Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcoHomeThis ArticleSearchSubmitASCO JCO Homepage
J Clin Oncol. 2011 March 20; 29(9): 1140–1145.
Published online 2011 February 22. doi:  10.1200/JCO.2010.33.3591
PMCID: PMC3083869

Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed and Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer



We hypothesized that bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), will potentiate the activity of pemetrexed, a multitargeted antifolate, in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Patients and Methods

Patients with previously untreated, recurrent, or metastatic SCCHN were treated with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg given intravenously every 21 days with folic acid and B12 supplementation until disease progression. Primary end point was time-to-progression (TTP). DNA was isolated from whole blood samples for the detection of polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), and VEGF.


Forty patients were enrolled. The median TTP was 5 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.3 months. In 37 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 30%, including a complete response rate of 5%, and the disease control rate was 86%. Grade 3 to 5 bleeding events occurred in six patients (15%): four were grade 3, and two were fatal. Other serious toxicities in 10% or more of patients included neutropenia (10%) and infection (12.5%). One patient died of sepsis after receiving eight cycles of therapy. For the MTHFR A1298C (rs1801131) single nucleotide polymorphisms, homozygote patients with AA had worse OS (P = .034).


The addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed resulted in promising efficacy outcomes in SCCHN. Bleeding events were frequent but some may have been due to natural history of disease. Polymorphisms in MTHFR may offer potential for treatment individualization.


Approximately 47,000 new cases of head and neck cancer are diagnosed annually in the United States, most of which are histologically squamous cell carcinomas.1 Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is potentially curable when diagnosed at early or localized stages. Distant metastases, which commonly involve the lungs, are seen in a small fraction of patients at first presentation but may subsequently develop in approximately 20% to 30% of patients who initially present with locally advanced SCCHN. Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN have a poor prognosis with a median survival of 6 to 10 months.2,3 Selected patients with locally recurrent disease can be treated with a curative intent with locoregional therapies, such as salvage surgery or radiotherapy; however, the vast majority die of their disease.2,3

Active single agents in SCCHN include methotrexate, bleomycin, cisplatin, carboplatin, FU, paclitaxel, docetaxel, and cetuximab.4 A small randomized study5 reported survival benefit for chemotherapy with cisplatin versus no treatment. Although combination chemotherapy yields higher response rates, it has not been shown to produce a survival benefit compared with single agents in randomized comparisons.68 Moreover, toxicity was increased with combination chemotherapy, especially with cisplatin-based regimens. Recently, the addition of cetuximab to platinum and FU was shown to improve median survival from 7.4 to 10.1 months and median progression-free survival from 3.3 to 5.6 months in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, albeit with increased but acceptable toxicities.9 The study of other novel agents remains of major importance for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic SCCHN.

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate that inhibits several enzymes of the folate pathway including thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase.10 It has proven efficacy in non–small-cell lung cancer11,12 and malignant pleural mesothelioma.13 Because methotrexate, another antifolate, is a standard therapy for recurrent or metastatic SCCHN, the development of pemetrexed for the treatment of SCCHN has attracted the attention of clinical investigators. A phase II trial of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks reported an objective response rate of 27% and a median time-to-progression (TTP) of 3.9 months in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN.14 A recently presented phase III trial showed that the combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin does not significantly prolong survival over cisplatin alone in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN; however, survival benefit was detected in the subset of patients with good performance status or oropharyngeal primaries.15

Angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most important proangiogenic factor.1618 Targeting angiogenesis by using bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, has been efficacious in several solid tumors. There is strong evidence for increased antitumor efficacy when bevacizumab is added to various chemotherapeutics, and survival benefit with this approach has been demonstrated in metastatic colorectal cancer and non–small-cell lung cancer.19 One possible mechanism of action is by increasing delivery of chemotherapy to the tumor site.20,21 VEGF and other angiogenesis markers are expressed in SCCHN, and high VEGF levels have been correlated with poor survival.2224

Gene polymorphisms of TS and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), a key enzyme in folate metabolism that regulates nucleic acid methylation, have been correlated with outcome in patients treated with antifolates; however, results have been inconsistent.25 The clinical relevance of these polymorphisms in patients with SCCHN treated with pemetrexed remains uncertain. Additionally, there are no reliable biomarkers that can be used as predictors of outcome after antiangiogenesis treatment. An association between VEGF genotype and survival was noted in a trial of paclitaxel and bevacizumab in patients with breast cancer.26 In this phase II study, we investigated the hypothesis that bevacizumab can potentiate the activity of pemetrexed in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. We also evaluated TS, MTHFR, and VEGF gene polymorphisms and their association with toxicity and efficacy.


Patient Selection

Eligible patients were age 18 years or older with metastatic or locally recurrent SCCHN, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1, and measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) definitions.27 No prior chemotherapy or biologic therapy for recurrent or metastatic SCCHN and no prior pemetrexed or bevacizumab at any time were allowed. Prior chemotherapy and targeted agents (eg, cetuximab) as part of initial potentially curative therapy was permitted provided it was completed > 6 months before registration. Patients were also required to have absolute neutrophil count > 1,500/μL and platelet count > 100,000/μL, total bilirubin within normal range, AST and ALT < 3× the upper limit of normal, creatinine clearance > 45 mL/min, urine protein:creatinine ratio < 1, and no pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or above.

Patients with brain metastasis, tumors that invaded major vessels (eg, the carotid), history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, or gross hemoptysis, or those receiving therapeutic anticoagulation were excluded. After two fatal bleeding events occurred, the protocol was amended to exclude patients with history of tumor-related bleeding in the previous 6 months. Patients with history of hypertension were well controlled on a stable regimen of antihypertensive therapy. Patients with history of active infection or severe comorbidities, such as active cardiac ischemia, congestive heart failure, or severe neurologic or psychiatric disease, were ineligible. The study protocol was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board, and all patients provided written informed consent before study entry.

Treatment Plan

Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg were given intravenously on the same day, every 21 days, until disease progression. If the first 90-minute bevacizumab infusion was tolerated without adverse events, the second infusion could be delivered over 60 minutes, and all subsequent infusions would be delivered over 30 minutes. All patients received folic acid 1,000 μg once daily orally and vitamin B12 1,000 μg intramuscularly, every 9 weeks, beginning 1 week before starting treatment. Patients also received dexamethasone 4 mg twice daily orally, 1 day prior, the day of, and 1 day after pemetrexed. Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not permitted.

Treatment Evaluation

Before initiating treatment, patients were evaluated with a history and physical examination, complete blood count, serum chemistry profile, coagulation tests, urine protein:creatinine ratio on spot urine sample, and ECG. During treatment, clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed before each cycle. Radiologic evaluation by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging was performed for baseline tumor assessment and after every two cycles of therapy. Toxicities were assessed by using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0.

Gene Polymorphisms in TS, MTHFR, and VEGF

DNA was isolated from whole blood samples collected before first drug administration by using commercially available kits. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TS, MTHFR, and VEGF were evaluated. SNPs were detected by using a TaqMan-based SNP genotyping kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) run on the ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System v1.7 (Applied Biosystems). The TS gene promoter repeat and SNP (two or three repeats; G>C within second repeat of the 3R allele) polymorphisms were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism–PCR analyses as previously described.28 Positive and negative PCR controls were included with each amplification reaction. Samples were genotyped in a blinded fashion, and an additional 10% of samples were repeated to verify the reproducibility of the assay. All results were interpreted independently by two laboratory observers.

Statistical Methods

The primary end point was TTP, and the study used a one-stage design. Secondary efficacy end points were objective response rate (RR) by RECIST27 and overall survival. TTP was calculated from treatment initiation to disease progression or last follow-up, and overall survival was calculated from treatment initiation to death or last follow-up. A sample size of 40 patients provided 88% power to detect a 2-month improvement in median TTP (ie, from 3.9 months [historical control14] to 5.9 months) at a significance level of 0.1. TTP for the whole study cohort was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method with a 90% CI for the median and compared with that of the historical control population with a one-tailed, one-sample log-rank test for which the expected times to progression followed an exponential distribution. TTP and overall survival for genes and polymorphism subsets were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with a multivariate log-rank permutation test.29 This procedure adjusts the resulting P value for multiple testing while fixing any correlations among polymorphisms. If the permutation-adjusted P value was < .05, the specific polymorphisms were probed to determine which genotypes contributed to differences in survival. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for gene polymorphisms was tested by a goodness-of-fit χ2 test to compare the observed genotype frequencies with the expected frequencies.


Forty patients were enrolled in three participating centers, including affiliated community hospitals. Baseline characteristics are provided in Table 1. Twenty-six of 29 patients who had received chemotherapy as part of previous potentially curative therapy received a platinum-based regimen. The median number of cycles of therapy delivered was six (range, one to 30). Two patients had dose reductions of pemetrexed for grade 3 toxicities, and 10 patients had at least one bevacizumab dose delayed or omitted for either toxicities or unrelated events (no dose reductions of bevacizumab were allowed).

Table 1.
Patient Characteristics (n = 40)


The median TTP was 5 months (90% CI, 4 to 7 months; Fig 1). Thus, the null hypothesis of a median TTP of 3.9 months was rejected (P = .02). Eight patients were alive at the time of the analysis, and these patients had a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 3 to 33 months). The median overall survival was 11.3 months (90% CI, 8.7 to 16.8 months; Fig 1). Thirty-seven of 40 patients were evaluable for response. Three patients had no repeat tumor assessments performed because they were removed from the study early, after one to two cycles, because of toxicities. The objective RR was 30% (90% CI, 17% to 42%; nine partial and two complete responses), and the disease control rate was 86% (90% CI, 77% to 96%; Table 2). Two partial responses and one complete response were observed in the 11 chemotherapy-naive patients; there was no difference in RR or survival between these patients and the rest of the patients.

Fig 1.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) time-to-progression and (B) overall survival (solid line) with 90% CIs (dotted line). The median time-to-progression was 5 months, and the median overall survival was 11.3 months.
Table 2.
Objective Response


All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Grade 3 to 5 toxicities reported during the study are listed in Table 3. Six patients (15%) had grade 3 to 5 bleeding events, two of which were grade 5. One patient suffered fatal tracheal bleeding; this patient had a prior history of bloody tracheal secretions associated with tumor invading the trachea that had previously responded to reirradiation. Another fatal event occurred after rechallenging with bevacizumab after recurrent tumor-related bleeding. Two grade 2 and six grade 1 bleeding events were also noted. Other serious toxicities in 10% or more of patients included neutropenia (10%) and infection (12.5%). One patient died of sepsis that was probably related to fistula formation after receiving eight cycles of therapy.

Table 3.
Grade 3 to 5 Toxicities (n = 40)

Association of Polymorphisms With Outcome

DNA samples from a total of 28 patients were available and genotyped. No clinical or pathologic differences were detected between the 28 patients with and the 12 patients without genotyping. The frequencies of the MTHFR, TS, and VEGF polymorphisms are provided in Table 4. The genotype frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, except for the VEGF rs699947 (P < .03). Although this indicates a possible genotyping assay bias, the assay performance was verified in a separate study of healthy controls in which Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was satisfied.

Table 4.
Frequency of TS, MTHFR, and VEGF polymorphisms (n = 28)

Overall survival differed by the MTHFR A1298C SNP (P = .034: Fig 2). The median OS for patients with AC/CC was 32 months compared with 11 months for AA (P = .004). However, this SNP was apparently not associated with TTP (P = .174). The median TTP for AC/CC and AA patients was 6.9 months and 4.1 months, respectively (P = .063).

Fig 2.
Overall survival according to MTHFR A1298C polymorphisms (P = .034, log-rank test adjusted).

Although VEGF G634C SNP also yielded a statistically significant association with overall survival and TTP, only one patient exhibited the VEGF G634C GG genotype, and outcomes by GC and CC genotypes were similar. There were no other significant associations between genotypes and efficacy or toxicity for the other SNPs evaluated in this study.


The investigation of novel agents in SCCHN is of major interest. Although the incorporation of cetuximab into platinum and FU has improved overall survival and other efficacy parameters in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN,9 prognosis remains poor, and treatment-related toxicities are frequently considerable. We studied a novel regimen with pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Our central hypothesis was that bevacizumab can potentiate the antitumor activity of pemetrexed as has been shown for other chemotherapy agents in solid malignancies. Using a non-platinum doublet, we report efficacy results (median TTP of 5 months and median overall survival of 11.3 months) that are at least comparable with those achieved with the combination of platinum, FU, and cetuximab.9 However, we acknowledge the limitations of a comparison between results of a single-arm phase II trial and a large multicenter phase III trial. Furthermore, it is of interest that although pemetrexed has poor activity in SCC of the lung, it appears to be active in SCCHN. Nevertheless, pemetrexed did not improve survival (P = .08) or progression-free survival (P = .166) when added to cisplatin in a phase III trial in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN.15 Subset analysis demonstrated survival benefit in patients with good performance status or oropharyngeal primaries.15 In our study, half the patients had oropharyngeal primaries, which is a favorable prognostic factor in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN3 and may have favorably influenced efficacy results.

Two other clinical trials, one presented in abstract form,30,31 have investigated the combination of an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor with bevacizumab. A phase I/II trial of erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN showed promising results; median overall survival was 7.1 months and progression-free survival was 4.1 months.30 Three bleeding events (one of which was fatal) were reported in 48 patients. In our study, bleeding events were frequent, and six patients had serious bleeding of grade 3 or higher. However, hemorrhagic complications were rare in a phase II trial with cetuximab and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN.31 In patients with SCC of the lung, bevacizumab results in unacceptable rates of serious and fatal bleeding complications, and thus bevacizumab use has been restricted to nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer.32 We observed frequent serious bleeding events in patients treated with pemetrexed and bevacizumab in our study (15%), including two deaths, which is a potential concern for the safety of the regimen. However, this rate of serious bleeding events may not be prohibitive for further evaluation of the pemetrexed/bevacizumab combination in SCCHN, especially given the rarity of other serious adverse events. Hemorrhagic complications are not uncommon in the natural history of SCCHN, and it is sometimes difficult to discern the contribution of study drugs to these events. The application of careful eligibility and re-treatment criteria regarding tumor-related bleeding can potentially reduce the incidence of these events. Ultimately, a randomized comparison of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab will be able to accurately evaluate the added toxicities and benefits with bevacizumab in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. A phase III trial with cisplatin-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab is currently ongoing in the ECOG E1305 trial.

One challenge in the incorporation of new agents into cancer therapeutics has been the identification of reliable and easily reproducible predictive factors. In this study, we conducted an exploratory analysis of MTHFR, TS, and VEGF polymorphisms and their association with efficacy of bevacizumab and pemetrexed combination. Altered reduced folate pools that relate to MTHFR activity may modulate response to antifolates. Here, we observed a significant association between the MTHFR A1298C allele and survival, with homozygous carriers of the common allele (AA) having reduced survival (P = .034). Previously, MTHFR SNPs have been found to be associated with survival in patients with colon cancer,33,34 breast cancer,35 non–small-cell lung cancer,36 and other malignant tumors25; however, some of these studies reported a significant association of the reduced activity of the variant C allele with poorer prognosis. Prospective clinical studies should be performed to validate MTHFR polymorphisms as a predictive or prognostic marker in patients with SCCHN who have been treated with pemetrexed. Biomarkers for antiangiogenesis therapy in SCCHN are also under investigation.30 In our study, we examined several VEGF SNPs, some of which were previously shown to relate to the outcome of patients with breast cancer who had been treated with bevacizumab-containing therapy26; however, our exploratory analysis did not reveal any clinically significant associations.

In conclusion, the addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed showed promising efficacy results in recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Bleeding events were frequent in this study, but some may have been related to the natural history of the disease. The use of MTHFR polymorphisms for treatment individualization warrants further investigation in this setting. Bevacizumab-containing regimens should be further investigated in SCCHN.


Supported in part by Lilly Oncology, Genentech, and the Head and Neck Cancer Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPORE) Grant No. P50 CA097190-06 from the National Cancer Institute.

Presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, June 4-8, 2010, Chicago, IL.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Clinical trial information can be found for the following: NCT00222729.


Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following author(s) indicated a financial or other interest that is relevant to the subject matter under consideration in this article. Certain relationships marked with a “U” are those for which no compensation was received; those relationships marked with a “C” were compensated. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.

Employment or Leadership Position: None Consultant or Advisory Role: Athanassios Argiris, Lilly Oncology (C) Stock Ownership: None Honoraria: Luis E. Raez, Lilly Oncology, Genentech; Panayiotis Savvides, Eli Lilly Research Funding: Athanassios Argiris, Lilly Oncology, Genentech; Luis E. Raez, Lilly Oncology, Genentech; Panayiotis Savvides, Genentech Expert Testimony: None Other Remuneration: None


Conception and design: Athanassios Argiris, Marjorie Romkes

Financial support: Athanassios Argiris

Administrative support: Athanassios Argiris

Provision of study materials or patients: Athanassios Argiris, Luis E. Raez, Panayiotis Savvides

Collection and assembly of data: Athanassios Argiris, Michalis V. Karamouzis, Luis E. Raez, Panayiotis Savvides, Marjorie Romkes

Data analysis and interpretation: Athanassios Argiris, Michalis V. Karamouzis, William E. Gooding, Barton F. Branstetter, Shilong Zhong, Marjorie Romkes

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors


1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. [PubMed]
2. Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Raben D, et al. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2008;371:1695–1709. [PubMed]
3. Argiris A, Li Y, Forastiere A. Prognostic factors and long-term survivorship in patients with recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2004;101:2222–2229. [PubMed]
4. Colevas AD. Chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2644–2652. [PubMed]
5. Morton RP, Rugman F, Dorman EB, et al. Cisplatinum and bleomycin for advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A randomised factorial phase III controlled trial. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1985;15:283–289. [PubMed]
6. Clavel M, Vermorken JB, Cognetti F, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group. Ann Oncol. 1994;5:521–526. [PubMed]
7. Forastiere AA, Metch B, Schuller DE, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1245–1251. [PubMed]
8. Jacobs C, Lyman G, Velez-García E, et al. A phase III randomized study comparing cisplatin and fluorouracil as single agents and in combination for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:257–263. [PubMed]
9. Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F, et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1116–1127. [PubMed]
10. Chattopadhyay S, Moran RG, Goldman ID. Pemetrexed: Biochemical and cellular pharmacology, mechanisms, and clinical applications. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:404–417. [PubMed]
11. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1589–1597. [PubMed]
12. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, von Pawel J, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3543–3551. [PubMed]
13. Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J, et al. Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2636–2644. [PubMed]
14. Pivot X, Raymond E, Laguerre B, et al. Pemetrexed disodium in recurrent locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer. 2001;85:649–655. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Urba S, van Herpen CM, Sahoo TP, et al. Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin (pem/cis) versus placebo plus cisplatin (cis) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell head and neck cancer (HNC) Ann Oncol. 2010;(suppl 8):21. abstr 1003O.
16. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1182–1186. [PubMed]
17. Jain RK. Molecular regulation of vessel maturation. Nat Med. 2003;9:685–693. [PubMed]
18. Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, et al. Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nature. 2000;407:242–248. [PubMed]
19. Jenab-Wolcott J, Giantonio BJ. Bevacizumab: Current indications and future development for management of solid tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009;9:507–517. [PubMed]
20. Jain RK. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med. 2001;7:987–989. [PubMed]
21. Wildiers H, Guetens G, De Boeck G, et al. Effect of antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment on the intratumoral uptake of CPT-11. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1979–1986. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Kyzas PA, Stefanou D, Batistatou A, et al. Prognostic significance of VEGF immunohistochemical expression and tumor angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005;131:624–630. [PubMed]
23. Montag M, Dyckhoff G, Lohr J, et al. Angiogenic growth factors in tissue homogenates of HNSCC: Expression pattern, prognostic relevance, and interrelationships. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1210–1218. [PubMed]
24. Tse GM, Chan AW, Yu KH, et al. Strong immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor predicts overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3558–3565. [PubMed]
25. De Mattia E, Toffoli G. C677T and A1298C MTHFR polymorphisms, a challenge for antifolate and fluoropyrimidine-based therapy personalisation. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1333–1351. [PubMed]
26. Schneider BP, Wang M, Radovich M, et al. Association of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 genetic polymorphisms with outcome in a trial of paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer: ECOG 2100. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4672–4678. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216. [PubMed]
28. Morganti M, Ciantelli M, Giglioni B, et al. Relationships between promoter polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase gene and mRNA levels in colorectal cancers. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2176–2183. [PubMed]
29. Westfall PH, Young SS. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1993. Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Based Adjustment.
30. Cohen EE, Davis DW, Karrison TG, et al. Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase I/II study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:247–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Gibson MK, Kies M, Kim S, et al. Cetuximab (C) and bevacizumab (B) in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An updated report. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(suppl):15s. abstr 6049.
32. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2542–2550. [PubMed]
33. Etienne MC, Formento JL, Chazal M, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and response to fluorouracil-based treatment in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Pharmacogenetics. 2004;14:785–792. [PubMed]
34. Zhang W, Press OA, Haiman CA, et al. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and sex-specific survival in patients with metastatic colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3726–3731. [PubMed]
35. Martin DN, Boersma BJ, Howe TM, et al. Association of MTHFR gene polymorphisms with breast cancer survival. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Smit EF, Burgers SA, Biesma B, et al. Randomized phase II and pharmacogenetic study of pemetrexed compared with pemetrexed plus carboplatin in pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2038–2045. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology