|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Spinal cord glutamate transporters clear synaptically released glutamate and maintain normal sensory transmission. However, their ultrastructural localization is unknown. Moreover, whether and how they participate in inflammatory pain has not been carefully studied.
Immunogold labeling with electron microscopy was carried out to characterize synaptic and non-synaptic localization of glutamate transporters in the superficial dorsal horn. Their expression and uptake activity after formalin- and complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)-induced inflammation were evaluated by Western blot and glutamate uptake assays. Effects of intrathecal glutamate transporter activator [(R)-(−)-5-methyl-1-nicotinoyl-2-pyrazoline], inhibitors [DL-threo-β-benzyloxyaspartate (TBOA), dihydrokainate, and DL-threo-beta-hydroxyaspartate], or TBOA plus a group III metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist [(RS)-α-methylserine-O-phosphate] on formalin- and CFA-induced inflammatory pain were examined.
In the superficial dorsal horn, excitatory amino acid carrier 1 is localized in pre-synaptic membrane, postsynaptic membrane, and axonal and dendritic membranes at non-synaptic sites, whereas glutamate transporter-1 and glutamate/aspartate transporter are prominent in glial membranes. Although expression of these three spinal glutamate transporters was not altered at 1 h after formalin injection or 6 h after CFA injection, glutamate uptake activity was decreased at these time points. Intrathecal (R)-(−)-5-methyl-1-nicotinoyl-2-pyrazoline had no effect on formalin-induced pain behaviors. In contrast, intrathecal TBOA, dihydrokainate, and DL-threo-beta-hydroxyaspartate reduced formalin-evoked pain behaviors in the second phase. Intrathecal TBOA also attenuated the CFA-induced thermal hyperalgesia at 6 h after CFA injection. The antinociceptive effects of TBOA were blocked by coadministration of (RS)-α-methylserine-O-phosphate.
Our findings suggest that spinal glutamate transporter inhibition relieves inflammatory pain through activation of inhibitory pre-synaptic group III metabotropic glutamate receptors.
The acidic amino acid glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the dorsal horn of spinal cord and participates in the induction and maintenance of pain hypersensitivity after tissue injury and inflammation.1,2 In dorsal horn, glutamate is released synaptically by primary afferent terminals, descending terminals from supraspinal regions, and excitatory interneurons.3 Activation of the group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in the primary afferent terminals inhibits the release of synaptic glutamate in the superficial dorsal horn.4,5 The synaptically released glutamate is also rapidly taken up through glutamate transporters to ensure high fidelity sensory transmission, to limit nonsynaptic neuronal excitation and hyperactivity, and to prevent excitatory toxicity.6 However, little is know about the regulation of synaptically released glutamate by spinal glutamate transporters under inflammatory pain conditions.
To date, five glutamate transporters have been cloned and characterized from animal and human tissues, including glutamate/aspartate transporter (GLAST), glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1), excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1), excitatory amino-acid transporter 4, and excitatory amino-acid transporter 5.2 Each has a distinct cellular and regional localization. EAAC1 is localized in neuronal cells of the nervous system, whereas GLAST and GLT-1 are predominantly present in glial cells throughout the central nervous system.7,8 Excitatory aminoacid transporter 4 has properties of a ligand-gated chloride channel and is localized mainly in cerebellar Purkinje cells.9 Excitatory amino-acid transporter 5 is retina-specific.10 We and others have shown that EAAC1, GLAST, and GLT-1 are expressed in spinal cord and that EAAC1 is also expressed in dorsal root ganglion.6,8,11–13 However, their synaptic and non-synaptic localization and distribution in the dorsal horn have not been carefully studied.
Spinal glutamate transporters play a role in normal sensory transmission and pathologic pain states. Spinal glutamate transporter inhibition produces hyperactivity of dorsal horn neurons, spontaneous nociceptive behaviors, and thermal and mechanical hypersensitivities in normal rats,14,15 suggesting that glutamate uptake through spinal glutamate transporters is required for maintaining normal sensory transmission. Unexpectedly, in pathologic pain states, inhibition of spinal glutamate transporter activity produces antinociceptive effects. For example, spinal glutamate transporter inhibition attenuated the induction of allodynia induced by intrathecal prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin F2α, and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid.16 In addition, inhibition or transient knockdown of spinal GLT-1 and GLAST led to a significant reduction of nociceptive behavior in the formalin model.12,17 However, knockdown of spinal GLAST did not affect zymosan-induced inflammatory pain.12 Moreover, intrathecal administration of a glutamate transporter activator, riluzole, reversed neuropathic pain behaviors.13 Thus, whether and how spinal glutamate transporters participate in pathologic pain is still not completely understood.
In the present study, we first characterized synaptic and non-synaptic localization and distribution of GLAST, GLT-1, and EAAC1 in the superficial dorsal horn of spinal cord. Furthermore, we examined whether regulating spinal glutamate transporter uptake activity affects inflammatory pain induced by intraplantar injection of formalin or complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA). Finally, we investigated whether inhibitory pre-synaptic group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are involved in spinal glutamate transporter function in inflammatory pain.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–300 g, Harlan Bioproducts for Science, Indianapolis, IN) were housed individually in cages on a standard 12 h-12 h light-dark cycle. Water and food were available ad libitum until rats were transported to the laboratory approximately 1 h before the experiments. The experiments were carried out with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD, USA) and were consistent with the ethical guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and the International Association for the Study of Pain. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.
The rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and implanted with an intrathecal catheter. A polyethylene-10 catheter was inserted into the subarachnoid space at the rostral level of the spinal cord lumbar enlargement through an incision at the atlanto-occipital membrane according to the method described previously.14,18,19 The animals were allowed to recover for a week before being used experimentally. Rats showing neurologic deficits postoperatively were discarded from the study. After the experiments, location of the intrathecal catheter was confirmed and lumbar enlargement segments were harvested for histochemical staining as described.14 Animal behavioral tests, including formalin testing and CFA-induced thermal testing, were carried out by one experimenter who was blinded to the treatment groups.
CFA and formalin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). (R)-(−)-5-methyl-1-nicotinoyl-2-pyrazoline (MS-153, a glutamate transporter activator) was a gift from the Life Science Laboratory of Mitsui Chemical (Chiba, Japan). Three glutamate transporter inhibitors, DL-threo-β-benzyloxyaspartate (TBOA), DL-threo-beta-hydroxyaspartate (DL-THA), and dihydrokainate, and a selective group III mGluR antagonist, (RS)-α-methylserine-O-phosphate (MSOP), were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Ellisville, MO). All drugs were dissolved in 0.9% physiological saline, and the doses used were based on data from previous studies14 and our pilot work.
The rats were placed individually in an open Plexiglas chamber (34×30×30 cm) for 1 h before actual experimental sessions. To examine whether altering spinal glutamate transporter uptake activity affected formalin-induced pain behaviors, we intrathecally injected saline (control; 10 μl; n = 10), MS-153 (10, 100, or 1,000 μg/10 μl; n = 5/dose), DL-THA (1.5, 7.5, or 15 μg/10 μl; n = 6/dose), dihydrokainate (2, 10, or 20 μg/10 μl; n = 7/dose), or TBOA (1, 5, or 10 μg/10 μl; n = 10/dose) followed by 10 μl of saline to flush the catheter. Ten minutes later, the experimenter injected 2% formalin (100 μl) into the plantar side of one hind paw and immediately placed the rat into a transparent cage to count the number of paw flinches and shakes over the next 60 min.20,21 The observational session was divided into two phases: 0–10 min and 10–60 min. The mean number of flinches and shakes for each period was calculated for each treatment group.
To examine the role of group III mGluRs in the antinociceptive effect produced by intrathecal TBOA in the formalin model, we intrathecally injected the rats with saline (10 μl; n = 5), MSOP (10 μg/10 μl; n = 5), TBOA (10 μg/10 μl; n = 5), or MSOP plus TBOA (n = 5). Ten minutes later, 2% formalin (100 μl) was injected into the plantar side of a hind paw and formalin-induced pain behaviors were assessed.
To induce persistent inflammatory pain, CFA (100 μl, 1 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis) solution was injected into the plantar side of one hind paw. Our previous studies showed that CFA-induced thermal pain hypersensitivity reaches a peak level at 6 h and persists for at least 24 h post-injection.22 We chose these two time points for the pharmacologic and behavioral studies. At 6 h and 24 h after CFA injection, we intrathecally injected saline (10 μl; n = 5/time point) or TBOA (1, 5, or 10 μg/10 μl; n = 5/dose/time point) followed by 10 μl of saline to flush the catheter. Thermal testing was carried out 1 day before CFA injection (baseline) and at 20 min after saline or TBOA administration. Paw withdrawal response to thermal stimulation was measured as described previously.14,18,19 Briefly, each rat was placed in a Plexiglas chamber on a glass plate above a light box. A beam of radiant heat from the apparatus (Model 336 Analgesia Meter, IITC Inc./Life Science Instruments, Woodland Hills, CA) was applied through a hole in the light box to the middle of the plantar surface of each hind paw through the glass plate. When the rat lifted its foot the light beam automatically shut off. The length of time between the start of the light beam and the foot lift was defined as the paw withdrawal latency. Each trial was repeated five times at 5-min intervals for each side. A cut-off time of 20 s was used to avoid tissue damage to the paw.
To examine the role of group III mGluRs in the antinociceptive effect produced by intrathecal TBOA in the CFA model, we intrathecally injected the rats with saline (10 μl; n = 5), MSOP (10 μg/10 μl; n = 5), TBOA (10 μg/10 μl; n = 5), or MSOP plus TBOA (n = 5) at 6 h post-CFA and then measured paw withdrawal latencies.
To examine whether the glutamate transporter inhibitors used in behavioral testing affected locomotor function, three reflexes (placing, grasping, and righting) were tested as described previously.14,18,21,22 In brief, naïve animals received a 10-μl intrathecal injection of saline (10 μl; n = 5), DL-THA (15 μg/10 μl; n = 5), dihydrokainate (20 μg/10 μl; n = 5), or TBOA (10 μg/10 μl; n = 5). Twenty minutes later, an experimenter blind to drug treatment tested the rats for placing, grasping, and righting reflexes as published previously.14,18,21,22 Scores for each reflex were based on counts of each normal reflex exhibited in five trials. In addition, the rats’ general behaviors, including spontaneous activity (e.g., walking and running), were observed.
Total RNA from the spinal cord, dorsal root ganglion (DRG), hippocampus, and cortex of rats (n = 2) was extracted by the Trizol method (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), precipitated with isopropanol, and treated with DNase I (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). The quality and quantity of RNA samples were assessed by using a NanoDrop 1000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Midland, ON, Canada). First-strand complementary DNA was synthesized from total RNA with the Omniscript RT kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). Template (1 μl) was amplified by PCR with platinum Taq polymerase (1 unit) in 20 μl of total reaction volume containing 0.5 μmol of each specific PCR primer. The primer sequences were chosen from the conserved part of the coding region for GLAST [5′–GAAAGATAAAATATGCAAAAAGCAAC–3′ (forward) and 5′–GTTGCTTTTTTGTCATATTTTATCTTTC–3′ (reverse)] and for GLT-1 [5′–ATCAACCGAGGGTGTGCCAACAATAT–3′ (forward) and 5′–ATATTGTTGGCACCCTCGGTTGAT–3′ (reverse)]. As a loading control, β-actin complementary DNA was also amplified with primer sequences 5 ′-TCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTACGA-3′ (forward) and 5 ′-GGATGCCACAGGATTCCATACCCA-3′ (reverse). PCR amplification was carried out for 30 cycles consisting of 20 s at 94°C, 20 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C. After amplification, the products were separated on a 1.2% agarose gel containing 0.025% ethidium bromide. Bands were then visualized under ultraviolet illumination, and gels were photographed with the BioDoc-It imaging system (Ultra-Violet Products Ltd, Upland, CA).
The rats (n = 20; 10 for formalin and saline and 10 for CFA and saline) were sacrificed by decapitation, and the dorsal and ventral tissues of the lumbar enlargement segments and DRG were dissected, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C. Soluble proteins were prepared according to procedures described previously.18–21 In brief, frozen tissues were homogenized in homogenization buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 μM leupeptin, 2 μM pepstain A). The crude homogenate was centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min at 3,000g. The supernatant was collected, and the pellet (nuclei and debris fraction) discarded. After protein concentration was measured, the samples were heated for 5 min at 98°C and loaded onto 4% stacking/7.5% separating sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels for protein separation. The protein was then electrophoretically transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 3% non-fat dry milk and subsequently incubated for 2 h with polyclonal rabbit primary antibody for GLAST (0.05 μg/ml), EAAC1 (0.06 μg/ml), or GLT-1 (0.05 μg/ml). All antibodies were provided by Jeffery D. Rothstein, M.D., at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA (September 10, 2005). Their specificity and selectivity have been reported previously.8,11,23–25 β-actin (monoclonal mouse primary antibody against β-actin, 0.2 μg/ml, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was used as a loading control. The proteins were detected by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies and visualized with chemiluminescence reagents provided with the ECL kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) and exposure to film. The intensity of blots was quantified with densitometry.
Rats (n = 3) were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4). The L4–5 spinal cord segments and DRG were harvested, post-fixed in the same fixative solution for 2–4 h, cryoprotected by immersion in 30% sucrose overnight at 4°C, and frozen-sectioned at 25 μm. The sections were blocked for 1 h at 37°C in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline containing 10% normal goat serum plus 0.3% Triton X-100. The sections were incubated in primary rabbit antibody for GLAST (1:500), EAAC1 (1:1,000), or GLT-1 (1:1,000) for 48 h at 4°C. The sections were finally incubated in biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 1 h at 37°C followed by avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (1:100; Vector Laboratories) for 1 h at 37°C. The immune reaction product was visualized by catalysis of 3,3-diaminobenzidine by horseradish peroxidase in the presence of 0.01% H2O2.
Post-embedding immunogold labeling was carried out as described previously.19,26 Briefly, animals (n = 2) were perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde + 0.5% glutaraldehyde. Cryoprotected sections from the L5 superficial dorsal horns were frozen in a Leica cryopreparation chamber (Vienna, Austria) and freeze-substituted into Lowicryl HM-20 in a Leica automatic freeze substitution instrument. Ultrathin sections were labeled with polyclonal rabbit antibody for EAAC1, GLAST, and GLT-1. The sections were also double labeled with polyclonal rabbit antibody for EAAC1 and monoclonal mouse antibody for calcitonin gene-related peptide. Control experiments for specificity and selectivity of these antibodies were carried out as described previously.8,11,23–25 Areas for study were selected at random from the superficial dorsal horn at low magnification (i.e., synapses not visible), and then micrographs of synapses were taken at high magnification.
Naïve rats (n = 5) and rats that had undergone the behavioral testing were deeply anesthetized and perfused transcardially with 100 ml of 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) followed by 300 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The lumbar enlargement segments and thymus (as a positive control) were harvested, post-fixed at 4°C for 4 h and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose overnight. The transverse sections (25 μm) were cut on a cryostat, and two sets of sections were collected. TUNEL histochemical staining was carried out on one set of sections with an in situ cell death detection kit (Roche Molecular Biochemical, Indianapolis, IN). Briefly, the sections were incubated with proteinase K solution (20 μg/ml) for 20 min at room temperature, and then with a TUNEL reaction mixture composed of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase at 37°C in a humidified chamber. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase enzyme-incorporated fluorescein was detected with converter-alkaline phosphatase consisting of sheep anti-fluorescein antibody conjugated with phosphatase. The signal was detected by using nitroblue tetrazolium chloride/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate as color substrates. Another set of sections was stained with cresyl violet. The sections were rinsed in distilled water and incubated for 30 min in a solution of 0.2% cresyl violet (cresyl violet acetate; Sigma) in acetate buffer, washed in distilled water, dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol, and coverslipped.
The glutamate uptake activity was measured according to a previously published method with minor modification.13,27,28 In brief, animals (n = 20; 10 for formalin and saline and 10 for CFA and saline) were killed by exposure to carbon dioxide, and fresh tissue samples from the L4 and L5 spinal dorsal horns were removed as quickly as possible by laminectomy. Dorsal horns ipsilateral and contralateral to formalin or CFA injection were homogenized separately in an ice-cold buffer solution containing: 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.32 M sucrose, 5 μg/ml pepstatin, 5 μg/ml aprotinin, 20 μg/ml trypsin inhibitor, 4 μg/ml leupeptin, and 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline. The homogenates were centrifuged at 1,000g for 20 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected. The remaining pellets were resuspended by using the same buffer solution and recentrifuged at 1,000g for 20 min at 4°C. The two supernatants were combined and centrifuged again at 25,000g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting synaptosomal pellets, which contain both neuronal and glial glutamate transporters,29,30 were suspended in Krebs solutions with or without Na+. The glutamate uptake activity was determined by incubating the synaptosome preparation with a solution containing [3H] L-glutamate (0.4 μCi/mmol; Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) at 37°C for 4 min. The reaction was terminated by filtering the synaptosomes through a Whatman GF/B filter (Maidstone, United Kingdom) presoaked in the same buffer solution. Then the filter was transferred to a vial containing scintillation cocktail. The radioactivity in the final samples was measured by a liquid scintillation counter.
The behavioral data were statistically assessed by one-way analysis of variance. Intergroup differences were analyzed by Tukey’s test. Western blot, histological, and glutamate uptake data were statistically assessed by paired Student’s t-test to compare the saline-treated (or naïve) and formalin- or CFA-treated groups. Locomotor data were assessed by a rank sum test. All statistical analyses were performed using a statistical software package (SigmaPlot/SigmaStat, Systat, Port Richmond, CA). All statistical tests were two-tailed with a significance level of P < 0.05. Data are reported as mean ± standard error.
We have previously shown expression of EAAC1 messenger RNA and protein in DRG neurons and their central terminals.6,11 Consistent with those findings, we observed EAAC1-positive cells in the DRG, mostly in small cells (Fig. 1A). In spinal cord, EAAC1 immunoreactivity was distributed predominantly in the superficial dorsal horn (Fig. 1B). Under electron microscopy, the immunogold labeling for EAAC1 was associated with postsynaptic membrane, presynaptic membrane, and the extrasynaptic membrane of the axonal terminals and postsynaptic dendrites in the superficial dorsal horn (Fig. 1Ca–c). These synaptic contacts were asymmetrical (Fig. 1Ca–c). To further identify whether EAAC1 was localized in the primary afferent terminals, we used calcitonin gene-related peptide as a marker for nociceptive afferent terminals.31,32 Double immunogold labeling revealed that EAAC1 was co-localized with calcitonin gene-related peptide in the axons and terminals in the superficial dorsal horn (Fig. 1Cd–e). These axons and terminals contained numerous clear vesicles and a few dense core ones (Fig. 1Cd–e).
We also examined expression and distribution of GLAST and GLT-1 in the DRG and spinal cord. Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis revealed GLAST messenger RNA expression in the DRG, spinal cord, hippocampus, and cortex of adult rats, whereas GLT-1 messenger RNA was expressed in spinal cord, hippocampus, and cortex, but not in the DRG (Fig. 2A). PCR products of the sizes predicted from the corresponding complementary DNA sequences were detected. Nucleotide sequence analysis by automatic DNA sequencing verified that the PCR products corresponded to the complementary DNA sequences. GLAST and GLT-1 protein expression was strong in dorsal horn and weak in ventral horn but was undetectable in the DRG (Fig. 2B). Consistently, immunohistochemical experiments showed GLAST and GLT-1 immunoreactivity to be concentrated in the superficial dorsal horn (Figs. 2C and 2D). Under electron microcopy, immunogold labeling for GLT-1 appeared to label glia exclusively and abundantly in the superficial dorsal horn (Fig. 2E). Immunogold labeling for GLAST was prominent among glial filaments and in glial membranes in the superficial dorsal horn (Fig. 2F). These GLT-1- and GLAST-labeled glial leaflets surround dendritic spines and the dendritic and/or axonal elements of asymmetrical axo-dendritic synapses (Figs. 2E and 2F).
To demonstrate the role of spinal glutamate transporters in inflammatory pain, we first examined the effect of intrathecal glutamate transporter activator MS-153 on formalin-induced pain behaviors during the first and second phases. MS-153 has been reported to accelerate glutamate uptake in in vitro and in vivo studies.33–39 One-way ANOVA analysis showed that MS-153 at the doses of 10, 100, and 1,000 μg did not significantly change the number of formalin-evoked flinches and shakes in either phase compared to that in the saline group (F3,21 = 0.21, P = 0.89 in the first phase; F3,21 = 0.49, P = 0.69 in the second phase; Fig. 3A).
Next, we tested the effect of spinal glutamate transporter inhibition on formalin-induced pain behaviors. When the glutamate transporter inhibitor TBOA was given intrathecally 10 min before formalin injection, it produced a significant decrease in formalin-induced pain behaviors in the second phase (F3,36 = 7.81, P < 0.001; Fig. 3B), but not in the first phase (F3,36 = 1.92, P = 0.144; Fig. 3B). Five micrograms of TBOA reduced the number of formalin-evoked flinches and shakes by 35% (P = 0.02), and 10 μg reduced the number by 45% (P = 0.02) compared to the value in the saline-treated group. A 1-μg dose of TBOA did not influence the formalin response in either phase (P = 0.38). We did not observe any remarkable pain behaviors on the contralateral side during the formalin test. To further confirm the antinociceptive action of glutamate transporter inhibition, two other glutamate transporter inhibitors, dihydrokainate and DL-THA, were used. Similar to TBOA, both dihydrokainate (F3,27 = 12.05, P < 0.001; Fig. 3C) and DL-THA (F3,24 = 15.22, P < 0.001; Fig. 3D) dramatically and dose-dependently decreased pain behaviors in the second phase of the formalin test.
We also examined the effect of spinal glutamate transporter inhibition on CFA-induced persistent inflammatory pain. Consistent with previous studies,18,19,22 subcutaneous injection of CFA into a hind paw induced significant thermal hyperalgesia at 6 h (Fig. 4A) and 24 h (Fig. 4B) post-injection in saline-treated groups on the ipsilateral side. TBOA administered intrathecally significantly reduced CFA-induced thermal hyperalgesia at both 6 h (F3,16 = 24.99, P < 0.001; Fig. 4A) and 24 h (F3,16 = 37.68, P < 0.001; Fig. 4B). Compared to the value of the saline-treated group, TBOA blocked CFA-induced decreases in paw withdrawal latency by 34% at the 5-μg dose (P = 0.03) and by 57% at the 10-μg dose (P = 0.009) at 6 h and by 29% at the 5-μg dose (P = 0.035) and by 37% at the 10-μg dose (P = 0.02) at 24 h. A 1-μg dose of TBOA had no effect at either time point (P = 0.6 at 6 h and P = 0.8 at 24 h). No dose of TBOA influenced basal paw withdrawal response to thermal stimulation on the contralateral side (F3,16 = 0.52, P = 0.78; Fig. 4A; F3,16 = 0.49, P = 0.91; Fig. 4B).
To exclude the possibility that the antinociceptive effects of glutamate transporter inhibitors described in behavioral testing were caused by impaired motor functions, we examined the effects of TBOA, DL-THA, and dihydrokainate on locomotor functions in naive animals. As indicated in Table 1, at the doses used, none of the inhibitors significantly altered placing, grasping, or righting reflexes. In addition, no significant differences were observed in the rats’ general behaviors (such as walking and running) between the saline-treated and the inhibitor-treated groups.
To further elucidate how spinal glutamate transporter inhibition caused antinociception in inflammatory pain, we examined uptake activity and expression of spinal glutamate transporters 1 h post-formalin and 6 h post-CFA. Spinal synaptosome preparations from the ipsilateral and contralateral L4-L5 dorsal horn samples were used to assess glutamate uptake activity. Saline injection did not affect basal glutamate uptake activity as compared with that of naive rats (data not shown). Analysis by paired Student’s t-test showed that glutamate uptake activity in the ipsilateral dorsal horn was decreased by 29% 1 h after formalin injection (t = 2.62, P = 0.04; Fig. 5A) and by 79% 6 h after CFA injection (t = 6.41, P < 0.001; Fig. 5B) compared with their respective controls. Interestingly, 6 h after CFA injection, spinal glutamate uptake activity on the contralateral side was increased by 1.5-fold compared to that of the corresponding saline group (t = 2.94, P = 0.026; Fig. 5B). The level of glutamate uptake activity was increased on the contralateral side 1 h after formalin injection, but the difference was not statistically significant (t = 1.70, P = 0.14; Fig. 5A). Western blot analysis showed that the amounts of total GLAST, EAAC1, and GLT-1 proteins in the ipsilateral and contralateral dorsal horn 1 h post-formalin (Figs. 5C and 5D) and 6 h post-CFA (Figs. 5E and 5F) were similar to those in corresponding saline groups. In addition, neither formalin nor CFA injection changed basal glutamate uptake activity or EAAC1 expression in the ipsilateral L4-L5 DRGs compared to saline treatment (data not shown).
Glutamate transporter inhibition may increase extracellular glutamate concentration and produce neurotoxicity, thereby destroying the relevant dorsal horn neurons and interfering with the transmission of pain signaling. To determine whether neuronal damage was associated with intrathecal injection of glutamate transporter inhibitors during inflammatory pain, we used the TUNEL technique to examine whether 10 μg/μl TBOA produced apoptosis in spinal cord in the formalin and CFA models. We used thymus as a positive control because it normally expresses many apoptosis-positive cells.14,40 Naïve rats were used as negative controls. As expected, naïve rats displayed many TUNEL-positive cells in thymus (Fig. 6A), but not in spinal cord (data not shown). We did not detect any TUNEL-positive neurons in the spinal cord of rats after intrathecal administration of 10 μg TBOA in either the formalin (Fig. 6B) or CFA (Fig. 6C) model. Furthermore, cresyl violet staining revealed that spinal cord neurons from TBOA-treated rats were normal, without pathologic changes, at 1 h after formalin injection (Fig. 7A) and at 6 h after CFA injection (Fig. 7B). The number of cresyl-violet-stained cells in these two groups of rats was unchanged compared to that of the naïve rats (Fig. 7C).
Group III mGluRs are expressed in primary afferent terminals in the dorsal horn,41,42 and their activation reduces glutamate release from the primary afferent terminals.4,5,43 To determine whether group III mGluRs participate in the antinociception caused by spinal glutamate transporter inhibition, we examined the effect of intrathecal MSOP, a group III mGluR antagonist, on TBOA-produced antinociception in the formalin and CFA models. We found that TBOA-induced antinociceptive effects were significantly blocked by intrathecal co-administration of MSOP (second phase of formalin model: F3,16 = 30.96, P < 0.001; CFA model: F3,16 = 30.77, P < 0.001). As expected, intrathecal TBOA (10 μg) reduced the number of formalin-induced flinches and shakes by 47% of the value in the saline-treated group in the second phase (P < 0.001; Fig. 8A) and blocked the CFA-induced decrease in ipsilateral paw withdrawal latency by 60% of the value in the saline-treated group (P = 0.01; Fig. 8B). The number of formalin-induced flinches in the second phase in the group treated with MSOP and TBOA was increased by 56% (P = 0.04; Fig. 8A) of the value in the TBOA-treated group. CFA-induced paw withdrawal latency in the group treated with MSOP and TBOA was decreased by 86% (P = 0.03; Fig. 8B) of the value in the TBOA-treated group. MSOP (10 μg) alone did not affect formalin-induced pain behaviors in either phase (P = 0.73; Fig. 8A) or CFA-induced thermal hyperalgesia (P = 0.65; Fig. 8B). It also had no effect on contralateral-side basal paw withdrawal (Fig. 8B).
Three glutamate transporters, EAAC1, GLT-1, and GLAST, have been found in the spinal cord.6,8,11–13 They are expressed most densely in the superficial dorsal horn, which is the primary center of nociceptive processing. However, their localization and distribution at synaptic and non-synaptic sites has not been reported. Our study provides evidence that EAAC1 is present in dorsal horn neurons and axonal terminals at both synaptic and non-synaptic sites and in nociceptive primary afferents. In line with the present observation, we previously showed that EAAC1 co-localized with calcitonin gene-related peptide and isolectin B4 in the dorsal root ganglion neurons and that EAAC1 immunoreactivity in the superficial dorsal horn was reduced on the side ipsilateral to the dorsal rhizotomy.11 In contrast to EAAC1, GLT-1 and GLAST proteins were not detected in the dorsal root ganglion, although GLAST messenger RNA was observed in this region. Under electron microscopy, GLT-1 and GLAST were abundantly distributed in glial cells at perisynaptic sites in the superficial dorsal horn. This finding is consistent with a recent report that showed co-localization of GLT-1 and GLAST with both glial fibrillary acidic protein (a marker of astrocytes) and OX-42 (a marker of microglia) in the dorsal horn.44 Thus, our findings provide a new morphologic basis for the functional role of spinal glutamate transporters in normal sensory transmission and pathologic pain (including inflammatory pain).
We and others have reported that intrathecal injection of glutamate transporter inhibitors produces hyperactivity of dorsal horn neurons, spontaneous nociceptive behaviors, and thermal and mechanical pain hypersensitivities in naïve animals.14,15 Based on these pronociceptive effects, it is reasonable to infer that enhancing spinal glutamate transporter uptake activity might produce antinociception in pathological conditions. Unexpectedly, however, glutamate transporter activator MS-15333–39 had no effect on formalin-induced pain behaviors, even at the highest dose (1,000 μg). In contrast, intrathecal administration of three different glutamate transporter inhibitors, TBOA, dihydrokainate, and DL-THA, significantly blocked formalin-induced nociceptive behaviors in the second phase. Intrathecal TBOA also attenuated CFA-induced thermal hyperalgesia. Consistent with these results, Niederberger et al.12,17 reported that pharmacologic inhibition of spinal glutamate transporter with L-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylate or transient knockdown of GLT-1 and GLAST decreased the number of formalin-induced flinches. Interestingly, intrathecal administration of riluzole, a glutamate transporter activator, resulted in antinociception in rat neuropathic pain.13 This controversial result might be attributed to the fact that riluzole has a number of other effects, such as blocking sodium channels, glutamate receptors, and γ-aminobutyric acid uptake.45 In a clinical study, riluzole was ineffective against peripheral neuropathic pain.46 Although dihydrokainate and DL-THA used in the present study might act as agonists or antagonists at glutamate receptors, TBOA is the most potent competitive blocker of glutamate transporters and did not show any significant effects on either the ionotropic or metabotropic glutamate receptors.16,35,47–49 Thus, the reduced pain-related behaviors that we observed (at least those caused by TBOA) cannot be explained by direct interaction between glutamate transporter blockers and glutamate receptors.
Here, we examined potential mechanisms by which glutamate transporter inhibitors might have antinociceptive effects on inflammatory pain. We first demonstrated that all rats treated with TBOA, DL-THA, and dihydrokainate displayed normal placing, grasping, and righting reflexes, indicating that the antinociception cannot be attributed to impaired motor functions. We further found that spinal glutamate transporter uptake activity was significantly reduced on the ipsilateral side 6 h after CFA injection and 1 h after formalin injection. A similar reduction in glutamate transport activity was reported in the dorsal horn ipsilateral to peripheral nerve injury.13,50 It is unclear how inflammatory and neuropathic inputs cause a reduction in spinal glutamate uptake. Although neither CFA nor formalin altered total expression of spinal glutamate transporter proteins, peripheral noxious insults might reduce plasma membrane expression of spinal glutamate transporters, a possibility that remains to be confirmed.
Reduction of spinal glutamate transporter uptake may elevate glutamate concentration in the synaptic cleft and non-synaptic extracellular space and contribute to the development and maintenance of inflammatory and neuropathic pain.6,13 It is possible that in our study, MS-153 was unable to effectively activate impaired spinal glutamate transporters to clear synaptic glutamate accumulation under inflammatory pain conditions. Interestingly, contralateral spinal glutamate transporter uptake activity increased to varying extents after CFA and formalin injection. The relevance of this increase is unknown but might be an attempt to compensate for the reduction in glutamate transporter uptake on the ipsilateral side to clear excess glutamate.
One might expect that under inflammatory pain conditions, intrathecal administration of glutamate transporter inhibitors would further block clearance of glutamate and enhance the increases in synaptic and non-synaptic extracellular glutamate in the dorsal horn. This enhancement might cause excitotoxicity, destroying susceptible dorsal horn neurons and interfering with transmission of dorsal horn nociceptive information.6 However, transient treatment with TBOA did not induce any detectable spinal neuronal damage in rats subjected to the formalin or CFA model. This finding suggests that the antinociceptive effect of spinal glutamate transporter inhibition is not a result of dorsal horn neuronal excitotoxicity. Importantly, we found that intrathecal co-administration of MSOP blocked the TBOA-produced antinociceptive effect in both pain models, suggesting the involvement of spinal inhibitory presynaptic group III mGluRs. Spinal group III mGluRs are activated under pathologic pain conditions, but not under normal conditions.4,5 If spinal glutamate transporter inhibition enhances the activation of inhibitory presynaptic group III mGluRs, it would limit further glutamate release from primary afferents and result in an antinociceptive effect in inflammatory pain.6 This possibility is supported by a previous experiment in which inhibition of spinal glutamate uptake decreased evoked postsynaptic excitatory potentials of dorsal horn neurons in inflammatory pain; the decrease was reversible by a group III mGluR antagonist.51 Inhibition of glutamate uptake has also been reported to decrease synaptic release of glutamate.48
It is noteworthy that intrathecal MSOP did not completely reverse the antinociceptive effect of TBOA, suggesting that other potential mechanisms might exist. Glutamate transporter uptake function is dependent on the membrane potential and the transmembrane ion gradients established by the Na+-K+ pump. Under inflammatory pain conditions, hyperactive dorsal horn neurons and glial cells might consume large amounts of cellular energy, disturb energy metabolism, and result in energy insufficiency.6 Such insufficiency might impair the Na+-K+ pump and reverse glutamate transporter operation. Indeed, during brain ischemia, glutamate transporter operation was reversed, causing glutamate release due to ATP depletion.49 TBOA reduced glutamate release and had neuroprotective actions in brain ischemia.49 We previously reported that ischemia-stimulating medium reversed the operation of glutamate transporters of dorsal horn neurons in vitro, causing glutamate to be released.52 Thus, it is possible that the antinociceptive effect of glutamate transporter inhibitors might also be the result of the blockade of reversed transport and consequent release of glutamate in dorsal horn.6 However, direct evidence regarding reversed operation of spinal glutamate transporters in inflammatory pain in vivo is lacking and remains to be further confirmed. In addition, other potential mechanisms, such as postsynaptic desensitization of dorsal horn glutamate receptors and disturbance of the glutamate/glutamine cycle in spinal glial cells might also contribute to the role of spinal glutamate transporter inhibitors in inflammatory pain.6
In summary, here we have ascertained the synaptic and non-synaptic localization and distribution of EAAC1, GLT-1, and GLAST in the superficial dorsal horn. In addition, behavioral studies showed that spinal glutamate transporter inhibition produces an antinociceptive effect in formalin- and CFA-induced inflammatory pain. This effect was attenuated by a group III mGluR antagonist. Our findings suggest that spinal glutamate transporter inhibition can relieve inflammatory pain through a mechanism that involves the activation of inhibitory pre-synaptic group III mGluRs.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01NS058886), Bethesda, Maryland, USA; the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30828015), Beijing, People’s Republic of China; the Blaustein Pain Research Fund, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Mr. David Koch and the Patrick C. Walsh Prostate Cancer Research Fund, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; and the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
We thank Ya-Xian Wang, M.D., Laboratory of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, for her help with the immunogold experiments and Claire Levine, M.S., E.L.S., Manager of Editorial Services, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, for her editorial assistance.
This work was received from the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Summary statement: Spinal cord glutamate transporters clear synaptically released glutamate to maintain normal sensory transmission. This study shows that spinal cord glutamate transporter inhibition relieves inflammatory pain by activating inhibitory pre-synaptic group III metabotropic glutamate receptors.