|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
There is debate on optimal techniques that reduce bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A national survey of Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS) members was carried out to determine current surgical practice for gallstones, including the use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) or critical view of safety to reduce the risk of bile duct injury.
An anonymous postal survey was sent to all 417 AUGIS members. Data on grade of surgeon, place of work (district general hospital, teaching), subspecialty, number LC per year, use of IOC, critical view of safety, and management of stones detected during surgery were collated.
There was a 36% (152/417) response – 134 (88%) from consultant surgeons (36, HPB; 106,OG; 64, DGH; 88, teaching hospital). Of these, 38% performed > 100 LC per year, 36% 50–100 LC per year, and 22% 25–50 LC per year. IOC was routine for 24%; and selective for 72%. Critical view of Calot's triangle was advocated by 82%. Overall, 55% first clip and divide the cystic artery, whereas 41% first clip and divide the cystic duct. Some 39% recommend IOC and 23% pre-oper-ative MRCP if dilated common bile duct (CBD) is noted on pre-operative ultrasound. When bile duct stones are identified on IOC, 61% perform laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE), 25% advise postoperative ERCP, and 13% perform either LCBDE or ERCP. Overall, 88% (n = 134) recommend index cholecystectomy for acute pathology, and this is more likely in a teaching hospital setting (P= 0.003). Laparoscopic CBD exploration was more likely to be performed in university hospitals (P< 0.05).
A wide dissection of Calot's triangle to provide a critical view of safety is the technique most commonly recommended by AUGIS surgeons (83%) to minimise risk of bile duct injury, in contrast to 24% that recommend routine IOC. The majority (88%) of AUGIS surgeons advise index admission cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease.
The role of routine intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) during cholecystectomy has been controversial ever since its introduction by Mirizzi in 1931. 1 The recent introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the reported associated increase in bile duct injury has further fuelled the debate on the optimal role of IOC.2 Protagonists of routine IOC cite the reduced risk of common bile duct (CBD) injury3 and the detection of asymptomatic CBD stones4 as reasonable justification for this policy. In contrast, the opponents of routine IOC state this to be unnecessary biliary instrumentation with inherent morbidity and mortality.5,6
A wide dissection of Calot's triangle to provide a ‘critical view of safety’ is generally accepted as a safe alternative to IOC as this provides an anatomical overview of the critical structures before clipping and transection of the cystic duct.7 However, recent data from The Netherlands have suggested that there is no uniformity concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy especially with regards to the use of IOC, routine or selective, or the use of careful anatomical dissection to provide a ‘critical view of safety’.8 There are no guidelines in the UK on the routine management of gallstones, use of IOC, or dissection to provide a critical view of safety. This study carried out a survey of the members of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS) to determine current surgical practice with regard to management of gallstones, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
An e-mail questionnaire survey of the 417 full members of the AUGIS was performed in 2008. AUGIS is the principal forum in the UK for surgeons with a declared interest in oesophagogastric (OG) and hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery (HPB). Written permission was obtained from the president of AUGIS in order to circulate questionnaires. A reminder e-mail was sent to non-responders after the initial e-mail. The study was closed for recruitment 3 months after the first round of e-mails.
A three-part, brief, anonymous questionnaire was designed to obtain an overview of pre-operative assessment and intra-operative technique in the management of gall stones, with specific emphasis on the use of intra-operative cholangiogram (Appendix 1). The three parts of the questionnaire are as follows:
The responses to the survey were anonymised for collation and analysis. Responses to questionnaires were transcribed onto an electronic database (Microsoft Excel; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) for further analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared test and Fisher's exact t-test as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
There was a 36% (152/417) response to the questionnaire.
Of respondents, 134 (88%) were consultant surgeons and 18 (12%) were registrars. The majority of the respondents were from the OG speciality (n = 106; 70%) followed by HPB (n = 36; 24%) and general surgery specialities (n = 10; 6%).
Of respondents, 39% (n = 59) recommend IOC for a dilated CBD (> 6 mm) noted on pre-operative ultrasound, 23% recommend pre-operative MRCP in the first instance, and a further 19% were unsure and would perform either MRCP pre-operatively or IOC. The consensus view provided by 88 surgeons (58%) was that IOC should be performed at surgery to investigate further a dilated bile duct identified on pre-operative ultrasound.
A wide dissection of Calot's triangle to provide a ‘critical view’ was advocated by 124 (82%) of surgeons. Seventy-nine surgeons (52%) prefer to clip and divide the cystic artery prior to clipping the cystic duct, and 36 surgeons (24%) recommend routine cholangiography, whereas 106 surgeons (69%) advocate use of IOC on a selective basis. The operative techniques favoured during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are summarised in Table 1.
IOC was performed routinely by 24% (n = 36) of surgeons in all cases, whereas a further 69% of surgeons (n = 106) favoured a more selective approach, with IOC generally performed in fewer that 25% of cases (67%; 71/106). Only 6% (n = 10) stated that they did not perform IOC in any case. There was no significant difference noted in the use of IOC between different specialities, operating surgeon, or university hospital and district general hospital. However, surgeons performing < 50 LC per year (P = 0.02) were more likely to perform routine IOC. Surgeons performing higher volumes (> 100 LC per year) of cases were more likely to perform IOC selectively (P = 0.04).
When bile duct stones are identified on IOC, 61% of AUGIS surgeons perform laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE), 25% advise postoperative ERCP, and 14% perform either an open CBD exploration or postoperative ERCP. Thirty-five of 64 surgeons (55%) in district general hospitals perform LCBD exploration compared to 56/88 surgeons (64%) in university hospitals (P = 0.037).
Of AUGIS surgeons, 88% (134/152) currently perform index cholecystectomy for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. Surgeons practicing in a university hospital are more likely to perform index cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis compared to those in district general hospitals (83 vs 51; P = 0.025). However only 77 of 134 surgeons (57%) that perform index cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis also recommend IOC when operating on patients with acute cholecystitis.
There are no data available on the preferred operative technique to reduce the risk of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK. The present survey assessed the use of IOC amongst specialist upper gastrointestinal (AUGIS) surgeons who undertake laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a regular basis. There was no consensus on the use of IOC, or the practice of routine IOC (only 24%) in this group of surgeons. However, most specialist surgeons (82%) widely dissect Calot's triangle to obtain a critical view of safety prior to clipping and dividing the cystic duct and artery. This technique was first described and widely advocated by Professor Steven Strasberg, of St Louis, Missouri, USA7 and is gaining wide-spread acceptance as a safe alternative to IOC in minimising the intra-operative risk of inadvertent bile duct injury.
The practice of IOC1 has increased with the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the associated increase in CBD injuries that occurred in the early 1990s. However, the routine use of IOC to reduce the risk of CBD injury3 is at the discretion of the operating surgeon, and several authors rather recommend the selective use of IOC based on pre-operative criteria to detect occult bile duct stones.9,10
However, many studies are underpowered and, therefore, offer limited evidence on the efficacy of IOC in reducing the rate of CBD injury. This was addressed in 2002 by a meta-analysis of 40 case-series that included 327,523 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and calculated that routine use of IOC halved the rate of CBD injury.14 A more recent comprehensive review on the use of IOC concluded that routine IOC does appear to decrease bile duct injury and that wide-spread use of routine IOC would improve patient safety.3 The present survey noted that the practice of routine IOC is relatively low amongst OG and HPB surgeons in the UK, with only 24% recommending IOC as a routine practice.
The ‘critical view of safety’ advocated by Strasberg is generally accepted as a safe method to obtain an overview of the key anatomical structures that should be clearly identified before clipping and transecting the cystic duct.7 Recent studies have shown this technique to be effective in minimising bile duct injury.15,16 Interestingly, a recent Dutch survey reported that the concept of a critical view of safety was not wide-spread in The Netherlands, but has now been included in the Best Practice for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy guidance document published by the Dutch Society of Surgery.8 There are no similar technical guidelines in the UK but, in this study, most surgeons (83 %) stated that they routinely dissect Calot's triangle to provide a critical view of safety, to minimise the risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.
The incidence of CBD stones in patients undergoing cholecystectomy is around 10–18%,17 and non-invasive modalities are increasingly used to investigate suspected cholelidochothiasis.18 MRCP is increasingly used to identify patients who require ERCP prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. As a consequence, there is now little role for ERCP as a first-line pre-operative assessment, and this is reflected in this study where only 2% of surgeons recommend ERCP for assessment of a dilated CBD on pre-operative ultrasound.
When bile duct stones are identified on IOC, the management may be surgical or endoscopic depending on local expertise. A recent Cochrane review compared open CBD exploration with pre-operative or postoperative ERCP and noted a higher clearance rate, a significantly lower mortality rate, and a trend towards decreased morbidity in patients who underwent a surgical intervention.17 The Cochrane review of laparoscopic bile duct exploration versus either pre-operative or postoperative ERCP evaluated a relatively small number of patients from four clinical trials and demonstrated less convincing results.17 A further meta-analysis found no difference in successful duct clearance, morbidity or mortality between endoscopic and surgical management, whether performed by open or laparoscopic technique.18 From these studies, it can be concluded that, for most patients, a single surgical procedure with bile duct exploration is as effective as pre-operative or postoperative ERCP, and reduces the overall hospital stay. Most surgeons (61%) in this study recommend surgical exploration of the CBD as definitive management of bile duct stones noted on IOC, where the use of an open or laparoscopic approach is dictated by local expertise.19 Interestingly, the present survey showed that surgeons practicing in university hospitals are more likely to perform a laparoscopic CBD exploration compared to surgeons practicing in district general hospitals, who are more likely to recommend postoperative ERCP.
The practice of early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is quite variable, with 55% of Australian surgeons advising early laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the same admission,20 and 42% of Japanese surgeons also performing index admission cholecystectomy.21 In contrast, recent data (2008) from England reported that only 15% of patients undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease in the same admission,22 which is similar to that reported in 2004 when two postal questionnaire surveys in Britain revealed that less than 20% of surgeons carried out a laparoscopic cholecystectomy following an emergency admission.23,24. In contrast to these previously published UK statistics, it is interesting to note in this survey that 88% of AUGIS surgeons now recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the same admission for acute gall bladder disease. This may reflect the specialist interest of the AUGIS surgeons in this survey, but may also suggest there is a shift toward early surgery for patients that present with acute gallbladder pathology compared to previous surveys.
This survey provides an important insight into current standards of practice for symptomatic gallstones in the UK. A significant proportion (24%) of oesophagogastric and hepatopancreaticobiliary surgeons recommend routine intra-operative cholangiography to reduce the risk of bile duct injury, but the majority (83%) advise careful dissection of Calot's triangle to provide a critical view of safety prior to ligation and division of anatomical structures between the gallbladder and hepatoduodenal ligament. Most surgeons explore the bile duct to remove stones identified on IOC, and 88% of surgeons recommend index admission cholecystectomy for patients that present with acute gallbladder pathology.
This study was given, in part, as an oral presentation at the 8th Congress of the European Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Athens, Greece, in June 2009 and published in abstract form as: P Sanjay, C Kulli, FM Polignano, IS Tait Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC): utilisation and management of gall bladder disease: results of a nationwide survey in the United Kingdom and Ireland, HPB 2009; 11 (Suppl 1): 13.
1. Grade of surgeon?Consultant SpR
2. Sub-speciality?General OG
3. Type of hospital?DGHTeaching
4. Number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed per year
< 2525–5050–100> 100
5. Do you routinely perform before laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
6. If ultrasound reports a dilated bile duct (> 6 mm) pre-operatively, do you perform:
7. Do you perform IOC?YesNo
8. If yes, frequency of IOC
9. Your policy for IOC?
10. Do you perform intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS) instead of IOC?
11. Do you perform a wide dissection of Calot's triangle to provide a ‘critical view’?
12. Do you divide the cystic duct first (i.e. before division of cystic artery)?
13. Do you divide cystic artery first (i.e. before division of cystic artery)?
14. If stones are noted on IOC or IOUS during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, do you perform:
Laparoscopic CBD explorationYesNo
Open CBD explorationYesNo
15. Do you think IOC should be performed:
16. Do you perform early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis during the index admission?
17. Do you perform IOC on these cases with acute cholecystitis?