|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
To report a case of subretinal leakage after focal laser treatment for idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy (ICSC). This rare complication was successfully treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT).
Interventional case report.
A 36-year-old male presented with ICSC in his right eye. After a period of observation without resolution, he was treated with focal laser. That treatment resulted in a massive exacerbation of his subretinal fluid. PDT was successfully used to treat the severe exacerbation with rapid resolution of the subretinal fluid, improvement in visual acuity, decreased leakage on fluorescein angiography, and reduction of subretinal fluid on ophthalmoscopic exam and by optical coherence tomography.
Ophthalmologists should consider the use of PDT in cases where focal laser causes an exacerbation of subretinal fluid in ICSC.
Idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy (ICSC) is a relatively common disorder of young or middle age individuals with abnormalities of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), resulting in focal areas of serous retinal detachment and pigment epithelial detachment . Fluorescein angiography often demonstrates focal areas of leakage at the level of the RPE with pooling of dye into the subretinal or sub-pigment epithelial space. In most cases the leakage resolves spontaneously with gradual return of good visual function. If there is chronic or recurrent leakage treatment may be indicated. In such cases, light focal laser photocoagulation to the area of RPE abnormality and leakage may be employed [2-5].
Here, we report a case of ICSC where focal laser photo-coagulation resulted in a dramatic increase in fluid leakage with severe worsening of the serous macular detachment. Subsequent treatment with photodynamic therapy (PDT) resulted in prompt resolution of the leakage and reduction of subretinal fluid.
A 36 year-old Caucasian male presented with two days of blurring of the central vision in the right eye with a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20-2. Four years ago, he had ICSC in the left eye that was successfully treated with reduced fluence PDT after an ineffective focal laser session.
Dilated fundus examination of the right eye disclosed an area of serous detachment in the superonasal macula extending toward the center of the fovea (Fig. 1A1A). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed the presence of subretinal fluid in the superonasal macula just sparing the foveal center (Fig. 1B1B). Fluorescein angiography showed a focal spot of leakage at the level of the RPE in the superonasal macula with pooling of dye into the area of subretinal fluid seen on ophthalmoscopy (Figs. 1C1C, DD). The fellow eye had a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and dilated fundus examination revealed RPE hyperpigmentation in the inferior foveal region without subretinal fluid.
A diagnosis of recurrent ICSC was made and options for treatment were discussed including: observation, focal laser photocoagulation, or PDT. After an initial observation period of three months without symptomatic or funduscopic change, a decision was made to treat with focal laser photocoagulation. Twelve 200 μm light-intensity laser spots were applied with an argon laser to the area of leakage utilizing 200-400 mW at 100 msec duration. Ten days later the patient returned having noted a dramatic worsening of vision. At this point, the visual acuity in the right eye measured 20/400 without correction and improved to 20/150 with a spherical correction of +0.75 diopters.
Repeat funduscopic examination disclosed a dramatic increase in subretinal fluid (Fig. 2A2A) that was confirmed by OCT (Fig. 2B2B). Fluorescein angiography showed a new area of leakage at the inferior edge of the laser scar (Figs. 2C2C, DD). Because of the increased leakage a decision was made to treat with PDT. Verteporfin 6 mg/m2 was administered intravenously and a 600 μm laser spot was applied to the area of leakage for 83 seconds at half-fluence. One week later visual acuity had improved to 20/60 without correction and the subretinal fluid had decreased in size both on exam and by OCT (Figs. 3A3A, BB). Furthermore, there was no longer leakage on fluorescein angiography (Figs. 3C3C, DD). At 3 months after PDT visual acuity recovered to 20/20. Funduscopic exam and OCT showed no subretinal fluid and FA continued to show no leakage (Fig. 44). The patient continues to do well without further recurrence of leakage at after 12 months of follow up.
Most cases of ICSC do not require any intervention and patients regain good visual function . Treatment is indicated in patients with recurrent leakage because multiple episodes of leakage can result in permanently reduced vision. The most common intervention is focal laser photocoagulation, which has been shown to enhance the resolution of leakage and absorption of subretinal fluid; however, the mechanism of action is poorly understood.
PDT with verteporfin has also been utilized for treatment of some cases of ICSC [6-10]. Due to the fact that there is relatively little data on the safety and efficacy of PDT in patients with ICSC, this treatment is usually reserved for cases that have not resolved spontaneously and either are not candidates for focal laser (due to poorly defined leakage or leakage too close to the center of the fovea) or have failed treatment with focal laser. The mechanism by which PDT reduces leakage in ICSC is also poorly understood; however, it may help to decrease the choroidal hyperpermeability that is the proposed pathogenetic mechanism of this disease and can be observed during indocyanine green angiography .
This case is unique in that focal laser photocoagulation resulted in no improvement in leakage four years prior in the patient’s left eye, and a dramatic worsening of leakage in the fellow eye described in this report. Focal laser treatment for ICSC has been reported to have some risk, including inadvertent treatment in the fovea and development of secondary choroidal neovascularization (CNV) at the laser scar [12, 13]. To the best of our knowledge the complication described here (dramatically increased subretinal fluid) has not been previously reported. It is highly unlikely that the increased fluid in our patient represented development of CNV because it occurred immediately after the laser treatment; however, it is unclear why laser treatment resulted in exacerbation of leakage. Fortunately, in both eyes of this patient, treatment with PDT resulted in rapid and complete resolution of macular leakage and serous detachment, although PDT has also been associated with the possible side effect of choroidal ischemia.
Most patients with ICSC never require intervention. In those that do require treatment focal laser photocoagulation will likely remain the most common treatment. However, PDT has been found to be effective in this disorder, and use of this treatment will likely increase. Specifically, one should consider the use of PDT in cases where there is increased leakage of subretinal fluid after focal laser treatment. Additionally, for patients with ICSC where focal laser was found to be unsuccessful in one eye, consideration should be given to using PDT as initial therapy if the fellow eye should it require treatment.
None of the authors has any commercial or financial conflicts with any of the materials or companies mentioned in this manuscript.
The material in this manuscript has not previously been presented elsewhere.