PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmjcrInstructions for authorsCurrent ToCBMJ Case Reports
 
BMJ Case Rep. 2010; 2010: bcr11.2009.2468.
Published online May 6, 2010. doi:  10.1136/bcr.11.2009.2468
PMCID: PMC3047527
Rare disease
Survival following localised aortic atherosclerotic plaque rupture
Sonali Vijay Thakrar, Belinda Sandler, Andrew Ladwiniec, and Mary Lynch
Lister Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage SG1 4AB, UK
Correspondence to Sonali Vijay Thakrar, svthakrar/at/yahoo.co.uk
Abstract
Spontaneous rupture of the aorta due to ruptured atherosclerotic plaque is extremely rare. Despite the high prevalence of atherosclerosis, only four cases have been reported to have been identified and treated successfully; the remainder were diagnosed postmortem. We report a surviving case of pericardial tamponade due to highly localised aortic atherosclerotic plaque rupture.
Background
Spontaneous aortic atherosclerotic plaque rupture is rare. Before 1995, only four reported cases of patients surviving a diagnosis of aortic plaque rupture have been identified. Most presented with atypical chest pain and in three out of four cases haemodynamic compromise was noted shortly after arrival to the emergency department.1 This case highlights that even in the absence of an identified aortic dissection on a variety of imaging modalities, aortic plaque rupture as a cause of haemopericardium and circulatory collapse remains a possibility.
A 72-year-old man with a background history of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and osteoarthritis, was brought to the emergency department complaining of acute retrosternal chest pain followed by transient syncope. There was no history of previous chest pain. The patient was usually in good health. His regular medications included simvastatin 10 mg once daily, aspirin 75 mg once daily, and atenolol 50 mg once daily.
At presentation he was noted to be peripherally shut down. His blood pressure was initially 130/97 mm Hg. This deteriorated to a systolic blood pressure between 90–110 mm Hg. Admission blood results were as follows: haemoglobin 8.9 g/dl, white blood cell count 10.3×109/l, platelets 116×109/l, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 95 fl, sodium 141 mmol/l, potassium 4.4 mmol/l, urea 8.0 mmol/l, and creatinine 147 umol/l. Cardiac enzymes were not requested in the absence of electrocardiographic (ECG) changes.
ECG revealed sinus rhythm at 60 beats/min with no significant abnormality. A chest radiograph showed bibasal atelectasis only, with normal mediastinal size and contour.
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed revealing a 3.0 cm pericardial effusion with “fibrinous stranding and thrombus” suggestive of haemopericardium. There was also significant right ventricular collapse (fig 1A).
Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Transthoracic echocardiogram: subcostal view showing 3.0 cm pericardial effusion with haematoma. (B) Transoesophageal echocardiogram: undilated ascending aorta. (C) Normal aortic angiogram.
The primary differential diagnosis at this stage was aortic dissection. Other causes of spontaneous haemopericardium causing tamponade include coronary artery rupture secondary to coronary intervention (which this patient had never had before presentation).
An urgent computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax showed no evidence of an aortic dissection flap, although there was haematoma around the ascending aorta as well as haemopericardium. The descending aorta and aortic arch appeared normal.
Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) showed no evidence of a dissection flap. The proximal aorta measured 3.4 cm in diameter, hence was not dilated. There was a possibility of intramural haematoma in the proximal aorta but this was not conclusive of an aortic dissection (fig 1B). As clinical suspicion was still high, a transfemoral aortogram was performed to evaluate the possibility of aortic dissection further. Aortic angiography revealed no intraluminal dissection and coronary angiography revealed no significant coronary artery disease or evidence of fistula (fig 1C).
The patient remained haemodynamically unstable. In view of the echocardiographic features of the pericardial effusion suggesting thrombus, it was felt that percutaneous drainage would not be successful and possibly run the risk of even more haemodynamic instability. After discussion with an off-site cardiothoracic surgeon, he was transferred to emergency theatres for thoracotomy and evacuation of pericardial haematoma to relieve tamponade. A vascular surgeon and subsequently a cardiothoracic surgeon were in attendance. Operative findings included a tense pericardium with substantial blood clot. On visual inspection the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery appeared bruised, consistent with a likely aortic plaque rupture. Bleeding from the aorta had ceased. Epi-aortic echocardiography confirmed no dissection flap in the ascending aorta, but there was evidence of plaque disease. The diagnosis was felt to be a highly localised aortic plaque rupture causing haemopericardium and tamponade.
After a prolonged stay in intensive care, the patient made a full recovery. Follow-up TTE revealed no pericardial effusion. There was marginal aortic root dilatation with a maximum diameter of 4 cm at the sinus of Valsalva. The likelihood of re-rupture is unknown but he has continued on statin treatment to attempt to prevent further plaque rupture. Good blood pressure control has been achieved with augmentation of his β-blocker dosage. This in turn will also help reduce progression of aortic root dilatation.
Differential diagnosis
  • Aortic dissection
  • Coronary artery rupture
  • Aortic atherosclerotic plaque rupture.
Spontaneous rupture of the aorta due to ruptured atherosclerotic plaque is extremely rare. Despite the common prevalence of atherosclerosis, there are 32 cases reported up to 2005.2 The first reported case of spontaneous aortic rupture was in 19613 and only 13 identified before 1995.1 In a literature review all but four cases were reported as being diagnosed postmortem.
The most common underlying pathology of spontaneous rupture is a dissecting aortic aneurysm associated with trauma with or without cystic medial necrosis. Atherosclerosis is the next most common cause and can lead to spontaneous aortic rupture without aneurysm. The majority of cases of spontaneous aortic rupture without aneurysm occur in the thoracic aorta.1
Clinical presentation is usually with atypical chest pain and haemodynamic compromise. This is largely related to the presence of pericardial effusion leading to tamponade. Clinical investigations in this scenario are usually aimed at diagnosing aortic dissection in the first instance. From the 13 reported cases of aortic plaque rupture, none had a diagnosis of spontaneous rupture of the aorta made before death or surgery, and there were no particular features to differentiate them from an aortic dissection.1
In the four reported cases of patients surviving spontaneous aortic plaque rupture between 1983 and 1991, the patients presented with chest pain, circulatory collapse or both. All had a history of hypertension.1 Investigations such as TOE and CT may not have been readily available at these times. Spontaneous rupture of the aorta was diagnosed at the time of surgery. Three cases involved the ascending aorta and one involved the descending thoracic aorta.
This case highlights the importance of the consideration of aortic plaque rupture as a cause of haemopericardium and circulatory collapse, in particular when there is an absence of identifiable aortic dissection on various imaging modalities. High clinical suspicion should prompt early cardiothoracic surgical involvement, even in the absence of a confirmed dissection flap on imaging.4
Learning points
  • Importance of consideration of aortic plaque rupture as a cause of haemopericardium and circulatory collapse.
  • There may not be identifiable features of aortic dissection on imagining modalities.
  • High clinical suspicion should prompt early involvement of cardiothoracic surgeons to make a difference.
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Patient consent: Patient/guardian consent was obtained for publication.
REFERENCES
1. Ma TKF, Ang LC. Spontaneous rupture of the thoracic aorta through an atheromatous plaque: case report and Literature review. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1996; 17: 38–42. [PubMed]
2. Komanapalli CB, Tripathy U, Ravichandran PS, et al. Sponatanoues rupture of the thoracic aorta. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29: 616–18. [PubMed]
3. Rodriguez HF, Rivera E. Spontaneous rupture of the thoracic aorta through a atheromatous plaque. Ann Intern Med 1961; 54: 307–13. [PubMed]
4. Handa N, Takamoto S, Hatanaka M, et al. Spontaneous non-traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 42(6): 355–7. [PubMed]
Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of
BMJ Group