PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Inorg Chem. Author manuscript; available in PMC Oct 4, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3033777
NIHMSID: NIHMS267617
The Population of SAP and TSAP Isomers in Cyclen-Based Lanthanide(III) Chelates Is Substantially Affected by Solvent
Kyle J. Miller, Ali A. Saherwala, Benjamin C. Webber, Yunkou Wu, A. Dean Sherry,§ and Mark Woods*||
Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W. Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 7080
Department of Chemistry, Portland State University, 1719 SW 10th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201
§ Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5325 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75235
|| Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, Oregon 97239
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. mark.woods/at/pdx.edu or ; woodsmar/at/ohsu.edu
Abstract
The square antiprism/twisted square antiprism ratio in LnDOTA-tetraamide chelates is a critical parameter in governing water-exchange kinetics and ultimately the utility of a chelate as a PARACEST MRI contrast agent. In LnDOTA-tetraamide chelates with tertiary amides, this ratio and the rate of interconversion between these two structural isomers are found to be dramatically dependent upon the solvent and possibly other local environmental factors.
The realization that Ln3+ chelates with slowly exchanging inner-sphere water molecules could induce magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast through a paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (PARACEST) mechanism has given rise to a recent upsurge in interest in LnDOTA-tetraamide chelates.1,2 The large paramagnetic hyperfine chemical shifts induced by anisotropic 4f electrons effectively shift the resonance of the inner-sphere water far from that of solvent water. However, because unchelated Ln3+ ions are toxic, suitable chelating ligands must be employed that both eliminate the toxic effects3 of these ions and appropriately slow water exchange.1,2,4,5 Ligands derived from cyclen have been widely accepted in the development of MRI contrast agents,3 and the related DOTA-tetraamide ligands (Chart 1) are now widely studied as PARACEST agents. Although DOTA-tetraamide chelates are kinetically inert, retaining the Ln3+ ion throughout the in vivo residence of the chelate,6,7 the use of DOTA-tetraamide ligands in vivo can be problematic. It has been shown that only when the cationic nature of these chelates is offset by anionic substituents, such as carboxylates, can the severe toxic effects intrinsic to cationic chelates be avoided at the relatively high dosing levels required for MRI.6 A chelate incorporating four glycinateamide substituents has been shown to be safe for in vivo use.6,7 The unique water-exchange characteristics of these chelates make them attractive as MRI sensors of various biological species such as glucose, Zn2+, or protons (pH),811 but this normally requires the addition of side-chain substituents that act as binding sites for such species. In such situations, it may be desirable to incorporate the offsetting negative charges as tertiary amide substituents, leaving the sensing secondary amide substituents in place.
Chart 1
Chart 1
Structures of Macrocyclic Ligands Discussed in This Work
However, DOTA-tetraamides with tertiary amide pendant arms have not been widely studied as PARACEST agents. Of particular relevance is the coordination chemistry of these chelates. LnDOTA-tetraamide chelates can adopt both a monocapped square antiprismatic (SAP) and a monocapped twisted square antiprismatic (TSAP) coordination geometry,4,5 and it has been shown that water exchange in complexes that form a TSAP isomer is 1–2 orders of magnitude faster than that in complexes that form a SAP isomer.4,5,12 Given the requirement for slow exchange kinetics in putative PARACEST agents, it is clearly preferable for the SAP coordination geometry to predominate. Indeed, to our knowledge, the rate of exchange observed in the TSAP isomers of these complexes is so fast that CEST arising from this species has not been observed.
The only substantive literature contributions concerning tertiary LnDOTA-tetraamides are reports about the simple dimethyl ligand, DOTTA (Chart 1).4,5 This ligand is notable in that, unlike other simple tetraamides such as DOTAM and DTMA, it was reported to exhibit a strong (2:1) preference for the TSAP coordination geometry in D2O. However, in secondary amide systems, larger substituents have generally been found to have an overwhelming preference for the SAP isomer.13,14 This raised the question of what happens in tertiary DOTA-tetraamide systems in which larger substituents are employed. In response, the structural isomerism of some symmetrically substituted tertiary DOTA-tetraamide chelates are examined herein.
Ligands 1, 2, and DOTTA were prepared by condensation of the appropriate secondary amine with a haloacetyl halide (CH2Cl2/K2CO3); the resulting haloacetamides were then used to alkylate cyclen under standard conditions.5,13 After purification by either column chromatography or reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), as appropriate, Ln3+ complexes of each ligand were prepared from the corresponding Ln(OTf)3 salt. Because the nature of the counterion in this type of complex is known to affect the structure and water-exchange properties of the complex,15 triflate counterions were used throughout this work to eliminate changes in behavior arising from differences in the counterion. Our initial hypothesis was that the SAP/TSAP ratio across the Ln series could be examined by 1H NMR by taking advantage of the known difference in the chemical shifts of the axial ring protons (axS) to both identify and quantify each coordination isomer.16,17 However, the SAP and TSAP isomers are in dynamic equilibrium, interconverting through either pendant arm rotation or flipping of the macrocyclic ring conformation.18,19 If this interconversion is fast on the NMR time scale, then identifying and quantifying the two isomeric forms of a chelate can only be achieved by lowering the temperature, something that may necessitate changing solvents. To resolve two isomers of EuDOTTA in CD3CN, the temperature was lowered to 233K. Once resolved (Figure 1), it is clear that the distribution of SAP and TSAP isomers in CD3CN (mole fraction of the SAP isomer, xSAP=0.67) is dramatically different from that published previously (D2O, 273 K),5xSAP=0.33. It has been reported that a change in the solvent from D2O to CD3CN can increase xSAP of EuDOTAM from 0.80 to 0.97.5 However, such a change is relatively modest in comparison to that observed here for EuDOTTA in which the dominant isomer is opposite in the two solvents. In addition to a change in the the isomeric distribution, a change in the solvent also substanitally affects the rate of isomer interconversion and hence the low-temperature requirement to resolve the two isomeric forms.
Figure 1
Figure 1
1H NMR spectra of EuDOTTA (top) and Yb1 (bottom) focusing on the highly shifted axS resonance. Spectra were acquired at 400MHz inD2O at 300K(left) and in CD3CN at 233K (right). Note that the hyperfine shifts of these resonances cannot be compared from (more ...)
The rate of isomeric interconversion was also found to be accelerated for Yb1 upon a change of the solvent fromD2O to CD3CN. However, this change in the solvent had an effect upon the mole fraction xSAP opposite to that observed with EuDOTTA, dropping from 0.82 in D2O to 0.72 in CD3CN (Figure 1). This suggests that the nature of the trend with a change in the solvent may be Ln3+ ion specific, given the strong relationship between the SAP/TSAP ratio and the Ln3+ ionic radius. Nonetheless, the strong solvent dependency was found to hold for all Ln3+ chelates tested with this ligand.
Eu2 is not readily soluble in water, but spectra could be obtained in CD3OD and CD3CN. In this tetraamide system, the TSAP isomer predominated in CD3CN (xSAP = 0.05), while the SAP isomer predominated (xSAP=0.70) in the protic solvent, CD3OD(Figure 2). The dependence of the isomeric distribution upon the nature of the solvent is also not confined to LnDOTA-tetraamide chelates. For example, in the cyclen tetrapyridyl complexes, Ln3, the crystal and solution state structures of which have been described elsewhere,20,21 was also found to be highly affected by the nature of the solvent. xSAP for Eu3 was found to drop from 0.85 to 0.50 upon a change in the solvent fromD2OtoCD3CN(Figure 3).
Figure 2
Figure 2
1H NMR spectra of Eu2 focusing on the highly shifted axS resonance. Spectra were acquired at 400 MHz in CD3CN at 233 K (left) and in CD3OD at 298 K (right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
1H NMR spectra of Eu3 focusing on the highly shifted axS resonance. Spectra were acquired at 400MHz and 300K in D2O (left) and CD3CN (right).
The origins of these profound solvent-dependent changes in the isomeric distribution are unclear. Because the counterion was triflate in all cases, the nature of the counterion can at least be ruled out. However, a change in the solvent may alter the interaction between a cationic chelate and its anions, which may translate into changes in isomerism. However, the fact that a change from a protic to an aprotic solvent does not result in the same consistent trend in isomerism tends to suggest that the underlying cause is more complex than the simple disruption of ionic interaction.
The luminescent properties of Eu3+ provide a valuable means of probing its coordination environment and, in particular, the nature of the capping axial ligand. Axial ligands of differing polarizability can substantially alter Bleaney’s B02 ligand-field parameter,22 giving rise to changes in the 1H NMR hyperfine shifts and the splitting of the 5D07F1 emission band.23 SAP/TSAP isomerism has a similar effect on both of these parameters;24,25 however, incorrectly assigning either isomeric form as a result of such changes can be discounted because both isomeric forms can be identified in each case. Nonetheless, the commonality of this effect frustrated our attempts to probe the emission spectra of these Eu3+ chelates for clues as to the origin of the changes in isomerism with a change in the solvent. The emission spectra of these chelates are provided in the Supporting Information for further examination (Figures S1 and S2). This leaves only the hydration state of the Eu3+ ion available for exploration. H2O and D2O were titrated into separate samples of Eu2 and Eu3 in dry CH3CN, and the hydration state of the Eu3+ ion was determined by a modified Horrocks’ method.26 The plot of q versus [H2O] (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information) obtained for Eu2 resembles a classical binding curve but curiously plateaus with a q value of ~0.4. The curve obtained for Eu3 is more complex still (Figure S4 in the Supporting Information), possibly because the counterion may become involved in the direct binding to the Eu3+ center, a phenomenon observed in some crystal structures of this chelate.20 Nonetheless, each chelate demonstrates an increase in the hydration state as water is added to the CH3CN solution of the chelate, strongly indicative of substitution of the axial ligand as the solvent is changed.27
LnDOTA-tetraamide chelates that possess tertiary amides demonstrate a greater predisposition for adopting a TSAP coordination geometry than their secondary amide counterparts, even with very large amide substituents. Yet, the monobenzylic analogue of Eu2, which is observed to predominate as the SAP isomer in CD3OD (xSAP>0.99; Figure S5 in the Supporting Information), also exhibits a change in the isomer ratio upon a change in the solvent to CD3CN (xSAP = 0.77), a change that is coupled with an acceleration in the rate of isomer interconversion. Although this change is not as a dramatic as that observed for Eu2, it does raise questions about the assumptions that are made regarding isomeric ratios when such systems are to be applied in vivo. In particular, if tertiary amide systems come to be viewed as a solution to offsetting the cationic nature of DOTA-tetraamide chelates, then the question of how local environmental factors affect structural isomerism in these chelates will become critical. Although the solvent for all in vivo applications is aqueous, it is not homogeneous throughout extracellular space. Compartmentalization of water within tissue leads to differences in the constituents of the solvent throughout tissue. Some components, such as phosphate, phospholipids, and phosphorylated metabolites, may be capable of substituting the axial ligand of tertiary LnDOTA-tetraamide chelates, which it seems plays some role in influencing the isomer distribution. They may also affect the very nature of the water itself, perturbing its inter- and intramolecular interactions and ultimately its interactions with these chelates. If either of these alter the proportion of SAP isomer present or the hydration state of the chelate, it would concomitantly affect the CEST contrast observed in an imaging experiment. This may be an Achilles heel or an advantage that can be exploited to gain additional information, but in either case, it is necessary to understand these effects thoroughly before these systems can be applied in vivo.
Supplementary Material
Supp Info
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge grant support from the National Institutes of Health (Grant EB-11687 to M.W.; Grants RR-02584 and CA-115531 to A.D.S.), the Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnology Institute, the Oregon Opportunity partnership for advancing biomedical research, the M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust, and the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant AT-584).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and additional NMR and luminescence data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
1. Woods M, Woessner DE, Sherry AD. Chem Soc Rev. 2006;35:500–511. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Sherry AD, Woods M. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008;10:391–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Caravan P, Ellison JJ, McMurry TJ, Lauffer RB. Chem Rev. 1999;99:2293–2352. [PubMed]
4. Aime S, Barge A, Botta M, De Sousa AS, Parker D. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1998;37:2673–2675.
5. Aime S, Barge A, Bruce JI, Botta M, Howard JAK, Moloney JM, Parker D, de Sousa AS, Woods M. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:5762–5771.
6. Woods M, Caravan P, Geraldes CFGC, Greenfield MT, Kiefer GE, Lin M, McMillan K, Prata MIM, Santos AC, Sun X, Wang J, Zhang S, Zhao P, Sherry AD. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:861–870. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Sherry AD, Caravan P, Lenkinski Robert E. J Magn Reson Imag. 2009;30:1240–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Aime S, Barge A, Castelli DD, Fedeli F, Mortillaro A, Nielsen FU, Terreno E. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:639–648. [PubMed]
9. Zhang S, Trokowski R, Sherry AD. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:15288–15289. [PubMed]
10. Trokowski R, Zhang S, Sherry AD. Bioconjug Chem. 2004;15:1431–1440. [PubMed]
11. Trokowski R, Ren JM, Kalman FK, Sherry AD. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2005;44:6920–6923. [PubMed]
12. Dunand FA, Aime S, Merbach AE. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:1506–1512.
13. Zhang S, Wu K, Biewer MC, Sherry AD. Inorg Chem. 2001;40:4284–4290. [PubMed]
14. Woods M, Zhang S, Von Howard E, Sherry AD. Chem—Eur J. 2003;9:4634–4640. [PubMed]
15. Barge A, Botta M, Parker D, Puschmann H. Chem Commun. 2003:1386–1387. [PubMed]
16. Aime S, Botta M, Fasano M, Marques MPM, Geraldes CFGC, Pubanz D, Merbach AE. Inorg Chem. 1997;36:2059–2068. [PubMed]
17. Woods M, Kovacs Z, Kiraly R, Brücher E, Zhang S, Sherry AD. Inorg Chem. 2004;43:2845–2851. [PubMed]
18. Aime S, Botta M, Ermondi G. Inorg Chem. 1992;31:4291–9.
19. Hoeft S, Roth K. Chem Ber. 1993;126:869–873.
20. Wada A, Watanabe M, Yamanoi Y, Nishihara H. Chem Commun. 2008:1671–1673. [PubMed]
21. Natrajan LS, Khoabane NM, Dadds BL, Muryn CA, Pritchard RG, Heath SL, Kenwright AM, Kuprov I, Faulkner S. Inorg Chem. 2010;49:7700–7709. [PubMed]
22. Bleaney B. J Magn Reson. 1972;8:91–100.
23. Dickins RS, Parker D, Bruce JI, Tozer DJ. Dalton Trans. 2003:1264–1271.
24. Borel A, Bean JF, Clarkson RB, Helm L, Moriggi L, Sherry AD, Woods M. Chem— Eur J. 2008;14:2658–2667. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Muller G, Kean SD, Parker D, Riehl JP. J Phys Chem A. 2002;106:12349–12355.
26. Beeby A, Clarkson IM, Dickins RS, Faulkner S, Parker D, Royle L, de Sousa AS, Williams JAG, Woods M. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 1999;2:493–504.
27. Batsanov AS, Beeby A, Bruce JI, Howard JAK, Kenwright AM, Parker D. Chem Commun. 1999:1011–1012.