs [17.6

2.7]×10⁶ copy numbers, P

ns). As we expected based on their failure to influence type 1 cytokine and cytotoxic protein production, PD-L2 blocking antibodies did not influence the RSV gene expression in co-culture ([15.6

4.1]×10⁶ vs [17.6

2.7]×10⁶ copy numbers, P

ns) (Figure 5D).

DISCUSSION

We report here that RSV infection of primary human BECs strongly up-regulated PD-L1 expression and that in CD8⁺ T cell/BEC co-cultures, RSV-infected BECs increased CD8⁺ T cell activation, proliferation, and antiviral cytokine and cytotoxic protein production. We observed the latter chiefly among effector-memory and terminally differentiated CD8⁺ T cell subsets. PD-L1 blockade enhanced CD8⁺ T cell secretion of IFN-γ, IL-2, and granzyme B and suppressed RSV replication. These data indicate that virus induction of PD-L1 expression on BECs can inhibit local CD8⁺ T cell antiviral activities in the context of an acute respiratory viral infection.

PD-L1 is constitutively expressed in primary nasal cells and BECs [18, 19, 25]. Poly I:C and rhinovirus-16 induce both PD-L1 and PD-L2 on primary BECs and nasal epithelial cells [25]. We found that RSV infection of primary BECs increased PD-L1-expression robustly, ~30-fold for mRNA and ~4-fold for protein. In contrast, rhinovirus-16 up-regulated PD-L1 protein only ~2-fold on human primary BECs [25]. These data, together with the known inhibitory effects of PD-L1 in the context of chronic viral infections [2–4], prompted us to investigate in vitro the functional importance of PD-L1 induction in the antiviral immune responses to RSV infection.

We first hypothesized that uninfected epithelial cells would not activate CD8⁺ T cells, but in contrast RSV-infected BECs would stimulate CD8⁺ T cells to express activation markers, proliferate, and induce cytokine and cytotoxic protein secretion.

CD69 is one of the earliest activation markers on T cells. The peak proportion of CD69⁺ T cells in response to alloantigen stimulation is reported to be <3% [26]. Consistent with this, in our studies, CD69 was present on 2–3% of CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with uninfected BECs. But this percentage was significantly increased (~3 times) on CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs. We noticed a weaker induction for CD25 and PD-1 (which is persistently up-regulated on exhausted lymphocytes in chronic viral infections) [2–4]. PD-1 was found in low percentages (< 0.5%) on our CD8⁺T cells as they were isolated from normal donors, and was not significantly increased on total CD8⁺T cells co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs.

It is reported that healthy epithelium can suppress local lymphocyte activation, whereas infected epithelium becomes an activator [27]. The mechanisms through which CD8⁺ T cells get activated by virus-infected BECs are not fully understood. It was shown that activation is partly contact-dependent and partly mediated by transforming growth factor β [27]. We have observed that RSV up-regulates MHC class I molecule levels on the surface of infected BECs (data not shown). It is also likely that RSV up-regulates CD80 and CD86 molecules. These molecules have been shown to be induced by rhinovirus infection on respiratory epithelial cells [17]. So far, there are no data to support that CD8⁺ T cell activation by virus-infected BECs occurs via these molecules.

The CD8⁺ T cells most likely found in contact with BECs in vivo are the EM and TD subpopulations [14, 15]. We observed that the levels of expression of CD69, CD25, and PD-1 were all higher in these subpopulations than in total CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with uninfected BECs. In addition their induction by RSV-infected BECs was greater in the EM and TD subpopulations than in total CD8⁺ T cells. These data suggest the CD8⁺ T cells, which respond to RSV-infected BECs by activation, are the EM and TD CD8⁺ T cell subsets.

Nonspecific-stimulated CD8⁺ T cells did not proliferate in uninfected BEC/CD8⁺ T cell co-cultures. However, the majority of nonspecific-stimulated CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs underwent >1 round of proliferation. Nonspecific-stimulated CD8⁺ T cells cultured alone proliferated in a manner similar to CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs (data not shown). This proliferation suggests that un-infected epithelium actually has the capacity to inhibit CD8⁺ T cell proliferation, similar to results obtained in vitro with murine cells [27].

Cytokine (IFN-γ and IL-2) and cytotoxic protein (granzyme and perforin) production showed similar patterns for the activation markers, with higher induction occurring in CD8⁺ T cells co-cultured with RSV-infected BECs compared with un-infected BECs. Induction of IFN-γ in CD8⁺ T cells occurred chiefly among the effector cell populations, whereas induction of IL-2 occurred mostly among naïve cells. Granzyme B and perforin production was found almost exclusively in EM and TD subpopulations. But CD8⁺ T cells expressed high levels of cytotoxic proteins, especially granzyme B, even when co-cultured with un-infected BECs. Thus, the increase in their numbers was relatively modest.

These data are in accordance with anticipated function: Resting BECs did not activate CD8⁺ T cells, but RSV-infected BECs equipped local CD8⁺ T cells for appropriate expansion and antiviral effector function.

We next hypothesized that increased PD-L1 expression in this context might prevent full activation of antiviral effector functions. Indeed, we found a further increase of IFN-γ, IL-2, and granzyme B levels in the presence of PD-L1 (but not PD-L2) blocking antibody, confirming that increased expression of PD-L1 acts as an inhibitor in this system.

Relatively few models have investigated functional memory T cell responses to live virus infections. We therefore developed this in vitro co-culture system to study these events in a system modeling epithelial/CD8⁺ T cell interactions as they might occur in vivo. T cells are found in association with epithelium in the respiratory tract, and it has been demonstrated that human bronchial epithelial cells can present antigens and directly activate cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells [28]. Substantial evidence underscores the fact that effector-memory CD8⁺ T cells do not proliferate in the lung or airways, suggesting that new cells continually come from the circulation [16]. By using CD8⁺ T cells isolated from peripheral blood, we tried to create an in vitro environment similar to that found in the human respiratory tract. Our data confirm that PD-L1 can indeed inhibit local antiviral interactions between BECs and CD8⁺ T cells in acute respiratory infections.

These findings may have important implications in increased susceptibility to RSV infection in infants, as well as in incomplete memory immune responses to RSV in older children, adults, and the elderly. Blocking PD-L1 may be a useful therapeutic approach to augment antiviral immunity in acute respiratory viral infections such as RSV.

Funding

British Lung Foundation Grant P04/13; Wellcome Trust Grant 083567/Z/07/Z; The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre funding scheme; UCB Institute of Allergy, European Respiratory Society (LTRF no 33) and BMA HC Roscoe Research Grant P24259 (to AG Telcian); Asthma UK Grant 05/067 and BMA HC Roscoe Research Grant PO 7269 (to V Laza-Stanca).

References

1. Sharpe AH, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R, Freeman GJ. The function of programmed cell death 1 and its ligands in regulating autoimmunity and infection. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:239–45. [PubMed]

2. Day CL, Kaufmann DE, Kiepiela P, et al. PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells is associated with T-cell exhaustion and disease progression. Nature. 2006;443:350–4. [PubMed]

3. Penna A, Pilli M, Zerbini A, et al. Dysfunction and functional restoration of HCV-specific CD8 responses in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2007;45:588–601. [PubMed]

4. Boni C, Fisicaro P, Valdatta C, et al. Characterization of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific T-cell dysfunction in chronic HBV infection. J Virol. 2007;81:4215–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

5. Barber DL, Wherry EJ, Masopust D, et al. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature. 2006;439:682–7. [PubMed]

6. Iwai Y, Terawaki S, Ikegawa M, Okazaki T, Honjo T. PD-1 inhibits antiviral immunity at the effector phase in the liver. J Exp Med. 2003;198:39–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

7. Lafon M, Megret F, Meuth SG, et al. Detrimental contribution of the immuno-inhibitor B7-H1 to rabies virus encephalitis. J Immunol. 2008;180:7506–15. [PubMed]

8. Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, et al. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:588–98. [PubMed]

9. Falsey AR, Hennessey PA, Formica MA, Cox C, Walsh EE. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1749–59. [PubMed]

10. Schwarze J, O'Donnell DR, Rohwedder A, Openshaw PJ. Latency and persistence of respiratory syncytial virus despite T cell immunity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:801–5. [PubMed]

11. Hegele RG, Hayashi S, Bramley AM, Hogg JC. Persistence of respiratory syncytial virus genome and protein after acute bronchiolitis in guinea pigs. Chest. 1994;105:1848–54. [PubMed]

12. Sorkness RL, Gern JE, Grindle KA, et al. Persistence of viral RNA in 2 rat strains differing in susceptibility to postbronchiolitis airway dysfunction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:607–9. [PubMed]

13. Wilkinson TM, Donaldson GC, Johnston SL, Openshaw PJ, Wedzicha JA. Respiratory syncytial virus, airway inflammation, and FEV1 decline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:871–6. [PubMed]

14. Ely KH, Cauley LS, Roberts AD, Brennan JW, Cookenham T, Woodland DL. Nonspecific recruitment of memory CD8+ T cells to the lung airways during respiratory virus infections. J Immunol. 2003;170:1423–9. [PubMed]

15. Kohlmeier JE, Woodland DL. Immunity to respiratory viruses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:61–82. [PubMed]

16. Hikono H, Kohlmeier JE, Ely KH, et al. T-cell memory and recall responses to respiratory virus infections. Immunol Rev. 2006;211:119–32. [PubMed]

17. Papi A, Stanciu LA, Papadopoulos NG, Teran LM, Holgate ST, Johnston SL. Rhinovirus infection induces major histocompatibility complex class I and costimulatory molecule upregulation on respiratory epithelial cells. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:1780–4. [PubMed]

18. Kim J, Myers AC, Chen L, et al. Constitutive and inducible expression of b7 family of ligands by human airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005;33:280–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

19. Stanciu LA, Bellettato CM, Laza-Stanca V, Coyle AJ, Papi A, Johnston SL. Expression of programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L) 1, PD-L2, B7-H3, and inducible costimulator ligand on human respiratory tract epithelial cells and regulation by respiratory syncytial virus and type 1 and 2 cytokines. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:404–12. [PubMed]

20. Edwards MR, Johnson MW, Johnston SL. Combination therapy: Synergistic suppression of virus-induced chemokines in airway epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2006;34:616–24. [PubMed]

21. Culley FJ, Pollott J, Openshaw PJ. Age at first viral infection determines the pattern of T cell-mediated disease during reinfection in adulthood. J Exp Med. 2002;196:1381–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

22. Lyons AB. Analysing cell division in vivo and in vitro using flow cytometric measurement of CFSE dye dilution. J Immunol Methods. 2000;243:147–54. [PubMed]

23. Cho SH, Stanciu LA, Begishivili T, Bates PJ, Holgate ST, Johnston SL. Peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cell type 1 and type 2 cytokine production in atopic asthmatic and normal subjects. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32:427–33. [PubMed]

24. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Forster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 1999;401:708–12. [PubMed]

25. Heinecke L, Proud D, Sanders S, Schleimer RP, Kim J. Induction of B7-H1 and B7-DC expression on airway epithelial cells by the Toll-like receptor 3 agonist double-stranded RNA and human rhinovirus infection: In vivo and in vitro studies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:1155–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

26. Craston R, Koh M, Mc Dermott A, Ray N, Prentice HG, Lowdell MW. Temporal dynamics of CD69 expression on lymphoid cells. J Immunol Methods. 1997;209:37–45. [PubMed]

27. Wang H, Su Z, Schwarze J. Healthy but not RSV-infected lung epithelial cells profoundly inhibit T cell activation. Thorax. 2009;64:283–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

28. Kraetzel K, Stoelcker B, Eissner G, et al. NKG2D-dependent effector function of bronchial epithelium-activated alloreactive T-cells. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:563–70. [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of
Oxford University Press