Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 March 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3051036

A Prospective Evaluation of C-reactive Protein Levels and Colorectal Adenoma Development



Inflammation is hypothesized to play a role in colorectal tumorigenesis. Circulating levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a serologic marker of the inflammatory response, have been positively associated with colorectal cancer development in some studies; however, there are limited data on the relation of CRP with colorectal adenomas, established precursors of colorectal cancer.


A nested case-control investigation of CRP levels and incident colorectal adenoma was conducted in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, a randomized trial of 154,942 individuals designed to test the efficacy of flexible sigmoidoscopy on colorectal cancer mortality when performed once, and then repeated 3-5 years later. Serum CRP levels were measured in baseline blood specimens from participants who were free of polyps in the left-sided colorectum at the baseline screening procedure, but who were found at the subsequent screen to have at least one colorectal adenoma(N=356), and in a set of polyp-free, frequency-matched controls(N=396).


In a multivariable logistic regression model that included established colorectal adenoma risk factors, a 1-unit increase in log CRP level was associated with a 15% reduction in risk of developing colorectal adenoma (OR=0.85, 95%CI, 0.75-0.98, Ptrend=0.01). This association did not differ according to body size, smoking behavior, gender, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or adenoma location.


High circulating CRP levels may be protective against colorectal adenoma development.


Though at contrast with mechanistic data on inflammation and colorectal tumorigenesis, this finding is not inconsistent with prior results on CRP and colorectal adenoma and warrants further investigation.


Colorectal cancer is the third most common malignancy among women and men in the United States, with an estimated total of 143,000 cases in 2010(1). The majority of colorectal cancers evolve from colorectal adenomas (the so-called adenoma-carcinoma sequence) and colorectal cancer and adenoma exhibit similar risk factor profiles. Both laboratory and observational evidence support a role for inflammation in colorectal tumorigenesis. Inflammation exerts tumor-promoting effects by damaging DNA(2), stimulating angiogenesis, promoting cell proliferation, and inhibiting apoptosis(3). Further, precursor lesions of colorectal cancer, such as colorectal adenomas frequently exhibit inflammatory histologic features(4). Patients with inflammatory colonic diseases such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer(5), while regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as aspirin confers a 40-50% reduction in colorectal cancer risk(6). Finally, common variants in genes that encode inflammatory cytokines have been associated with both colorectal cancer(7-9) and adenoma(10).

Prospective data on the association between inflammatory markers and colorectal neoplasia are limited. C-reactive protein (CRP), a liver-derived acute phase protein that is routinely examined as a clinical biomarker of inflammation, has been examined prospectively in several colorectal cancer studies. Of the eight published investigations to date, three demonstrated positive associations between circulating CRP levels and colorectal cancer incidence(11-13) while the remainder reported generally null(14-17), or even inverse(18), relationships. To our knowledge, only one study prospectively evaluated the association between CRP levels and colorectal adenoma and the findings of that investigation were essentially null, and even suggested a potentially inverse relationship in a sub-group analysis(19).

Given the prior inconsistent literature on CRP and risk of colorectal cancer, we sought to address whether CRP levels are associated with colorectal tumorigenesis at an earlier stage in the natural history of the disease. We therefore investigated the relation of serum CRP levels with development of colorectal adenoma among 154,942 men and women enrolled in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening (PLCO) trial, a large randomized cancer screening trial.

Materials and Methods

Study design

The case-control study described here was nested within the screening arm of the PLCO trial(20). The PLCO trial is a large, randomized controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of cancer screening and to investigate etiology and early markers of cancer(21-23). From November 1993 until July 2001, 154,942 men and women aged 55-74 years of age who had no prior history of prostate, lung, colorectal or ovarian cancer were enrolled at 10 U.S sites (Birmingham, AL; Denver, CO; Detroit, MI; Honolulu, HI; Marshfield, WI; Minneapolis, MN; Pittsburgh, PA; Salt Lake City, UT; St. Louis, MO and Washington, D.C). Exclusion criteria included current treatment for cancer (other than basal cell and squamous cell skin cancer); prior total colectomy, pneumonectomy, prostatectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy; participation in another cancer screening or primary prevention study; and recent use of finasteride (Proscar) or tamoxifen (Nolvadex). Beginning in April 1995, men who reported more than one serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test, and men and women who reported any lower gastrointestinal procedure (proctoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, barium enema, or colonoscopy) within 3 years prior to study enrollment, were excluded. Those randomly assigned to the screening arm (N = 77,465) were offered a flexible sigmoidoscopy examination of the left-sided colorectum at study entry (T0), of which 83% (64,658) were compliant. The baseline sigmoidoscopy procedure was successfully completed (insertion to at least 50cm within greater than 90% of mucosa visible or a suspect lesion identified) in 57,559 (89%) of the 64,658 participants that underwent screening. Participants had a repeat sigmoidoscopy either 3 or 5 (T3 or T5) years after the T0 screen. If neoplastic lesions were detected during the sigmoidoscopy procedure, participants were referred for subsequent colonoscopic examination. In addition, all participants provided a blood sample at the baseline screen (T0), and then every year after the baseline screen. Blood samples were collected at the clinical centers and were processed and frozen within 2 hours of blood draw and stored at –70°C. All study participants completed a risk factor and dietary questionnaire at baseline. All available medical and pathologic reports on follow-up were obtained and coded by trained medical record abstractors. The institutional review boards of the U.S National Cancer Institute and the 10 screening centers approved the study and all participants provided informed consent.

Study sample

Participants for this nested case-control study were selected from individuals assigned to the screening arm of the PLCO trial between November 1993 and September 1999 who had undergone a successful sigmoidoscopy at T0 and who met the following inclusion criteria: 1) Completion of the baseline risk factor questionnaire; 2) Provided a blood sample for use in etiologic studies; 3) No self-reported history of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, familial polyposis, Gardner's syndrome, colorectal polyps or cancer (except basal cell skin cancer). Cases were identified from all participants who had a negative sigmoidoscopy result at the T0 screen but who were found to have a left-sided colorectal adenoma at the subsequent (T3 or T5) screen. Controls were defined as individuals who tested negative at the T0 sigmoidoscopy screen (i.e. no polyp or other suspect lesion detected), and were also found to be negative at the subsequent screen. Cases (N = 356) were then frequency-matched to controls (N = 396) by age at study entry (categorized as 55-59, 60-64, 65-69 and 70-74 years), gender, fiscal year at study entry, race (categorized as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Pacific Islander), screening center, study protocol (T3 or T5 re-screen) and season of blood draw (categorized as May-September or October-April).

A random sample of 30 control participants with available blood specimens from the T0, T1 and T5 screens were selected to investigate the reproducibility of CRP measurements over a 5-year period. In addition, to investigate whether CRP levels change significantly during colorectal adenoma development, a random sample of 50 selected incident cases were further assayed for serum CRP levels at the T3 or T5 screen (i.e. whenever an adenoma was detected).

Laboratory assays

Specimens were assayed in batches of 40 with cases and matched control sets arranged within the same batch. Specimens from participants obtained at multiple time points were assayed together in the same batch and for quality control purposes, blinded repeat samples (N = 90) were embedded within and between batches to test for assay reproducibility. CRP levels were quantified using a solid phase chemiluminescent immunometric assay using the Immulite analyzer (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Malvern, PA). The solid phase comprises a bead coated with an anti-CRP antibody and the liquid phase consists of alkaline phosphatase conjugated to rabbit polyclonal anti-CRP antibody in buffer. Each specimen was diluted 1:100, and was incubated together with the coated bead for 30 minutes. During this incubation period, CRP forms an antibody sandwich complex with the anti-ligand antibody on the bead and enzyme-conjugated monoclonal murine anti-ligand antibody. Unbound sample and enzyme conjugate are then removed by centrifugation. Finally, chemiluminescent substrate is added and a signal is generated in proportion to the bound enzyme. The concentration of CRP in each sample is then derived from a standard curve. The intra-batch and inter-batch coefficients of variation were 5.9% and 8.1% respectively.

Statistical methods

The baseline characteristics of cases and controls were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test (for continuous data) or Pearson's chi-square (for categorical data; SAS statistical software, version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Since the CRP values were not normally distributed in the control population, they were logarithmically transformed to approximate normality. Intra-individual and inter-individual variances were estimated for the case and control sets with multiple CRP measurements using random effects models and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was derived from these values. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between CRP levels and incidence of colorectal adenoma. CRP values were analyzed as both a continuous, log-transformed variable and as a four-level categorical variable based on the distribution of quartile cut-points in the control population. Multivariable models were adjusted for an a priori-determined set of colorectal neoplasia risk factors, namely, body mass index (BMI, categorized as <25 Kg/M2 (referent), 25-30 Kg/M2 and >30 Kg/M2); regular use of NSAIDs (yes/no), family history of colorectal cancer (yes/no), self-reported history of diabetes (yes/no), educational attainment (no college education/some college education and above), use of hormone therapy (HT, females only; never/ever) and smoking (categorized as never, former or current smoker). Inclusion of other potential covariates such as alcohol consumption, physical activity, and intake of dietary fiber, calcium, folate, vitamin D, saturated fat and red meat, frequency of NSAID use (use per month) and smoking intensity (cigarettes per day), did not lead to any appreciable change in the risk estimates (defined as a 10% or greater change in the beta coefficients) and were therefore not considered in the final multivariable models. Further, inclusion of the matching factors as additional covariates had no impact on the risk estimates. Significance tests for trend were calculated using a single ordinal variable corresponding to the median values for each CRP quartile which was entered into the multivariable model as a continuous variable.

Analyses stratified according to smoking status (never, N=362/ever, N=390), BMI (<25, N=240; ≥25 Kg/M2, N=512), gender (Males, N=491; Females, N=261), NSAID use (user, N=434/non-user, N=318), were performed and tests of heterogeneity were conducted by entering a cross product term of CRP with the variable of interest into the multivariable model, the coefficient of which was evaluated with the Wald test. The association of CRP with colorectal adenoma was also evaluated according to adenoma location (left colon vs. rectum) or advanced histology (defined as ≥ 1 cm, high-grade dysplasia or villous components) All statistical tests were two-sided and a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Selected baseline characteristics of the colorectal adenoma and polyp-free control groups are compared in Table 1. Relative to the controls, the colorectal adenoma cases were more likely to have reported a family history of colorectal cancer and a higher consumption of alcoholic drinks but did not differ significantly with respect to any of the other colorectal adenoma risk factors. The median level of CRP was 1.6 mg/L in the cases and 1.8 mg/L in the controls (P = 0.29).

Table 1
Baseline characteristics of incident colorectal adenoma cases and matched controls in the Prostate Lung Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening (PLCO) trial

Table 2 presents distributions of known colorectal adenoma risk factors across quartiles of CRP among the control participants. CRP levels were positively related to BMI, female gender, diabetes, use of HT (in women), regular use of NSAIDs, and a history of hypertension. Physical activity and consumption of total calories, folate, saturated fat, fiber and calcium were inversely associated with CRP levels.

Table 2
Distribution of selected colorectal adenoma risk factors by quartile of CRP among control (polyp-free) individuals (n=396)

Reproducibility of serum CRP measurements over a 6-year period was assessed in both the colorectal adenoma and control groups. For the controls (N = 30), median CRP levels measured at the three time points (T0, T1 and T5) were essentially constant, and did not differ significantly from each other (P=0.35). For the case series (N = 50), median CRP levels decreased from 1.6 mg/L at baseline (T0) to 1.2 mg/L at either T3 or T5 (i.e. whenever the adenoma was diagnosed), however, these values were also not significantly different (P = 0.37) (Table 3). Further, the ICC values for both the case and control series were similar (0.70 and 0.83 respectively) indicating that the within-individual fluctuations in CRP levels were similar in the two groups.

Table 3
Median levels and inter-quartile ranges for CRP levels in incident colorectal adenoma cases and controls sampled at multiple time points

Table 4 provides ORs and 95% CIs for the association between serum CRP levels and colorectal adenoma incidence. In a multivariable model that included established colorectal adenoma risk factors, a 1-unit increase in log-CRP concentration was associated with a statistically significant 15% reduction in risk of developing colorectal adenoma (OR = 0.85, 95% CI, 0.74-0.98, Ptrend = 0.01). Similarly, when analyzed as a categorical variable, a statistically significant inverse trend was observed across quartiles of CRP level (OR comparing extreme quartiles [ORq4-q1] = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41-1.03; Ptrend = 0.03). The inverse association of CRP with colorectal adenoma incidence was not different when analyses were restricted to advanced adenomas (multivariate OR per unit change in log CRP = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00) and was slightly weaker when restricted to colon adenomas only (multivariate OR per unit change in log CRP = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81-1.07). In addition, the relation between CRP level and colorectal adenoma incidence persisted following exclusion of individuals with very high CRP levels (>10 mg/L, N=80; multivariate OR per unit change in log CRP = 0.90, 95% CI, 0.77-1.05) or when CRP levels were categorized according to cutpoints proposed clinically for cardiovascular disease prevention (≥ 3mg/L compared to < 3mg/L; multivariate OR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.56-1.04). Finally, we observed no difference in the association of CRP level with colorectal adenoma following stratification by BMI, smoking status, gender, or NSAID use (data not shown).

Table 4
Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of colorectal adenoma according to quartiles of the distribution of serum C-reactive protein concentration in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial


In this prospective, sigmoidoscopy-based investigation of colorectal adenoma, circulating levels of CRP, a systemic marker of inflammation, were inversely associated with colorectal adenoma incidence. These data suggest that healthy individuals with elevated levels of CRP may be at lower risk of developing colorectal adenomas-a result that contrasts with findings from several studies of CRP and colorectal cancer incidence and with mechanistic studies of inflammation and colorectal tumorigenesis.

A number of epidemiologic studies have investigated the association of pre-diagnostic CRP concentrations and colorectal cancer risk and have yielded inconsistent results. However, a recent meta-analysis, which summarized data from eight independent prospective investigations, concluded that CRP was a weak, positive risk factor for colorectal cancer (summary relative risk per one unit change in natural log-transformed CRP, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.01-1.25) (24). The inverse association between CRP levels and colorectal adenoma risk observed in the current investigation was surprising given our a priori hypothesis that predicted a positive relationship, in keeping with the tumorigenic effects of inflammation in the colonic mucosa and the aforementioned findings from prospective studies of CRP levels and colorectal cancer risk. However, the results from the current study, though unexpected, are in fact somewhat concurrent with a previous investigation of CRP levels and incident colorectal adenoma development that was conducted within the CLUE II cohort (19). In the CLUE II study, which evaluated pre-diagnostic CRP concentrations and incident adenoma risk among 135 colorectal adenoma cases and 269 matched controls, CRP levels were also inversely, albeit non-significantly, associated with colorectal adenoma risk. In that investigation, the inverse association between CRP levels and colorectal adenoma appeared to be stronger for proximal and tubular adenomas. For the latter, individuals in the highest quartile of CRP had a statistically significant 70% reduction in risk of developing a tubular adenoma than those in the lowest CRP quartile. While these findings are based on a relatively small number of cases, the consistency of the CLUE II data with the results of the current investigation are notable. In addition, our data are partially supported by the results of a recent case-control study conducted in Hawaii which reported that a polymorphism in the CRP gene which is associated with higher circulating CRP levels, was inversely associated with colorectal adenoma prevalence(25).

If the observed inverse association between CRP and colorectal adenoma development is indeed real, it may suggest that an elevated systemic inflammatory state is somehow protective in the early stages of colorectal tumorigenesis. This hypothesis stands in direct contrast to mechanistic and observational evidence which point towards tumorigenic effects of inflammation. However, there are data to demonstrate that neoplastic lesions can be targeted for removal by the immune system(26, 27). In colon cancer patients specifically, atopic dermatitis is accompanied by up-regulation of cytokines that stimulate T-cell infiltration against colon tumor cells(28). Further, circulating levels of eosinophils and mast cells are associated with better prognosis(29) and the type and density of T-cells adjacent to colon tumor cells was shown to be a better predictor of survival than traditional staging(30). Therefore, it may be hypothesized that an individual with a heightened immune response may be at lower risk of developing early neoplastic lesions because they are targeted and removed more effectively than in an individual with a weaker response. This hypothesis is also supported by epidemiologic data which have revealed inverse associations between allergies and cancer risk(31). Allergies are associated with enhanced immunosurveillance and the increased immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels which accompany an allergic response have been shown to decrease tumor development and increase survival time in murine models(32-34). In a recent investigation nested within the Iowa Women's Health Study, a statistically significant reduced incidence of colorectal cancer was observed among allergy-sufferers compared to those with no reported allergies, suggesting that heightened immunosurveillance associated with allergic response may indeed be protective against colorectal tumorigenesis(35). In addition, CRP itself may play a direct role in the elimination of neoplastic lesions through its function as an opsonin. CRP plays a key role in tissue repair and maintenance of tissue homeostasis - binding to damaged or apoptotic cells and targeting them for removal by immune cells(36). Therefore, higher CRP levels may lead to more efficient elimination of pre-cancerous cells and reduced incidence of colorectal adenoma.

The findings of this study may, however, raise questions regarding the utility of CRP as a biomarker of colonic inflammation. CRP synthesis occurs in the liver in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α which are released by phagocytes and adipocytes. CRP levels are routinely measured in clinical settings to evaluate a patient's overall inflammatory state and are considered a sensitive, yet non-specific, marker of chronic inflammation. However, CRP is also an acute phase protein and circulating levels of CRP can be influenced by a wide range of exogenous and endogenous factors and it is not known to what degree circulating CRP levels reflect low-grade inflammation in the colonic mucosa. A serologic biomarker that is specific to colonic inflammation has yet to be identified; however, a recent cross-sectional study of colorectal adenomas reported a significant positive relationship between circulating levels of IL-6 and TNF-α and colorectal adenoma prevalence, and a weaker, non-significant association for CRP(37). Unfortunately, the current study lacks data on IL-6 and TNF- α levels but the assessment of these factors in relation to incident colorectal adenoma could prove highly informative. In addition, further work is required to ascertain the degree to which circulating CRP level is indicative of colonic inflammation, while future prospective studies of colorectal adenoma may wish to explore the additional inflammatory parameters and cytokines that have been mechanistically linked to colorectal tumorigenesis to more accurately evaluate the role of inflammation in the early stages of colorectal cancer.

Given that CRP levels can be influenced by a broad range of factors, it is also plausible that the current findings are the result of bias or confounding by unrecognized parameters. One possibility is that individuals with high levels of CRP may be more likely to be at higher risk for cardiovascular disease or other diseases associated with obesity and the metabolic syndrome, and they may have been using medications which are protective against colorectal adenomas, e.g. NSAIDs or statins. Indeed, in our study population, NSAID use was more common among those with the highest CRP levels; however, the inverse association between CRP levels and colorectal adenoma incidence did not differ according to use of NSAIDs. We note, however, that the NSAID data was only collected at the baseline sigmoidoscopy, and assessment of NSAIDs and other lifestyle factors at multiple time points may have allowed more accurate classification of habitual exposure. Further, data on other medications that may be relevant, such as statin use, were also not available, however, we feel it is unlikely that our findings were significantly influenced by statin use due to the relatively low prevalence of use at the time the baseline blood specimens were collected (38). We also considered the fact that some individuals had very high levels of CRP (>10 mg/L)-indicative of acute inflammation at any site in the body, and speculated that these subjects might be driving the inverse association between CRP and colorectal adenoma. We, therefore, performed a sensitivity analysis whereby we evaluated the relation of CRP with colorectal adenoma following exclusion of all subjects with CRP >10 mg/L (N = 80), and found the results to be essentially unaltered. Similarly, we also analyzed the data using CRP cutpoints that have been proposed clinically for cardiovascular disease prevention (≥ 3mg/L compared to < 3mg/L), and likewise observed no overall change in the findings (data not shown).

Strengths of the study include a population of subjects with incident colorectal adenomas and matched controls that had undergone a flexible sigmoidoscopy and were known to be free of neoplasia in the left-sided colorectum at the baseline screen. A limitation is lack of data on polyp status in the right-sided colorectum as this was not evaluated during the screening procedure. The availability of serum from multiple time points in a sub-set of both the case and control groups enabled us to perform an assessment of the temporal reproducibility of CRP levels in both the cases and the controls. The relative stability of CRP levels over a five-year period in both the case and control groups suggests that a one-time measurement of CRP provides an accurate estimate of medium-term levels and that the development of colorectal adenoma is not associated with any significant changes in circulating CRP levels .

In summary, we found CRP levels to be inversely related to the development of colorectal adenoma-data that is not inconsistent with the majority of results from other studies of CRP and colorectal adenoma risk. This finding suggests that an elevated systemic inflammatory response (as evaluated by CRP levels) may be protective against the early stages of colorectal tumorigenesis, hypothetically through enhanced immunosurveillance.


This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and by contracts from the Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS. The authors thank Drs. Christine Berg and Philip Prorok, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, the Screening Center investigators and staff of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, Mr. Tom Riley and staff, Information Management Services, Inc., Ms. Barbara O'Brien and staff, Westat, Inc., Mr. Tim Sheehy and staff, DNA Extraction and Staging Laboratory, SAIC-Frederick, Inc, and Ms. Jackie King and staff, BioReliance, Inc. Most importantly, we acknowledge the study participants for their contributions to making this study possible.


Disclosures: Dr Limburg served as a consultant for Genomic Health, Inc from August 12, 2008 to April 19, 2010.


1. American Cancer Society Cancer Facts and Figures. 2010.
2. Jaiswal M, LaRusso NF, Burgart LJ, Gores GJ. Inflammatory cytokines induce DNA damage and inhibit DNA repair in cholangiocarcinoma cells by a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res. 2000;60:184–90. [PubMed]
3. Jackson JR, Bolognese B, Kircher CH, Marshall LA, Winkler JD. Modulation of angiogenesis in a model of chronic inflammation. Inflamm Res. 1997;46(Suppl 2):S129–30. [PubMed]
4. Higaki S, Akazawa A, Nakamura H, Yanai H, Yoshida T, Okita K. Metaplastic polyp of the colon develops in response to inflammation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;14:709–14. [PubMed]
5. Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2001;48:526–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Group IW. IARC handbook of cancer prevention, volume 1: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 1. IARC-WHO; Lyon (France): 1997.
7. Slattery ML, Wolff RK, Herrick JS, Caan BJ, Potter JD. IL6 genotypes and colon and rectal cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18:1095–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Tsilidis KK, Helzlsouer KJ, Smith MW, et al. Association of common polymorphisms in IL10, and in other genes related to inflammatory response and obesity with colorectal cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:1739–51. [PubMed]
9. Landi S, Moreno V, Gioia-Patricola L, et al. Association of common polymorphisms in inflammatory genes interleukin (IL)6, IL8, tumor necrosis factor alpha, NFKB1, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma with colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3560–6. [PubMed]
10. Gunter MJ, Canzian F, Landi S, Chanock SJ, Sinha R, Rothman N. Inflammation-related gene polymorphisms and colorectal adenoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1126–31. [PubMed]
11. Erlinger TP, Platz EA, Rifai N, Helzlsouer KJ. C-reactive protein and the risk of incident colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2004;291:585–90. [PubMed]
12. Gunter MJ, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Cross AJ, et al. A prospective study of serum C-reactive protein and colorectal cancer risk in men. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2483–7. [PubMed]
13. Il'yasova D, Colbert LH, Harris TB, et al. Circulating levels of inflammatory markers and cancer risk in the health aging and body composition cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2413–8. [PubMed]
14. Ito Y, Suzuki K, Tamakoshi K, et al. Colorectal cancer and serum C-reactive protein levels: a case-control study nested in the JACC Study. J Epidemiol. 2005;15(Suppl 2):S185–9. [PubMed]
15. Otani T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Tsugane S. Plasma C-reactive protein and risk of colorectal cancer in a nested case-control study: Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:690–5. [PubMed]
16. Siemes C, Visser LE, Coebergh JW. C-reactive protein levels, variation in the C-reactive protein gene, and cancer risk: the Rotterdam Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5216–22. [PubMed]
17. Trichopoulos D, Psaltopoulou T, Orfanos P, Trichopoulou A, Boffetta P. Plasma C-reactive protein and risk of cancer: a prospective study from Greece. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:381–4. [PubMed]
18. Zhang SM, Buring JE, Lee IM, Cook NR, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein levels are not associated with increased risk for colorectal cancer in women. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:425–32. [PubMed]
19. Tsilidis KK, Erlinger TP, Rifai N, et al. C-reactive protein and colorectal adenoma in the CLUE II cohort. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:559–67. [PubMed]
20. Prorok PC, Andriole GL, Bresalier RS, et al. Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:273S–309S. [PubMed]
21. Hayes RB, Reding D, Kopp W, et al. Etiologic and early marker studies in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:349S–355S. [PubMed]
22. Hayes RB, Sigurdson A, Moore L, et al. Methods for etiologic and early marker investigations in the PLCO trial. Mutat Res. 2005;592:147–54. [PubMed]
23. Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:251S–272S. [PubMed]
24. Tsilidis KK, Branchini C, Guallar E, Helzlsouer KJ, Erlinger TP, Platz EA. C-reactive protein and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review of prospective studies. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:1133–40. [PubMed]
25. Ognjanovic S, Yamamoto J, Saltzman B, et al. Serum CRP and IL-6, genetic variants and risk of colorectal adenoma in a multiethnic population. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21:1131–8. [PubMed]
26. Munitz A, Levi-Schaffer F. Eosinophils: ‘new’ roles for ‘old’ cells. Allergy. 2004;59:268–75. [PubMed]
27. Gleich GJ. Mechanisms of eosinophil-associated inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105:651–63. [PubMed]
28. Yamada H, Izutani R, Chihara J, Yudate T, Matsukura M, Tezuka T. RANTES mRNA expression in skin and colon of patients with atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1996;111(Suppl 1):19–21. [PubMed]
29. Nielsen HJ, Hansen U, Christensen IJ, Reimert CM, Brunner N, Moesgaard F. Independent prognostic value of eosinophil and mast cell infiltration in colorectal cancer tissue. J Pathol. 1999;189:487–95. [PubMed]
30. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313:1960–4. [PubMed]
31. Wang H, Diepgen TL. Is atopy a protective or a risk factor for cancer? A review of epidemiological studies. Allergy. 2005;60:1098–111. [PubMed]
32. Lynch NR, Salomon JC. Passive local anaphylaxis: demonstration of antitumor activity and complementation of intratumor BCG. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977;58:1093–8. [PubMed]
33. Correnti M, Sanchez M, Suarez Chacon R. A role for anaphylactic sensitization in tumor control. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1985;76:20–4. [PubMed]
34. Jui S, Zhang YH. On the relationship between type I hypersensitivity and cancer: a review. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1990;8:61–4. [PubMed]
35. Prizment AE, Folsom AR, Cerhan JR, Flood A, Ross JA, Anderson KE. History of allergy and reduced incidence of colorectal cancer, Iowa Women's Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:2357–62. [PubMed]
36. Gershov D, Kim S, Brot N, Elkon KB. C-Reactive protein binds to apoptotic cells, protects the cells from assembly of the terminal complement components, and sustains an antiinflammatory innate immune response: implications for systemic autoimmunity. J Exp Med. 2000;192:1353–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Kim S, Keku TO, Martin C, et al. Circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines and risk of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Res. 2008;68:323–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Ma J, Sehgal NL, Ayanian JZ, Stafford RS. National trends in statin use by coronary heart disease risk category. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e123. [PMC free article] [PubMed]