PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmcpsycBioMed Centralsearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleBMC Psychiatry
 
BMC Psychiatry. 2011; 11: 49.
Published online 2011 March 29. doi:  10.1186/1471-244X-11-49
PMCID: PMC3074532
Sociodemographic and occupational risk factors associated with the development of different burnout types: the cross-sectional University of Zaragoza study
Jesús Montero-Marín,1,2,7 Javier García-Campayo,corresponding author1,7,8 Marta Fajó-Pascual,2 José Miguel Carrasco,3 Santiago Gascón,4,7 Margarita Gili,5,7 and Fermín Mayoral-Cleries6,7
1Department of Psychiatry. University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
2Faculty of Health and Sports. University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
3Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (Aragon Health Sciences Institute), Zaragoza, Spain
4Department of Psychology and Sociology. University of Zaragoza, Teruel, Spain
5Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut (IUNICS). University of Balearic Islands, Spain
6Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Hay, Malaga, Spain
7REDIAPP "Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud" RD06/0018/0017, Research Network on Preventative Activities and Health Promotion
8Psychiatry Service. Miguel Servet Hospital. Zaragoza, Spain
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Jesús Montero-Marín: jmontero/at/unizar.es; Javier García-Campayo: jgarcamp/at/arrakis.es; Marta Fajó-Pascual: mfajo/at/unizar.es; José Miguel Carrasco: jmcarrasco.iacs/at/aragon.es; Santiago Gascón: sgascon/at/unizar.es; Margarita Gili: mgili/at/uib.es; Fermín Mayoral-Cleries: fermin.mayoral.sspa/at/juntadeandalucia.es
Received July 4, 2010; Accepted March 29, 2011.
Abstract
Background
Three different burnout types have been described: The "frenetic" type describes involved and ambitious subjects who sacrifice their health and personal lives for their jobs; the "underchallenged" type describes indifferent and bored workers who fail to find personal development in their jobs and the "worn-out" in type describes neglectful subjects who feel they have little control over results and whose efforts go unacknowledged. The study aimed to describe the possible associations between burnout types and general sociodemographic and occupational characteristics.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was carried out on a multi-occupational sample of randomly selected university employees (n = 409). The presence of burnout types was assessed by means of the "Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire (BCSQ-36)", and the degree of association between variables was assessed using an adjusted odds ratio (OR) obtained from multivariate logistic regression models.
Results
Individuals working more than 40 hours per week presented with the greatest risk for "frenetic" burnout compared to those working fewer than 35 hours (adjusted OR = 5.69; 95% CI = 2.52-12.82; p < 0.001). Administration and service personnel presented the greatest risk of "underchallenged" burnout compared to teaching and research staff (adjusted OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 1.16-7.01; p = 0.023). Employees with more than sixteen years of service in the organisation presented the greatest risk of "worn-out" burnout compared to those with less than four years of service (adjusted OR = 4.56; 95% CI = 1.47-14.16; p = 0.009).
Conclusions
This study is the first to our knowledge that suggests the existence of associations between the different burnout subtypes (classified according to the degree of dedication to work) and the different sociodemographic and occupational characteristics that are congruent with the definition of each of the subtypes. These results are consistent with the clinical profile definitions of burnout syndrome. In addition, they assist the recognition of distinct profiles and reinforce the idea of differential characterisation of the syndrome for more effective treatment.
Keywords: burnout, subtypes, risk factors, BCSQ-36, university
Articles from BMC Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central