|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
In cells the de novo nucleation of actin filaments from monomers requires actin-nucleating proteins. These fall into three main families – the Arp2/ 3 complex and its nucleation promoting factors (NPFs), formins, and tandem-monomer-binding nucleators. In this review, we highlight recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanism of actin nucleation by both well-characterized and newly-identified nucleators, and explore current insights into their cellular functions in membrane trafficking, cell migration and division. The mechanisms and functions of actin nucleators are proving to be more complex than previously considered, with extensive cooperation and overlap in their cellular roles.
Actin is one of the most highly conserved and abundant proteins in eukaryotic cells and is a major constituent of the cytoskeleton. Actin monomers (G-actin) assemble to form polarized filaments (F-actin) that have a fast-growing barbed end and a slower-growing pointed end. The first step in the assembly of actin filaments is nucleation, which is defined as the formation of a stable multimer of actin monomers. This is the rate-limiting step in polymerization due to the instability of actin dimer intermediates and the activity of actin monomer-sequestering proteins that suppress spontaneous nucleation in cells. To overcome the kinetic hurdle for nucleation, cells use a diverse set of actin-nucleating proteins, including the actin-related protein 2/ 3 (Arp2/ 3) complex, formins and tandem-monomer-binding nucleators. These proteins play important roles in many essential cellular processes.
In this review, we first compare the biochemical mechanisms of actin nucleation, focusing on recent advances and newly-discovered nucleators. We next describe progress in our understanding of the function of these nucleators in key actin-dependent processes including membrane trafficking, cell migration and division, examining how the characterization of known nucleators and the identification of new nucleators has revealed new ways in which actin polymerization contributes to cell function.
The first major actin nucleator to be discovered was the Arp2/ 3 complex, which is composed of evolutionarily-conserved subunits including the actin-related proteins Arp2 and Arp3 and five additional subunits ARPC1–5 (reviewed in ). The Arp2/ 3 complex by itself is an inefficient nucleator, and its activation requires binding to the sides of actin filaments and to proteins called nucleation promoting factors (NPFs) that have WCA domains consisting of G-actin binding WH2 (W) domains and Arp2/ 3-binding central/ acidic (CA) sequences. Once activated, the Arp2/ 3 complex nucleates the formation of new filaments that extend from the sides of existing filaments at a 70° angle to form a Y-branched network (Figure 1, left panel).
Although the ability of the Arp2/ 3 complex to nucleate Y-branched arrays is well-characterized, the mechanism of nucleation and branching is not fully understood. The most recent model of the Y-branch was obtained by docking the atomic-resolution crystal structure of an inactive conformation of the Arp2/ 3 complex into a 3D reconstruction of the branch obtained by electron tomography . This study suggested that Arp2 and Arp3 interact with the pointed end of the daughter filament while the remaining subunits, in particular ARPC2 and ARPC4, make substantial contacts with the mother filament. However, the functional importance of specific subunits and surfaces of the complex has only begun to be thoroughly investigated. Recent studies employing mutagenesis of conserved surface residues on ARPC1, ARPC2 and ARPC4 have defined features that are functionally important for activity. In particular, residues on a conserved surface on ARPC2 and ARPC4 that is predicted to lie close to the mother filament in the Y-branch  were shown to be required for efficient actin nucleation, as well as for high affinity actin filament binding and Y-branch stability [3,4]. Moreover, a conserved surface on ARPC1 was shown to be important for nucleation and binding to the WCA domain of the NPF Las17 (the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ortholog of the mammalian NPF WASP) . Further mutational analyses combined with structural studies are needed to elucidate the detailed mechanism by which the Arp2/ 3 complex nucleates and branches filaments.
Because actin nucleation by the Arp2/ 3 complex requires the activity of NPFs, understanding NPF function and regulation is central to determining the mechanism of actin nucleation. Mammalian cells express several NPFs, including the well-characterized Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome protein (WASP), neuronal WASP (N-WASP), three WASP and verprolin homologs (WAVEs), and the more recently identified WASP homolog associated with actin, membranes and microtubules (WHAMM), WASP and Scar homolog (WASH), and junction mediating regulatory (JMY) protein. The canonical mode of regulation of NPFs is via allosteric modulation of the accessibility of the WCA domain, either by autoinhibition through intramolecular interactions between the WCA and upstream domains of the NPF, as is the case for WASP and N-WASP (reviewed in ), or trans-regulation by interacting proteins, as was shown for the WAVEs [7,8]. Recent studies have also identified oligomerization as another layer of NPF regulation, based on the findings that dimerization of the WCA region increases the affinity of NPFs for the Arp2/ 3 complex and the efficiency of actin nucleation. Thus, oligomerization can act together with allostery to enable NPFs to integrate a wide variety of cellular inputs that lead to activation of the Arp2/ 3 complex.
In addition to exploring the mechanisms of Arp2/ 3 complex activation, recent work has begun to elucidate the mechanisms of Arp2/ 3 complex inactivation and recycling through a process termed debranching. It has been known for some time that ATP hydrolysis by actin and the Arp2 subunit of the Arp2/ 3 complex , as well as binding of coronin , promote debranching and recycling of the Arp2/ 3 complex. More recent studies identified two new molecular players important for debranching: actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/ cofilin and the ADF/ cofilin superfamily protein glia maturation factor (GMF). These factors stimulate debranching through two distinct mechanisms (Figure 1, left panel). ADF/ cofilin, a filament severing protein, is proposed to stimulate debranching by directly competing with Arp2/ 3 for binding to F-actin as well as by causing a structural change in actin that reduces the affinity for Arp2/ 3 . These experiments were performed with ADF/ cofilin purified from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and it has not yet been reported whether one or more of the three ADF/ cofilin family proteins expressed in mammalian cells (ADF, cofilin-1, and cofilin-2), which have some differences in their biochemical activities , might also regulate debranching. In contrast to ADF/ cofilin, GMF binds to the Arp2/ 3 complex but not to F-actin, and it prunes daughter filaments at branch points and inhibits Arp2/ 3-mediated nucleation of new filaments [13,14]. In the future, it will be important to address how the activities of Arp2/ 3-activating and Arp2/3-debranching proteins are coordinated to control Y-branch dynamics in cells.
The second major class of actin nucleators to be identified was the formins (reviewed in ). In contrast to the Arp2/ 3 complex, they are multidomain proteins that function as dimers to assemble unbranched actin filaments. Formins both nucleate actin and act as elongation factors that processively associate with growing barbed ends (Figure 1, right panel), a phenomenon that has now been directly observed by tracking quantum dots coated with formins riding filament ends . Processive association of formins with growing ends allows the addition of actin subunits while preventing capping proteins from terminating polymerization. The defining structural feature of formins is their conserved formin homology (FH) FH1 and FH2 domains. The homodimeric FH2 domain is thought to catalyze actin filament nucleation by stabilizing actin dimers (Figure 1, right panel), although the FH2 domains of different formins vary widely in their nucleation activity. Elongation is then stimulated by the proline-rich FH1 domain, which binds to and increases the local concentration of profilin-bound G-actin to enable its delivery to the barbed end.
Recent work aimed at understanding the mechanism of action of formins has focused on the processive association with elongating filaments, and in particular the source of energy for this process. Nevertheless, the mechanism remains controversial. One study proposed that the energy for processive movement is derived from ATP hydrolysis on actin that is coupled to addition of profilin-actin onto barbed ends . However, a more recent study concluded that ATP hydrolysis on actin is not required for processivity, and instead postulated that the energy is derived from the binding of actin subunits to the barbed end . Further investigation is required to resolve this controversy, and future efforts will focus on not only energetics but also on the structural basis for both nucleation and elongation, as well as potential mechanistic diversity within the formin family.
Apart from the mechanism of formin-mediated nucleation and elongation, recent studies have also characterized various modes of formin regulation. Formin activities can be regulated at multiple points, including initial activation, actin nucleation and elongation, and inactivation and recycling. The best understood mechanism of regulation is allosteric autoinhibition through intramolecular interactions between the Dia autoregulatory domain (DAD) and Dia inhibitory domain (DID) , similar to that discussed above for the NPFs WASP and N-WASP. Trans-regulation of formins by interacting proteins has since emerged as another mode of regulation. Previous studies had identified two proteins that inhibit formin activity in vitro, Dia-interacting protein/ WASP interacting SH3 protein (DIP/ WISH)  and Spire , although Spire is also thought to cooperate with formins to assemble actin filaments in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes . More recently, S. cerevisiae Bud14p was identified as an inhibitor of the formin Bnr1p. Bud14p was shown to displace Bnr1p from growing barbed ends, and to restrict the length of actin filaments elongated by formins in vitro and in cells . A second mechanism to attenuate formin-mediated elongation involves the actin-binding protein tropomyosin, which promotes annealing of actin filaments in a manner that can trap formins within the filament and promotes displacement of formins from barbed ends . These studies suggest that formin displacement may be a critical point of regulation, and future studies will need to address how allosteric activation and formin displacement are coordinated in the formin regulatory cycle.
The third group of actin nucleators includes Spire, cordon-bleu (Cobl), leiomodin (Lmod) (reviewed in ) and the recently described JMY  and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) . These contain tandem G-actin-binding motifs, which bring together monomers to form a polymerization nucleus. In addition to nucleating actin assembly, Spire has also been reported to sever actin filaments and modulate barbed end polymerization . While the WH2 domain is the most common actin-binding motif in these nucleators, they also have additional actin-binding elements. These include the monomer-binding linker (MBL) in Spire and JMY, tropomyosin and actin-binding helices (Tmh/ Ah) and the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) in leiomodin, and the actin-nucleating sequences (ANS1, 2) in APC. This heterogeneity implies that nucleators with distinct domain architecture may remain to be identified.
Despite their shared ability to nucleate actin by gathering monomers into a nucleation complex, members of this family have been proposed to form nuclei with distinct structural arrangements (Figure 1, middle panel). For example, Spire and JMY  have been proposed to stabilize monomers aligned along the long-pitch helix of the filament, whereas Cobl, Lmod  and APC  have been proposed to stabilize cross-filament interactions along the short-pitch helix. However, little structural information is available to verify these proposed mechanisms. An initial X-ray scattering analysis of a Spire-like hybrid WH2 cluster suggested that the nucleus consisted of actin subunits aligned along the long-pitch helix of the filament . However, a more recent determination of the structure of a Spire-actin nucleus by X-ray crystallography suggested that actin monomers are initially organized in a compacted conformation that isomerizes to form a straight long-pitch configuration upon addition of monomers in cross-filament interactions . The configuration of the APC-actin nucleus may be distinct, as APC differs from other members of this class in that its minimum nucleating domain has been shown to form a dimer in vitro . Further structural and biochemical studies are needed to define the configuration of the actin nucleus and the mechanism of actin assembly by members of this class of nucleators.
Emerging evidence suggests that these nucleator families do not necessarily function individually, and that cross-talk occurs between different nucleators in cells. For example, Spire directly interacts with the formin Cappuccino (Capu) in vitro, and this interaction blocks Capu actin nucleation activity while enhancing Spire activity . Spire and Capu also function together to organize a dynamic network of actin filaments in Drosophila oocytes . APC synergizes with the formin mammalian homolog of Diaphanous 1 (mDia1) to promote actin nucleation in vitro and ectopic actin assembly in cells . JMY both nucleates actin itself and cooperates with the Arp2/ 3 complex to nucleate actin in vitro, although how these activities are coordinated in cells is not known . Finally, the NPF WASH was shown to function together with Spire and the formin Capu to regulate actin and microtubule organization during Drosophila oogenesis . These findings suggest that an intricate interplay between different actin nucleators may enable increased spatial and temporal control over actin assembly in cells and allow greater flexibility in the overall architecture of actin filament networks.
The different classes of actin nucleators discussed above play important roles in a variety of cellular processes. Here, we focus on recent advances and controversies related to the function of actin nucleators in three key actin-dependent processes: membrane trafficking, leading edge protrusion during cell migration, and cell division.
Actin polymerization plays a role in many membrane trafficking events including endocytic internalization, endocytic transport, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-Golgi transport. One function of actin nucleation common to each of these processes is the dynamic shaping and remodeling of membranes. The actin nucleators that contribute to these processes span all three classes and include the Arp2/ 3 complex and its NPFs, the inverted formin 2 (INF2), and the tandem -monomer-binding nucleator Spire.
The functional importance of actin polymerization in the internalization step of clathrin-mediated endocytosis is well established and many of the molecular players have been identified, particularly in the yeast S. cerevisiae, where the process is intensively studied (reviewed in ). The Arp2/ 3 complex is the primary actin nucleator during this process, and it is activated by a number of different NPFs including Las17p/ WASp, Abp1p, Pan1p, Myo3p and Myo5p in S. cerevisiae, and N-WASP in mammalian cells. Despite the fact that many key molecules have been identified, the biochemical and biophysical contributions of actin polymerization are matters of active investigation. Our relatively detailed understanding of both the molecules and subprocesses involved in endocytic internalization has enabled the recent development of a theoretical model that describes how membrane shaping is coupled with the underlying biochemical reactions . According to this model, actin nucleation and polymerization are important for the generation of an initial force that drives the shaping of membrane invaginations, resulting in the initiation of a positive feedback loop involving the recruitment of Bin/ Amphiphysin/ Rvs (BAR) domain proteins and lipid phosphatases, and the development of PI(4,5)P2 lipidphase segregation. This phase separation is thought to generate an interfacial force that constricts the membrane invagination and drives vesicle scission. Interestingly, actin polymerization by the Arp2/ 3 complex and activated N-WASP in the absence of other factors was recently shown to drive vesicle scission from tubulated membrane intermediates in a reconstituted system in vitro . These studies support the emerging view that actin nucleation and polymerization induce membrane deformation and scission via a capacity to generate force and/ or promote lipid phase segregation.
In contrast to the case of endocytic internalization, the role of actin in later stages of endocytic trafficking is poorly understood and the molecular players are just now being identified (Figure 2a). A handful of nucleating proteins that function in early-to-late endosome transport have been identified, including the NPF WASH as well as Spire1 and annexin A2. WASH localizes to patches on early and recycling endosomes, where it promotes Arp2/ 3 complex-induced actin nucleation [33–35]. WASH has been implicated in modulating endosome shape and is hypothesized to function in receptor recycling, retromer-mediated endosome-to-Golgi transport, and endosome-to-lysosome trafficking. Although native WASH was recently shown to exist in a multiprotein complex, how the activity of the complex is regulated has not yet been determined [33,35,36]. In addition to WASH and the Arp2/ 3 complex, Spire1 has also been localized to early endosomes and shown to bind to and function with annexin A2 in nucleating F-actin patches . Although these studies highlight the functional importance of actin nucleation in shaping the membranes of early endosomes and in enabling endosomal trafficking, the precise mechanistic contribution of actin remains unknown. Because actin-mediated membrane reorganization facilitates vesicle scission during internalization, it is tempting to speculate that actin polymerization might perform a similar function during later stages of endocytic trafficking.
In addition to playing a role in endocytosis, actin nucleation has also been implicated in ER-to-Golgi transport (Figure 2a). The NPF WHAMM localizes to the cis-Golgi apparatus, and functions in maintaining Golgi shape and facilitating ER-to-Golgi transport . In addition, WHAMM localizes to tubulo-vesicular membrane transport intermediates and promotes membrane tubulation and tubule elongation by inducing Arp2/ 3-mediated actin assembly and interacting with microtubules. Although WHAMM-mediated Arp2/ 3 activation remains the best-characterized way of nucleating actin during ER-to-Golgi transport, another nucleator was also recently implicated in this process. The formin INF2 was localized to the ER and was implicated in actin assembly in cells based on the observation that an activated mutant caused actin assembly and ER collapse onto the nucleus . Interestingly, INF2 was also implicated in basolateral-to-apical transcytosis in polarized hepatoma cells . Future studies will address the role of actin nucleation in membrane trafficking by exploring more precisely the stages of transport that require actin, whether the role of actin is general or restricted to certain cargos, and what biophysical role actin nucleation plays in reshaping and remodeling membranes.
In migrating cells, actin polymerization in flat membrane protrusions called lamellipodia and finger-like protrusions called filopodia provides the driving force for leading edge protrusion (reviewed in ). Widely-accepted models have proposed that lamellipodia are composed of Y-branched filament networks nucleated by Arp2/ 3 complex while filopodia are composed of linear bundles nucleated by formins. However, recent work has challenged some of these assumptions. These studies suggest that the molecular mechanisms of actin nucleation in lamellipodia and filopodia are likely to be complicated and involve cross-participation of diverse actin nucleators.
The dendritic nucleation model, which posits that the Arp2/ 3 complex and NPFs polymerize Y-branched filament networks, has long been the accepted model for actin nucleation in lamellipodia (Figure 2b) . Evidence supporting this model comes from the observations that Y-branching is integral to Arp2/ 3 complex activity in vitro, that Arp2/ 3 is required for lamellipodium formation in cells, and that Y-branches were observed in lamellipodia by electron microscopy with Arp2/ 3 localized to branch points [1,41]. However, this model has been challenged by a recent study in which actin filament networks in lamellipodia of live vitreously frozen cells were visualized by electron tomography . Using this method, individual filaments could be traced along the lamellipodium and were observed to be long and organized into doublets of X-links, but few Y-branches were seen (Figure 2b). This finding opens a new debate about the dendritic nucleation model, and suggests an alternative model that does not rule out the importance of Arp2/ 3 complex for actin nucleation, but implies that Arp2/ 3 may not always form Y-branches in cells. Given the strength of the evidence supporting the dendritic nucleation model, discarding this model is premature, and additional confirmatory work is needed to buttress the case that Y-branches are indeed absent from actin networks within lamellipodia and other structures known to be assembled by the Arp2/ 3 complex.
Activation of the Arp2/ 3 complex in lamellipodia is known to be mediated by the WAVE subfamily of NPFs . More recently, the multifunctional actin nucleator JMY was also shown to localize to lamellipodia in migrating cells, and its depletion slowed migration while its overexpression enhanced migration . JMY was originally discovered as a transcriptional coactivator, and its function in cell migration was recently postulated to be due in part to a role in controlling cadherin expression and cell adhesion . Moreover, the nucleating and Arp2/ 3-activating activities of JMY both appear to be important for its function in enhancing cell migration [24,43]. The dual ability of JMY to directly nucleate unbranched actin filaments and activate the Arp2/ 3 complex to polymerize branched actin filaments might help explain the presence of both filament populations in lamellipodia. The presence of a substantial population of unbranched filaments in lamellipodia also suggests the possible involvement of formins. However, evidence addressing a possible role for formins is only beginning to emerge. A melanoma-derived cell line was shown to require mDia2 for lamellipodium formation , although mDia2 was not required for membrane ruffling in HeLa cells . T cells  and neutrophils  from mDia1 knockout mice exhibited impaired polarization and chemotaxis, further supporting the functional importance of formins during cell migration. Future experimental studies are required to determine how different actin nucleators work together to polymerize actin in lamellipodia and similar protrusive structures.
In filopodia, which contain bundled arrays of actin filaments, the precise role of actin nucleators is also a matter of active investigation and debate, and two competing models have been proposed. According to the tip nucleation model, filopodia arise by formin-mediated nucleation and elongation of linear filaments at the extending filopodial tip (Figure 2b) (reviewed in ). In support of this model, depletion of mDia2 in cells inhibits filopodium formation while overexpression of a constitutively active mutant induces it [44,49,50]. Although a role for mDia2 is clear, whether it functions primarily to nucleate or to elongate existing filaments remains uncertain. The alternative model, termed convergent elongation, proposes that the bundle of filaments in filopodia originates from a branched network of filaments nucleated by Arp2/ 3 complex in lamellipodia (Figure 2b). Initial support for this model came from electron micrographs showing that filaments in filopodia are continuous with those in lamellipodia , and from the observation that inhibition of Arp2/ 3 complex activity suppressed filopodium formation in neurons . However, others have found that silencing of the Arp2/ 3 complex in melanoma cells does not abolish filopodium formation, suggesting that the requirement for the Arp2/ 3 complex may be cell-type dependent . To further complicate matters, it was recently shown that the Arp2/ 3 complex localizes to puncta within filopodia of spreading cells that may correspond to lamellipodia activity within filopodia , and to the heads of neuronal dendritic spines at the tips of dendritic filopodia [50,55]. Continued examination of the relationship between filopodia and lamellipodia, both at an ultrastructural and mechanistic level, is required to determine in what contexts actin nucleation in both structures is interdependent or separable.
Actin nucleation also plays crucial and varied roles at several stages of cell division. The best-studied of these is the assembly of the contractile ring, which is essential for cytokinesis. Recent work has highlighted unexpected roles for actin in other facets of cell division, including centrosome separation and asymmetric positioning of the spindle and chromosomes in oocytes, as well as segregation of protein aggregates in yeast.
The molecular requirements for contractile ring assembly have been best characterized in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The key actin nucleator in this system is the formin Cdc12p, which is essential for actin assembly in the contractile ring (reviewed in ). How actin nucleation and elongation by Cdc12p contributes to contractile ring assembly is under active investigation. Cdc12p expressed by its native promoter localizes to a broad band of multiple nodes at the division site . Actin filaments are nucleated from these nodes and elongate in random directions (Figure 2c). Following actin filament nucleation, myosin-II activity is required for the nodes to coalesce into the contractile ring. Mathematical simulations of this process support a search, capture, pull and release model in which actin filaments nucleated by Cdc12p are transiently captured by myosin-II in neighboring nodes, which then pull nodes together . Interestingly, ectopic expression of an activated mutant of Cdc12p results in contractile ring assembly in interphase, a process that requires not only actin assembly but also activation of other contractile ring factors, suggesting that Cdc12p may function as a regulator that drives ring assembly via multiple pathways . Studies in animal cells also provide evidence for the functional importance of formins during contractile ring assembly . Most recently, the mammalian formin mDia2 was shown to localize to the cleavage furrow and perform important functions in actin assembly and cytokinesis [60,61]. It remains to be seen whether formins in mammalian cells participate in contractile ring assembly via a mechanism similar to that seen in S. pombe, or by another pathway.
In addition to having a role in contractile ring assembly, actin nucleation is important for other facets of cell division, including centrosome separation, spindle and chromosome movements, and segregation of damaged proteins (Figure 2c). During cell divisions in the early syncytial Drosophila melanogaster embryo, centrosome separation is driven in part by microtubules and the motor dynein. However, this process was also recently shown to require actin nucleation by the Arp2/ 3 complex and the formin Diaphanous (Dia) . Centrosome separation in mammalian cells also depends in part on cortical actin and myosin , although a function for actin nucleators has not been investigated. Apart from its roles early in cell division, actin nucleation is also important later, particularly in mammalian oocytes during female asymmetric meiotic divisions. Asymmetric divisions involve off-center positioning of the spindle and chromosomes, a process that in mouse oocytes depends on a dynamic actin network but not on microtubules. Actin nucleation by formin 2 (FMN2) was shown to play a key role in spindle and chromosome movement during this process [64–66]. Whether the force for movement is derived from actin polymerization  or myosin activity  is a matter of debate, although both force-generating mechanisms could operate at different stages of the process. A third facet of cell division that requires actin nucleation is the establishment of cellular age asymmetry in S. cerevisiae. In dividing yeast cells subjected to heat stress, aggregated proteins are segregated from daughter cells to mother cells, a process that is proposed to be related to aging of the mother cell . The formin Bni1p generates actin cables extending from the polarisome at the distal end of the daughter cell that are required for directional transport of protein aggregates to the mother cell. It is unclear whether actin polymerization itself drives transport or whether myosin motors also participate. Another formin, Bnr1p, also contributes to asymmetry by allowing protein aggregates in mother cells to merge into an inclusion body. It is an open question as to whether there is a similar protein quality control mechanism during division in other species. The involvement of actin nucleators in such a diverse array of processes is remarkable, and suggests that we are just scratching the surface in terms of our mechanistic understanding of the roles that these proteins play in cell division.
The past two years have seen key advances both in understanding the function of previously-recognized actin nucleators, and in identifying new ones. These advances have come from a combination of biochemical and structural studies aimed at deciphering the mechanisms of actin nucleation, and cell biological studies aimed at defining the functions of actin nucleators at a cellular and organismal level. However, many unanswered questions remain. For example, we know little about the structures of actin nucleators in their activated states, and advances in this area will be essential for understanding the mechanisms of nucleation in greater detail. Moreover, how upstream signal transduction pathways regulate the activity of nucleators needs to be determined at a biochemical level, especially for those that were only recently discovered. More detailed cell biological experiments are also required to explain the function and regulation of actin nucleation during distinct cellular processes. Lastly, emerging evidence has suggested that actin nucleators cooperate with and antagonize each other in vivo, overturning simplified models that assigned one nucleator to one cellular process. Systems-level approaches will be required to determine how the complex cast of molecular players and their interactions are integrated during cell function and behavior. Thus, future studies will allow us to better appreciate the complexity of cellular actin nucleation pathways.
We thank Erin Benanti, Ken Campellone, Steve Duleh, Cat Haglund and Taro Ohkawa for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the NIH/ NIGMS (GM059609) and the University of California Cancer Research Coordinating Committee to M.D.W, and a predoctoral fellowship from the American Heart Association (0715035Y) to E.N.F.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.