PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of sigsLink to Publisher's site
 
Stand Genomic Sci. 2011 March 4; 4(1): 36–44.
Published online 2011 February 20. doi:  10.4056/sigs.1503846
PMCID: PMC3072083

Complete genome sequence of Paludibacter propionicigenes type strain (WB4T)

Abstract

Paludibacter propionicigenes Ueki et al. 2006 is the type species of the genus Paludibacter, which belongs to the family Porphyromonadaceae. The species is of interest because of the position it occupies in the tree of life where it can be found in close proximity to members of the genus Dysgonomonas. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Paludibacter and the third sequence from the family Porphyromonadaceae. The 3,685,504 bp long genome with its 3,054 protein-coding and 64 RNA genes consists of one circular chromosome and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords: strictly anaerobic, nonmotile, Gram-negative, anoxic rice-field soil, mesophilic, chemoorganotrophic, Porphyromonadaceae, GEBA

Introduction

Strain WB4T (= DSM 17365 = CCUG 53888 = JCM 13257) is the type strain of P. propionicigenes, which is the type species of the genus Paludibacter [1,2]. Currently, there is only one species placed in the genus Paludibacter [1]. The generic name derives from the Latin noun palusudis meaning swamp or marsh and the Neo-Latin word bacter meaning a rod, referring to a rod living in swamps [2]. The species epithet is derived from the Neo-Latin word acidum propionicum meaning propionic acid and the Greek verb gennao meaning to produce, referring to the metabolic property of the species [2]. P. propionicigenes strain WB4T was isolated together with a number of other strains from rice plant residues in an anoxic rice-field soil in Yamagata, Japan, and described for the first time by Akasaka et al. in 2003 [3]. In 2006 the species was formally described by Ueki et al. and the genus Paludibacter was introduced [2]. No further isolates have been obtained for P. propionicigenes, however, cultivation-independent 16S rRNA-dependent molecular investigations showed the presence of P. propionicigenes in the rumen of sheep [4]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for P. propionicigenes WB4T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of strain WB4T was compared using NCBI BLAST under default values (e.g., considering only the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [5] and the relative frequencies, of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stems [6]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genus was Dysgonomonas (100%) (8 hits in total). Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides, which corresponded to an identity of 91.9% and a HSP coverage of 83.6%. The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AY212569 ('water 10 m downstream manure clone 118ds10'), which showed an identity of 99.6% and a HSP coverage of 100.1%. The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'digest' (11.7%), 'anaerob' (6.2%), 'sludge' (6.1%), 'wastewater' (6.0%) and 'mesophile' (5.9%) (241 hits in total). The single most frequent keyword within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species was 'downstream/manure/water' (33.3%) (1 hit in total).

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of P. propionicigenes WB4T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The three identical 16S rRNA sequences in the genome differ by one nucleotide from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AB078842).

Figure 1
Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of P. propionicigenes relative to the other type strains within the family Porphyromonadaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,400 aligned characters [7,8] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood ...

The cells of P. propionicigenes are generally rod-shaped (0.5-0.6 μm × 1.3-1.7 µm) with ends that are round or slightly tapered [2]. Elongated cells can also be seen, either as single cells or in short chains (Figure 2). P. propionicigenes is a Gram-negative and non spore-forming bacterium (Table 1). The organism is described to be nonmotile; only eight genes associated with motility were identified in the genome. The organism is strictly anaerobic and chemoorganotrophic [2,3]. The temperature range for growth is between 15°C and 35°C, with an optimum at 30°C [2]. The organism does not grow at 37°C [2]. The pH range for growth is 5.0-7.6 with an optimum at pH 6.6 [2]. NaCl concentrations from 0-0.5% (w/v) are tolerated. P. propionicigenes is able to utilize arabinose, glucose, fructose, xylose, cellobiose, galactose, mannose, maltose, melibiose, glycogen and soluble starch as growth substrates [2]. The organism does not utilize ribose, lactose, sucrose, melezitose, raffinose, sorbose, rhamnose, trehalose, cellulose, xylan, salicin, dulcitol, inositol, mannitol, sorbitol, ethanol, glycerol, fumarate, malate, lactate, succinate or pyruvate [2]. Glucose is fermented to propionate and acetate in a molar ratio of 2:1 as major products and succinate as a minor product [2]. The organism does not reduce nitrate, it does not hydrolyze gelatin or urea and does not produce indole or hydrogen sulfide [2]. P. propionicigenes does not grow in the presence of bile salts. Catalase and oxidase are not present in the organism [2].

Figure 2
Scanning electron micrograph of P. propionicigenes WB4T
Table 1
Classification and general features of P. propionicigenes WB4T according to the MIGS recommendations [14].

Chemotaxonomy

Little chemotaxonomic data are available for strain WB4T. Only the fatty acid composition has been elucidated. The major fatty acids found were anteiso-C15:0 (30.8%), C15:0 (19.0%) and 3-hydroxy anteiso-C17:0 (17.9%) [2]. Also, iso-C17:0 3-OH (6.2%) and C16:0 (4.9%) were detected in intermediate amounts whereas iso-C15:0 3-OH, iso-C16:0 3-OH, C15:0 3-OH, C16:03-OH, iso-C15:0, C14:0, C16:0, and C18:0 were present in minor amounts (1% to 5% of the total fatty acids). Unsaturated fatty acids were not detected [2].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [20], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [21]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [11] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2
Genome sequencing project information

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

P. propionicigenes WB4T, DSM 17365, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 104 [22] at 30°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using a MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/DL for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [21].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [23]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.3-PreRelease-10-21-2009-gcc-4.1.2-threads (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 26 contigs in one scaffold which was converted into a phrap assembly by [24] making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (967 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [25] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 93.4 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [23], Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI) [26]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 124 additional reactions and one shatter library were necessary to close the gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [27]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 365.7 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 333,397 pyrosequence and 34,564,373 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [28] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [29]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [30].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 3,685,504 bp long chromosome with a GC content of 38.9% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,118 genes predicted, 3,054 were protein-coding genes, and 64 RNAs; 34 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (65.8%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.

Table 3
Genome Statistics
Figure 3
Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
Table 4
Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Sabine Welnitz (DSMZ) for growing P. propionicigenes cultures. This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2.

References

1. Garrity G. NamesforLife. BrowserTool takes expertise out of the database and puts it right in the browser. Microbiol Today 2010; 7:1.
2. Ueki A, Akasaka H, Suzuki D, Ueki K. Paludibacter propionicigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel strictly anaerobic, Gram-negative, propionate-producing bacterium isolated from plant residue in irrigated rice-field soil in Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:39-44. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63896-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Akasaka H, Izawa T, Ueki K, Ueki A. Phylogeny of numerically abundant culturable anaerobic bacteria associated with degradation of rice plant residue in Japanese paddy field soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2003; 43:149-161. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01054.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Pei CX, Liu Q, Dong CS, Li H, Jiang JB, Gao WJ. Diversity and abundance of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in forestomach of alpacas (Lama pacos) and sheep (Ovis aries). Anaerobe 2010; 16:426-432. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.06.004. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL. Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:5069-5072. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Porter MF. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program: electronic library and information systems 1980; 14:130-137.
7. Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452-464. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540-552. [PubMed]
9. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758-771. doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How Many Bootstrap Replicates Are Necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541:184-200. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_13. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D346-D354. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp848. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Xu J, Mahowald MA, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Martens EC, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Minx P, Latreille P, et al. Evolution of symbiotic bacteria in the distal human intestine. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:e156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050156. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Naito M, Hirakawa H, Yamashita A, Ohara N, Shoji M, Yukitake H, Nakayama K, Toh H, Yoshimura F, Kuhara S, et al. Determination of the genome sequence of Porphyromonas gingivalis strain ATCC 33277 and genomic comparison with strain W83 revealed extensive genome rearrangements in P. gingivalis. DNA Res 2008; 15:215-225. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn013. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547. doi: 10.1038/nbt1360. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Taxonomic Outline of the Archaea and BacteriaIn: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 155-166.
17. Ludwig W, Euzeby J, Whitman WG. Draft taxonomic outline of the Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Chlamydiae, Spirochaetes, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Dictyoglomi, and Gemmatimonadetes http://www.bergeys.org/outlines/Bergeys_Vol_4_Outline.pdfTaxonomic Outline 2008.
18. BAuA Classification of bacteria and archaea in risk groups. TRBA 2005; 466:84.
19. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Klenk HP, Goeker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol 2010; 33:175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.003. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056-1060. doi: 10.1038/nature08656. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. List of growth media used at DSMZ: http//www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php.
23. DOE Joint Genome Institute http://www.jgi.doe.gov
24. Phrap and Phred for Windows. MacOS, Linux, and Unix. http://www.phrap.com.
25. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 2008; 18:821-829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Han C, Chain P. 2006. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. in Proceeding of the 2006 international conference on bioinformatics & computational biology. Edited by Hamid R. Arabnia & Homayoun Valafar, CSREA Press. June 26- 29, 2006: 141-146.30.
27. Lapidus A, LaButti K, Foster B, Lowry S, Trong S, Goltsman E. POLISHER: An effective tool for using ultra short reads in microbial genome assembly and finishing. AGBT, Marco Island, FL, 2008.
28. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods 2010; 7:455-457. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1457. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
30. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271-2278. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Standards in Genomic Sciences are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central