It has been known for several years that the PP2A C subunit
is methylated at its carboxy terminus, but a biological function for
this posttranslational modification has not yet been directly
demonstrated. Here, we present four independent lines of evidence to
show that methylation is essential for the binding of Bα subunit to
the A/C heterodimer but not for association of MT, striatin, and SG2NA.
First, deletion of leucine 309 abolished Bα subunit binding, whereas
it enhanced binding to striatin and SG2NA and had no effect on MT
association. Second, loss of C subunit methylation by mutation of other
residues had effects similar to deletion of leucine 309. Third,
demethylation of C subunit in vitro using purified PME-1 disrupted
A/C/Bα complexes but not A/C/MT complexes. Finally,
immunoprecipitations prepared from cells with reduced C subunit
methylation showed that SG2NA and striatin can associate with
unmethylated C subunit, whereas Bα subunits complexed exclusively
with the remaining population of methylated C subunits. These findings
provide evidence that reversible protein methylation at a single
residue, much like phosphorylation, is capable of regulating
protein-protein interactions and enzyme activity and demonstrate the
first known function for PP2A methylation. In addition, the results of
this study indicate the importance of specific C subunit
carboxy-terminal residues and, more surprisingly, active site residues
for efficient methylation. Two models consistent with these
findings are either that the active site and the carboxy terminus are
needed for recognition by methyltransferase and/or methylesterase
enzymes or that mutations induce conformational changes elsewhere in
PP2A that affect the interaction with these enzymes.
The complete loss of Bα subunit binding to L309Δ (as well as
other C subunit mutants) cannot be due to competition between Bα and
MT. MT is expressed only at ~10% the level of PP2A in these cells
(Haehnel and Pallas, unpublished data;
Ulug et al., 1992 
),
and overexpression of 10 times as much MT via an adenovirus does not
cause complete dissociation of Bα subunit (Green and Pallas,
unpublished). In addition, all MT in these cells is already bound to
PP2A (
Pallas et al., 1989 
); therefore, no excess MT is
available to compete off additional Bα subunit. Our findings with
L309Δ confirm that of
Bryant et al. (1999) 
, who showed
that a single mutant (L309A) did not bind Bα subunit and would not
incorporate methyl groups in vitro. We have also shown that leucine 309
is not important for several other viral and cellular PP2A regulatory
subunits. Because the only mutant in the study of Bryant
et
al. changed leucine 309, they could not distinguish whether Bα
subunit binding was affected by loss of methylation, mutation of the
leucine residue, or both. Our analysis of multiple unmethylated mutants
that retained leucine 309 together with several biochemical approaches
have clearly demonstrated that methylation is required for binding of
Bα subunit.
We have also developed a methylation-sensitive antibody assay
that has the important advantage of measuring the steady-state
methylation level of C subunit in vivo. Similar assays utilizing
methylation-sensitive polyclonal antibodies have been used previously
as a means of evaluating in vivo PP2A methylation levels (
Favre
et al., 1994 
,
1997 
;
Turowski et al., 1995 
), but
here we have used milder conditions and a chemilumimager to obtain
quantitative data on methylation. The immunoprecipitated C subunit that
was analyzed typically consisted of 15–20% of the total cellular C
subunit, raising the possibility that it was not representative of the
total pool of expressed protein. However, most HA-tagged C subunits
were also analyzed directly in lysates for steady-state methylation
level and gave similar results in every case (Yu, Du, Moreno, Green,
and Pallas, unpublished data), indicating that the
immunoprecipitation data are representative.
Mutational analysis of PP2A C subunit showed that loss of
methylation induced by individual substitution of any one of five
separate residues resulted in loss of Bα subunit binding but not of
MT, striatin, or SG2NA binding. In fact, the binding characteristics of
some of the mutants are consistent with the possibility that loss of C
subunit methylation might increase striatin and SG2NA binding to the
A/C heterodimer. Mutations in completely different regions of the C
subunit protein primary sequence (positions 59, 85, 89, 118, and 307)
were able to simultaneously affect methylation and Bα subunit
binding, indicating a strong connection between the two events.
Although two of the active site mutants (H59Q and H118Q) form a stable
complex with PME-1 (
Ogris et al., 1999a 
), the other two
active site mutants do not, excluding the possibility that loss of Bα
subunit binding is due to stable PME-1 association. The data also show
that the dramatic loss of methylation seen with several mutants was not
an indirect effect produced by loss of Bα subunit binding. Four
separate C subunit mutants (T301D, T304D, T304N, and T304K) had very
low or no Bα subunit binding and yet retained 80–89% of the wt
level of methylation. Thus, Bα subunit binding is not necessary to
maintain high methylation levels of C subunit. Taken together, these
results strongly support the hypothesis that C subunit methylation
positively regulates Bα subunit binding to the A/C heterodimer.
The B subunit antibody used to detect B subunit associating with
the various mutant C subunits (
Ogris et al., 1997 
,
1999a 
,
b 
)
was raised against a large portion of the Bα subunit containing
extensive sequence identity with other B subunit isoforms (β, γ,
and δ). Two-dimensional gel immunoblot analysis indicates
that this antibody recognizes multiple isoforms of B subunit (Huehnel,
Park, and Pallas, unpublished data). The fact that no B subunit
could be detected by this antibody in immunoprecipitates of many
unmethylated C subunit mutants (
Ogris et al., 1997 
,
1999b 
)
suggests that B subunit isoforms other than Bα also probably require
methylation for efficient association with the A/C heterodimer.
We have recently obtained evidence showing that C subunit methylation
is important for the efficient association of both B and B′ subunits in
yeast (Wei
et al., in press). We identified the major PP2A
methyltransferase in
S. cerevisiae as Ppm1p and found that
deletion of the
PPM1 gene resulted in almost complete loss
of C subunit (Pph21p/Pph22p) methylation. Loss of methylation resulted
in greatly decreased association of the B (Cdc55p) and B′ (Rts1p)
subunits and, to a lesser degree, of A subunit (Tpd3p). Moreover, cells
deleted for
PPM1 exhibited nocodazole sensitivity, a known
phenotype of
CDC55 disruption, indicating that loss of
methylation can affect PP2A function. Two other groups have published
concurrent studies describing findings similar to ours in both yeast
(
Wu et al., 2000 
) and mammalian systems (
Tolstykh et
al., 2000 
). Wu
et al. also identified Ppm1p as the
major methyltransferase, found that methylation is important for
association of Tpd3p and Cdc55p, and showed that deletion of
PPM1 causes nocodazole sensitivity (
Wu et al.,
2000 
). However, in contrast to our data (Wei
et al., in
press), they observed a small amount of residual binding of Cdc55p in
the absence of methylation, which may be the result of differences in
experimental conditions. Consistent with our data demonstrating the
importance of C subunit methylation for Bα association with A/C
heterodimers in mammalian cells, Tolstykh
et al. showed that
methylation of A/C heterodimers enhanced their association with B
subunit in vitro (
Tolstykh et al., 2000 
). In addition, they
presented data suggesting that C subunit methylation increases the
affinity of the A/C heterodimer for B′ subunits in mammalian cells.
Finally, the only other regulatory subunit of PP2A for which there is
any evidence suggesting a possible effect of methylation is alpha 4,
which unlike the regulatory subunits discussed above, binds to C
subunit but not A subunit. Alpha 4 has been recently reported to have
increased binding to a C subunit mutant altered at both Y307 and L309
(
Chung et al., 1999 
), suggesting that methylation is not
required for alpha 4 association with C subunit and actually may
inhibit it. Consistent with this possibility, Wu
et al. (
Wu
et al., 2000 
) found that association of C subunit with the
yeast homolog of alpha 4 (Tap42) is enhanced ~50% by disruption of
PPM1.
Addition of the PP2A methylesterase, PME-1, to cell lysates
caused C subunit demethylation and dissociation of C subunit from the
Bα subunit-containing complexes but not from MT complexes or from
Aα subunit. Thus, PME-1 demethylates A/C/Bα complexes and induces
dissociation of Bα from A/C in vitro, suggesting that it may perform
a similar function in vivo. Although it is possible that the
exogenously added PME-1 may have physically competed off the Bα
subunit from the A/C heterodimer, this seems unlikely because, unlike
Bα subunit, PME-1 does not have high enough affinity for wt C
subunit to stably complex with it (
Ogris et al., 1999a 
).
Furthermore, immunoblotting showed that the amount of
added PME-1 represented as little as eightfold more than was present in
the untreated lysates. Moreover, addition of inactive PME-1 at a
concentration 64-fold above the endogenous level neither demethylated
the C subunit nor displaced Bα subunit (McQuoid and Pallas,
unpublished data). Because A/C/Bα heterotrimers exist in a dynamic
equilibrium with A/C heterodimers, it is possible that, as Bα subunit
naturally dissociates from the A/C heterodimer, exogenously added PME-1
could demethylate the A/C heterodimer, decreasing its affinity for Bα
and preventing reassociation. This hypothesis would be consistent with
the findings of Tolstykh
et al. (
Tolstykh et al.,
2000 
), who showed that A/C/Bα complexes are demethylated by PME-1 at
a much slower rate than A/C heterodimers.
Whereas a reduction in C subunit steady-state methylation in vivo
resulted in a decrease in methylation of C subunits associated with
striatin and SG2NA, Bα subunit-associated C subunits in the same cell
remained essentially 100% methylated. This suggests that Bα subunit
has a higher affinity than striatin and SG2NA for methylated C subunits
and that methylation is essential for Bα subunit but not striatin and
SG2NA binding to the A/C heterodimer. Because a substantial decrease in
Bα subunit association with A/C heterodimer was not observed in the
okadaic acid/AdOx-treated NIH3T3 cells, it can be inferred that Bα
subunit associates with less than 26% of C subunit in these cells. It
is possible that cells regulate Bα subunit association with the A/C
heterodimer simply by reducing C subunit methylation in a particular
cellular compartment below the level of associated Bα subunit.
Alternatively, there may be a mechanism for specifically demethylating
Bα subunit-associated C subunits by PME-1.
Earlier studies have shown that synthetic C subunit
carboxy-terminal peptides functioned neither as substrates nor
inhibitors of the PP2A methyltransferase (
Xie and Clarke, 1994 
) and
PP2A methylesterase (
Lee et al., 1996 
), suggesting that
carboxy-terminal residues might not be critical for interaction with
these enzymes. The observations that L309Δ, 301stop, and several
tyrosine 307 mutants abrogated methylation provide the first direct
evidence that C subunit carboxy-terminal residues are important for
recognition of PP2A by the methyltransferase and/or methylesterase
enzymes in vivo. Taken together, these data suggest that proper
recognition by the methyltransferase and/or methylesterase requires
both C subunit carboxy-terminal residues and additional structure.
Four individual point mutations in the active site nearly
abolished the methylation competence of the C subunit in a
cis manner, suggesting that residues or coordinated metals
in or near the active site may be part of the additional structure
needed for recognition by methyltransferase and/or methylesterase
enzymes. This hypothesis is supported by the recent finding that two of
these mutants formed stable complexes with PME-1 that could be
disrupted by PP2A inhibitors such as okadaic acid (
Ogris et
al., 1999a 
). Okadaic acid and microcystin-LR, whose binding sites
on PP2A are thought to overlap (
MacKintosh et al., 1990 
),
may thus inhibit PP2A methylation and/or demethylation (
Lee and Stock,
1993 
;
Floer and Stock, 1994 
;
Li and Damuni, 1994 
;
Lee et
al., 1996 
) because they overlap in binding with the
methyltransferase and methylesterase enzymes. Microcystin has been
shown to interact with multiple residues in the active site of the
highly related phosphatase, PP1 (
Goldberg et al., 1995 
),
including a PP1 residue corresponding to one of the PP2A residues
mutated in this study (arginine 89). An alternative hypothesis to a
direct interaction between the active site and the methyltransferase
and methylesterase enzymes is that mutations and inhibitors induce
conformational changes elsewhere in PP2A that affect the interaction
with these enzymes.
Protein phosphatase V, protein phosphatase G, and protein
phosphatase X, several phosphatases >50% identical to PP2A, have the
same three carboxy-terminal amino acids as PP2A, raising the
possibility that the PP2A methyltransferase and methylesterase enzymes
may also regulate these phosphatases. Whereas the methylation status of
protein phosphatase V and protein phosphatase G has not been reported,
protein phosphatase X is methylated on its C terminus (
Kloeker et
al., 1997 
). These phosphatases share two residues that have been
shown in this study to be essential for PP2A methylation—a tyrosine
analogous to PP2A tyrosine 307 and a carboxy-terminal leucine. Because
these phosphatases share >50% identity with PP2A, including the
active site residues mutated in this study, they may contain the other
structural information necessary for interaction with the PP2A
methyltransferase and/or methylesterase enzymes.
The observation that the unmethylated Y307E mutant was
greatly enriched in striatin and SG2NA complexes suggests that
phosphorylation of tyrosine 307 may enhance the affinity of C subunit
for these regulatory subunits. In contrast, phosphorylation of this
residue may inhibit Bα subunit binding (
Ogris et al.,
1997 
), perhaps indirectly by reducing methylation. Because the T304D
mutant is highly methylated, it is unlikely that phosphorylation of
threonine 304 regulates methylation. However, since this mutant cannot
bind Bα subunit (
Ogris et al., 1997 
), phosphorylation of
this residue might directly regulate Bα association. Our previous
data suggests that MT binding to the A/C heterodimer would be
unaffected by phosphorylation of threonine 304 or tyrosine 307 (
Ogris
et al., 1997 
). The current results indicate that MT binding
to PP2A is also independent of C subunit methylation. These two results
may have implications for how MT may circumvent normal cellular
regulation of PP2A.
On first consideration, the fact that Y307F has a twofold
decrease in methylation compared with wt C subunit and yet binds Bα
subunit as well or better than wt is puzzling. In the context of the
other results in this study, we would suggest that this mutation
simultaneously reduces recognition by a PP2A methyltransferase while
strengthening Bα subunit binding in an independent manner. This
result, in combination with the requirement for leucine 309 methylation
for Bα subunit binding, supports a model in which hydrophobic
interactions between the carboxy terminus of C subunit and Bα subunit
play a critical role in stabilizing the A/B/C heterotrimer. Also
consistent with this model is the fact that the T304A mutant exhibits
enhanced Bα subunit binding. Alternatively, methylation of the C
subunit carboxy terminus could induce a conformational change that
affects its interaction with different regulatory proteins. Structural
studies will be necessary to resolve these possibilities and to help
elucidate the mechanisms by which multiple signals and events involving
the C subunit carboxy terminus affect PP2A activity.