1. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, et al. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications. 2000;10:689–710.
2. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics. 2005;52:273–288.
3. Simberloff D. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conservation Biology. 2003;17:83–92.
5. Roura-Pascual N, Suarez AV, Gomez C, Pons P, Touyama Y, et al. Geographical potential of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile Mayr) in the face of global climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 2004;271:2527–2534. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 6. Peterson AT, Stewart A, Mohamed KI, Araújo MB. Shifting Global Invasive Potential of European Plants with Climate Change. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(6):e2441. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P, Midgley GF, Hughes GO, et al. Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biology. 2005;11:2234–2250.
8. Bradley BA, Oppenheimer M, Wilcove DS. Climate change and plant invasions: restoration opportunities ahead? Global Change Biology. 2009;15:1511–1521.
9. Walther GR, Roques A, Hulme PE, Sykes MT, Pysek P, et al. Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2009;24:686–693. [PubMed] 10. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, et al. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews. 2006;81:163–182. [PubMed] 11. Cox JG, Lima SL. Naivete and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2006;21:674–680. [PubMed]
12. Bohonak AJ, Jenkins DG. Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecology Letters. 2003;6:783–796.
13. Rahel FJ. Biogeographic barriers, connectivity and homogenization of freshwater faunas: it's a small world after all. Freshwater Biology. 2007;52:696–710.
14. Woodward G, Perkins DM, Brown LE. Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: impacts across multiple levels of organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2010;365:2093–2106. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Truscott AM, Soulsby C, Palmer SCF, Newell L, Hulme PE. The dispersal characteristics of the invasive plant Mimulus guttatus and the ecological significance of increased occurrence of high-flow events. Journal of Ecology. 2006;94:1080–1091.
16. Rahel FJ, Olden JD. Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conservation Biology. 2008;22:521–533. [PubMed]
17. Araújo MB, Guisan A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography. 2006;33:1677–1688.
18. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araújo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, et al. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography. 2006;30:751–777.
19. Guisan A, Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters. 2005;8:993–1009.
20. Peterson A, Holt R. Niche differentiation in Mexican birds: using point occurrences to detect ecological innovation. Ecology Letters. 2003;6:774–782.
21. Mau-Crimmins TM, Schussman HR, Geiger EL. Can the invaded range of a species be predicted sufficiently using only native-range data? Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana) in the southwestern United States. Ecological Modelling. 2006;193:736–746.
22. Broennimann O, Treier UA, Muller-Scharer H, Thuiller W, Peterson AT, et al. Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecology Letters. 2007;10:701–709. [PubMed] 23. Broennimann O, Guisan A. Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. Biology Letters. 2008;4:585–589. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Beaumont LJ, Gallagher RV, Thuiller W, Downey PO, Leishman MR, et al. Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions. Diversity and Distributions. 2009;15:409–420.
25. Rödder D, Lötters S. Niche shift versus niche conservatism? Climatic characteristics of the native and invasive ranges of the Mediterranean house gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus). Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2009;18:674–687.
26. Ilhéu M, Bernardo J, Fernandes S. Biological invaders in inland waters: Profiles, distribution, and threats; 2007. Predation of invasive crayfish on aquatic vertebrates: the effect of Procambarus clarkii on fish assemblages in Mediterranean temporary streams. pp. 543–558.
27. Drake JA. Invading nature-Springer series in invasion ecology; 2009. Handbook of alien species in Europe.
28. Correia AM. Niche breadth and trophic diversity: feeding behaviour of the red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) towards environmental availability of aquatic macroinvertebrates in a rice field (Portugal). Acta Oecologica. 2002;23:421–429.
29. Olsson K, Stenroth P, Nystrom P, Graneli W. Invasions and niche width: does niche width of an introduced crayfish differ from a native crayfish? Freshwater Biology. 2009;54:1731–1740.
30. Huner J. Procambarus in North America and elsewhere. In: Holdich DM, Lowery RS, editors. Freshwater crayfish: Biology, management and exploitation. London: Croom Helm Press; 1988. pp. 239–261.
31. Aquiloni L, Ilheu M, Gherardi F. Habitat use and dispersal of the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in ephemeral water bodies of Portugal. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology. 2005;38:225–236.
32. Gherardi F, Barbaresi S, Salvi G. Spatial and temporal patterns in the movement of Procambarus clarkii, an invasive crayfish. Aquatic Sciences. 2000;62:179–193.
33. Cruz MJ, Rebelo R. Colonization of freshwater habitats by an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, in Southwest Iberian Peninsula. Hydrobiologia. 2007;575:191–201.
34. Barbaresi S, Gherardi F. The invasion of the alien crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe, with particular reference to Italy. Biological Invasions. 2000;2:259–264.
35. Yue GH, Li JL, Bai ZY, Wang CM, Feng FLC. Genetic diversity and population structure of the invasive alien red swamp crayfish. Biological Invasions. 2010;12:2697–2706.
36. Smart AC, Harper DM, Malaisse F, Schmitz S, Coley S, et al. Feeding of the exotic Louisiana red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Crustacea, Decapoda), in an African tropical lake: Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Hydrobiologia. 2002;488:129–142.
37. Correia AM. Food choice by the introduced crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Annales Zoologici Fennici. 2003;40:517–528.
38. Gil-Sanchez JM, Alba-Tercedor J. Ecology of the native and introduced crayfishes Austropotamobius pallipes and Procambarus clarkii in southern Spain and implications for conservation of the native species. Biological Conservation. 2002;105:75–80.
39. Rodriguez CF, Becares E, Fernandez-Alaez M, Fernandez-Alaez C. Loss of diversity and degradation of wetlands as a result of introducing exotic crayfish. Biological Invasions. 2005;7:75–85.
40. Geiger W, Alcorlo P, Baltanas A, Montes C. Impact of an introduced Crustacean on the trophic webs of Mediterranean wetlands. Biological Invasions. 2005;7:49–73.
41. Gherardi F, Acquistapace P. Invasive crayfish in Europe: the impact of Procambarus clarkii on the littoral community of a Mediterranean lake. Freshwater Biology. 2007;52:1249–1259.
42. Witte CL, Sredl MJ, Kane AS, Hungerford LL. Epidemiologic analysis of factors associated with local disappearances of native ranid frogs in Arizona. Conservation Biology. 2008;22:375–383. [PubMed]
43. Cruz M, Rebelo R. Vulnerability of Southwest Iberian amphibians to an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Amphibia-Reptilia. 2005;26:293–303.
44. Correia AM, Ferreira O. Burrowing Behavior of the Introduced Red Swamp Crayfish Procambarus Clarkii (Decapoda, Cambaridae) in Portugal. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 1995;15:248–257.
45. Anastácio P, Marques J. Crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, effects on initial stages of rice growth in the lower Mondego River valley (Portugal). Freshwater crayfish. 1997;11:608–617.
46. Gherardi F. Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution and Threats; 2007. Understanding the impact of invasive crayfish.
47. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 2005;25:1965–1978.
48. Caissie D. The thermal regime of rivers: a review. Freshwater Biology. 2006;51:1389–1406.
49. Lasram FB, Guilhaumon F, Albouy C, Somot S, Thuiller W, et al. The Mediterranean Sea as a ‘cul-de-sac’ for endemic fishes facing climate change. Global Change Biology. 2010;16:3233–3245.
50. Capinha C, Anastácio P. Assessing the environmental requirements of invaders using ensembles of distribution models. Diversity and Distributions. 2010;17
51. Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Miaud C. Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species - the American bullfrog. Diversity and Distributions. 2007;13:476–485.
52. Ficetola GF, Thuiller W, Padoa-Schioppa E. From introduction to the establishment of alien species: bioclimatic differences between presence and reproduction localities in the slider turtle. Diversity and Distributions. 2009;15:108–116.
53. Buisson L, Thuiller W, Lek S, Lim P, Grenouillet G. Climate change hastens the turnover of stream fish assemblages. Global Change Biology. 2008;14:2232–2248.
54. Cordellier M, Pfenninger M. Climate-driven range dynamics of the freshwater limpet, Ancylus fluviatilis (Pulmonata, Basommatophora). Journal of Biogeography. 2008;35:1580–1592.
55. Kumar S, Spaulding SA, Stohlgren TJ, Hermann KA, Schmidt TS, et al. Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2009;7:415–420.
56. Beaumont LJ, Hughes L, Poulsen M. Predicting species distributions: use of climatic parameters in BIOCLIM and its impact on predictions of species' current and future distributions. Ecological Modelling. 2005;186:250–269.
57. Aragón P, Baselga A, Lobo JM. Global estimation of invasion risk zones for the western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera: integrating distribution models and physiological thresholds to assess climatic favourability. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2010;47:1026–1035.
58. Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Rueda A, Castien E, Bascones J. A plan of restoration in Navarra for the native freshwater crayfish species of Spain, Austropotamobius pallipes. Bulletin Francais De La Peche Et De La Pisciculture. 1997;70:625–637.
59. Wang SP, Ke ZW, Cai YF, Li YM. Distribution of introduced red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in permanent lentic water bodies on Zhoushan Archipelago of China and related affecting factors. Chinese Journal of Ecology. 2010;6:1175–1180.
60. Capinha C, Leung B, Anastácio P. Ecography; 2010. Predicting worldwide invasiveness for four major problematic decapods: an evaluation of using different calibration sets. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06369.x.
61. Poulin B, Lefebvre G, Crivelli AJ. The invasive red swamp crayfish as a predictor of Eurasian bittern density in the Camargue, France. Journal of Zoology. 2007;273:98–105.
62. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience. 2002;52:891–904.
63. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling. 2006;190:231–259.
64. Thuiller W, Broennimann O, Hughes G, Alkemade JRM, Midgley GF, et al. Vulnerability of African mammals to anthropogenic climate change under conservative land transformation assumptions. Global Change Biology. 2006;12:424–440.
65. Thuiller W. Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change. Global Change Biology. 2004;10:2020–2027.
66. Marmion M, Parviainen M, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Thuiller W. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions. 2009;15:59–69.
67. Araújo MB, Pearson RG. Equilibrium of species' distributions with climate. Ecography. 2005;28:693–695.
68. Phillips SJ, Dudik M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008;31:161–175.
69. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudik M, Ferrier S, et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography. 2006;29:129–151.
70. Peterson AT, Papes M, Eaton M. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography. 2007;30:550–560.
71. Liu CR, Berry PM, Dawson TP, Pearson RG. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography. 2005;28:385–393.
72. Jimenez-Valverde A, Lobo JM. Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology. 2007;31:361–369.
73. Brito JC, Santos X, Pleguezuelos JM, Sillero N. Inferring evolutionary scenarios with geostatistics and geographical information systems for the viperid snakes Vipera latastei and Vipera monticola. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2008;95:790–806.
74. Svenning JC, Normand S, Kageyama M. Glacial refugia of temperate trees in Europe: insights from species distribution modelling. Journal of Ecology. 2008;96:1117–1127.
75. Jarnevich CS, Reynolds LV. Challenges of predicting the potential distribution of a slow-spreading invader: a habitat suitability map for an invasive riparian tree. Biological Invasions. 2011;13:153–163.
76. Pearson RG, Raxworthy CJ, Nakamura M, Peterson AT. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. Journal of Biogeography. 2007;34:102–117.
77. Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2001;38:921–931.
78. Fielding AH, Bell JF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation. 1997;24:38–49.
79. VanDerWal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, William SE. Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: How far should you stray from what you know? Ecological Modelling. 2009;220:589–594.
80. Phillips SJ, Dudik M, Elith J, Graham CH, Lehmann A, et al. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications. 2009;19:181–197. [PubMed]
81. Raes N, ter Steege H. A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. Ecography. 2007;30:727–736.
82. Cuesta-Camocho F, Ganzenmuller A, Peralvo M, Novoa J, Riofrio G. Biodiversity Monitoring Program: EcoCiencia, Peru; 2006. Predicting species's niche distribution shifts and biodiversity change within climate change scenarios: a regional assessment for bird and plant species in the northern tropical Andes.
83. Dormann CF. Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2007;8:387–397.
84. Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N. Ecological-niche factor analysis: How to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology. 2002;83:2027–2036.
85. Araújo MB, Pearson RG, Thuiller W, Erhard M. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biology. 2005;11:1504–1513.
86. Hijmans RJ, Graham CH. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biology. 2006;12:2272–2281.
87. Gallagher RV, Beaumont LJ, Hughes L, Leishman MR. Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. Journal of Ecology. 2010;98:790–799.
88. Bradley BA, Mustard JF. Characterizing the landscape dynamics of an invasive plant and risk of invasion using remote sensing. Ecological Applications. 2006;16:1132–1147. [PubMed]
89. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, et al. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 2001;32:305–332.
90. Barbaresi S, Santini G, Tricarico E, Gherardi F. Ranging behaviour of the invasive crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard). Journal of Natural History. 2004;38:2821–2832.
91. Paglianti A, Gherardi F. Combined effects of temperature and diet on growth and survival of young-of-year crayfish: A comparison between indigenous and invasive species. Journal of Crustacean Biology. 2004;24:140–148.
92. Nilsson C, Berggren K. Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation. Bioscience. 2000;50:783–792.
93. Walther GR, Gritti ES, Berger S, Hickler T, Tang ZY, et al. Palms tracking climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2007;16:801–809.
94. ACI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Arctic climate impact assessment.
95. Mckenney DW, Pedlar JH, Lawrence K, Campbell K, Hutchinson MF. Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of North American trees. Bioscience. 2007;57:939–948.
96. Kerby JL, Riley SPD, Kats LB, Wilson P. Barriers and flow as limiting factors in the spread of an invasive crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in southern California streams. Biological Conservation. 2005;126:402–409.
97. Hulme PE. Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2006;43:835–847.
98. Liu X, Li Y. Aquaculture enclosures relate to the establishment of feral populations of introduced species. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(7):e6199. [PMC free article] [PubMed]