Personality traits can be defined as individual qualities or characteristics that influence cognitions, emotions, and behaviors and lead to adaptive or maladaptive responses. Human personality is a multidimensional structure that is affected by both environmental and genetic factors. According to the literature, individual variation of the heritable component is estimated to account for 30-40% of the variance in personality traits [
1]. To date, the most frequently studied candidate gene for personality traits has been the functional polymorphism 5-HTTLPR in the promoter region of the SLC6A4 gene, which encodes the serotonin transporter. This polymorphism results in a short (S) and a long (L) variant [
2,
3].
Functional studies of the activity of the SLC6A4 promoter in transfected cell lines, postmortem human brains, and lymphoblasts have confirmed that the L allele is associated with higher levels of transcriptional activity and influences the rate of serotonin uptake more than the S variant [
4]. According to recent findings, the S allele is associated with a less favorable response/resistance to pharmacological treatment [
5-
8] but also with central stress regulation [
9-
11].
Recently it has been critically discussed that the analysis of 5-HTTLPR is incomplete, because other polymorphisms have been found in the proximity of the Ins/Del locus, such as rs25531, rs25532, rs2020933, and a 17-bp variable tandem repeat in the second intron (STin2) [
4,
12,
13]. In particular, rs25531, the polymorphism nearest 5-HTTLPR, results in an A to G substitution and has been shown to modulate the effect of 5-HTTLPR on transcriptional efficacy. Our recent work [
8] reported evidence that the rs25531 polymorphism is located immediately outside of the 5-HTTLPR segment, resulting in the status of 5-HTTLPR and rs25531 as two independent polymorphisms. It has been reported that the G allele of rs25531 is in phase with the 5-HTTLPR long allele and mitigates transcriptional efficacy more than does the 5-HTTLPR short allele. Therefore, the modulation of 5-HTTLPR by rs25531 results in haplotypes with a high (L
A) or low (L
G, S
A or S
G) transcriptional efficacy [
4,
14].
The inventories mostly used in biological studies of personality are the NEO-Personality Inventory [
15] and the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) [
16]. Although NEO and TCI have relevant differences, they appear similar when evaluating anxiety traits such as Neuroticism (N) and Harm Avoidance (HA). Several studies have shown that N is highly related to HA [
17,
18], but there is evidence that N and HA may not be equivalent [
19].
Since the first paper of Lesch [
3] was published, a large number of studies have sought evidence of an association between the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and anxiety-related personality traits. Despite these investigations, the strength and nature of any association is still uncertain. Controvertible results were obtained using both the TCI and NEO scales. In addition, five meta-analyses [
20-
24] provided conflicting results. In 2003, Munafò [
20] reported an association between the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and avoidance traits, but this effect was no longer being significant when data from studies reporting allele frequencies not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and unpublished data were excluded. Two successive meta-analyses [
23,
24] found an association between N and 5-HTTLPR, although no link with HA was observed. However, opposing data were reported in a different meta-analysis in 2005 [
21]. Munafò et al. [
21] concluded that the effect, if present, is small. More recently, the same authors [
22] presented a more complete meta-analysis, which evidenced no association of 5-HTTLPR with HA and a significant association with N; however, the association was lost due to high between-study heterogeneity in analyses conducted using the random effects model.
It is important to emphasize that these contrasting results may be explained by the inclusion of studies that recruited participants from psychiatric populations. Both Schinka and Sen's meta-analyses [
23,
24] included data from healthy and patients whereas the different Munafò's meta-analyses [
20-
22] explicitly excluded studies that recruited from psychiatric populations and, when both psychiatric and control samples were recruited, data from healthy controls only were included. Indeed, the personality traits of pathological people could be confounding factors. It has long been known that depression and anxiety disorders are associated with higher scores for anxiety-related traits [
25-
28]. In addition, a higher frequency of the S allele was observed in depressed and anxious disorders patients [
29]. Another relevant bias could be the inclusion of data from presumably healthy subjects without any psychological screening to exclude any DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorders.
On the basis of these conflicting evidences we performed the following analyses: 1) STUDY I: an association study between the 5-HTTLPR and rs25531 and the relative estimated/phased haplotypes with anxiety personality traits measured using the self-rated TCI scale. The analyses were carried out in the whole sample of controls as well as in subjects without any DSM-IV axis I disorders screened by structured interviews; 2) STUDY II: meta-analyses of 5-HTTLPR and HA or N in controls and in screened samples.
STUDY 1: A new association study of 5-HTTLPR and 5-HTTLPR/rs25531 with HA