1. Kegley JA. An ethical imperative: genetics education for physicians and patients. Med Law. 2003;22:275–283. [PubMed]
2. Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health and Society A roadmap for the integration of genetics and genomics into health and society. Washington, DC: Department of Human Health & Services; 2004.
3. Collins FS, Green ED, Guttmacher AE, Guyer MS, U. S. National Human Genome Research Institute A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature. 2003;422:835–847. [PubMed] 4. Lanie AD, Jayaratne TE, Sheldon JP, Kardia SL, Anderson ES, Feldbaum M, Petty EM. Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. J Genet Couns. 2004;13:305–320. [PubMed]
5. Genetics and Public Policy Center . Public awareness and knowledge. In: Kalfoglou A, et al., editors. Reproductive Genetic Testing: What America Thinks. Washington, DC: Genetics and Public Policy Center; 2004. pp. 7–10.
6. National Science Board Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. vol 1. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2008. Science and Technology: public attitudes and understanding; pp. 1–47.
7. Molster C, Charles T, Samanek A, O'Leary P. Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health. Public Health Genomics. 2009;12:84–91. [PubMed]
8. Human Genetics Commission: Public attitudes to human genetic information: people's panel quantitative study conducted for the Human Genetics Commission, 2001, London, UK.
9. Durant, Hansen A, Bauer M. Public understanding of the new genetics. In: Marteau T, Richards M, editors. The Troubled Helix. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 235–248.
10. Clark NM, Gong M, Kaciroti N. A model of self-regulation for control of chronic disease. Health Educ Behav. 2001;28:769–782. [PubMed] 11. Offit K. Genomic profiles for disease risk: predictive or premature? JAMA. 2008;299:1353–1355. [PubMed] 12. Mittman IS, Secundy MG. A national dialogue on genetics and minority issues. Community Genet. 1998;1:190–200. [PubMed]
13. Citrin T, Modell S, Gwinn MD, Bedrosian S, Ottman D, Khoury MD. Genomics and Population Health: United States 2003. Atlanta, GA: The Office of Genomics and Disease Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); 2004. Chapter 8: Genomics and public health: ethical, legal, and social issues; pp. 851–859.
14. Jallinoja P, Aro AR. Does knowledge make a difference? The association between knowledge about genes and attitudes toward gene tests. J Health Commun. 2000;5:29–39. [PubMed]
15. Garland MJ. Experts and the public: a needed partnership for genetic policy. Public Underst Sci. 1999;8:241–254.
16. Markel H. The stigma of disease: implications of genetic screening. Am J Med. 1992;93:209–215. [PubMed] 17. Pernick MS. Eugenics and public health in American history. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1767–1772. [PubMed] 18. Keller J. In genes we trust: the biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88:686–702. [PubMed]
19. Yzerbyt V, Estrada C, Corneille O, Seron E, Demoulin S. Subjective essentialism in action: self-anchoring and social control as consequences of fundamental social divides. In: Yzerbyt V, Judd CM, Corneille O, editors. The Psychology of Group Perception: Perceived Variability, Entitativity, and Essentialism. New York: Psychology Press; 2004. pp. 101–124.
20. Bastian B, Haslam N. Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2006;42:228–235.
21. Feldman MW, Lewontin RC, King M. Race: a genetic melting-pot. Nature. 2003;424:374. [PubMed] 22. Smedley A, Smedley BD. Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. Am Psychol. 2005;60:16–26. [PubMed] 23. Cooper RS, Kaufman JS, Ward R. Race and genomics. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1166–1170. [PubMed]
24. Prentice DA, Miller DT. Psychological essentialism of human categories. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16:202–206.
25. Ponder M, Lee J, Green J, Richards M. Family history and perceived vulnerability to some common diseases: a study of young people and their parents. J Med Genet. 1996;33:485–492. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Emslie C, Hunt K, Watt G. A chip off the old block? Lay understandings of inheritance among men and women in mid-life. Public Underst Sci. 2003;12:47–65.
27. Scheuner MT, Sieverding P, Shekelle PG. Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;299:1320–1334. [PubMed] 28. Walter FM, Emery J, Braithwaite D, Marteau TM. Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:583–594. [PubMed] 29. Singer E, Antonucci T, Van Hoewyk J. Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing. Genet Test. 2004;8:31–43. [PubMed] 30. Donovan KA, Tucker DC. Knowledge about genetic risk for breast cancer and perceptions of genetic testing in a sociodemographically diverse sample. J Behav Med. 2000;23:15–36. [PubMed] 31. Lerman C, Narod S, Schulman K, Hughes C, Gomez-Caminero A, Bonney G, Gold K, Trock B, Main D, Lynch J, Fulmore C, Snyder C, Lemon SJ, Conway T, Tonin P, Lenoir G, Lynch H. BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes. JAMA. 1996;275:1885–1892. [PubMed] 32. Sheldon JP, Jayaratne TE, Feldbaum M, DiNardo CD, Petty EM. Applications and implications of advances in human genetics: perspectives from a group of black Americans. Community Genet. 2007;10:82–92. [PubMed]
33. Dean C: Women in Science: The Battle Moves to the Trenches. New York Times, 12/19/2006, p F.1.
35. Arcury TA, Skelly AH, Gesler WM, Dougherty MC. Diabetes meanings among those without diabetes: explanatory models of immigrant Latinos in rural North Carolina. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:2183–2193. [PubMed]
36. Richards M. Lay and professional knowledge of genetics and inheritance. Public Underst Sci. 1996;5:217–230.
37. Richards M, Ponder M. Lay understanding of genetics: a test of a hypothesis. J Med Genet. 1996;33:1032–1036. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 38. Jayaratne TE, Gelman SA, Feldbaum M, Sheldon JP, Petty EM, Kardia SL. The perennial debate: nature, nurture, or choice? Black and White Americans' explanations for individual differences. Rev Gen Psychol. 2009;13:24–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Jayaratne TE, Ybarra O, Sheldon JP, Brown TN, Feldbaum M, Pfeffer CA, Petty EM. White Americans' genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: their relationship with prejudice toward blacks, and gay men and lesbians. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2006;9:77–94.
40. Leyser da Rosa V, Solomon J. When science and the public meet: training for genetic counseling. Public Underst Sci. 1998;7:271–284.
41. Smerecnik CM, Mesters I, de Vries NK, de Vries H. Educating the general public about multifactorial genetic disease: applying a theory-based framework to understand current public knowledge. Genet Med. 2008;10:251–258. [PubMed] 42. Ondrusek N, Warner E, Goel V. Development of a knowledge scale about breast cancer and heredity (BCHK) Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999;53:69–75. [PubMed]
43. Lee ES, Forthofer RN. Analyzing Complex Survey Data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2006.
44. Kessler L, Collier A, Halbert C. Knowledge about genetics among African Americans. J Genet Couns. 2007;16:191–200. [PubMed]
45. Kozol J. Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools. New York: Crown Publishers; 1991.
46. Yzerbyt V, Corneille O, Estrada C. The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2001;5:141–155.
47. Cole ER, Jayaratne TE, Cecchi LA, Feldbaum M, Petty EM. Vive la différence? Genetic explanations for perceived gender differences in nurturance. Sex Roles. 2007;57:211–222.
48. Hughes M, Tuch SA. Gender differences in whites racial attitudes: are women's attitudes really more favorable? Soc Psychol Q. 2003;66:384–401.
49. Blakely EL, He L, Taylor RW, Chinnery PF, Lightowlers RN, Schaefer AM, Turnbull DM. Mitochondrial DNA deletion in ‘identical’ twin brothers. J Med Genet. 2004;41:e19. [PMC free article] [PubMed] 50. Bowling BV, Acra EE, Wang L, Myers MF, Dean GE, Markle GC, Moskalik CL, Huether CA. Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates. Genetics. 2008;178:15–22. [PubMed] 51. Erby LH, Roter D, Larson S, Cho J. The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL-G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:174–181. [PubMed]
52. Messick S. Response sets. In: Sills DL, editor. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan; 1968. pp. 492–496.
53. Aday LA. Formatting questions about knowledge and attitudes; in Designing and Conducting Health Surveys. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996. pp. 243–260.
54. Schunk DH, Pintrich PR, Meece JL. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall; 2008.
55. Graham S, Taylor A. Ethnicity, gender, and the development of achievement values. In: Wigfield A, Eccles JS, editors. Development of Achievement Motivation. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002. pp. 121–146.