PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of molcellbPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalMCB ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
Mol Cell Biol. Jan 2011; 31(1): 81–91.
Published online Oct 25, 2010. doi:  10.1128/MCB.01001-10
PMCID: PMC3019857
The Rho Target PRK2 Regulates Apical Junction Formation in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells [down-pointing small open triangle]
Sean W. Wallace, Ana Magalhaes, and Alan Hall*
Cell Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Cell Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1274 York Ave., New York, NY 10065. Phone: (212) 639-2387. Fax: (212) 717-3604. E-mail: halla/at/mskcc.org
Present address: Angiogenesis Laboratory, CIPM, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal.
Received August 26, 2010; Revised September 21, 2010; Accepted October 18, 2010.
Rho GTPases regulate multiple signaling pathways to control a number of cellular processes during epithelial morphogenesis. To investigate the downstream pathways through which Rho regulates epithelial apical junction formation, we screened a small interfering RNA (siRNA) library targeting 28 known Rho target proteins in 16HBE human bronchial epithelial cells. This led to the identification of the serine-threonine kinase PRK2 (protein kinase C-related kinase 2, also called PKN2). Depletion of PRK2 does not block the initial formation of primordial junctions at nascent cell-cell contacts but does prevent their maturation into apical junctions. PRK2 is recruited to primordial junctions, and this localization depends on its C2-like domain. Rho binding is essential for PRK2 function and also facilitates PRK2 recruitment to junctions. Kinase-dead PRK2 acts as a dominant-negative mutant and prevents apical junction formation. We conclude that PRK2 is recruited to nascent cell-cell contacts through its C2-like and Rho-binding domains and promotes junctional maturation through a kinase-dependent pathway.
Apical junctions, including tight and adherens junctions, are important for epithelial cell-cell adhesion, selective permeability, and apical-basal polarity. The formation of apical junctions is therefore essential for epithelia to regulate tissue integrity and homeostasis. Tight junctions and adherens junctions form at the apical margin of the lateral membrane in vertebrate epithelial cells through the interactions of transmembrane junctional proteins. Tight junctions principally consist of the transmembrane proteins occludin and the claudin family, while adherens junctions are principally composed of E-cadherin (2, 29). Additional transmembrane proteins, including nectins, JAM (junctional adhesion molecule), and tricellulin, also contribute to apical junctions. Junctional transmembrane proteins associate via their cytoplasmic domains with a large number of adaptor and signaling proteins and with the actin cytoskeleton (21, 23).
Epithelial apical junction formation is initiated by the trans interaction of E-cadherin molecules, which results in the stabilization of E-cadherin puncta at nascent cell-cell contacts, referred to as spot-like or primordial junctions (1). Primordial junctions contain many of the proteins found in mature adherens junctions, including the catenins, as well as the tight junction protein ZO-1 (4, 39). The formation of primordial junctions depends on actin polymerization, and E-cadherin puncta are stabilized at cell-cell contacts by interacting with actin filaments (10, 17). The formation of mature apical junctions, consisting of distinct tight and adherens junctions, requires the recruitment of additional tight junction proteins and the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton to form the characteristic perijunctional actin belt, a process that requires actomyosin contractility (17, 39, 47). Epithelial apical junctions can thus be regulated by a number of cellular processes, including the expression and trafficking of junctional proteins and the organization of the actin cytoskeleton (13, 44). Many signaling pathways have been implicated in the regulation of epithelial apical junctions, including those controlled by the Rho GTPase family members Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 (15, 34).
Rho plays a particularly important role in epithelial morphogenesis, as one of its target proteins, Rho kinase (ROCK), is a key regulator of myosin II-dependent actomyosin contractility (32). ROCK activates myosin II by inhibiting MLC (myosin light chain) phosphatase, leading to increased MLC phosphorylation. During embryogenesis, apical constriction of epithelial cells, as a result of apically localized myosin II activity, contributes to cell invagination events. In the Drosophila melanogaster embryo, for example, localized activation of Rho has been shown to control apical constriction during gastrulation and spiracle cell invagination (19, 37). Another key morphogenetic event during embryogenesis is the sealing of epithelial sheets, and Rho, acting through myosin II, is required for the elongation of leading-edge cells during Drosophila dorsal closure (12, 16).
Evidence that Rho regulates apical junction formation in mammalian epithelial cells has come from experimental manipulation of Rho activity using bacterial C3 transferase or the expression of mutant Rho proteins in numerous cell types, including MDCK kidney epithelial cells, keratinocytes, Eph4 mammary epithelial cells, T84 intestinal cells, MCF7 breast carcinoma cells, and HCT116 colon carcinoma cells (6, 26, 33, 38, 40, 46). Investigation of the downstream signaling pathways through which Rho regulates apical junctions has principally focused on ROCK. The inhibition of ROCK in T84 cells prevents apical junction formation, and in MCF7 breast carcinoma cells, it results in reduced E-cadherin accumulation at cell-cell contacts (36, 43). ROCK is believed to promote reorganization of the characteristic perijunctional apical actin belt, which supports apical junction formation/stabilization in polarized epithelial cells, through actomyosin contractility (17, 38, 47). However, ROCK inhibition has no effect on adherens junction formation in MDCK or HCT116 cells, suggesting that alternative and/or redundant pathways downstream of Rho are active in different cell types (33).
In addition to ROCK, more than 20 other Rho target proteins have been described. In the present study, we report a systematic analysis of Rho signaling pathways regulating apical junction formation in 16HBE human bronchial epithelial cells, an immortalized but nontransformed cell line derived from the epithelium of the lung airway (9). Understanding the pathways that regulate the integrity of the lung epithelium is of great importance, as loss of epithelial integrity is a characteristic feature of lung diseases, including cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (45). In this study, we identify the Rho target PRK2 (protein kinase C-related kinase 2) as a regulator of apical junction formation in human bronchial epithelial cells.
Reagents and antibodies.
Unless stated otherwise, all chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The primary antibodies used were RhoA (clone 26C4) and RhoA/C (rabbit polyclonal, sc-179) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); occludin (rabbit polyclonal), ZO-1 (clone 1A12), ZO-1 (rabbit polyclonal), and E-cadherin (clone ECCD-2) from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA); E-cadherin (clone 34) and PRK2 (clone 22) from BD Transduction (Lexington, KY); phospho-PRK1 (Thr774)/PRK2 (Thr816) (rabbit polyclonal) from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA); α-tubulin (clone YL1/2) from AbD Setotec (Raleigh, NC); β-actin (clone AC-74) and FLAG (clone M2) from Sigma-Aldrich; hemagglutinin (HA; clone 3F10) from Roche; and myc (clone 9E10) from Cancer Research UK (London, United Kingdom). Alexa Fluor 488- and 568-conjugated secondary antibodies and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated phalloidin were from Invitrogen. Aminomethylcoumarin acetate (AMCA)-, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-, and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA).
Cell culture and transfection.
16HBE14o− cells were provided by Dieter Gruenert (California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA) and were cultured in minimal essential medium (MEM) plus GlutaMAX (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% BenchMark FBS (Gemini Bio-Products, West Sacramento, CA) and penicillin (100 U/ml)-streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (Invitrogen) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Transfections were carried out by seeding cells at low density (1.5 × 104 cells/cm2, 10 to 20% confluence) and allowing them to adhere overnight. Small interfering RNA (siRNA; 50 nM) was transfected in medium without antibiotics, using 100 pmol siRNA and 5 μl Lipofectamine LTX (Invitrogen) per 1.2 × 105 cells. For DNA transfection, 5 μl Lipofectamine LTX and 200 ng plasmid DNA were used per 1.2 × 105 cells. For retroviral infection, 16HBE cells were seeded as described above and then incubated overnight in growth medium containing retroviral particles produced in HEK293T cells and supplemented with 8 μg/ml Polybrene (hexadimethrine bromide). Two days after infection, stable pools were selected using 1.5 μg/ml puromycin (Invitrogen). For calcium switch experiments, cells were washed extensively in PBS without calcium, incubated in low-calcium medium for 4 h, and then switched to normal growth medium containing calcium. Low-calcium medium was prepared using Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) without calcium chloride (Invitrogen) and supplemented with 10% FBS pretreated with Chelex 100 resin (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
HEK293T cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA) were cultured in DME-HG (high-glucose DMEM) plus sodium pyruvate supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin (100 U/ml)-streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (Invitrogen) at 37°C in 5% CO2. For transfection, cells were seeded at 3 × 104 cells/cm2 and allowed to adhere overnight. One microgram plasmid DNA per 3 × 105 cells was transfected using 5 μl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). For retroviral particle production, cells were triply transfected with vesicular stomatitis virus G (VSV-G), Gag-Pol, and the pBABE vector of interest, and at 6 h posttransfection, the medium was changed to 16HBE growth medium for 24 h to collect viral particles.
siRNA reagents.
siRNAs were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Lafayette, CO) and included RhoA SMARTpool M-003860-03, RhoA duplex1 D-003860-01, RhoA duplex2 D-003860-02, RhoA duplex3 D-003860-03, RhoA duplex4 D-003860-04, RhoC SMARTpool M-008555-01, PRK2 duplex1 D-004612-03, PRK2 duplex2 D-004612-10, and siControl (custom sequence, GGAAAUUAUACAAGACCAA). Additional SMARTpool reagents used for screening are listed in Table Table11.
TABLE 1.
TABLE 1.
SMARTpool siRNAs (Thermo Fisher Scientific) that target the indicated genes (with NCBI GeneID) and were used for screening
DNA constructs.
Mouse RhoA and RhoC cDNAs were obtained from ATCC and subcloned into the pRK5myc expression vector. Mouse PRK2 (mPRK2) was obtained from RZPD (Deutsches Resourcenzentrum für Genomforschung, Germany) and subcloned into the pBABE-HA and pRK5myc expression vectors. Note that the clone used (clone IRAV p968C10112D6) contains a deletion of 11 amino acids (Gln 32 to Gln 42) compared to NCBI reference sequence NM_178654.4. mPRK2(K685M) and mPRK2(D781A) were made by PCR amplification using primers containing the appropriate point mutations. mPRK2(A66K,A155K) was made by carrying out 2 rounds of PCR amplification with primers containing the appropriate point mutations. mPRK2ΔC2 contains a deletion of amino acids 381 to 462 and was made by overlap extension PCR using appropriate primers to amplify residues 1 to 381 and 463 to 983. All primers were purchased from Sigma-Genosys. All constructs were sequence verified.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting.
16HBE cell lysates were prepared by scraping cells in protein sample buffer (2% SDS, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 0.1% bromophenol blue) and boiling for 5 min at 100°C. For immunoprecipitation, transfected HEK293T cells were lysed in immunoprecipitation buffer (1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl) with 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and Complete protease inhibitor tablet (Roche), and cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min. The soluble fraction was incubated at 4°C with primary antibody for 1 h, followed by incubation with protein G Sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h. The beads were washed extensively with immunoprecipitation buffer and boiled in sample buffer. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and incubated with the appropriate primary antibodies. Proteins were visualized using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection reagents (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI).
Microscopy.
16HBE cells grown on glass coverslips were fixed in 3.7% (vol/vol) formaldehyde for 15 min and permeabilized in 0.5% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 for 5 min. Primary and secondary antibody incubations were carried out for 1 h at room temperature. Coverslips were mounted with fluorescent mounting medium (Dako) and visualized using a Zeiss AxioImager.A1 fluorescence microscope with 40× 0.75 numerical aperture (NA) and 63× 1.4 NA objectives (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY), using a Hammamatsu ORCA-ER 1394 C4742-80 digital camera (Bridgewater, NJ) and AxioVision software (Zeiss).
Apical junction quantification.
For each sample, 12 random nonoverlapping images were taken at ×40 magnification (~400 cells) and apical junction formation was quantified using the manual count function of Metamorph image analysis software (Universal Imaging, West Chester, PA). Cells with a continuous ring of occludin or ZO-1 at cell-cell contacts were scored as having intact apical junctions. Cells with punctate or discontinuous occludin or ZO-1 at cell-cell contacts were scored as not having apical junctions. The results were analyzed using Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Standard errors of the means (SEM) are shown with error bars, and significance values have been calculated using a two-tailed unpaired t test at the 95% confidence interval.
RhoA regulates apical junction formation in bronchial epithelial cells.
To determine whether Rho is required for apical junction formation in bronchial epithelial cells, RhoA expression was downregulated in 16HBE cells by RNA interference (RNAi). Cells were seeded at low density and transfected with a SMARTpool siRNA mixture consisting of 4 distinct siRNA duplexes targeting RhoA or with a control siRNA (siControl). Apical junction formation was assessed at 3 days posttransfection by staining with antibodies against the tight junction proteins occludin and ZO-1. The majority of control cells formed apical junctions, defined as a continuous ring of occludin and ZO-1 at cell-cell contacts. However, a significant number of RhoA-depleted cells did not form apical junctions and showed only weak punctate staining of occludin and ZO-1 at cell-cell contacts (Fig. 1A and B, and data not shown). To assess the specificity of this phenotype, 16HBE cells were transfected with the 4 individual siRNA duplexes comprising the RhoA SMARTpool. All 4 siRNA duplexes downregulated RhoA expression and resulted in defective apical junction formation (Fig. 1A to C), showing that this phenotype is a specific consequence of loss of RhoA expression. The RhoA siRNAs used do not affect the expression of RhoC, Rac1, or Cdc42 (data not shown).
FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
RhoA regulates apical junction formation in bronchial epithelial cells. 16HBE cells were seeded at low density and transfected with the indicated siRNAs. (A) Cells were fixed at 3 days posttransfection and stained with antioccludin (green) to visualize (more ...)
The closely related Rho family member RhoC is 91% identical to RhoA; however, there have been reports of functional differences between RhoA and RhoC. For example, overexpression of RhoC but not of RhoA resulted in disruption of adherens junctions in colon carcinoma cells as a result of ROCK-dependent actomyosin contraction (33). RNAi-mediated depletion of RhoC had no significant effect on apical junction formation in 16HBE cells (Fig. 2A and B), raising the possibility that RhoA and RhoC have nonredundant functions in these cells. Western blot analysis with an antibody that recognizes RhoA and RhoC but with an approximately 2-fold-higher affinity for RhoC (Fig. (Fig.2C,2C, left) revealed that RhoA expression is around 4-fold higher than RhoC expression in 16HBE cells (Fig. (Fig.2C,2C, right). Furthermore, exogenous expression of either mouse RhoA or mouse RhoC, which are resistant to depletion by RhoA siRNA duplex2, was able to rescue the apical junction defect caused by depletion of RhoA (Fig. (Fig.2D).2D). Staining with an antimyc antibody to identify transfected cells showed that RhoA and RhoC were expressed at similar levels in these experiments (data not shown). We conclude that RhoC can act redundantly with RhoA to regulate apical junction formation but, due to its greater abundance, RhoA is the predominant isoform regulating apical junction formation in 16HBE bronchial epithelial cells.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
RhoC acts redundantly with RhoA to regulate apical junction formation. (A) 16HBE cells were seeded at low density and transfected with the indicated siRNAs. At 3 days posttransfection, cells were fixed and stained with anti-ZO-1 antibody. Scale bar shows (more ...)
The Rho target protein PRK2 regulates apical junction formation in bronchial epithelial cells.
Rho GTPases interact with and regulate specific target proteins. To identify target proteins acting downstream of RhoA in 16HBE cells, a SMARTpool siRNA library targeting 28 known Rho targets was screened (Table (Table1).1). One Rho target protein, PRK2, was found to be required for apical junction formation (Fig. (Fig.3).3). Depletion of PRK2 caused a phenotype similar to that of depletion of RhoA, resulting in weak punctate staining of ZO-1 and occludin at cell-cell contacts but no change in the expression level of junctional proteins (Fig. (Fig.33 and data not shown). Two of the siRNA duplexes comprising the PRK2 SMARTpool were efficient at downregulating PRK2 expression, and both resulted in defective apical junction formation, suggesting that the effect is specific (Fig. (Fig.3).3). A SMARTpool targeting the closely related PRK1 had no significant effect on junctions. However, when a phospho-PRK antibody that recognizes an identical epitope in the two isoforms is used, PRK1 expression levels are around 2- to 3-fold lower than PRK2 levels in these cells (Fig. (Fig.4C),4C), and so, it is possible they share similar activities.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
The Rho target PRK2 regulates apical junction formation. 16HBE cells were seeded at low density and transfected with the indicated siRNAs. (A) At 3 days posttransfection, cells were fixed and stained with anti-ZO-1 (green) and Hoechst stain (blue). Scale (more ...)
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
PRK2 function is RhoA-dependent, kinase-dependent, and requires its C2-like domain. (A) Domain organization of PRK2, including HR1 (homology region 1) GTPase-binding domains, a C2-like domain, and a serine-threonine kinase domain. (B) Wild-type mouse (more ...)
PRK2 is a direct target of RhoA during apical junction formation.
To determine whether PRK2 is acting as a direct target of RhoA during apical junction formation, rescue experiments were carried out with a Rho binding-defective mutant. An alanine-to-lysine mutation was introduced into both the HR1a and HR1b GTPase-binding domains of mouse PRK2 to generate mPRK2(A66K,A155K). Based on structural studies of the related protein PRK1, these point mutations are predicted to prevent GTPase binding (27). The results of coimmunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that wild-type mPRK2 interacts with a constitutively activated version of RhoA (L63RhoA) but mPRK2(A66K,A155K) does not (Fig. (Fig.4B).4B). There are reports that PRK2 interacts with Rac, in addition to Rho; however, we detected only a weak interaction between mPRK2 and constitutively activated Rac1 (L61Rac1) (Fig. (Fig.4B).4B). Human PRK2 shows the same relative binding affinities to RhoA and Rac1 as mouse PRK2 (data not shown). Human PRK2 also interacts similarly with L63RhoC and L63RhoA (data not shown), consistent with RhoC being able to rescue depletion of RhoA (Fig. (Fig.2).2). 16HBE cells were infected with pBABE retroviral vectors containing HA-tagged mPRK2, mPRK2(A66K,A155K), or empty vector control, and stable pools selected with puromycin. Cells were seeded at low density and transfected with PRK2 siRNA duplex1, which contains 4 mismatches with the mouse PRK2 sequence, or with siControl. The expression of wild-type mPRK2 rescued apical junction formation, but the expression of the RhoA-binding-mutant mPRK2(A66K,A155K) did not (Fig. 4D and E). Although the expression level of mPRK2(A66K,A155K) was lower than the expression level of wild-type mPRK2 in the stably expressing cells used (Fig. (Fig.4C,4C, HA blot), mPRK2(A66K,A155K) was nevertheless expressed at higher levels than endogenous PRK2, as determined by blotting with a phospho-PRK antibody that recognizes both endogenous human and exogenous mouse PRK2 (Fig. (Fig.4C,4C, phospho-PRK blot). We conclude that PRK2 is a direct RhoA target required for apical junction formation in 16HBE cells.
PRK2 function is kinase dependent and requires its C2 domain.
In addition to its Rho-binding domain, PRK2 contains a C2-like domain and a kinase domain (Fig. (Fig.4A).4A). To determine which domains are required for PRK2 function, additional mutants were generated. mPRK2ΔC2 contains a deletion of amino acids 381 to 462, corresponding to the C2-like domain. When stably expressed in 16HBE cells, mPRK2ΔC2 was unable to rescue apical junction formation after knockdown of endogenous PRK2 (Fig. 4C to E), showing that the C2-like domain is required for PRK2 function during apical junction formation.
Two kinase-dead mutants of mPRK2 were generated. mPRK2(K685M) contains a mutation in the conserved lysine residue required for ATP binding, and this residue has been shown to be important for PRK2 kinase activity (41). mPRK2(D781A) contains a mutation in the conserved aspartate residue required for phosphate transfer, and mutation of this residue has been shown to be important for kinase activity in AGC family kinases (8). Both kinase-dead mutants acted as dominant negatives in 16HBE cells and inhibited apical junction formation (Fig. 4F to H), indicating that PRK2 function is kinase dependent.
RhoA and PRK2 regulate the maturation of primordial junctions into apical junctions.
The apical junctional complex of epithelial cells consists of tight junctions, adherens junctions, and the associated perijunctional actin ring. We have previously described the mechanism of apical junction formation in 16HBE cells by using a calcium switch to induce junction formation (42). Confluent monolayers of 16HBE cells were incubated in low-calcium medium to disassemble junctions, followed by the addition of calcium to stimulate junction formation. Upon the addition of calcium, 16HBE cells first formed primordial junctions, consisting of punctate accumulation of E-cadherin complexes, including ZO-1, at nascent cell-cell contacts (Fig. (Fig.5,5, 1 h). Junctional maturation then resulted in the formation of apical tight and adherens junctions, seen as continuous staining of ZO-1 and E-cadherin, respectively, at the cell-cell contact, and this was accompanied by reorganization of cortical actin filaments to form the perijunctional actin ring (Fig. (Fig.5,5, ,6h).6h). 16HBE monolayers depleted of RhoA or PRK2 were able to form primordial junctions, consisting of E-cadherin puncta, but were unable to form mature apical junctions (Fig. (Fig.5).5). We conclude that the RhoA-PRK2 signaling pathway is required for the transition from primordial junctions to mature apical junctions.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
The RhoA-PRK2 signaling pathway regulates the maturation of primordial junctions into apical junctions. Confluent monolayers of 16HBE cells transfected with RhoA siRNA duplex1, PRK2 siRNA duplex1, or siControl were subjected to calcium switch-induced (more ...)
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
PRK2 is recruited to primordial junctions to regulate their maturation. (A) 16HBE monolayers were subjected to calcium switch, fixed at the indicated times, and stained with the indicated antibodies. Red arrowheads indicate recruitment of PRK2 to primordial (more ...)
PRK2 is recruited to primordial junctions to regulate their maturation into apical junctions.
To understand how PRK2 regulates apical junction formation, we determined its localization. PRK2 is recruited to nascent cell-cell contacts and is first seen at primordial junctions 1 h after calcium switch (Fig. (Fig.6A,6A, red arrowheads). PRK2 continues to accumulate at cell-cell contacts as primordial junctions mature into apical junctions (Fig. (Fig.6A,6A, ,2-h2-h and 6-h time points). This recruitment of PRK2 to primordial junctions is consistent with its role in regulating their maturation.
To assess how PRK2 localization at junctions is regulated, we analyzed the localization of the mutants described above. In contrast to wild-type HA-mPRK2, which can be detected at junctions in over 50% of cells, junctional localization of HA-mPRK2ΔC2 could not be detected (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). The localization of the Rho-binding mutant HA-mPRK2(A66K,A155K) at junctions was also significantly reduced (Fig. (Fig.6B),6B), although very weak junctional localization was still detected in approximately 20% of cells. To confirm that RhoA binding regulates PRK2 localization, the localization of endogenous PRK2 was determined in RhoA-depleted cells. In contrast to control cells, PRK2 was not detected at primordial junctions in the majority of RhoA-depleted cells at either 1 h or 6 h after calcium switch (Fig. (Fig.6C).6C). We conclude that the C2-like domain and the Rho-binding domain of PRK2 are both required for junctional localization.
In this study, we sought to investigate the signaling pathways through which Rho regulates apical junction formation in bronchial epithelial cells. A library of SMARTpool siRNAs targeting 28 Rho target proteins was screened in 16HBE cells, and the protein kinase PRK2 identified. PRK2 belongs to a family of 3 serine-threonine kinases, the PKC-related kinase family, also called PKN (protein kinase novel) (24). PRK isoforms show homology to PKC family kinases within their conserved C-terminal kinase domains and contain an N-terminal GTPase-binding domain and a central domain with weak homology to the calcium-dependent phospholipid binding C2 domain of PKC (Fig. (Fig.4A).4A). The GTPase-binding domain, also called the HR1 (homology region 1), contains 3 tandem repeats of approximately 70 amino acids encoding antiparallel coiled-coil domains (referred to as HR1a to -c), which form independent GTPase-binding modules. In the case of PRK1 at least, only HR1a and HR1b bind to Rho GTPases (11). Initial studies of PRK1 found it to interact with active RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC but not Rac1, and when PRK2 was cloned, a similar specificity for Rho but not Rac was observed (3, 31). PRK2 has since been shown to interact with Rac, as well as Rho (41); however, we found only a very weak interaction between PRK2 and a constitutively active mutant of Rac1 in coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Point mutations were introduced into the HR1a and HR1b domains to prevent binding of PRK2 to active RhoA, and this mutant failed to rescue apical junction formation when endogenous PRK2 was depleted, showing that PRK2 acts as a RhoA target during apical junction formation.
A single PRK/PKN homolog exists in Drosophila, and there is evidence that it regulates epithelial morphogenesis. Null mutants of Drosophila PKN show defects in dorsal closure, a developmental process in which leading-edge cells of the epidermis elongate along the dorsal-ventral axis until they meet at the dorsal midline (20). Dorsal closure requires dynamic regulation of cell-cell adhesion and actomyosin-dependent cell shape changes, and PKN has been proposed to regulate this downstream of Rho (5). Biological roles for mammalian PRK proteins have not been clearly elucidated; however, overexpression studies have provided some clues to PRK function. RhoB recruits PRK1 to endosomes and has been suggested to regulate trafficking in HeLa cells (14). PRK2 has been implicated in the regulation of cadherin-dependent cell-cell adhesion in keratinocytes, as overexpression of PRK2 resulted in increased localization of E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts and increased adhesiveness (7). In this study, we demonstrate that PRK2 is required for the transition from primordial junctions to mature apical junctions. 16HBE cells depleted of PRK2 were able to form primordial junctions, consisting of punctate E-cadherin complexes at nascent cell-cell contacts, but these primordial junctions did not mature into apical junctions, consisting of tight and adherens junctions and the associated perijunctional actin filaments. We previously showed that PRK2 localizes to the midbody during cytokinesis and that PRK2 depletion in HeLa cells results in defective cell division, leading to the formation of multinucleated cells (35). No significant increase in multinucleated cells was observed in 16HBE cells depleted of PRK2, although PRK2 does localize at the midbody of these cells during cytokinesis (not shown).
PRK2 localizes to primordial junctions in 16HBE cells to promote their maturation. Localization of PRK2 at junctions is dependent on its C2-like domain. C2 domains are calcium-dependent phospholipid binding domains first described in classical PKC family members (22). The C2 domain of PRK lacks critical residues for calcium binding and is therefore referred to as a C2-like domain (30). C2-like domains might function as calcium-independent phospholipid binding domains but could also function as protein-protein interaction domains (22). PRK1 interacts with the actin filament binding protein α-actinin, and the interacting region has been mapped to residues 136 to 474, a region that overlaps with the C2-like domain (25). Interestingly, α-actinin localizes to adherens junctions in epithelial cells, raising the possibility that α-actinin recruits PRK2 to junctions (28). However, we found that during apical junction formation, α-actinin associates with cortical actin filaments and that it is only found at the cell-cell contact in mature junctions (not shown), so it is unlikely that α-actinin is responsible for recruiting PRK2 to primordial junctions.
Mutations in the HR1 domains of PRK2 to prevent binding to RhoA significantly reduced the junctional localization of PRK2, showing that RhoA binding contributes to this localization. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensors have been used to study RhoA activation in epithelial cells as junctions form, and it was found that RhoA is activated at nascent cell-cell contacts (46). The Rho binding-defective mutant did, however, show partial junctional localization in approximately 20% of cells, and yet, it completely failed to rescue tight junction formation after knockdown of endogenous PRK2, suggesting that RhoA is also likely to regulate PRK2 function through an additional mechanism. In vitro GTP-bound RhoA enhances the kinase activity of PRK2 (41). The binding of RhoA to the N-terminal GTPase-binding domain of PRK1 has been proposed to disrupt an autoinhibitory closed conformation between the N terminus and the kinase domain (18). By analogy, the interaction between active RhoA and PRK2 might allow PRK2 to adopt an open conformation at cell-cell contacts, thus activating the kinase domain and facilitating an interaction between the C2-like domain and as-yet-unidentified proteins/lipids to stably localize PRK2 at maturing junctions.
We recently described two additional serine-threonine kinases required for the formation of mature apical junctions in 16HBE cells, PAK4 and aPKC, both Cdc42 targets (42). Depletion of PRK2, PAK4, or aPKC leads to an apparently identical phenotype in which cells undergo the initial step of junction formation to form primordial junctions but these do not mature into apical junctions. This raises the question of why three separate protein kinase activities would be required for junctional maturation to occur. Apical junction formation requires the coordination of several processes, such as trafficking of proteins to the plasma membrane, regulation of junctional protein complexes, and reorganization of the cortical actin cytoskeleton. It therefore seems likely that PRK2, PAK4, and aPKC regulate different aspects of junction formation by phosphorylating distinct substrates. Future work will be aimed at identifying the relevant substrates of these kinases.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dieter Gruenert (California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA) for providing 16HBE14o− cells, Helen Mott (University of Cambridge, United Kingdom) for advice on PRK2 mutants, Joanna Porter (University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom) for technical advice, and all members of the Hall laboratory for helpful discussions.
This work was funded by a National Institutes of Health grant to A.H. (grant no. GM081435), S.W.W. was funded in part by a Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) graduate fellowship, and A.M. was funded in part by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal.
Footnotes
[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 25 October 2010.
1. Adams, C. L., Y. T. Chen, S. J. Smith, and W. J. Nelson. 1998. Mechanisms of epithelial cell-cell adhesion and cell compaction revealed by high-resolution tracking of E-cadherin-green fluorescent protein. J. Cell Biol. 142:1105-1119. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Aijaz, S., M. S. Balda, and K. Matter. 2006. Tight junctions: molecular architecture and function. Int. Rev. Cytol. 248:261-298. [PubMed]
3. Amano, M., H. Mukai, Y. Ono, K. Chihara, T. Matsui, Y. Hamajima, K. Okawa, A. Iwamatsu, and K. Kaibuchi. 1996. Identification of a putative target for Rho as the serine-threonine kinase protein kinase N. Science 271:648-650. [PubMed]
4. Asakura, T., H. Nakanishi, T. Sakisaka, K. Takahashi, K. Mandai, M. Nishimura, T. Sasaki, and Y. Takai. 1999. Similar and differential behaviour between the nectin-afadin-ponsin and cadherin-catenin systems during the formation and disruption of the polarized junctional alignment in epithelial cells. Genes Cells 4:573-581. [PubMed]
5. Betson, M., and J. Settleman. 2007. A rho-binding protein kinase C-like activity is required for the function of protein kinase N in Drosophila development. Genetics 176:2201-2212. [PubMed]
6. Braga, V. M., L. M. Machesky, A. Hall, and N. A. Hotchin. 1997. The small GTPases Rho and Rac are required for the establishment of cadherin-dependent cell-cell contacts. J. Cell Biol. 137:1421-1431. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Calautti, E., M. Grossi, C. Mammucari, Y. Aoyama, M. Pirro, Y. Ono, J. Li, and G. P. Dotto. 2002. Fyn tyrosine kinase is a downstream mediator of Rho/PRK2 function in keratinocyte cell-cell adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 156:137-148. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Cameron, A. J., C. Escribano, A. T. Saurin, B. Kostelecky, and P. J. Parker. 2009. PKC maturation is promoted by nucleotide pocket occupation independently of intrinsic kinase activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:624-630. [PubMed]
9. Cozens, A. L., M. J. Yezzi, K. Kunzelmann, T. Ohrui, L. Chin, K. Eng, W. E. Finkbeiner, J. H. Widdicombe, and D. C. Gruenert. 1994. CFTR expression and chloride secretion in polarized immortal human bronchial epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 10:38-47. [PubMed]
10. Ehrlich, J. S., M. D. Hansen, and W. J. Nelson. 2002. Spatio-temporal regulation of Rac1 localization and lamellipodia dynamics during epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Dev. Cell 3:259-270. [PubMed]
11. Flynn, P., H. Mellor, R. Palmer, G. Panayotou, and P. J. Parker. 1998. Multiple interactions of PRK1 with RhoA. Functional assignment of the Hr1 repeat motif. J. Biol. Chem. 273:2698-2705. [PubMed]
12. Franke, J. D., R. A. Montague, and D. P. Kiehart. 2005. Nonmuscle myosin II generates forces that transmit tension and drive contraction in multiple tissues during dorsal closure. Curr. Biol. 15:2208-2221. [PubMed]
13. Fujita, Y., and V. Braga. 2005. Epithelial cell shape and Rho small GTPases. Novartis Found. Symp. 269:144-155. [PubMed]
14. Gampel, A., P. J. Parker, and H. Mellor. 1999. Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor traffic by the small GTPase rhoB. Curr. Biol. 9:955-958. [PubMed]
15. Gonzalez-Mariscal, L., R. Tapia, and D. Chamorro. 2008. Crosstalk of tight junction components with signaling pathways. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1778:729-756. [PubMed]
16. Harden, N., M. Ricos, Y. M. Ong, W. Chia, and L. Lim. 1999. Participation of small GTPases in dorsal closure of the Drosophila embryo: distinct roles for Rho subfamily proteins in epithelial morphogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 112:273-284. [PubMed]
17. Ivanov, A. I., D. Hunt, M. Utech, A. Nusrat, and C. A. Parkos. 2005. Differential roles for actin polymerization and a myosin II motor in assembly of the epithelial apical junctional complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:2636-2650. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Kitagawa, M., H. Shibata, M. Toshimori, H. Mukai, and Y. Ono. 1996. The role of the unique motifs in the amino-terminal region of PKN on its enzymatic activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 220:963-968. [PubMed]
19. Kolsch, V., T. Seher, G. J. Fernandez-Ballester, L. Serrano, and M. Leptin. 2007. Control of Drosophila gastrulation by apical localization of adherens junctions and RhoGEF2. Science 315:384-386. [PubMed]
20. Lu, Y., and J. Settleman. 1999. The Drosophila Pkn protein kinase is a Rho/Rac effector target required for dorsal closure during embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 13:1168-1180. [PubMed]
21. Matter, K., and M. S. Balda. 2003. Signalling to and from tight junctions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:225-236. [PubMed]
22. Mellor, H., and P. J. Parker. 1998. The extended protein kinase C superfamily. Biochem. J. 332(Pt. 2):281-292. [PubMed]
23. Miyoshi, J., and Y. Takai. 2008. Structural and functional associations of apical junctions with cytoskeleton. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1778:670-691. [PubMed]
24. Mukai, H. 2003. The structure and function of PKN, a protein kinase having a catalytic domain homologous to that of PKC. J. Biochem. 133:17-27. [PubMed]
25. Mukai, H., M. Toshimori, H. Shibata, H. Takanaga, M. Kitagawa, M. Miyahara, M. Shimakawa, and Y. Ono. 1997. Interaction of PKN with alpha-actinin. J. Biol. Chem. 272:4740-4746. [PubMed]
26. Nusrat, A., M. Giry, J. R. Turner, S. P. Colgan, C. A. Parkos, D. Carnes, E. Lemichez, P. Boquet, and J. L. Madara. 1995. Rho protein regulates tight junctions and perijunctional actin organization in polarized epithelia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:10629-10633. [PubMed]
27. Owen, D., P. N. Lowe, D. Nietlispach, C. E. Brosnan, D. Y. Chirgadze, P. J. Parker, T. L. Blundell, and H. R. Mott. 2003. Molecular dissection of the interaction between the small G proteins Rac1 and RhoA and protein kinase C-related kinase 1 (PRK1). J. Biol. Chem. 278:50578-50587. [PubMed]
28. Perez-Moreno, M., A. Avila, S. Islas, S. Sanchez, and L. Gonzalez-Mariscal. 1998. Vinculin but not alpha-actinin is a target of PKC phosphorylation during junctional assembly induced by calcium. J. Cell Sci. 111(Pt. 23):3563-3571. [PubMed]
29. Pokutta, S., and W. I. Weis. 2007. Structure and mechanism of cadherins and catenins in cell-cell contacts. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23:237-261. [PubMed]
30. Ponting, C. P., and P. J. Parker. 1996. Extending the C2 domain family: C2s in PKCs delta, epsilon, eta, theta, phospholipases, GAPs, and perforin. Protein Sci. 5:162-166. [PubMed]
31. Quilliam, L. A., Q. T. Lambert, L. A. Mickelson-Young, J. K. Westwick, A. B. Sparks, B. K. Kay, N. A. Jenkins, D. J. Gilbert, N. G. Copeland, and C. J. Der. 1996. Isolation of a NCK-associated kinase, PRK2, an SH3-binding protein and potential effector of Rho protein signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 271:28772-28776. [PubMed]
32. Quintin, S., C. Gally, and M. Labouesse. 2008. Epithelial morphogenesis in embryos: asymmetries, motors and brakes. Trends Genet. 24:221-230. [PubMed]
33. Sahai, E., and C. J. Marshall. 2002. ROCK and Dia have opposing effects on adherens junctions downstream of Rho. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:408-415. [PubMed]
34. Samarin, S., and A. Nusrat. 2009. Regulation of epithelial apical junctional complex by Rho family GTPases. Front. Biosci. 14:1129-1142. [PubMed]
35. Schmidt, A., J. Durgan, A. Magalhaes, and A. Hall. 2007. Rho GTPases regulate PRK2/PKN2 to control entry into mitosis and exit from cytokinesis. EMBO J. 26:1624-1636. [PubMed]
36. Shewan, A. M., M. Maddugoda, A. Kraemer, S. J. Stehbens, S. Verma, E. M. Kovacs, and A. S. Yap. 2005. Myosin 2 is a key Rho kinase target necessary for the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:4531-4542. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Simoes, S., B. Denholm, D. Azevedo, S. Sotillos, P. Martin, H. Skaer, J. C. Hombria, and A. Jacinto. 2006. Compartmentalisation of Rho regulators directs cell invagination during tissue morphogenesis. Development 133:4257-4267. [PubMed]
38. Smutny, M., H. L. Cox, J. M. Leerberg, E. M. Kovacs, M. A. Conti, C. Ferguson, N. A. Hamilton, R. G. Parton, R. S. Adelstein, and A. S. Yap. 2010. Myosin II isoforms identify distinct functional modules that support integrity of the epithelial zonula adherens. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:696-702. [PubMed]
39. Suzuki, A., C. Ishiyama, K. Hashiba, M. Shimizu, K. Ebnet, and S. Ohno. 2002. aPKC kinase activity is required for the asymmetric differentiation of the premature junctional complex during epithelial cell polarization. J. Cell Sci. 115:3565-3573. [PubMed]
40. Takaishi, K., T. Sasaki, H. Kotani, H. Nishioka, and Y. Takai. 1997. Regulation of cell-cell adhesion by rac and rho small G proteins in MDCK cells. J. Cell Biol. 139:1047-1059. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Vincent, S., and J. Settleman. 1997. The PRK2 kinase is a potential effector target of both Rho and Rac GTPases and regulates actin cytoskeletal organization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2247-2256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Wallace, S. W., J. Durgan, D. Jin, and A. Hall. 2010. Cdc42 regulates apical junction formation in human bronchial epithelial cells through PAK4 and Par6B. Mol. Biol. Cell 21:2996-3006. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Walsh, S. V., A. M. Hopkins, J. Chen, S. Narumiya, C. A. Parkos, and A. Nusrat. 2001. Rho kinase regulates tight junction function and is necessary for tight junction assembly in polarized intestinal epithelia. Gastroenterology 121:566-579. [PubMed]
44. Wirtz-Peitz, F., and J. A. Zallen. 2009. Junctional trafficking and epithelial morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19:350-356. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. World Health Organization. 2003. The world health report 2003: shaping the future. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
46. Yamazaki, Y., K. Umeda, M. Wada, S. Nada, M. Okada, S. Tsukita, and S. Tsukita. 2008. ZO-1- and ZO-2-dependent integration of myosin-2 to epithelial zonula adherens. Mol. Biol. Cell 19:3801-3811. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Zhang, J., M. Betson, J. Erasmus, K. Zeikos, M. Bailly, L. P. Cramer, and V. M. Braga. 2005. Actin at cell-cell junctions is composed of two dynamic and functional populations. J. Cell Sci. 118:5549-5562. [PubMed]
Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)