A wealth of data now suggest that most HIV controllers maintain control of viral replication at least in part through potent HIV-specific T cell responses
[6],
[7],
[8],
[9],
[10],
[11],
[12],
[13],
[14],
[20],
[22], observations that have spurred the development of vaccines that elicit T cell responses against HIV. However, the mechanisms responsible for a strong HIV-specific T cell response in HIV controllers may not be without important consequences for the immune system. As our group recently reported, most HIV controllers have abnormally high levels of immune activation, which is associated with significant CD4+ T cell depletion and even AIDS despite continued control of virus replication
[34]. In the current study, we have expanded upon this prior work and assessed potential mechanisms to explain this paradox. First, despite abnormally high T cell activation levels, HIV controllers have significantly lower Treg frequencies than HIV-uninfected individuals. Second, we observed a strikingly strong relationship between adaptive HIV-specific CD4+ T cell and antibody responses and generalized T cell activation in HIV controllers. Third, we observed unusually high CMV-specific CD4+ T cell responses in HIV controllers, suggesting that their ability to mount strong T cell responses to chronic viral infections may not be specific for HIV. Collectively, these observations suggest that a low Treg response may allow some HIV controllers to maintain viral control with a strong cytotoxic HIV-specific T cell response, but might also contribute to the negative inflammatory consequences of generalized T cell activation in this setting ().
Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain why HIV controllers maintain low to undetectable levels of viral replication in the absence of therapy. While it is possible that some HIV controllers may simply be infected with defective viruses
[39], most harbor replication competent viruses that lack gross deletions or lethal mutations
[40],
[41]. Several lines of evidence suggest an important role of HIV-specific T cells in the control of viral replication. For example, most HIV controllers maintain unusually high frequencies of HIV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells
[6],
[7], , as well as HIV-specific CD8+ T cells with greater proliferative and cytotoxic potential
[8],
[12],
[42]. While strong HIV-specific T cell responses could conceivably be a consequence of poor viral fitness
[43],
[44], HIV controllers are highly enriched for protective class I HLA alleles (i.e., B5701) and polymorphisms associated with HLA C expression
[15],
[16],
[17],
[18], suggesting that CD8+ T cell responses may play an important role in the control of HIV replication. Some HIV controllers also have high frequencies of CD4+ T cells with cytotoxic activity
[45],
[46]. However, many HIV controllers lack a protective HLA type, have very low frequencies of HIV-specific T cells, or maintain control of viral replication even after documented escape from HLA-restricted epitopes
[14],
[20],
[21],
[22]. In these individuals, non-T cell-mediated mechanisms of control are likely. For example, HIV controllers are highly enriched for HLA and KIR allotypes associated with enhanced natural killer cell responses
[47],
[48]. Other immunologic mechanisms and host restriction factors that are yet to be fully characterized are also likely to play a role
[16],
[49].
It is important to acknowledge this heterogeneity in the mechanisms of viral control in HIV controllers as some mechanisms are likely to be associated with more negative inflammatory consequences than others. While other cohorts have not observed increased T cell activation levels in HIV controllers
[50],
[51], these studies either included individuals with nef-deleted viruses or only included HIV controllers maintaining normal CD4+ T cell counts. When selecting HIV controllers solely on the basis of their ability to control viral replication, it is clear that some controllers eventually progress to significant levels of CD4+ T cell depletion
[5],
[52],
[53], and these individuals have the highest T cell activation levels
[34]. In the current study, we also observed that HIV controllers with the highest HIV-specific CD4+ T cell frequencies and antibody levels had the highest levels of generalized T cell activation and the greatest degree of CD4+ T cell depletion. Thus, the HIV-specific immune response and generalized T cell activation are tightly linked in HIV controllers and these relationships appear to be stronger than those observed in untreated HIV-infected individuals with high levels of viral replication
[54],
[55]. While we cannot exclude the possibility that higher adaptive immune responses are simply a consequence of greater degrees of low-level viral replication - particularly in lymphoid tissues, differences between HIV controllers in the degree of adaptive immune responses and T cell activation may well reflect host differences in the immune response elicited by any given level of virus replication. The extent of microbial translocation may be one factor modulating the response to low-level HIV replication. As we reported previously, most HIV controllers have abnormally high plasma lipopolysaccharide levels
[34], which might drive generalized immune activation, but also serve as an adjuvant for HIV-specific T cell responses, particularly in gut-associated lymphoid tissue where the majority of HIV replication is thought to occur.
Alternatively, HIV controllers may be enriched for host genetic factors associated with strong innate and/or weak Treg responses to viral infection. Indeed, we found that HIV controllers had significantly lower frequencies of CD25+CD127
dim CD4+ Tregs in peripheral blood than HIV-uninfected individuals despite much higher levels of T cell activation. While we cannot exclude the possibility that HIV controllers preferentially retain Tregs in lymphoid tissues, a recent study also found low frequencies of Tregs in tissues of HIV controllers
[56]. While the specific mechanisms mediating the unusually low Treg frequencies in HIV controllers remain unclear, a low Treg response is likely to have competing effects in this setting. For example, several studies have argued that that these cells are detrimental in HIV infection by inhibiting HIV-specific T cell responses
[56],
[57],
[58],
[59],
[60],
[61], while others have argued that these cells are beneficial by reducing generalized T cell activation
[62],
[63],
[64],
[65]. Inferring causal relationships is particularly challenging in cross-sectional studies of
in vivo Treg frequency in HIV-infected individuals since Tregs may be induced and expanded by viral replication and resultant inflammation
[36], but once induced, act to decrease inflammation. Accordingly, we observed that HIV controllers with higher levels of immune activation had higher frequencies of Tregs, suggesting that inflammation was driving the induction of Tregs. However, HIV controllers had lower Treg frequencies than HIV-uninfected individuals despite having much higher T cell activation, suggesting a strikingly low Treg response for the degree of immune activation observed. This unusually low Treg response in HIV controllers is therefore likely to be a significant contributor to the high generalized T cell activation and HIV-specific T cell responses observed. These results are consistent with a recent report of decreased inhibitory immunoregulatory receptor CTLA-4 expression on CD4+ T cells in HIV controllers
[66].
Our results differ from another recent report describing preserved Treg frequencies (as defined by FoxP3 expression) in the peripheral blood of a much smaller cohort of 12 HIV controllers
[50]. However, FoxP3 can be expressed early in the activation of effector CD4+ T cells without any regulatory function
[67],
[68],
[69],
[70],
[71],
[72], so the preserved FoxP3 expression described in that study may simply reflect the presence of recently activated effector CD4+ T cells, particularly since the co-expression of CD25 and FoxP3 in CD4+ T cells was not presented. Low expression of CD127, as measured in our study, may help distinguish Tregs from activated T cells and is now routinely used with CD25 to quantify the frequency of Tregs with suppressor function
[73],
[74],
[75]. It should be noted that among HIV-infected individuals with high levels of viral replication, gating on CD4+/CD25+/CD127
dim may include some cells that do not express FoxP3 and thereby lack regulatory function
[76]. However, Treg frequencies defined by CD4+/CD25+/CD127
dim and CD4+/CD25
hi/FoxP3+ are highly correlated in HIV-infected individuals with undetectable plasma HIV RNA levels (r

=

0.91, P<0.001)
[76]. Thus, the low frequency of CD4+/CD25+/CD127
dim cells we observed in HIV controllers relative to HIV-uninfected controls and ART-suppressed individuals (all groups with undetectable viremia) almost certainly reflects a low frequency of Tregs in HIV controllers. Lastly, even if HIV controllers had similar levels of Tregs to HIV-uninfected individuals as has been suggested in another recent report using HIV controller samples from the same cohort
[77], they would still have unusually low Treg frequencies relative to the expansion of activated T cells observed.
Consistent with the hypothesis that HIV controllers are predisposed to a weak Treg response to chronic viral infections, we observed significantly higher CMV-specific CD4+ T cell responses in HIV controllers than non-controllers and HIV-uninfected individuals. While we cannot exclude the possibility that greater CMV shedding explains the higher CMV-specific CD4+ T cell responses in HIV controllers, CMV shedding tends to be lower in individuals with higher CD4+ T cell counts and lower plasma HIV RNA levels
[78]. Thus, the expansion of CMV-specific CD4+ T cells in HIV controllers is unlikely to be driven by higher levels of antigen and is more likely to reflect a more robust proliferation of CD4+ T cells in response to CMV infection. HIV controllers co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) might also exhibit stronger HCV-specific responses than individuals with higher levels of HIV replication
[79]. While lower levels of HIV replication may allow for preservation of antigen-specific immune responses, the high CMV-specific CD4+ T cell frequency in HIV controllers relative to HIV-uninfected CMV-seropositive individuals cannot be explained by this mechanism alone. While another recent report suggested that HLA B5701+ elite controllers maintain similar CMV- and HCV-specific CD8+ T cell responses as non-controllers, CD4+ T cell responses were not assessed in that study
[80], and epidemiologic data suggest that HIV controllers are much more likely to spontaneously clear HCV than viremic HIV-infected individuals and HIV-uninfected individuals infected with HCV
[81].
In summary, we have observed that while most elite controllers maintain high HIV-specific T cell responses, most also have abnormally high generalized T cell activation levels, which may occasionally contribute to significant CD4 depletion even in the absence of clinically detectable viremia. Furthermore, those with the highest HIV-specific T cell responses have the highest levels of generalized immune activation, suggesting possible inflammatory consequences of T cell-mediated control of HIV replication. An unusually low regulatory T cell response to HIV infection may well explain this phenomenon. Perhaps the best immune response to HIV infection is one that maintains control of viral replication while minimizing negative inflammatory consequences. Some elite controllers are able to maintain this balance and understanding the mechanisms of control in these individuals is likely to have important implications for HIV vaccine research.