PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC Mar 15, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3057141
NIHMSID: NIHMS271647
The Fusogen EFF-1 Controls Sculpting of Mechanosensory Dendrites
Meital Oren-Suissa,1 David H. Hall,2 Millet Treinin,3 Gidi Shemer,1* and Benjamin Podbilewicz1
1 Department of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
2 Center for C. elegans Anatomy, Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
3 Department of Physiology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
To whom correspondence should be addressed. podbilew/at/tx.technion.ac.il (B.P.), ishemer/at/email.unc.edu (G.S.)
*Present address: Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
The mechanisms controlling the formation and maintenance of neuronal trees are poorly understood. We examined the dynamic development of two arborized mechanoreceptor neurons (PVDs) required for reception of strong mechanical stimuli in Caenorhabditis elegans. The PVDs elaborated dendritic trees comprising structural units we call “menorahs.” We studied how the number, structure, and function of menorahs were maintained. EFF-1, an essential protein mediating cell fusion, acted autonomously in the PVDs to trim developing menorahs. eff-1 mutants displayed hyperbranched, disorganized menorahs. Overexpression of EFF-1 in the PVD reduced branching. Neuronal pruning appeared to involve EFF-1–dependent branch retraction and neurite-neurite autofusion. Thus, EFF-1 activities may act as a quality control mechanism during the sculpting of dendritic trees.
Morphologies of dendritic trees vary from one neuronal type to another, and the pattern of these arbors determines the manner in which a neuron processes its synaptic or sensory input. However, little is known regarding the mechanisms controlling the outgrowth and maintenance of dendritic trees (14). Two mechano-receptors in Caenorhabditis elegans (PVDR and PVDL; right and left, respectively) are responsible for an avoidance response triggered by strong mechanical stimuli to the body (5). The complete neural system of C. elegans has been considered to comprise only simple-patterned neurons (6). However, recent studies show that the PVDs have a more complex morphology (7, 8).
Here, we established a genetic system to dissect the mechanisms of branch generation and plasticity of arborized neurons in C. elegans. To determine branching patterns, we imaged transgenic animals expressing cytoplasmic ser-2p::GFP (green fluorescent protein) or plasma membrane DES-2::GFP in the PVDs (table S1). The PVDs contained repetitive structural units reminiscent of multibranched candelabras or menorahs (Fig. 1A). Although the number of menorah branches varied, the menorahs appeared to develop in a stepwise manner from the L2 larva to the adult (fig. S1). The stereotypical menorah structure is likely to form a functional unit necessary for the PVDs mechanosensory activities.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PVD menorah sculpting by EFF-1. “c” denotes cell body, small droplets are autofluorescent gut granules, anterior is left, and dorsal is up. (A) Full stereotypic arborization pattern in young adult. (B) PVD in eff-1(hy21) showing disorganized (more ...)
Mutations in the cell fusion gene eff-1 (9, 10) affected the pattern of PVDs arborization, resulting in disorganized and hyperbranched phenotypes (Fig. 1B). Moreover, eff-1(ok1021) mutant animals showed reduced sensitivity to strong mechanical stimuli (53%, n = 106) (11). To characterize menorah disorganization in eff-1 mutants, we quantified the number of processes at different degrees of the branching order (primary to senary branches; Fig. 1C and fig. S2). The frequency of secondary and tertiary branching was doubled in the eff-1(hy21) mutant compared with wild type. The eff-1(hy21) mutant had a strong branching phenotype, whereas the oj55 mutant displayed a weaker effect, correlating with their respective epithelial fusion-defective phenotype (figs. S2 and S5). In wild-type menorahs, most sprouting of branches and bending of tertiary processes occurred at right angles to the branches of origin (Fig. 1A). In contrast, eff-1(hy21) mutant menorahs showed varying branching angles (Fig. 1B). We observed in the mutant a 10-fold increase in the number of branches sprouting from the secondary branch (Fig. 1D) and a 20-fold increase in the number of branches that erred and turned back 180° (Fig. 1E). These phenotypes suggest that EFF-1 sculpts and maintains right-angle nonoverlapping branches.
Cell-specific expression of eff-1 in the PVDs (des-2p::eff-1) partially rescued neuronal eff-1 phenotypes (Fig. 2C). In contrast, PVD patterning defects were not rescued by expression of eff-1 in the neighboring epidermal tissue (fig. S3; dpy-7p::eff-1). In eff-1(hy21) mutants expressing eff-1 in both neural and epidermal tissues (des-2p::eff-1+dpy-7p::eff-1), the rescue was not significantly stronger than the rescue observed with only the PVD-specific des-2p::eff-1 (fig. S3). These rescue experiments, together with expression of EFF-1::GFP in the PVDs (fig. S4), provide evidence that eff-1 controls branching cell autonomously. Moreover, eff-1 overexpression in the PVDs of wild-type animals reduced branching (Fig. 2D). The remaining branches were organized in a gradient starting from the cell body toward the head and tail, where no branches could be observed. Thus, eff-1 may play a role in mechanosensory neurons restricting branching in a dosage-dependent manner to produce dendrite simplification (Fig. 2G).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
EFF-1 autonomously rescues PVD arborization and restricts branching. (A) eff-1(hy21) at 25°C had twice as many secondary and tertiary branches as the wild type. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (B) Menorahs in wild-type animals. (C) Expression (more ...)
The absence of excess branching in wild-type animals may reflect a situation where only the appropriate branches initiate outgrowth. Alternatively, an excess of branches may be generated and extended but at some later point undergo retraction, pruning, or fusion to repair branching errors. To determine how EFF-1 restricts branching, we followed the behavior of branches by using three-dimensional (3D) live-imaging confocal microscopy in wild-type animals overexpressing des-2p::eff-1. The tips of tertiary to senary menorah branches first contacted the muscle cells, and then the dendrites detached from the menorahs by fission events (Fig. 3A; arrowheads) causing spontaneous dendrite break-off (Fig. 3B; arrowheads). Thus, following dynamic outgrowth, fission events eliminate extra branches.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dendrite autofusion and fission trim menorahs. Scale bars represent 5 μm, (A) and (B); 20 μm and insets 5 μm, (C); and 0.5 μm, (D). (A) Trimming of dendrites that break off (arrows) and fission of branches in des-2p::EFF (more ...)
To further analyze eff-1–dependent remodeling of menorahs, we grew the eff-1(hy21ts) worms at the restrictive temperature and shifted them to the permissive temperature in the early L4 stage. The defective arborization pattern was static at the nonpermissive temperature. Four hours after down-shifting to the permissive temperature, we observed branches that met, touched, and retracted. Some branches appeared to be stably connected, forming loops of different sizes and shapes (43 stable loops, n = 18; fig. S6). Because EFF-1 is a fusogen, we hypothesized that transient meeting and attachment of branches expressing EFF-1 may have resulted in loop formation because of interbranch fusion. To distinguish between interbranch fasciculation and fusion, we analyzed the 3D structure of the loops by generating confocal z stacks, projections, and rotations. The loops were stably connected over time (55 loops, n = 18 animals; movie S1). Next, we imaged DES-2::GFP in loops and found that fluorescent particles moved freely through them. To test whether the loops resulted from eff-1 activity, we incubated temperature-sensitive mutants at the restrictive temperature to generate hyperbranching, then we shifted them to the permissive temperature to induce expression of active EFF-1. After generating loops for 3.5 hours, we upshifted the worms back to the restrictive temperature to stabilize the loops (fig. S8). We obtained a two- to threefold increase in the number of loops (119 stable loops in n = 16 animals; Fig. 3C). We also observed symmetric fluorescence recovery of photobleached areas within the loops (fig. S7 and movie S2), indicating that the loops are continuous. Thus, eff-1 induces loop formation by neurite autofusion and/or fasciculation.
To further demonstrate that neurites can fuse with each other, we turned to higher resolution images of menorah branches and membranes. By using archival serial section transmission electron micrographs [TEMs (6)], we identified arborizations derived from the PVDs. In transverse sections of an adult hermaphrodite (N2U), 30- to 80-nm-diameter branches sandwiched between the body wall muscles and the hypodermis were observed (Fig. 3D, arrowheads). We reconstructed parallel neurites corresponding to the quaternary branches of a menorah from serial sections (Fig. 3E and figs. S9 to S11). In 10 examples of PVDs and FLPL/R (highly arborized neurons anterior to the PVDs), we found 2 to 12 branches fusing at the midline and forming fused longitudinal processes (Fig. 3, D and E, arrows). In no cases did we observe distal dendrites fasciculate; instead these fused if they reached one another. Thus, neurite-neurite auto-fusion plays a role in PVD and FLP arborization.
In addition to loop formation, dendrites were highly dynamic, erring, growing, and retracting in wild-type worms (Fig. 4A and movie S3). PVDs overexpressing eff-1 showed similar retractions but, unlike in the wild type, showed limited branch growth (Fig. 4, B and C). Similarly, when eff-1(hy21ts) animals were downshifted from the restrictive to the permissive temperature, we observed a 20-fold increase in the number of retracting branches and a 5-fold reduction in branch growth compared with eff-1 mutants at 25°C (Fig. 4, D to G, and movie S1). In contrast, upshifting eff-1(hy21ts) worms resulted in excess neurite growth (Fig. 4F). Thus, we propose a model in which EFF-1 autonomously induces retraction of branches to simplify menorahs.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
EFF-1–dependent retraction of branches. (A, B, D, and E) Time-lapse confocal projections of L4 and young-adult animals. (A) Growth of a wild-type menorah (movie S3). Growing tertiary branches (arrows). (B) Retraction of branches in des-2p::EFF (more ...)
EFF-1 is both a sculptor of epithelial organs by cell fusion (10) and a menorah sculptor by controlling dendrite bending, retraction, and fusion. The activities of this fusogen may be due to its ability to induce membrane curvature, a process that is thought to constitute a major driving force in membrane fusion and fission (1214). Proteins capable of bending membranes, such as atlastins (15, 16) and dynamins (17), can induce tubulation, fusion, and fission (12, 13). Three mechanistic principles may form and maintain branched tubes in the cytoplasm and in extracellular branched filopodia or neuronal arbors such as menorahs: first, assembly of specialized proteins on membranes; second, membranous tube formation involving growth and bifurcation of tubes; and third, membrane bending followed by membrane fusion and fission restricts excessive branching. How can EFF-1 control mechanistically different processes such as dendrite fusion and retraction? Different isoforms and interactions may account for diverse activities. For example, trans interactions between EFF-1 on dendrites will cause autofusion, whereas assembly of large EFF-1 complexes on dendrites may induce actin-mediated retraction.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Data
Acknowledgments
We thank A. Fire for vectors; N. Assaf and T. Gattegno for eff-1 alleles; E. Shmukler for preliminary phenotypic characterization of the PVD in eff-1(hy21ts); T. Stiernagle and the CGC for nematode strains; J. White and J. Hodgkin for donation of the MRC/LMB archival prints to DHH; C. Crocker for TEM cartoon; and O. Avinoam, D. Cassel, M. Kozlov, A. Sapir, and I. Yanai for critically reading the manuscript. Supported by grants from the FIRST program of the Israel Science Foundation (ISF 1542/07 to B.P.), ISF 493/01–16.6 to M.T., and NIH RR12596 (WormImage Web site) to D.H.H.
Footnotes
Note added in proof: After we submitted this report, Ghosh-Roy et al. (18) showed that axotomized PLM sensory neurons fail to re-connect in eff-1 mutants.
1. Scott EK, Luo L. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:359. [PubMed]
2. Grueber WB, Jan YN. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14:74. [PubMed]
3. Tobin DM, Bargmann CI. J Neurobiol. 2004;61:161. [PubMed]
4. Jinghong C, Guoxi T. Brain Res. 1999;846:243. [PubMed]
5. Way JC, Chalfie M. Genes Dev. 1989;3(12A):1823. [PubMed]
6. White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B. 1986;314:1. [PubMed]
7. Tsalik EL, et al. Dev Biol. 2003;263:81. [PubMed]
8. Halevi S, et al. EMBO J. 2002;21:1012. [PubMed]
9. Mohler WA, et al. Dev Cell. 2002;2:355. [PubMed]
10. Podbilewicz B, et al. Dev Cell. 2006;11:471. [PubMed]
11. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
12. Martens S, McMahon HT. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:543. [PubMed]
13. Chernomordik LV, Kozlov MM. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:175. [PubMed]
14. Sapir A, et al. Dev Cell. 2007;12:683. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Orso G, et al. Nature. 2009;460:978. [PubMed]
16. Hu J, et al. Cell. 2009;138:549. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Bashkirov PV, et al. Cell. 2008;135:1276. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Ghosh-Roy A, Wu Z, Goncharov A, Jin Y, Chisholm AD. J Neurosci. 2010;30:3175. [PMC free article] [PubMed]