PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bmjcrInstructions for authorsCurrent ToCBMJ Case Reports
 
BMJ Case Rep. 2010; 2010: bcr12.2009.2525.
Published online Mar 4, 2010. doi:  10.1136/bcr.12.2009.2525
PMCID: PMC3027880
Reminder of important clinical lesson
Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury with “negative” cervical spine CT scan
Sreedhar Kolli,1 Adam Schreiber,2 James Harrop,3 and Jack Jallo3
1Rookwood Hospital, Spinal Rehabilitation, Fairwater Road, Llandaff, Cardiff CF5 2YN, UK
2Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Rehabilitation Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
3Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
Correspondence to Sreedhar Kolli, drkollisridhar2/at/hotmail.com
A 46-year-old man fell four steps, striking his neck and having associated neck pain and discomfort. He was evaluated at a local emergency department and reported no neurological deficit but focal mid cervical tenderness. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scan were “negative” for cervical spine fracture, dislocation or pre-vertebral soft tissue swelling. He was discharged home in a cervical collar with a scheduled outpatient follow-up. Over the proceeding hours neurologic deterioration occurred, including hand and lower limb weakness with the inability to urinate. The patient returned to the local emergency room and was transferred to a tertiary care hospital where examination revealed C5ASIAB deficits. Repeat high resolution CT scan of the cervical spine with reformatted images was unremarkable for osseous fractures except some loss of definition in the posterior cervical musculature. Emergency magnetic resonance imaging MRI revealed a subluxation of C5/6 right facet (not evident on CT) with disruption of the posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum, and disc space with abnormal T2 weighted spinal cord hyperintense signal at C5/6. He underwent emergency C5–C6 anterior and posterior decompression and fusion. One week later an examination showed improved C5ASIAD. This case reveals the difficulty of assessing the cervical spine for instability and potential limitations of current management schemes.
Cervical spine injuries are infrequent and account for a paucity of blunt trauma injuries.1 Davis et al reported, in a retrospective analysis of 740 patients with cervical spine injuries, an incidence of 4.6% of delay or misdiagnosed cervical spine injury.2 Reviews of the current literature or guidelines are incomplete in evaluating cervical spine injury.3,4
Patients with blunt trauma presenting awake and alert (no intoxicating medications), without distracting injury or neck tenderness, can be “cleared” if they have a full range of motion without pain.4 However, in the presence of neck pain, cervical radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scan are relied upon to evaluate for traumatic cervical spine injury.5 We present a case in which the patient was managed in a collar and still had a progressive neurologic deterioration.
The case is important for the following reasons:
  • The case reveals the difficulty of assessing the cervical spine for instability and potential limitations of current management schemes as most hospitals perform CT over magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the emergency setting.
  • Consequences of missing a spinal cord injury are grave.
  • It makes doctors rethink about their patients in grey areas of recommendations for spine imaging.
A 42-year-old man presented to a local emergency department with neck pain after reportedly falling asleep and falling from four steps. He denies loss of consciousness. His reported physical examination was normal except for focal neck pain including neurologic status. Imaging, including x-rays and CT scan of the cervical spine, were reported as “normal” according to the patient. He was discharged and recalled mild difficulty getting out of the taxi when he arrived home, requiring help. Overnight he developed difficulty with urination and weakness in his lower limbs progressing to his upper limbs. He returned to the emergency department with obvious neurologic deficit, and was transferred to a tertiary care facility where he was classified as a C5ASIAB.
Motor examination revealed 5/5 strength in the upper limbs with the exception of 2/5 in left elbow extensors, 3/5 strength of left wrist extensors, 1/5 in right elbow and wrist extensors, and 0/5 in bilateral finger flexors and abductors. Low limb motor power was 0/5. Sensory examination to pinprick and light touch was diminished caudally from C5 bilaterally. Proprioception at the great toes and ankles was absent. Bilateral biceps reflexes were 2/4 with absent triceps, brachioradialis, patella, and Achilles reflexes. Hoffman’s, plantar response and ankle clonus were absent. General tone was decreased in the lower limbs and normal in the upper limbs. Rectal examination had normal sensation to light touch and pinprick, voluntary anal contraction, and present bulbocavernosus reflex. Repeat cervical spine CT illustrated no osseous fractures or pre-vertebral soft tissue swelling, but did identify loss of the posterior muscle tissue lines (fig 1). Cervical spine MRI done immediately after completion of the CT revealed subluxation of C5 on C6 with disruption of the posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum and disc space with abnormal T2 weighted spinal cord hyperintensity from C5 through C6 (fig 2). The subluxation of the facet with minimal motion in a controlled environment while having his collar on illustrates the instability of this lesion. He underwent C5/6 anterior cervical discectomy, allograft fusion, anterior cervical plate, and subsequent posterior decompression and fusion. A week after the injury, his exam had improved to C5 ASIA D. He was discharged to the spinal cord injury model systems acute rehabilitation hospital.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Sagittal computed tomography scan without abnormality except loss of definition of posterior cervical musculature.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sagittal T2 magnetic resonance image with subluxation of C5 on C6 and disruption of the posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum and disc space with abnormal T2 weighted spinal cord hyperintensity from C5 through C6.
The identification of clinically significant ligamentous and osseous injuries can be extremely difficult. Clinical guidelines are an important aspect of evaluation and the treatment algorithm and their goals are to provide optimal patient care while limiting expense and costs to society. In this unique presentation the severity of the injury was not identified until the patient had a neurologic injury and subsequent MRI scan. Current literature and spine clearance guidelines do not justify performing a cervical MRI in the initial evaluation if the initial cervical CT scan is normal without concomitant high velocity trauma, unconsciousness or neurological deficit.3,4
Review of this particular case draws attention to our current treatment algorithm for neck trauma without neurologic deficits, loss of consciousness, high velocity trauma, and normal cervical CT. MRI is an extremely valuable imaging modality. Vaccaro et al reported 25% of patients with neurological deficits had their management altered with MRI.5 However, there are a limited number of resources and increased cost associated with their implementation. Also these studies can often lead to further confusion in the management of the patient. MRI is oversensitive and an increased T2 signal which is clinically insignificant may lead to unnecessary surgical intervention and/or prolonged immobilisation with their associated risks and increased health care costs.6
Learning points
  • Current clinical guidelines and literature do not recommend cervical MRI for low velocity blunt trauma if the CT scan is negative without neurologic deficit.
  • This case illustrates that the present algorithms are not absolute.
  • The addition of further imaging studies (MRI) should be instituted if a patient has any neurologic deterioration despite initial imaging algorithms.
  • It may be safe to admit patients with doubtful clinical history.
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Patient consent: Patient/guardian consent was obtained for publication.
1. Roberge RJ, Samuels JR. Cervical spine injury in low impact blunt trauma. Am J Emer Med 1999; 17: 125–9. [PubMed]
2. Davis JW, Phreaner DL, Hoyt DB, et al. The etiology of missed cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 1993; 34: 342–6. [PubMed]
3. Hoffmann JR, Wolfson AB, Todd K, et al. Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization study (NEXUS). Ann Emerg Med 1998; 32: 461–9. [PubMed]
4. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al. The Canadian C–spine rule for radiography in alert and stable patients. JAMA 2001; 286: 1841–8. [PubMed]
5. Vaccaro AR, Kreidl KO, Pan W, et al. Usefulness of MRI in isolated upper cervical spine fractures in adults. J Spinal Disord 1998; 11: 289–93. [PubMed]
6. Schuster R, Waxman K, Sanchez B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging is not needed to clear cervical spines in blunt trauma patients with normal computer topographic results and no motor deficits. Arch Sur 2005; 140: 762–6. [PubMed]
Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of
BMJ Group