PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmjcrInstructions for authorsCurrent ToCBMJ Case Reports
 
BMJ Case Rep. 2010; 2010: bcr0820092177.
Published online Nov 12, 2010. doi:  10.1136/bcr.08.2009.2177
PMCID: PMC3029525
Learning from errors
Concomitant intestinal obstruction: a misleading diagnostic pitfall
Salomone Di Saverio,1,2 Gregorio Tugnoli,1 Luca Ansaloni,2 Fausto Catena,2 Andrea Biscardi,1 Elio Jovine,3 and Franco Baldoni1
1Emergency and Trauma Surgery Unit (Head Dr. G.Tugnoli), Department of Surgery and Emergency, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
2Department of Emergency, General and Multivisceral Transplant Surgery, S. Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
3Department of General Surgery (Head Prof. E. Jovine), Hepatobiliary and Pacreatic Surgery Unit, Bologna Local Health District, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
Correspondence to Salomone Di Saverio, salo75/at/inwind.it
Abstract
A 78-year-old man presented to the casualty department, complaining of recurrent and worsening constipation for the previous 2 months. This was associated with central, colicky abdominal pain and melena. In the last days, the symptoms worsened and the patient became partially obstructed, with nausea, vomiting and passing flatus but not stools for 72 h. The past medical history was unremarkable. The radiological findings of the plain abdominal film were consistent with mechanical small-bowel obstruction. CT scan revealed an intraluminal mass in the small bowel, which drew attention away from gross thickening of the caecal wall that was also present. A careful review of the images should not be omitted. One must be aware of a polymorphous appearance and the multiple causes of intestinal obstruction and avoid underestimating even the minor and less evident radiological findings.
Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of
BMJ Group