PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced


 
Formats
Article sections
Authors
Related links
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Trends Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 February 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3039080
NIHMSID: NIHMS259460
Copyright notice and Disclaimer
Alternative memory in the CD8 lineage
You Jeong Lee, Stephen C. Jameson, and Kristin A. Hogquist
The Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
You Jeong Lee: leey/at/umn.edu; Stephen C. Jameson: james024/at/umn.edu; Kristin A. Hogquist: hogqu001/at/umn.edu
* Corresponding author: Kristin A. Hogquist (hogqu001/at/umn.edu)
Small right arrow pointing to: The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Trends Immunol
Small right arrow pointing to: See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.
Publisher's Disclaimer
Abstract
A prominent population of innate CD8+ T cells develops in the thymus of several gene deficient mouse strains, including Itk, KLF2, CBP, and Id3. These cells have the phenotype and function of memory CD8+ T cells, without previous exposure to antigen. Surprisingly, the cytokine IL-4 plays a key role in their development. As this developmental mechanism was discovered, it came to light that innate CD8+ T cells also exist in normal mice, and in humans. In this review we discuss how these cells develop, compare and contrast them to other CD8 memory cells, and discuss their potential physiological relevance.
 
“Innate T cell” is a term loosely used to describe distinct lineages of cells that develop in the thymus, which have a memory phenotype and upon T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation rapidly secrete large amounts of cytokines. These include cells that are restricted by MHC class Ib molecules that have limited tissue distribution and polymorphism, such as CD1d, Qa-1, H2-M3, and MR-1 [1–3]. Invariant NKT (iNKT) cells are the prototype of cells belonging to this family. Others include CD8αα intraepithelial lymphocytes, and mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAIT cells) [4–7]. These innate T cells share several features in common, such as developmental dependence on IL-15, the SLAM associated adaptor protein (SAP) signaling pathway, and B7-CD28 interactions for functional maturation [8–10]. All of these subsets also share the property of having a highly restricted (oligoclonal) TCR repertoire, implicating specific self-antigens (lipid or peptide) in their development [4].
In 2006, a diverse population of polyclonal CD8+ T cells was described in Tec kinase deficient mice, which shared functional and phenotypic similarity to innate T cells [11, 12]. The ontogeny of these cells had been enigmatic until recently, when it was shown that IL-4 produced by NKT cells drives their development by inducing upregulation of Eomesodermin (Eomes). In this review, we summarize these recent findings and discuss the biological significance of innate CD8+ T cells.
The Tec family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases are important components of the TCR signaling pathway [7, 13]. Among the five Tec subtypes, genetic deficiency of inducible T cell kinase (Itk) was found to alter development of CD8+ T cells in thymus and spleen [11, 12]. In these mice, the majority of CD8 SP thymocytes had a CD24loCD44hiCD122hi memory phenotype and rapidly produced IFNγ in response to TCR stimulation [11, 12]. These cells also expressed the T-box transcription factor Eomes [11], which is associated with expression of CD122 (IL-2 and IL-15 receptor β chain) and secretion of IFNγ in memory CD8+ T cells [14]. However, unlike conventional memory T cells, these cells did not express T-bet. Because such cells resemble innate T cells in terms of their activated/memory phenotype and rapid production of cytokines, they were termed “innate CD8+ T cells” [7, 15].
Subsequent to these pioneering studies, a number of other mice deficient in T cell signaling molecules or transcription factors were shown to have elevated thymic innate CD8+ T cells (Table I). These include the transcription factors kruppel like factor 2 (KLF2) [16, 17], CREB binding protein (CBP) [18], and Inhibitor of DNA binding 3 (Id3) [19]. Mice with a mutation in Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte phosphoprotein of 76 kDa (SLP76:Y145F) [20] were also found to phenocopy the Itk−/− mice in terms of thymic CD8+ T cells. All of the models listed in Table I were shown to have elevated Eomes in CD8+ T cells in the thymus, arguably a hallmark of innate CD8+ T cells. In all models, this was associated with a memory phenotype (CD44hi and CD122hi) and ability to rapidly produce IFNγ when stimulated through the antigen receptor.
Table I
Table I
Multiple gene deficiency models give rise to innate CD8+ T cells
To date, it is unclear how all of these mutations result in a similar phenotype in CD8+ T cells. The Tec family tyrosine kinases are required for full TCR-induced activation of PLC-γ, Ca++ mobilization, and Erk activation. A strong agonistic interaction between T cells and thymic epithelial cells was suggested to program immature thymocytes into T cells that have an innate phenotype and CD8αα co-receptors [32]. Therefore, it was proposed that reduced signal strength due to the lack of Tec kinase activity promotes the survival of T cells with high affinity TCRs, resulting in innate phenotype [7, 13]. Indeed, the development of innate T cells in Itk-deficient mice was partially rescued by the hyperactive form of Erk [12]. Thus a reduced TCR signaling model could be consistent with altered CD8 lineage diversification. However, it was less clear how deficiency in the transcription factors CBP, Id3, or KLF2 would lead to similar phenotypes, particularly for KLF2, which is not expressed in DP thymocytes where Itk-dependent TCR signaling occurs [33]. Ultimately, clues to the initial discovery of the complex mechanism by which innate CD8+ T cells arise came from the experiments using mice deficient for KLF2.
As described, CD8 single positive (SP) thymocytes from KLF2-deficient mice display a marked innate CD8 phenotype, with high levels of CD44, CD122, CXCR3, Eomes, and rapid production of IFNγ. KLF2-deficient mice also have profound peripheral T cell lymphopenia, as this transcription factor is required for T cell trafficking, and in its absence progenitors fail to emigrate from the thymus [34]. To distinguish autonomous and non-autonomous effects in KLF2-deficient mice, unequal mixed bone marrow chimeras were generated (Figure 1a) [16]. When KLF2-deficient bone marrow cells were transferred into irradiated hosts, together with a minority of WT cells, the WT “bystander” CD8 thymocytes adopted an innate CD8 T cell phenotype, similar to the KLF2-deficient thymocytes (Figure 1a, center panel). In contrast, when WT cells were the majority, neither population showed an innate CD8 phenotype (Figure 1a, right panel). These data demonstrate that innate CD8 T cell development in the KLF2-deficient mice is caused by extrinsic factors. Using the same strategy, the generation of Eomes-expressing innate CD8+ T cells in the absence of Itk-, CBP- and Id3-mice was also found to be due to cell extrinsic effects [16, 19].
Figure 1
Figure 1
Innate CD8+ T cells develop via a cell-extrinsic mechanism
The cytokine IL-4 is the extrinsic factor that causes innate CD8 development, because bystander cells that lack IL-4R do not upregulate Eomes, or show any other aspect of the innate phenotype, and they fail to produce IFNγ [16, 19]. Furthermore, when KLF2-, Itk-, or Id3-deficient mice were crossed to IL-4R-deficient mice, innate CD8 T cells did not develop [16, 19]. IL-4 is known to induce Eomes in antigen stimulated CD8+ T cells [35], and Eomes was required for the innate CD8 phenotype in KLF2-deficient mice, indicating that IL-4 exerts its effects via Eomes upregulation [17] (Figure 1b).
In the periphery, IL-4 stimulates naïve and memory CD8+ T cells to proliferate in antigen-induced responses [36]. However, the bystander process occurs in the thymus, where IL-4 presumably acts on naïve CD8 progenitors. Indeed, when IL-4 was added during fetal thymic organ culture, it induced upregulation of Eomes in CD8 SP thymocytes [29]. Therefore, Klf2, Itk and Id3 gene deficiency models clearly share a common mechanism whereby thymic overproduction of IL-4 results in the generation of innate CD8+ T cells (Figure 1b and Table I).
Because the innate CD8 phenotype was dependent on IL-4, it was of interest to determine why the Klf2, Itk and Id3 deficiency models overproduce IL-4. As NKT cells can produce IL-4, it was intriguing that thymocytes in KLF2-deficient mice show an increased expression of promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein (PLZF), a key transcription factor involved in NKT cell development [37]. PLZF is a member of the BTB-zinc finger (BTB-ZF) protein family that controls a wide variety of cellular responses [38], including the proper development of αβ iNKT cells and γδ lineage cells expressing NK1.1, so called γδ NKT cells [21, 39–41]. In the absence of PLZF, most thymic iNKT cells fail to fully differentiate, and remain in the CD24hi immature state. The reduced numbers of peripheral PLZF-deficient iNKT cells express high level of CD62L and lack specific functions, including preferential residence in non-lymphoid organs and rapid secretion of cytokines, especially IL-4 [40, 41]. On the other hand, transgenic over-expression of PLZF in conventional αβ T cells induced homing to non-lymphoid tissue and rapid cytokine production [41, 42].
Considering the crucial role of IL-4 for the generation of innate CD8+ T cells in Itk-, KLF2- and Id3-deficient mice, and the fact that PLZF-deficient iNKT cells lose their ability to secret IL-4, it was hypothesized that PLZF+ cells could be the major source of IL-4 in the thymus [16]. Indeed, mice deficient for KLF2, Itk, or Id3 have an expanded population of PLZF+ cells, which are mostly αβ iNKT in KLF2-deficient mice [16] and γδ NKT cells in Itk- [21, 43] and Id3-deficient mice [19, 22, 23] (Table II). Furthermore, double gene deficiency of PLZF together with Itk, KLF2 or Id3 led to the failure of innate CD8+ T cell development [16, 19].
Table II
Table II
Different types of memory phenotype CD8+ T cells
The accumulation of PLZF+ cells in the thymus could be through enhanced differentiation, survival, or proliferation (Figure 2). The positive role of Itk and Id3 in TCR signaling cascades suggested that Itk- or Id3-deficient γδ T cells might have differentiated to PLZF-expressing cells instead of being negatively selected, due to reduced signaling strength [15]. CBP-deficiency or SLP76:Y145F mutation might lead to a similar process, as they have common defects in Itk-dependent genes after TCR stimulation [18, 20]. As mentioned, however, KLF2 is unlikely to act at the stage where NKT are being selected, as it is not expressed in DP progenitors. KLF2 is known to control T cell migration by modulating cell surface receptor S1P1 and CD62L [34, 44]. Yet, altered cellular migration in KLF2-deficient mice is not likely to be responsible for the accumulation of PLZF+ cells because S1P1 deficiency does not induce an innate CD8+ T cell phenotype [16]. Instead, a more likely hypothesis is that KLF2 deficiency might facilitate the survival or proliferation of PLZF+ cells after selection. This model is consistent with previous findings that KLF2 is sufficient to program a quiescent phenotype in T cells by suppressing c-Myc expression [33], given that c-Myc is critical for iNKT cell proliferation [45]. Therefore, it is possible that Itk, CBP and Id3 act at the selection stage of NKT cells from DP thymocytes and KLF2 regulates the proliferation of NKT cells after this stage (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Various genes act at distinct stages to expand three types of PLZF+ cells
In the various gene deficient mice discussed, expanded PLZF+ αβ or γδ NKT cells regulate the development of innate CD8+ T cells in the thymus via production of IL-4. But does a similar pathway regulate CD8+ T cells in normal mice? Interestingly, inbred strains of mice were shown to vary in their frequency of iNKT cells, with BALB/c mice on the high end of the spectrum, and C57BL/6 mice on the low end [46, 47]. BALB/c mice have 3–5 times higher numbers of PLZF+ cells in the thymus compared to C57BL/6 mice, with the majority of them being iNKT in BALB/c mice. Interestingly, CD8 SP thymocytes from BALB/c (but not C57BL/6) mice contain a distinct subpopulation of EomeshiT-betloCD44hiCD122hi innate phenotype CD8+ T cells that produce IFNγ. As in the various gene deficient models, this innate phenotype is dependent on IL-4 produced by NKT cells, because it is eliminated in BALB/c Il4r−/− and BALB/c Cd1d−/− mice [16]. Therefore, the developmental regulation of innate CD8+ T cells by PLZF+ population is not only a phenotype of some gene deficient mice, but also a physiological process in inbred mouse strains.
CIITA transgenic mice also produce an enlarged population of PLZF+ CD4+ T cells in the thymus [1, 26]. CIITA is a transcriptional activator of MHC class II expression, and in CIITAtg mice thymocytes express MHC Class II. This model system [27, 28] was first designed to investigate the functional significance of CD4+ T cells that could potentially develop by thymocyte-thymocyte interactions (T-T CD4+ T cells), because human thymocytes, unlike mouse thymocytes, express MHC class II molecules on their surface [26, 48]. Thus it was hypothesized that CD4+ T cells could be positively selected by MHC II expressed on other thymocytes, which was confirmed in an in vitro reaggregate culture system [49]. In subsequent experiments using CIITAtg mice, T-T CD4+ T cells were found to have a striking similarity to iNKT cells, including IL-4 secretion upon activation, acquisition of memory markers [26], and developmental dependence on SLAM-SAP mediated signaling pathway [31]. Remarkably, about 30~40% of polyclonal CD4 SP thymocytes in CIITAtg mice expressed PLZF (Figure 2), suggesting that T-T interactions during selection are critical for specifying an “NKT-like” T cell lineage, even when the restricting element was conventional MHC class II.
Interestingly, in CIITAtg mice, almost all TCRαhi CD8 SP thymocytes had CD24loCD44hiCD122hi memory phenotype with upregulated eomes and CXCR3 expression [29]. Similar to the described gene-deficient mice, and wild type BALB/c mice, increased numbers of CD8+ T cells in CIITAtg mice were normalized in CIITAtg Il4−/− and CIITAtg Stat6−/− mice, demonstrating that IL-4 and its signaling pathway are essential [27]. Of note, transgenic PLZF over-expression using a Cd4 promoter failed to induce the development of innate CD8+ T cells in wild type mice [29], indicating the potential need for additional signaling pathways or a specific PLZF gene dosage for IL-4 production in PLZF+ cells.
The expression of HLA-DR in human thymocytes peaks during the fetal to perinatal stage and gradually decreases in postnatal thymocytes, and becomes virtually absent from 3~4 years old onwards [48]. The phenotype in CIITAtg mice reflected that of human fetal thymocytes, in which up to 8% of CD4 SP thymocytes and 15% of splenic CD4+ T cells expressed PLZF and up to 10% of CD8 SP thymocytes and 30% of splenic CD8+ T cells were positive for Eomes during the 2nd trimester of gestation [26, 29]. The presence of a high percentage of CD122+CD161+ memory phenotype T cells in the fetus, which is generally considered to be free from gut microbiota or foreign antigenic challenge [50], suggests these cells are unlikely to be true memory cells, but to have developed through an alternative pathway (Table II). Although human thymocytes express MHC class II and SLAM molecules in the neonatal period, the newborn human thymus or cord blood contains few PLZF+ CD4+ T cells, or Eomes expressing CD8+ T cells, the reason for which needs further investigation [26]. Nonetheless, it is interesting that MHC class II- and CD1d-dependent thymocyte-thymocyte interactions share a common thymic ontogeny in humans and mice respectively, and this suggests that IL-4 might be involved in generating Eomes-expressing CD8+ T cells in humans as well.
Conventional memory T cells develop as naïve T cells in the thymus and become activated in the periphery by recognition of foreign antigen in an inflammatory context (i.e. infection) (Table II and Figure 3). Innate CD8+ T cells phenotypically resemble memory T cells, yet do not require antigen experience to obtain this status, demonstrated by the fact that OT-I Rag−/− cells adopt a memory phenotype and function when present as bystander cells in KLF2-deficient mixed bone marrow chimeras [16]. In this regard, innate CD8+ T cells resemble homeostatic (or virtual) memory T cells [51], which are generated in peripheral lymphoid organs in lymphopenic animals, in response to IL-7, IL-15 and self MHC-peptide [52, 53] (Table II and Figure 3). On the other hand, innate CD8+ T cells develop in the thymus in an IL-4 dependent manner (and presumably in response to self MHC-peptide). Are these 3 subsets of memory cells functionally equivalent? Certainly the fact that homeostatic and innate memory CD8+ T cells do not require foreign antigen recognition for their generation means that that they are unlikely to play a critical role in secondary infections as do conventional memory CD8+ T cells that were clonally expanded during a primary response (Figure 3). However, there is growing evidence for an “innate” role of memory CD8+ T cells in primary infections, as sensors of an inflammatory environment [54]. For example, conventional memory OT-I T cells can produce IFNγ early on during infection with pathogens that do not encode the ovalbumin antigen [55]. This response could be induced by IL-12 and IL-18 produced by activated myeloid cells [54, 56, 57]. Furthermore, this response is protective, at least in the context where no other cells can produce IFNγ [55]. Both homeostatic and innate CD8+ memory cells also produce IFNγ in response to IL-12 and IL-18 [17, 51]. Therefore it would seem most likely that homeostatic memory and innate CD8+ T cells play roles early during infection, via production of IFNγ. In the human immune system, these types of non-conventional or unprimed CD8+ T cells could be important as they are able to participate in host defense during the neonatal and early childhood period before conventional memory networks are established [1, 16, 26].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multiple pathways to becoming memory-phenotype cells
Whereas conventional memory CD8+ T cells are composed of heterogenous subsets expressing T-bet and Eomes [58], innate CD8+ T cells selectively express Eomes. There is a complex interplay between Eomes and T-bet in the generation of central and effector memory responses, with expression of T-bet being generally associated with good effector responses [14], and Eomes with long-lived memory responses. Therefore, the lifespan and role of innate CD8+ T cells in the development of protective immunity remains to be investigated.
IL-4 is not typically associated with the generation of protective CD8+ T cell responses. The ability of IL-4 to drive expression of Eomes, CXCR3, and IFNγ production in CD8+ T cells is counterintuitive, given its role in CD4 helper responses, where it promotes a Th2 response, and suppresses a T-bet-mediated Th1 response [59]. However, the effect of IL-4 on CD8+ T cells is not without precedent in the literature. Complexes of IL-4–anti-IL-4 drive the proliferation of CD8+ T cells [36, 60]. In fact, IL-4 is a potent growth factor for memory CD8+ T cells at doses produced during normal immune responses [36]. In addition, IL-4 supports the proliferation [61] and conversion of naïve CD8+ T cells into memory phenotype CD8 T cells in lymphopenic mice [62].
There is an important role for IL-4 in the development of CD8+ T cell protective anti-malaria immunity, in which IL-4R deficient CD8+ T cells specific for circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium yoelii fail to develop into tissue-residing memory cells [63, 64]. Interestingly, wild type BALB/c mice are much more effective than C57BL/6 strains at controlling malaria pathogens after immunization with radiation inactivated forms of P. berghei or P. yoelii sporozoites [65], which might be related to the high frequency of innate CD8+ T cells in the BALB/c strain.
Until now, three types of PLZF+ cells – αβ iNKT, γδ NKT and T-T CD4+ T cells – have been identified in the thymus. Under certain conditions each of these can facilitate the development of innate CD8+ T cells in mice and humans. Genetic evidence proved conclusively that IL-4 is required for this developmental effect. To date, it is not clear what stimuli cause NKT cells to produce IL-4 in the steady state. Interestingly, TLR signaling was recently shown to cause antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to present stimulatory self-lipids, through inhibition of α-galactosidase activity [66]. Perhaps endogenous signals can also cause α-galactosidase inhibition in thymic APCs, and these differ between inbred strains of mice. Regardless of the source, these findings highlight IL-4 as an important cytokine for the biology of memory CD8 T cells. Future work should focus on potential differences in the function of memory cells that are generated in an IL-4-dependent fashion, particularly as they are known to have skewed expression of T-box transcription factors. Since many pathogens, such as parasites, induce a strong IL-4 response, it will be interesting to determine how the CD8 response is qualitatively different in these infections compared to bacterial and viral infections that induce a primarily Th1 response.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants to KAH (AI39560) and SCJ (AI38903).
Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
1. Lee YJ, et al. MHC class II-dependent T-T interactions create a diverse, functional and immunoregulatory reaction circle. Immunol Cell Biol. 2009;87:65–71. [PubMed]
2. Urdahl KB, et al. Positive selection of MHC class Ib-restricted CD8(+) T cells on hematopoietic cells. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:772–779. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Kumanovics A, et al. Genomic organization of the mammalian MHC. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:629–657. [PubMed]
4. Treiner E, Lantz O. CD1d- and MR1-restricted invariant T cells: of mice and men. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18:519–526. [PubMed]
5. Johansson-Lindbom B, Agace WW. Generation of gut-homing T cells and their localization to the small intestinal mucosa. Immunol Rev. 2007;215:226–242. [PubMed]
6. Lambolez F, et al. Thymic differentiation of TCR alpha beta(+) CD8 alpha alpha(+) IELs. Immunol Rev. 2007;215:178–188. [PubMed]
7. Prince AL, et al. The Tec kinases Itk and Rlk regulate conventional versus innate T-cell development. Immunol Rev. 2009;228:115–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Veillette A, et al. Consequence of the SLAM-SAP signaling pathway in innate-like and conventional lymphocytes. Immunity. 2007;27:698–710. [PubMed]
9. Zheng X, et al. Modulation of NKT cell development by B7-CD28 interaction: an expanding horizon for costimulation. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2703. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Horai R, et al. Requirements for selection of conventional and innate T lymphocyte lineages. Immunity. 2007;27:775–785. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Atherly LO, et al. The Tec family tyrosine kinases Itk and Rlk regulate the development of conventional CD8+ T cells. Immunity. 2006;25:79–91. [PubMed]
12. Broussard C, et al. Altered development of CD8+ T cell lineages in mice deficient for the Tec kinases Itk and Rlk. Immunity. 2006;25:93–104. [PubMed]
13. Readinger JA, et al. Tec kinases regulate T-lymphocyte development and function: new insights into the roles of Itk and Rlk/Txk. Immunol Rev. 2009;228:93–114. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Intlekofer AM, et al. Effector and memory CD8+ T cell fate coupled by T-bet and eomesodermin. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1236–1244. [PubMed]
15. Berg LJ. Signalling through TEC kinases regulates conventional versus innate CD8(+) T-cell development. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:479–485. [PubMed]
16. Weinreich MA, et al. T cells expressing the transcription factor PLZF regulate the development of memory-like CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:709–716. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Weinreich MA, et al. KLF2 transcription-factor deficiency in T cells results in unrestrained cytokine production and upregulation of bystander chemokine receptors. Immunity. 2009;31:122–130. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Fukuyama T, et al. Histone acetyltransferase CBP is vital to demarcate conventional and innate CD8+ T-cell development. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3894–3904. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Verykokakis M, et al. SAP protein-dependent natural killer T-like cells regulate the development of CD8(+) T cells with innate lymphocyte characteristics. Immunity. 2010;33:203–215. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Jordan MS, et al. Complementation in trans of altered thymocyte development in mice expressing mutant forms of the adaptor molecule SLP76. Immunity. 2008;28:359–369. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Felices M, et al. Tec kinase Itk in gammadeltaT cells is pivotal for controlling IgE production in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:8308–8313. [PubMed]
22. Alonzo ES, et al. Development of promyelocytic zinc finger and ThPOK-expressing innate gamma delta T cells is controlled by strength of TCR signaling and Id3. J Immunol. 2010;184:1268–1279. [PubMed]
23. Lauritsen JP, et al. Marked induction of the helix-loop-helix protein Id3 promotes the gammadelta T cell fate and renders their functional maturation Notch independent. Immunity. 2009;31:565–575. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Ueda-Hayakawa I, et al. Id3 restricts the developmental potential of gamma delta lineage during thymopoiesis. J Immunol. 2009;182:5306–5316. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Verykokakis M, et al. Inhibitor of DNA binding 3 limits development of murine slam-associated adaptor protein-dependent “innate” gammadelta T cells. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Lee YJ, et al. Generation of PLZF+ CD4+ T cells via MHC class II-dependent thymocyte-thymocyte interaction is a physiological process in humans. J Exp Med. 2010;207:237–246. S231–237. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Li W, et al. An alternate pathway for CD4 T cell development: thymocyte-expressed MHC class II selects a distinct T cell population. Immunity. 2005;23:375–386. [PubMed]
28. Choi EY, et al. Thymocyte-thymocyte interaction for efficient positive selection and maturation of CD4 T cells. Immunity. 2005;23:387–396. [PubMed]
29. Lee HSM, Jeon Yoon Kyeong, Kang Byung Hyun, Kim Eun Ji, Jung Kyeong Cheon, Chang Cheong-Hee, Park Seong Hoe. MHC class II-restricted PLZF expressing CD4+ T cells convert CD8+ T cells into an innate phenotype. 2010. submitted.
30. Patel DR, et al. Constitutive expression of CIITA directs CD4 T cells to produce Th2 cytokines in the thymus. Cell Immunol. 2005;233:30–40. [PubMed]
31. Li W, et al. The SLAM-associated protein signaling pathway is required for development of CD4+ T cells selected by homotypic thymocyte interaction. Immunity. 2007;27:763–774. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Yamagata T, et al. Self-reactivity in thymic double-positive cells commits cells to a CD8 alpha alpha lineage with characteristics of innate immune cells. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:597–605. [PubMed]
33. Buckley AF, et al. Transcription factor LKLF is sufficient to program T cell quiescence via a c-Myc--dependent pathway. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:698–704. [PubMed]
34. Carlson CM, et al. Kruppel-like factor 2 regulates thymocyte and T-cell migration. Nature. 2006;442:299–302. [PubMed]
35. Takemoto N, et al. Cutting Edge: IL-12 inversely regulates T-bet and eomesodermin expression during pathogen-induced CD8+ T cell differentiation. J Immunol. 2006;177:7515–7519. [PubMed]
36. Morris SC, et al. Endogenously produced IL-4 nonredundantly stimulates CD8+ T cell proliferation. J Immunol. 2009;182:1429–1438. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. D’Cruz LM, et al. Transcriptional regulation of NKT cell development and homeostasis. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22:199–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Kelly KF, Daniel JM. POZ for effect--POZ-ZF transcription factors in cancer and development. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16:578–587. [PubMed]
39. Kreslavsky T, et al. TCR-inducible PLZF transcription factor required for innate phenotype of a subset of gammadelta T cells with restricted TCR diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:12453–12458. [PubMed]
40. Kovalovsky D, et al. The BTB-zinc finger transcriptional regulator PLZF controls the development of invariant natural killer T cell effector functions. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1055–1064. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Savage AK, et al. The transcription factor PLZF directs the effector program of the NKT cell lineage. Immunity. 2008;29:391–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Raberger J, et al. The transcriptional regulator PLZF induces the development of CD44 high memory phenotype T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17919–17924. [PubMed]
43. Qi Q, et al. Enhanced development of CD4+ gammadelta T cells in the absence of Itk results in elevated IgE production. Blood. 2009;114:564–571. [PubMed]
44. Bai A, et al. Kruppel-like factor 2 controls T cell trafficking by activating L-selectin (CD62L) and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 transcription. J Immunol. 2007;178:7632–7639. [PubMed]
45. Dose M, et al. Intrathymic proliferation wave essential for Valpha14+ natural killer T cell development depends on c-Myc. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:8641–8646. [PubMed]
46. Rymarchyk SL, et al. Widespread natural variation in murine natural killer T-cell number and function. Immunology. 2008;125:331–343. [PubMed]
47. Hammond KJ, et al. CD1d-restricted NKT cells: an interstrain comparison. J Immunol. 2001;167:1164–1173. [PubMed]
48. Park SH, et al. HLA-DR expression in human fetal thymocytes. Hum Immunol. 1992;33:294–298. [PubMed]
49. Choi EY, et al. Thymocytes positively select thymocytes in human system. Hum Immunol. 1997;54:15–20. [PubMed]
50. Blumer N, et al. Development of mucosal immune function in the intrauterine and early postnatal environment. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007;23:655–660. [PubMed]
51. Haluszczak C, et al. The antigen-specific CD8+ T cell repertoire in unimmunized mice includes memory phenotype cells bearing markers of homeostatic expansion. J Exp Med. 2009;206:435–448. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Surh CD, Sprent J. Homeostasis of naive and memory T cells. Immunity. 2008;29:848–862. [PubMed]
53. Takada K, Jameson SC. Naive T cell homeostasis: from awareness of space to a sense of place. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:823–832. [PubMed]
54. Berg RE, Forman J. The role of CD8 T cells in innate immunity and in antigen non-specific protection. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18:338–343. [PubMed]
55. Berg RE, et al. Memory CD8+ T cells provide innate immune protection against Listeria monocytogenes in the absence of cognate antigen. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1583–1593. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Berg RE, et al. Relative contributions of NK and CD8 T cells to IFN-gamma mediated innate immune protection against Listeria monocytogenes. J Immunol. 2005;175:1751–1757. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Berg RE, et al. Contribution of CD8+ T cells to innate immunity: IFN-gamma secretion induced by IL-12 and IL-18. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32:2807–2816. [PubMed]
58. Jameson SC, Masopust D. Diversity in T cell memory: an embarrassment of riches. Immunity. 2009;31:859–871. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Murphy KM, Reiner SL. The lineage decisions of helper T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:933–944. [PubMed]
60. Boyman O, et al. Selective stimulation of T cell subsets with antibody-cytokine immune complexes. Science. 2006;311:1924–1927. [PubMed]
61. Tan JT, et al. IL-7 is critical for homeostatic proliferation and survival of naive T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:8732–8737. [PubMed]
62. Ueda N, et al. CD1d-restricted NKT cell activation enhanced homeostatic proliferation of CD8+ T cells in a manner dependent on IL-4. Int Immunol. 2006;18:1397–1404. [PubMed]
63. Carvalho LH, et al. IL-4-secreting CD4+ T cells are crucial to the development of CD8+ T-cell responses against malaria liver stages. Nat Med. 2002;8:166–170. [PubMed]
64. Morrot A, et al. IL-4 receptor expression on CD8+ T cells is required for the development of protective memory responses against liver stages of malaria parasites. J Exp Med. 2005;202:551–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
65. Schmidt NW, et al. Extreme CD8 T cell requirements for anti-malarial liver-stage immunity following immunization with radiation attenuated sporozoites. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000998. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Darmoise A, et al. Lysosomal alpha-galactosidase controls the generation of self lipid antigens for natural killer T cells. Immunity. 2010;33:216–228. [PubMed]