We provide evidence that P2Y
1 modulates the transduction of thermal stimuli in cutaneous polymodal nociceptors. P2Y
1 is highly expressed in DRG neurons and appears to be enriched in IB4-binding neurons, many of which are polymodal nociceptors [
31,
32]. Functional responses to ADP were widespread in this subset of neurons and were presumably mediated by P2Y
1, given that ADP-evoked Ca
2+ transients are largely absent in neurons from P2Y
1-/- mice [
21]. In mice lacking P2Y
1, CPM nociceptors showed reduced sensitivity to both heating and cooling, but not mechanical stimuli.
The results presented here demonstrate that cutaneous CPM fibers require P2Y
1 for the normal transduction of thermal stimuli. However, the underlying mechanism of action of P2Y
1 remains unclear. P2Y
1 has been reported to inhibit both Ca
2+-dependent K
+ channels [
33] and the M-type K
+ current [
34] in neurons
in vitro, which would tend to enhance excitability and firing frequency. Alternatively, it has recently been suggested that G
i-coupled ADP receptors P2Y
12-13 inhibit voltage-dependent calcium channels in sensory neurons and this inhibition is enhanced in the absence of P2Y
1 [
21]. However, the finding that the deficit is modality-specific would seem to rule out the possibility that this phenotype is caused by a reduction in overall neuronal excitability.
There are several other possible mechanisms that warrant discussion. First, a growing body of evidence implicates nucleotide signaling in the transduction of noxious stimuli. A recent report demonstrated a graded release of ATP from keratinocytes in response to increasing heat, suggesting that keratinocytes may participate in the transduction of thermal stimuli, particularly in complex with neurons lacking TRPV1 [
35]. Keratinocytes, which contain TRPV3 and TRPV4, could respond to heat by releasing ATP and subsequently activating neuronal P2Y
1 receptors. Nucleotide signaling may thus provide a mechanism for communication from keratinocytes to sensory axon terminals. If this model is correct, then thermal transduction in CPM fibers requires an intact axon-keratinocyte complex and would not be detectable in isolated DRG neurons. This mechanism contrasts with TRPV1-mediated heat responses that can be evoked in isolated neurons
in vitro [
36,
37]. Intriguingly, while dissociated neurons isolated from TRPV1 knockout mice showed no heat-gated currents, CPM fibers in TRPV1-/- mice had normal heat responses when in contact with the skin [
31,
36]. Further support for a role of nucleotide transmission in thermal sensation is provided by several reports suggesting that P2X
3 contributes to the transduction of warming stimuli [
14,
38]. It is worth noting that there was no difference in mRNA levels for P2X
3 between WT and P2Y
1-/- DRG.
A number of studies have reported that keratinocytes release ATP in response to mechanical as well as thermal stimuli, suggesting a common transduction mechanism for mechanical and heat stimuli in polymodal nociceptors [
38]. However, neither P2X
3-/- [
13,
14] nor P2Y
1-/- mice (Figure ) showed deficits in mechanosensation. Furthermore, we have examined the activation time for these CPM fibers to mechanical stimuli and found that in response to suprathreshold stimuli, action potentials are evoked within a few ms of the onset of the mechanical stimulus. Unfortunately, we are unable to determine the activation time for thermal stimuli, as we cannot deliver thermal stimuli with the same temporal precision as we can with the mechanical stimulus. While it is possible for GPCRs to function directly as stimulus transducers (e.g. rhodopsin) and this process can be quite rapid (e.g. phototransduction), it is difficult to imagine how mechanical stimuli could elicit ATP release from keratinocytes, diffusion of ATP to axon terminals and activation of P2Y signaling in such a rapid fashion. Therefore, a modulatory role is more likely. Two studies have reported a potentiating effect of ATP on mechanically induced signaling in sensory neurons [
16,
39]. In both studies a role for P2Y
1 was ruled out by the failure of the P2Y
1/P2X antagonist PPADS to reverse the ATP effect (note that at publication of the former study it was not yet known that PPADS inhibits P2Y
1), consistent with the lack of a mechanical phenotype in P2Y
1-/- cutaneous afferents reported here. Therefore, the actions of P2Y
1 in CPM stimulus transduction appear to be restricted to thermal stimuli. P2Y receptors likely modulate the function of channels that act as dedicated transducers for thermal stimuli (rev. in [
7]). Thus, it is possible that as-yet unidentified ionotropic receptors responsible for the transduction of thermal stimuli in CPM neurons require an interaction with P2Y
1 receptors for normal function.
Decreased thermal sensitivity is TRP-independent
In initial studies, Tominaga et al. [
40] suggested that P2Y
1 might modulate TRPV1 function. However, later studies revealed that in sensory neurons P2Y
2 and not P2Y
1 is co-expressed with TRPV1 and required for the modulation of TRPV1 by ATP [
22,
24]. We have previously demonstrated the presence of TRPV1 immunoreactivity in mouse to be exclusively in mechanically-insensitive cutaneous CH afferents [
32]. Here as previously, all CPM fibers examined lacked TRPV1 immunoreactivity. In addition, although we recorded from only a few CH fibers (3) in P2Y
1 deficient mice, there were no apparent effects on their heat sensitivity. Finally, there was no difference in TRPV1 mRNA levels between WT and P2Y
1-/- DRG.
Our results indicate that P2Y
1 also contributes to the response of CPM fibers to cold stimuli. Two TRP channels have been implicated in the transduction of cold stimuli: TRPA1 and TRPM8. Although we did not perform immunostaining for TRPA1 or TRPM8, results from previous studies suggest that these channels are not localized in the cutaneous CPM population. For example, TRPM8 is not expressed in IB4-positive neurons [
41,
42]. Furthermore, G
q-coupled receptor signaling has been reported to reduce TRPM8 currents [
43], whereas in our studies both heat and cold sensitivity were reduced in the absence of P2Y
1. TRPA1 has also been reported to co-localize almost exclusively with TRPV1 and not with IB4 binding [
44,
45]. Thus, the impact of P2Y
1 deletion on the thermal transduction process in cutaneous CPM fibers does not appear to involve any of the known thermosensitive channels responsive to the temperature range examined here.
While the results presented here demonstrate a clear deficit in thermal transduction properties of CPM fibers in mice lacking P2Y
1, Malin and Molliver [
21] reported that these mice had behavioral heat withdrawal latencies that were not different than those of wildtype mice. However, they did find that there was a significant difference in the level of inflammation-induced heat hyperalgesia. While not as striking, this finding is similar to that seen in mice lacking TRPV1, which had relatively normal acute heat responses but did not develop heat hyperalgesia following inflammation [
36,
37].
It is interesting to note that these two fiber types, CPM and CH fibers, constitute virtually all cutaneous C-fibers that respond to heat. Based on the behavioral studies of these knockout mice it appears that while heat-evoked behaviors can be mediated by both TRPV1-containing CH fibers [
46] and TRPV1-deficient CPM fibers [
36,
37], the relatively small population of CH fibers are more efficient at evoking behavioral responses in mice. This seems to be most clearly evident in the response to heat following inflammation. However, this interpretation may be biased by the fact that while CPM fibers in P2Y1-/- mice show a reduced ability to transduce heat stimuli, TRPV1-/- mice are entirely lacking in CH fibers [
32,
47]. Thus it is most likely that both afferent populations are necessary for acute heat hyperalgesia following injury.