Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Obstet Gynecol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 April 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3069855

Association Between the Birth of Twins and Parental Divorce

Anupam B. Jena, M.D., Ph.D.,corresponding author1 Dana P. Goldman, Ph.D.,2 and Geoffrey Joyce, Ph.D.3



Mothers of multiple births face higher rates of postpartum depression, yet evidence on the marital consequences of multiple births is limited. We examined the association between twin births and parental divorce.


We used the 1980 United States Census to identify a large sample of mothers with and without twin births. The goal was to estimate multivariate logistic models of the association between birth of twins and divorce, adjusting for race, age at marriage and first birth, and college education. We examined whether the association was affected by maternal education, age and gender composition of twins, and family size.


Twins at first birth were associated with greater parental divorce compared to singletons (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16; absolute risk 13.7% with twins vs 12.7%, p = 0.02). The association was statistically greater among mothers not attending college (14.9% with twins vs 13.3%, p = 0.01) compared to those with some college (10.4% with twins vs 10.5%, p = 0.34); those with children older than 8 years (15.6% with twins vs 13.5%, p < 0.01) compared to younger children (10.6% with twins vs 10.8%, p = 0.42); and those with at least one twin girl (13.8% with twins vs 12.6%, p = 0.03) compared to twin boys (12.1% with twins vs 12.5%, p = 0.38). Mothers with four or more children had a larger association between birth of twins and divorce (15.4% for mothers with twins at fourth birth vs 11.3% for all other mothers with four or more children, p < 0.01) compared to mothers with twins at first through third births (13.7% for twins at first birth vs 12.7%, p = 0.02).


Health consequences of twin births for children and mothers are well known. Twin births may be associated with longer-term parental divorce. Specific groups, namely mothers not completing college and mothers who already have more children, may be at higher risk.


The rate of multiple births in the US increased dramatically in the last three decades, from 19.3 per 1,000 births in 1980 to 32.1 per 1,000 births in 2005.1 Much of this recent increase can be attributed to the both the growing use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the last three decades as well as the delayed average age of childbearing.2 Risks associated with multiple births include an increased risk of congenital anomalies, prematurity, and low birth weight3, 4, 5. Multiple births have important medical and non-medical consequences for mothers as well, including increased rates of postpartum depression compared to mothers of singletons.6 Multiple births also reduce labor force participation by mothers79, reduce educational spending towards siblings of children born in multiple births9, and are associated with higher rates of divorce (though the timing of divorce and factors impacting the association have not been explored).9, 10

In light of these important socioeconomic consequences of multiple births, we more closely examined the association of naturally conceived twin births on one specific outcome: short- and long-term marital stability. Using the large sample size and span of time afforded by the United States Census, we identified mothers who had twin births and compared their short- and long-term divorce rates (defined as occurring before or after twins turned eight years old) to mothers without twins. We also examined how this association was affected by college education of the mother, the gender composition of the twins, and the number of children a mother had prior to having twins.



A natural difficulty of examining the association of twin births with any socioeconomic outcome is that the frequency of twin births is low. To ensure a sufficient number of observations on twin births, we used data from the A and B samples of the 1980 United States Census Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), which constitutes a nearly 6% sample of the entire US population in 1980. The A sample contains data representing 5% of the US population and samples from all states and various subdivisions within them, including most counties with 100,000 or more inhabitants. The B sample contains data for an additional 1% of the population but contrary to the A sample, samples households in metropolitan areas which are too small to be separately identified and/or which cross state boundaries. Data included in the PUMS are drawn from the Census questionnaire and include no additional information. While Census data has primarily been used outside the field of medicine, it provides a unique opportunity to examine the marital consequences of twin births, a task that has been difficult to achieve in earlier medical studies due to limited sample sizes. The Census data is publicly available and de-identified and therefore was exempt from review by the Institutional Review Board of the corresponding author’s institution.

The Census samples households, and the PUMS data is organized such that each record in the data identifies an individual in a particular household, their relationship to the head of the household, and a number of demographic and socioeconomic variables pertinent to them. Since we were primarily interested in the association of twin births with divorce, we restricted our data to include only those women who reported ever being married, who at the time of the Census were living with all children they ever reported having delivered, and who had at least one child, the oldest of whom was younger than 18 years.

We identified twin births as children in a household sharing the same year and quarter of birth, following established methods.810 We limited our attention to twin births since triplets and beyond occurred at a substantially lower frequency. Twins conceived in this sample predate the introduction of ART (1978) and were therefore a result of natural conception. Despite its age and arguable applicability to recent secular trends in divorce, the 1980 Census was the last to record both the year and quarter of birth of each child and was therefore the last Census to permit identification of such a large sample of couples giving birth to twins. Although restricting the sample to women with all children living at home would omit divorced women with child custody awarded to the father, the restriction was not only necessary to correctly identify twins but is unlikely to be important given the majority of child custody is awarded to the mother.

Our primary outcome of interest was divorce. Because the Census details the relationships between each member of a household, e.g. if they are biologically related or not, we were able to identify those mothers who divorced after conceiving twins by whether they: (1) reported ever being divorced and (2) did not have the biological father living in the household. When both conditions were met, a female was considered to have divorced some time after conceiving twins.

Statistical analysis

We estimated multivariate logistic models of the probability of divorce, with our baseline model comparing mothers with twins at first birth to a control group of mothers without twins at first birth. Following established methods, we focused on first births because all couples choosing to have children must start with the first birth, whereas those choosing to have more than one child may have unobserved characteristics that, even after adjusting for number of children, are correlated with the likelihood of divorce.8, 9 We adjusted for mother’s age at marriage (linear), age at first birth (linear), a categorical indicator variable for whether the mother had any college education, and a categorical indicator variable for whether the mother was white. Importantly, although the Census collects detailed information on work status and income, these variables are measured at the time of the survey and may not reflect the socioeconomic condition of the mother at the time of divorce8; we therefore did not consider these variables as independent variables in our final analyses, though our results were invariant to their inclusion. Finally, because the Census sampled mothers at a given point in time, mothers who had earlier ages at first marriage would have higher likelihoods of being divorced at the time of Census sampling. We therefore included as a covariate the number of years elapsed from the age at marriage to the age at Census survey date.

In addition to our baseline model, we examined whether maternal education (college education or not), age of twins (younger or older than 8 years), and gender of twins (at least one girl versus male twins) modified the estimated association between twins at first birth and divorce. For each effect modification, we estimated a separate multivariate logistic model in which twins at first birth was interacted with the effect-modifying variable of interest. Each model adjusted for maternal age at first marriage, age at first birth, and indicators for any college attendance and being white. We also analyzed whether family size (defined as one, two, three, or four or more children prior to birth of twins) modified the association between birth of twins and divorce. We estimated a multivariate logistic model with the same set of controls as well as interactions between birth of twins at each order and indicator terms for family size at the time of twin birth.

STATA version 10 was used for statistical analyses and the 95% CI around reported odds ratios (OR) reflects .025 in each tail or P ≤ .05.


Our sample selection resulted in 841,442 women with at least one birth, 13,824 of which had twin births at any point in the birth order. Among mothers with twins, 6,224 had twins at first birth, 4,967 at second birth, 2,064 at third birth, and 607 at fourth birth. These figures result in a probability of twins at first birth of roughly 0.0074—very close to estimates from the 1965 and 1973 National Survey of Family Growth.7 Within all twin births, 35% were comprised of two boys, 36% with two girls, and the remainder with one boy and one girl.

Demographics of mothers with twins at any birth, twins at first birth, and those without twins were comparable (Table 1). Mothers with twins had similar ages at first birth and marriage, were equally likely to have at least some college education, and were slightly less likely to be white compared to mothers without twins. Mothers with twins at first birth had, on average, 0.7 more children than those without; the difference was not equal to one because mothers with singletons at first birth were more likely to have additional children prior to the date of Census survey than mothers with twins. While couples with twins (at any birth and first birth) had slightly higher rates of divorce, this difference was not statistically significant using χ2 testing at p < 0.05.

Table 1
Characteristics of mothers with and without twins, US Census data, 1980

Maternal age at first birth and race are known to affect the probability of twinning and may confound the unadjusted association (or lack thereof) between the birth of twins and divorce. African-American women and those delaying first birth are more likely to give birth to twins.11 To account for potential confounding, we estimated multivariate logistic models of the association between birth of twins and subsequent divorce (Table 2). Compared to mothers without twins at first birth, mothers with twins had higher rates of divorce (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16; predicted absolute risk 13.7% vs 12.7%, p = 0.02). Women who had children later, married later, had at least some college education, and were white were also less likely to divorce.

Table 2
Adjusted odds ratios of the association between birth of twins at first birth and divorce, US Census data, 1980

Several variables modified the association between twins at first birth and divorce (Table 3). Adjusting for age at marriage, age at first birth, and an indicator for being white, the association between twins at first birth and divorce was statistically greater (p = 0.04) among mothers without any college education (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04–1.20; absolute risk 14.9% with twins vs 13.3%, p = 0.01) compared to mothers with at least some college (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94–1.04; absolute risk 10.4% with twins vs 10.5%, p = 0.34). Birth of twins was also associated with divorce only when twins were between the ages of eight and eighteen (Table 3). Adjusting for the same covariates, the association between twins at first birth and divorce was statistically larger (p < 0.01) when twins were older than 8 years (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05–1.24; absolute risk 15.6% with twins vs 13.5%, p < 0.01) compared to younger (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84–1.07; absolute risk 10.6% with twins vs 10.8%, p = 0.42). Twins at first birth were associated with divorce when couples had at least one twin girl (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07–1.25; absolute risk 13.8% with twins vs 12.6%, p = 0.03); this association was statistically greater (p = 0.02) than among couples with twin boys, who exhibited no statistically significant difference in divorce when compared to mothers without twin births (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84–1.08; absolute risk 12.1% with twins vs 12.5%, p = 0.38).

Table 3
Multivariable logistic models showing effect of mother’s education, age of twins, and gender of twins on adjusted odds ratios of association between twin births and divorce, US Census data, 1980

Adjusting for age at marriage, age at first birth, and indicators for college attendance and being white, family size prior to birth of twins had mixed effects on the association between birth of twins and divorce (Table 4). Couples giving birth to twins at first through third births had higher rates of divorce when compared to mothers delivering singletons at the respective birth, but these associations were not statistically significant from one another. For example, adjusted rates of divorce associated with twins at second and third birth were 1.11 (95% CI 1.03–1.23; absolute risk 11.9% with twins vs 10.7%) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.01–1.25; absolute risk 11.5% with twins vs 10.3%), respectively. Twins at fourth birth, however, were associated with divorce rates (OR 1.36, 95% 1.08–1.65; absolute risk 15.4% with twins vs 11.3%, p < 0.01) that were statistically greater than estimated associations for twins at first through third births, p = 0.04.

Table 4
Multivariable logistic model showing effect of family size at the time of twin birth on adjusted odds ratio of association between birth of twins and divorce, US Census data, 1980


Using large samples from the 1980 U.S. Census, we found that birth of twins was associated with divorce. The size of the association was largest among mothers without any college education, those with twins older than eight, and those with at least one twin girl. Couples with four or more children prior to having twins had a significantly larger association between twins and divorce than couples with twins earlier in the birth order.

While the nature of the Census data allowed us to evaluate the potential impact on martial stability of a relatively rare event – the incidence of twin births – it cannot inform us as to why the observed association occurs. Most couples experience some disruption in their relationship when they have a first child and these effects may be exacerbated by twin births. It is perhaps not surprising, then, that prior studies find that a first child substantially increases parental well-being, while additional children beyond the first child can have a negative effect on the subjective well-being of the mother.12, 13

One might speculate that the financial, emotional, and time costs of simultaneously added children may play a large role, particularly among families with large numbers of children already. This is certainly plausible given evidence that postpartum depression rises in mothers conceiving multiple births.6 Our results specifically suggest that the potential impact of twins on divorce may, in fact, be greatest in the longer term, when children are older. This is important because most prior studies have focused on outcomes immediately post-partum or during the first year after birth. Twin births may have only long-term impacts on divorce if parents delay divorce out of fear of harming their young children or if the stresses associated with having an an additional child rise with age.

Our results on the importance of gender composition directly relate to findings by others that child gender affects the marital stability of a significant number of American families.14 In the United States, for example, parents with first-born daughters are significantly more likely to end up divorced.14 Divorcing fathers are also more likely to seek custody of sons than daughters14 Postulated mechanisms include gender preference by parents, a belief that sons will be more negatively affected by divorce than daughters, and greater monetary, psychological, or time costs of raising daughters compared to sons.14 Indeed, there is evidence that fathers play a greater role in child development for sons and that divorce has greater psychological effects on boys than girls.15 The average, annual monetary cost of raising daughters also exceeds the cost of raising boys by nearly one thousand dollars.16 Our finding that divorces tend to occur later in marriage may speak to the fact that gender differences between children become more important as children grow older.

Our findings have several implications. Although much is known about the clinical consequences of twin births, limitations of data have prohibited a full understanding of some of the longer term social consequences. Clinicians involved in the care of families conceiving twins may benefit from knowledge of the long-term marital consequences of these births. In this sense, our recommendations closely mirror those by Choi et al. who argue that mothers of multiple births be more carefully monitored for postpartum depression.6 Our results also indicate that non-college educated mothers may be more likely to divorce after conceiving twins, suggesting that counseling and monitoring for lower educated mothers may be warranted. Similarly, mothers with large families already may benefit from additional counseling when conceiving twins.

Our study has several important limitations. First, the census data represents the divorce experiences of women more than three decades ago. Secular trends impacting divorce may affect the association between twins and divorce among mothers today. Survey limitations on censuses subsequent to the 1980 census prohibited us from identifying a more contemporary cohort of mothers with twins. The age of the data also limits our ability to understand the experiences of women with twins arising from ART, a technology that became widely used years after the survey date. Since women conceiving via ART may be different than those who conceive multiples spontaneously, our results cannot be directly extrapolated to multiples from ART pregnancies. Second, the estimated association between twins and divorce is small and may reflect residual confounding, even after adjusting for race and maternal age. A third limitation of our analysis is potential mis-measurement of twins, divorce, and other variables occurring at or before the time of divorce. For example, mothers who divorced but had child custody awarded to the father were unable to be included in our analysis. Maternal education, as asked at the time of survey, may also not reflect education at the time of divorce if women went back to school after divorce. Despite these limitations, it is important for physicians to be cognizant of the potential long-term impacts of these births for families.


Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Medical Scientist National Research Award Grant 5 T32 GM07281 and Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Training Grant T32 HS 000046 (Dr. Jena)


Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Financial Disclosure: The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.


1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57(7)
2. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2006 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports, Atlanta US: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 2008.Reproductive Technology. 2006 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Atlanta US: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.
3. Blondel B, Kogan MD, Alexander GR, et al. The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight: an international study. Am J Public Health. 2002 Aug;92(8):1323–1330. [PubMed]
4. Klemetti R, Sevon T, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Health of children born as a result of in vitro fertilization. Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):1819–1827. [PubMed]
5. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 7;346(10):731–737. [PubMed]
6. Choi Y, Bishai D, Minkovitz CS. Multiple births are a risk factor for postpartum maternal depressive symptoms. Pediatrics. 2009 Apr;123(4):1147–1154. [PubMed]
7. Rosenzweig MR, Wolpin K. Life-Cycle Labor Supply and Fertility: Causal Inferences from Household Models. Journal of Political Economy. 1980;88(2):328–348.
8. Bronars SG, Grogger J. The Economic Consequences of Unwed Motherhood: Using Twin Births as a Natural Experiment. The American Economic Review. 1994;84(5):1141–1156.
9. Caceres-Delpiano J. The Impacts of Family Size on Investment in Child Quality. J. Human Resources. 2006 October 1;XLI(4):738–754. 2006.
10. Jacobsen JP, Pearce JW, Rosenbloom JL. The effects of child-bearing on women's marital status: using twin births as a natural experiment. Economics Letters. 2001;70(1):133–138.
11. Oleszczuk JJ, Cervantes A, Kiely JL, Keith DM, Keith LG. Maternal race/ethnicity and twinning rates in the United States, 1989–1991. J Reprod Med. 2001 Jun;46(6):550–557. [PubMed]
12. Worthington EL, Jr, Buston BG. The Marriage Relationship During the Transition to Parenthood: A Review and a Model. Journal of Family Issues. 1986 December 1;7(4):443–473. 1986.
13. Kohler H-P, Behrman JR, Skytthe A. Partner + Children = Happiness? The Effects of Partnerships and Fertility on Well-Being. Population and Development Review. 2005;31:407–445.
14. Moretti E, Dahl GB. The Demand for Sons. Review of Economic Studies. 2008;75:35.
15. Hetherington E, Cox M, Cox R. The Aftermath of divorce in mother-child, father-child relationships. National Association for the Education of Young Children; 1978.
16. Olson L. Costs of Children. Lexington, Massachusetts: Heath and Company; 1983.