Recovered values for ΔCHbO are illustrated in for different positions of the optical array and in for different positions of the region of activation. In both figures, panel (a)–(d) shows 3D coronal views of the anatomical head model including the extra-cerebral vasculature (in black) and the region of activation (in gold) superimposed with the optical arrays. Sources and detectors are represented by red and blue dots, respectively. The corresponding recovered changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration ΔCHbO are illustrated in bar graphs in histograms (e) and (f) for source-detector distances of 30 and 45 mm, respectively. The results are shown for the three recovery procedures: (1) using the anatomical model including the extra-cerebral vasculature (cyan: Sinus-PPL), (2) using the anatomical model where the extra-cerebral vasculature was not modeled and based on brain partial pathlengths (yellow: NoSinus-PPL), and (3) with total differential pathlength (dark red: NoSinus-DPL). The corresponding correction factors computed as the ratio between the true and recovered hemoglobin changes are listed in . Recovered values for ΔCHbR were similar and are not shown.
| Table 2.Correction factors [no unit] for ΔCHbO computed by the ratio between the true and the recovered change |
Hemoglobin concentration changes recovered with the model including the extra-cerebral vasculature (Sinus-PPL) at 30 mm varied between 21 and 81% of the true value (9
µMol/
![[ell]](/corehtml/pmc/pmcents/x2113.gif)
), which corresponded to correction factors starting at 4.7 and decreasing to 1.3, respectively. In simulation A-3 (), where the optical array entirely overlapped the sagittal sinus, and C-2 (), where the region of activation was located at 30 mm from the midline, the correction factors were higher (6.2 and 19.1, respectively). The concentration changes recovered with the model including the vasculature (Sinus-PPL) at 45 mm were all between 23 and 64% of the simulated change, which corresponded to correction factors ranging from 4.4 and decreasing to 1.6, respectively.
The concentration changes recovered with no vasculature and using partial pathlength (NoSinus-PPL) were lower and reached not more than between 1 and 45% of the true change for 30 and 45 mm, respectively. The correction factors for source-detector distance of 30 mm ranged from 2.2 to 9.7 while 2.2 to 3.5 for 45 mm (excluding A-3 and C-2). The correction factors obtained with no vasculature and using total differential pathlength (NoSinus-DPL) were markedly higher and are listed in . When considering the extra-cerebral vasculature in the head model, the correction factors were at least 1.4-fold lower than the values computed with no vasculature (except for A-V: at least 1.1-fold). In the absence of the extra-cerebral vasculature, the correction factors computed using partial pathlength (NoSinus-PPL) were at least 7-fold lower than the values computed with total differential pathlength (NoSinus-DPL).
Baseline brain partial (PPL) and total differential (DPL) pathlengths [mm] of all cases presented in and are compiled in for both wavelengths of 690 and 830 nm as well as for both head models (Sinus and NoSinus). For the head model including the vasculature (Sinus), PPL vary from 1.6 to 30.5 mm. Case A-V presents higher pathlength values since the optical arrays is positioned parallel to the sagittal sinus (vertical position). When the extra-cerebral vasculature is not described, PPL vary from 6.8 to 35.8 mm while total DPL from 146.2 to 282.5 mm. Pathlengths have higher values in this configuration (NoSinus) because of the absence of the vasculature. Baseline pathlengths from cases B-1 and C-1 are identical to that of case A-1 while cases B-2 and C-2 to case A-2 because of the identical optical arrays used to propagate light at 690 and 830 nm.
| Table 3.Baseline Brain partial (PPL) and total differential (DPL) pathlengths [mm] |
shows correction factors computed when considering the partial pathlength with detected photons having traveled only in the given region of activation (), i.e. where the change in absorption was introduced [
21,
38], as opposed to brain PPL used to calculate correction factors from . Correction factors are presented for the four cases of in which the
traditional partial pathlength, noted “tPPL” for the purpose of this study, was considered. As expected, the recovery is much more accurate for the two head models, especially for the model including the extra-cerebral vasculature in which values almost reach the true value of 9
µMol/
![[ell]](/corehtml/pmc/pmcents/x2113.gif)
. Correction factors are close to 1 for the Sinus model while higher for the head model without vasculature. Case A-V shows the lower values (1.11 and 1.34 for 30 and 45 mm, respectively).
| Table 4.Correction factors [no unit] when recovering ΔCHbO with traditional partial pathlength (tPPL) of detected photons within only the given region of activation for cases described in ; Cases from yield similar results |
Results of the simulations with the HD grid are illustrated in . Panel (a)–(c) depicts 3D coronal views of the anatomical head model including the extra-cerebral vasculature (in black) and the regions of activation (in gold) superimposed with the HD grid. The sources and the detectors are represented by red and blue dots, respectively. The recovered changes in hemoglobin Δ
CSinusHbO estimated with the model including the extra-cerebral vasculature (Sinus) are illustrated in panel (d)–(f) for different activation regions. Panel (g)–(i) shows corresponding recovered Δ
CNoSinusHbO estimated when the vasculature was not taken into account (No Sinus). Finally, panel (j)–(l) shows corresponding normalized differences (in percentage) between reconstructed Δ
CHbO from the two anatomical models. The white dashed circle superimposed on each 9 sub-figures was drawn to indicate the diameter of the region of activation. Both anatomical head models shown similar reconstruction maps of Δ
CHbO varying from 0 to 6
µMol/
![[ell]](/corehtml/pmc/pmcents/x2113.gif)
while a change of 9
µMol/
![[ell]](/corehtml/pmc/pmcents/x2113.gif)
was simulated. Both methods were able to reconstruct the change in hemoglobin concentration with a good spatial accuracy. The difference between the two reconstructions was less than 10% and decreased as the distance between the simulated activation and the midline increased (panel (j)–(l)).