Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcellbiolHomeThe Rockefeller University PressThis articleEditorsContactInstructions for AuthorsThis issue
J Cell Biol. 2011 April 4; 193(1): 201–217.
PMCID: PMC3082179

A presynaptic endosomal trafficking pathway controls synaptic growth signaling


Structural remodeling of synapses in response to growth signals leads to long-lasting alterations in neuronal function in many systems. Synaptic growth factor receptors alter their signaling properties during transit through the endocytic pathway, but the mechanisms controlling cargo traffic between endocytic compartments remain unclear. Nwk (Nervous Wreck) is a presynaptic F-BAR/SH3 protein that regulates synaptic growth signaling in Drosophila melanogaster. In this paper, we show that Nwk acts through a physical interaction with sorting nexin 16 (SNX16). SNX16 promotes synaptic growth signaling by activated bone morphogenic protein receptors, and live imaging in neurons reveals that SNX16-positive early endosomes undergo transient interactions with Nwk-containing recycling endosomes. We identify an alternative signal termination pathway in the absence of Snx16 that is controlled by endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)–mediated internalization of receptors into the endosomal lumen. Our results define a presynaptic trafficking pathway mediated by SNX16, NWK, and the ESCRT complex that functions to control synaptic growth signaling at the interface between endosomal compartments.


Growth factor signaling in neurons controls the expansion of synaptic arbors in response to activity and external stimuli, leading to long-lasting changes in synapse strength and connectivity that underlie learning and memory. Receptor complexes regulating growth factor signal transduction are internalized via endocytosis and directed to specific subcellular membrane compartments from which they exhibit distinct signaling properties, caused by compartment-specific posttranslational modifications and degradative events, or interactions with local binding partners (Sadowski et al., 2009). Therefore, defining the mechanisms by which the rate and direction of the flow of endosomal protein traffic are controlled is critical to determining how neuronal signal transduction pathways are tuned up and down after activation. A host of protein factors control membrane traffic through the interconnected tubules and vesicles of the endosomal system, and sorting occurs by isolation of cargo in membrane domains of defined geometry and lipid composition (Bonifacino and Rojas, 2006). Proteins modulating membrane dynamics and organization are thus well positioned to control the sorting and activities of signaling complexes during endosomal processing.

The Drosophila melanogaster larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) serves as a useful model for the regulation of synaptic growth signaling as the muscle surface area expands 100-fold over 4 d of larval development, requiring increased input from its innervating motor neuron to drive contraction. NMJ synaptic arbors expand by adding matched pre- and postsynaptic specializations (termed synaptic boutons) in response to motor neuron synaptic activity, retrograde signals from the muscle to the neuron, and anterograde signals from the neuron to the muscle (Packard et al., 2002; McCabe et al., 2003; Yoshihara et al., 2005). Mutants in proteins regulating endocytosis fail to properly attenuate growth factor signaling at the NMJ, resulting in abnormal overgrowth of the synaptic arbor, with the hallmark phenotype of increased arbor branching and the formation of “satellite” boutons off the main axis of the axon terminal (Dickman et al., 2006). One such gene, nwk (nervous wreck), encodes a neuron-specific member of the F-BAR (Fes/CIP4 homology Bin-Amphiphysin-Rvs)/SH3 (Src homology 3) family of lipid-binding proteins that control the force-generating assembly of actin filaments at endosomal compartments by activating WASp (Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein)/Arp2/3 (actin-related protein 2/3)-mediated actin polymerization (Coyle et al., 2004). Nwk attenuates the retrograde BMP (bone morphogenic protein) signal mediated by Glass Bottom Boat through its presynaptic receptor Tkv (Thickveins; O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008), colocalizes with the recycling endosome marker Rab11, and functions together with the endosomal GTPase Cdc42 to control WASp/Arp2/3-mediated actin assembly (Rodal et al., 2008). However, the mechanisms by which Nwk attenuates synaptic growth factor signaling at this compartment are unknown.

Here, we describe the identification of a novel Nwk-binding partner, sorting nexin 16 (SNX16). SNX16 is a member of the sorting nexin family of proteins that regulate endosomal traffic and are defined by a phosphoinositide-binding Phox homology (PX) domain (Hanson and Hong, 2003; Choi et al., 2004; Cullen, 2008). We demonstrate that SNX16- and Nwk-containing compartments transiently interact in nerve terminals and that signaling at early endosomes is attenuated either through Nwk–SNX16 interactions or through endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)–mediated internalization into the endosomal lumen. SNX16–Nwk-mediated traffic regulates synaptic growth signaling cascades, including the BMP and Wingless (Wg) pathways, and is specifically required to down-regulate activated receptors. Our results provide a mechanism by which protein traffic between endosomal intermediates at synapses controls the output of signal transduction pathways, leading to synaptic growth.


Nwk physically interacts with SNX16

Nwk is a predicted lipid-binding protein that activates actin polymerization in vitro through WASp/Arp2/3 (Rodal et al., 2008) and, thus, may define an actin-dependent step of endocytosis critical for the down-regulation of growth factor signaling at the Drosophila NMJ. However, the specific mechanism by which it acts is unclear. To elucidate the function of Nwk in membrane traffic, we conducted a yeast two-hybrid screen using full-length Nwk as bait and identified a carboxy-terminal fragment (aa 236–407) of the Drosophila CG6410 gene product as an Nwk-interacting protein. We named this gene Snx16, as it encodes the single Drosophila homologue of the mammalian protein SNX16, which is involved in membrane traffic at endosomal compartments (Hanson and Hong, 2003; Choi et al., 2004). SNX16 homologues are found in animals ranging from insects to mammals (Fig. S1), but neither Snx16 nor nwk is recognizable in Caenorhabditis elegans. Drosophila SNX16 consists of a poorly conserved amino-terminal region, a highly conserved PX domain (which is predicted to bind to phosphoinositides), and a conserved carboxy-terminal coiled-coil domain.

To define the domains of Nwk and SNX16 that are required for their interaction, we generated a series of deletion constructs and assayed their ability to interact in the yeast two-hybrid assay (Fig. 1 A). SNX16–Nwk interactions required a region of the SNX16 coiled-coil domain near the PX domain (aa 346–363). Three glutamate residues in this region are highly conserved in all examined Snx16 homologues (Fig. 1 B), and mutation of these three glutamates to alanine (E347A, E350A, and E351A, hereafter referred to as SNX163A) abolished yeast two-hybrid interactions between full-length Nwk and SNX16 (aa 246–407). The SNX16-binding site on Nwk mapped to aa 637–700, encompassing the second SH3 domain. However, the mutation W677A, which disrupts the ability of this SH3 domain to bind to proline-rich targets (Rodal et al., 2008), did not abolish the Nwk–SNX16 interaction, suggesting that binding is not mediated by canonical interactions of the SH3 domain.

Figure 1.
SNX16 physically interacts with Nwk. (A) Schematic of Nwk and SNX16 domain organization and summary of yeast two-hybrid interactions. (B) Alignment of SNX16 homologues between aa 346 and 363 of Drosophila SNX16. NCBI Protein database accession numbers ...

To validate the Nwk–SNX16 interaction observed in the yeast two-hybrid assay, we conducted GST pull-down assays from Drosophila head extracts. GST-SNX16 (aa 335–407; coiled coil domain) precipitated endogenous Nwk from Drosophila head extracts (Fig. 1 C). Endogenous SNX16 is expressed at low levels and was difficult to detect with our antibodies; therefore, we overexpressed SNX16 or SNX16-GFP using the GAL4/upstream activating sequence (UAS) system (Brand and Perrimon, 1993) and the panneuronal GAL4 driver elavC155 and evaluated the ability of this overexpressed protein to associate with Nwk in Drosophila head extracts. SNX16 and SNX16-GFP each associated specifically with GST-Nwk (aa 1−731) but not GST alone (Fig. 1 D). In addition, GST-Nwk (aa 1–731) coprecipitated with recombinant SNX16 (aa 220–407; PX and coiled-coil domain) from Escherichia coli extracts but only poorly with SNX163A (aa 220–407; Fig. 1 E). As we were unable to detect an association of endogenous SNX16 with Nwk by coimmunoprecipitation (unpublished data) and only a small proportion of SNX16 or Nwk in extracts precipitated with its reciprocal GST-tagged binding partner, we hypothesize that the interaction between Nwk and SNX16 is transient and likely regulated by additional protein- or lipid-binding partners.

SNX16 localizes to early endosomes

Mammalian SNX16 promotes the traffic of growth factor receptors from early to late endosomes (Hanson and Hong, 2003; Choi et al., 2004). To determine the cellular compartment in which Drosophila SNX16 acts, we first localized SNX16 in cultured Drosophila cells. SNX16-GFP and SNX16-mCherry localized to the perimeter of intracellular structures that were distributed throughout the cell interior but excluded from the nucleus (Fig. 2, A and B). Localization of SNX16-GFP to these structures was severely reduced upon treatment with wortmannin, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, which is consistent with the predicted affinity of the SNX16 PX domain for phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and suggests that the PX domain is critical for SNX16 association with endomembranes (Fig. 2 A). We cotransfected cells with SNX16-mCherry or SNX163A-mCherry and tagged markers of early endosomes (GFP-Rab5) and recycling endosomes (GFP-Rab11) and spread them on concanavalin A for a better resolution of internal structures (Rogers et al., 2003). SNX16 colocalized with a subset of Rab5-positive structures (Pearson’s correlation coefficient [PCC] of 0.41 ± 0.11, n = 4) but only poorly with Rab11 (PCC of 0.11 ± 0.01, n = 5; Fig. 2 B). SNX163A-mCherry localization was similar to SNX16-mCherry (Fig. 2 B). We then transfected Drosophila cells with the human transferrin receptor and assessed endocytic uptake of its labeled ligand, transferrin. Transferrin was not recycled back to the cell surface in these cells, as has previously been shown in similar cell types (Van Hoof et al., 2005), but instead accumulated in an intracellular compartment labeled by Rab5 and SNX16 but not Rab11 (PCC of 0.64 vs. 0.45; Fig. 2 C). We conclude that SNX16 resides in an early endosomal compartment that is a functional site of receptor-mediated endocytosis. Finally, we expressed Nwk-GFP in cultured cells. Although other F-BAR proteins induce massive lipid tubulation when expressed in cultured cells (Frost et al., 2009), Nwk localization was primarily cytoplasmic, with occasional faint intracellular puncta. When SNX16–monomeric RFP (mRFP) was coexpressed in these cells, we observed that Nwk-GFP structures overlapped with a small subset of SNX16 puncta (PCC of 0.83 ± 0.01, n = 5; Fig. 2 D). Thus, Nwk and SNX16 partially colocalize in heterologous cells.

Figure 2.
SNX16 localizes to Rab5-positive early endosomes. (A) Kc167 cells transfected with Snx16-GFP were treated with wortmannin and then fixed and imaged by confocal microscopy. Single confocal sections are shown. (B) S2 cells transfected with the indicated ...

We next localized SNX16 at the Drosophila NMJ using the panneuronal GAL4 driver elavC155, as we were unable to detect endogenous Snx16 in embryos or larvae using our antisera (Fig. S2). Both SNX16 and SNX16-GFP localized to several bright puncta in each synaptic bouton, which overlapped well with the early endosomal markers Rab5 and Rab4 (Fig. 3, A and B) but not the recycling endosome marker Rab11 (Fig. 3 C). 80.9 ± 8.6% of SNX16 puncta per NMJ overlapped with Rab5 puncta (n = 5 NMJs), and 77.2 ± 15.1% of SNX16 puncta per NMJ overlapped with Rab4 puncta (n = 4 NMJs). It has previously been reported that the BMP receptor Tkv, which is misregulated in nwk mutants (O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008), resides in Rab5-positive endosomal structures at the NMJ (Wang et al., 2007), and we found that SNX16 puncta colocalized with Tkv-GFP (35.3 ± 10.2% of SNX16 puncta overlapped with Tkv-GFP puncta; n = 5 NMJs; Fig. 3 D). SNX16-GFP also colocalized with the presynaptic portion of Hrs (Lloyd et al., 2002), a component of the ESCRT complex that drives internalization of cargo into the endosomal lumen (Fig. 3 E). 49.4 ± 3.7% of SNX16-GFP puncta overlapped with Hrs puncta (n = 5 NMJs, note that Hrs is predominantly postsynaptic with a more minor presynaptic component [Lloyd et al., 2002] and that only this fraction of presynaptic Hrs puncta contain neuronally expressed SNX16). Finally, immunoelectron microscopy with anti-GFP antibodies detected both SNX16-GFP and SNX163A-GFP on the outside surface of ~200-nm diameter compartments at the NMJ (Fig. 3 F), in which internal vesicles could sometimes be seen. Thus, we conclude that SNX16 localizes primarily to early endosomes and multivesicular bodies (MVBs), which are sites of receptor traffic at the Drosophila larval NMJ.

Figure 3.
Localization of SNX16 to endosomes at the Drosophila NMJ. (A) elavC155;UAS-Snx16;UAS-GFP-Rab5 larvae stained with α-SNX16 antibodies. (B) elavC155;UAS-Snx16-GFP;UAS-mRFP-Rab4 larvae. (C) elavC155;UAS-Snx16-GFP larvae stained with α-Rab11 ...

Nwk localizes to a novel compartment that transiently interacts with SNX16 endosomes at the NMJ

In fixed tissue, Nwk localizes to a synaptic subdomain termed the “periactive zone” (Roos and Kelly, 1999; Sone et al., 2000) that closely surrounds sites of synaptic vesicle release. SNX16-GFP puncta localized within or adjacent to Nwk-positive periactive zones in fixed NMJs, but it was difficult to infer the nature of their functional relationship from this localization. We reasoned that analysis of the dynamic localization of SNX16 and Nwk relative to each other would provide more information about their relationship. Panneuronally expressed Nwk-mRFP (Fig. 4 A; previously described in O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008) rescues the temperature-sensitive seizure phenotype of nwk mutant adult Drosophila (not depicted), suggesting that it encodes a functional protein. In contrast to the periactive zone localization of either endogenous or overexpressed α-Nwk immunoreactivity in fixed tissue (Coyle et al., 2004; Rodal et al., 2008), Nwk-mRFP localized diffusely in live nerve terminals, with several bright puncta per NMJ (2.6 ± 0.5 particles/NMJ on muscle 6/7 in segments A2 and A3, n = 5 NMJs; Fig. 4 B). However, when these samples were fixed and extracted with detergents for antibody staining, mRFP fluorescence collapsed toward more defined structures in each bouton similar to endogenous or overexpressed untagged Nwk, and bright puncta were difficult to distinguish in or near these structures (Fig. 4 C). Because we had not previously identified these Nwk puncta in fixed tissue, we stained fixed extracted Nwk-mRFP larvae with anti-Nwk and anti-mRFP antibodies (Fig. 4 C and not depicted). Neither antibody recognized Nwk-mRFP puncta in fixed extracted tissue, suggesting that the Nwk puncta are in a structure that is poorly accessible to antibodies and disrupted upon detergent extraction. These results suggest that the previously described periactive zone localization of Nwk is likely triggered by fixation and extraction and that the diffuse and occasionally punctate localization of Nwk-mRFP observed in live tissue reflects a physiologically relevant pattern.

Figure 4.
Nwk in live NMJs localizes to puncta that transiently interact with SNX16 endosomes. (A) elavC155;Nwk-mRFP expression in α-Nwk IBs of Drosophila larval fillet extracts. The single asterisk indicates endogenous Nwk; the double asterisk indicates ...

To further understand the nature of the Nwk compartment, we colocalized Nwk-mRFP with GFP-Rab11. Nwk and Rab11 colocalize in fixed cells (Rodal et al., 2008), and Rab11 is a marker of the recycling endosome. GFP-Rab11 exhibited a very similar pattern in live NMJs to Nwk-mRFP (largely diffuse with occasional puncta), and many GFP-Rab11 puncta colocalized (Fig. 4 D) and moved together (not depicted) with Nwk-mRFP puncta. Thus, the Nwk compartment has features of a recycling endosome, which in diverse cell types, acts to recycle endocytosed cargo from early endosomes to the plasma membrane.

We imaged the dynamics of Nwk and SNX16 compartments using spinning-disk confocal microscopy to rapidly record their positions. Nwk-mRFP and SNX16-GFP particles moved within synaptic boutons with no apparent directionality. Nwk puncta made frequent contact with SNX16 puncta, and sometimes Nwk and SNX16 puncta translocated together within the bouton for several seconds and then separated (Fig. 4 E and Videos 1, 2, and 3). In each NMJ, Nwk particles contacted SNX16 particles a mean of 1.2 ± 0.40 times/min or 0.78 ± 0.45 times/min/Nwk particle (n = 14 particles in five NMJs). These results suggest that Nwk and SNX16 exist in independent compartments that transiently interact, perhaps leading to an exchange of cargo.

Transfer of cargo-containing membranes is likely to require a scission event, and Nwk interacts with dynamin (O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008; Rodal et al., 2008), a GTPase that drives membrane scission (Mettlen et al., 2009). We therefore reasoned that acute inhibition of dynamin with the small molecule inhibitor dynasore (Macia et al., 2006) might block the transfer of membranes between SNX16 and Nwk compartments. To validate the use of dynasore in Drosophila, we tested whether dynasore treatment mimics the synaptic vesicle endocytosis defects in the dynamin mutant Shibirets1, which exhibits progressive rundown of the evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) during high-frequency stimulation of the nerve (Delgado et al., 2000), whereas wild-type NMJs decline to a semisteady state that is sustained by vesicle recycling. Indeed, dynasore (but not vehicle treatment) causes a progressive rundown of EPSCs (Fig. S3). To test the role of dynamin in Nwk–SNX16 particle interactions, we treated dissected larvae with dynasore under conditions that cycle through the entire NMJ pool of dynamin (Ramaswami et al., 1994) and then fixed them without extraction for the imaging of puncta. We found that 53.9 ± 8.4% of Nwk-mRFP particles colocalized or collapsed adjacent to an SNX16-GFP particle upon treatment with dynasore (n = 59 particles in 15 NMJs; Fig. 4 F). In contrast, only 17 ± 7.6% of Nwk-mRFP particles were found colocalizing or near to an SNX16-GFP particle in control DMSO treatments (n = 35 particles in 16 NMJs; Fig. 4 F). Thus, dynamic interactions between Nwk and SNX16 particles in NMJs depend on dynamin, suggesting that their associations may lead to an exchange of membrane and/or cargo between compartments.

Nwk attenuates the growth-promoting activity of SNX16

To explore the function of SNX16 at the NMJ using genetics, we overexpressed Snx16-GFP and the Nwk-binding mutant Snx163A-GFP in the nervous system using the GAL4 driver elavC155. Wild-type Snx16-GFP–overexpressing larval NMJs exhibit a small but significant increase in bouton number compared with wild-type controls (Fig. 5, A–D). However, when we overexpressed Snx163A-GFP, we observed a much more dramatic NMJ overgrowth phenotype with excessive branching of axon terminal arbors similar to the nwk mutant phenotype, with an increase in both overall bouton number and satellite bouton number (Fig. 5, A–D). We recapitulated this result with two independent transgenic insertions of Snx163A-GFP (Fig. 5, B–D) and verified that expression levels were similar between wild-type and mutant transgenes (not depicted).

Figure 5.
A Nwk-binding mutant of Snx16 recapitulates the nwk phenotype. (A) Representative confocal projections of anti-complexin (Cpx) staining from NMJs of the indicated genotype under the control of the elavC155 GAL4 driver. (B) Quantification of the mean bouton ...

To evaluate whether the overexpression phenotype of Snx16-GFP was related to its function with Nwk, we tested whether cooverexpression of Nwk could alter the synaptic overgrowth phenotype of SNX16 overexpression. Nwk overexpression on its own does not cause a synaptic growth phenotype (Fig. 5 E; O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008; Rodal et al., 2008). We found that cooverexpression of Nwk-mRFP (but not a control RFP transgene) suppresses the synaptic overgrowth phenotype resulting from overexpression of wild-type Snx16-GFP but notably not Snx163A-GFP (Fig. 5 E), suggesting that the Snx16 phenotype results from an imbalance in specific Nwk–SNX16 physical interactions and substantiating these interactions in vivo. Finally, we tested whether BMP signaling, which is up-regulated in Nwk mutants (O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008), was also increased upon overexpression of Snx16 by measuring the levels of the Trio protein, a Rac GTPase exchange factor whose expression is directly increased by BMP signals (Ball et al., 2010). Trio protein levels were increased at the NMJ in Snx16-GFP and Snx163A-GFP–expressing larvae (Fig. 5 E). These results suggest that interactions of Snx16 with Nwk are critical for the attenuation of synaptic growth signals downstream of BMP signaling.

Two models are consistent with the synaptic overgrowth phenotype resulting from Snx163A-GFP overexpression. One interpretation is that Snx16 positively regulates and acts upstream of Nwk together with some additional factor, and upon overexpression of Snx163A-GFP, this factor is titrated away from endogenous Nwk, resulting in an nwk loss-of-function phenotype. The second interpretation is that nwk negatively regulates Snx16, and SNX163A-GFP is thus an overactive form of the protein that drives unregulated synaptic growth. To distinguish the order in which nwk and Snx16 act, we generated loss-of-function alleles of Snx16. In the first model, nwk;Snx16 double mutants would be expected to phenocopy nwk mutants. In the second model, nwk;Snx16 mutants would be expected to phenocopy Snx16 mutants.

We used two complementary sources for loss-of-function alleles of SNX16. First, we obtained a PiggyBac transposable element insertion (PBac[RB]CG6410e01600) that disrupts the coding region of Snx16 (Snx16PB) 366 bp downstream of the Snx16 start codon (Fig. 6 A). This allele reduces the Snx16 transcript to 1% of the wild-type level in quantitative RT-PCR, but does not affect the adjacent gene CG10934 (Fig. 6 B). Second, we imprecisely excised a P element (P[EPgy2]EY10175) inserted 51 bp 5′ of the predicted transcriptional start site of Snx16, resulting in the deletion of the entire SNX16-coding region (Fig. 6 A). Animals containing heterozygous combinations of Snx16 mutant alleles with each other and with the 20-gene deficiency Df(2R)Exel7150 were viable and fertile. We examined NMJ morphology in these animals and found no statistically significant phenotype compared with genetically matched controls (Fig. 6, C and D), although there was a trend toward reduced synaptic growth.

Figure 6.
Loss of SNX16 suppresses the nwk mutant phenotype. (A) Schematic of snx16 loss-of-function mutants. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR of Snx16 and CG10934 transcript levels. n = 6 for each sample. (C) Quantification of the mean satellite bouton number for muscle ...

To examine the genetic relationship between nwk and Snx16, we generated double mutants of the null allele nwk2 (Coyle et al., 2004) with Snx16 mutants and found that allelic combinations of Snx16PB, Snx16Δ1, and Snx16Δ2 significantly suppressed synaptic overgrowth in nwk2 mutant larvae compared with genetically matched controls (Fig. 6, C and D). The nwk mutant synaptic overgrowth phenotype was restored in Snx16;nwk double mutants by reexpression of wild-type Snx16 in neurons (Fig. 6 C), though we note that this rescue construct also produces mild synaptic overgrowth phenotypes in a wild-type background (Fig. 5 A). Collectively, our results show that multiple different loss-of-function alleles of Snx16 suppress the nwk mutant phenotype. We also tested whether up-regulated BMP signaling in nwk2 (O’Connor Giles et al., 2008) was suppressed by Snx16 and found that both phosphorylated Mad (mothers against decapentaplegic, the downstream target of BMP receptors) and Trio protein levels at the NMJ were increased in nwk and suppressed in Snx16PB;nwk2 (Fig. 6 E). These results rule out the model that Snx16 acts as an upstream activator of Nwk, as in that case, Snx16 mutants would be expected to phenocopy the nwk mutant, and instead indicate that synaptic overgrowth in nwk mutants results from a failure to down-regulate the growth-promoting activity of Snx16.

Snx16 is required for synaptic growth mediated by the BMP and Wg signaling cascades

Synaptic growth at the Drosophila larval NMJ requires the coordinated activities of several signal transduction cascades (Marqués and Zhang, 2006). One such pathway has been demonstrated to function downstream of Nwk (O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008) and acts downstream of a retrograde signal mediated by the BMP family member Glass Bottom Boat and its receptors Tkv, Wit (Wishful Thinking), and Saxophone (Marqués and Zhang, 2006). Another prominent pathway is the presynaptic component of a cascade mediated by Wg and its receptors dFz2 (Frizzled 2) and Arrow (Franco et al., 2004; Miech et al., 2008). We tested whether Snx16 functions to promote signaling in these two pathways by generating double mutants between Snx16 and BMP and Wg pathway mutants.

Dad (daughters against decapentaplegic) is a negative regulator of BMP signaling, and loss-of-function mutations in dad cause excessive BMP signaling and synaptic overgrowth (Sweeney and Davis, 2002; O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008). Loss of Snx16 strongly suppressed synaptic overgrowth in dad mutants (Fig. 7 A). In addition, the synaptic overgrowth phenotypes caused by overexpression of Snx16-GFP and Snx163A-GFP were both suppressed by loss-of-function mutations in wit, the BMP receptor. These results suggest that, like nwk, synaptic growth mediated by Snx16 requires BMP signaling. To test the involvement of the Wg pathway, we used sgg (shaggy)/glycogen synthase kinase-3β, which is negatively regulated by Wg. A dominant-negative Sgg mutant (sggDN) expressed in neurons mimics the presynaptic component of activated Wg signaling and causes synaptic overgrowth (Franco et al., 2004). Mutation of Snx16 suppressed synaptic overgrowth caused by sggDN (Fig. 7 B). Nwk has not previously been implicated in Wg signaling, so we tested whether the synaptic overgrowth phenotype in nwk requires the activity of the Wg pathway, Loss-of-function mutations in arrow, the Wg coreceptor, cause only subtle synaptic growth defects (Fig. 7 B; Miech et al., 2008) but strongly suppress synaptic overgrowth in nwk, similar to results with nwk and BMP pathway mutants that have previously implicated Nwk in BMP signaling (O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008; Rodal et al., 2008). These results suggest that BMP- and Wg-mediated synaptic growth requires Snx16 and that Nwk–SNX16-mediated membrane traffic is broadly used to constrain a variety of synaptic growth signals.

Figure 7.
Snx16 is required for synaptic growth mediated by BMP and Wg cascades. (A) Quantification of the mean bouton number for muscle 6/7 NMJs from larvae defective in BMP signaling. (B) Quantification of the mean satellite bouton number for muscle 4 NMJs defective ...

Overexpression of an activated version of the BMP receptor TkvQ199D, which signals in the absence of a ligand and coreceptor (Wieser et al., 1995; Hoodless et al., 1996), enhances the synaptic overgrowth phenotype of nwk mutants (O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008). We tested whether this mutant receptor might elucidate the fate of signaling receptors in the absence of Nwk–SNX16 interactions by cooverexpressing it in the Snx16-GFP– and Snx163A-GFP–overexpressing backgrounds. Strikingly, we found that tkvQ199D dramatically enhanced the synaptic overgrowth phenotype of Snx163A-GFP but had no effect on Snx16-GFP (Fig. 7 C), suggesting that activated receptors were acutely sensitive to Nwk–SNX16-mediated traffic. Previously, we and others have not been able to detect rerouting of endogenous or overexpressed wild-type–signaling receptors at steady state in nwk mutant NMJs (O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008; Rodal et al., 2008). We reasoned that the activated receptor, which is sensitive to this genetic background, might reveal a subpopulation of the redistributed receptor. Indeed, we found that TkvQ199D (but not endogenous Tkv) was primarily found at the plasma membrane at steady state in Snx16-GFP–expressing NMJs but accumulated in intracellular structures, including Snx16-positive endosomes in Snx163A-GFP–expressing NMJs (Fig. 7 D), suggesting that TkvQ199D is specifically rerouted in this mutant, resulting in increased signaling.

Hrs down-regulates receptor signaling in the absence of SNX16

Although a dominant active Nwk-binding mutant of SNX16 promotes synaptic growth, loss-of-function Snx16 mutants suppress synaptic growth, suggesting that SNX16 has a growth-promoting activity at the early endosome separate from its negative regulatory Nwk-binding activity. We hypothesized that because SNX16 is a peripheral membrane protein on endosomes, it may act by limiting the internalization of activated receptors into MVBs via the ESCRT pathway (Raiborg and Stenmark, 2009). In this model (Fig. 8 A), attenuation of receptor signaling is balanced between SNX16–Nwk-mediated sorting to the recycling endosome and ESCRT-mediated internalization of the receptor into the endosomal lumen, with SNX16 representing a branch point between these two pathways. We predicted that if MVB formation were inhibited, Snx16 loss-of-function mutants would produce synaptic overgrowth, the opposite phenotype from that of Snx16;nwk, Snx16;dad, or Snx16;sggDN double mutants. To test this hypothesis, we made double mutants between Snx16 and hrsD28, a mutant in a component of the ESCRT machinery (Lloyd et al., 2002). Hrs is broadly used in many cell types for endosomal cargo traffic, and both hrs single and hrs;Snx16 double mutants are sick and die between early larval and early pupal stages. We examined NMJ growth in single and double mutants. hrs mutants have been shown to have no defect in synaptic growth (Lloyd et al., 2002); however, hrs;Snx16 double mutants exhibited significant overproliferation of overall bouton number and satellite bouton number compared with hrs single mutants (Fig. 8 B), which is in sharp contrast to the reduction in synaptic growth in the Snx16 mutant backgrounds (Figs. 6 and and7).7). These results suggest that receptor signaling in Snx16 animals is attenuated by internalization into the endosomal lumen, whereas animals containing wild-type Snx16 do not depend on MVB function to attenuate signaling, presumably because of SNX16–Nwk-mediated sorting to the recycling endosome.

Figure 8.
A branched pathway model for the attenuation of synaptic growth signals by endosomal traffic. (A) Model depicting how Nwk and SNX16 may drive tubulation-based sorting of synaptic growth receptors from the signal-permissive early endosome to the recycling ...

To further explore the relationship between MVB formation and Snx16 function, we used electron microscopy to examine the ultrastructure of synaptic boutons in Snx16-GFP– and Snx163A-GFP–overexpressing larvae, in which synaptic overgrowth is apparent (Fig. 5). Morphologically distinct MVBs are rarely observed in thin sections of wild-type synaptic boutons by electron microscopy but were frequently observed in Snx163A-GFP–overexpressing boutons (Fig. 8 C). We hypothesize that this increase in MVB formation results from stalled membrane traffic at the early endosome when SNX16–Nwk-mediated traffic is disrupted. Collectively, these results support a model in which SNX16 functions at the intersection of a branch point in the endosomal traffic of synaptic growth receptors from the early endosome to either the recycling endosome or to a degradative MVB pathway.


Endocytic membrane traffic regulates signaling by synaptic growth factor receptors and may be used as a point of control in tuning receptor traffic in response to neuronal activity. The neuronal F-BAR/SH3 protein Nwk is involved in endocytic membrane traffic that attenuates synaptic growth signaling, but the mechanism by which it acts has been unknown. Here, we identify a physical interaction between Nwk and the early endosomal protein SNX16 that is critical for down-regulating the synaptic growth-promoting activity of SNX16. This interaction may bring together the actin-polymerizing activity of the first SH3 domain of Nwk (Rodal et al., 2008) with the potential lipid-binding/tubulating activities of the F-BAR domain of Nwk and the PX domain of SNX16, driving tubule-based membrane flux from early to recycling endosomes.

Function of the interaction between Nwk and SNX16

Sorting nexins form a large family of proteins that share a common phosphoinositide-binding PX domain and are involved in diverse aspects of membrane traffic (Cullen, 2008). The best-characterized members of this family are the sorting nexin–BAR family, including Snx1 (tied to endosome-to-Golgi traffic) and Snx9 (tied to the internalization step of endocytosis), which each contains both a lipid-tubulating BAR domain and a PX domain. Crystal structures and functional studies of Snx9 have shown that its BAR and PX domains form a single lipid-binding and -deforming module with combined specificities that neither domain exhibits alone (Pylypenko et al., 2007; Yarar et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008a). As such, SNX16–Nwk interactions may form an analogous F-BAR/PX module via an intermolecular rather than intramolecular interaction. We have not been able to purify sufficient amounts of SNX16 to directly test its effects on lipid binding by Nwk; therefore, further analysis of their interaction will require an approach to isolate SNX16 in vitro. Interestingly, the SNX16–Nwk interaction depends on a region of Nwk surrounding its second SH3 domain, raising the possibility that this region of Nwk may exert intramolecular effects on the amino-terminal F-BAR domain, as has previously been shown for other F-BAR proteins (Rao et al., 2010). Furthermore, Nwk binds to the coiled-coil region of SNX16 (Fig. 1), which is involved in SNX16 dimerization (Hanson and Hong, 2003; Choi et al., 2004), suggesting that Nwk may act on SNX16 by affecting its dimerization state.

Mammalian SNX16 has been implicated in the trafficking of the EGF receptor from early to late endosomes, which may mediate down-regulation of receptor signaling (Hanson and Hong, 2003; Choi et al., 2004). However, the mechanism by which SNX16 promotes this trafficking step is not understood and no loss-of-function studies on SNX16 have been reported. A mutant of mammalian SNX16 that lacks 60 aa corresponding to the Drosophila SNX16 Nwk-binding site (Fig. 1 B) blocks trafficking of SNX16 and EGF to late endosomes, leading to increased EGF signaling (Hanson and Hong, 2003). Interestingly, the F-BAR protein FBP17 has been reported to interact with SNX2 (Fuchs et al., 2001). These results raise the possibility that BAR family–sorting nexin interactions may be broadly used to control membrane traffic in cells.

Synaptic growth signaling is attenuated by transient interactions between SNX16 and Nwk compartments

We found that Drosophila SNX16 localizes to an early endosomal compartment at the NMJ defined by the small GTPases Rab4 and Rab5 (Figs. 2 and and3).3). This compartment accumulates signaling receptors, such as the BMP receptors Tkv and Wit (Fig. 3; Wang et al., 2007), and signaling is amplified when receptors are stalled in this compartment (Wang et al., 2007), suggesting that the SNX16 compartment is an active site of signaling. By identifying specific Snx16 mutants that disrupt interactions with Nwk, we were able to separate the requirements for receptor down-regulation at early endosomes and show that activated receptors specifically require SNX16–Nwk-mediated traffic to recycle to the plasma membrane (Fig. 7).

We previously observed that Nwk colocalizes with the recycling endosome marker Rab11 in fixed tissue and cooperates with Cdc42, which is thought to function at the recycling endosome, to activate WASp/Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization (Rodal et al., 2008). Together with the result that rab11 mutants exhibit synaptic overgrowth similar to nwk mutants (Khodosh et al., 2006), we concluded that Nwk functions at recycling endosomes, which are downstream of early endosomes. Here, we show that Nwk tagged with fluorescent proteins localizes to novel punctate structures in heterologous cells (Fig. 2) and nerve terminals (Fig. 4). These puncta had not been observed using anti-Nwk antibodies against either endogenous or overexpressed Nwk in fixed tissue (Rodal et al., 2008), as they are poorly preserved upon fixation (Fig. 4). In living synapses, Rab11 colocalizes with Nwk to mobile puncta, SNX16-containing early endosomes interact transiently with Nwk puncta, and inhibition of the GTPase dynamin blocks separation of these compartments (Fig. 4). Dynamin inhibition has previously been shown to disrupt endosomal function in the fly NMJ (Wucherpfennig et al., 2003), so we cannot be certain that the collapse of SNX16–Nwk compartments under these conditions is caused by the specific interactions of these proteins with dynamin. However, because SNX16–Nwk interactions lead to the down-regulation of synaptic growth signals, our data are consistent with a model in which the exchange of receptors from the SNX16 endosome to the Nwk/Rab11 endosome leads to the attenuation of receptor signaling. Binding of Nwk to the cytoplasmic tail of the BMP receptor Tkv may mediate this event (O’Connor-Giles et al., 2008), but further experiments will be required to directly examine cargo transfer in the future. Because there are significant cytoplasmic pools of both Nwk and SNX16, we also cannot exclude the contribution of these soluble proteins to membrane traffic in the nerve terminal or the possibility that overexpression of Nwk and Snx16 to visualize live trafficking events does not faithfully recapitulate the behaviors of endogenous proteins. However, the transient interaction of Nwk and SNX16 puncta correlates well with our genetic results showing that nwk attenuates a synaptic growth-promoting activity of Snx16 at early endosomes.

Because Nwk- and SNX16-labeled compartments transiently interact in nerve terminals, temporal control of the interaction between their lipid-binding domains may provide a mechanism to acutely drive membrane tubulation in a regulated fashion. Furthermore, the association of SNX16 with endosomes depends on phosphoinositides, as the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin disrupts localization of SNX16 in cultured cells (Fig. 2), indicating that regulation of phospholipid composition may also contribute to the membrane-deforming activities of SNX16 and Nwk.

Snx16 acts at a branch point between endosomal sorting pathways

We found that Snx16 loss-of-function mutants suppress synaptic overgrowth resulting from loss of Nwk-mediated traffic as well as from activation of Wg and BMP signaling pathways (Figs. 6 and and7).7). These data suggest that SNX16 plays an active role in promoting synaptic growth at the endosome, aside from its function in signal attenuation through Nwk. We found that Snx16 is required to restrict synaptic growth when MVB formation is hampered in hrs mutants (Fig. 8), suggesting that receptor entry into the endosomal lumen is an alternative signal attenuation pathway. Furthermore, we found that overexpression of a mutant Snx16 that cannot bind Nwk promotes the accumulation of endosomal structures at the NMJ (Figs. 7 D and 8 C) and drives excess synaptic growth, suggesting that Snx16 may play a role in MVB maturation and acts at the branch point between endosomal sorting pathways. Defining the mechanism by which SNX16 promotes synaptic growth will require further structure–function analysis of the active domains of the protein aside from its Nwk-binding coiled coil.

Activity dependence of synaptic receptor endocytosis

Traffic through endocytic compartments has proven to be a critical point of regulation in the nervous system. Synaptic vesicle endocytosis is controlled by synaptic activity through calcium-dependent dephosphorylation of endocytic proteins (Cousin, 2009), and postsynaptic trafficking of AMPA receptors through the recycling endosome is increased in response to activity via the calcium-dependent motor myosin V (Wang et al., 2008b). Rab5-positive compartments at the Drosophila NMJ have been previously characterized for their role in the synaptic vesicle cycle (Wucherpfennig et al., 2003), and it will be interesting to determine how receptor-mediated endocytosis and synaptic vesicle endocytosis are coordinately or separately regulated in response to activity. Synaptic growth at the Drosophila NMJ is positively regulated by calcium influx through voltage-gated calcium channels (Rieckhof et al., 2003), and endosome number increases in response to activity (Akbergenova and Bykhovskaia, 2009). It is tempting to speculate that calcium influx acts through conserved mechanisms for modulating membrane dynamics to delay the attenuation of receptor signaling by SNX16–Nwk-mediated traffic, leading to increased synapse growth in response to activity. A key future goal will be to determine specific points of activity-dependent regulation of membrane traffic in presynaptic endosomes.

Materials and methods

Fly stocks and generation of Snx16 mutants

Flies were cultured using standard media and techniques. UAS-Snx16 and UAS-Snx16-GFP lines were constructed in pUAST (Brand and Perrimon, 1993) carrying the Snx16 cDNA (clone SD19533; Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project), and point mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis. Sequence-verified constructs were injected into w1118 flies at the Duke Model Systems Transgenic Facility or at Genetic Services, Inc. The P element line P(EPgy2)EY10175, carrying an insertion 39 bp 5′ to the Snx16 start codon, was isogenized and crossed to w;P/CyOΔ2-3 to mobilize the insertion. Approximately 500 candidate white-eyed lines were tested by PCR across the P element insertion site, and Snx16Δ lines and a precise excision (Snx16Δpre) were verified by sequencing across the deletion. Nwk-mRFP and TkvQ199D lines were obtained from K. O’Connor-Giles (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI), and Tkv-GFP flies were obtained from M. González-Gaitán (University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland). All other fly strains were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center or the Exelixis Collection (Harvard Medical School).


Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a real-time PCR system (7300 Real-Time PCR System; Applied Biosystems). Total RNA was extracted from 10–15 adult flies per sample, single-stranded cDNA was synthesized, and PCR was performed in triplicate for each of two independent total RNA samples per genotype using an SYBR green PCR master mix (QuantiTect; QIAGEN). A final dissociation step was performed to evaluate product integrity, and reaction samples were run on a 1.2% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The primer sequences were as follows: Act88F, 5′-ACTTCTGCTGGAAGGTGGAC-3′ and 5′-ATCCGCAAGGATCTGTATGC-3′; Snx16, 5′-ACTGCGCGAGGAGATGAACGA-3′ and 5′-CTCCGATTGGCGAAGGTCTACT-3′; and CG10934, 5′-TGAAAGAGCAGAGCCAACACG-3′ and 5′-CGACACAACGCTCTTCTTCTTCTC-3′.


A fragment of Snx16 encoding aa 230–408 was cloned into pGEX-4T (Promega), expressed in BL21(DE3) E. coli, and purified from sarkosyl-solubilized extracts using glutathione agarose followed by resolubilization in Triton X-100 (Frangioni and Neel, 1993). The purified fusion protein was dialyzed into PBS and injected into guinea pigs (Invitrogen). Guinea pig sera were then affinity purified against a His-tagged fragment of SNX16 encoding aa 335–407, purified as previously described for the His-tagged WASp WH1 domain using the antigen immobilized on nitrocellulose (Rodal et al., 2008), and used at 1:250 for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and at 1:1,000 for immunoblots (IBs). α-Tkv antibodies (1:200 for IHC) were provided by M.B. O’Connor (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN). α-Nwk (antibody 970; 1:1,000 for IHC and 1:2,000 for IBs; Coyle et al., 2004), α-Dap160 (1:20,000 for IBs; provided by G. Davis, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Roos and Kelly, 1998), polyclonal α-mRFP (1:250 for IHC; Takara Bio Inc.), α-GFP (1:1,000 for IBs; Abcam), α-Hrs (1:1,000 for IHC; provided by H. Bellen, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Lloyd et al., 2002), α-phospho–Mad PS1 (1:1,000 for IHC; provided by P. Ten Dijk, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands; Persson et al., 1998), α-Trio (1:10 for mAb supernatant IHC; Awasaki et al., 2000), and α-Rab11 (1:100 for IHC; BD; Khodosh et al., 2006) antibodies have been described previously. All mAb’s were provided by the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (University of Iowa). Secondary antibodies for imaging were conjugated to Cy2 or Rhodamine Red-X (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.).

Yeast two-hybrid and GST pull-down assays

Yeast two-hybrid assays were conducted using the Matchmaker system (Takara Bio Inc.). Full-length Nwk was cloned into pAS2-1, transformed into yeast strain AH109, and used to screen 1.5 × 106 transformants of a pACT2 Matchmaker library generated from whole Drosophila adult cDNA (Takara Bio Inc.) for growth on minimal media lacking leucine, tryptophan, histidine, and adenine. Candidate colonies were further selected for growth on the aforementioned media containing 10 mM 3-aminotriazole. DNA from colonies passing this secondary screen was purified and retransformed into AH109 yeast cells carrying plasmid pGBKT7-NWK. Directed two-hybrid tests were conducted with NWK constructs in pGBKT7 (Rodal et al., 2008) and Snx16 constructs in pACT2 (Takara Bio Inc.). The Nwk SH3a point mutant W581A and the SH3b point mutant W677A were previously described (Rodal et al., 2008). Yeast cells containing both prey and bait constructs were selected on minimal media lacking leucine and tryptophan and then restruck on plates lacking histidine and containing 3-aminotriazole. Yeast colonies were scored for growth after 3 d at 30°C.

GST pull-down assays were conducted as previously described (Rodal et al., 2008). In brief, GST fusions were purified from bacterial lysates in PBS with 0.5 mM dithiothreitol and used to precipitate binding partners from wild-type and elav-Gal4C155;UAS-Snx16-GFP or UAS-Snx16 fly head extracts made in 25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 75 mM NaCl, and 0.2% Nonidet P-40 (Fig. 1, C and D) or from BL21 DE3 Rosetta cells (Invitrogen) coexpressing GST-Nwk and pET28a, pET28a-Snx16 (aa 220–407), or pET28a-Snx163A (aa 220–407) and bound to glutathione agarose in 25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 75 mM KCl (Fig. 1 E).

Cell culture

rab5, rab11, Snx16, and nwk cDNAs were tagged with mRFP, mCherry, and GFP under the control of the actin promoter or UAS sequences using Gateway technology (Invitrogen). Kc167 or S2 cells (Cherbas and Cherbas, 1998) were cultured according to standard protocols and transfected using Effectene reagent (QIAGEN). Transfected cells were incubated for 2–3 d at 20°C and then fixed for 15 min in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde. Cells were washed twice with PBS and imaged for mCherry or mRFP and GFP localization on a microscope (Axioplan; Carl Zeiss; see the following section). For Fig. 2 (B, C, and E), cells were spread for 1 h on coverslips coated with concanavalin A before fixation (Rogers et al., 2003). For wortmannin experiments, cells were transfected as in this paragraph, washed with PBS, and treated with 100 µM wortmannin or DMSO alone as a control for 45 min before fixation and imaging. For transferrin uptake assays, Kc167 cells transfected as in this paragraph with pUASt–human transferrin receptor (Strigini and Cohen, 2000), actin promoter–Gal4, and the indicated constructs were incubated at room temperature with culture media containing 5 µg/ml Alexa Fluor 546–labeled transferrin (Invitrogen). Cells were washed twice with PBS and then fixed and processed as in this paragraph.

IHC and analysis of NMJ morphology

For analysis of NMJ morphology and protein localization at the NMJ, flies were cultured at low density at 25°C. Wild-type controls for each experiment were selected to be closely genetically matched to experimental genotypes. For hrs and hrs;Snx16 mutants, which survived poorly, first and second instar larvae were transferred to grape juice plates and grown to third instar. Wild-type and Snx16 animals grew large and pupated much more quickly than hrs mutants under these conditions and, thus, were not included as controls. Wandering third instar larvae were dissected in calcium-free HL3.1 saline (Feng et al., 2004) and fixed for 30 min in HL3.1 containing 4% formaldehyde before antibody staining.

Larvae were mounted in 70% glycerol in PBS and imaged at room temperature on a microscope (Axioplan) equipped with a laser-scanning head (LSM510; Carl Zeiss) and oil immersion 40× 1.3 NA or 100× 1.3 NA objectives. Images were acquired with Pascal software. For analysis of NMJ morphology, NMJs on muscle 6/7, segment A3, and muscle 4, segments A2–A3, were selected for analysis. NMJs were stained with α-complexin (Cpx)– and Cy2-conjugated secondary antibodies (Huntwork and Littleton, 2007) and α-Discs Large– and Rhodamine Red-X–conjugated secondary antibodies (Parnas et al., 2001). Both type 1b and type 1s boutons were quantified on muscle 6/7. Only type 1b innervation, delineated by extensive postsynaptic anti–Discs Large staining, was quantified on muscle 4. Satellite boutons were defined as strings of five or fewer boutons extending from the main axis of the NMJ.

For dynasore experiments, dissected larvae were incubated for 10 min in HL3.1 with 90 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2 (Verstreken et al., 2008), and 100 µm dynasore (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.2% DMSO or 0.2% DMSO alone. High-potassium solution was used to ensure that all synaptic dynamin was cycled through a blockable state by stimulating complete synaptic vesicle release and reuptake (Ramaswami et al., 1994). Animals were briefly washed in HL3.1 and then fixed for 30 min in HL3.1 with 4% formaldehyde (note that fixation without detergent extraction preserves Nwk puncta) before imaging by laser-scanning confocal microscopy (which allows rigorous emission discrimination compared with spinning-disk confocal microscopy for colocalization analyses without cross talk between channels).

Live imaging

Wandering third instar larvae expressing Snx16-GFP and nwk-mRFP under the control of the panneuronal GAL4 driver elavC155 were dissected as in the previous section, mounted in HL3.1 under a coverslip, and imaged at room temperature with a 63× 1.4 NA objective on a microscope (Observer Z1; Carl Zeiss) equipped with a spinning-disk confocal head (CSU-X1; Yokagawa) and an electron microscope charge-coupled device camera (QuantEM 512SC; 3i People, Inc.). Confocal stacks of NMJs were collected at a frame rate of ~1 stack/2.5 s. Videos were created from maximum intensity projections of these stacks using SlideBook software (3i People, Inc.) and displayed at 10× live speed.

Electron microscopy

Wandering third instar larvae expressing Snx16-GFP or Snx163A-GFP were dissected, fixed, and processed for electron microscopy as previously described (Akbergenova and Bykhovskaia, 2009). In brief, filleted larvae were fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde, 4% formaldehyde, and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for 2 h at room temperature and then 4°C overnight. After washing in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate and 0.1 M sucrose, samples were postfixed for 1 h in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol and acetone, and embedded in epoxy resin (Embed 812; Electron Microscopy Sciences). Thin sections (70–90 nm) were collected on Formvar/carbon-coated copper slot grids and contrasted with lead citrate. For immunoelectron microscopy, samples were fixed for 20 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and blocked for 1 h in 1% BSA in PBS followed by incubation for 3 h in α-GFP (ab6556; Abcam) and then 2 h in a doubly conjugated Alexa Fluor 594 and 1.4-nm nanogold secondary antibody (Nanoprobes). The gold signal was enhanced for 7 min using Gold Enhance (Nanoprobes) followed by a second 1 h fixation in 1% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde and then embedded and sectioned as for unlabeled samples. Thin sections (70–90 nm for Fig. 8 C and 50–70 nm for Fig. 3 F) were imaged at a 49,000× magnification at 80 kV on an electron microscope (Tecnai G2 Spirit; FEI) equipped with an charge-coupled device camera (Advanced Microscopy Techniques). Type 1b boutons with small clear vesicles (Atwood et al., 1993; Jia et al., 1993) were scored for the presence of MVBs.


Evoked postsynaptic currents were recorded from muscle 6 of segment A3 in third instar larvae using two-electrode voltage clamp (OC-725; Warner Instruments) at a –80-mV holding potential (Acharya et al., 2006; Barber et al., 2009). All experiments were performed in a modified HL3.1 solution (70 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM NaHCO3, 115 mM sucrose, and 5 mM Hepes, pH 7.2). Animals were pretreated with 100 µm dynasore or DMSO control for 3–5 min before beginning stimulation and recording, and dynasore or DMSO were present throughout the recording. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using pClamp software (Axon Instruments). For stimulation, nerves were cut close to the ventral ganglion and sucked into a pipette filled with working solution. The nerve was stimulated at 20 Hz using a programmable pulse stimulator (Master-8; A.M.P.I.).

Image and statistical analyses

All image analysis was performed in ImageJ (National Institutes of Health), and quantitative colocalization was performed using the JACoP (Just Another Colocalization Plugin) plugin (Bolte and Cordelières, 2006). For quantification of Trio protein levels from 2D projections of confocal stacks, mean Trio and Cpx levels were measured within Cpx-positive NMJs on muscle 6/7, segments A2–A4. The muscle background mean intensity for both signals was also measured and subtracted from the NMJ measurement. Mean background-subtracted Trio intensity was then normalized to background-subtracted mean Cpx intensity. Mean Cpx intensity did not vary between genotypes. Phospho-Mad intensities were measured within α-Csp (cysteine-string protein; Zinsmaier et al., 1994)–positive NMJs. For quantification of Tkv localization, SNX16-GFP pixels were selected from single confocal sections of muscle 6/7, segments A2–A4, and the integrated density of Tkv in these structures was measured relative to the entire NMJ Tkv signal in the section. Snx163A data were separately normalized to the Snx16 mean for either TkvQ199D or endogenous Tkv because of their different expression levels above the background.

All errors shown are means ± SEM, and the number of samples averaged in each measurement in the bar graphs is indicated at the base of each bar. The statistical significance was calculated using Prism software (GraphPad Software) using analysis of variance followed by pair-wise Tukey’s tests or using Student’s t tests in which only two groups were compared, with an asterisks denoting p-value: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; and ***, P < 0.005.

Online supplemental material

Fig. S1 (associated with Fig. 1) shows alignment of SNX16 homologues. Fig. S2 (associated with Fig. 3) shows specificity of α-SNX16 antibodies. Fig. S3 (associated with Fig. 4) shows electrophysiological analysis of larval NMJs treated with dynasore. Videos 1–3 (associated with Fig. 4) show the transient association of Nwk-mRFP and SNX16-GFP in synaptic boutons. Online supplemental material is available at


We thank the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, the Exelixis Collection at Harvard Medical School, the Drosophila Genome Resource Center, The Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Kate O’Connor-Giles, Michael O’Connor, Marcos González-Gaitán, Hugo Bellen, and Michael Marr for reagents; Daniela Nicastro, Bruce Goode, and Piali Sengupta for equipment; Defne Yarar, Katharine Sepp, Joost Schulte, Bruce Goode, Robin Stevens, and Sarah Huntwork-Rodriguez for helpful scientific discussions; and Anne Yu, Danielle Pigneri, Betty Yang, Stephanie Shim, Rebecca Rodal, and Rebecca Motola-Barnes for technical assistance.

A.A. Rodal was supported by postdoctoral grants from the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation and the Charles King Trust of the Medical Foundation and a K99/R00 award from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K99NS060947). J.T. Littleton was supported by a National Institutes of Health award (NS43244).


Abbreviations used in this paper:

actin-related protein 2/3
bone morphogenic protein
excitatory postsynaptic current
endosomal sorting complex required for transport
monomeric RFP
multivesicular body
neuromuscular junction
Pearson’s correlation coefficient
Phox homology
Src homology 3
sorting nexin 16
upstream activating sequence
Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein


  • Acharya U., Edwards M.B., Jorquera R.A., Silva H., Nagashima K., Labarca P., Acharya J.K. 2006. Drosophila melanogaster Scramblases modulate synaptic transmission. J. Cell Biol. 173:69–82 10.1083/jcb.200506159 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Akbergenova Y., Bykhovskaia M. 2009. Enhancement of the endosomal endocytic pathway increases quantal size. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 40:199–206 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.10.005 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Atwood H.L., Govind C.K., Wu C.F. 1993. Differential ultrastructure of synaptic terminals on ventral longitudinal abdominal muscles in Drosophila larvae. J. Neurobiol. 24:1008–1024 10.1002/neu.480240803 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Awasaki T., Saito M., Sone M., Suzuki E., Sakai R., Ito K., Hama C. 2000. The Drosophila trio plays an essential role in patterning of axons by regulating their directional extension. Neuron. 26:119–131 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81143-5 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ball R.W., Warren-Paquin M., Tsurudome K., Liao E.H., Elazzouzi F., Cavanagh C., An B.S., Wang T.T., White J.H., Haghighi A.P. 2010. Retrograde BMP signaling controls synaptic growth at the NMJ by regulating trio expression in motor neurons. Neuron. 66:536–549 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.011 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Barber C.F., Jorquera R.A., Melom J.E., Littleton J.T. 2009. Postsynaptic regulation of synaptic plasticity by synaptotagmin 4 requires both C2 domains. J. Cell Biol. 187:295–310 10.1083/jcb.200903098 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bolte S., Cordelières F.P. 2006. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc. 224:213–232 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bonifacino J.S., Rojas R. 2006. Retrograde transport from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7:568–579 10.1038/nrm1985 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Brand A.H., Perrimon N. 1993. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 118:401–415 [PubMed]
  • Cherbas L., Cherbas P. 1998. Cell culture. In Drosophila: A Practical Approach Roberts D.B., editor. , editor IRL Press, Oxford, England, UK/New York: 319–346
  • Choi J.H., Hong W.P., Kim M.J., Kim J.H., Ryu S.H., Suh P.G. 2004. Sorting nexin 16 regulates EGF receptor trafficking by phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate interaction with the Phox domain. J. Cell Sci. 117:4209–4218 10.1242/jcs.01233 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cousin M.A. 2009. Activity-dependent bulk synaptic vesicle endocytosis—a fast, high capacity membrane retrieval mechanism. Mol. Neurobiol. 39:185–189 10.1007/s12035-009-8062-3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Coyle I.P., Koh Y.H., Lee W.C., Slind J., Fergestad T., Littleton J.T., Ganetzky B. 2004. Nervous wreck, an SH3 adaptor protein that interacts with Wsp, regulates synaptic growth in Drosophila. Neuron. 41:521–534 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00016-9 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cullen P.J. 2008. Endosomal sorting and signalling: an emerging role for sorting nexins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:574–582 10.1038/nrm2427 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Delgado R., Maureira C., Oliva C., Kidokoro Y., Labarca P. 2000. Size of vesicle pools, rates of mobilization, and recycling at neuromuscular synapses of a Drosophila mutant, shibire. Neuron. 28:941–953 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00165-3 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Dickman D.K., Lu Z., Meinertzhagen I.A., Schwarz T.L. 2006. Altered synaptic development and active zone spacing in endocytosis mutants. Curr. Biol. 16:591–598 10.1016/j.cub.2006.02.058 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Feng Y., Ueda A., Wu C.F. 2004. A modified minimal hemolymph-like solution, HL3.1, for physiological recordings at the neuromuscular junctions of normal and mutant Drosophila larvae. J. Neurogenet. 18:377–402 10.1080/01677060490894522 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Franco B., Bogdanik L., Bobinnec Y., Debec A., Bockaert J., Parmentier M.L., Grau Y. 2004. Shaggy, the homolog of glycogen synthase kinase 3, controls neuromuscular junction growth in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 24:6573–6577 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1580-04.2004 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Frangioni J.V., Neel B.G. 1993. Solubilization and purification of enzymatically active glutathione S-transferase (pGEX) fusion proteins. Anal. Biochem. 210:179–187 10.1006/abio.1993.1170 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Frost A., Unger V.M., De Camilli P. 2009. The BAR domain superfamily: membrane-molding macromolecules. Cell. 137:191–196 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.010 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Fuchs U., Rehkamp G., Haas O.A., Slany R., König M., Bojesen S., Bohle R.M., Damm-Welk C., Ludwig W.D., Harbott J., Borkhardt A. 2001. The human formin-binding protein 17 (FBP17) interacts with sorting nexin, SNX2, and is an MLL-fusion partner in acute myelogeneous leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:8756–8761 10.1073/pnas.121433898 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hanson B.J., Hong W. 2003. Evidence for a role of SNX16 in regulating traffic between the early and later endosomal compartments. J. Biol. Chem. 278:34617–34630 10.1074/jbc.M300143200 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hoodless P.A., Haerry T., Abdollah S., Stapleton M., O’Connor M.B., Attisano L., Wrana J.L. 1996. MADR1, a MAD-related protein that functions in BMP2 signaling pathways. Cell. 85:489–500 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81250-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Huntwork S., Littleton J.T. 2007. A complexin fusion clamp regulates spontaneous neurotransmitter release and synaptic growth. Nat. Neurosci. 10:1235–1237 10.1038/nn1980 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Jia X.X., Gorczyca M., Budnik V. 1993. Ultrastructure of neuromuscular junctions in Drosophila: comparison of wild type and mutants with increased excitability. J. Neurobiol. 24:1025–1044 10.1002/neu.480240804 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Khodosh R., Augsburger A., Schwarz T.L., Garrity P.A. 2006. Bchs, a BEACH domain protein, antagonizes Rab11 in synapse morphogenesis and other developmental events. Development. 133:4655–4665 10.1242/dev.02650 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Lloyd T.E., Atkinson R., Wu M.N., Zhou Y., Pennetta G., Bellen H.J. 2002. Hrs regulates endosome membrane invagination and tyrosine kinase receptor signaling in Drosophila. Cell. 108:261–269 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00611-6 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Macia E., Ehrlich M., Massol R., Boucrot E., Brunner C., Kirchhausen T. 2006. Dynasore, a cell-permeable inhibitor of dynamin. Dev. Cell. 10:839–850 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.002 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Marqués G., Zhang B. 2006. Retrograde signaling that regulates synaptic development and function at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 75:267–285 10.1016/S0074-7742(06)75012-7 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • McCabe B.D., Marqués G., Haghighi A.P., Fetter R.D., Crotty M.L., Haerry T.E., Goodman C.S., O’Connor M.B. 2003. The BMP homolog Gbb provides a retrograde signal that regulates synaptic growth at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Neuron. 39:241–254 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00426-4 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Mettlen M., Pucadyil T., Ramachandran R., Schmid S.L. 2009. Dissecting dynamin’s role in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 37:1022–1026 10.1042/BST0371022 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Miech C., Pauer H.U., He X., Schwarz T.L. 2008. Presynaptic local signaling by a canonical wingless pathway regulates development of the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J. Neurosci. 28:10875–10884 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0164-08.2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • O’Connor-Giles K.M., Ho L.L., Ganetzky B. 2008. Nervous wreck interacts with thickveins and the endocytic machinery to attenuate retrograde BMP signaling during synaptic growth. Neuron. 58:507–518 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.007 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Packard M., Koo E.S., Gorczyca M., Sharpe J., Cumberledge S., Budnik V. 2002. The Drosophila Wnt, wingless, provides an essential signal for pre- and postsynaptic differentiation. Cell. 111:319–330 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01047-4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Parnas D., Haghighi A.P., Fetter R.D., Kim S.W., Goodman C.S. 2001. Regulation of postsynaptic structure and protein localization by the Rho-type guanine nucleotide exchange factor dPix. Neuron. 32:415–424 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00485-8 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Persson U., Izumi H., Souchelnytskyi S., Itoh S., Grimsby S., Engström U., Heldin C.H., Funa K., ten Dijke P. 1998. The L45 loop in type I receptors for TGF-beta family members is a critical determinant in specifying Smad isoform activation. FEBS Lett. 434:83–87 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00954-5 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pylypenko O., Lundmark R., Rasmuson E., Carlsson S.R., Rak A. 2007. The PX-BAR membrane-remodeling unit of sorting nexin 9. EMBO J. 26:4788–4800 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601889 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Raiborg C., Stenmark H. 2009. The ESCRT machinery in endosomal sorting of ubiquitylated membrane proteins. Nature. 458:445–452 10.1038/nature07961 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ramaswami M., Krishnan K.S., Kelly R.B. 1994. Intermediates in synaptic vesicle recycling revealed by optical imaging of Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. Neuron. 13:363–375 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90353-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rao Y., Ma Q., Vahedi-Faridi A., Sundborger A., Pechstein A., Puchkov D., Luo L., Shupliakov O., Saenger W., Haucke V. 2010. Molecular basis for SH3 domain regulation of F-BAR-mediated membrane deformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:8213–8218 10.1073/pnas.1003478107 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rieckhof G.E., Yoshihara M., Guan Z., Littleton J.T. 2003. Presynaptic N-type calcium channels regulate synaptic growth. J. Biol. Chem. 278:41099–41108 10.1074/jbc.M306417200 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rodal A.A., Motola-Barnes R.N., Littleton J.T. 2008. Nervous wreck and Cdc42 cooperate to regulate endocytic actin assembly during synaptic growth. J. Neurosci. 28:8316–8325 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2304-08.2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rogers S.L., Wiedemann U., Stuurman N., Vale R.D. 2003. Molecular requirements for actin-based lamella formation in Drosophila S2 cells. J. Cell Biol. 162:1079–1088 10.1083/jcb.200303023 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Roos J., Kelly R.B. 1998. Dap160, a neural-specific Eps15 homology and multiple SH3 domain-containing protein that interacts with Drosophila dynamin. J. Biol. Chem. 273:19108–19119 10.1074/jbc.273.30.19108 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Roos J., Kelly R.B. 1999. The endocytic machinery in nerve terminals surrounds sites of exocytosis. Curr. Biol. 9:1411–1414 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80087-1 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sadowski L., Pilecka I., Miaczynska M. 2009. Signaling from endosomes: location makes a difference. Exp. Cell Res. 315:1601–1609 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.09.021 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sone M., Suzuki E., Hoshino M., Hou D., Kuromi H., Fukata M., Kuroda S., Kaibuchi K., Nabeshima Y., Hama C. 2000. Synaptic development is controlled in the periactive zones of Drosophila synapses. Development. 127:4157–4168 [PubMed]
  • Strigini M., Cohen S.M. 2000. Wingless gradient formation in the Drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 10:293–300 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00378-X [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Sweeney S.T., Davis G.W. 2002. Unrestricted synaptic growth in spinster-a late endosomal protein implicated in TGF-beta-mediated synaptic growth regulation. Neuron. 36:403–416 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01014-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Van Hoof D., Rodenburg K.W., Van der Horst D.J. 2005. Receptor-mediated endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of lipoproteins and transferrin in insect cells. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35:117–128 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.09.009 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Verstreken P., Ohyama T., Bellen H.J. 2008. FM 1-43 labeling of synaptic vesicle pools at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Methods Mol. Biol. 440:349–369 10.1007/978-1-59745-178-9_26 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang Q., Kaan H.Y., Hooda R.N., Goh S.L., Sondermann H. 2008a. Structure and plasticity of Endophilin and Sorting Nexin 9. Structure. 16:1574–1587 10.1016/j.str.2008.07.016 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang X., Shaw W.R., Tsang H.T., Reid E., O’Kane C.J. 2007. Drosophila spichthyin inhibits BMP signaling and regulates synaptic growth and axonal microtubules. Nat. Neurosci. 10:177–185 10.1038/nn1841 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wang Z., Edwards J.G., Riley N., Provance D.W.J., Jr, Karcher R., Li X.D., Davison I.G., Ikebe M., Mercer J.A., Kauer J.A., Ehlers M.D. 2008b. Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity. Cell. 135:535–548 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Wieser R., Wrana J.L., Massagué J. 1995. GS domain mutations that constitutively activate T beta R-I, the downstream signaling component in the TGF-beta receptor complex. EMBO J. 14:2199–2208 [PubMed]
  • Wucherpfennig T., Wilsch-Bräuninger M., González-Gaitán M. 2003. Role of Drosophila Rab5 during endosomal trafficking at the synapse and evoked neurotransmitter release. J. Cell Biol. 161:609–624 10.1083/jcb.200211087 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yarar D., Surka M.C., Leonard M.C., Schmid S.L. 2008. SNX9 activities are regulated by multiple phosphoinositides through both PX and BAR domains. Traffic. 9:133–146 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00675.x [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Yoshihara M., Adolfsen B., Galle K.T., Littleton J.T. 2005. Retrograde signaling by Syt 4 induces presynaptic release and synapse-specific growth. Science. 310:858–863 10.1126/science.1117541 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zinsmaier K.E., Eberle K.K., Buchner E., Walter N., Benzer S. 1994. Paralysis and early death in cysteine string protein mutants of Drosophila. Science. 263:977–980 10.1126/science.8310297 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press