PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3033232
NIHMSID: NIHMS237276

Identification of an important immunological difference between virulent varicella-zoster virus and its avirulent vaccine: viral disruption of dendritic cell instruction

Abstract

Virulent Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) can spread in immunocompetent humans, resulting in symptoms mostly of the skin. In contrast, vaccine Oka (V-Oka), the attenuated VZV vaccine strain, only rarely causes clinical reactions. The mechanisms underlying these pathogenetic differences are unclear. In this study, we comparatively analyzed the ability of virulent VZV and V-Oka to modulate instruction of dendritic cells (DCs) by innate signals. DCs isolated from normal human skin were susceptible to infection with both VZV and V-Oka. Moreover, inflammatory DCs, which play a crucial role in stimulation of T helper type 1 (Th1) immune responses, accumulated in herpes zoster lesions. Infection of inflammatory DCs generated in vitro with either virulent VZV or V-Oka resulted in upregulation of CD1c. Upon coculture with CD1c-restricted innate cells, DCs developed a mature phenotype whether infected with virulent VZV or V-Oka. Intriguingly, a striking difference was detected on the functional level. The release of IFN-γ and IL-12, the signature cytokines of Th1 responses, was enhanced by V-Oka but blocked by virulent VZV. V-Oka and virulent VZV efficiently synergized with CD40L, eliminating the possibility that CD40 signaling was a target of VZV-associated immune evasion. Instead, virulent VZV selectively interfered with signaling through TLR2, which is known to sense VZV. Thus, virulent VZV subverts Th1-promoting instruction of human DCs by blocking TLR2-mediated innate signals that prime IL-12 production by DCs. Taken together, our results demonstrate a novel immune evasion mechanism of virulent VZV that has been lost during the attenuation process leading to the VZV vaccine strain.

Introduction

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV), a member of the human herpesvirus family, infects the majority of the human population. Similar to most other members of the human herpesvirus family, VZV has a narrow host range and does not infect mice or cells of murine origin (1). In humans VZV is transmitted by aerosols and initially infects the upper respiratory tract. During the incubation period, VZV spreads to regional lymph nodes to infect T cells that subsequently transport virions to cutaneous sites (2). There, it efficiently replicates in epithelial cells and fibroblasts causing the typical varicella rash. After primary infection, VZV establishes latency within sensory ganglia. From there, it can reactivate to cause herpes zoster many years later. This disease is characterized by papulovesicular skin lesions, mostly restricted to a single dermatome, and is frequently followed by severe pain. Cellular and humoral immune responses are essential for the control of VZV replication (3). VZV is the first human herpesvirus for which a live attenuated vaccine (Vaccine Oka [V-Oka]) has been generated and approved (4). It is used successfully to immunize millions of children annually in the United States, Europe, and Japan and is now considered a prophylactic option in older individuals to prevent herpes zoster (5). Despite its unquestionable medical importance, the immunological difference between the vaccine and wild type virulent VZV has not yet been defined.

Virulent VZV efficiently spreads in human skin whereas avirulent V-Oka only rarely causes clinical reactions. Thus, similar to other members of the human herpesvirus family virulent VZV has evolved intricate immune evasion strategies (6). These capabilities have been lost during the attenuation process generating the avirulent VZV vaccine. It should be possible to define virulence-associated evasion mechanisms by comparatively studying the capacity of virulent and avirulent VZV to subvert immune reactions. Dendritic cells (DCs) represent a prime target for immunevasive viruses as they couple innate to adaptive immunity to initiate efficient antiviral T cell responses. In the steady state two major DC subsets can be found in the skin (7): epidermal Langerhans cells (LCs) and dermal DCs. They form a network of sentinels that sense invading pathogens. Intriguingly, under inflammatory conditions another DC subset derived from immigrating monocytes accumulates. These inflammatory DCs replace steady state DCs which disappear due to migration to the lymph nodes or apoptosis (8,9). Virulent VZV is known to infect monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) generated in vitro (1012). However, no functional defect of immature MDDCs after VZV infection has been defined so far (10,11).

Powerful T helper 1 (Th1)-like adaptive immune responses are essential to achieve virus control. To promote Th1 responses DCs must provide in essence three signals: “signal 1” is delivered by antigen presentation through specialized surface molecules; “signal 2” is mediated by costimulatory molecules on the surface such as CD40, CD80, and CD86; and “signal 3” is delivered by release of IL-12. Immature DCs receive from different sources a combination of maturation stimuli which they integrate and translate into different qualities of adaptive T cell responses. Innate lymphocytes, which are already active before the onset of adaptive T cell responses, are important to assist DC maturation. For example CD1c-restricted γδ T cells can drive DC differentiation toward a Th1-polarizing program (13). This bidirectional interaction between innate lymphocytes and DCs, called DC instruction, is mediated by cytokines such as IFN-γ and by direct cell-to-cell interaction through ligands of the TNF family, most notably CD40L (14,15). Importantly, optimal IL-12 production, the signature cytokine of Th1- responses, requires conditioning of DCs by pathogen-associated danger signals that synergistically act through multiple pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) (1619). In order to understand viral pathogenesis and develop effective viral vaccines, it is of outmost importance to unravel the intricate interactions between DCs, innate lymphocytes, and pathogen-associated danger signals.

Here, we analyze modulation of DC instruction by the VZV vaccine as compared to virulent VZV clinical isolates. We show that the VZV vaccine primes human MDDCs for IL-12 production. In contrast, virulent VZV disrupts the programming of MDDCs toward a Th1-polarizing function. As an underlying mechanism we could indentify a block in PRR signaling after infection of MDDCs with virulent VZV, a fundamental immunological difference between the vaccine and clinical isolates. In conclusion, we define a novel virulence-associated immune evasion strategy that is important for understanding VZV-associated pathogenesis and has to be considered in future attempts to develop novel vaccines.

Materials and Methods

Human samples

Skin punch biopsies (4 mm) were taken from control subjects undergoing breast reduction and from herpes zoster patients (vesicular stage, n=2). Patients with herpes zoster were immunocompetent (age 62 ± 10.5 years). Skin biopsies were embedded in tissue freezing medium (Jung), and cryo-frozen. 5 μm sections were fixed for 10 min in acetone (−20°C), air-dried overnight and stored at −80°C. Written informed consent for skin punch biopsies was obtained in accordance with the ethical approval EA1/169/06 of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Isolation and VZV infection of epidermal LCs and dermal DCs

Human skin was obtained from healthy volunteers undergoing plastic surgery and prepared as recently described (20). Epidermal sheets were detached from the dermis after overnight incubation with dispase I (2 U/ml, Roche Diagnostics) at 4°C. After incubation with trypsin solution containing 0.25% trypsin in PBS with 5 mM Mg2+ and 10 μg/ml DNase (Roche Diagnostics) for 15 min at 37°C, LCs were positively selected from single-cell suspensions using MACS technique and human CD1c (BDCA-1)+ Dendritic Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec). The dermal pulp was incubated for 1.5 h at 37°C in PBS solution containing 10% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin (10.000 U/ml), amphotericin B (2.5 μg/ml), 5 mM MgSO4, 12 mg collagenase (CellSystem) and 6.5 g hyaluronidase type I S (Sigma Aldrich). The filtered suspension was used to isolate dermal DCs with the human CD1c (BDCA-1)+ Dendritic Cell Isolation Kit. LCs and dermal DCs were centrifuged at 160 × g for 45 min at room temperature on mock- or VZV-infected fibroblast monolayers with a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml in media containing rhTGF-β (10 ng/ml), rhGM-CSF (500 IU/ml) and rhIL-4 (200 IU/ml).

Viruses

VZV was propagated on human embryonic lung fibroblasts (HELFs). VZV clinical isolates designated JoSt (genotype E1), M1_935/05 (genotype M1), E2_769/05 (genotype E2), and E1_667/05 (genotype E1) were isolated from varicella patients. All VZV strains used in this report were analyzed and genotyped by A. Sauerbrei as previously reported (21). The vaccine strain V-Oka was grown from the live attenuated vaccine Varilrix® (GlaxoSmithKline). The titer of VZV stocks (VZV-infected cells) were determined by calculation of the TCID50 by the Reed-Muench formula. CD40L-expressing fibroblasts were kindly provided by R.A. Kroczek (Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany).

Generation and VZV infection of MDDCs

Buffy coats were obtained from the Deutsche Rote Kreuz (Dresden, Germany). Monocytes were isolated through negative selection by the MACS technique (Miltenyi Biotec) and differentiated within 3 days into immature MDDCs by culture with rhGM-CSF (500 IU/ml) and rhIL-4 (200 IU/ml) (Immunotools) as described previously (22). For VZV infection, immature DCs were centrifuged at 150 × g for 45 min at room temperature on a VZV-infected fibroblast monolayer. After 24 h, DCs were removed and assays were performed 2 days after VZV infection. Mock DCs were set up as described above using uninfected fibroblasts.

Antibodies and reagents

Anti-CD1a (HI149) was purchased from Immunotools; anti-CD1b (4.A7.6) and anti-CD1c (L161) were obtained from Immunotech; anti-CD40 (5C3), anti-CD83 (HB15e), anti-CD86 (IT2.2), anti-TCR-γ/δ-1 (11F2), anti-IgG1 (MOPC-21), and anti-IgG2b (MPC-11) were purchased from BD Pharmingen; anti-gE (MAB8612) was obtained from Chemicon. As secondary antibodies, Alexa Fluor® 488-labeled anti-IgG2b and Alexa Fluor® 568-labeled anti-IgG1 from Molecular Probes were used; FITC-, R-phycoerythrin-, allophycocyanin-, and Cy5-labeled isotype-specific antibodies from Jackson ImmunoResearch were used. For neutralization assays, mouse IgG1 (MOPC-21) and mouse anti-CD1c (L161) were added at 20 μg/ml and polyclonal anti-IL-12 (R&D Systems) at 5 μg/ml. Stimulation with LPS was performed at 1 μg/ml and with PHA at 100 ng/ml. Apoptotic death was visualized by using FITC-labeled AnnexinV and propidium iodide (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

T cell assays

The well characterized CD1c-restricted γδ T cell clone (JR.2.28) was cultured by periodic stimulation with PHA-P in the presence of irradiated EBV-transformed B cells and PBMCs as described (23). For cytokine secretion, mock or VZV-infected immature MDDCs were cocultured for 48 h with γδ T cells at an E-T ratio of 1:1 (1 × 105 cells/well). Supernatants were collected and stored at −20°C.

Measurement of cytokine production

Cytokine concentration of supernatants was measured by ELISA. ELISA Kits for human IL-12p70 (eBioscience) and IFN-γ (Immunotools) were used.

Immunohistochemistry

Skin sections (5 μm) were blocked with 5% goat serum (host species of the secondary antibody) for 1 h at room temperature in a humified chamber and then incubated with the specific primary antibodies for 1 h at 37°C. Specific antigen was detected with Alexa Fluor® 488-labeled anti-IgG2b and Alexa Fluor® 568-labeled anti-IgG1 as secondary antibodies (1:400) by incubating for 45 min at room temperature. Nuclei were visualized with the DNA-intercalating dye DAPI (1:20.000). Stained slides were analyzed using a BX60F-3 microscope with Cell D software (Olympus).

Flow cytometry

Cells were washed once in ice-cold FACS-wash solution (PBS with 1% FCS and 0.02% sodium azide) and incubated in ice-cold FACS-block solution (PBS with 10% FCS and 0.2% sodium azide) with primary antibodies at 4°C for 1 h. Cells were washed in ice-cold FACS-wash solution and stained with secondary antibodies for 45 min at 4°C and finally fixed with 0.4% formaldehyde. For detection of apoptotic death cells were washed in apoptosis buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.14 M NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 5% FCS, 0.02% sodium azide) and stained for 20 min at 4°C with AnnexinV. Propidium iodide was shortly added before measuring. A FACSCalibur (BD Bioscience) was used for flow cytometry and data were analyzed with CellQuest Pro (BD Bioscience) as described recently (22).

Statistical analysis

The programs SPSS and Graphpad Prism were used to perform statistics. The Wilcoxon test was used to determine the significance of differences between groups. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant (two-tailed). The actual P values are indicated in the Box-Whisker-Plots.

Results

Virulent VZV and avirulent V-Oka infect skin DC subsets with similar efficiency

First we assessed whether DC subsets found in human skin, the major replication site for VZV, show differential susceptibility to infection with virulent VZV and the avirulent VZV vaccine strain, respectively. For this purpose LCs and dermal DCs were isolated from normal human skin. Surface staining for myeloid marker CD11c and langerin (LCs, Fig. 1A) or CD11c and CD1c (dermal DCs, Fig. 1C) confirmed the purity of the preparations. Freshly isolated LCs and dermal DCs were infected with VZV and surface expression of viral glycoprotein E (gE) was determined. After mock-infection LCs and dermal DCs did not express gE. In contrast 14% and 20%, respectively, of VZV-infected LCs (Fig. 1B) and 12% and 17%, respectively, of dermal DCs (Fig. 1D) strongly expressed gE after VZV infection. No differences in the efficiency of infection could be observed between the avirulent vaccine strain, VOka, and JoSt, a virulent VZV strain. Neither LCs nor dermal DCs upregulated costimulatory molecules after infection (data not shown). Moreover, in vitro generated MDDCs, which model DCs accumulating under inflammatory conditions, were susceptible to VZV infection as previously described (10). V-Oka and JoSt induced similar DC clustering (Fig. 1E) and infected immature MDDCs with the same efficiency (Fig. 1F). The majority of cells (73%) expressed viral gE at low density whereas high amounts of this molecule were found on a minor population (18% and 21%, respectively). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that virulent VZV and V-Oka do not differ regarding the capacity to infect skin DC subsets that are found during steady state or under inflammatory conditions.

FIGURE 1
VZV infection of DC subsets isolated from normal human skin. LCs and dermal DCs were freshly isolated from the epidermis and dermis, respectively, by magnetic bead separation. (A) LCs were stained for langerin and CD11c (left dot plot shows isotype control). ...

Inflammatory DCs accumulate in herpes zoster lesions

Inflammatory DCs play an important role in the development of Th1-polarized T cells that produce IFN-γ and protect against viruses (24). Therefore, we determined whether inflammatory DCs occur during VZV-induced inflammation. For this purpose we studied skin sections from papulovesicular lesions of herpes zoster patients. Staining with DAPI (Fig. 2A) or with Papanicolaou’s solution and eosin (data not shown) revealed a strong cellular infiltration. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we localized myeloid CD11c-expressing DCs and assessed their CD1 expression while visualizing VZV infection by staining for viral gE. CD11c-positive DCs strongly infiltrated VZV-infected skin lesions (Fig. 2B). In contrast, CD1a-positive LCs disappeared from herpes zoster lesions and were found only in the epidermis of the control skin (Fig. 2C). The infiltrating DCs also expressed CD1b (Fig. 2D). DCs with detectable CD1c expression were mainly detected in close proximity to VZV-containing vesicles in inflamed skin tissue but were evenly distributed in the upper dermis of control skin sections (Fig. 2E). Most likely due to the fact that papulovesicular lesions represent an advanced stage of VZV infection in the dermis viral gE was detectable only in a few CD1c-positive cells (Fig. 2E). Altogether, these findings suggest that steady state DCs disappear during viral spread whereas inflammatory DCs strongly accumulate in herpes zoster lesions.

FIGURE 2
Accumulation of inflammatory DCs in herpes zoster lesions. Skin sections of healthy control or herpes zoster patients were stained for DNA with the DNA intercalating dye DAPI (blue) (A), for viral gE (green) (B–E), for CD11c (red) as a myeloid ...

MDDCs infected with virulent VZV fail to stimulate IFN-γ secretion by innate cells

Next we comparatively studied the impact of virulent VZV and V-Oka on phenotype and function of MDDCs in vitro. Since herpesviruses including HSV (25,26) and HCMV (22) can block CD1 expression on MDDCs, we investigated the effect of VZV on group 1 CD1 molecules. Although expression of CD1a (Fig. 3A,B) and CD1b (Fig. 3A) remained unaltered, VZV infection with either strain significantly increased CD1c expression on immature MDDCs (Fig. 3A,B). This was not due to increased abundance of CD1c-encoding transcripts suggesting that the underlying mechanism was operating on the protein level (data not shown). To study the functional impact of VZV-induced CD1c upregulation we used the CD1c-restricted Vδ1+ T cell clone, JR.2.28 (23). Vδ1+ T cells represent the major γδ lymphocyte population in human epithelial tissue. Strikingly, V-Oka-infected immature MDDCs stimulated CD1crestricted Vδ1+ T cells to secrete large amounts of IFN-γ (Fig. 3C,D). In contrast, JoSt-infected immature MDDCs failed to stimulate IFN-γ secretion by CD1c-restricted Vδ1+ T cells. Antibodies to CD1c, but not a respective isotype control, blocked IFN-γ secretion showing that stimulation of γδ T cells required CD1c (Fig. 3E). Altogether, these observations demonstrate a striking functional difference between immature MDDCs infected with the vaccine strain, V-Oka, and those infected with the VZV clinical isolate, JoSt.

FIGURE 3
Stimulation of innate cells by VZV-infected DCs. Immature MDDCs were analyzed 2 d after mock, V-Oka or JoSt infection. (A) Histograms showing surface expression of group 1 CD1 molecules (MFI is indicated). Data are representative of at least six experiments. ...

Both virulent VZV and the avirulent VZV vaccine strain infect γδ T cells

In the previous experiments we could not exclude that virulent VZV targets directly the function of innate lymphocytes. Therefore, we investigated whether VZV is transmitted to CD1c-restricted γδ T cells. For this purpose, the expression of viral gE on γδ T cells after coculture with VZV-infected MDDCs was quantified (Fig. 4A). Avirulent V-Oka and clinical isolate JoSt were transmitted from infected immature MDDCs to γδ T cells with the same low efficiency (6–7%). However, IFN-γ secretion by γδ T cells in the presence of JoSt-infected immature MDDCs could be restored by stimulation with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) demonstrating that virulent VZV does not destroy the functional integrity of γδ T cells (Fig. 4B). In conclusion, the block of IFN-γ release by innate lymphocytes after stimulation with JoSt-infected immature MDDCs was due to a virus-induced defect in MDDCs.

FIGURE 4
Viral transmission from VZV-infected DCs to γδ T cells. CD1c-restricted γδ T cells were cocultured with immature MDDCs 2 d after mock, V-Oka or JoSt infection. (A) The T cell population was gated according the FSC/SSC profile ...

Interference of virulent VZV with DC function is independent of its genotype

We next tested whether the failure of JoSt-infected immature DCs to activate CD1c-restricted innate cells is a general characteristic of virulent VZV strains. To this end, we studied the currently circulating European VZV strains that are grouped into the main genotypes M1, E1, and E2 (21). According to phylogenetic analysis, the isolate M1_935/05 belonged to genotype M1, the isolate E2_769/05 belonged to genotype E2, and the isolates E1_667/05 and JoSt clustered within genotype E1 (Fig. 5A). These VZV strains grew equally well in human embryonic lung fibroblasts (data not shown). Intriguingly, all VZV clinical isolates, regardless of their genotype, strongly blocked the capacity of immature MDDCs to activate CD1c-restricted γδ T cells (Fig. 5B). These functional differences could have been due to differential VZV-induced apoptosis of immature MDDCs. To exclude this possibility, VZV-infected immature MDDCs were stained with FITC-AnnexinV and propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 5C). Mock-infected immature MDDCs contained less than 3% AnnexinV single-positive (apoptotic) cells and less than 1% double-positive (necrotic) cells. By contrast, VZV induced apoptosis in 18–26% of immature MDDCs, regardless whether they were infected with the vaccine or VZV clinical isolates. In all cases, the percentage of necrotic cells was less than 5%. Moreover, there was no difference between between V-Oka and virulent VZV regarding the infection rate as determined by viral gE expression on MDDCs (Fig. 5D). Thus, the functional difference between MDDCs infected with V-Oka and MDDCs infected with clinical isolates was not due to different survival of infected DCs or different infection rates. In conclusion, virulent VZV irrespective of its genotype and geographical origin interferes with the capacity of immature DCs to stimulate IFN-γ secretion by CD1c-restricted γδ T cells.

FIGURE 5
Influence of VZV genotype on DC function and DC apoptosis. (A) Phylogenetic tree of virulent VZV strains circulating in Europe (M1_935/05, E2_769/05, E1_667/05 and JoSt) with respect to the reference strains V-Oka, CA123, VZV11 and Dumas (in italics). ...

DCs infected with virulent VZV are resistant to Th1-promoting instruction

Innate lymphocytes such as CD1c-restricted γδ T cells confer on immature MDDCs the capacity to efficiently prime Th1 cells, a process called DC instruction (13,15,27). We investigated whether VZV-infected immature MDDCs were still susceptible to instruction by CD1c-restricted γδ T cells. For this purpose, expression of CD83 (Fig. 6A) and CD86 (Fig. 6B) on VZV-infected immature MDDCs was determined in the absence or presence of γδ T cells. As a control immature MDDCs were treated with LPS. VZV-infected immature MDDCs in the absence of γδ T cells did not show a mature phenotype. Surprisingly immature MDDCs, whether infected with the vaccine V-Oka or the clinical isolate JoSt, phenotypically matured after adding γδ T cells or LPS. We next studied the ability of CD1c-restricted γδ T cells to induce VZV-infected immature MDDCs to secrete IL-12, a key cytokine for stimulation of Th1 cell responses (Fig. 6C). In the absence of γδ T cells, neither mock-infected nor VZV-infected immature MDDCs secreted bioactive IL-12p70. Strikingly, in the presence of γδ T cells, immature MDDCs infected with vaccine strain V-Oka secreted increased amounts of IL-12p70 into the supernatant compared to mock-infected MDDCs. By contrast, immature MDDCs infected with VZV clinical isolates and cocultured with γδ T cells failed to produce significant amounts of IL-12p70. Similar to the European VZV strains, a japanese VZV clinical isolate belonging to the genotype J like V-Oka also blocked induction of IL-12 release in cocultures of MDDCs with γδ T cells (data not shown). To assess the relevance of IL-12 by MDDCs on IFN-γ secretion by γδ T cells, we added neutralizing IL-12 antibodies to the cultures. The addition of neutralizing IL-12 antibodies blocked more than 50% of IFN-γ secretion by γδ T cells when cultured with V-Oka-infected immature MDDCs (Fig. 6D). These results indicate that both the VZV vaccine and virulent VZV allow phenotypic maturation of immature MDDCs upon crosstalk with innate lymphocytes. Strikingly, however, only the VZV vaccine promotes functional instruction of MDDCs leading to release of Th1-polarizing IL-12.

FIGURE 6
Phenotype and function of VZV-infected DCs after instruction by innate cells. VZV-infected immature MDDCs were left untreated as a control, cocultured with γδ T cells, or stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml). After 24 h cell surface expression ...

Both virulent VZV and the VZV vaccine synergize with stimulation through CD40

Next we analyzed whether disruption of DC instruction by virulent VZV was due to a viral block in CD40 signaling which is crucial for inducing IL-12 secretion by MDDCs (28). After infection with the clinical isolate JoSt, upregulation of CD40 on the surface of immature MDDCs was impaired compared to cells infected with the VZV vaccine (Fig. 7A, B). Similarly, less CD40-encoding transcripts were found in JoSt-infected compared to V-Oka-infected immature MDDCs (data not shown). However, after stimulation with CD40L-expressing fibroblasts both JoSt-infected and V-Oka-infected immature MDDCs secreted more IL-12p70 than mock-infected immature MDDCs (Fig. 7C). This increased IL-12 release was mirrored by enhanced CD40L-mediated activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in VZV-infected as compared to mock-infected DCs (data not shown). Next, γδ T cells were added to the cultures and IFN-γ secretion measured (Fig. 7D). Intriguingly, the ability of JoSt-infected immature DCs to stimulate IFN-γ secretion by γδ T cells was fully rescued in the presence of CD40L-expressing fibroblasts. Collectively, these data demonstrate that despite blocking CD40 upregulation on infected DCs virulent VZV amplifies CD40 signaling similar to the VZV vaccine.

FIGURE 7
IL-12 production by VZV-infected DCs after CD40 triggering. (A) Surface expression of CD40 on VZV-infected immature MDDCs 2 d after infection (MFI is indicated). Data are representative of 11 experiments. (B) Box-and-Whisker- Plot of CD40 expression (MFI) ...

Virulent VZV selectively inhibits TLR2 signaling

Next we investigated DC priming by signaling through Toll-like receptors (TLRs), a prerequisite of DC instruction (13,29). In the absence of innate cells signaling through multiple PRRs can synergize to efficiently prime IL-12 secretion by DCs (1719). Therefore, we tested whether VZV can cooperate with signaling through TLR2 and TLR3 which are involved in detection of HSV and VZV, the human alphaherpesviruses (3033). They are located on the cell surface (TLR2) and endosomes (TLR3), respectively. TLR2 recognizes viral glycoproteins in the viral envelope whereas TLR3 detects double-stranded RNA. VZV-infected immature DCs were challenged with lipoteichoic acid (LTA), a TLR2 agonist, or poly(I:C), a TLR3 agonist. As shown in Fig. 8A uninfected or mock-infected DCs treated with LTA did not secrete IL12p70. Intriguingly, DCs infected with V-Oka or HSV released large amounts of IL-12p70 after challenge with LTA. In sharp contrast, DCs infected with JoSt, the virulent VZV strain, hardly secreted any IL-12 in response to LTA. Strikingly, efficient priming of DCs required viral replication as LTA did not synergize with UV-inactivated virus to induce the release of IL-12. Similar to LTA the TLR3 agonist poly(I:C) could not induce uninfected or mock-infected DCs to secrete substantial amounts of IL-12 (Fig. 8B). However, V-Oka and to a lesser extent virulent VZV but not HSV cooperated with poly(I:C) to trigger IL-12 secretion. DCs infected with UV-inactivated virus did not respond to poly(I:C) as observed for LTA. Taken together, these data demonstrate that replicating VZV can prime DCs for IL-12 release. However, there was a fundamental difference between V-Oka and virulent VZV. The former synergized with both TLR2 and TLR3 whereas the latter selectively blocked signaling through TLR2, which is known to detect virulent VZV.

FIGURE 8
TLR signaling in VZV-infected DCs. Immature MDDCs were left untreated (co) or either mock-, V-Oka-, or JoSt- infected (black columns) or stimulated with UV-inactivated mock-, V-Oka-, or JoSt-infected cells (white columns) for 2 d. In addition immature ...

Discussion

In this study we demonstrate the immunological difference between V-Oka, the vaccine strain, and VZV clinical isolates: instruction of inflammatory DCs toward a Th1-polarizing program is promoted by V-Oka but disrupted by virulent VZV.

We could show that different DC subsets are susceptible to VZV infection. LCs and dermal DCs isolated from normal human skin could be infected by VZV. Other investigators have recently demonstrated that both plasmacytoid DCs isolated from human blood and LCs generated from MUTZ-3 cells are permissive to VZV infection (34). Additionally, immature DCs generated in vitro from monocytes were susceptible to VZV infection as previously reported (10,11). The majority of these MDDCs expressed viral gE at low levels. Only 10–20% showed strong surface expression of this molecule. The distinct peaks can be explained by the highly cell-associated nature of VZV. For VZV infection, MDDCs have to be centrifuged on a VZV-infected fibroblast monolayer. During the first round of virus transmission the virus infects only a few MDDCs due to the close cell-to-cell contact required. In this induction phase innate responses are weak and the virus multiplies efficiently resulting in strong viral gE surface expression. In contrast, most MDDCs are probably infected later when the innate defense is already fully established in the cell culture resulting in less efficient viral replication and low viral gE surface expression. Importantly, however, there was no difference with regard to the infection efficiency between the VZV vaccine and virulent VZV.

Skin biopsies from zoster lesions revealed that LCs disappear in the vicinity of virus-containing vesicles confirming other reports (34,35). This could have been due to virus-induced apoptosis. Alternatively, VZV-infected LCs could have emigrated to the regional lymph nodes to transfer VZV antigen to resident DCs. In contrast, inflammatory DCs strongly infiltrated VZV-infected skin. Similar observations have been made for lepromatous skin lesions in humans (8) and in an experimental mouse model of leishmanial infection in the dermis (9). It is likely that the majority of VZV-infected inflammatory DCs have already undergone apoptosis or migrated to the lymph nodes at the time point when skin punch biopsies were taken. This could explain the scarcity of CD1c-positive cells expressing viral gE in papulovesicular lesions, a relatively late stage of VZV infection in the dermis. Alternatively, VZV-infected inflammatory DCs might be difficult to detect in skin sections. This assumption is supported by the fact that most MDDCs infected in vitro with VZV show only low gE expression in FACS analysis.

The infiltrating DCs are derived from monocytes that are recruited to the site of inflammation, and resemble dermal DCs found in normal skin. After maturation they migrate to the regional lymph nodes to induce a protective Th1 cell responses (36). Recently, it has been demonstrated in the mouse model that inflammatory DCs are required to induce a Th1-polarized response that protects against viruses (24). For this reason we modelled inflammatory DCs in vitro and analyzed in detail whether VZV can interfere with their ability to couple innate to adaptive immune responses.

In accordance with a previous report no changes in CD1a and CD86 expression after infection of immature DCs with JoSt, a VZV clinical isolate, were detected (10). Surprisingly, both vaccine and VZV clinical isolates significantly enhanced CD1c expression on immature DCs. Although CD1c can present synthetic lipopeptides that mimic N-terminally acylated peptides found in cellular and viral proteins (37), the self ligand and possible viral ligands recognized by CD1c-restricted γδ T cells are still unknown (23). Strikingly, V-Oka-infected but not immature DCs infected with VZV clinical isolates could efficiently stimulate IFN-γ release by CD1c-restricted γδ T cells. In addition, VZV has been demonstrated to interfere with IFN-γ signal transduction via the Jak/Stat pathway (38). Such mechanisms aiming at IFN-γ release or IFN-γ signal transduction represent an important viral defense strategy for several reasons. Firstly, IFN-γ is a key cytokine polarizing the adaptive immune response towards Th1 lymphocytes, which provide help for cytotoxic T cells and can themselves lyse virus-infected cells. Secondly, rapid supply of IFN-γ in an early phase of VZV infection could prevent viral spread and skin lesions through noncytolytic virus clearance (39).

Viral pathogens have developed multiple mechanisms that eliminate DCs (40). In our study VZV clinical isolates and the VZV vaccine induced apoptosis to a similar extent: From 18 to 26% of DCs underwent programmed cell death after infection. Thus, the lack of IFN-γ release during cross-talk of DCs infected with virulent VZV with innate cells was not due enhanced apoptosis induction. Apoptotic debris from VZV-infected immature DCs could be phagocytosed by uninfected bystander DCs that subsequently mature, migrate to the regional lymph nodes, and cross-present VZV-derived peptides to conventional αβ T lymphocytes. Such a mechanism could explain why high frequencies of VZV-specific αβ T cells are observed in immunocompetent individuals after natural VZV infection (41) despite multiple and highly efficient viral immune evasion mechanisms. On the other hand it is also possible that viruses such as VZV trigger DC apoptosis to blunt the antiviral immune response as apoptotic blebs may constitute a tolerogenic signal (42).

VZV is known to possess T-cell tropism and can be transferred from infected DCs to αβ T cells (38). Infected αβ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood transport VZV to the skin during the cell-associated viremia of primary infection (2). We found that infected DCs transmit VZV to CD1c-restricted. γδ T cells suggesting that these intraepithelial lymphocytes contribute to viral dissemination in the skin during reactivation of VZV from sensory ganglia. However, infection with virulent VZV did not silence CD1c-restricted. γδ T cells suggesting that the pathogen disrupts DC instruction at the side of DCs.

Upon interaction with innate lymphocytes, DCs upregulate surface expression of CD83 and CD86, secrete IL-12, and efficiently induce Th1-like adaptive immune responses (13,15,28,29,4346). We observed that in the presence of γδ T cells DCs acquired a fully mature phenotype whether infected with the vaccine V-Oka or the clinical isolate JoSt. Consequently, the inability of DCs infected with virulent VZV strains to stimulate IFN-γ secretion by CD1c-restricted γδ T cells was not due to a viral block in upregulation of costimulatory molecules (“signal 2”). However, only the VZV vaccine licensed release of IL-12 (“signal 3”), a potent inducer of IFN-γ secretion from T cells and of Th1 cell differentiation. By contrast, all DCs infected with VZV clinical isolates, regardless of their genotype, were unable to secrete significant amounts of IL-12 upon interaction with CD1c-restricted γδ T cells. Neutralization of IL-12 by antibodies during coculture of V-Oka-infected DCs with CD1c-restricted γδ T cells decreased IFN-γ secretion 60–70%. These results emphasize that DC instruction is a bidirectional process whereby DCs and innate lymphocytes stimulate each other (43,47).

Besides IFN-γ a second signal provided by CD40 engagement is required for triggering IL-12 secretion by DCs (48,49). We observed a moderate although significant increase of CD40 on vaccine strain-infected DCs whereas DCs infected with virulent VZV did not show this effect. However, this difference in CD40 surface expression on infected DCs was functionally irrelevant. In comparison to unstimulated control cells, both JoSt-infected and V-Oka-infected DCs released large amounts of IL-12 after stimulation with CD40L-expressing cells. Remarkably, the CD40L-induced IL-12 secretion by VZV-infected DCs was even higher than the amount of IL-12 measured after stimulation of mock-infected DCs. This result supports the concept that IL-12 release triggered by CD40-CD40L interaction is amplified by pathogen-derived danger signals (19). Additionally, analysis of the CD40 signaling pathway in VZV-infected DCs cocultered with CD40L-expressing cells revealed enhanced phosphorylation of JNK, ERK, and p38 kinases compared to mock-infected DCs (data not shown). In this regard DCs infected with virulent VZV differ from HSV-infected DCs which do not produce IL-12 in response to CD40L-expressing cells (50). Finally, IFN-γ secretion by the cocultured γδ T cells could be fully rescued after stimulating virulent VZV-infected DCs with CD40L-expressing cells. These data clearly show that virulent VZV synergizes with CD40 signaling as efficient as the VZV vaccine and does not target CD40 signaling to interfere with DC instruction.

There was the possibility that virulent VZV subverts priming of DCs for optimal IL-12 production which requires synergistic signaling through multiple PRRs (17,18). Multiple PRRs at different cellular locations are involved in the detection of alphaherpesviruses such as VZV and HSV. Viral glycoproteins within the viral envelope are recognized by TLR2 at the cell surface (3032). In contrast, TLR3, which recognizes double-stranded RNA, is located in endosomes and has been shown to contribute to the innate response against HSV (33). Dual recognition of HSV by different TLRs is crucial to optimize the antiviral response (51). We observed that signaling through TLR2 or TLR3 in uninfected or mock-infected DCs did not induce IL-12 release confirming a previous report (18). In contrast, DCs infected with either VZV vaccine or HSV secreted high amounts of IL-12 after stimulation with LTA, a TLR2 agonist. Intriguingly, LTA-induced IL-12 release was abrogated in DCs infected with virulent VZV. On the other hand, a VZV clinical isolate has been shown to trigger TLR2 on stably transfected HEK293 cells (32). This finding excludes the possibility that TLR2 simply neglects virulent VZV due to polymorphisms that occur in all 9 VZV envelope glycoproteins (52). Currently it is unknown which of these glycoproteins act as a TLR2 ligand. V-Oka and to a lesser extent virulent VZV synergized with poly(I:C), a TLR3 agonist. In contrast, HSV-infected DCs did not support TLR3-signaling. The latter finding is in accordance with a recent report showing that DCs use TLR3-independent pathways to prevent further dissemination of HSV (33). In conclusion, our results suggest that virulent VZV actively interferes with signaling downstream of surface TLR2. It has been shown that vaccinia virus and hepatitis C virus encode proteins that block intracellular TLR signaling components (53,54). Similarly, virulent VZV might encode a TLR antagonist that disrupts intracellular TLR2 signaling.

The molecular mechanisms underlying attenuation of the VZV vaccine are not yet understood. Our results show that virulent VZV disrupts instruction of DCs toward a Th1-polarizing program. During DC instruction by innate cells virulent VZV strongly blocked the release of IL-12 (“signal 3”). As underlying mechanism we could identify a viral block of synergistic signaling through TLR2 which detects an unknown VZV envelope glycoprotein. The capacity of virulent VZV to interfere with DC instruction may be crucial for extensive and, therefore, symptomatic viral replication in the skin after reactivation from cranial and dorsal root ganglia. Moreover, this immune evasion strategy is likely to be relevant for the viral spread from infected mucosa in the respiratory tract to the skin during primary infection. Our findings do not only expand our understanding of VZV-associated pathogenesis but also have practical consequences. Novel vaccination approaches have to verify that the candidate vaccines allow priming of DCs for IL-12 secretion, which is essential for the timely induction of an efficient antiviral immune response that prevents disease.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank T. Kaiser (Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany) for assistance in flow cytometry; U. Noack, M. Bigalke, and M. Alexi for excellent technical support; R.A. Kroczek (Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany) for providing CD40L-expressing fibroblasts; D. Ernst (Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany) for help in performing immunohistochemistry of skin biopsies; and B. Eilers (Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany) for providing reagents.

This study was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB421 and SCHO 592/6-1 to G.S.), from the Universitäre Forschungsförderung of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (to C.G.), and from the National Institutes of Health (AR45504, AI057160 (Midwest Regional Center of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Research), and CA113874 to C.T.M.).

Abbreviations in this paper

DCs
Dendritic cells
MDDCs
monocyte-derived DCs
LC
Langerhans cells
Vδ1+ T cells
gamma delta T cells expressing variable δ1 chain
V-Oka
vaccine Oka
VZV
Varicella-Zoster Virus

Footnotes

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is an author-produced version of a manuscript accepted for publication in The Journal of Immunology (The JI). The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. (AAI), publisher of The JI, holds the copyright to this manuscript. This version of the manuscript has not yet been copyedited or subjected to editorial proofreading by The JI; hence, it may differ from the final version published in The JI (online and in print). AAI (The JI) is not liable for errors or omissions in this author-produced version of the manuscript or in any version derived from it by the U.S. National Institutes of Health or any other third party. The final, citable version of record can be found at www.jimmunol.org.

References

1. Weber O. Novel mouse models for the investigation of experimental drugs with activity against human varicella-zoster virus. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2000;11:283–290. [PubMed]
2. Ku CC, Zerboni L, Ito H, Graham BS, Wallace M, Arvin AM. Varicella-zoster virus transfer to skin by T Cells and modulation of viral replication by epidermal cell interferon-alpha. J Exp Med. 2004;200:917–925. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Gershon AA, Steinberg SP. Cellular and humoral immune responses to varicella-zoster virus in immunocompromised patients during and after varicella-zoster infections. Infect Immun. 1979;25:170–174. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Arvin AM, Gershon AA. Live attenuated varicella vaccine. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996;50:59–100. [PubMed]
5. Oxman MN, Levin MJ, Johnson GR, Schmader KE, Straus SE, Gelb LD, Arbeit RD, Simberkoff MS, Gershon AA, Davis LE, Weinberg A, Boardman KD, Williams HM, Zhang JH, Peduzzi PN, Beisel CE, Morrison VA, Guatelli JC, Brooks PA, Kauffman CA, Pachucki CT, Neuzil KM, Betts RF, Wright PF, Griffin MR, Brunell P, Soto NE, Marques AR, Keay SK, Goodman RP, Cotton DJ, Gnann JW, Jr, Loutit J, Holodniy M, Keitel WA, Crawford GE, Yeh SS, Lobo Z, Toney JF, Greenberg RN, Keller PM, Harbecke R, Hayward AR, Irwin MR, Kyriakides TC, Chan CY, Chan IS, Wang WW, Annunziato PW, Silber JL. A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2271–2284. [PubMed]
6. Abendroth A, Arvin AM. Immune evasion as a pathogenic mechanism of varicella zoster virus. Semin Immunol. 2001;13:27–39. [PubMed]
7. Kupper TS, Fuhlbrigge RC. Immune surveillance in the skin: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:211–222. [PubMed]
8. Krutzik SR, Tan B, Li H, Ochoa MT, Liu PT, Sharfstein SE, Graeber TG, Sieling PA, Liu YJ, Rea TH, Bloom BR, Modlin RL. TLR activation triggers the rapid differentiation of monocytes into macrophages and dendritic cells. Nat Med. 2005;11:653–660. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Leon B, Lopez-Bravo M, Ardavin C. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells formed at the infection site control the induction of protective T helper 1 responses against Leishmania. Immunity. 2007;26:519–531. [PubMed]
10. Abendroth A, Morrow G, Cunningham AL, Slobedman B. Varicella-zoster virus infection of human dendritic cells and transmission to T cells: implications for virus dissemination in the host. J Virol. 2001;75:6183–6192. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Hu H, Cohen JI. Varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 47 (ORF47) protein is critical for virus replication in dendritic cells and for spread to other cells. Virology. 2005;337:304–311. [PubMed]
12. Morrow G, Slobedman B, Cunningham AL, Abendroth A. Varicella-zoster virus productively infects mature dendritic cells and alters their immune function. J Virol. 2003;77:4950–4959. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Leslie DS, Vincent MS, Spada FM, Das H, Sugita M, Morita CT, Brenner MB. CD1-mediated gamma/delta T cell maturation of dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2002;196:1575–1584. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Vieira PL, de Jong EC, Wierenga EA, Kapsenberg ML, Kalinski P. Development of Th1-inducing capacity in myeloid dendritic cells requires environmental instruction. J Immunol. 2000;164:4507–4512. [PubMed]
15. Vincent MS, Leslie DS, Gumperz JE, Xiong X, Grant EP, Brenner MB. CD1-dependent dendritic cell instruction. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:1163–1168. [PubMed]
16. Gautier G, Humbert M, Deauvieau F, Scuiller M, Hiscott J, Bates EE, Trinchieri G, Caux C, Garrone P. A type I interferon autocrine-paracrine loop is involved in Toll-like receptor-induced interleukin-12p70 secretion by dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1435–1446. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Napolitani G, Rinaldi A, Bertoni F, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Selected Toll-like receptor agonist combinations synergistically trigger a T helper type 1-polarizing program in dendritic cells. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:769–776. [PubMed]
18. Roses RE, Xu S, Xu M, Koldovsky U, Koski G, Czerniecki BJ. Differential production of IL-23 and IL-12 by myeloid-derived dendritic cells in response to TLR agonists. J Immunol. 2008;181:5120–5127. [PubMed]
19. Schulz O, Edwards AD, Schito M, Aliberti J, Manickasingham S, Sher A, Reis e Sousa CD40 triggering of heterodimeric IL-12 p70 production by dendritic cells in vivo requires a microbial priming signal. Immunity. 2000;13:453–462. [PubMed]
20. Aliahmadi E, Gramlich R, Grutzkau A, Hitzler M, Kruger M, Baumgrass R, Schreiner M, Wittig B, Wanner R, Peiser M. TLR2-activated human langerhans cells promote Th17 polarization via IL-1beta, TGF-beta and IL-23. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:1221–1230. [PubMed]
21. Sauerbrei A, Zell R, Philipps A, Wutzler P. Genotypes of varicella-zoster virus wild-type strains in Germany. J Med Virol. 2008;80:1123–1130. [PubMed]
22. Raftery MJ, Hitzler M, Winau F, Giese T, Plachter B, Kaufmann SHE, Schönrich G. Inhibition of CD1 antigen presentation by human cytomegalovirus. J Virol. 2008;82:4308–4319. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Spada FM, Grant EP, Peters PJ, Sugita M, Melian A, Leslie DS, Lee HK, van Donselaar E, Hanson DA, Krensky AM, Majdic O, Porcelli SA, Morita CT, Brenner MB. Self-recognition of CD1 by gamma/delta T cells: implications for innate immunity. J Exp Med. 2000;191:937–948. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Nakano H, Lin KL, Yanagita M, Charbonneau C, Cook DN, Kakiuchi T, Gunn MD. Blood-derived inflammatory dendritic cells in lymph nodes stimulate acute T helper type 1 immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:394–402. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Raftery MJ, Winau F, Kaufmann SH, Schaible UE, Schönrich G. CD1 antigen presentation by human dendritic cells as a target for herpes simplex virus immune evasion. J Immunol. 2006;177:6207–6214. [PubMed]
26. Yuan W, Dasgupta A, Cresswell P. Herpes simplex virus evades natural killer T cell recognition by suppressing CD1d recycling. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:835–842. [PubMed]
27. Fujii S, Shimizu K, Hemmi H, Steinman RM. Innate Valpha14(+) natural killer T cells mature dendritic cells, leading to strong adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev. 2007;220:183–198. [PubMed]
28. Fujii S, Liu K, Smith C, Bonito AJ, Steinman RM. The linkage of innate to adaptive immunity via maturing dendritic cells in vivo requires CD40 ligation in addition to antigen presentation and CD80/86 costimulation. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1607–1618. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Brigl M, Bry L, Kent SC, Gumperz JE, Brenner MB. Mechanism of CD1d-restricted natural killer T cell activation during microbial infection. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:1230–1237. [PubMed]
30. Aravalli RN, Hu S, Rowen TN, Palmquist JM, Lokensgard JR. Cutting edge: TLR2-mediated proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production by microglial cells in response to herpes simplex virus. J Immunol. 2005;175:4189–4193. [PubMed]
31. Kurt-Jones EA, Chan M, Zhou S, Wang J, Reed G, Bronson R, Arnold MM, Knipe DM, Finberg RW. Herpes simplex virus 1 interaction with Toll-like receptor 2 contributes to lethal encephalitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:1315–1320. [PubMed]
32. Wang JP, Kurt-Jones EA, Shin OS, Manchak MD, Levin MJ, Finberg RW. Varicella-zoster virus activates inflammatory cytokines in human monocytes and macrophages via Toll-like receptor 2. J Virol. 2005;79:12658–12666. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Zhang SY, Jouanguy E, Ugolini S, Smahi A, Elain G, Romero P, Segal D, Sancho-Shimizu V, Lorenzo L, Puel A, Picard C, Chapgier A, Plancoulaine S, Titeux M, Cognet C, von BH, Ku CL, Casrouge A, Zhang XX, Barreiro L, Leonard J, Hamilton C, Lebon P, Heron B, Vallee L, Quintana-Murci L, Hovnanian A, Rozenberg F, Vivier E, Geissmann F, Tardieu M, Abel L, Casanova JL. TLR3 deficiency in patients with herpes simplex encephalitis. Science. 2007;317:1522–1527. [PubMed]
34. Huch JH, Cunningham AL, Arvin AM, Nasr N, Santegoets SJ, Slobedman E, Slobedman B, Abendroth A. Impact of varicella zoster virus on dendritic cell subsets in human skin during natural infection. J Virol. 2010 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01450-09. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Drijkoningen M, Wolf-Peeters C, Degreef H, Desmet V. Epidermal Langerhans cells, dermal dendritic cells, and keratinocytes in viral lesions of skin and mucous membranes: an immunohistochemical study. Arch Dermatol Res. 1988;280:220–227. [PubMed]
36. Leon B, Ardavin C. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells in innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol Cell Biol. 2008;86:320–324. [PubMed]
37. Van R, I, Young DC, De JA, Vazquez J, Cheng TY, Talekar R, Barral D, Leon L, Brenner MB, Katz JT, Riese R, Ruprecht RM, O’Connor PB, Costello CE, Porcelli SA, Briken V, Moody DB. CD1c bypasses lysosomes to present a lipopeptide antigen with 12 amino acids. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1409–1422. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Abendroth A, Slobedman B, Lee E, Mellins E, Wallace M, Arvin AM. Modulation of major histocompatibility class II protein expression by varicella-zoster virus. J Virol. 2000;74:1900–1907. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Guidotti LG, Chisari FV. Noncytolytic control of viral infections by the innate and adaptive immune response. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:65–91. [PubMed]
40. Hay S, Kannourakis G. A time to kill: viral manipulation of the cell death program. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:1547–1564. [PubMed]
41. Diaz PS, Smith S, Hunter E, Arvin AM. T lymphocyte cytotoxicity with natural varicella-zoster virus infection and after immunization with live attenuated varicella vaccine. J Immunol. 1989;142:636–641. [PubMed]
42. Tournier JN, Quesnel-Hellmann A. Host-pathogen interactions: a biological rendez-vous of the infectious nonself and danger models? PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:341–345. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Gerosa F, Baldani-Guerra B, Nisii C, Marchesini V, Carra G, Trinchieri G. Reciprocal activating interaction between natural killer cells and dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195:327–333. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Hermans IF, Silk JD, Gileadi U, Salio M, Mathew B, Ritter G, Schmidt R, Harris AL, Old L, Cerundolo V. NKT cells enhance CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to soluble antigen in vivo through direct interaction with dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2003;171:5140–5147. [PubMed]
45. Ismaili J, Olislagers V, Poupot R, Fournie JJ, Goldman M. Human gamma delta T cells induce dendritic cell maturation. Clin Immunol. 2002;103:296–302. [PubMed]
46. Mocikat R, Braumuller H, Gumy A, Egeter O, Ziegler H, Reusch U, Bubeck A, Louis J, Mailhammer R, Riethmuller G, Koszinowski U, Rocken M. Natural killer cells activated by MHC class I(low) targets prime dendritic cells to induce protective CD8 T cell responses. Immunity. 2003;19:561–569. [PubMed]
47. Conti L, Casetti R, Cardone M, Varano B, Martino A, Belardelli F, Poccia F, Gessani S. Reciprocal activating interaction between dendritic cells and pamidronate-stimulated gammadelta T cells: role of CD86 and inflammatory cytokines. J Immunol. 2005;174:252–260. [PubMed]
48. Cella M, Scheidegger D, Palmer-Lehmann K, Lane P, Lanzavecchia A, Alber G. Ligation of CD40 on dendritic cells triggers production of high levels of interleukin-12 and enhances T cell stimulatory capacity: T-T help via APC activation. J Exp Med. 1996;184:747–752. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Snijders A, Kalinski P, Hilkens CM, Kapsenberg ML. High-level IL-12 production by human dendritic cells requires two signals. Int Immunol. 1998;10:1593–1598. [PubMed]
50. Salio M, Cella M, Suter M, Lanzavecchia A. Inhibition of dendritic cell maturation by herpes simplex virus. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29:3245–3253. [PubMed]
51. Sato A, Linehan MM, Iwasaki A. Dual recognition of herpes simplex viruses by TLR2 and TLR9 in dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17343–17348. [PubMed]
52. Storlie J, Maresova L, Jackson W, Grose C. Comparative analyses of the 9 glycoprotein genes found in wild-type and vaccine strains of varicella-zoster virus. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(Suppl 2):S49–S53. [PubMed]
53. Li K, Foy E, Ferreon JC, Nakamura M, Ferreon AC, Ikeda M, Ray SC, Gale M, Jr, Lemon SM. Immune evasion by hepatitis C virus NS3/4A protease-mediated cleavage of the Toll-like receptor 3 adaptor protein TRIF. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:2992–2997. [PubMed]
54. Stack J, I, Haga R, Schroder M, Bartlett NW, Maloney G, Reading PC, Fitzgerald KA, Smith GL, Bowie AG. Vaccinia virus protein A46R targets multiple Toll-like-interleukin-1 receptor adaptors and contributes to virulence. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1007–1018. [PMC free article] [PubMed]