Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 November 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3058681

Selective Killing of Tumor Neo-Vasculature Paradoxically Improves Chemotherapy Delivery to Tumors


Anti-angiogenic therapies are frequently used with concomitantly administered cancer chemotherapy to improve outcomes, but the mechanism for the benefit of the combination is uncertain. We describe a mechanism by which a specific, cytotoxic anti-vascular agent causes vascular remodeling and improved chemotherapy results. By selectively killing tumor neovasculature using short-ranged alpha particles targeted to VE-cadherin on vascular endothelial cells (by use of 225Ac-labeled E4G10 antibody) we were able to both reduce tumor growth and to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy, an effect seen only when the chemotherapy was administered several days after the vascular targeting agent, but not if the order of administration was reversed. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence studies showed that the vasculature of 225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors was substantially depleted; the remaining vessels appeared more mature morphologically and displayed increased pericyte density and coverage. Tumor uptake and micro-distribution studies with radioactive and fluorescent small molecule drugs showed better accumulation and more homogenous distribution of the drugs within 225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors. These results show that 225Ac-E4G10 treatment leads to ablation and improvement of the tumor vascular architecture, and also demonstrate that the resulting vascular remodeling can increase tumor delivery of small molecules, thus providing a process for the improved outcomes observed after combining anti-vascular and chemotherapy. This study directly shows evidence for what has long been a speculated mechanism for anti-angiogenic therapies. Moreover, targeting the vessel for killing provides an alternative mode of improving chemotherapy delivery and efficacy, potentially avoiding some of the drawbacks of targeting a highly redundant angiogenic pathway.

Keywords: cancer, radiotherapy, anti-vascular therapy, angiogenesis


Therapies focusing on the tumor vasculature are an important part in the management of late stage malignancies. Several drugs that target the VEGF pathway have been approved and are in clinical use, while others are in different stages of clinical development. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, is routinely used in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment for metastatic colon, non-small cell lung and breast cancers. The multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, sorafenib and sunitinib, that target, among others, the VEGF-receptor 2, are approved as single agents in the treatment of renal cell carcinomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and hepatocellular carcinomas. As tumor angiogenesis is a process necessary for tumor growth, interference with VEGF signaling could produce strategies that are broadly effective. Moreover, since VEGF affects the host endothelium and not tumor cells, development of resistance against these drugs should be less likely. Unfortunately, in preclinical models and in several clinical trials with potent VEGF inhibitors, many tumors failed to respond. Furthermore, even tumors initially responsive to anti-VEGF/VEGFR2 therapy finally acquire resistance to the treatment, and relapse occurs in virtually all patients(13). Thus, while anti-angiogenic therapy has proven to be a valuable tool in cancer treatment, there is a need for alternative strategies to target the tumor vasculature; in addition, the mechanisms of action for anti-angiogenic therapy in combination with chemotherapy are poorly understood.

Vascular endothelial (VE) cadherin is an endothelial cell specific protein that is expressed constitutively throughout the vasculature and participates in the formation of adherens junctions between adjacent endothelial cells. The monoclonal antibody E4G10 specifically binds to a cryptic epitope exposed only on the monomeric terminal domain of the unengaged form of VE-Cadherin, found in neovasculature, and not on the dimeric form, which is present in mature endothelium(4). We looked to exploit this specificity to investigate the effects of neovascular ablation in tumors by conjugating E4G10 to Actinium-225, an alpha-particle emitting isotope generator. Alpha-particles exhibit high linear energy transfer and deposit large amounts energy (5–8 meV) over a pathlength of cellular dimensions (~60–80 μm)(5). These properties confer alpha-particles with the potential to kill individual cells with just one nuclear hit, thus reducing the chance of developing resistance, while specifically destroying targeted cells and limiting bystander cell toxicity(6).

We previously reported the design and use of a neo-vascular VE-Cadherin-targeted alpha-particle immunotherapeutic agent that was effective with paclitaxel chemotherapy in a prostate cancer model when used in combination, similar to the reported effects of anti-angiogenic drugs (7, 8). Unlike other anti-angiogenic or anti-vascular strategies 225Ac-E4G10 does not target a tumor specific pathway that can be circumvented by other angiogenic pathways; rather, it directly kills the new endothelial cells (7, 9). These properties make 225Ac-E4G10-based therapies an interesting alternative to other anti-angiogenic or anti-vascular strategies. In addition, the highly selective nature of the direct killing of the vessels, due to the short range of the alpha-particle, allows us to isolate the effects of the therapy on the tumor endothelial cells alone without significant tumor cell killing.

The mechanism by which anti-angiogenic therapies make chemotherapy more effective remains controversial. One theory explaining the additive effects of anti-angiogenic therapy and chemotherapy is “vessel normalization”: morphologic improvements and maturational changes are induced by the therapy in residual tumor vessels, which are initially tortuous, dilated, leaky and associated with erratic blood flow, hypoxia and increased interstitial pressure. Normalization of the tumor vessels, with reduced interstitial pressure and hypoxia, would enhance delivery and efficacy of subsequent cytotoxic agents, such as chemotherapeutic drugs, explaining improved outcomes observed in preclinical and clinical trials (10, 11). However, there is little experimental evidence that anti-angiogenic therapy improves drug delivery and alternative models have been suggested. For example, tumor cell repopulation, which would occur after chemotherapy ceases, might be mitigated by angiogenesis inhibition during the chemotherapy-free period (12, 13). Another mechanism, which may be consistent with vessel normalization, suggests that anti-vascular or VEGF-inhibition therapies may prevent endothelial progenitor cells from infiltrating the tumor and providing the vascular network necessary for further tumor growth (9). While the preclinical and clinical observations strongly support treating cancers with anti-angiogenic or anti-vascular therapy in conjunction with chemotherapy regimens, optimization of their efficacy will require a better understanding of why these combinations are additive(14).

Here, we report, in a human colon cancer xenograft model, that treatment with 225Ac-E4G10 results in reduced tumor burden, tumor vasculature remodeling, and improved tumor uptake of three different small molecule agents, as well as enhanced therapeutic response to chemotherapy. These data provide a rational pharmacokinetic mechanism to explain the benefits of combining anti-vascular therapy with chemotherapy, in a schedule dependent manner—something that has long been speculated as the mechanism of anti-angiogenic agents, but has yet to be shown directly.

Materials and Methods


Female athymic nude mice (NCr nu/nu), 4–12 weeks of age were obtained from Taconic, Germantown, NY. Animal studies were conducted according to the NIH Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Preparation, quality control and administration of Radioimmunoconjugates

225Actinium (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN or Curative, Inc. Seattle) was conjugated to E4G10 using a two-step labeling method as described(8). Routine quality control of the labeled antibody was performed using instant thin layer chromatography to estimate the radio-purity and cell binding assays were done to determine immunoreactivity. Mice were anesthetized with isofluorane and injected intravenously (in retro-orbital venous plexus) with the radioimmunoconjugate. The injected volume was 100 μL and the antibody dose was 0.3–0.5 μg per 60 nCi injection. Typical radiochemical purity was 96–99%.

Tumor implantation in mice

LS174T cells were obtained from MSKCC stocks. Cells were grown in DME media supplemented with glucose, non-essential amino acids, L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and air at 37 °C. Cells were harvested and approximately 3 million cells were injected in 100 μL of matrigel (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA) into the right flank of each animal.

Tumor Therapy Studies

Randomized control therapy studies with 225Ac-E4G10

Cohorts of 8–10 tumor-bearing animals were treated with either saline, unlabeled E4G10 mAb (10 μg) or 225Ac-E4G10 mAb (60 nCi, ~0.4 μg). Treatments were administered intravenously on days 5, 7, 9 post-implantation with 3 million LS174T cells, however, unlabeled E4G10 (10μg) was given as a single bolus dose administered at day 5 post-tumor implantation. In other studies, 225Ac-E4G10 treated animals were compared with 225Ac-IgG2a isotype control. Tumor size was measured with calipers, and tumor volume was calculated by the formula 0.52× d12× d2, where d1 is the smaller diameter and d2 is the larger diameter. Day 5 post-implantation of tumor was selected as the first day of treatment because it is the day during which new vessels first clearly appear, as determined in previous histological studies. Mice were sacrificed when tumor size was >2500 mm3.

Controlled, Drug Sequence Trials

Mice were implanted with 3 million LS174T cells on day 0. Each cohort of 8–10 mice then received two different treatments in a specified sequence. Saline, chemotherapy (1.8 mg Leucovorin (LV, Teva Parenteral Medicines, Irvine, CA)+ 0.6mg 5-Fluorouracil (Abraxis Pharmacetuical Products, Schaumberg, IL); intraperitoneally), or 225Ac-labeled E4G10 (60nCi, on ~0.5 μg antibody, i.v.) were administered at days 5, 7, 9 (first round of therapy) and days 15, 17, 19 (second round of therapy) post-tumor implantation as indicated in the groups. Since this model system was designed specifically to look at the effects of the drugs on neovasculature, not necessarily to achieve the maximum tolerated effects on tumor growth, doses were selected to cause ~50% reduction in tumor growth rate relative to saline treatment as determined in pilot experiments to allow differentiation between effects of the first round of treatments from the second. Three distinct treatment groups were randomized to: (1) Saline followed by saline, (2) LV/5-FU followed by 225Ac-E4G10, and (3) 225Ac-E4G10 followed by LV/5-Fu. Tumor dimensions were measured and tumor volume was calculated. Animals were followed for up to 111 days post tumor implantation for survival (statistics determined with Log-Rank/Mantel-Cox Text).

Histopathologic Studies

A fraction of the mice (n=3 per group) from the aforementioned treatment groups were sacrificed at day 15 post-implantation of tumor, and tumors were either cryofixed (OCT Tissue-Tek; SAKURA Finetek U.S.A. Inc) or fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and paraffin embedded for histopathological study. Vascular density was determined in tissue sections were stained for Pan ECA (pan endothelial cell antigen, Ab-Clone Meca 32, Dako); immunofluorescent staining for collagen IV, a major component of vascular basement membrane, assessed the basement membrane of vessels and helped differentiate between vascular ablation and inhibition of angiogenesis; staining for both alpha-SMA and NG2, both markers of pericytes, was performed to quantitate pericyte density and coverage of tumor vasculature. All quantification was done after scanning whole stained tumor sections, three per sample. Epifluorescence or bright field scanning was performed on a Zeiss Mirax Scan system using a 40× lens (Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Jena, Germany). Positive stained areas in the obtained high-resolution images were quantified using ImageJ ( Quantification results were analyzed with Prism software (Version 5.0, GraphPad software La Jolla, CA) for statistical significance using t-test (unpaired, two-tailed). In addition 2D and 3D images were acquired by laser confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP2, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) or bright field microscopy (Zeiss Axiovert 200M) of selected fields from the same sections to illustrate quantifications results.

Preparation of 111In-DTPA

Vascular penetration and drug diffusion into tumors was assessed using the radiolabeled construct 111In-DTPA, which was prepared by adding a mixture of 1.01 mCi of acidic 111In chloride (MDS Nordion, Vancouver, Canada) and 3M ammonium acetate (Aldrich) in 0.020 mL to 0.080 mL of a 50 mM solution of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) solution at 20°C for 60 min, tested for purity by ITLC (Gelman Science Inc., Ann Arbor, MI); it was mixed with 1% human serum albumin (HSA) (Swiss Red Cross, Bern, Switzerland) and 0.9% NaCl (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL)) to achieve 0.097 Ci/L the day of injection.

Biodistribution, permeability, and accumulation of small molecules into tumors

Tumor-bearing animals (n=8 per group) were anesthetized with isofluorane and injected with 111In-DTPA (5 μCi) retroorbitally and sacrificed after 5 minutes or 60 minutes, to evaluate 111In-DTPA vascular space and tissue space, respectively. Animals were also injected with Hoechst 33342 dye for high-resolution fluorscence perfusion studies 20 minutes prior to sacrifice. The %ID/g of indium-111 in tissues was determined after sacrifice analyzed with Prism software (Version 5.0, GraphPad software La Jolla, CA) for statistical significance using t-test (unpaired, two-tailed).


Tumor samples from mice injected (n=6 per group) with 111IN-DTPA 60 minutes earlier were collected, cryofixed (OCT Tissue-Tek; SAKURA Finetek U.S.A. Inc.) and cut with a cryostatic microtome (HM 500 M; Microm GmbH) to 30 μm sections. After air dryimg, the slide-mounted sections were covered with a sheet of 5-μm-thick mylar and pressed against a phosphor screen (type BI) in a light-tight cassette and the screen was exposed for 3 days. The screen was then scanned in a Molecular Imager System (model GS-363; Bio-Rad Laboratories) using a laser scanner at a spatial resolution of 100 μm. For image analysis, ImageJ was used to convert grayscale images into 8-bit binary images and number of positive pixels per mm2 were determined.

Statistical Analyses

Graphs were constructed using Prism (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Statistical comparisons between the experimental groups were by student's t-test (unpaired, two-tailed), or Log-Rank/Mantel-Cox Test depending on the analysis.


Pretreatment with 225Ac-E4G10 enhances subsequent chemotherapy effects

The LS174T human colon adenocarcinoma xenograft model was selected because it has been extensively used to investigate therapeutic effects on the tumor vasculature (1518). Based on earlier pilot studies, the treatment dose of 225Ac-E4G10 was chosen to cause ~50% reduction in tumor size (from saline treatment) and allow us to determine the effects of subsequent treatments. LS174T engrafted mice treated with 225Ac-E4G10 (60nCi, ~0.5 μg/mice/dose on days 5,7,9) showed significant reduction of tumor growth compared to saline, unlabeled E4G10 (10 μg), and, in a separate experiment, 225Ac-IgG2a (isotype control mAb) (Fig. 1A, 1B). This indicated that the anti-tumor effect was caused by directed alpha particle damage to VE-cadherin-positive endothelium and not by binding of the unlabeled antibody alone to VE-Cadherin or by a non-specific effect of the alpha-radiation within the vessel lumen or in extravascular tissues(19). The standard management of colorectal cancers includes regimens based on 5-FU, a thymidylate synthase inhibitor, and co-administration of LV. As with 225Ac-E4G10, pilot experiments were performed to determine LV/5-FU dosage, which suppresses tumor growth by 50% to ensure the effect of second agent would be discernable (Fig. S1A).

Figure 1
225Ac-E4G10 reduces LS174T xenograft tumor growth rate as monotherapy and improves efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy

Next, we studied the therapeutic efficacy of combining 225Ac-E4G10 with the standard chemotherapy and specifically asked whether the sequence of administration of the two drugs was important in outcome. First, LS174T engrafted animals received saline, 225Ac-E4G10 or LV/5-FU in on days 5, 7 and 9 post tumor implantation, after tumors were fully established and vascularized. Mice that received active treatments (225Ac-E4G10 or LV/5-FU) showed similar reduction of tumor growth when compared saline injected controls for the first 15 days following tumor implantation, as expected based on the dose selection of both drugs (Fig. 1C). On days 15, 17 and 19 post tumor-implantation, animals received a second round of treatment of the other drug. Animals treated with saline in the first round exhibited rapid tumor growth and 4/9 animals had reached the survival endpoint (tumor volume >2500 mm3) by day 15 (Fig. 1C). Remaining animals in this group were followed to determine median survival, which was 22 days (Fig. S1B). The rapidity with which animals in the saline-only pretreatment group reached survival endpoints precluded the study of the effect of an active agent only in the second round for these animals.

Animals treated with chemotherapy in the first treatment round followed by 225Ac-E4G10 exhibited continued tumor growth and a median survival of about 26 days, which was not significantly different from the saline control group (p=0.24). In contrast, animals first treated with 225Ac-E4G10 and then treated with chemotherapy showed little additional tumor growth during this time period compared to the inverse treatment (p=0.03)(Fig. 1C, D). Animals in the group that received 225Ac-E4G10 followed by LV/5-FU regimens had a median survival of 41.5 days which was significantly higher than LV/5-FU followed by 225Ac-E4G10 (p=0.019, Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test). These data confirmed that the drug combination alone did not enhanced survival, but rather, it was the sequence of administration that was important for treatment efficacy. These results led to the hypothesis that our anti-vascular therapy was specifically affecting the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy.

225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors show normalized, less abundant vessels and increased pericyte number and density

To further understand the mechanism for the effects of 225Ac-E4G10 pre-treatment on the efficacy of subsequent LV/5-FU, we studied the morphological changes in the tumor vasculature caused by 225Ac-E4G10 on day 15 post-tumor implantation—the day when the second treatment round was started. 225Ac-E4G10 showed significantly lower endothelial cell counts, as visualized by staining for Pan ECA (pan endothelial cell antigen, Ab-Clone Meca 32), when compared with control and LV/5-FU treated tumors (Fig. 2A–C). In addition, tumors treated with saline or chemotherapy showed collagen IV staining associated with endothelial cells, however, 225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors showed tube-shaped collagen IV structures similar to those observed in the controls, that were not associated with endothelial cells (Fig. 2D–F). These collagen IV ghost structures often are still filled with blood cells and are indicative of a selective endothelial killing by 225Ac-E4G10(20). Quantification of tumor sections showed significantly more collagen sleeves with 225Ac-E4G10 treatment (Fig. 2G). Vessels of tumors treated with 225Ac-E4G10 are not only less abundant, but also smaller, consistent with previous data (Fig. 2H). Additionally, tumor tissue staining with E4G10 mAb to probe for the unengaged VE-Cadherin on neovascular cells showed significantly less immunoreactivity in 225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors when compared to control (p=0.01) and chemotherapy treated tumors (p<0.01).

Figure 2
225Ac-E4G10 treatment depletes vasculature. Remaining vessels are smaller in diameter

Quantification of pericytes by staining for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) was performed on tumor samples. Marked pericyte staining was observed after tumors were treated with 225Ac-E4G10, while controls showed very low pericyte abundance (Fig. 3A, B). As endothelial cells were depleted (Fig. 3C), and pericyte counts were increased 225Ac-E4G10 treatment clearly results in significantly more pericytes per vessel area (α-SMA versus Meca32)(Fig. 3D). Thus, pericytes may have infiltrated or proliferated within tumors in the 225Ac-E4G10 group, and remaining blood vessels were more often supported by pericytes when compared to controls (Fig. 3E). These experiments were repeated with the pericyte marker NG2, which is selective for a broader subset of pericytes than alpha-SMA. Results with NG2 confirmed that 225Ac-E4G10-treatment not only resulted in a selective depletion of immature blood vessels, which lacked pericyte coverage, leaving only mature pericyte-covered vessels, but also promoted the recruitment of pericytes (Fig. 3F).

Figure 3
225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors show more pericytes adjacent to endothelial cells

Apoptosis, as measured by cleaved-caspase 3 staining, was also significantly higher in 225Ac-E4G10-treated tumors (Fig. S2A). Hypoxia evaluated by staining for carbonic anhydrase IX, which is upregulated by hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1-alpha), was not significantly affected by our treatment(21) (Fig. S2B). Of note, LS174T tumors exhibited a much higher level of CAIX staining that other tumor sections we have previously encountered (data not shown), and these results may be a consequence of a high baseline hypoxia in control treated animals such that more minor perturbations in hypoxia with 225Ac-E4G10, if any, would be masked.

Pretreatment with 225Ac-E4G10 enhances tumor accumulation of 111In-DTPA, Hoechst 33342, and [18F]-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine

Histological evaluation clearly indicated more mature tumor vasculature after treatment with 225Ac-E4G10. However, the mechanism by which this effect leads to increased chemotherapy efficacy was unknown; therefore, we decided to test if the vessel remodeling also resulted in an improved delivery of small molecule drugs into the tumor. Biodistribution studies were performed using DTPA-chelated 111Indium, a freely diffusible small molecule tracer(22). 60 minutes after administration of 111In-DTPA, there was a significant (p=0.01) increase in total 111In accumulation (%ID/g) in tumors treated with 225Ac-E4G10 (Fig. 4A). This effect is more apparent when tumor signal is normalized to blood signal (Fig. 4B). Biodistribution studies performed 5 minutes after administration of 111In-DTPA showed no difference in tumor accumulation between 225Ac-E4G10 and 225Ac-IgG2a isotype control (Fig. S3A). 111In activity in other organs was also assessed at both time points and no consistent treatment-dependent changes in uptake were observed.

Figure 4
225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors accumulate more 111In-DTPA than 225Ac-IgG2a treated tumors

Autoradiograms of the mice examined 60 minutes post injection showed more tumors with high activity in the 225Ac-E4G10 treatment group when compared to 225Ac-IgG2a controls (Fig. 4C). To measure homogeneity of signal distribution, the percent positive areas per tumor were evaluated and 5/6 (83%) of 225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors had more than 50% positive areas, whereas only 2/6 (33%) of animals treated with 225Ac-IgG2a showed greater than 50% positive area. We corroborated these results further by evaluating the distribution of another small molecule, Hoechst 33342, in 225Ac-E4G10-treated and untreated tumors. Hoechst 33342, which is fluorescent and can be detected after intercalation into DNA, was injected i.v. into tumor-bearing animals 20 min prior to euthanasia and tissue sections were scanned. Evaluation of the fluorescence signal by epifluorescence or laser assisted confocal microscopy yields the in-tissue distribution, and serves as a marker of perfusion. The area percentage positive for Hoechst 33342 significantly (p<0.05) increased after 225Ac-E4G10 treatment and tumors also showed a more homogenous perfusion (Fig. 4D).

We also evaluated tumor accumulation and penetration in experimental groups using [18F]-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine (18FLT) a PET-radiotracer analog of 5-FU for biodistribution studies. Ten days after pre-treatment with 225Ac-E4G10 started (day 15 post tumor implantation), the accumulation of 18FLT in the tumor tissue was significantly enhanced when compared to 225Ac-IgG2a isotype treatment (p<0.003), suggesting a similar effect for 5-FU and explaining the increased efficacy of the treatment (Fig. S3B). Other tissues showed no consistent differences in 18FLT uptake across treatments.


We show that directed, vascular killing of tumor neovascular endothelium by use of short-range (~60–80 μm) cytotoxic alpha particles is an effective treatment modality that enhances subsequent chemotherapeutic efficacy. We describe a mechanism whereby 225Ac-E4G10 induces vessel remodeling and leads to improved penetration of subsequently administered small molecules. A number of studies have shown the additive effects of anti-angiogenic compounds and chemotherapy in preclinical and clinical trials; however, the mechanisms to explain the results were unclear and controversial (10, 14). The data here suggest that the order of administration of the two types of agents, anti-vasculature and anti-tumor, is critical to successful outcomes and may have an important impact on the design of combination therapies for clinical trials.

Anti-angiogenic agents, including anti-VEGF or anti-VEGFR mAbs, have been studied extensively preclinically and bevacizumab has been successful when combined with chemotherapy. One mechanism that explains the additive effects observed with bevacizumab and chemotherapy is vascular normalization with remodeling caused by anti-angiogenic therapy, leading to improved drug accumulation. In mice, treatment with DC101, an anti-VEGF receptor-2 mAb, increased pericyte coverage, reduced microvessel density, reduced interstitial pressure and improved oxygenation, however, these studies stopped short of proving enhancements in drug accumulation (10). Improved accumulation of TRITC-labeled albumin has also been demonstrated after bevacizumab, suggesting improved perfusion, and increased accumulation of subsequent topotecan has been reported by Dickson et al. in neuroblastoma xenografts in mice (10, 14). However, the use of bevacizumab in mouse models is problematic as the antibody does not bind or neutralize murine VEGF-A (23). While bevacizumab can effectively block VEGF derived from the implanted human tumor cells, it has been previously demonstrated that host-derived VEGF significantly contributes in a model-dependent manner, to the angiogenic process(24). Thus, while improved drug accumulation or uptake in tumors has been speculated as a mechanism for anti-angiogenic therapies, little direct pharmacokinetic evidence for this phenomenon exists.

In contrast to anti-angiogenic agents, 225Ac-E4G10 is a cytotoxic, vascular targeting agent that selectively binds to the neo-vasculature of tumors, depleting the endothelial cells within tumors, as well as their progenitors in the blood and bone marrow, but not the tumor cells themselves(9). Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been shown to play a role in vasculogenesis within tumors, and vascular depletion, as well as the anti-tumor effects observed in our study, could be a result of specific killing of both endothelial cells within tumors and killing of EPCs. The relative contribution of the EPC population is an interesting question for future studies.

The specificity of E4G10 to the neovasculature allowed us to isolate the effects of anti-vessel therapy from other anti-tumor effects in our study, but may not, consequently, generalize to all anti-angiogenic therapies. However, like anti-VEGF therapies, 225Ac-E4G10 treatment also results in phenotypic vascular normalization without targeting a highly redundant angiogenic pathway. Thus 225Ac-E4G10 treatment has the potential to avoid some of the pitfalls observed with classical anti-VEGF pathway therapeutic drugs. However, further experiments are necessary to determine whether 225Ac-E4G10 treatment might be a second line alternative for anti-VEGF-resistant tumors.

Unlabeled E4G10 at >4000 times the dose of 225Ac-E4G10 used here has some anti-tumor effect, but it did not at 10 times the dose we used (shown in control groups)(19). In addition, alpha emitters on non-specific mAb were ineffective. These data show that 225Ac-E4G10 was not operating by binding to, or blocking VE-Cadherin, but by delivering the alpha-emitter selectively to kill the targeted endothelial cells.

The importance of sequence of administration was evident when animals treated first with 225Ac-E4G10 and then with LV/5-FU chemotherapy exhibited both decreased tumor burden and improved median survival as compared to animals receiving the inverse drug schedule. Histological examination of 225Ac-E4G10-treated tumors showed smaller, less densely dispersed vessels. Additionally, vascular basement membrane (collagen IV) structures were present in the absence of endothelial cells with 225Ac-E4G10 treatment, while control and chemotherapy treated tumors showed endothelial cells adjacent to the collagen scaffold, confirming that our treatment ablates endothelial cells(20). These collagen IV structures have been implicated in the tumor revascularization that occurs once anti-angiogenic therapy is ceased by serving as a scaffold for the neo-endothelium(25). Apoptosis was also higher in 225Ac-E4G10 treated tumors, which could be a combination of endothelial cell death, tumor cell death as a consequence of endothelial cell death, or direct tumor cell killing, which might be expected given that the alpha-particle pathlength is several cell diameters(~60–80 m); the gross differences in tumor volume may be a consequence tumor cell death resulting from any of these phenomena.

Pericytes are known to contribute to the integrity of mature vessels, and when absent result in abnormal function and leakiness(26). Morphologically, 225Ac-E4G10-treated tumors showed significantly more pericytes surrounding smaller, less dilated vessels and higher pericyte coverage (pericytes per vessel) when compared to saline and LV/5-FU treatment. Interestingly, 225Ac-E4G10-treated tumors showed a higher total number of pericytes adjacent to vessels, suggesting proliferation of intra-tumoral pericytes or recruitment of pericytes, rather than simply a product of immature vessel ablation. These histological results are consistent with what occurs during vascular normalization by anti-VEGF therapy.

Previous studies demonstrated that anti-angiogenic therapies have resulted in decreases in intratumor pressure, improved vessel function with decreased vascular leakiness, yet few have determined if there is improved penetration of the chemotherapy into the tumor upon vessel normalization(10, 27, 28). Our findings show a novel and specific method for achieving vessel improvements in tumors. Furthermore, accumulation and homogeneity of tumor distribution of 111In-DTPA by ex vivo tissue harvest and autoradiographic analysis, and of Hoechst 33342 dye by immunofluoresence, were all improved in 225Ac-E4G10 treated animals.

18FLT also entered tumors more effectively as measured by positron imaging and ex vivo tissue harvest in 225Ac-E4G10 treated animals than control. As 18FLT is metabolized by intracellular thymidine kinase, the total signal in tumors after treatment could be an amalgam of increased accumulation driven by 225Ac-E4G10–induced remodeling of tumor vasculature and increased metabolic activity in the tumors. If there is increased metabolic activity, this further supports the selectivity of the 225Ac-E4G10 for the vessel and not the tumor.

Since our drug results in vascular remodeling, improved perfusion, and improved small molecule drug accumulation within tumors, one might expect 225Ac-E4G10 to cause a decrease in hypoxia as well. However, hypoxia levels of tumor sections by CAIX staining, were not significantly altered between treatments. Typically, we have found LS174T tumors to exhibit a much higher level of CAIX staining (at least 4 times more) than tumor sections derived from other cell lines that we have previously encountered (data not shown), and CAIX staining results may be a consequence of a high hypoxia baseline in these tumors such that more minor perturbations in hypoxia with 225Ac-E4G10 would be masked if present. In addition, while anti-angiogenic treatment with inhibitors of the VEGF-pathway is hypothesized to cause vascular normalization and at least in one previously discussed setting improved drug uptake (14), it is also frequently reported to actually increase hypoxia both in patients and in model systems (2932). This observation is often cited as a reason for the failure of these therapies and development of resistance and a more aggressive phenotype (33, 34). Our findings combined with results in the literature suggest that the effects of vascular changes on oxygen and drug transport can sometimes be decoupled. Given these differing data, it appears that our anti-vascular approach mimics certain effects on the vasculature previously observed with anti-angiogenic therapies—normalized vasculature and improved perfusion—while exhibiting no detectable effects on hypoxia.

In conclusion, 225Ac-E4G10 treatment potently killed neovascular endothelial cells, remodeled tumor vasculature without directly targeting an angiogenic signaling pathway, and improved the pharmacokinetics of subsequently administered small molecules in tumors, thus providing a mechanism for the improved therapeutic efficacy of combinations with chemotherapy. These observations also highlight the importance of therapeutic scheduling when employing agents targeting tumor vasculature.

Supplementary Material


This work was supported by NIH R01, CA55349, CA 33049, DOE DE-SC0002456, NIH MSTP GM07739, Lymphoma Foundation, Glades and Tudor Foundations and the Experimental Therapeutics Center. We also thank ImClone Systems for providing E4G10 mAb, and MSKCC small animal imaging core.


1. Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2039–49. [PubMed]
2. Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, et al. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2666–76. [PubMed]
3. Bergers G, Hanahan D. Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:592–603. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. May C, Doody JF, Abdullah R, et al. Identification of a transiently exposed VE-cadherin epitope that allows for specific targeting of an antibody to the tumor neovasculature. Blood. 2005;105:4337–44. [PubMed]
5. Brechbiel MW. Targeted alpha-therapy: past, present, future? Dalton Trans. 2007:4918–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Goodhead DT. Mechanisms for the biological effectiveness of high-LET radiations. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 1999;40(Suppl):1–13. [PubMed]
7. Singh Jaggi J, Henke E, Seshan SV, et al. Selective alpha-particle mediated depletion of tumor vasculature with vascular normalization. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e267. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. McDevitt MR, Ma D, Lai LT, et al. Tumor therapy with targeted atomic nanogenerators. Science. 2001;294:1537–40. [PubMed]
9. Nolan DJ, Ciarrocchi A, Mellick AS, et al. Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells are a major determinant of nascent tumor neovascularization. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1546–58. [PubMed]
10. Tong RT, Boucher Y, Kozin SV, Winkler F, Hicklin DJ, Jain RK. Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3731–6. [PubMed]
11. Fukumura D, Jain RK. Tumor microenvironment abnormalities: causes, consequences, and strategies to normalize. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101:937–49. [PubMed]
12. Shaked Y, Henke E, Roodhart JM, et al. Rapid chemotherapy-induced acute endothelial progenitor cell mobilization: implications for antiangiogenic drugs as chemosensitizing agents. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:263–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Shaked Y, Kerbel RS. Antiangiogenic strategies on defense: on the possibility of blocking rebounds by the tumor vasculature after chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7055–8. [PubMed]
14. Dickson PV, Hamner JB, Sims TL, et al. Bevacizumab-induced transient remodeling of the vasculature in neuroblastoma xenografts results in improved delivery and efficacy of systemically administered chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3942–50. [PubMed]
15. Boucher Y, Leunig M, Jain RK. Tumor angiogenesis and interstitial hypertension. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4264–6. [PubMed]
16. Yuan F, Chen Y, Dellian M, Safabakhsh N, Ferrara N, Jain RK. Time-dependent vascular regression and permeability changes in established human tumor xenografts induced by an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14765–70. [PubMed]
17. Dang DT, Chun SY, Burkitt K, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 target genes as indicators of tumor vessel response to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1872–80. [PubMed]
18. Patan S, Tanda S, Roberge S, Jones RC, Jain RK, Munn LL. Vascular morphogenesis and remodeling in a human tumor xenograft: blood vessel formation and growth after ovariectomy and tumor implantation. Circ Res. 2001;89:732–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Lamszus K, Brockmann MA, Eckerich C, et al. Inhibition of glioblastoma angiogenesis and invasion by combined treatments directed against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, epidermal growth factor receptor, and vascular endothelial-cadherin. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:4934–40. [PubMed]
20. Inai T, Mancuso M, Hashizume H, et al. Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Signaling in Cancer Causes Loss of Endothelial Fenestrations, Regression of Tumor Vessels, and Appearance of Basement Membrane Ghosts. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:35–52. [PubMed]
21. Loncaster JA, Harris AL, Davidson SE, et al. Carbonic Anhydrase (CA IX) Expression, a Potential New Intrinsic Marker of Hypoxia: Correlations with Tumor Oxygen Measurements and Prognosis in Locally Advanced Carcinoma of the Cervix. Cancer Res. 2001;61:6394–9. [PubMed]
22. Miyagawa T, Oku T, Sasajima T, et al. Assessment of treatment response by autoradiography with (14)C-aminocyclopentane carboxylic acid, (67)Ga-DTPA, and (18)F-FDG in a herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir brain tumor model. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1845–54. [PubMed]
23. Yu L, Wu X, Cheng Z, et al. Interaction between Bevacizumab and Murine VEGF-A: A Reassessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:522–7. [PubMed]
24. Lee S, Chen TT, Barber CL, et al. Autocrine VEGF Signaling Is Required for Vascular Homeostasis. Cell. 2007;130:691–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Mancuso MR, Davis R, Norberg SM, et al. Rapid vascular regrowth in tumors after reversal of VEGF inhibition. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2006;116:2610–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Ozerdem U, Stallcup WB. Early contribution of pericytes to angiogenic sprouting and tube formation. Angiogenesis. 2003;6:241–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Jain RK. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science. 2005;307:58–62. [PubMed]
28. Jain RK, Tong RT, Munn LL. Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2729–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Rieger J, Bahr O, Ronellenfitsch MW, Steinbach J, Hattingen E. Bevacizumab-Induced Diffusion Restriction in Patients With Glioma: Tumor Progression or Surrogate Marker of Hypoxia? J Clin Oncol [PubMed]
30. Huang J, Bae JO, Tsai JP, et al. Angiopoietin-1/Tie-2 activation contributes to vascular survival and tumor growth during VEGF blockade. Int J Oncol. 2009;34:79–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Riesterer O, Honer M, Jochum W, Oehler C, Ametamey S, Pruschy M. Ionizing radiation antagonizes tumor hypoxia induced by antiangiogenic treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3518–24. [PubMed]
32. Ansiaux R, Dewever J, Gregoire V, Feron O, Jordan BF, Gallez B. Decrease in tumor cell oxygen consumption after treatment with vandetanib (ZACTIMA; ZD6474) and its effect on response to radiotherapy. Radiat Res. 2009;172:584–91. [PubMed]
33. Yu JL, Rak JW, Coomber BL, Hicklin DJ, Kerbel RS. Effect of p53 Status on Tumor Response to Antiangiogenic Therapy. Science. 2002;295:1526–8. [PubMed]
34. Paez-Ribes M, Allen E, Hudock J, et al. Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:220–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]