Palmitoylation of H-Ras is required for its association with the PM. This is a consequence both of increased affinity for phospholipid bilayers and entry into specific membrane trafficking pathways. It has long been appreciated that protein
S-palmitoylation is a reversible modification (
Smotrys and Linder, 2004) and that palmitate turns over on acylated proteins, including Ras (
Magee et al., 1987). More recently, the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle of H-Ras was shown to be causally linked to bidirectional trafficking between the Golgi and PM (
Goodwin et al., 2005;
Rocks et al., 2005). What remains unknown is how the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle of H-Ras is regulated. Our data show that FKBP12 regulates the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle of H-Ras by binding to the GTPase in a palmitoylation-dependent fashion and promoting depalmitoylation through a mechanism that requires the prolyl-isomerase activity of FKBP12 and proline 179 of H-Ras.
The half-life of palmitate has been reported to be anywhere from 20 min (
Magee et al., 1987) to 2.4 hrs (
Baker et al., 2003). In contrast, our pulse/chase data suggest that the loss of palmitate from H-Ras is biphasic with a rapid initial phase followed by much slower loss (). Half of the label was lost in the initial, rapid phase that had a t
1/2 of less than 5 min. The discrepancy between our results and those previously reported might be explained by the significantly shorter pulse time we employed and the avoidance of CHX, which we now know affects depalmitoylation. In the older studies “pulse” labeling with [
3H]palmitate ranged from 2–4 hrs. Two factors call into question the utility of such long pulse times. To become a substrate for protein acyl transferases, [
3H]palmitate must not only be transported into the cell but also conjugated with coenzyme A. Long pulse times allow cellular pools of [
3H]palmitoyl-CoA to reach equilibrium making an efficient chase untenable. In addition, [
3H]palmitate released from labeled cellular proteins and lipids can be recycled to [
3H]palmitoyl-CoA such that a large equilibrium pool of labeled protein serves as a reservoir of [
3H]palmitoyl-CoA, confounding the ability to efficiently chase with unlabeled palmitate. We minimized these obstacles by labeling with a true “pulse” of only 5 min and compensating by significantly increasing the concentration of [
3H]palmitate. The more rapid turnover of [
3H]palmitate that we observed can be more easily reconciled with H-Ras trafficking data in live cells than can the older measurements; fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and photoactivation studies have shown that the t
1/2 of H-Ras recovery on, or delivery to, the Golgi is less than 10 min (
Goodwin et al., 2005;
Rocks et al., 2005).
Although the last ten amino acids of H-Ras that include both palmitoylation sites was established almost two decades ago as the minimal PM targeting sequence (
Hancock et al., 1991), several recent studies have reported signaling and trafficking information in the portion of the hypervariable region immediately upstream of this sequence. Rotblat reported that three separable domains contributed to H-Ras association with PM microdomains: the lipid anchor (aa 179–189), the hypervariable linker region (hvr = aa 166–179) and the GTP-binding domain (aa 1–165) (
Rotblat et al., 2004). Whereas the lipid anchor associated with lipid rafts, the hvr afforded affinity for non-raft membranes. Laude and Prior showed that the composition of the hvr of H-Ras affected both the distribution of the protein between the PM and Golgi and steady-state palmitoylation (
Laude and Prior, 2008).
Although FKBP12 is best known for its ability to bind to and inhibit calcineurin in the presence of FK506, physical interactions with several receptors have led to the idea that FKBP12 plays a role in signaling. FKBP12 binds and regulates the activity of TGFβ1R (
Wang et al., 1996), IP
3R (
Cameron et al., 1995), and the ryanodine receptor (
Wehrens et al., 2003). Our data provide evidence for an additional role in signaling downstream of receptors at the level of Ras.
Our observation that the binding of FKBP12 to a substrate for prolyl isomerization does not depend on the proline is consistent with binding data for TGFβ1R (
Wang et al., 1996). Our discovery that palmitoylation is required for H-Ras binding to FKBP12 is consistent with the crystal structure of the isomerase which reveals a hydrophobic groove. This groove serves as the binding surface for both peptide substrates and FK506, consistent with the observation that FK506 acts to inhibit PI activity by competing with substrates for binding (
Van Duyne et al., 1991). The ability of FK506 to compete for H-Ras binding confirms the substrate pocket as the binding site for H-Ras. However, this model presents a conundrum: how can the acyl chains of H-Ras simultaneously insert into the phospholipid bilayer and associate with the hydrophobic pocket of FKBP12? One possibility is that FKBP12 acts as a cytosolic chaperone that can extract palmitoylated Ras proteins from membranes and render them soluble in much the same way that RhoGDI acts on geranylgeranylated Rho proteins (
Michaelson et al., 2001).
The evidence for the reversibility of
S-acylation of H-Ras is compelling but the mechanism of depalmitoylation remains unclear. Several thioesterases can catalyze the hydrolysis of the thioester bonds of H-Ras
in vitro (
Smotrys and Linder, 2004), but which, if any, of these plays a physiologic role in H-Ras trafficking and signaling has not been determined. One of these, APT1, was first purified from rat liver cytosol and shown to have activity
in vitro toward both G protein α subunits and H-Ras, although the efficiency was six fold higher for the G
α (
Duncan and Gilman, 1998) and the
S. cerevisiae ortholog acts on the G protein α subunit Gpa1p but not Ras2p (
Duncan and Gilman, 2002). Besides the apparent substrate specificity favoring G protein α subunits over H-Ras, the other problem with considering APT1 as the relevant thioesterase is the fact that, whereas APT1 is a soluble, cytosolic enzyme, its putative substrate is associated with membranes in an orientation that makes the thioester bond inaccessible. However, APT1 itself has been reported to be palmitoylated (Yang et al.), suggesting a mechanism whereby a pool of the enzyme might associate with the membrane and thereby come into proximity with membrane-associated substrates. Our observation that all of the
in vitro thioesterase activity in HeLa cell homogenates is in the membrane fraction argues that, if APT1 is the relevant thioesterase, it is the acylated pool that is active. One parsimonious corollary that follows from a model in which FKBP12 serves as a chaperone for palmitoylated Ras proteins is that the H-Ras/FKPB12 complex would be expected to render the thioester bond accessible to thioesterases like APT1. A role for FKBP12 in presenting the thioester bond to a membrane-associated thioesterase is plausible considering that the farnesyl modification will afford some membrane affinity, even when the acyl chains are disengaged from the membrane.
The ability of FKBP12 to extract palmitoylated Ras proteins from membranes might be enough to explain its role in promoting depalmitoylation. However, our data strongly suggest that the PI activity of FKBP12 is also important. GFP extended with either 10 or 19 of the C-terminal amino acids of H-Ras bound equally well to FKBP12, but the steady-state palmitoylation of only the latter construct containing prolines was affected by FK506. The ability of FK506 to augment palmitoylation of H-Ras, to affect PM to Golgi trafficking and to stimulate H-Ras12V induced PC12 cell differentiation was dependent on proline 179. This suggests that cis-trans isomerization about the G-P bond at position 178–179 promotes hydrolysis of the thioester bonds at positions 181 and 184. One model that incorporates this observation posits that the thioesterase that acts on H-Ras associated with FKBP12 works more efficiently when the peptidyl-prolyl bond at position 178–179 is in a cis conformation.
Although prolyl isomerization is most often thought of in the context of folding of nascent proteins, the concept of prolyl isomerization operating like other post-translational modifications to mediate information flow down signaling pathways is attractive. The best evidence for such regulation comes from Pin1, a phosphoprotein-directed PI in the parvulin family that has been shown to act on multiple regulators of the cell cycle, including the Ras/MAPK pathway at the level of Raf-1 (
Lu et al., 2007).
Cis-trans isomerization about G-P bonds catalyzed by CypA has been shown to regulate the Ikt kinase (
Brazin et al., 2002) and the adaptor protein Crk (
Nicholson and Lu, 2007). In each of these examples, prolyl isomerization can be thought of as a molecular timer regulated by PIs (
Lu et al., 2007). The dwell time of palmitoylated Ras on the inner leaflet of the PM is regulated by depalmitoylation. Our data are consistent with a model in which
cis-trans isomerization of the G-P bond at position 178–179 acts as a molecular timer to trigger depalmitoylation and thereby limit the time of residence of H-Ras at the PM.