Our findings indicate that KSR1 is a functional protein kinase that, along with MEK1 protein kinase activity, is required for protection against TNF-induced cell death. The observation that MEK associated with wild-type KSR1 had increased phosphorylation, together with our in vitro kinase assays using recombinant proteins, suggest that KSR1 is capable of direct phosphorylation of MEK. Interestingly, while phosphorylation of rMEK in the MEK activation loop was detected for both recombinant and mammalian, only immunoprecipitated mammalian KSR1 was able to promote rMEK activation. With limited prior demonstration of KSR1 kinase activity, the results presented here clearly show KSR1 as a functional protein kinase that promotes cell survival in the presence of TNF. This finding has implications for chronic inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in which the cytotoxic effect of TNF contributes to epithelial cell loss and epithelial barrier dysfunction further exacerbating disease.
Activation of the ERK cascade is a key component for cell survival in a number of cell types [
45–
49]. While the ability of KSR1 to scaffold and sensitize the ERK pathway is known [
22,
50,
51], the catalytic function of KSR1 is not well understood. We found that colon epithelial cells lacking KSR1, or stably expressing a kinase-inactive KSR1, are sensitive to TNF-induced apoptosis (). Interestingly, inhibition of MEK protein kinase activity sensitized +KSR1 cells to TNF-induced cell loss whereas +vector and +D683A/D700A cells had no potentiation in cell loss (). This suggests that the protective role of KSR1 kinase activity requires MEK kinase activity. The importance of MEK1 is appreciated from early development since
MEK1−/− mice are embryonic lethal due to placental defects [
52]. In addition, an inducible tissue-specific deletion of MEK1 in the epidermis causes apoptosis in keratinocytes, demonstrating a role for MEK1 in cell survival [
53]. It is conceivable that wild-type KSR1 promotes cell survival by augmenting MEK kinase activity independent of KSR1 catalytic function in a manner similar to KSR1-Raf-1 interactions [
24,
54]. However, this cannot fully explain our observations since +D683A/D700A associates with MEK similar to wild-type KSR1, yet +D683A/D700A-expressing cells are just as sensitive to TNF-induced apoptosis as cells lacking KSR1 (). We cannot rule out the possibility that expression of wild-type KSR1 induces a different protein expression profile compared to cells expressing +vector and +D683A/D700A that necessitates MEK kinase activity in TNF-mediated cell survival of +KSR1 cells.
Previous studies using KSR1 immunoprecipitates from cultured cells show that KSR1 autophosphorylates and phosphorylates Raf-1 in response to ceramide [
21,
23,
38,
43]. While our results indicate that recombinant KSR1 autophosphorylates exclusively on serine, consistent with previous data [
55], ceramide was not required for recombinant KSR1 protein kinase activity
in vitro ( & ). Though these data seem to conflict with previous studies demonstrating a role for ceramide in mammalian KSR1 activation [
21,
23,
38,
43], it may provide insight into the mechanism by which KSR1 kinase activity is regulated. For instance, in addition to associating and activating KSR1 at the plasma membrane [
24,
38], KSR1 interaction with ceramide in the KSR1 CA3 domain may promote the release of a negative regulatory mechanism mediated by KSR1-associated protein(s). The 14-3-3 family of proteins bind KSR1 when phosphorylated at Ser
297 and Ser
392 and, like Raf-1, dissociate upon dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) [
25,
56–
61]. Thus, expression of KSR1 in
E. coli circumvents negative regulation by associated proteins allowing recombinant KSR1 to adopt an active conformation. In this model, a requirement for ceramide would not be essential for KSR1 activation. Alternatively, the kinase activity of KSR1 could be allosterically modulated intramolecularly. In this instance, KSR1 kinase activity could be modulated by ceramide, either directly or indirectly, to facilitate such an intramolecular interaction. In the original mutagenesis screen carried out in
D. melanogaster, a weak loss of function allele mapped to a double amino acid substitution within the KSR1 CA1 domain. While this mutation was later shown to reduce KSR1 association with Raf-1 approximately two-fold, MEK phosphorylation was completely abolished following an
in vitro kinase assay [
62]. Interestingly, recombinant KSR1 lacking the N-terminal CA1 domain (rKSR1ΔCA1) did not function as an active kinase (). These data suggest that in addition to Raf-1 association, the CA1 domain is involved in regulating the kinase activity of KSR1 and potentially contributes to Raf-1 activation directly or enhances Raf-1 activity possibly through an allosteric mechanism. In addition, the KSR1 kinase domain (rKSR1ΔN521) alone did not function as a constitutively active protein kinase (), consistent with previous findings [
22,
43]. This is unlike Raf-1 where expression of the kinase domain alone results in a constitutively active enzyme and indicates that KSR1 catalytic function requires a full-length protein [
63,
64]. An example of such an intramolecular interaction is also observed for class II dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinases (DYRKs), which also require an N-terminal region outside the kinase domain to modulate protein kinase activity and autophosphorylation [
65].
The finding that MEK1 is a KSR1 substrate raises new questions about the potential mechanisms that modulate signal transduction in the ERK pathway. The data presented here show that rKSR1 can phosphorylate rMEK1 on at least one serine residue within the MEK1 activation loop ( & ). These serine residues in the MEK activation loop are reported to be both necessary and sufficient for phosphorylation of ERK [
35,
36]. Interestingly, while rKSR1 phosphorylation of rMEK was insufficient to stimulate phosphorylation of rERK2 (), MEK activation was detected when using immunoprecipitated KSR1 from mammalian cells (). KSR1 expressed in mammalian cells may possess post-translational modifications that promote more efficient activation of rMEK or KSR1 activity. Even so, previous observations with MEK kinase-1 (MEKK1) indicate complexity in MEK activation. While MEKK1 transfected into 293 cells readily phosphorylated MEK1 and MEK2 at these serine residues, it did not result in phosphorylation of ERK2 [
66]. This data, combined with our data presented here, suggest that MEK activation is regulated, at least in part, by additional factors that likely vary with the type of stimulus or expression system. Nonetheless, the
in vivo contribution of KSR1 kinase activity towards MEK may function to sensitize MEK activation by Raf-1 and lower the threshold for activation of the ERK pathway. It is also conceivable that KSR1 kinase activity alters ERK activation by maintaining a level of MEK activation loop phosphorylation once the activated Raf-KSR1-MEK complex dissociates following stimulation. The spatiotemporal control of ERK activation is known to alter the physiological responses downstream of both TNF receptor-1 and staphylococcal enterotoxin E-mediated T cell activation [
2,
50].
For over a decade, KSR1 has been appreciated as a scaffold of the ERK pathway that coordinates pathway activation, yet the enzymatic contributions of KSR1 have remained controversial [
10,
11,
24,
67,
68]. The data presented here demonstrate that KSR1 contains intrinsic protein kinase activity
in vitro and suggests a mechanism by which KSR1 can sensitize the ERK signaling through direct phosphorylation of MEK1. KSR1 and other protein kinases have been classified as pseudokinases based on variation in conserved amino acid residue(s) within the kinase domain (reviewed in [
69]). Even so, the maintenance of a highly conserved protein kinase domain throughout evolution, and the demonstration of protein kinase activity from other unique protein kinases [
20,
70], imparts significance to these proteins and their potential enzymatic function. Our observation that the catalytic activity of KSR1 protects colonic epithelial cells from TNF-induced apoptosis provides a potential mechanism by which the intestinal epithelial barrier can be maintained in the presence of pathological concentrations of TNF. For patients suffering from IBD, anti-TNF therapy is beneficial and able to induce remission. Yet, the long-term side effects, and concomitant immunosuppressive therapy, highlight the need for novel strategies that reduce inflammation by promoting epithelial cell survival within the inflammatory microenvironment (reviewed in [
71]). Therefore, understanding the precise mechanisms that modulate the ERK pathway downstream of TNF could lead to new therapeutic targets for patients afflicted with chronic inflammatory diseases.