The major hypothesis of the HALT-C Trial was that due to its antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, prolonged low-dose peginterferon treatment would lead to a significant reduction in the rate of liver disease progression in prior non-responders with advanced fibrosis. The study results, however, indicated no benefit from low-dose maintenance peginterferon in the 1,050 randomized patients followed for 3.5 years in the HALT-C Trial (
Di Bisceglie et al., 2008). Those results were confirmed by two similar studies that also used prolonged courses of low dose interferon and failed to show significant benefit with maintenance therapy in prior non-responders (
Afdhal et al., 2008;
Fartoux et al., 2007). Since interferon is known to be associated with frequent and potentially severe neuropsychiatric toxicity, (
Dieperink et al., 2000;
Raison et al., 2005;
Schaefer at al., 2002), the current ancillary study was implemented at two of the HALT-C sites to prospectively assess the extent and severity of mood and cognitive changes associated with prolonged low-dose peginterferon treatment. We previously reported our results concerning possible cognitive changes associated with maintenance peginterferon therapy (
Fontana et al., 2010). The current results failed to show any evidence of an increase in the frequency or severity of depression that can be attributed solely to the effects of low dose maintenance peginterferon. Scores on the BDI-II as well as rates of CIDI depression did not change during the course of treatment and contrary to our expectations they did not differ significantly between the treated and the untreated groups. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in “clinical depression” over time between the treated and untreated groups.
We also examined the possible contributions of different confounding variables, including medication adherence, progression of liver disease and use of antidepressant medications. Medication adherence could be an important issue because only 60% of the peginterferon treated patients in the HALT-C Trial were able to take the prescribed dose of 90 ug/wk for longer than 80% of the time (
Di Bisceglie et al., 2008). We therefore postulated that patients with poor compliance (less than or equal to 80% of intended peginterferon dose) would be less depressed than those with good compliance. The results, however, showed that medication adherence was not associated with mood status since the rates of clinical depression did not vary significantly between those who took their peginterferon on a regular basis and those who did not ().
Severity of liver disease is another issue we examined carefully. Our hypothesis was that patients whose liver condition was deteriorating rapidly would show more evidence of depression than those whose liver disease was stable. Our results did confirm this hypothesis in that patients with liver disease progression during treatment had a higher rate of depression than those whose liver status remained unchanged. Interestingly, these results are at odds with the lack of association between liver disease progression and cognitive function in the same sample (
Fontana et al., 2010). However, prior studies have demonstrated a greater frequency of affective disorders in patients with decompensated liver disease compared to those with compensated cirrhosis presumably due to poorer health status and overall prognosis (
Cordoba et al., 2003). In addition, results from the overall HALT-C Trial demonstrated a decline in health-related quality of life and sexual health in subjects with disease progression (
Snow et al., 2010).
Use of antidepressant medications was allowed during the HALT-C Trial to help maintain patient interest and adherence to the protocol. We therefore hypothesized that since patients taking peginterferon were more likely to be depressed, use of antidepressant medications would be significantly higher in this group of patients. Our results, however, show that the use of antidepressant medications did not significantly differ between the peginterferon treated patients and the control group (). It is still possible, however, that peginterferon treatment could have been associated with mood changes that have been masked by the use of antidepressant medications. This possibility, however, seems unlikely since use of antidepressant medications was as common in the untreated patients as it was in the treatment group.
The mood effects associated with interferon treatment for CHC are well established (
Dieperink et al., 2000;
Raison et al., 2005;
Schaefer at al., 2002,
Evon et al., 2009). However, the majority of studies have been performed with the standard full-dose of peginterferon (180 ug/wk) in combination with ribavirin and for periods of time generally not exceeding 48 weeks (
Fried and Russo, 2003;
Hilsabeck et al., 2003;
Lee et al., 2006). Results of these studies indicate that the risk of interferon-induced depression is about 20%–40% and that the risk increases with the dose of interferon and its duration (
Raison et al., 2005). Similar results have been obtained with high dose interferon monotherapy for malignant melanoma (
Musselman, et al., 2001). Furthermore, in many of these studies, depression at the beginning of treatment seems to increase the risk of interferon-induced depression (
Cai et al., 2005;
Capuron et al., 1999;
Dieperink et al., 2003;
Hauser et al., 2002). Our study may be the only study in CHC patients to prospectively and in a controlled manner assess the mood effects of low-dose (i.e. 90 ug/ week) maintenance peginterferon using standardized instruments. Our results suggest that the low dose of peginterferon used does not increase the rate of depression even if continued for several years despite substantial reductions in quality of life scores and sexual health assessment in peginterferon treated patients compared to untreated controls (
Snow et al., 2010). Only baseline depression and liver disease progression during treatment were associated with an increased risk of depression during low dose maintenance treatment. Although this treatment was not effective in slowing the rate of liver disease progression, our results indicate that prolonged peginterferon therapy can be safely administered without increasing the rate of clinical depression should it prove useful in selected CHC patients or other medical conditions (
Di Bisceglie et al., 2008,
Eggermont et al, 2008).
With respect to proposed mechanisms of interferon-induced depression (
Dieperink et al., 2000;
Cai et al., 2005;
Capuron et al., 2003, a,
b), our results indicate a significant drop in whole blood serotonin levels over time. There are however no significant changes between the groups or in the time by group interaction. Based on our prior results of the lead-in phase in the same patient population (
Fontana et al., 2008), we anticipated that normalized serotonin levels would drop significantly over time in the peginterferon group but not in the untreated control group. However, this was not observed. The most likely explanation is that the drop in serotonin levels over time was related to antidepressant treatment, particularly SSRI, thus affecting both interferon-treated patients and untreated controls (
Schäfer et al., 2010). It is also possible that this phenomenon is dose dependent and that the dose of peginterferon in the maintenance group of 90 ug per week was not sufficient to affect serotonin levels as did the higher dose of 180 ug per week in the lead-in phase. A final explanation for the lack of a difference in the two treatment groups may relate to the limited number of patients who had blood samples tested. Regarding cortisol levels, our hypothesis was that cortisol levels would remain unchanged over time and between groups since this is what we observed with higher doses of interferon in the lead-in phase (
Fontana et al., 2008). Therefore, in the case of cortisol, the null hypothesis was confirmed.
The relationship between cortisol, serotonin and interferon-induced depression remains complex and is still far from being resolved. Both in our previous work (Fontana et al., 2005) and the work of others (
Schafer et al., 2010), no significant relationship between mood changes and the observed changes in serotonin levels could be established. While it has long been known that several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interferon, stimulate the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis (
Corsmitt et al., 1996;
Sapolsky et al., 1987) and increase neurotransmitter turnover, including serotonin (
Dunn et al., 1995;
Kronfol and Remick, 2000) the exact mechanisms by which cytokines in general and interferon, in particular, lead to depression has not been completely elucidated. It is possible the increased serotonin turnover is associated with serotonin receptor down regulation (
Siever and Davis, 1985). It is also possible that depression is related to neurotoxicity of kynurenine and its metabolites which are stimulated by cytokines (
Wichers et al., 2005), Alternatively, inflammatory cytokines, which are increased in major depression (
Dowlati et al., 2009;
Zorrilla et al., 2001), have been shown to access the brain and interact with various pathophysiologic pathways known to be involved in depression including neural plasticity (
Miller et al., 2009). It is therefore possible that interferon-induced depression could occur without significant changes in either cortisol or serotonin concentrations.
Strengths of this study include the large number of well-characterized CHC patients who were prospectively studied over 3.5 years in a randomized controlled trial. Another strength is the use of standardized psychiatric assessment tools that examined both the scope and severity of depressive symptoms (the BDI-II) as well as the DSM IV diagnosis of depression (the CIDI). A third strength is the examination of key confounding variables such as medication adherence, progression in liver disease and use of antidepressant medications. The absence of mood changes with low dose maintenance peginterferon treatment, although contrary to our proposed hypotheses, seems quite justified by the data. Although HALT-C Trial patients that received peginterferon reported significant declines in quality of life and sexual function over time, we surmise that the low dose of peginterferon used in this study was insufficient to cause substantial mood changes (
Snow et al, 2010). It is also possible that our inclusion of only prior non-responders to full-dose peginterferon and ribavirin combination therapy prior to randomization may have selected out highly tolerant patients to the biological effects of interferon. In support of this, a prior prospective study of depression in treatment naïve CHC patients demonstrated that subjects with psychiatric adverse events were significantly more likely to have had early treatment discontinuation compared to subjects without side effects (
Evon et al, 2009). Other limitations of our study include the naturalistic approach which allowed the patients access to antidepressant medications, and the use of an untreated control group rather than a placebo-control group. Despite these limitations, we feel that our results add an important dimension to the literature on the mood effects of interferon and provide important information regarding the safety and tolerability of low-dose maintenance peginterferon.
In summary, our results indicate that low-dose maintenance peginterferon treatment was not associated with an increase in the severity or rate of depression in a highly selected group of CHC patients who had not-responded to prior full-dose combination therapy. Only baseline depression and liver disease progression were associated with depression in these patients. Our data suggest that, low dose maintenance peginterferon in non-responder CHC patients has minimal effects on mood in comparison to full dose peginterferon and ribavirin in treatment naïve patients (
Evon et al, 2009). Finally, our results suggest that low doses of maintenance peginterferon may be well-tolerated in CHC patients requiring chronic treatment and possibly in patients with other medical conditions such as multiple sclerosis, malignant melanoma, or myeloproliferative disorders that are interferon responsive (
Eggermont et al, 2008,
Mahon et al, 2002).