Floatation-spectrophotometric Determination of Thorium, Using Complex Formation with Eriochrome Cyanine R

doi:10.4137/ACI.S5949

Anal Chem Insights. 2011; 6: 1–6.

Published online 2011 January 24. doi: 10.4137/ACI.S5949

PMCID: PMC3040072

Floatation-spectrophotometric Determination of Thorium, Using Complex Formation with Eriochrome Cyanine R

Sabah Shiri,¹ Ali Delpisheh,² Ali Haeri,³ Abdolhossein Poornajaf,² Tahereh Khezeli,¹ and Nadie Badkiu¹

¹Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

²Department of Epidemiology, Ilam University of Medical sciences, Ilam, Iran

³Department of Pharmacology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Corresponding author email: poornajaf/at/yahoo.com

This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A novel and sensitive floatation-spectrophotometric method is presented for determination of trace amounts of thorium in water samples. The method is based on the ion-associated formation between thorium, Eriochrome cyanine R and Brij-35 at pH = 4 media. The complex was floated in the interface of the aqueous phase and n-hexane by vigorous shaking. After removing the aqueous phase the floated particles were dissolved in methanol and the absorbance was measured at 607 nm. The influence of different important parameters such as Eriochrome cyanine R and surfactants concentration, pH, volume of n-hexane, standing time and interfering ions were evaluated. Under optimized conditions the calibration graph was linear in the range of 6–230 ng mL⁻¹ of thorium with a correlation coefficient of 0.9985. The limit of detections (LOD), based on signal to noise ratio (S/N) of 3 was 1.7 ng mL⁻¹. The relative standard deviations for determination of 150 and 30 ng ml⁻¹ of thorium were 3.26 and 4.41%, respectively (n = 10). The method showed a good linearity, recoveries, as well as some advantages such as sensitivity, simplicity, affordability and a high feasibility. The method was successfully applied to determine thorium in different water and urine samples.

Keywords: flotation-spectrophotometric, thorium, Eriochrome cyanine R

Introductory Statement

Thorium has extensively been used in a variety of applications such as industrial, energy and environmental issues.1–3 Due to negative impacts of thorium such as toxicity, radio toxicity and carcinogenic properties, such kind of applications generate a diversity of wastes which pollute waters.4–8

Many procedures have been developed for determination of thorium in water samples, including liquid–liquid extraction,9,10 and solid phase extraction (SPE).11–14 However, these traditional techniques are time consuming, less sensitive and require a large amount of toxic organic solvents.

Extracting a trace amount of thorium spectrophotometry has been introduced as a powerful technique due to its acceptable precision and accuracy, associated with its lower cost compared to the other techniques.4,15,16

In the present research, a fast and sensitive flotation-spectrophotometric method was developed for quantitative determination of thorium, based on its complex formation with Eriochrome cyanine R in buffer media. Using this method, a complex was formed between thorium and Eriochrome cyanine R, floated into the interface between aqueous and n-hexane phase and then extracted into methanol solvent with an absorbance measured at 607 nm.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and solvents

All reagents were of analytical grade (Merck, Germany). Solutions were prepared with double distilled water. A 1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ of Brij-35 solution, 1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ of Eriochrome cyanine R, and 10 μg mL⁻¹stock solution of thorium was prepared by dissolving thorium nitrate salt in freshly distilled water. Standard working solutions of various concentrations were obtained by an appropriate dilution of stock solution with water before use.

Instrumentation

The spectrophotometer UV-Vis (model 1245, Shimadzu, Japan) was used for all the absorbance measurements with a 10 mm quartz cell. pH measurements were made with a 827 pH meter (Metrohm, Switzerland) equipped with a combine Ag/AgCl glass electrode.

Floatation-spectrophotometric procedure

A 1 mL portion of the standard solution containing the thorium at concentration level of 10 μg mL⁻¹ was placed into a 100 mL volumetric flask. To this solution 15 mL of 1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ Eriochrome cyanine R, 5 mL of buffer with pH = 4, 10 mL of 1M NaCl, 1.5 mL of 1 × 10⁻⁴ mol L⁻¹ Brij-35 were added. This mixture was diluted to the mark with fresh water. After 8 min, the flask contents completely transferred into a 100 mL separating funnel containing 11 mL of n-hexane. The funnel is sealed and vigorously shaken for 65s and then allowed to stand for 4 min. After this time the aqueous phase was extracted and 2 mL of methanol was added to the organic phase. The complex was dissolved in methanol and the absorbance was read at 607 nm against a reagent blank.

Results and Discussion

In the present study the effects of several important parameters influencing the flotation step such as type of the organic phase, pH of the solution, concentration of Eriochrome cyanine R, surfactant, floatation, relaxation and complexation time were investigated.

Effect of Eriochrome cyanine R concentration

The selection of optimum concentration of Eriochrome cyanine R is one of the important parameter in the flotation method. The effect of Eriochrome cyanine R concentration used for the floatation of thorium was evaluated in the range from 0.4 × 10⁻⁵ mol L⁻¹ to 1.7 × 10⁻⁵ mol L⁻¹. The maximum absorbance occurs to Eriochrome cyanine R concentration above 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ mol L⁻¹ therefore, a concentration value of 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ mol L⁻¹ was chosen for further investigation (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Effect of Eriochrome cyanine R concentration. Experimental condition: pH = 4, volume of buffer = 5 mL, concentration of surfactant = 1.5 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹, volume of n-hexane = 11 mL, volume of methanol = 2 mL, standing time = 4 min. (more ...)

Effect of pH and volume of buffer

Figure 2 demonstrates the influence of pH and volume of buffer (mL) on the absorbance efficiency within the range of 1–10. An optimum volume of acetate buffer of 5 mL with pH = 4 was obtained.

Figure 2.

Effect of pH and volume of buffer. Experimental condition: Eriochrome cyanine R concentration = 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ molL⁻¹, concentration of surfactant = 1.5 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹, volume of n-hexane = 11 mL, volume of (more ...)

Effect of surfactants concentration

The effect of surfactant concentration is shown in Figure 3. The volume of surfactants (Brij-35, CTAB and CPC) with the concentration was investigated in the range of 1 × 10⁻⁶ to 8 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹. The differences observed in the signals at various surfactant concentrations are also exposed in Figure 3. At lower concentrations of surfactant, the efficiency was low probably due to the inadequacy of the assemblies to entrap the complex quantitatively. According to this result, all further experiments were carried out at the optimum concentration 1.5 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹ of Brij-35.

Figure 3.

Effect of surfactants concentration. Experimental condition: Eriochrome cyanine R concentration = 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ molL⁻¹, pH = 4, volume of buffer = 5 mL, volume of n-hexane = 11 mL, volume of methanol = 2 mL, standing time = 4 min. (more ...)

Effect of volume of the n-hexane

The effect of volume of the n-hexane on the flotation process was examined in the range of 4–17 mL. By increasing the n-hexane, the volume of the absorbance of extracted content increased up to 11 mL. For thorium, a similar pattern was observed in the volume ranged between 10–17 mL. Therefore 11 mL of n-hexane was selected for subsequent experiments (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Effect of volume of the n-hexane. Experimental condition: Eriochrome cyanine R concentration = 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ molL⁻¹, pH = 4, volume of buffer = 5 mL, concentration of surfactant = 1.5 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹, volume (more ...)

Effect of type and volume of organic solvent

The effect of type and volume of organic solvent (methanol and acetonitrile) on absorbance was also investigated. A volume of 2.5 mL of methanol provided better results compared to acetonitrile (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Effect of type and volume of organic solvent. Experimental condition: Eriochrome cyanine R concentration = 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ molL⁻¹, pH = 4, volume of buffer = 5 mL, concentration of surfactant = 1.5 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹ (more ...)

Standing time

For enhancing the repeatability and efficiency, it is necessary to choose a time in which equilibrium is reached between the organic phase and the aqueous sample. The influence of standing time on the complex formation was studied over a time period of 2–9 min. A standing time of 4 min was needed in order to obtain maximum absorbance (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Standing time. Experimental condition: Eriochrome cyanine R concentration = 1.5 × 10⁻⁵ molL⁻¹, pH = 4, volume of buffer = 5 mL, concentration of surfactant = 1.5 × 10⁻⁶ mol L⁻¹, volume of n-hexane = 11 mL, (more ...)

Conformity with Beers law and figure of merit

Under mentioned optimized conditions, linearity, precision, and limit of detection (LOD) were used for validation of method. The calibration curve was constructed for thorium over the concentration range of between 6–230 ng mL⁻¹. The correlation coefficient (R²) was 0.998 (n = 7), showing the plot was linear for target compound. In order to determine the precision of the analytical procedure, 10 consecutive analyses were performed at about 150 and 30 ng mL⁻¹ level. The relative standard deviation for 150 and 30 ng mL⁻¹ of thorium were determined to be 3.26% and 4.41%, respectively.

The limit of detection for thorium was defined as the concentration of analyte which gave a signal of 3σ above the mean blank signal (where σ is the standard deviation of the blank signal). The LOD for thorium was found to be 1.71 ng mL⁻¹.

Effect of foreign ions

The influences of some cations and anions on the determination of thorium were investigated in detail. A relative error of not greater than ±5% in the recovery at a concentration of 30 ng mL⁻¹ thorium was observed. The tolerance limits of a foreign species were as follows: 1000-fold excess of K⁺, NH⁴⁺, SCN⁻, and NO₃⁻; 500-fold excess of Mn²⁺, ClO₄⁻ and HPO₄²⁻; 400-fold excess of Ba²⁺ and SO₄²⁻; 200-fold excess of CO₃²⁻; and 100-fold excess of Hg²⁺, MoO₄²⁻ and WO₄²⁻ did not interfere with the determination of thorium in this method.

Application of real samples

The proposed method was applied to determine thorium in the natural water and urine samples. Table 1 summarizes the average recovery of thorium in the fortified river waters and urine samples. The water samples were spiked with 20, 30 and 100 ng mL⁻¹ of standard solution of thorium. The recoveries of from the spiked water samples varied in the range of 93.8%–100.3%.

Table 1.

Determination of thorium in 60 mL of water samples and in 5 ml of urine sample (n = 5).

Urine samples were kindly donated by volunteers. Urine was filtered using Whatman No. 42 filter paper and centrifuged. Into a set of 100 mL volumetric flasks, separate aliquots of urine (5 mL) were spiked with varying amounts of thorium (20, 30 and 100 ng mL⁻¹). Finally, the extraction was carried out under the most appropriate conditions. The recoveries of from the spiked urine samples varied in the range of 96.1%–102.8%. The result indicated that the proposed method was applicable for quantitative determination of thorium in water and urine samples.

The characteristics of the proposed method were compared with other methods used for determination of thorium. Table 2 compares the limit of detection (LOD), relative standard deviation (RSD), linear range (LR), extraction time, recovery and matrix using optical chemical sensor,2 ICP-MS and spectrophotometric detection,4 spectrophotometric determination with pyrimidine azo dyes and cetylpyridinium chloride17 and Supercritical fluid extraction.18 The proposed method provided similar quantification extraction efficiency, with advantages of being faster than many other mentioned techniques.

Table 2.

Comparison of different methods for the determination of thorium.

Conclusions

In this study, a fast, simple, sensitive and selective method was proposed for determination of thorium in several water samples in the range of 6–230 ng mL⁻¹. This method provided an efficient and affordable extraction procedure to determinate trace amounts of thorium in real samples. In the case of working with large sample volume solutions of about 100 mL and also small extracting solvent volume (methanol) of 2 mL, a fifty fold preconcentration factor was achieved. The limit of detection in the proposed method was excellent compared to the other reported method.

Footnotes

Disclosure

This manuscript has been read and approved by all authors. This paper is unique and is not under consideration by any other publication and has not been published elsewhere. The authors and peer reviewers of this paper report no conflicts of interest. The authors confirm that they have permission to reproduce any copyrighted material.

References

1. Yousefi SR, Ahmadib SJ, Shemirani F, Jamali MR, Salavati-Niasari M. Simultaneous extraction and preconcentration of uranium and thorium in aqueous samples by new modified mesoporous silica prior to inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry determination. Talanta. 2009;80:212–7. [PubMed]

2. Rastegarzadeh S, Pourreza N, Saeedi I. An optical chemical sensor for thorium (IV) determination based on thorin. J Hazard Mater. 2009;173:110–4. [PubMed]

3. Meng S, Tian M, Liu Y, Guo Y, Fan Y. Spectrophotometric determination of thorium in food using 2-(2,5-disulfonic-4-methoxyphenylazo)-7-2(2-hydroxyl-5-carboxylphenylazo) 1,8dihydrox ynaphthalen-3,6-disulfonic acid. J Anal Chem. 2007;62:946–50.

4. Rozmaric M, Ivsic AG, Grahek Z. Determination of uranium and thorium in complex samples using chromatographic separation, ICP-MS and spectrophotometric detection. Talanta. 2009;80:352–62. [PubMed]

5. Aydin FA, Soylak M. Solid phase extraction and preconcentration of uranium (VI) and thorium (IV) on Duolite XAD761 prior to their inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric determination. Talanta. 2007;72:187–92. [PubMed]

6. Talip Z, Eral M, Hicsonmez U. Adsorption of thorium from aqueous solutions by perlite. J Environ Radioac. 2009;100:139–43. [PubMed]

7. Metaxas M, Kasselouri-Rigopoulou V, Galiatsatou P, Konstantopoulou C, Oikonomou D. thorium removal by different adsorbents. J Hazard Mater. 2003:B97, 71–82.

8. Jain VK, Pandya RA, Pillai SG, Shrivastav PS. Simultaneous preconcentration of uranium (VI) and thorium (IV) from aqueous solution using a chelating calix[4]arene anchored chloromethylated polystyrene solid phase. Talanta. 2006;70:257–66. [PubMed]

9. Torgov VG, Demidova MG, Saprykin AI, Nikolaeva IV, Us TV, Chebykin EP. Extraction preconcentration of uranium and thorium traces in the analysis of bottom sediments by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Anal Chem. 2002;57:303–10.

10. Fujino O, Umetani S, Ueno E, Shigeta K, Matsuda T. Determination of uranium and thorium in apatite minerals by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry with solvent extraction separation into diisobutyl ketone. Anal Chim Acta. 2000;420:65–71.

11. Unsworth ER, Cook JM, Hill SJ. Determination of uranium and thorium in natural waters with a high matrix concentration using solid-phase extraction inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2001;442:141–6.

12. Metilda P, Sanghamitra K, Gladis JM, Naidu GRK, Rao TP. Amberlite XAD-4 functionalized with succinic acid for the solid phase extractive preconcentration and separation of uranium (VI) Talanta. 2004;65:192–200. [PubMed]

13. He Q, Chang X, Wu Q, Huang X, Hu Z, Zhai Y. Synthesis and applications of surface-grafted Th (IV)-imprinted polymers for selective solid-phase extraction of thorium (IV) Anal Chim Acta. 2007;605:192–7. [PubMed]

14. Haleem Khan M, Warwick P, Evans N. Synthesis and applications of surface-grafted Th (IV)-imprinted polymers for selective solid-phase extraction of thorium (IV) Chemosphere. 2006;63:1165–9. [PubMed]

15. Sadeghi S, Mohammadzadeh D, Yamini Y. Solid-phase extraction–spectrophotometric determination of uranium (VI) in natural waters. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2003;375:698–702. [PubMed]

16. Greene PA, Copper CL, Berv DE, Ramsey JD, Collins GE. Colorimetric detection of uranium (VI) on building surfaces after enrichment by solid phase extraction. Talanta. 2005;66:961–6. [PubMed]

17. Amin AS, Mohammed TY. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of thorium and rare earth metals with pyrimidine azo dyes and cetylpyridinium chloride. Talanta. 2001;54:611–20. [PubMed]

18. Kumar P, Pal A, Saxena MK, Ramakumar KL. Supercritical fluid extraction of uranium and thorium from solid matrices. Desalination. 2008;232:71–9.

Articles from Analytical Chemistry Insights are provided here courtesy of
Libertas Academica