Microbiologists, spearheaded by Louis Pasteur, have devised ways to generate vaccines by inactivating pathogens. Most of these vaccines act through the induction of humoral responses [
75]. However, there are still many pathogens, for which no efficient vaccines are available, including HIV, Hepatitis C virus, Mycobacteria, Chlamydia, and Plasmodium, a parasite causing malaria. Most of these agents cause chronic diseases where strong cellular immunity, in particular CTL response, is critical for the clearance of the pathogens.
Studies on the functional characterizations of human DC subsets provide an opportunity for the novel design of therapies and vaccines. DC-based vaccines include two main approaches:
ex-vivo generated DC vaccines and DC targeting. We will discuss here how DC subsets can be harnessed in a DC-targeting approach. For further details on
ex-vivo generated DC vaccines the readers are encouraged to further read detailed reviews [
76,
77].
DC targeting represents a vaccine approach to deliver antigens directly to DCs in vivo using chimeric proteins composed of an anti-DC receptor antibody and an antigen (). Pioneering studies by Michel Nussenzweig and Ralph Steinman with antibodies directed to DEC205 demonstrated that
in vivo DC targeting results in a potent induction of antigen-specific CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cell responses in mice, provided adjuvants are co-administered to activate the targeted DCs [
78,
79]. The same group also elegantly proved in vivo, by using the DC-targeting approach, the concept of differential regulation of T cell immunity by distinct DC subsets [
11]. There, antigens were selectively loaded
in vivo onto distinct DC subsets, CD8α
+ DCs expressing DEC205, or CD8α
− DCs expressing DCIR2, by using specific antibodies conjugated with OVA. CD8α
+ DCs preferentially induce CD8
+ T cell immunity, while CD8α
− DCs preferentially induce CD4
+ T cell immunity. Accordingly, CD8α
− DCs and CD8α
+ DCs preferentially express distinct sets of genes involved in MHC class II and class I presentation, respectively [
11]. Furthermore, these subsets utilize different mechanisms for the induction of Th1 response. The DEC205
+DCIR2
−CD8
+ DCs prime T cells to make IFN-γ in an IL-12-independent CD70-dependent fashion, while the DEC205
−DCIR2
+CD8
− DCs prime T cells in an IL-12-dependent fashion [
80].
Our own studies with human skin DC subsets suggest that LCs are a target to consider for the induction of potent antigen-specific CTL response. Indeed, LCs targeted with a fusion protein composed of anti-DCIR antibody conjugated with antigens efficiently cross-present antigens to CD8
+ T cells, and induce their proliferation in vitro [
37]. Similar finding was also obtained when LCs were targeted with anti-Langerin antibody [
37]. Furthermore, mouse studies demonstrated that injection of anti-Langerin chimeric proteins induce antigen-specific CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cell responses in vivo [
81]. These observations provide a rationale that LCs can be utilized as a target in DC-targeting aiming at induction of CTL responses. In contrast, dermal CD14
+ DCs might represent the appropriate target for the induction of potent humoral response. There, LOX-1 and DC-SIGN expressed by this subset may serve as the target DC receptors. Supporting evidence is that delivering antigens to DCs via DC-SIGN can elicit CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cell responses both in vitro [
82] and in vivo [
83,
84]. CLEC9A may represent an interesting target to reach CD141
+ DCs. Indeed, mouse studies showed that targeting antigen to CLEC9A expressed by CD8α
+ DCs
in vivo results in potent cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses when combined with anti-CD40 administration [
54], and potent antibody responses even without co-administration of adjuvants [
55].
In DC-targeting approach, selection of the appropriate adjuvant is a critical parameter for the induction of the immunity of the desired type (). For example, although TLR-ligands are widely considered to promote protective immunity against infectious agents, selecting the appropriate ligand will be critical. For instance, TLR2 ligation, which promotes the induction of Treg cells rather than Th1 or Th17 cells [
85], does not appear to be a preferred option in vaccines for cancer or infectious diseases. Our studies suggest that DCs exposed in vitro to anti-DCIR fusion protein induce different types of antigen-specific CD8
+ T cell responses, when activated through different pathways. Thus, CD8
+ T cells primed by DCIR-targeted DCs (generated by culturing monocytes with GM-CSF and IFN-α) activated through CD40 secrete Type 2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) together with IFN-γ, while those primed by DCs activated through TLR7/8 secrete no Type 2 cytokines, but higher levels of IFN-γ, and express more Granzymes and perforin [
37].
Furthermore, certain lectins, for example Dectin-1 delivers activation signals to DCs. Dectin-1 recognize components expressed by fungi and mycobacteria, and deliver activation signals [
83-
85] through phosphorylation of tyrosine residues within the cytoplasmic ITAM motifs [
86-
89]. Syk and Card9 are recruited to the ITAM motifs [
90-
93], which leads to the activation of downstream molecules such as NFAT [
94], MAPK [
95], and NF-κB [
88,
90,
96-
99]. DCs stimulated through Dectin-1 secrete multiple cytokines, including IL-10, IL-6, TNFα, and IL-23 [
91,
97,
100], which leads to the induction and expansion of Th17 cell responses [
90,
91]. Targeting antigen to DCs via Dectin-1 generated strong CD4
+ T cell responses, but weak CD8
+ T cell responses in vivo in mice [
101]. In contrast, our recent study shows that human monocyte-derived DCs incubated with recombinant proteins of an agonistic anti-Dectin-1 fused to antigens can elicit potent antigen-specific CD8
+ T cell responses in vitro [
102]. DC-SIGN is another lectin that can deliver intracellular signals [
103-
107]. DC-SIGN triggering activates RAF1, which induces the phosphorylation of the NF-κB subunit p65 in a TLR-independent manner [
107]. Thus, the challenge is to match the molecular target on DCs with the desired immune outcome, mimicking in many ways the natural role of these DC receptors to fine tune responses appropriate to the infection.
Another consideration is the localization of the target DCs and the tropism of the T cells activated by the DCs. DCs originating from a specific tissue have the capacity to instruct T cells to home back to that tissue [
108]. Furthermore, DCs activated by different adjuvants might induce T cells with different migration properties. As optimal sites for T cell migration likely vary in different disease states, assessing this aspect is important for the design of vaccines. For example, whereas vaccines against cancer are expected to induce T cells that migrate into tumor sites, vaccines against influenza virus are desired to induce T cells to migrate into airway mucosal surfaces.
Therefore, multiple parameters need to be considered for the development of DC targeting vaccines (). These include: 1) biological function of target DC subsets (for example, induction of humoral and/or cellular immunity), 2) the selection of antigens and their formulation to control the disease, 3) the receptors expressed by a given DC subset together with the choice of adjuvant, and 4) the tissue distribution of the target DCs. Further studies on the biology of human DC subsets will facilitate the design of efficient DC targeting approaches.