PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Child Neurol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr 1, 2012.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3082578
NIHMSID: NIHMS285444
Levetiracetam for Treatment of Neonatal Seizures
Nicholas S. Abend, MD,1,2 Ana M. Gutierrez-Colina,1 Heather M. Monk, PharmD,3 Dennis J. Dlugos, MD, MSCE,1,2 and Robert R. Clancy, MD1,2
1 Division of Neurology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
2 Department of Neurology, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3 Department of Pharmacy Services, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Author Contributions
NA wrote the first draft. All authors contributed to study design, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. HM participated in subject identification. NA and AG-C participated in data collection.
Corresponding Author: Nicholas S. Abend, MD, Division of Neurology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 ; abend/at/email.chop.edu
Neonatal seizures are often refractory to treatment with initial antiseizure medications. Consequently, clinicians turn to alternatives such as levetiracetam, despite the lack of published data regarding its safety, tolerability, or efficacy in the neonatal population. We report a retrospectively identified cohort of 23 neonates with electroencephalographically confirmed seizures who received levetiracetam. Levetiracetam was considered effective if administration was associated with a greater than 50% seizure reduction within 24 hours. Levetiracetam was initiated at a mean conceptional age of 41 weeks. The mean initial dose was 16 ± 6 mg/kg and the mean maximum dose was 45 ± 19 mg/kg/day. No respiratory or cardiovascular adverse effects were reported or detected. Levetiracetam was associated with a greater than 50% seizure reduction in 35% (8 of 23), including seizure termination in 7. Further study is warranted to determine optimal levetiracetam dosing in neonates and to compare efficacy with other antiseizure medications.
Keywords: neonatal seizures, status epilepticus, levetiracetam, anticonvulsant
Neonatal seizures occur in 1 per 1000 births1 and may adversely impact neurodevelopmental outcome.2 No class A evidence-based guidelines currently exist for the pharmacologic treatment of neonatal seizures,3-5 and management is highly varied.6 Phenobarbital is the most commonly administered antiseizure medication in the neonatal period,6,7 but results in complete termination of electroencephalographically confirmed seizures in less than half of patients when used as a first line medication.8 Other first line medications such as phenytoin and the benzodiazepines are also incompletely efficacious, prompting clinicians to utilize a variety of other antiseizure medication with minimal supporting evidence of safety, tolerability, and efficacy in neonates.9-13
Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug frequently used in chronic epilepsy management and is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in children older than 4 years. It may also have a role in the management of acute symptomatic seizures and status epilepticus in older pediatric9,10,13-19 and adult20-25 populations. Randomized controlled trials have not evaluated the use of levetiracetam in critically ill pediatric patients, including neonates, but levetiracetam is commonly used off-label for neonatal seizures.26 Levetiracetam can easily be administered to neonates because of the oral solution and intravenous formulations. Furthermore, it has little serum protein binding, is not hepatically metabolized, creates no drug-to-drug interactions, and levetiracetam has few known serious adverse side effects, in contrast to other antiseizure medications, which may cause cardiopulmonary depression, arrhythmia, and coagulopathy. These features suggest that levetiracetam could be safe and efficacious in treating neonatal seizures, but neonatal data are needed. We describe the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of levetiracetam in a retrospective cohort of consecutive neonates with electroencephalographically confirmed seizures.
This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive neonates with electrographically confirmed seizures who received intravenous levetiracetam for electro-clinical or electrographic-only (subclinical or nonconvulsive) seizures in the Newborn Infant Intensive Care Unit of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia during a 1-year period (October 2008-October 2009).
Neonates who received levetiracetam were identified by a search of the electronic pharmacy database. Clinical data were obtained from review of electronic hospital records and rereview of electroencephalographic recordings. Data gathered include the following: (1) patient demographics (pregnancy and birth history, gestational age, postnatal age, and neonatal seizure etiology); (2) current medical issues (including neurologic and medical conditions, cardiorespiratory status, and renal function); (3) seizure types (for those with electroclinical seizures); (4) electrographic seizure duration; and (5) antiseizure medication administration including the sequence of drugs, timing, dosing, duration of therapy, and relationship to encephalographic seizure reduction. Per our clinical practice protocol, all neonates with seizures undergo continuous cardiopulmonary monitoring and long-term video-encephalographic monitoring, usually continuing for 24 hours after seizure cessation.
Neonates received initial intravenous levetiracetam bolus doses of 10 to 20 mg/kg. In the absence of strong safety data in neonates at the time levetiracetam was introduced to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, this loading dose was chosen by an institutional drug use evaluation committee based on standard outpatient starting doses. After initial loading, levetiracetam was administered twice per day. Current manufacturer recommendations state that the medication should be diluted in 100 mL of diluent; however, administration of this large volume may be impractical in neonates and concentrations as high as 50 mg/mL have been well tolerated in the pediatric population.27 All bolus and maintenance doses were diluted with normal saline to a concentration of 20 mg/mL. The exact volume depended on the dosing (mg/kg) and patient weight. For example, a 4-kg neonate administered 15 mg/kg would receive a 3 ml bolus. Boluses were administered over 15 minutes. Serum levels of levetiracetam were not obtained in most patients.
Cardiopulmonary adverse effects were considered present if within 2 hours of levetiracetam administration vital sign flow sheets or care notes documented desaturation, reduced respiratory rate, increased ventilator support requirement, arrhythmias, blood pressure, or heart rate increase or decrease by more than 10% compared to the prior 2 hours, or if vasopressors were initiated or increased. Levetiracetam was considered effective if administration was associated with a greater than 50% reduction in electrographic seizures within 24 hours of treatment initiation. The pre-levetiracetam time period varied in duration across subjects based on the time to seizure detection, speed of overall management, and the number of antiseizure medication utilized before levetiracetam.
A total of 23 neonates (11 males and 12 females) received levetiracetam during the 1-year study period (Table 1). Their mean gestational age was 38.7 ± 1.7 weeks (range, 35-41 weeks). Levetiracetam was administered at a mean conceptional age of 40.7 ± 1.5 weeks (range, 38-42 weeks), which corresponded to a mean postnatal age of 14 ± 13 days (range, 0-41 days). The etiologies for their neonatal seizures were hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (8), presumed genetic/metabolic disorders (4), brain malformations (3), central nervous system infections (3), stroke (2), cryptogenic seizures (2), and tumor (1). Clinical seizure types included focal or multifocal clonic or tonic (18), subtle seizures (5), and desaturation/apnea (2). Electrographic-only (nonconvulsive) seizures occurred in 13 neonates, and 10 of these had almost all electrographic-only seizures with very few associated with any clinical change. In all, 12 were reported as electro-graphic status epilepticus.
Table 1
Table 1
Summary of Subjects
Levetiracetam was administered as a first-line antiseizure medication in 4 neonates (17%), second-line in 14 neonates (61%), and third-line or later in 5 neonates (22%). All subjects who received levetiracetam as a second-line medication had received phenobarbital as the first line therapy. Neonates who received levetiracetam as a third-line or later antiseizure medication were administered phenobarbital and phenytoin prior to levetiracetam. The mean initial dose was 16 ± 6 mg/kg (range, 5-22 mg/kg) and the mean maximum dose was 45 ± 19 mg/kg/ day (range, 10-80 mg/kg/day).
No serious cardiopulmonary adverse effects were identified. No patient was discontinued from levetiracetam because of serious or intolerable adverse effects.
Levetiracetam was associated with seizure improvement within 24 hours in 8 of 23 neonates (35%), including termination in 7 of 8 (88%) and reduction by >50% in 1 of 8 (12%). Of the 8 subjects who benefited, levetiracetam was administered as a first-line antiseizure medication in 1 neonate, second-line antiseizure medication in 5 neonates, and third-line antiseizure medication in 2 neonates. Four patients (17%) had improvement within 24 to 72 hours of levetiracetam initiation, including termination in 2 (50%) and reduction by >50% in 2 (50%). There was no seizure reduction in 8 of 23 (35%). The impact could not be evaluated in 3 of 23 subjects (13%) because they received levetiracetam after seizures had already terminated. The maximum mean daily dose administered was not significantly different in neonates with and without benefit (40 ± 12 mg/kg/day vs 48 ± 20 mg/kg/day, unpaired t test P = .78).
Of the 21 patients who survived to discharge, 17 were discharged on levetiracetam (81%). These included 8 of 8 with seizure termination or reduction within 24 hours (5 on only levetiracetam and 3 on levetiracetam and phenobarbital), 8 of the 12 without benefit within 24 hours (0 on only levetiracetam, 5 on levetiracetam and phenobarbital, and 3 on levetiracetam, phenobarbital, and also topiramate or phenytoin), and 1 of the 3 without evaluable effect (only levetiracetam).
Survey data suggest that levetiracetam is commonly recommended by pediatric neurologists managing neonatal seizures,26 despite a paucity of data regarding safety, tolerability, and efficacy. Our retrospective cohort study of 23 neonates with electro-graphically confirmed seizures did not identify any serious adverse cardiopulmonary effects, and levetiracetam was not discontinued in any neonates because of serious adverse events. Levetiracetam was associated with greater than 50% seizure reduction within 24 hours of treatment initiation in 35% of neonates. Of those who benefited, 88% were rendered seizure free.
Levetiracetam's pharmacokinetic profile suggests it could be a useful medication in critically ill neonates with seizures. Neonates have lower serum protein values compared to adults, placing them at an increased risk for toxicity secondary to elevated free drug concentrations of highly protein bound antiseizure medications such as phenytoin, and levetiracetam has minimal protein binding. Furthermore, critically ill neonates with seizures are often receiving polypharmacy and, in contrast to other intravenous antiseizure medications, levetiracetam has no cytochrome P450 drug-drug interactions. Clinical seizure types observed in our retrospective study included focal or multifocal clonic or tonic, and subtle seizures. Levetiracetam is approved by the FDA for use in partial onset seizures, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, myoclonic seizures, and primary generalized tonic clonic seizures, suggesting the potential for benefit in neonates with the types of seizures occurring in our cohort. Finally, in epileptic children, interictal intravenous levetiracetam boluses of up to 60 mg/kg administered over 5 to 6 minutes achieved serum levels of more than 100 mg/ml and resulted in no significant changes in blood pressure, electrocardiographic abnormalities, or local infusion site reactions.27 The observation that intravenous levetiracetam can be delivered quickly and achieve high serum levels suggests a possible role for levetiracetam in the management of acute seizures.
Case series and case reports have described tolerability and possible efficacy of levetiracetam for neonatal seizures, including 2 neonates with seizure administered oral levetiracetam,9 a neonate with intractable malignant migrating partial seizures,10 as a prophylactic antiseizure medication in a neonate with presumed acute symptomatic seizures because of leukemia.12 Slightly more data are available in infants. A case series of 11 children aged 2 days to 9 years with refractory status epilepticus treated with levetiracetam doses of 15 to 70 mg/kg (intravenous in 6, nasogastric in 5) did not result in adverse effects. A total of 5 children, all of whom had received at least 30 mg/kg/ day, had some benefit in a median of 1.5 days.13 Another case series of 28 children under the age of 2 years included some neonates (minimum age 2 weeks) and reported that with a 6.3-month mean duration of treatment, levetiracetam reduced seizures in 54%, including 14% with seizure freedom.11 However, data were not available for the individual neonates. Our data describing a larger consecutive cohort of neonates treated with levetiracetam substantially expands the reported clinical experience with levetiracetam in neonates.
Although there have been no prospective studies comparing levetiracetam to other antiseizure medications, a growing number of retrospective, single-center, open-label case series and case reports have provided additional evidence that levetiracetam may be safe and effective for treating status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures in nonneonatal children. One series described 32 children treated with intravenous levetiracetam (50 mg/kg over 15 minutes) for acute seizures or status epilepticus and reported that all patients had seizure termination within 25 to 30 minutes of infusion.17 A second series reported that intravenous levetiracetam loading doses of 6.5 to 31 mg/kg terminated nonconvulsive status epilepticus in 2 of 2, acute repetitive seizures in 4 of 4, and resulted in temporary seizure termination in 3 with refractory status epilepticus.14 A third series reported 10 children who received intravenous levetiracetam and described status epilepticus termination in 1, status epilepticus improvement in 1, and acute repetitive seizure termination in 2.16 Finally, 2 infants with migrating partial seizures of infancy in refractory status epilepticus had seizure termination within 12 hours of 60 mg/kg intravenous levetiracetam loads.28 None of these series described any adverse effects.14,16,17,28 Additional case reports have reported that levetiracetam resulted in improvement in nonconvulsive status epilepticus15,19,29 and myoclonic status epilepticus18 in children.
Our retrospective cohort study has multiple limitations. First, although no adverse cardiopulmonary events were identified, the retrospective nature of chart review limits firm conclusions about levitiracetam's safety and tolerability. While our safety profile was consistent with other studies of intravenous levetiracetam in critically ill children13,14,16,17 and larger studies of critically ill adults,20-22,24,25,30 there are rare reports of elevations in liver enzymes,25 possible fulminant hepatic failure31 and thrombocytopenia.22,32 This study is too small to detect rare events and we did not perform extensive laboratory testing in a standardized manner. Second, dosing was not standardized, and it is unknown whether dosing was optimal as neonatal pharmacokinetic data are not available. A retrospective series of children with refractory epilepsy reported no correlation between plasma level and efficacy,33 suggesting it may be difficult to identify an optimal dosing regimen. Third, while levetiracetam was associated with a greater than 50% reduction in seizures in 35% of neonates within 24 hours, this small retrospective uncontrolled study does not provide quality efficacy data and merely suggests future prospective study of levetiracetam effectiveness is warranted. Seizures because of acute encephalopathy are known to spontaneously cease over time. Given that levetiracetam was often used as a second or third line antiseizure medication, some of the association with seizure reduction, especially in the 4 neonates with improvement noted in 2 to 3 days, may have simply related to passage of time and not levetiracetam efficacy. Furthermore, because of variation in management, the duration of the pre-levetiracetam period used to calculate pre-levetiracetam seizure burden varied across subjects. Without a placebo group and standardized timing, it is not possible to determine whether some or all seizure improvement relates to the passage of time or levetiracetam administration.
Despite the limitations of this small retrospective observational study, the findings are in agreement with other smaller reported series and suggest that levetiracetam is safe and well-tolerated when administered to critically ill neonates. There is an association with seizure reduction or termination within 24 hours of administration, primarily when used as a second-line antiseizure medication. Additional, larger prospective studies are warranted to define the role of levetiracetam in the management of neonatal seizures. A dose finding study may be needed initially and must include data regarding serum levels of levetiracetam. In our cohort, dosing of 40 mg/kg/day was not associated with major adverse effects and none of the neonates who benefitted from levetiracetam discontinued the medication because of intolerability, so this may be a reasonable dose to study. Consistent with data regarding phenytoin and phenobarbital,8 levetiracetam administration was associated with seizure improvement in less than half of neonates, and this low but expected response rate has implications for sample size calculations in future prospective comparative studies.
Acknowledgments
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article: This work is supported by the NINDS Neurological Sciences Academic Development Award (NSADA) NS049453 to Dr Abend.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the hospital's Institutional Review Board.
1. Glass HC, Pham TN, Danielsen B, et al. Antenatal and intrapartum risk factors for seizures in term newborns: a population-based study, California 1998-2002. J Pediatr. 2009;154:24–28e1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Glass HC, Glidden D, Jeremy RJ, et al. Clinical neonatal seizures are independently associated with outcome in infants at risk for hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. J Pediatr. 2009;155:318–323. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Glass HC, Sullivan JE. Neonatal seizures. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2009;11:405–413. [PubMed]
4. Silverstein FS, Jensen FE. Neonatal seizures. Ann Neurol. 2007;62:112–120. [PubMed]
5. Clancy RR. Summary proceedings from the neurology group on neonatal seizures. Pediatrics. 2006;117:S23. [PubMed]
6. Bartha AI, Shen J, Katz KH, et al. Neonatal seizures: multicenter variability in current treatment practices. Pediatr Neurol. 2007;37:85–90. [PubMed]
7. Wheless JW, Clarke DF, Arzimanoglou A, et al. Treatment of pediatric epilepsy: European expert opinion, 2007. Epileptic Disord. 2007;9:353–412. [PubMed]
8. Painter MJ, Scher MS, Stein AD, et al. Phenobarbital compared with phenytoin for the treatment of neonatal seizures. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:485–489. [PubMed]
9. Shoemaker MT, Rotenberg JS. Levetiracetam for the treatment of neonatal seizures. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:95–98. [PubMed]
10. Hmaimess G, Kadhim H, Nassogne MC, et al. Levetiracetam in a neonate with malignant migrating partial seizures. Pediatr Neurol. 2006;34:55–59. [PubMed]
11. Krief P, Li K, Maytal J. Efficacy of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy younger than 2 years of age. J Child Neurol. 2008;23:582–584. [PubMed]
12. Ledet DS, Wheless JW, Rubnitz JE, et al. Levetiracetam as mono-therapy for seizures in a neonate with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010;14:78–79. [PubMed]
13. Gallentine WB, Hunnicutt AS, Husain AM. Levetiracetam in children with refractory status epilepticus. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;14:215–218. [PubMed]
14. Abend NS, Monk HM, Licht DJ, et al. Intravenous levetiracetam in critically ill children with status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10:505–510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Trabacca A, Profice P, Costanza MC, et al. Levetiracetam in non-convulsive status epilepticus in childhood: a case report. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:639–641. [PubMed]
16. Goraya JS, Khurana DS, Valencia I, et al. Intravenous levetiracetam in children with epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol. 2008;38:177–180. [PubMed]
17. Kirmani BF, Crisp ED, Kayani S, et al. Role of intravenous levetiracetam in acute seizure management of children. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;41:37–39. [PubMed]
18. Haberlandt E, Sigl SB, Scholl-Buergi S, et al. Levetiractam in the treatment of two children with myoclonic status epilepticus. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2009;13:546–549. [PubMed]
19. Alehan F, Ozcay F, Haberal M. The use of levetiracetam in a child with nonconvulsive status epilepticus. J Child Neurol. 2008;23:331–333. [PubMed]
20. Moddel G, Bunten S, Dobis C, et al. Intravenous levetiracetam: a new treatment alternative for refractory status epilepticus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:689–692. [PubMed]
21. Eue S, Grumbt M, Muller M, et al. Two years of experience in the treatment of status epilepticus with intravenous levetiracetam. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;15:467–469. [PubMed]
22. Ruegg S, Naegelin Y, Hardmeier M, et al. Intravenous levetiracetam: treatment experience with the first 50 critically ill patients. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;12:477–480. [PubMed]
23. Szaflarski JP, Meckler JM, Szaflarski M, et al. Levetiracetam use in critically ill patients. Neurocrit Care. 2007;7:140–147. [PubMed]
24. Nau KM, Divertie GD, Valentino AK, et al. Safety and efficacy of levetiracetam for critically ill patients with seizures. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:34–37. [PubMed]
25. Berning S, Boesebeck F, van Baalen A, et al. Intravenous levetiracetam as treatment for status epilepticus. J Neurol. 2009;256:1634–1642. [PubMed]
26. Silverstein FS, Ferriero DM. Off-label use of antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of neonatal seizures. Pediatr Neurol. 2008;39:77–79. [PubMed]
27. Wheless JW, Clarke D, Hovinga CA, et al. Rapid infusion of a loading dose of intravenous levetiracetam with minimal dilution: a safety study. J Child Neurol. 2009;24:946–951. [PubMed]
28. Cilio MR, Bianchi R, Balestri M, et al. Intravenous levetiracetam terminates refractory status epilepticus in two patients with migrating partial seizures in infancy. Epilepsy Res. 2009;86:66–71. [PubMed]
29. Weber P. Levetiracetam in nonconvulsive status epilepticus in a child with Angelman syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2010;25:393–396. [PubMed]
30. Uges JW, van Huizen MD, Engelsman J, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous levetiracetam infusion as add-on in status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2009;50:415–421. [PubMed]
31. Tan TC, de Boer BW, Mitchell A, et al. Levetiracetam as a possible cause of fulminant liver failure. Neurology. 2008;71:685–686. [PubMed]
32. Elouni B, Ben Salem C, Biour M. Levetiracetam-induced pancytopenia. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:985. [PubMed]
33. Giroux PC, Salas-Prato M, Theoret Y, et al. Levetiracetam in children with refractory epilepsy: lack of correlation between plasma concentration and efficacy. Seizure. 2009;18:559–563. [PubMed]