|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The EML4-ALK fusion gene has been detected in ~7% of Japanese non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). We determined the frequency of EML4-ALK in Caucasian NSCLCs and in NSCLC cell lines. We also determined whether TAE684, a specific ALK kinase inhibitor, would inhibit the growth of EML4-ALK containing cell lines in vitro and in vivo.
We screened 305 primary NSCLCs (both US (n=138) and Korean (n=167) patients) and 83 NSCLC cell lines using RT-PCR and by exon array analyses. We evaluated the efficacy of TAE684 against NSCLC cell lines in vitro and in vivo.
We detected 4 different variants, including two novel variants, of EML4-ALK using RT-PCR in 8/305 tumors (3%) and in 3/83 (3.6%) NSCLC cell lines. All EML4-ALK containing tumors and cell lines were adenocarcinomas. EML4-ALK was detected more frequently in NSCLC patients who were never or light (< 10 pack years) cigarette smokers compared to current/former smokers (6% vs. 1%; p=0.049). TAE684 inhibited the growth of 1 of 3 (H3122) EML4-ALK containing cell lines in vitro and in vivo, inhibited Akt phosphorylation and caused apoptosis. In another EML4-ALK cell line, DFCI032, TAE684 was ineffective due to co-activation of EGFR and ERBB2. The combination of TAE684 and CL-387,785 (EGFR/ERBB2 kinase inhibitor), inhibited growth and Akt phosphorylation and led to apoptosis in the DFCI032 cell line.
EML4-ALK is found in the minority of NSCLCs. ALK kinase inhibitors alone or in combination may nevertheless be clinically effective treatments for NSCLC patients whose tumors contain EML4-ALK.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) kinase was originally discovered from chromosomal translocations leading to the production of fusion proteins consisting of the C-terminal kinase domain of ALK and the N-terminal portions of different genes (1). Translocations of ALK have been identified in 40–60% of anaplastic lymphomas and in B-cell lymphomas, neuroblastomas, and myofibroblastic tumors (2). Nucleophosmin (NPM) is the most common fusion partner of ALK (80% of translocations) but at least six other fusion partners have been identified (2). In these fusion proteins, the N-terminal portion is responsible for protein oligomerization, which leads to constitutive activation of ALK kinase, and results in aberrant activation of downstream signalling targets including Akt, STAT3, and extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) (2).
The fusion of the ALK gene with echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) has recently been detected in 6.7% (5/75) of Japanese non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) (3). ALK and EML4 are both located in the short arm of chromosome 2 separated by 12 megabases and are oriented in opposite 5′ to 3′ directions. Two different variants of EML4-ALK fusion gene have been characterized both involving exons 20-29 of ALK fused to exon 1-13 (variant 1) or 1–20 (variant 2) of EML4. Both variants of the EML4-ALK fusion gene were transforming in 3T3 cells and in Ba/F3 models (3).
Inhibitors of ALK kinase have been developed and examined in preclinical models. Proof of concept studies using shRNA knockdown of ALK in NPM-ALK containing models led to growth inhibition and apoptosis and suggested that ALK inhibition may be a potentially effective therapeutic strategy (4). This has lead to development and testing of small molecule inhibitors of ALK. Initial studies have been performed using less potent ALK inhibitors such as WHI-P154 (IC50 ~5μM), pyridones (IC50 for staurosporine 0.15–0.78μM) or with HSP90 inhibitors (5). Subsequently, more potent and specific ALK inhibitors such as diamino or aminopyrimidines have been developed including TAE684 and PF02341066 (6–8). Both of these inhibitors have good bioavailability and they inhibit ALK kinase activity and growth of NPM-ALK positive lymphoma cells in the low nanomolar range (6–8). PF02341066 is an inhibitor of both MET and ALK presently in phase I clinical development. TAE684 is not currently under clinical development. Neither agent has previously been examined against EML4-ALK.
In the current study we analyzed the frequency of the EML4-ALK fusion gene in NSCLC cell lines and tumors derived from US and Korean NSCLC patients. In addition we examined the efficacy of an ALK kinase inhibitor, TAE684, in NSCLC cell lines harboring the EML4-ALK inversion to determine if this would be a potentially effective therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients whose tumors contain the EML4-ALK inversion (6).
NSCLC (n=81) and mesothelioma (n=2) cell lines were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA), or were kind gifts from Drs. John D. Minna and Adi F. Gazdar (UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX) (Table S1). DFCI024 and DFCI032 were established at DFCI from pleural effusions of treatment naïve female NSCLC patients. The PC9, A549, H3122 and H2228 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml streptomycin and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. The DFCI032 cells were cultured in ACL-4 media (Invitrogen, Rockville, MD) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml streptomycin and 1 mM sodium pyruvate.
NSCLC tumors (n = 305) were collected from surgical resections from patients with stages I–IIII NSCLC when sufficient material for RNA extraction was available. The majority of the specimens (n = 167) were collected at the Samsung Medical Center, Korea. Frozen tumor tissues were collected from 809 out of 2442 patients who underwent curative resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from Nov. 1995 to Feb. 2007 at Samsung Medical Center. One or two pieces from the periphery of the tumor masses—avoiding necrotic regions—were immediately frozen at −80°C until retrieved. The medical records and also hematoxylin/eosin-stained slides of the specimen were reviewed by a single pathologist. Only frozen tumor tissues from adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (according to the 2004 World Health Organization histopathological criteria) were included. Only frozen tumor tissues with a tumor cell content of more than 70% were used for further analysis. In addition, frozen tumor tissues of the following patients were excluded from the study: patients who had received preoperative neoadjuvant treatments, patients with double primary lung cancer, and patients who had undergone incomplete resections or who had not been subjected to mediastinal lymph node dissections. The selected frozen tumor tissues were used for the microdissection. Briefly frozen tissues were lightly stained with hematoxylin/eosin to improve visualization and the necrotic tumor tissues and intervening normal tissues were removed. Each of the microdissected tumor tissues with a tumor cell content of more than 90% was placed in 1 ml Easy Blue reagent of a commercially available RNA isolation kit (easy-spin™ Total RNA Extraction Kit, iNtRON Biotechnology, Korea), immediately homogenized by vortexing, and the total RNA was extracted. The quantity and quality of RNA were analyzed using a spectrometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Rockland, DE) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit, Agilent Technologies Inc., Germany), respectively. In the end, 167 frozen tissues with acceptable quality of RNA [RNA Integrity Number (RIN) value over 7.0] were used for the current studies. All patients provided written informed consent.
The tumors from Caucasian patients (n = 138) were collected at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA between 1991 and 1997 and have been previously published (9, 10). Frozen samples of resected lung tumors were obtained within 30 minutes of resection and subdivided into 100 mg samples and snap frozen at −80 C. Each specimen was associated with an immediately adjacent sample embedded for histology in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) medium and stored at −80 C. Six micron frozen sections of embedded samples stained with hematoxylin/eosin (H&E) was used to confirm the post operative pathologic diagnosis and to estimate the cellular composition of adjacent samples. All specimens underwent pathologic review by 2 pathologists. 109 tumors obtained during the same time period were excluded because they did not meet one or more of the eligibility criteria. Tissue samples were homogenized in Trizol (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) and RNA was extracted and purified by using the RNeasy column purification kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Denaturing formaldehyde gel electrophoresis followed by northern blotting using a beta-actin probe assessed RNA integrity. Samples were excluded if beta-actin was not full-length. All patients provided written informed consent.
Cell line specimens were snap frozen, and stored at −80C. RNA was extracted from tumors and cell lines using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), purified with Rneasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and was used for cDNA synthesis using the QuantiTect reverse transcription kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).
To screen for ALK translocations, we used Affymetrix HuEx-1.0 Exon Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) data that was previously generated from these cell lines (R.K. Thomas, C.H. Mermel, D. Chiang, and M. Meyerson, unpublished results). The HuEx-1.0 array was designed to contain probes mapping to every known and predicted exon in the human genome. We reasoned that translocations in the ALK gene would result in disparate levels of expression between exons 5′ and 3′ of the breakpoint, with the expression higher in the 3′ end (kinase domain). After performing array normalization and background correction for all probes, we restricted our analysis to the 104 probes uniquely mapping to the ALK gene (Refseq NM_004304). To correct for differences in probe response characteristics across the gene, for every sample we divided each probe intensity value by the average probe intensity across the other wild type specimens. For each cell line, we computed the location of the most likely breakpoint as the probe which gives the maximum deviation between average expression of 5′ and 3′ probe subsets. Significance levels for each inferred breakpoint were computed using a simple two-sided t-test.
For RT-PCR analysis of EML4-ALK, we used primer sequences (primer set 1) as described in (3). The forward primer is located at exon 13 of EML4 while the reverse primer is located at exon 20 of ALK. In order to detect other potential EML4-ALK fusion products, we designed a second forward primer from exon 3 of EML4 (5′-taccagtgctgtctcaattgcagg-3′) while using the same reverse primer as the primer set 1. PCR amplification was performed using JumpStart Taq enzyme (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) under manufacturer’s guidelines. The resulting PCR products were analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis. Genotyping for KRAS, EGFR, HER2, BRAF and PIK3CA was performed using either a RT-PCR based or a genomic DNA based SURVEYOR-WAVE mutation analysis (11) followed by sequencing of the positive specimens or by direct sequencing of the PCR products. Primer sequences and PCR conditions are available upon request.
Bacterial artificial chromosomes (BAC) RP11-667I6 and RP11-100C1 (Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, CA) were used as probes for the EML4 and ALK genes, respectively. BAC DNA was labeled with either spectrum red dUTP or spectrum green-11-dUTP by nick translation (Vysis, Des Plain, IL) using manufacturer’s recommended conditions. Slides for metaphase FISH from cell lines were prepared using standard cytogenetic methodologies. Paraffin embedded slides were prepared as previously described in (11). Probes were hybridized and washed according to standard FISH procedures (12).
TAE684 was synthesized according to published procedures (13). The structure of TAE684 was confirmed using liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The synthesized TAE684 was determined to be 98% pure by 1H NMR and 99% pure by LC-MS monitoring at 210nm and 254nm wavelengths (data not shown). CL-387,785 was purchased from Calbiochem (Gibbstown, NJ). Erlotinib was purchased from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute pharmacy. All drugs were dissolved in DMSO, stored at −70C and diluted in fresh media prior to use.
Growth inhibition was assessed by MTS assay as described in (11). NSCLC cells were exposed to drugs alone or in combination for 72 hours. All experimental points were set up in six to twelve wells and repeated at least three times. The data was graphically displayed using GraphPad Prism version 3.00 for Windows, (GraphPad Software; www.graphpad.com). The curves were fitted using a non-linear regression model with a sigmoidal dose response.
Cells were lysed in buffer containing proteinase inhibitors, proteins separated by gel electrophoresis on 5–12% polyacrylamide gels selected depending on the target’s molecular weight, transferred to PVDF membranes and detected by immunoblotting using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) as previously described (11). The receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) array was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) and used according to the manufacturer’s recommended conditions. Anti-ALK, anti-phospho-ALK (Tyr-1604), anti-phospho-Akt (Ser-473), anti-Akt, anti-STAT3, anti-phospho STAT3 (Tyr705), anti-PTEN, and anti-PARP antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Total ERK1/2 and phospho-ERK1/2 (pT185/pY187) antibodies were purchased from Biosource International (Camarillo, CA). The anti-α-tubulin antibody was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Cells were plated at a density of 0.5 to 2 × 105 cells/plate in 10-cm2 plates. Drugs were added to the medium after 24 h, and the cells were incubated for another 72 h, after which the cells were analyzed as previously described (14). Percent apoptosis was estimated from the sub-G1 cell fraction.
Nude mice (nu/nu; 6–8 weeks old; Charles River Laboratories) were used for in vivo studies and were cared for in accordance with the standards of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under a protocol approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Mice were anesthetized using a 2% Isoflurane (Baxter) inhalation oxygen mixture. A suspension of 5×106 H3122 lung cancer cells (in 0.2 ml of PBS) were inoculated subcutaneously into the lower-right quadrant of the flank of each mouse. Mice were randomized to 4 treatment groups (n=5 per group) once the mean tumor volume reached 500–600 mm3: vehicle (NMP (10% 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone: 90% PEG-300) alone, erlotinib, TAE684 10 mg/kg/day and TAE684 25 mg/kg/day p.o. (6). Erlotinib was administered at 100mg/kg/day p.o. as previously described (11). Tumors were measured twice weekly using calipers, and volume was calculated using the formula (length × width2 × 0.52). Mice were monitored daily for body weight and general condition. The experiment was terminated when the mean size of either the treated or control groups reached 2000 mm3.
In order to rapidly screen our panel of 83 lung cancer cell lines (Table S1) for potential ALK translocations, we used Affymetrix HuEx-1.0 mRNA exon arrays and focused on 104 unique probes covering the ALK gene. We identified two cell lines, H3122 and H2228, which had statistically significant (p < .001) breakpoints in the ALK gene (Figs 1A and S1). Although our algorithm did not consider the location or direction of the breakpoint, the inferred ALK breakpoints in both samples were very near the conserved exon 20 breakpoint in the ALK gene, and in both samples the expression was higher in the 3′ than the 5′ ends. Using RT-PCR, we were able to confirm the presence of the EML4-ALK fusion gene product in both H3122 and H2228 but not in any other of the 81 cell lines. In H3122 we detected variant 1 of EML4-ALK (Figs. 1B and 1C). In H2228 we detected a novel variant (named variant 3a hereafter) resulting from a fusion of exon 6 (codons 1-222) of EML4 with exon 20 (codons 1058-1621) of ALK (Figs. 1C and S2). A second fusion gene (variant 3b) was also detected from this cell line and contains an additional 33bp fragment derived from an alternatively spliced exon of EML4 (exon 6b; Figs. 1C and S2) and is the predominant form in H2228 (data not shown). This alternatively spliced exon was not detected in any of the other fusion variants. As both H3122 and H2228 cell lines were established from female NSCLC patients with adenocarcinoma and H2228 is from a never-smoker, we screened for the presence of EML4-ALK in NSCLC cell lines with these clinical features that we had established at Dana Farber Cancer Institute. We identified 2 cell lines, DFCI024 and DFCI032, both derived from chemotherapy naïve female never-smokers with adenocarcinoma. Both cell lines are wild type for EGFR and KRAS. We detected variant 1 of the EML4-ALK fusion gene in the DFCI032 cell line and neither variant in DFCI024 (Fig. 1B). Overall, we detected the EML4-ALK fusion gene in 3/83 (3.6%) NSCLC cell lines. We further confirmed the presence of the EML4-ALK inversion using FISH (Fig. S3) in these 3 cell lines (Fig. 2A–2C). In addition, we confirmed the presence of the EML4-ALK fusion in the original tumor specimen that gave rise to the DFCI032 cell line using interphase FISH (Fig 2D).
We screened NSCLC (n=305) from patients of U.S. (n=138) and Korean (n=167) origin for the EML4-ALK fusion gene and detected its presence in 8/305 (3%) NSCLCs (Table 1). Four tumors contained variant 3 (both variants 3a and 3b with 3b being predominant), two contained variant 1 and two contained a novel variant (named variant 4 here after) (Fig 1B and 1C). In variant 4, exon 15 of EML4 is fused with exon 20 of ALK (EML4 codons 1-569 to codons 1078-1621 of ALK; Figs.1C and S2). Six of the EML4-ALK containing tumors (6/167; 3.6%) were from Korean patients while two (2/138 (1.5%)) were detected in NSCLCs from U.S. patients. The frequency of EML4-ALK was higher in females (4%) vs. males (2%). All eight of the EML4-ALK containing tumors were adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, the fusion gene was detected significantly (p=0.049; Table 1) more frequently in patients (6%; 4/69) with limited smoking history (≤ 10 pack years) compared to tumors from smokers (1%; 2/184). The tumor from one of the patients had a concurrent EGFR kinase domain mutation (del E746_A750) with the EML4-ALK fusion gene. None of the eight tumors contained a concurrent KRAS or BRAF mutation (data not shown).
In order to determine whether ALK kinase inhibitors may be therapeutically effective in EML4-ALK containing NSCLCs, we evaluated TAE684, a highly potent ALK kinase inhibitor (6). We found that TAE684 significantly inhibited the growth of only the H3122 cell line while the other two EML4-ALK containing cell lines, H2228 and DFCI032, were as resistant (IC50s 1–10μM) to the inhibitor as those containing an EGFR mutation (PC-9; delE746_A750) or a KRAS mutation (A549; G12S) (Fig. 3A). It should be noted that the IC50 for the H3122 cells is 10nM and that TAE684 exhibits its maximal effects in this responsive cell line at 100nM (Fig 3A). At these low concentrations TAE684 is highly selective for ALK, and therefore the observed response is not likely to be due to off-target effects (6). Conversely, the effects on the EGFR mutant PC9 and KRAS mutant A549 cells, which are not ALK dependent for their growth, at concentrations > 1 μM are likely to be due to off-target effects and thus we used 100 nM TAE684 for subsequent studies. TAE684 (100 nM) treatment led to significant apoptosis only in the H3122 cell line as detected by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) (Fig. 3B) or by Western blotting for cleaved PARP (Fig. 3C). No growth arrest or apoptosis was observed in the other cell lines following TAE684 treatment.
In order to determine why the growth of only 1/3 of the EML4-ALK containing cell lines was inhibited by TAE684 we examined its effects on phosphorylation of ALK and downstream signalling proteins (Fig. 3D). Following 100 nM TAE684 treatment, complete inhibition of phosphorylated ALK was observed in all three of the EML4-ALK positive cell lines (Fig. 3D). However, this was accompanied by substantial inhibition of Akt, and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation only in the H3122 cell line consistent with the effects on cell growth and apoptosis in this cell line (Fig 3A–C). In contrast to Akt and ERK 1/2, there was only a minimal decrease in STAT3 phosphorylation following TAE684 treatment in the H3122 cell line (Fig. 3D). In the H2228 cell line there was some but not complete inhibition of Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation while these were unchanged in the DFCI032 cell line (Fig. 3D).
We also examined the effects of TAE684 treatment on H3122 in vivo using a xenograft model. We compared the effects of TAE684 to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase inhibitor erlotinib which did not inhibit the growth of H3122 cells in vitro (IC50 > 10 μM; data not shown). We used erlotinib because we detected EML4-ALK significantly more frequently in never or former light cigarette smokers with NSCLC (Table 1) and because erlotinib is frequently used in clinical trials in this same patient population(11, 15). Thus we wished to determine the efficacy of erlotinib in EML4-ALK containing NSCLC. We also explored the dosing of TAE684 by examining 2 different doses in the xenograft studies. As can be seen in Figure 4, both doses of TAE684 effectively inhibited the growth of H3122 xenografts. Both vehicle and erlotinib treated mice were all sacrificed following 2 weeks of treatment due to rapid tumor growth. These are consistent with the effects of erlotinib in vitro (data not shown). The higher dose of TAE-684 (25 mg/kg/day) more effectively inhibited tumor growth than the lower (10 mg/kg/day) dose (Fig. 4). The 25 mg/kg/day dose was associated with an initial shrinkage of established tumors followed by stabilization. All mice were sacrificed at day 53 of treatment.
In the DFCI032 cell line, which contains the exact same EML4-ALK variant as H3122 (Fig. 1B), TAE684 completely inhibited ALK phosphorylation but this was not accompanied by inhibition of growth or changes in phosphorylation of Akt or ERK 1/2 (Fig 3A and D). DFCI032 is not a heterogeneous cell line as by FISH we were able to detect EML4-ALK in 100% of the cells (data not shown). We also did not detect a concurrent mutation in the known oncogenes (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, HER2 or PIK3CA) commonly mutated in NSCLC in the DFCI032 cell line (data not shown). Recent studies have demonstrated that in some cancers multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) can be co-activated (11, 16). Inhibition of only one of the co-activated kinases is insufficient to result in inhibition of growth or Akt phosphorylation (11, 16). In order to determine whether DFCI032 contained other activated kinases we performed a screen using a phospho-RTK array comprising of 42 receptor tyrosine kinases. As can be seen in Figure 5A, the 2 most intense signals detected in this array were for phosphorylated EGFR and ERBB2. Low level activation of other RTKs were also observed but the signals were substantially weaker than for EGFR and ERBB2 (Fig. 5A). ALK is not present on this array (data not shown). We next examined the effects of CL-387,785 (1 μM), an irreversible EGFR and ERBB2 inhibitor, alone or in combination with TAE684 (100 nM) in the DFCI032 cell line. The combination of CL,387,785 and TAE684, but not either agent alone, significantly inhibited the growth of DFCI032 cells and was associated with significant apoptosis (Fig 5C and D). Furthermore, only the combination of TAE684 and CL-387,785 was associated inhibition of Akt and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation (Fig 5D). We also examined the combination of the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib (1 μM) and TAE684 (100 nM) and observed no effect on growth of DFCI032 cells (data not shown). These findings suggest that inhibition of both EGFR and ERBB2 along with ALK is necessary to effectively inhibit growth and induce apoptosis in the DFCI032 cell line.
The use of molecular targeted therapy in genetically defined subsets of cancer patients is emerging as an effective therapeutic strategy for many cancers (17–19). In lung cancer for example, 10–30% of NSCLCs contain activating mutations in the EGFR kinase domain and 60–80% of the patients with EGFR mutations obtain dramatic radiographic responses following treatment with the EGFR kinase inhibitors gefitinib or erlotinib (11, 19). Similarly, EGFR mutant NSCLC cell lines are exquisitely sensitive to gefitinib in vitro compared with EGFR wild type cell lines and only EGFR mutant NSCLC cell lines undergo apoptosis following gefitinib treatment (14, 20, 21). Thus it remains critical to identify subsets of lung cancer patients and to develop effective therapeutic strategies for such patients. As lung cancer is a very common cancer, the identification of even small subsets of lung cancer patients harbouring specific genetic alterations will translate into a large cohort of patients.
In the present study we characterized the frequency of the EML4-ALK inversion in NSCLC cell lines and primary tumors from NSCLC patients of different ethnic backgrounds. We detected the EML4-ALK fusion gene in 3% of NSCLC specimens, numerically more frequently from Korean than US NSCLC patients, adenocarcinomas and in patients with limited cigarette smoke exposure. Our study is the first example addressing the frequency of EML4-ALK in Caucasian NSCLC patients. Despite the low frequency of EML4-ALK in NSCLC, this represents more patients (~5000 annually in U.S.) than those diagnosed with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) where ALK translocations have previously been detected (22, 23). We detected EML4-ALK significantly more frequently (Table 1) from NSCLC patients who were either never or former light (≤ 10 pack years) cigarette smokers. This same clinical feature has also been shown to predict for presence of EGFR mutations (24). Thus it is possible that NSCLC arising in never/former light smokers are genetically and biologically different from those arising in smokers and more likely to contain activated oncogenes. We detected 4 different variants of EML4-ALK (Fig. 1) containing virtually identical portions of ALK, comprising the entire kinase domain, with varying portions of EML4. These variants are similar to previously described translocations of ALK with other genes; all of which contain the cytoplasmic portion and entire tyrosine kinase domain of ALK (22). We also developed a FISH assay which can be used to detect the EML4-ALK inversion from routine paraffin embedded lung cancer clinical specimens. This will facilitate the identification of appropriate NSCLC patients for clinical studies of ALK kinase inhibitors.
One of the three cell lines with the EML4-ALK translocation (H3122) was also found to be exquisitely sensitive to TAE684 in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 3A and and4).4). In addition, TAE684 treatment was associated with significant apoptosis and downregulation of Akt and ERK 1/2 signaling (Fig 3B.–D.). These findings suggest the phenomenon of oncogene addiction where ALK kinase solely controls the critical survival signalling pathways in this cell line (25). ALK inhibition leads to inhibition of all of these signalling pathways and subsequently to apoptosis. This is analogous to gefitinib treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC and suggests that ALK kinase inhibitors alone may be effective therapies at least for some patients whose tumors contain EML4-ALK (14, 26). Interestingly TAE-684 led to only a minimal decrease in STAT3 phosphorylation in H3122 despite causing apoptosis in this cell line (Fig. 3D). STAT3 has been shown to be critical to NPM-ALK mediated lyphomagenesis and inhibition of STAT3 alone using a dominant negative STAT3 is sufficient to induce apoptotis (27, 28). There may be signalling differences between NPM-ALK and EML4-ALK containing tumors or this may reflect differences between NSCLC and ALCL. Further studies will be are necessary to determine the significance of STAT3 signalling in EML4-ALK containing NSCLC.
Only 1 of 3 NSCLC cell lines (H3122) with EML4-ALK was sensitive to the ALK kinase inhibitor alone. The 2 other EML4-ALK containing cell lines were either resistant to TAE684 alone (H2228) or required concomitant inhibition of EGFR and ERBB2 (DFCI032). These findings are quite different from EGFR mutant NSCLC cell lines where the majority are exquisitely sensitive to gefitinib or erlotinib in vitro and the growth inhibition is accompanied by apoptosis and significant inhibition of EGFR, ERK 1/2 and Akt phosphorylation (14, 29, 30). These differences may be clinically significant and highlight the possibility that ALK inhibitors alone may only be effective in a subset of NSCLC patients with the EML4-ALK inversion. Our studies of DFCI032 suggest that it contains co-activation of both EGFR and ERBB2 as concomitant inhibition of ALK, EGFR and ERBB2 is required to significantly effect growth, induce apoptosis and inhibit Akt and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation (Figure 5). Thus our findings provide one potential mechanism, activation of other receptor tyrosine kinases, by which resistance could emerge in NSCLC patients being treated with ALK inhibitors. In addition, these data suggest that in some EML4-ALK containing NSCLC, a combination therapeutic strategy may be necessary. Our findings are analogous to those found in subsets of glioblastoma multiforme and in MET amplified gefitinib resistant lung cancers where multiple kinases are co-activated and inhibition of one kinase alone is not sufficient to effect growth or lead to down regulation of Akt (11, 16). In H2228 we did not detect co-activation of another kinase (data not shown). The lack of efficacy of TAE684 in our study in H2228 is similar with recent studies using an ALK specific siRNA which also did not inhibit the growth of H2228 cells (31). It will continue to be important to study H2228 and other EML4-ALK containing tumors in order to determine whether an ALK inhibitor alone or in combination with other kinase inhibitors will be necessary for growth inhibition and apoptosis.
This study is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health 1RO1CA114465-01 (P.A.J.), American Cancer Society RSG-06-102-01-CCE (P.A.J. and J.A.E.), Finnish Medical Foundation (J.P.K), Finnish Cultural Foundation (J.P.K), and Academy of Finland (J.P.K.) and the Hazel and Samuel Bellin research fund (P.A.J.). P.A.J. and M.M. are part of a pending patent application on EGFR mutations.