PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2011 February 25; 286(8): 6128–6142.
Published online 2010 December 3. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M110.166991
PMCID: PMC3057817

Amino Acids Activate Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 (mTORC2) via PI3K/Akt Signaling*An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpg

Abstract

The activity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complexes regulates essential cellular processes, such as growth, proliferation, or survival. Nutrients such as amino acids are important regulators of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) activation, thus affecting cell growth, protein synthesis, and autophagy. Here, we show that amino acids may also activate mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2). This activation is mediated by the activity of class I PI3K and of Akt. Amino acids induced a rapid phosphorylation of Akt at Thr-308 and Ser-473. Whereas both phosphorylations were dependent on the presence of mTOR, only Akt phosphorylation at Ser-473 was dependent on the presence of rictor, a specific component of mTORC2. Kinase assays confirmed mTORC2 activation by amino acids. This signaling was functional, as demonstrated by the phosphorylation of Akt substrate FOXO3a. Interestingly, using different starvation conditions, amino acids can selectively activate mTORC1 or mTORC2. These findings identify a new signaling pathway used by amino acids underscoring the crucial importance of these nutrients in cell metabolism and offering new mechanistic insights.

Keywords: Akt PKB, Amino acid, Autophagy, mTOR, mTOR Complex (mTORC)

Introduction

Cell growth and proliferation are fundamental processes that are regulated by multiple signals, such as nutrients, hormones, and growth factors. One of the key components regulating these signal transduction pathways is mTOR,3 which in higher eukaryotes forms two different complexes: mTORC1 and mTORC2 (1, 2). mTOR complexes display Ser/Thr kinase activity. mTORC1 is rapamycin-sensitive and includes the mTOR catalytic subunit, mLST8/GβL, PRAS40, the regulatory-associated protein of mTOR (raptor), and DEPTOR (3,5). Instead, mTORC2 is rapamycin-insensitive, at least in short treatments (6), and includes mTOR, mLST8/GβL, mSin1, rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR (rictor), the protein observed with rictor (protor), and DEPTOR (4, 5, 7). mTORC1 regulates cell growth by controlling mRNA translation, ribosome biogenesis, autophagy, and metabolism (1, 8,12). On the other hand, mTORC2 regulates cell survival and proliferation (13,18). Both hormones and growth factors have been described to regulate mTORC1 and mTORC2 (1, 19, 20). However, thus far only mTORC1 has been described to be regulated by nutrients such as amino acids (1, 2, 20,22).

A number of studies point to the importance of nutrients in the etiology of some major diseases, such as insulin-resistant obesity (23) or cancer (24, 25) and in the aging process (11, 26). In humans, circulating amino acid levels are elevated in obese individuals, and this is related to an increase in insulin resistance (23, 27, 28). The morbidity of obesity not only extends to diabetes and cardiovascular diseases but also has been linked to 20% of cancer deaths (29). During the last years, different studies have shown a relationship between nutrients, such as glucose or amino acids, and mTOR signaling. For example, it has been reported that amino acids activate S6 kinase 1 protein (S6K1) and inhibit autophagy in an mTOR-dependent manner (30, 31). S6K1 activation involves its phosphorylation on multiple Ser/Thr amino acid residues, with the critical step being the phosphorylation at Thr-389 (3, 32,34). This phosphorylation is catalyzed by mTORC1, so there is a correlation between mTORC1 and S6K1 activation. Although the precise mechanism of mTORC1 activation by amino acids remains unclear, it appears to require the class III PI3K human vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 34 (hVps34), as well as the serine/threonine kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 3 (MAP4K3) and the Rag family of small GTPases (2, 28, 35,37). In turn, activation of hVps34 is mediated by Ca2+/calmodulin signaling (38). More recently, it has been demonstrated that amino acids may also activate S6K1 through MAPKs independently of mTOR (39).

Hormones and growth factors signal to both mTOR complexes. For instance, insulin binding to its receptor activates the canonical signaling cascade triggered by the activation of class I PI3K, leading to activation of Akt through its phosphorylation at Thr-308 and activation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes (2, 35, 36, 40, 41). Thus, Akt-dependent mTORC1 activation leads to S6K1 and 4EBP1 phosphorylation regulating cell growth and autophagy. On the other hand, mTORC2 activation regulates cell survival and proliferation by inducing further phosphorylation of its substrate Akt at Ser-473 (42), SGK1 phosphorylation (17, 18), and transcription regulation via Forkhead family transcription factor (FKHRL or FOXO) inhibition (14).

In the present study, we demonstrate that amino acids can also activate Akt signaling through class I PI3K, as insulin does. This new amino acid signaling pathway also leads to mTORC2 activation and phosphorylation of Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a. Furthermore, we show the conditions under which amino acids may differentially activate mTOR complexes 1 and 2. Altogether, these data shed new light into the mechanisms underlying amino acid signaling and their role in cellular growth, proliferation, and survival.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Reagents

Insulin, PDGF, wortmannin, rapamycin, betaine, γ-amino-n-butyric acid, protein A-peroxidase secondary antibody, ATP, anti-FLAG, anti-HA, and anti-P-ERK1/2 antibodies, hVps34 class III PI3K inhibitor 3-methyladenine (Sigma-Aldrich); amino acid solutions (minimal essential medium and minimal essential medium nonessential) (Invitrogen); l-glutamine solution (Biological Industries); U0126 and SB 203580 (Calbiochem); anti-mTOR, anti-rictor (53A2), anti-raptor (24C12), anti-P-T308-Akt, anti-P-S473-Akt, anti-Akt, anti-P-T37/46–4E-BP1, anti-P-T24-Fox01/T32-Fox03a, anti-P-T389-S6K1 (1A5), anti-P-T421/S424-S6K1, anti-P-S380-RSK, anti-P-S376-MSK, anti-P-S235/236-S6, anti-S6 (54D2), and anti-PT180/Y182-p38 antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology); anti-TSC2 (C-20) and anti-S6K1 (C-18) antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.); anti-LC3 antibody (MBL); horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen); protein A-Sepharose (GE Healthcare); Immobilon-P PVDF transfer membrane (Millipore Corporation); class I PI3K isoform-specific inhibitors (PI3Kβ-selective inhibitor TGX-155 (43), PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor IC87114 (44, 45), and PI3Kα-selective inhibitor AS702630 (46)) were kindly provided by M. Camps (Merck Serono); JNK inhibitor SP600125 (A. G. Scientific); and Akt Inhibitor VIII, Isozyme-Selective, Akti-1/2 (Calbiochem). pcDNA3-FLAG-HA-Akt1 was provided by Addgene (47). mTOR, rictor, and nontargeting control siRNAs were reported previously (16, 39).

Cell Culture and Transfection

HeLa, HEK293, and MCF7 cells were cultured at 37 °C in DMEM (Invitrogen) with 10% fetal bovine serum. Transfection of HeLa cells (plasmids and siRNAs) was carried out with calcium phosphate transfection system. Cell treatments such as serum starvation, amino acid deprivation, insulin, or amino acid stimulation were performed as reported previously (31, 36, 39, 48). For experiments with insulin, the cells were deprived of serum overnight and then incubated with 200 nm insulin for 30 min. For experiments with PDGF, the cells were deprived of serum overnight and then incubated with 50 ng/ml of PDGF for 30 min. For experiments with amino acids, after overnight serum deprivation, the cells were incubated for an additional 2 h with DPBS (Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 g/liter d-glucose and 36 mg/liter sodium pyruvate, calcium, and magnesium) (Invitrogen) (39), or, when noted, after overnight serum deprivation, the cells were incubated for an additional 2 h with DMEM without amino acids, DMEM(−AA) (36). The cells were then stimulated with amino acids (a mix of essential amino acids, nonessential amino acids, and l-glutamine solutions from Invitrogen and Biological Industries to 1× stock final concentration) for 30 min. For experiments with amino acid supplementation, the cells were cultured for 48 h in complete DMEM, without starvation. After this, the cells were supplemented with amino acids once. The specific inhibitors were added 60 min before the stimulation with amino acids or insulin at a final concentration of 20 nm rapamycin, 100 nm wortmannin, 5 μm U0126, 10 μm SB 203580, 10 μm Akti-1/2, 10 mm 3-methyladenine, 10 μm SP600125, and 1 μm for PI3K isoform-specific inhibitors.

Cell Lysate and Immunoblotting

Previously treated cells were lysed and processed as described previously (39). To simultaneously analyze big (e.g. mTOR) and small (e.g. LC3) proteins in the same SDS/PAGE gel, we used a gel combination named LAG gel (49). Band intensities were analyzed with a gel documentation system (LAS-3000 Fujifilm). Protein levels were normalized with respect to mTOR or TSC2 levels and expressed as percentages of controls.

Immunoprecipitations and Kinase Assay

Lysates from HeLa cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-mTOR, anti-rictor, or anti-raptor antibodies. Washed immunoprecipitates were used for in vitro kinase assays using previously purified FLAG-HA-Akt1 as substrate. All of the kinase assays were performed as described (17) with the following modifications: mTOR, rictor, and raptor immunoprecipitations were performed for 2 h, instead of 1 h, and the kinase assay for 40 min at 37 °C. FLAG-HA-Akt1 substrate purification was performed by immunoprecipitating FLAG-HA-Akt1 with anti-FLAG antibody for 1 h in HeLa cells previously starved of serum and amino acids. Band intensities were quantified with a gel documentation system (LAS-3000 Fujifilm).

Statistical Analysis

The results are expressed as the means ± S.E. Data for multiple variable comparisons were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. For comparison of significance, Dunn's test was used as a post hoc test according to the statistical program GraphPad Prism (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).

RESULTS

Amino Acids Induce Akt Phosphorylation at Thr-308

To analyze Akt activation by amino acids, HeLa cells were incubated overnight in DMEM without serum, followed by a 2-h incubation in Dulbecco's PBS (DPBS) to deprive them of amino acids, and after this, the cells were stimulated with amino acids for 30 min. Lysates of these cells were analyzed by immunoblot, and Akt activation was measured by detection of Thr-308 phosphorylation. Under these conditions, we observed Akt Thr-308 phosphorylation in the presence of amino acids (Fig. 1A). As a positive control of Akt activation, serum-deprived cells were stimulated with insulin. In fact, Akt Thr-308 phosphorylation levels obtained with amino acids were similar to the levels observed in the presence of insulin (Fig. 1A). We obtained the same result when we used different cell lines such as HEK293, MCF7, Huh7, C2C12, and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Fig. 1B and data not shown), indicating that Akt phosphorylation did not depend on the cell line studied. Time course experiments showed that Akt phosphorylation was rapid (1–5 min after the addition of amino acids) and reached maximum levels at 10–30 min (Fig. 1C). Similar to insulin, Akt phosphorylation by amino acids was dependent on wortmannin (inhibitor of PI3K activity) and independent of rapamycin (inhibitor of mTORC1 activity), U0126 (inhibitor of MEK activity), and SB 203580 (inhibitor of p38 activity) (Fig. 1D). Rapamycin and wortmannin were tested to different concentrations (10–100 and 10–200 nm, respectively) and times (30–120 min). Except for the lower wortmannin concentration, similar results were obtained (supplemental Fig. S1). These results indicate sufficient dosage and time duration of the treatment used with these inhibitors.

FIGURE 1.
Akt is phosphorylated at Thr-308 in response to amino acids. A–D, HeLa cells were deprived of serum overnight and stimulated with 200 nm insulin for 30 min, or after serum withdrawal, they were deprived for 2 h of amino acids (AA) with DPBS medium, ...

Amino Acids Induce Akt Phosphorylation at Ser-473

To analyze the Akt signaling induced by amino acids, we then checked substrates of mTORC complexes: phosphorylations of 4E-BP1 (Thr-37/Thr-46) and p70 S6K1 (Thr-389) for mTORC1 complex and phosphorylation of Akt (Ser-473) for mTORC2 complex. Stimulation by insulin was used as positive control of the activation of these complexes. Under these conditions, we observed phosphorylation of Akt at Ser-473 by amino acids to a similar extent to that obtained with insulin (Fig. 2A). We also observed phosphorylation of p70 S6K1 (Thr-421/Ser-424) and S6 ribosomal protein (Ser-235/Ser-236) by amino acids, as we described previously (39). As expected, insulin activated 4E-BP1 (Thr-37/Thr-46), p70 S6K1 (Thr-389), p70 S6K1 (Thr-421/Ser-424), and S6 ribosomal protein (Ser-235/Ser-236), in agreement with previous reports (1, 19, 28). However, we observed that amino acid addition did not result in 4E-BP1 (Thr-37/Thr-46) or p70 S6K1 (Thr-389) phosphorylation. Note that the band detected in the presence of amino acids with the anti-P-T389-S6K1 antibody (asterisk) is phosphorylated RSK/MSK (39). Akt phosphorylation at Ser-473 was also observed in other cell lines such as HEK293, MCF7, Huh7, C2C12, and mouse embryonic fibroblasts, indicating that Akt activation was not restricted to HeLa cells (Fig. 2B and data not shown). Time course experiments showed rapid phosphorylation of Akt at Ser-473 by amino acids (1–5 min), with maximum levels between 10 and 30 min. When we compared the activation course for Thr-308 and Ser-473 phosphorylation sites (Fig. 2C, right panel), we did not detect significant differences in their phosphorylation kinetics. To ascertain that the observed Akt activation on both Thr-308 and Ser-473 was not due to an osmotic effect and was instead a specific response to amino acids, we tested the effects of non-nutrient osmolytes betaine and γ-amino-n-butyric acid. Thr-308 and Ser-473 phosphorylations were only observed in the presence of amino acids, thus ruling out an osmotic effect (Fig. 2D). We had previously shown similar results for p70 S6K1 (Thr-421/Ser-424) and S6 (Ser-235/Ser-236) phosphorylations (39). In agreement with the results in Fig. 1D, Akt phosphorylation at Ser-473 by amino acids was only blocked in the presence of wortmannin (Fig. 2E). In insulin-induced cells, we observed a slight increase of Akt phosphorylation at Ser-473 in the presence of rapamycin (Fig. 2E), similar to what was observed for Akt phosphorylation at Thr-308 (Fig. 1D). This increase in Akt phosphorylations with insulin in the presence of rapamycin has previously been described as a result of mTORC1 inhibition (10, 50,53). We could not observe a similar increase in Akt phosphorylations with amino acids in the presence of rapamycin, suggesting different downstream substrates and pathway regulation for amino acid signaling. In Fig. 2E, we could also observe the different activation mechanisms, as reflected by different inhibitor sensitivities, for S6K1 (Thr-389 and Thr-421/Ser-424) and S6 (Ser-235/Ser-236) proteins in response to insulin or amino acids, as published previously (39). Rapamycin and wortmannin were also tested to different concentrations (10–100 and 10–200 nm, respectively) and times (30–120 min) (supplemental Fig. S1). Therefore, these results suggest a common activation mechanism for Akt in response to both insulin and amino acids (probably via PI3K pathway) and different activation mechanisms for S6K1 and S6 ribosomal protein: via Akt for the insulin-induced signal and via MAPK for the amino acid-induced signal.

FIGURE 2.
Amino acids induce Akt phosphorylation at Ser-473. HeLa (A–E), MCF7 (B), or HEK293 (B) cells were treated with insulin or amino acids (AA) as in Fig. 1. D, cells deprived of amino acids as in A were stimulated with amino acids (1×), betaine ...

Amino Acids Activate Akt via the α Isoform of Class I PI3K

To assess whether Akt phosphorylations occur downstream of PI3K, specific inhibitors for class I PI3K isoforms were tested (Fig. 3A). The inhibitors were PI3Kα-selective inhibitor AS702630 (46), PI3Kβ-selective inhibitor TGX-155 (43), and PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor IC87114 (44, 45). We observed a great inhibition, for both Thr-308 and Ser-473 phosphorylations, in the presence of the PI3Kα-selective inhibitor. We obtained the same results in response to both amino acids and insulin, reinforcing the notion that both of them signal through the same class I PI3K isoform. That p110α is essential for insulin signal transduction has been described previously (54). These experiments confirm the involvement of the α isoform of class I PI3K in the amino acids signal as well. We also analyzed the involvement of class III PI3K (hVps34) in amino acid signaling (Fig. 3B) using the hVps34 inhibitor 3-methyladenine. We did not observe inhibition of Akt phosphorylation with amino acids nor with insulin.

FIGURE 3.
Amino acids induce Akt phosphorylations via class I PI3K. HeLa cells were treated with insulin or amino acids as in Fig. 1. Cells were pretreated with 100 nm wortmannin (W), 1 μm class I PI3K isoform-specific inhibitors (α, β, ...

Amino Acids Signal to Akt Ser-473 through mTORC2

It has been described that mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt at Ser-473 downstream of PI3K, (16, 40, 42, 55, 56). We also showed that amino acids may activate Akt in the same way insulin does (Figs. 2E and and3).3). To test whether mTOR complexes mediate Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation induced by amino acids, we used an mTOR siRNA to knock down mTOR protein levels. HeLa cells were transfected with mTOR-specific siRNA and stimulated with amino acids. Stimulation with insulin was used as a positive control. Knockdown of mTOR clearly inhibited the amino acid-induced phosphorylations of Akt in Ser-473 (downstream of mTORC2) and in Thr-308 (upstream of mTORC2) (Fig. 4A). In insulin-induced cells, knockdown of mTOR only inhibited Ser-473 phosphorylation and not Thr-308. Moreover, mTOR knockdown did not affect phosphorylations of S6K1 (Thr-421/Ser-424) or S6 ribosomal protein (Ser-235/Ser-236) in response to amino acids, but S6K1 and S6 ribosomal protein activation was clearly inhibited in response to the insulin signal, as described previously (10, 42, 57). In agreement with the decrease of mTORC1 activity, activation of 4E-BP1 (Thr-37/Thr-46) was also abolished in insulin signaling.

FIGURE 4.
mTOR and rictor are required for the phosphorylation of Akt Ser-473 induced by amino acids. HeLa cells were transfected with either mTOR siRNA (A), rictor siRNA (B), or nontargeting (NT) control siRNA (A and B) 48 h before serum deprivation. Deprivation ...

To check whether the Akt activation was specific of mTORC2, we used a rictor siRNA (Fig. 4B). Knockdown of rictor completely abolished the amino acid-induced phosphorylation of Akt at Ser-473. Akt phosphorylation at Thr-308 was not inhibited. Rictor knockdown did not affect phosphorylations of S6K1 or S6 ribosomal protein in response to amino acids. Similar results were obtained by stimulating cells with insulin (Fig. 4B). In these conditions, knockdown of rictor did not affect the mTORC1 activation (phosphorylations of 4E-BP1 at Thr-37/Thr-46 and of p70 S6K1 at Thr-389) in response to insulin in agreement with the above data and previous reports (10, 42, 57).

To confirm the mTORC2 role in amino acid signal transduction to Akt, we performed in vitro kinase assays using FLAG-HA-Akt fusion protein as substrate. Lysates from HeLa cells stimulated or not with amino acids were immunoprecipitated with anti-mTOR antibodies. Purified immunoprecipitates were incubated with previously purified FLAG-HA-Akt in the presence or absence of Mg-ATP for 40 min. Under these conditions, phosphorylation of Akt at Ser-473 was significantly increased in mTOR immunoprecipitates stimulated by amino acids (Fig. 5A). The mTOR immunoprecipitates contained rictor and raptor (Fig. 5A). To assess which of the two mTOR complexes was involved in this phosphorylation, we performed immunoprecipitations from HeLa cell lysates using specific antibodies against mTORC1 (using anti-raptor antibodies) and mTORC2 (using anti-rictor antibodies). In the presence of Mg-ATP and FLAG-HA-Akt substrate, rictor immunoprecipitates stimulated by amino acids increased significantly the phosphorylation of Akt substrate at Ser-473 (Fig. 5C). In parallel experiments, raptor immunoprecipitates stimulated by amino acids failed to increase Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 5B). We could not detect Akt Thr-308 phosphorylation in kinase assays (Fig. 5), raptor in rictor immunoprecipitates (Fig. 5C), or rictor in raptor immunoprecipitates (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these data support the specific activation of Akt at Ser-473 by amino acids via mTORC2.

FIGURE 5.
Amino acids induce phosphorylation of Akt Ser-473 through mTORC2. HeLa cells were treated as in Fig. 1. Postnuclear supernatants (PNS) were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-mTOR (A), anti-raptor (B), or anti-rictor (C) antibodies. Immunocomplexes were ...

Amino Acids Inactivate FOXO3a Downstream of Akt and Independently of the JNK Activity

Akt has been described as a mediator of cell survival and proliferation in response to extracellular stimuli such as insulin or growth factors (14, 58,61). These signals suppress the death machinery and prevent apoptosis. Akt plays a central role in promoting cell survival by phosphorylating proapoptotic substrates and suppressing their function. One of these downstream substrates belongs to the Forkhead family of transcription factors: FKHRL or FOXO. The phosphorylations in Thr-24 of FOXO1 and Thr-32 of FOXO3a (and two other phosphorylation sites) result in exclusion of FOXO from the nucleus, which prevents transcription of its proapoptotic targets and thus promotes cell survival and proliferation (14, 62,64). These effects have been described with insulin and other growth factors. Because we have shown here that amino acids induce Akt phosphorylation and activation, it seems plausible that amino acids might also inactivate FOXO by inducing its phosphorylation in an Akt-dependent manner. To confirm this hypothesis, we checked FOXO phosphorylation. As shown in Fig. 6A, in HeLa cells stimulated with amino acids, we could observe Akt (Thr-308 and Ser-473) and FOXO3a (Thr-32) phosphorylations. To check the specificity of this phosphorylation, we used the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin and the Akt-specific inhibitor Akti-1/2 (65). Both of them blocked the Thr-32 phosphorylation of FOXO3a, confirming the downstream effect of Akt in the amino acid signal. The Akti-1/2 inhibitor confirmed that FOXO3a phosphorylation was due to Akt. We could also detect FOXO1 phosphorylation and the same inhibition profile with a longer exposure (data not shown). When using Akti-1/2 we observed, as expected, an inhibition of Akt phosphorylation at Ser-473 but also a marked inhibition of Akt phosphorylation at Thr-308. This may be due to the same feedback regulatory loop observed in Fig. 4A for the mTOR siRNA assay.

FIGURE 6.
Amino acids inactivate FOXO3a independently of JNK activity. HeLa cells were deprived of serum overnight and stimulated with 50 ng/ml PDGF for 30 min, or after serum withdrawal, they were deprived for 2 h of amino acids (AA) with DPBS medium, followed ...

Some previous studies suggest that Akt activation is achieved through a series of phosphorylation steps: first, Akt is phosphorylated at Thr-450 by JNK to prime its activation; then PDK1 phosphorylates Akt at Thr-308 to expose the Ser-473 residue; and finally, Akt is phosphorylated at Ser-473 by mTORC2 to achieve its full activation (66). To test whether Akt phosphorylation at Thr-450 is involved in the Akt activation by amino acids, we used the JNK inhibitor SP600125 (66). The Akt activation by amino acids (phosphorylations of Akt at Thr-308 and Ser-473, and phosphorylation of its substrate FOXO3a) was not modified in the presence of the JNK inhibitor (Fig. 6B). As positive control, HeLa cells were stimulated with PDGF in the presence or absence of the inhibitor. Under these conditions, Akt activation was JNK-dependent (Fig. 6B). These data suggest that the Akt activation by amino acids is JNK-independent.

Amino Acid Signaling Mechanisms Depend on Starvation Conditions

Several groups have reported different results about the activation of Akt, mTORC1, mTORC2, or S6K1 proteins in the presence of amino acids (Refs. 3, 22, 31, 36, 38, 39, 48, and 67,69 and data shown here). If we analyzed the experimental conditions used in these reports, we observed some differences: for example, the starvation media, the starvation time, the concentration of amino acids, the addition of insulin, or the previous preload with some amino acid. Although it is difficult to test and compare all of these conditions, we have tried to analyze some of them. Thus, to test whether some differences were due to different experimental conditions used to deprive cells from nutrients, we decided to compare the effects of two different starvation media upon subsequent amino acid-induced responses in HeLa and HEK293 cells. The two starvation media used after overnight serum deprivation were DPBS and DMEM(−AA). Under these conditions (Fig. 7A), in DPBS-starved HeLa cells amino acids induced the phosphorylation of Akt (Thr-308 and Ser-473), S6K1 (Thr-421/Ser-424), S6 (Ser-235/Ser-236), p38 (Thr-180/Tyr-182), RSK (Ser-380), and MSK (Ser-376), but not S6K1 (Thr-389) and 4E-BP1 (Thr-37/Thr-46). By contrast, when DMEM(−AA) was used, amino acids induced the phosphorylation of S6K1 (Thr-389 and Thr-421/Ser-424), S6 (Ser-235/Ser-236), and 4E-BP1 (Thr-37/Thr-46), but not the phosphorylation of Akt (Thr-308 and Ser-473), p38 (Thr-180/Tyr-182), RSK (Ser-380), or MSK (Ser-376). Amino acids inhibited ERK1/2 phosphorylation in both starvation conditions. Interestingly, we also observed a similar autophagy regulation (measured as LC3-II levels (70)) with both media (Fig. 7B), in agreement with one of the earliest physiological observations in the field of amino acid signaling (71, 72).

FIGURE 7.
Amino acid signaling mechanisms depend on starvation conditions. After serum deprivation, HeLa (A, C, and D) or HEK293 (B) cells were deprived for 2 h of amino acids using either DPBS or DMEM(−AA) medium (DMEM without serum and without amino acids). ...

One could argue that at least some of these effects could be mediated by a differential activation of AMP kinase in the two starvation conditions. To check this point, we analyzed the phosphorylation of AMP kinase (Thr-172) with both media. We did not find differences in AMP kinase activation between both conditions (data not shown).

To further confirm the differential activation observed with amino acids, we performed inhibitor assays with both starvation media (Fig. 7, C and D). Rapamycin, wortmannin, and the hVps34 inhibitor 3-methyladenine inhibited the stimulation by amino acids of S6K1, S6 ribosomal protein, and 4E-BP1 phosphorylations only when cells were previously starved in DMEM(−AA), in agreement with previous reports (36, 38). In these conditions, this pathway is regulated by mTORC1 and the class III PI3K hVps34 (2). Instead, when cells were starved in DPBS, the stimulation by amino acids of S6K1 and S6 ribosomal protein was regulated by the MAPK pathway, independently of mTORC1 (39). In these conditions, amino acids induced Akt phosphorylations through Class I PI3K and mTORC2, as we have shown above. siRNA assays confirmed this differential pathway activation (Fig. 8). In DMEM(−AA)-starved cells, knockdown of mTOR greatly inhibited S6K1 (Thr-389 and Thr-421/Ser-424), S6 ribosomal protein (Ser-235/Ser-236), and 4E-BP1 (Thr-37/Thr-46) phosphorylations, confirming the mTOR dependence of this pathway, as described previously (3). On the other hand, in DPBS-starved cells, knockdown of mTOR only inhibited Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 8).

FIGURE 8.
mTOR dependence in the signaling by amino acids. HeLa cells were transfected with either mTOR siRNA or nontargeting (NT) control siRNA 48 h before serum deprivation. Starvation and stimulation by amino acids were as in Fig. 7. Cellular lysates were analyzed ...

To test whether the starvation time used could affect the Akt/mTORC2 activation, we analyzed amino acid-induced responses at different times of starvation with DPBS. Fig. 9 shows how amino acids may activate Akt/mTORC2 when cells were starved for 2–3 h with DPBS, pointing out that the starvation time is a important factor to activate this pathway.

FIGURE 9.
Amino acid signaling depends on DPBS starvation time. HeLa cells were deprived of serum overnight. After serum withdrawal, they were deprived with DPBS medium for the indicated times. Finally the cells were stimulated with 1× amino acids for 30 ...

The relevance of mTORC activation was also analyzed with a more physiological assay: supplementation of cells with amino acids. HeLa cells were incubated in DMEM complete medium for 48 h. After this time, amino acids were added to 1× final concentration. Under these conditions, we could observe a significant activation of mTORC1 (phosphorylations of 4E-BP1 at Thr-37/Thr-46, S6K1 at Thr-389, and S6 at Ser-235/Ser-236) and mTORC2 (phosphorylations of Akt at Ser-473 and FOXO3a at Thr-32) complexes (Fig. 10).

FIGURE 10.
Amino acid supplementation leads to activation of mTORC1 and mTORC2. HeLa cells were supplemented with 1× amino acids for 30 min after 48 h in DMEM complete medium. Cellular lysates were analyzed by Western blot with the indicated antibodies. ...

Altogether, these data demonstrate that both mTOR signaling pathways (mTORC1 and mTORC2) may be used by cells to respond to amino acids. Activation of these pathways is highly dependent upon the precise starvation conditions to which cells have been subjected prior to amino acid stimulation.

DISCUSSION

The activity of mTOR complexes regulates essential cellular processes, such as growth, proliferation, or survival. At the organismal level, deregulation of mTOR complex activity has been linked to aging and to diseases like diabetes or cancer (11, 23,26). Furthermore, mTOR inhibitors have been used to extend lifespan in mice and in clinical treatments of several human cancers, including mantle cell lymphoma, endometrial cancer, and renal cell carcinoma (26, 73, 74). Nutrients, and in particular amino acids, have arisen as important regulators of mTORC1 activation, thus affecting cell growth, protein synthesis, and autophagy via phosphorylations of S6K1 and 4EBP1 (2, 8, 10,12, 75).

Here, we demonstrate that amino acids can also induce Akt phosphorylation at both Thr-308 and Ser-473 and that both phosphorylations are mediated by PI3Kα, an isoform that is crucial for embryogenesis (76). Our finding that amino acids can signal via class I PI3K was unexpected, because previous results had described amino acids to signal via the class III PI3K hVps34 (35, 36, 38). This newly identified class I PI3K/Akt signaling pathway for amino acids may explain some effects reported for nutrients in different physiological/pathological situations. For example, activating mutations of PI3K are often found in cancer (77) and so is overexpression of Akt (78). Interestingly, it has recently been shown that tumors harboring a constitutively active PI3K/Akt pathway become resistant to dietary restriction (77), as opposed to other tumors, whose growth is severely curtailed by dietary restriction (79, 80). In view of our results, these previously unexplained data may reflect the activation of PI3K/Akt signaling by amino acids in dietary restriction-sensitive tumors, but this still needs to be addressed experimentally. In another example, high blood levels of branched chain amino acids have been shown to correlate with insulin-resistant obesity (23). Given our data, it is conceivable that such an increase in amino acids could raise PI3K/Akt pathway activity in obese individuals, thus contributing to the insulin-resistant obese phenotype. Outside the realm of disease, dietary restriction has also been associated with an increase in lifespan (81,83), and more experiments will be needed to elucidate what role amino acid-induced PI3K/Akt signaling plays in that context.

We also checked whether amino acid-induced Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation was due to mTORC2, as reported for insulin signaling (42). Using mTOR and rictor siRNAs and in vitro kinase assays, we demonstrate that Ser-473 is indeed phosphorylated by mTORC2 in response to amino acids. Interestingly, we also observed that Akt Thr-308 phosphorylation depended on the presence of mTOR but not of rictor (Figs. 4 and and8).8). Kinase assays show that Akt Thr-308 is not a substrate of mTOR complexes activated by amino acids (Fig. 5). Although more work is needed to comprehend this exclusive mechanism for the amino acid signaling (insulin did not show this mechanism), these data seem to suggest that Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation stabilizes Akt Thr-308 phosphorylation in an mTOR-dependent manner but independent of kinase activities of mTORC1 and mTORC2. We also observed that Akt phosphorylations in response to amino acids lead to the full Akt activation. Thus, we observed the phosphorylation of Akt substrate FOXO3a (Fig. 6). This is an important fact, because in this way amino acids may regulate cell survival and apoptosis. In agreement with these data, dietary restriction has been described to inhibit the PI3K/Akt pathway and induce a prominent pro-apoptotic effect through FOXO (84). On the other hand, the mTORC2 complex has been described to be sensitive to rapamycin in prolonged treatments (6), and such rapamycin treatments extend lifespan in mice (26). The prolonged lifespan seems to be due to a combination of anti-neoplastic effects and effects on cellular stress resistance in response to nutrients. These effects were achieved in rapamycin-fed mice by inhibiting mTORC1, but it cannot be ruled out that such prolonged treatments also affect mTORC2 (6), and thus the transcriptional activity of FOXO. However, with shorter treatments, any rapamycin inhibitory effect could not be detected upon mTORC2 signal (supplemental Fig. S1). Therefore, this new FOXO regulation pathway induced by amino acids may provide new and valuable insights into the mechanisms of aging, apoptosis, and tumor growth regulation.

It was previously shown that amino acids may regulate the activity of S6K1, S6 ribosomal protein, and 4EBP1 proteins through activation of mTORC1 and not through activation of Akt or mTORC2 (3, 22, 36,38). Recently, it has been reported that some basal activity of p38 is required for mTORC1 activity (85). Another signaling pathway has also been described to S6K1 stimulated by amino acids and independent of mTOR (39). This last activation pathway leads to S6K1 and S6 phosphorylations through MAPKs instead of via mTORC1 or hVps34. Now, we demonstrate that amino acids can also signal to Akt and FOXO via class I PI3K and mTORC2 (Fig. 11). To understand and integrate all of these results, we analyzed the specific conditions leading to activation of each of these pathways. We show here some critical differences between these studies such as the amino acid deprivation medium (DPBS or DMEM(−AA)) and the starvation time. Thus, we demonstrate that it is possible to activate, with the same nutritional stimuli, different signaling pathways depending on the deprivation medium used and the starvation time (Figs. 779 and and11).11). When DPBS is used for 2–3 h, amino acids activate S6K1 and S6 ribosomal protein independently of mTORC1. In these conditions, amino acids also activate mTORC2, thus leading to Akt and FOXO phosphorylations, affecting cell survival and proliferation. On the other hand, when DMEM (−AA) is used, amino acids regulate S6K1, S6 ribosomal protein, and 4EBP1 in an mTORC1-dependent manner but independently of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Interestingly, autophagy was activated in a similar manner with both deprivation media, decreasing after stimulation with amino acids, thus suggesting that autophagy can be regulated by mechanisms dependent and independent of mTORC1 (39) (Figs. 7C and and11).11). We could also demonstrate that when DMEM (−AA) is used, amino acids signal through class III PI3K pathway (2, 28, 35,37), whereas when DPBS is used, amino acids signal through class I PI3K and MAPK. A systematic analysis of the components of amino acid deprivation media will probably allow us to identify the factors responsible for these differential effects.

FIGURE 11.
A putative model of how amino acids may stimulate cell proliferation and survival pathways. When cells are supplemented with amino acids, kinase activities of mTORC1 (measured as the phosphorylation of their substrates: 4E-BP1 at Thr-37/Thr-46 and S6K1 ...

Recently, DEPTOR has been described as an mTOR-binding protein that negatively regulates mTORC1 and mTORC2 activities (5). In serum-stimulated cells, the loss of DEPTOR activates S6K1, Akt, and SGK1, promoting cell growth and survival. Conversely, DEPTOR overexpression in the presence of nutrients inhibits mTORC1 but unexpectedly activates mTORC2 via PI3K/Akt signaling (5). This mTORC2 activation could be due to a block in the inhibitory feedback signal transmitted from mTORC1 to PI3K (5). An attractive hypothesis is that a similar mechanism could account for mTORC2 activation by amino acids. Interestingly, these authors show a relationship between mTORC2 activation and cancer. They find that deregulated overexpression of DEPTOR in multiple myeloma cells is a mechanism for activating PI3K/Akt signaling and promoting cell survival (5).

Finally, this report shows the crucial importance of dietary restriction/starvation conditions for understanding the amino acid signaling. Several studies show the effects of amino acid intake in obesity (23, 27, 28) and of dietary restriction in human cancers (79, 80). Although more physiological studies are needed to link these effects to mTOR complex regulation, it is noteworthy that a study in human muscle shows activation of both mTORC1 and mTORC2 by ingestion of a leucine-enriched amino acid-carbohydrate mixture (86). It has been recently described that branched chain amino acid dietary supplementation increased the average life span in mice and cardiac and skeletal muscle improvement (87), validating the physiological relevance of amino acid supplementation. In this context, we now report that cell supplementation with amino acids can activate both mTOR complexes (Figs. 10 and and11).11). In summary, this manuscript shows for the first time that amino acids can activate mTORC1 and mTORC2 complexes, thus underscoring the crucial importance of these nutrients in cell metabolism and offering new mechanistic insights with potential therapeutic applications in cancer, obesity, and aging.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data:

Acknowledgments

We thank F. R. Garcia-Gonzalo, F. Amair-Pinedo, and M. Cubillos-Rojas for critical reading of the manuscript; E. Adanero for technical assistance; and M. Camps for generously providing PI3K inhibitors.

*This work was supported in part by Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (MEC) Grant BFU2008-02084/BMC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III Redes Temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa en Salud Grant RD06/0020 and Generalitat de Catalunya Grant 2009SGR1059.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpgThe on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1 and S2.

3The abbreviations used are:

mTOR
mammalian target of rapamycin
DPBS
Dulbecco's PBS
DMEM(−AA)
DMEM without amino acids
RSK
90 kDa ribosomal S6 kinase
MSK
mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase.

REFERENCES

1. Wullschleger S., Loewith R., Hall M. N. (2006) Cell. 124, 471–484 [PubMed]
2. Laplante M., Sabatini D. M. (2009) J. Cell Sci. 122, 3589–3594 [PubMed]
3. Kim D. H., Sarbassov D. D., Ali S. M., King J. E., Latek R. R., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Sabatini D. M. (2002) Cell. 110, 163–175 [PubMed]
4. Dann S. G., Selvaraj A., Thomas G. (2007) Trends Mol Med. 13, 252–259 [PubMed]
5. Peterson T. R., Laplante M., Thoreen C. C., Sancak Y., Kang S. A., Kuehl W. M., Gray N. S., Sabatini D. M. (2009) Cell. 137, 873–886 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Sarbassov D. D., Ali S. M., Sengupta S., Sheen J. H., Hsu P. P., Bagley A. F., Markhard A. L., Sabatini D. M. (2006) Mol Cell. 22, 159–168 [PubMed]
7. Pearce L. R., Huang X., Boudeau J., Pawlowski R., Wullschleger S., Deak M., Ibrahim A. F., Gourlay R., Magnuson M. A., Alessi D. R. (2007) Biochem. J. 405, 513–522 [PubMed]
8. Kanazawa T., Taneike I., Akaishi R., Yoshizawa F., Furuya N., Fujimura S., Kadowaki M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 8452–8459 [PubMed]
9. Meijer A. J., Codogno P. (2004) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36, 2445–2462 [PubMed]
10. Sarbassov D. D., Ali S. M., Sabatini D. M. (2005) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 596–603 [PubMed]
11. Drummond M. J., Dreyer H. C., Fry C. S., Glynn E. L., Rasmussen B. B. (2009) J. Appl. Physiol. 106, 1374–1384 [PubMed]
12. Yamaoka I., Doi M., Kawano Y., Nakayama M., Watanabe Y., Oba K., Sugahara K., Yoshizawa F. (2009) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 386, 252–256 [PubMed]
13. Franke T. F., Kaplan D. R., Cantley L. C. (1997) Cell 88, 435–437 [PubMed]
14. Brunet A., Bonni A., Zigmond M. J., Lin M. Z., Juo P., Hu L. S., Anderson M. J., Arden K. C., Blenis J., Greenberg M. E. (1999) Cell 96, 857–868 [PubMed]
15. Sabatini D. M., Barrow R. K., Blackshaw S., Burnett P. E., Lai M. M., Field M. E., Bahr B. A., Kirsch J., Betz H., Snyder S. H. (1999) Science 284, 1161–1164 [PubMed]
16. Sarbassov D. D., Ali S. M., Kim D. H., Guertin D. A., Latek R. R., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Sabatini D. M. (2004) Curr. Biol. 14, 1296–1302 [PubMed]
17. García-Martínez J. M., Alessi D. R. (2008) Biochem. J. 416, 375–385 [PubMed]
18. Alessi D. R., Pearce L. R., García-Martínez J. M. (2009) Sci. Signal. 2, pe27 [PubMed]
19. Avruch J., Hara K., Lin Y., Liu M., Long X., Ortiz-Vega S., Yonezawa K. (2006) Oncogene 25, 6361–6372 [PubMed]
20. Bhaskar P. T., Hay N. (2007) Dev. Cell. 12, 487–502 [PubMed]
21. Beugnet A., Wang X., Proud C. G. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 40717–40722 [PubMed]
22. Nicklin P., Bergman P., Zhang B., Triantafellow E., Wang H., Nyfeler B., Yang H., Hild M., Kung C., Wilson C., Myer V. E., MacKeigan J. P., Porter J. A., Wang Y. K., Cantley L. C., Finan P. M., Murphy L. O. (2009) Cell 136, 521–534 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Newgard C. B., An J., Bain J. R., Muehlbauer M. J., Stevens R. D., Lien L. F., Haqq A. M., Shah S. H., Arlotto M., Slentz C. A., Rochon J., Gallup D., Ilkayeva O., Wenner B. R., Yancy W. S., Jr., Eisenson H., Musante G., Surwit R. S., Millington D. S., Butler M. D., Svetkey L. P. (2009) Cell Metab. 9, 311–326 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Toden S., Bird A. R., Topping D. L., Conlon M. A. (2007) Carcinogenesis 28, 2355–2362 [PubMed]
25. Mrkonjic M., Chappell E., Pethe V. V., Manno M., Daftary D., Greenwood C. M., Gallinger S., Zanke B. W., Knight J. A., Bapat B. (2009) Br. J. Cancer 100, 1966–1974 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Harrison D. E., Strong R., Sharp Z. D., Nelson J. F., Astle C. M., Flurkey K., Nadon N. L., Wilkinson J. E., Frenkel K., Carter C. S., Pahor M., Javors M. A., Fernandez E., Miller R. A. (2009) Nature 460, 392–395 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Krebs M. (2005) Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 35, 351–354 [PubMed]
28. Um S. H., D'Alessio D., Thomas G. (2006) Cell Metab. 3, 393–402 [PubMed]
29. Calle E. E., Kaaks R. (2004) Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 579–591 [PubMed]
30. Blommaart E. F., Luiken J. J., Blommaart P. J., van Woerkom G. M., Meijer A. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2320–2326 [PubMed]
31. Hara K., Yonezawa K., Weng Q. P., Kozlowski M. T., Belham C., Avruch J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14484–14494 [PubMed]
32. Dennis P. B., Pullen N., Kozma S. C., Thomas G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6242–6251 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Weng Q. P., Kozlowski M., Belham C., Zhang A., Comb M. J., Avruch J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16621–16629 [PubMed]
34. Nojima H., Tokunaga C., Eguchi S., Oshiro N., Hidayat S., Yoshino K., Hara K., Tanaka N., Avruch J., Yonezawa K. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 15461–15464 [PubMed]
35. Byfield M. P., Murray J. T., Backer J. M. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 33076–33082 [PubMed]
36. Nobukuni T., Joaquin M., Roccio M., Dann S. G., Kim S. Y., Gulati P., Byfield M. P., Backer J. M., Natt F., Bos J. L., Zwartkruis F. J., Thomas G. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 14238–14243 [PubMed]
37. Findlay G. M., Yan L., Procter J., Mieulet V., Lamb R. F. (2007) Biochem. J. 403, 13–20 [PubMed]
38. Gulati P., Gaspers L. D., Dann S. G., Joaquin M., Nobukuni T., Natt F., Kozma S. C., Thomas A. P., Thomas G. (2008) Cell Metab. 7, 456–465 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Casas-Terradellas E., Tato I., Bartrons R., Ventura F., Rosa J. L. (2008) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1783, 2241–2254 [PubMed]
40. Jacinto E., Facchinetti V., Liu D., Soto N., Wei S., Jung S. Y., Huang Q., Qin J., Su B. (2006) Cell 127, 125–137 [PubMed]
41. Engelman J. A. (2009) Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 550–562 [PubMed]
42. Sarbassov D. D., Guertin D. A., Ali S. M., Sabatini D. M. (2005) Science 307, 1098–1101 [PubMed]
43. Jackson S. P., Schoenwaelder S. M., Goncalves I., Nesbitt W. S., Yap C. L., Wright C. E., Kenche V., Anderson K. E., Dopheide S. M., Yuan Y., Sturgeon S. A., Prabaharan H., Thompson P. E., Smith G. D., Shepherd P. R., Daniele N., Kulkarni S., Abbott B., Saylik D., Jones C., Lu L., Giuliano S., Hughan S. C., Angus J. A., Robertson A. D., Salem H. H. (2005) Nat. Med. 11, 507–514 [PubMed]
44. Sadhu C., Dick K., Tino W. T., Staunton D. E. (2003) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 308, 764–769 [PubMed]
45. Billottet C., Grandage V. L., Gale R. E., Quattropani A., Rommel C., Vanhaesebroeck B., Khwaja A. (2006) Oncogene 25, 6648–6659 [PubMed]
46. Rückle T., Biamonte M., Grippi-Vallotton T., Arkinstall S., Cambet Y., Camps M., Chabert C., Church D. J., Halazy S., Jiang X., Martinou I., Nichols A., Sauer W., Gotteland J. P. (2004) J. Med. Chem. 47, 6921–6934 [PubMed]
47. Hsieh A. C., Bo R., Manola J., Vazquez F., Bare O., Khvorova A., Scaringe S., Sellers W. R. (2004) Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 893–901 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Wang X., Beugnet A., Murakami M., Yamanaka S., Proud C. G. (2005) Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 2558–2572 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Casas-Terradellas E., Garcia-Gonzalo F. R., Hadjebi O., Bartrons R., Ventura F., Rosa J. L. (2006) Electrophoresis 27, 3935–3938 [PubMed]
50. Haruta T., Uno T., Kawahara J., Takano A., Egawa K., Sharma P. M., Olefsky J. M., Kobayashi M. (2000) Mol. Endocrinol. 14, 783–794 [PubMed]
51. Takano A., Usui I., Haruta T., Kawahara J., Uno T., Iwata M., Kobayashi M. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5050–5062 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Carlson C. J., White M. F., Rondinone C. M. (2004) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 316, 533–539 [PubMed]
53. Harrington L. S., Findlay G. M., Gray A., Tolkacheva T., Wigfield S., Rebholz H., Barnett J., Leslie N. R., Cheng S., Shepherd P. R., Gout I., Downes C. P., Lamb R. F. (2004) J. Cell Biol. 166, 213–223 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Chaussade C., Rewcastle G. W., Kendall J. D., Denny W. A., Cho K., Grønning L. M., Chong M. L., Anagnostou S. H., Jackson S. P., Daniele N., Shepherd P. R. (2007) Biochem. J. 404, 449–458 [PubMed]
55. Guertin D. A., Stevens D. M., Thoreen C. C., Burds A. A., Kalaany N. Y., Moffat J., Brown M., Fitzgerald K. J., Sabatini D. M. (2006) Dev. Cell 11, 859–871 [PubMed]
56. Huang J., Dibble C. C., Matsuzaki M., Manning B. D. (2008) Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 4104–4115 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Toschi A., Lee E., Xu L., Garcia A., Gadir N., Foster D. A. (2009) Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 1411–1420 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Dudek H., Datta S. R., Franke T. F., Birnbaum M. J., Yao R., Cooper G. M., Segal R. A., Kaplan D. R., Greenberg M. E. (1997) Science. 275, 661–665 [PubMed]
59. Kauffmann-Zeh A., Rodriguez-Viciana P., Ulrich E., Gilbert C., Coffer P., Downward J., Evan G. (1997) Nature. 385, 544–548 [PubMed]
60. Songyang Z., Baltimore D., Cantley L. C., Kaplan D. R., Franke T. F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 11345–11350 [PubMed]
61. Birkenkamp K. U., Coffer P. J. (2003) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 292–297 [PubMed]
62. Huang H., Tindall D. J. (2007) J. Cell Sci. 120, 2479–2487 [PubMed]
63. Obsil T., Obsilova V. (2008) Oncogene 27, 2263–2275 [PubMed]
64. Essaghir A., Dif N., Marbehant C. Y., Coffer P. J., Demoulin J. B. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 10334–10342 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. DeFeo-Jones D., Barnett S. F., Fu S., Hancock P. J., Haskell K. M., Leander K. R., McAvoy E., Robinson R. G., Duggan M. E., Lindsley C. W., Zhao Z., Huber H. E., Jones R. E. (2005) Mol. Cancer Ther. 4, 271–279 [PubMed]
66. Xiao L., Gong L. L., Yuan D., Deng M., Zeng X. M., Chen L. L., Zhang L., Yan Q., Liu J. P., Hu X. H., Sun S. M., Liu J., Ma H. L., Zheng C. B., Fu H., Chen P. C., Zhao J. Q., Xie S. S., Zou L. J., Xiao Y. M., Liu W. B., Zhang J., Liu Y., Li D. W. (2010) Cell Death Differ. 17, 1448–1462 [PubMed]
67. Campbell L. E., Wang X., Proud C. G. (1999) Biochem. J. 344, 433–441 [PubMed]
68. Wang X., Fonseca B. D., Tang H., Liu R., Elia A., Clemens M. J., Bommer U. A., Proud C. G. (2008) J. Biol. Chem. 283, 30482–30492 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
69. Foster K. G., Acosta-Jaquez H. A., Romeo Y., Ekim B., Soliman G. A., Carriere A., Roux P. P., Ballif B. A., Fingar D. C. (2010) J. Biol. Chem. 285, 80–94 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
70. Kabeya Y., Mizushima N., Ueno T., Yamamoto A., Kirisako T., Noda T., Kominami E., Ohsumi Y., Yoshimori T. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 5720–5728 [PubMed]
71. Mortimore G. E., Schworer C. M. (1977) Nature. 270, 174–176 [PubMed]
72. Klionsky D. J. (2007) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 931–937 [PubMed]
73. Guertin D. A., Sabatini D. M. (2007) Cancer Cell 12, 9–22 [PubMed]
74. Bjedov I., Toivonen J. M., Kerr F., Slack C., Jacobson J., Foley A., Partridge L. (2010) Cell Metab. 11, 35–46 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Yoshizawa F. (2004) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 313, 417–422 [PubMed]
76. Bi L., Okabe I., Bernard D. J., Wynshaw-Boris A., Nussbaum R. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10963–10968 [PubMed]
77. Kalaany N. Y., Sabatini D. M. (2009) Nature 458, 725–731 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Rychahou P. G., Kang J., Gulhati P., Doan H. Q., Chen L. A., Xiao S. Y., Chung D. H., Evers B. M. (2008) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20315–20320 [PubMed]
79. Kritchevsky D. (2001) J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 47, 13–19 [PubMed]
80. Thompson H. J., Zhu Z., Jiang W. (2003) J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia 8, 133–142 [PubMed]
81. Panowski S. H., Wolff S., Aguilaniu H., Durieux J., Dillin A. (2007) Nature 447, 550–555 [PubMed]
82. Grandison R. C., Piper M. D., Partridge L. (2009) Nature 462, 1061–1064 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Selman C., Tullet J. M., Wieser D., Irvine E., Lingard S. J., Choudhury A. I., Claret M., Al-Qassab H., Carmignac D., Ramadani F., Woods A., Robinson I. C., Schuster E., Batterham R. L., Kozma S. C., Thomas G., Carling D., Okkenhaug K., Thornton J. M., Partridge L., Gems D., Withers D. J. (2009) Science. 326, 140–144 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
84. Fu Z., Tindall D. J. (2008) Oncogene 27, 2312–2319 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
85. Cully M., Genevet A., Warne P., Treins C., Liu T., Bastien J., Baum B., Tapon N., Leevers S. J., Downward J. (2010) Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 481–495 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
86. Fujita S., Dreyer H. C., Drummond M. J., Glynn E. L., Cadenas J. G., Yoshizawa F., Volpi E., Rasmussen B. B. (2007) J Physiol. 582, 813–823 [PubMed]
87. D'Antona G., Ragni M., Cardile A., Tudesco L., Dossena M., Bruttini F., Caliaro F., Corsetti G., Bottinelli R., Carruba M. O., Valerio A., Nisoli E. (2010) Cell Metab. 12, 362–372 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology